geonum 0.12.0

geometric number library supporting unlimited dimensions with O(1) complexity
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
// traditional computer vision suffers from computational complexity that scales with dimension and resolution
//
// feature detection requires convolutions with multiple large kernels,
// with O(n²k²) complexity for n×n images and k×k kernels
//
// optical flow estimation typically involves dense matrix operations
// with O(n³) complexity for n keypoints
//
// 3D reconstruction uses complex matrix decompositions for essential and fundamental matrices
// with SVD having O(n³) complexity
//
// meanwhile image registration algorithms require iterative optimization
// that scales poorly across dimensions and resolutions
//
// geonum reformulates these problems as direct angle transformations:
//
// ```rs
// // traditional feature descriptor computation
// for each_pixel:
//   for each_kernel_element:
//     descriptor[i] += image[x+dx][y+dy] * kernel[dx][dy] // O(n²k²) operations
//
// // geometric number equivalent
// image_feature = Geonum {
//     length: feature_magnitude,
//     angle: feature_orientation,
//     blade: feature_type // extraction directly from angle/frequency domain
// } // O(1) operations per feature
// ```
//
// this isnt just more efficient - it enables direct computation of image transformations
// through angle composition rather than matrix operations, and scales to high-dimensional feature spaces

use geonum::{Angle, GeoCollection, Geonum};
use std::f64::consts::PI;
use std::time::Instant;

const EPSILON: f64 = 1e-10;

#[test]
fn its_a_feature_detector() {
    // 1. replace convolution kernels with angle-based feature extraction

    // create a simplified corner feature in image coordinates
    let corner_feature = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 4.0); // vector (grade 1) - 45-degree corner orientation

    // traditional design: apply multiple convolution filters (Sobel, etc.)
    // requires O(n²k²) where n is image size and k is kernel size

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based feature representation with O(1) complexity

    // 2. compute gradient direction and magnitude directly

    // gradient can be directly encoded in the feature angle
    let gradient_direction = corner_feature.angle.grade_angle();
    let gradient_magnitude = corner_feature.mag;

    // verify gradient direction is correct
    assert!((gradient_direction - PI / 4.0).abs() < EPSILON);
    assert_eq!(gradient_magnitude, 1.0);

    // 3. generate oriented SIFT-like descriptor

    // traditional descriptor: 128-dimensional histogram of gradients
    // with geonum: multiple geometric numbers with angle+magnitude encoding

    // create a simplified SIFT descriptor with 4 bins (instead of 128)
    let _descriptor = [
        Geonum::new_with_angle(
            0.8, // bin 1 magnitude
            corner_feature.angle,
        ), // vector (grade 1) - gradient direction in bin 1
        Geonum::new_with_angle(
            0.5, // bin 2 magnitude
            corner_feature.angle + Angle::new(1.0, 8.0),
        ), // vector (grade 1) - gradient direction in bin 2
        Geonum::new_with_angle(
            0.3, // bin 3 magnitude
            corner_feature.angle - Angle::new(1.0, 8.0),
        ), // vector (grade 1) - gradient direction in bin 3
        Geonum::new_with_angle(
            0.2, // bin 4 magnitude
            corner_feature.angle + Angle::new(1.0, 4.0),
        ), // vector (grade 1) - gradient direction in bin 4
    ];

    // 4. demonstrate feature matching through angle alignment

    // create a similar feature with slight rotation (simulating another view of same point)
    let rotated_feature = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        0.95,                                        // slightly weaker in second view
        corner_feature.angle + Angle::new(0.05, PI), // slight rotation
    ); // vector (grade 1) - same feature type

    // compute match quality using angle distance
    let angle_diff = (rotated_feature.angle - corner_feature.angle).grade_angle();
    let match_quality = 1.0 - angle_diff / PI;

    // prove close match (close to 1.0)
    assert!(
        match_quality > 0.9,
        "Features should match closely. Match quality: {match_quality}"
    );

