1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
use crate::;
use async_trait;
/// A role-based access control policy.
///
/// `required_roles_resolver` is a closure that determines which roles are required
/// for the given (resource, action). `user_roles_resolver` extracts the subject's roles.
/// Access is granted if the subject holds at least one of the required roles.
///
/// The role identifier type is generic — any `PartialEq` type works. Use a
/// domain enum when the role set is closed (the compiler then checks role
/// names), string ids when roles are configuration-driven, or
/// [`Uuid`](uuid::Uuid)s when integrating with an external identity system.
/// The two resolver closures must agree on the same role type; it is
/// inferred from their return types.
///
/// # Example
///
/// ```rust
/// # use gatehouse::*;
/// # use uuid::Uuid;
/// #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// struct User { role_ids: Vec<Uuid> }
/// #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// struct Resource;
/// #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// struct Action;
/// #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// struct Ctx;
///
/// let editor_role = Uuid::new_v4();
///
/// let rbac = RbacPolicy::new(
/// // required_roles_resolver: which roles can access this resource/action?
/// move |_resource: &Resource, _action: &Action| vec![editor_role],
/// // user_roles_resolver: which roles does this user have?
/// |user: &User| user.role_ids.clone(),
/// );
///
/// let mut checker = PermissionChecker::new();
/// checker.add_policy(rbac);
///
/// # tokio_test::block_on(async {
/// let session = EvaluationSession::empty();
/// let authorised = User { role_ids: vec![editor_role] };
/// assert!(checker.evaluate_in_session(&session, &authorised, &Action, &Resource, &Ctx).await.is_granted());
///
/// let unauthorised = User { role_ids: vec![Uuid::new_v4()] };
/// assert!(!checker.evaluate_in_session(&session, &unauthorised, &Action, &Resource, &Ctx).await.is_granted());
/// # });
/// ```
///
/// With a domain role enum instead of `Uuid`s:
///
/// ```rust
/// # use gatehouse::*;
/// #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
/// enum Role { Admin, Editor }
/// #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// struct User { roles: Vec<Role> }
/// # #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// # struct Resource;
/// # #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
/// # struct Action;
///
/// let rbac = RbacPolicy::new(
/// |_resource: &Resource, _action: &Action| vec![Role::Admin, Role::Editor],
/// |user: &User| user.roles.clone(),
/// );
///
/// let mut checker = PermissionChecker::new();
/// checker.add_policy(rbac);
///
/// # tokio_test::block_on(async {
/// let editor = User { roles: vec![Role::Editor] };
/// assert!(checker.check(&editor, &Action, &Resource, &()).await.is_granted());
/// # });
/// ```
// `RoleId` is a free parameter on this impl rather than on the struct: it is
// pinned only by the resolver closures' `-> Vec<RoleId>` return types, so it is
// inferred at the call site instead of being fixed when the policy is stored.