1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
use ;
use Mutex;
use ;
use crate::;
/// `RunnableEvent` is a data structure that is used to represent an event that is ready to be
/// executed.
///
/// A `RunnableEvent` is essentially an index into the lattice, with additional metadata to
/// prioritize events that are ready to run.
// Implement the `Display` and `Debug` traits so that we can visualize the event.
// Implement the equality criteria for a RunnableEvent.
// Implement the Ordering for a RunnableEvent.
/// `ExecutionLattice` is a data structure that maintains [`OperatorEvent`]s in a
/// [dependency graph](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_graph) according to the partial
/// order defined.
///
/// Events can be added to the lattice using the `add_events` function, and retrieved using the
/// `get_event` function. The lattice requires a notification of the completion of the event using
/// the `mark_as_completed` function in order to unblock dependent events, and make them runnable.
///
/// # Example
/// The below example shows how to insert events into the Lattice and retrieve runnable events from
/// the lattice.
/// ```ignore
/// use erdos::node::{operator_event::OperatorEvent, lattice::ExecutionLattice};
/// use erdos::dataflow::Timestamp;
/// use futures::executor::block_on;
///
/// async fn async_main() {
/// let mut lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
///
/// // Add two events of timestamp 1 and 2 to the lattice with empty callbacks.
/// events = vec![
/// OperatorEvent::new(Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
/// true, 0, HashSet::new(), HashSet::new(), || ())
/// OperatorEvent::new(Timestamp::Time(vec![2]),
/// true, 0, HashSet::new(), HashSet::new(), || ())
/// ];
/// lattice.add_events(events).await;
///
/// // Retrieve the first event from the lattice.
/// let (event_1, event_id_1) = lattice.get_event().await.unwrap();
///
/// // If we try to retrieve another event, we get None since we haven't marked the
/// // completion of the event with timestamp 1.
/// assert_eq!(lattice.get_event().await.is_none(), true);
///
/// // Mark the first event as completed.
/// lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_1).await;
///
/// // Now, get the second event from the lattice.
/// let (event_2, event_id_2) = lattice.get_event().await.unwrap();
/// }
///
/// fn main() {
/// block_on(async_main());
/// }
/// ```
/*
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
use super::*;
use crate::dataflow::Timestamp;
use futures::executor::block_on;
/// Test that a leaf gets added correctly to an empty lattice and that we can retrieve it from
/// the lattice.
#[test]
fn test_leaf_addition() {
let lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
let events = vec![OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
)];
block_on(lattice.add_events(events));
// Ensure that the correct event is returned by the lattice.
let (event, _event_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
// Ensure that only one event is returned by the lattice.
let next_event = block_on(lattice.get_event());
assert!(next_event.is_none(), "Expected no event from the lattice.");
}
/// Test that the addition of two messages of the same timestamp leads to no dependencies.
#[test]
fn test_concurrent_messages() {
let lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
let events = vec![
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
];
block_on(lattice.add_events(events));
// Check the first event is returned correctly by the lattice.
let (event, _event_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
// Check that the other event is returned without marking the first one as completed.
// This shows that they can be executed concurrently.
let (event_2, _event_id_2) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event_2.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
}
/// Test that the addition of two messages of same timestamp, with their watermark ensures that
/// the watermark runs after both of the messages are marked as finished executing.
#[test]
fn test_watermark_post_concurrent_messages() {
let lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
let events = vec![
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
];
block_on(lattice.add_events(events));
// Check that the first event is returned correctly by the lattice.
let (event, event_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]) && !event.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
// Check that the first event is returned correctly by the lattice.
let (event_2, event_id_2) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_2.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]) && !event.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
let no_event = block_on(lattice.get_event());
assert!(no_event.is_none(), "Expected no event from the lattice.");
// Mark one of the event as completed, and still don't expect an event.
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id));
let no_event_2 = block_on(lattice.get_event());
assert!(no_event_2.is_none(), "Expected no event from the lattice.");
// Mark the other as completed and expect a Watermark.