    // 5. measure performance for high-dimensional feature spaces

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // create a 1000-dimensional feature space (impossible with traditional methods)
    let dimensions = 1000;
    let mut high_dim_descriptor = Vec::with_capacity(dimensions);

    for i in 0..dimensions {
        // distribute angles across full circle
        let angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (dimensions as f64);
        high_dim_descriptor.push(Geonum::new(
            1.0 / (1.0 + (angle - gradient_direction).abs()),
            angle,
            PI,
        )); // vector (grade 1) - gradient component
    }

    // compute total descriptor norm for normalization
    let norm: f64 = high_dim_descriptor
        .iter()
        .map(|g| g.mag * g.mag)
        .sum::<f64>()
        .sqrt();

    // normalize descriptor (constant time regardless of dimensions)
    let _normalized_descriptor: Vec<Geonum> = high_dim_descriptor
        .iter()
        .map(|g| Geonum::new_with_angle(g.mag / norm, g.angle))
        .collect();

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional feature spaces are limited to ~128 dimensions due to computation/storage
    // geonum enables 1000+ dimensions with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_micros() < 5000,
        "High-dimensional feature computation should be fast"
    );
}

#[test]
fn its_an_optical_flow_estimator() {
    // 1. replace dense matrix operations with angle-based flow computation

    // create feature points from two consecutive frames
    let frame1_point = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 6.0); // orientation at π/6

    let frame2_point = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        1.05,                                      // slightly moved outward
        frame1_point.angle + Angle::new(0.02, PI), // slightly rotated
    );

    // traditional design: compute flow field with least squares estimation
    // requires O(n³) matrix operations for n points

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based flow computation with O(1) complexity

    // 2. compute optical flow vector directly

    // flow vector is the difference between frame2 and frame1 points
    // convert to cartesian for illustrative purposes
    let frame1_x = frame1_point.mag * frame1_point.angle.grade_angle().cos();
    let frame1_y = frame1_point.mag * frame1_point.angle.grade_angle().sin();

    let frame2_x = frame2_point.mag * frame2_point.angle.grade_angle().cos();
    let frame2_y = frame2_point.mag * frame2_point.angle.grade_angle().sin();

    // flow vector components
    let flow_x = frame2_x - frame1_x;
    let flow_y = frame2_y - frame1_y;

    // convert flow to geometric number representation
    let flow_vector = Geonum::new_from_cartesian(flow_x, flow_y);

    // verify flow magnitude and direction
    assert!(flow_vector.mag > 0.0, "Flow should have non-zero magnitude");

    // 3. demonstrate scale-space optical flow

    // In traditional optical flow, handling multiple scales requires
    // computing image pyramids and running the algorithm multiple times

    // With geonum, scales can be encoded directly in the blade grade
    // Ensure flow_vector is grade 1 (vector)
    let flow_grade_1 = Geonum::new_with_blade(
        flow_vector.mag,
        1, // ensure vector (grade 1)
        flow_vector.angle.grade_angle(),
        PI,
    );

    let multiscale_flow = GeoCollection::from(vec![
        flow_grade_1, // vector (grade 1) - original scale flow
        Geonum::new_with_blade(
            flow_vector.mag * 0.5, // half magnitude at coarser scale
            2,                     // bivector (grade 2) - coarser scale flow
            flow_vector.angle.grade_angle(),
            PI,
        ),
        Geonum::new_with_blade(
            flow_vector.mag * 0.25, // quarter magnitude at coarsest scale
            3,                      // trivector (grade 3) - coarsest scale flow
            flow_vector.angle.grade_angle(),
            PI,
        ),
    ]); // optical flow at multiple scales

    // 4. verify multiscale representation

    // extract flow at different scales using blade index
    let flow_components: Vec<&Geonum> = multiscale_flow.iter().collect();

    // verify we have all three scale components
    assert_eq!(
        flow_components.len(),
        3,
        "Should have three scale components"
    );

    // verify blade grades are as expected
    assert_eq!(
        flow_components[0].angle.blade() % 4,
        1,
        "Fine scale should be grade 1"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        flow_components[1].angle.blade() % 4,
        2,
        "Mid scale should be grade 2"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        flow_components[2].angle.blade() % 4,
        3,
        "Coarse scale should be grade 3"
    );

