exochain-consensus 0.2.0-beta

EXOCHAIN constitutional trust fabric — consensus proofs and model quorum coordination
Documentation 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57

// Copyright 2026 Exochain Foundation
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at:
//
//     https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0

/// Generates a prompt for the devil's advocate based on the synthesized consensus.
pub fn generate_advocate_prompt(question: &str, consensus: &str) -> String {
    format!(
        "The panel has reached a consensus on the following question:\nQuestion: {}\nConsensus: {}\n\nYour job is to find the strongest counterarguments, logical flaws, or edge cases that break this consensus. Be adversarial but strictly logical.",
        question, consensus
    )
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn prompt_includes_question_consensus_and_adversarial_instruction() {
        let prompt = generate_advocate_prompt(
            "Should AVC receipts emit after verification?",
            "Emit only after subject-signed action verification.",
        );

        assert!(prompt.contains("Question: Should AVC receipts emit after verification?"));
        assert!(prompt.contains("Consensus: Emit only after subject-signed action verification."));
        assert!(prompt.contains("strongest counterarguments"));
        assert!(prompt.contains("Be adversarial but strictly logical."));
    }

    #[test]
    fn prompt_is_deterministic_for_same_inputs() {
        let first = generate_advocate_prompt("question", "consensus");
        let second = generate_advocate_prompt("question", "consensus");

        assert_eq!(first, second);
    }

    #[test]
    fn prompt_changes_when_consensus_changes() {
        let first = generate_advocate_prompt("question", "first consensus");
        let second = generate_advocate_prompt("question", "second consensus");

        assert_ne!(first, second);
    }
}