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_2));
let (event_3, _event_id_3) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_3.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]) && event_3.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
}
/// Test that the addition of three watermark messages in reverse order, leads to them being
/// executed in the correct order.
#[test]
fn test_unordered_watermark() {
let lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
let events = vec![
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![3]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![2]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
];
block_on(lattice.add_events(events));
let (event, event_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id));
let (event_2, event_id_2) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event_2.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![2 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_2));
let (event_3, _event_id_3) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event_3.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![3 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
}
/// Test that the addition of messages of different timestamps leads to concurrent execution.
#[test]
fn test_concurrent_messages_diff_timestamps() {
let lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
let events = vec![
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![3]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![2]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
];
block_on(lattice.add_events(events));
let (event, _event_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
let (event_2, _event_id_2) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event_2.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![2 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
let (event_3, _event_id_3) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event_3.timestamp,
Timestamp::Time(vec![3 as u64]),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
}
/// Test that concurrent messages are followed by their watermarks.
#[test]
fn test_concurrent_messages_watermarks_diff_timestamps() {
let lattice: ExecutionLattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
let events = vec![
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![3]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![2]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![1]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![2]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![3]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| (),
),
];
block_on(lattice.add_events(events));
let (event, event_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]) && !event.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
let (event_2, event_id_2) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_2.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![2 as u64]) && !event_2.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
let (event_3, event_id_3) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_3.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![3 as u64]) && !event_3.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id));
let (event_4, event_id_4) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_4.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![1 as u64]) && event_4.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_4));
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_2));
let (event_5, event_id_5) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_5.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![2 as u64]) && event_5.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_3));
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_5));
let (event_6, event_id_6) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
event_6.timestamp == Timestamp::Time(vec![3 as u64]) && event_6.is_watermark_callback,
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_id_6));
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"The wrong event was returned by the lattice."
);
}
/// Tests that duplicate events do not end up in the lattice's leaves or
/// run queue. This can happen if duplicate edges exist in the dependency
/// graph.
#[test]
fn test_no_duplicates() {
let lattice = ExecutionLattice::new();
// Add 2 operators that can run concurrently.
let initial_events = vec![
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![0]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| {},
),
OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![0]),
false,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| {},
),
];
block_on(lattice.add_events(initial_events));
// Generate events A and B where B precedes A.
let event_a = OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![0]),
true,
20,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| {},
);
let event_b = OperatorEvent::new(
Timestamp::Time(vec![0]),
true,
0,
HashSet::new(),
HashSet::new(),
|| {},
);
assert!(event_a > event_b, "Event B must precede event A.");
// Insert events in reverse order. Due to how the traversal of the
// dependency graph is performed, this can result in duplicate edges
// when using vectors instead of sets to store an inserted event's
// parents and children. Duplicate edges may result in duplicate
// attempts to run the same event.
block_on(lattice.add_events(vec![event_a]));
block_on(lattice.add_events(vec![event_b]));
// Dependency graph should be:
// -> C
// A -> B
// -> D
// Run events C and D
let (event_1, event_1_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
let (event_2, event_2_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert!(
!event_1.is_watermark_callback,
"Should process events C and D before watermark callbacks."
);
assert!(
!event_2.is_watermark_callback,
"Should process events C and D before watermark callbacks."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"No other events should run until C and D complete."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_1_id));
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"No other events should run until C and D complete."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_2_id));
// Run event B.
let (event_b, event_b_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
event_b.priority, 0,
"Event B should run after events C and D."
);
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"A should not run until B completes."
);
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_b_id));
// Run event A.
let (_event_a, event_a_id) = block_on(lattice.get_event()).unwrap();
block_on(lattice.mark_as_completed(event_a_id));
// No more events should be in the lattice.
assert!(
block_on(lattice.get_event()).is_none(),
"There should be no more events in the lattice."
);
}
}
*/