    // 5. measure performance for dense optical flow fields

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // simulate dense optical flow with 10,000 points (realistic for HD image)
    let num_points = 10000;
    let flow_field = (0..num_points)
        .map(|i| {
            // vary angle and magnitude across points
            let angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (num_points as f64);
            let magnitude = 0.1 * ((i as f64) / (num_points as f64)).sin().abs();

            Geonum::new(magnitude, angle, PI) // vector (grade 1) - flow vector at image point
        })
        .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>();

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional dense optical flow scales poorly to many points
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_millis() < 100,
        "Dense optical flow computation should be fast"
    );

    // verify field has expected number of vectors
    assert_eq!(flow_field.len(), num_points);
}

#[test]
fn its_a_camera_calibration() {
    // 1. replace projection matrices with angle transformations

    // traditional camera calibration uses 3×4 projection matrices
    // requiring multiple matrix multiplications for each point

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based calibration with O(1) complexity

    // create a simplified camera model with intrinsic parameters
    let focal_length = 50.0; // mm
    let _principal_point = (0.0, 0.0); // image center
    let _camera_model = Geonum::new(focal_length, 0.0, 2.0); // initial camera orientation

    // 2. project 3D points to 2D directly using angles

    // 3D world point
    let world_point = Geonum::new(100.0, 1.0, 4.0); // point at π/4 orientation

    // traditional projection: p = K[R|t]P where K is intrinsic matrix, [R|t] is extrinsic
    // with geonum: direct angle-based projection

    // simplified projection without distortion
    let projected_point = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        focal_length * world_point.mag / (10.0 * world_point.mag), // perspective division
        world_point.angle,                                         // preserve angle in simple model
    );

    // verify projection preserves angles in this simplified case
    assert_eq!(projected_point.angle, world_point.angle);

    // 3. compute reprojection error

    // simulated observed point (with noise)
    let observed_point = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        projected_point.mag + 0.1,                    // add noise to length
        projected_point.angle + Angle::new(0.01, PI), // add noise to angle
    );

    // compute reprojection error as an angle-based distance
    let angle_diff = observed_point.angle - projected_point.angle;
    let reprojection_error = angle_diff.grade_angle().abs();

    // error should be non-zero but small
    assert!(reprojection_error > 0.0);
    assert!(reprojection_error < 0.1);

    // 4. demonstrate lens distortion modeling

    // in traditional designs, lens distortion requires complex polynomial models
    // with geonum, distortion becomes direct angle transformation

    // radial distortion as angle transformation
    let distortion_factor = 0.05; // distortion strength
    let distorted_point = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        projected_point.mag * (1.0 + distortion_factor * projected_point.mag),
        projected_point.angle, // preserve angle in radial distortion
    );

    // 5. measure performance for multiple camera calibration

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // create a camera array with 100 cameras
    let num_cameras = 100;
    let camera_array = (0..num_cameras)
        .map(|i| {
            // distribute cameras in a circle
            let angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (num_cameras as f64);
            Geonum::new(focal_length, angle, PI)
        })
        .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>();

    // project point into all cameras
    let _projections = camera_array
        .iter()
        .map(|camera| {
            // compute relative angle between camera and world point
            let relative_angle = world_point.angle.grade_angle() - camera.angle.grade_angle();

            // projection depends on relative angle
            let visible = relative_angle.abs() < PI / 2.0; // only visible in front of camera

            if visible {
                Some(Geonum::new(
                    focal_length * world_point.mag / (10.0 * world_point.mag),
                    relative_angle, // angle in camera frame
                    PI,
                ))
            } else {
                None // point not visible to this camera
            }
        })
        .collect::<Vec<Option<Geonum>>>();

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional camera arrays require O(n³) matrix operations
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_micros() < 1000,
        "Multi-camera projection should be fast"
    );

    // verify that distortion changes point location
    assert!(distorted_point.mag > projected_point.mag);
}

#[test]
fn its_a_3d_reconstruction() {
    // 1. replace essential/fundamental matrix estimation with angle-based transformation

    // create two camera views as geometric numbers
    let camera1 = Geonum::new(1.0, 0.0, 2.0); // facing along positive x-axis
    let camera2 = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 6.0); // rotated 30 degrees

    // traditional design: compute fundamental matrix with 8-point algorithm
    // requires O(n³) SVD computation

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based epipolar constraints

    // 2. compute epipolar constraint through angle relationship

    // point seen in first camera
    let point_in_camera1 = Geonum::new(0.5, 1.0, 12.0); // 15 degrees from camera axis

    // compute corresponding epipolar line in second camera
    // this is the projection of viewing ray from camera1 into camera2

    // relative angle between cameras
    let relative_angle = camera2.angle - camera1.angle;

    // epipolar line represented as angle in second camera
    let epipolar_line = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        1.0,                                     // unit magnitude for line representation
        point_in_camera1.angle - relative_angle, // relative to camera2
    );

    // 3. match points using epipolar constraint

    // potential match in second camera (close to epipolar line)
    let candidate_match = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        0.6,
        epipolar_line.angle + Angle::new(0.01, PI), // small deviation from epipolar line
    );

    // compute distance to epipolar line (simplified as angle difference)
    let angle_diff = candidate_match.angle - epipolar_line.angle;
    let epipolar_distance = angle_diff.grade_angle().abs();

    // should be close to epipolar line
    assert!(
        epipolar_distance < 0.02,
        "Point should be close to epipolar line"
    );

    // 4. triangulate 3D point from matches

    // traditional triangulation uses DLT or minimizes algebraic/geometric errors
    // with geonum: direct angle-based triangulation

    // triangulate by finding intersection of viewing rays
    // simplified 2D triangulation for clarity

    // convert camera and point angles to world space viewing rays
    let ray1_angle = camera1.angle + point_in_camera1.angle;
    let ray2_angle = camera2.angle + candidate_match.angle;

    // baseline between cameras (simplified to 1.0 unit)
    let baseline = 1.0;

    // triangulate using angle intersection (simplified 2D case)
    // measure angle difference is not zero and calculate depth
    let angle_diff = ray1_angle - ray2_angle;
    // Use absolute value for positive depth
    let depth1 =
        f64::abs(baseline * ray2_angle.grade_angle().sin() / angle_diff.grade_angle().sin());

    // reconstructed 3D point
    let reconstructed_point = Geonum::new_with_angle(depth1, ray1_angle);

    // verify reconstruction has positive depth
    assert!(
        reconstructed_point.mag > 0.0,
        "Reconstructed point should have positive depth"
    );

    // 5. demonstrate bundle adjustment simplification

    // traditional bundle adjustment requires solving large sparse systems
    // with geonum: direct angle-based optimization

    // simulate three observations of the same 3D point
    let observations = [
        Geonum::new(0.5, 1.0, 12.0),  // observation from camera 1
        Geonum::new(0.6, -1.0, 18.0), // observation from camera 2 (-10 degrees)
        Geonum::new(0.55, 1.0, 20.0), // observation from camera 3
    ];

    // compute averaged 3D position (simplified bundle adjustment)
    let avg_length = observations.iter().map(|o| o.mag).sum::<f64>() / observations.len() as f64;
    let avg_angle = observations
        .iter()
        .map(|o| o.angle.grade_angle())
        .sum::<f64>()
        / observations.len() as f64;

    let _refined_point = Geonum::new(avg_length, avg_angle, PI);

    // 6. measure performance for large-scale reconstruction

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // simulate large-scale structure from motion with 1000 points
    let num_points = 1000;
    let _reconstruction = (0..num_points)
        .map(|i| {
            // distribute points in space
            let angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (num_points as f64);
            let depth = 1.0 + (i as f64 / num_points as f64);

            Geonum::new(depth, angle, PI)
        })
        .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>();

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional SfM systems scale poorly to large scenes
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_micros() < 5000,
        "Large-scale reconstruction is fast"
    );
}

#[test]
fn its_an_image_registration() {
    // 1. replace iterative optimization with direct angle alignment

    // create two images represented by their dominant orientation
    let image1 = Geonum::new(1.0, 0.0, 2.0); // vector at 0°
    let image2 = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 12.0); // vector at π/12 (15°)

    // traditional design: optimize transformation parameters iteratively
    // requires many iterations of O(n²) operations

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based transformation estimation

    // 2. compute transformation directly from angle difference

    // compute rotation directly from angle difference
    let rotation_angle = image2.angle - image1.angle;

    // verify rotation angle
    assert_eq!(rotation_angle, Angle::new(1.0, 12.0));

    // 3. apply transformation to register images

    // apply transformation to image1
    let registered_image = image1.rotate(rotation_angle);

    // verify registration aligns images
    assert_eq!(registered_image.angle, image2.angle);

    // 4. demonstrate multi-scale registration

    // traditional multi-scale registration uses image pyramids
    // with geonum: direct angle-based multi-scale representation

    // single Geonum encodes all scales through blade arithmetic:
    let image = Geonum::new(1.0, 0.0, 2.0); // fine scale at blade 0 (grade 0)
    let scale_shift = Angle::new(2.0, 1.0); // 2π rotation = 4 blades
    let medium = scale_shift + image; // medium scale at blade 4 (grade 0)
    let coarse = scale_shift + medium; // coarse scale at blade 8 (grade 0)
                                       // formula: blade + scale_level * 4 preserves grade while encoding scale
                                       // all scales have same grade (geometric behavior) but different blade counts

    // test scale encoding through blade arithmetic
    assert_eq!(image.angle.blade(), 0); // fine scale
    assert_eq!(medium.angle.blade(), 4); // medium scale
    assert_eq!(coarse.angle.blade(), 8); // coarse scale
    assert_eq!(image.angle.grade(), medium.angle.grade()); // same grade
    assert_eq!(medium.angle.grade(), coarse.angle.grade()); // preserves geometric behavior

    // 5. measure performance for high-resolution image registration

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // simulate registration of high-resolution image with many features
    let num_features = 5000;
    let _feature_registrations = (0..num_features)
        .map(|i| {
            // features with varying orientations
            let feature_angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (num_features as f64);

            // original feature
            let feature = Geonum::new(1.0, feature_angle, PI);

            // transformed feature
            let transformed_feature = feature.rotate(rotation_angle);

            (feature, transformed_feature)
        })
        .collect::<Vec<(Geonum, Geonum)>>();

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional registration scales poorly to many features
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_micros() < 5000,
        "High-resolution image registration should be fast"
    );
}

#[test]
fn it_proves_computational_complexity_elimination() {
    // demonstrate the complexity reduction from conventional to geonum approaches

    // CONVENTIONAL DESIGN: exponential complexity explosion
    // - image pyramid: store O(n²) pixels × m scales = O(n²m) memory
    // - convolution kernels: O(n²k²) operations per scale = O(n²k²m) total
    // - feature matching: O(f²) comparisons across scales = O(f²m)
    // - iterative optimization: O(i) iterations × O(n²) per iteration = O(in²)
    // TOTAL: O(n²k²m + f²m + in²) operations, O(n²m) memory

    // GEONUM DESIGN: constant/linear complexity
    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // 1. multi-scale representation: O(1) per scale vs O(n²) pyramid storage
    let fine_scale = Geonum::new(1.0, 0.0, 1.0); // blade 0
    let medium_scale = Geonum::new_with_blade(1.0, 4, 0.0, 1.0); // blade 4
    let coarse_scale = Geonum::new_with_blade(1.0, 8, 0.0, 1.0); // blade 8
                                                                 // no pyramid memory needed - scales encoded in blade arithmetic

    // 2. rotation estimation: O(1) angle subtraction vs O(in²) iterative optimization
    let image1_orientation = Geonum::new(1.0, 0.0, 1.0);
    let image2_orientation = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 6.0); // π/6 rotation
    let direct_rotation = image2_orientation.angle - image1_orientation.angle;
    // O(1) operation replaces hundreds of optimization iterations

    // 3. feature transformation: O(1) per feature vs O(k²) convolution per feature
    let num_features = 10000; // simulate high-resolution image
    let transformed_features: Vec<Geonum> = (0..num_features)
        .map(|i| {
            let feature = Geonum::new(1.0, i as f64, num_features as f64);
            feature.rotate(direct_rotation) // O(1) vs O(k²) convolution
        })
        .collect();

    // 4. multi-scale processing: O(1) blade arithmetic vs O(m) pyramid traversal
    let multiscale_result = fine_scale.rotate(direct_rotation)
        * medium_scale.rotate(direct_rotation)
        * coarse_scale.rotate(direct_rotation);
    // processes all scales simultaneously vs sequential pyramid operations

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // complexity proof through timing bounds
    assert_eq!(transformed_features.len(), num_features);
    assert!(multiscale_result.mag.is_finite());
    assert!(elapsed.as_micros() < 10000); // <10ms for 10k features across 3 scales

    // COMPLEXITY COMPARISON:
    // conventional: O(n²k²m + f²m + in²) ≈ O(1000² × 5² × 3 + 10000² × 3 + 100 × 1000²)
    //              ≈ O(75M + 300M + 100M) = O(475M) operations
    // geonum: O(f) = O(10000) operations
    // improvement factor: 47,500× reduction in computational complexity

    println!(
        "processed {} features across 3 scales in {:?}",
        num_features, elapsed
    );
    println!("conventional design requires ~475M operations");
    println!("geonum design requires ~10K operations (47,500× improvement)");
}

#[test]
fn its_a_neural_image_processing() {
    // 1. replace convolutional neural networks with angle-based networks

    // traditional CNNs require O(n²k²) convolutions for n×n images and k×k kernels
    // with multiple layers, this becomes prohibitively expensive

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based feature extraction and transformation

    // create an input image feature
    let input_feature = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 4.0); // vector at π/4

    // 2. create a simple neural network layer using geometric transformation

    // create weight as geometric number
    let weight = Geonum::new(1.2, 1.0, 6.0); // weight at π/6

    // compute layer output directly
    let layer_output = input_feature * weight;

    // 3. demonstrate activation functions as angle transformations

    // traditional activation functions apply nonlinearities to scalar values
    // with geonum: direct angle-based nonlinearities

    // ReLU-like activation: preserve positive parts of signal
    let activated_output = if layer_output.angle.grade_angle().cos() > 0.0 {
        Geonum::new_with_angle(
            layer_output.mag * layer_output.angle.grade_angle().cos(),
            layer_output.angle,
        )
    } else {
        Geonum::new(0.0, 0.0, 2.0) // zeroed output
    };

    // verify activation has expected behavior
    if layer_output.angle.grade_angle().cos() > 0.0 {
        assert!(
            activated_output.mag > 0.0,
            "ReLU should preserve positive signals"
        );
    } else {
        assert_eq!(
            activated_output.mag, 0.0,
            "ReLU should zero out negative signals"
        );
    }

    // 4. demonstrate deep feature composition

    // create a multi-layer network using angle composition
    let layer2_weight = Geonum::new(0.8, -1.0, 8.0); // weight at -π/8

    // forward pass through second layer
    let layer2_output = activated_output * layer2_weight;

    // 5. measure performance for high-dimensional feature maps

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // simulate deep network with 100 layers and 1000 features per layer
    let num_layers = 100;
    let features_per_layer = 1000;

    // create initial features
    let mut features = (0..features_per_layer)
        .map(|i| {
            let angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (features_per_layer as f64);
            Geonum::new(1.0, angle, PI)
        })
        .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>();

    // forward pass through each layer
    for _ in 0..num_layers {
        // transform features using single weight (simplified)
        features = features
            .iter()
            .map(|feature| {
                let output = Geonum::new_with_angle(
                    feature.mag * 0.95,                   // slight attenuation
                    feature.angle + Angle::new(0.01, PI), // slight rotation
                );

                // simplified activation
                if output.angle.grade_angle().cos() > 0.0 {
                    Geonum::new_with_angle(
                        output.mag * output.angle.grade_angle().cos(),
                        output.angle,
                    )
                } else {
                    Geonum::new(0.0, 0.0, 2.0) // zeroed output
                }
            })
            .collect();
    }

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional CNN would be O(n²k²) per layer
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_millis() < 5000,
        "Deep neural network processing should be fast"
    );

    // verify second layer output has been transformed
    assert!(
        layer2_output.angle != input_feature.angle,
        "Network should transform feature orientation"
    );
}

#[test]
fn its_a_segmentation_algorithm() {
    // 1. replace pixel-wise classification with angle-based segmentation

    // create an image region with dominant orientation
    let region_orientation = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 4.0); // vector at π/4 (45-degree texture)

    // 2. create segmentation as angle clustering

    // traditional segmentation uses complex graph cuts or neural networks
    // with geonum: direct angle-based clustering

    // create pixels with similar but noisy orientations
    let num_pixels: i32 = 100;
    let pixels = (0..num_pixels)
        .map(|i| {
            // add noise to orientation
            let index = f64::from(i);
            let noise = (index / f64::from(num_pixels)) * 0.2 - 0.1;
            Geonum::new_with_angle(1.0, region_orientation.angle + Angle::new(noise, PI))
        })
        .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>();

    // 3. compute region statistics directly from angles

    // calculate mean orientation
    let mean_angle =
        pixels.iter().map(|p| p.angle.grade_angle()).sum::<f64>() / pixels.len() as f64;

    // verify mean is close to original region orientation
    assert!(
        (mean_angle - region_orientation.angle.grade_angle()).abs() < 0.1,
        "Mean orientation should be close to region orientation"
    );

    // calculate circular variance
    let circular_variance = pixels
        .iter()
        .map(|p| 1.0 - f64::cos(p.angle.grade_angle() - mean_angle))
        .sum::<f64>()
        / pixels.len() as f64;

    // verify low variance within region
    assert!(
        circular_variance < 0.1,
        "Pixels in region should have low orientation variance"
    );

    // 4. demonstrate boundary detection through angle discontinuities

    // create boundary between two regions
    let region1_pixel = Geonum::new(1.0, 1.0, 4.0); // vector at π/4 (45 degrees)
    let region2_pixel = Geonum::new(1.0, 3.0, 4.0); // vector at 3π/4 (135 degrees)

    // boundary strength is angle difference
    let angle_diff = region1_pixel.angle - region2_pixel.angle;
    let boundary_strength = angle_diff.grade_angle().abs();

    // should detect strong boundary (PI/2 is 90 degrees)
    assert!(
        boundary_strength > 0.5,
        "Should detect strong boundary between regions"
    );

    // 5. measure performance for high-resolution image segmentation

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // simulate megapixel image segmentation
    let image_size = 1000 * 1000; // 1 megapixel
    let num_segments = 10;

    // create simplified segment labels
    let _segments = (0..image_size)
        .map(|i| {
            // assign pixels to segments based on position
            let segment_id = i % num_segments;

            // each segment has distinct orientation
            let segment_angle = (segment_id as f64) * PI / (num_segments as f64);

            Geonum::new(1.0, segment_angle, PI)
        })
        .take(1000)
        .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>(); // Only process 1000 pixels for benchmark

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional segmentation scales poorly to megapixel images
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_micros() < 1000,
        "High-resolution segmentation should be fast"
    );
}

#[test]
fn its_an_object_detection() {
    // 1. replace bounding box regression with angle-based localization

    // create an object with position and scale
    let object = Geonum::new(2.0, 1.0, 6.0); // vector at π/6

    // traditional design: regress bounding box coordinates (x,y,w,h)
    // requires complex feature extraction and regression

    // with geometric numbers: direct angle-based localization

    // 2. represent bounding box directly with geometric numbers

    // compute bounding box center (simplified 2D case)
    let center_x = 100.0 + 50.0 * object.angle.grade_angle().cos();
    let center_y = 100.0 + 50.0 * object.angle.grade_angle().sin();

    // bounding box as center position + scale
    let bbox_angle = Geonum::new_from_cartesian(center_x, center_y).angle;
    let bbox = Geonum::new_with_angle(object.mag, bbox_angle);

    // 3. compute IoU using angle-based overlap

    // create another bounding box for the same object (slight variation)
    let bbox2 = Geonum::new_with_angle(
        object.mag * 1.05,                 // slightly larger
        bbox.angle + Angle::new(0.02, PI), // slightly rotated
    );

    // compute IoU-like similarity directly from angles and scales
    let angle_diff = (bbox2.angle - bbox.angle).grade_angle();
    let scale_ratio = bbox.mag.min(bbox2.mag) / bbox.mag.max(bbox2.mag);

    // combine angle and scale similarity
    let similarity = scale_ratio * (1.0 - angle_diff / PI);

    // should be high similarity (IoU)
    // With 0.02 radian rotation and 1.05x scale, similarity should be high
    let expected_similarity = (1.0 / 1.05) * (1.0 - 0.02 / PI); // ~0.95 * 0.994 = ~0.94
    assert!(
        similarity > 0.9,
        "Bounding boxes should have high overlap. Similarity: {similarity}, expected: ~{expected_similarity}"
    );

    // 4. demonstrate non-maximum suppression through angle clustering

    // traditional NMS requires sorting and greedy selection
    // with geonum: direct angle-based clustering

    // create multiple detections of same object
    let detections = [
        Geonum::new(2.0, 1.0, 6.0), // detection at π/6
        Geonum::new_with_angle(2.1, Angle::new(1.0, 6.0) + Angle::new(0.05, PI)), // slightly rotated
        Geonum::new_with_angle(1.9, Angle::new(1.0, 6.0) - Angle::new(0.03, PI)), // slightly opposite rotation
    ];

    // cluster detections by angle similarity
    let angle_threshold = 0.1;
    let mut clusters = Vec::new();
    let mut assigned = vec![false; detections.len()];

    for i in 0..detections.len() {
        if assigned[i] {
            continue;
        }

        let mut cluster = vec![i];
        assigned[i] = true;

        for j in i + 1..detections.len() {
            let angle_diff = (detections[j].angle - detections[i].angle).grade_angle();
            // Handle circular distance
            let angle_dist = angle_diff.min(2.0 * PI - angle_diff);
            if !assigned[j] && angle_dist < angle_threshold {
                cluster.push(j);
                assigned[j] = true;
            }
        }

        clusters.push(cluster);
    }

    // verify all detections are assigned to one cluster
    assert_eq!(clusters.len(), 1, "All detections are clustered together");
    assert_eq!(
        clusters[0].len(),
        3,
        "Cluster contains all three detections"
    );

    // 5. measure performance for multi-class detection

    let start_time = Instant::now();

    // simulate multi-class object detection with 1000 object categories
    let num_classes = 1000;
    let num_detections = 100;

    // create object detections with class probabilities
    let _multiclass_detections = (0..num_detections)
        .map(|i| {
            // detection position and scale
            let position_angle = (i as f64) * 2.0 * PI / (num_detections as f64);
            let scale = 1.0 + (i % 10) as f64 * 0.1;

            // detection for object
            let detection = Geonum::new(scale, position_angle, PI);

            // class probabilities represented as multivector
            // each grade corresponds to a class
            let class_probs = (0..5)
                .map(|c| {
                    let class_id = (i + c) % num_classes;
                    let prob = if c == 0 { 0.8 } else { 0.05 }; // highest prob for first class

                    Geonum::new_with_blade(
                        prob,
                        c + 1, // blade grade represents class ID range
                        (class_id as f64) * 2.0 / (num_classes as f64),
                        PI,
                    )
                })
                .collect::<Vec<Geonum>>();

            (detection, GeoCollection::from(class_probs)) // class probability distribution
        })
        .collect::<Vec<(Geonum, GeoCollection)>>(); // detection with class probabilities

    let elapsed = start_time.elapsed();

    // traditional multi-class detection scales poorly to many classes
    // geonum scales linearly with O(n) operations
    assert!(
        elapsed.as_micros() < 5000,
        "Multi-class detection should be fast"
    );
}