1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
/*!
Naïve Bayes examples
# Naïve Bayes
The naïve bayes assumption is that all features in the labelled data are independent of each other
given the class they correspond to. This means the probability of some input given a class
can be computed as the product of each individual feature in that input conditioned on that class.
By Baye's Theorum we can relate the probability of the class given the input to the probability
of the input given the class. As a classifier only needs to determine which class some input
is most likely to be we can compare just the product of the probability of the input given a class
and the probability of that class.
## Bayes' Theorum
posterior = ( prior x likelihood ) / evidence
P(C<sub>k</sub> | **x**) = ( P(C<sub>k</sub>) * P(**x** | C<sub>k</sub>) ) / P(**x**)
P(C<sub>k</sub> | **x**) ∝ P(C<sub>k</sub>) * P(**x** | C<sub>k</sub>)
where C<sub>k</sub> is the kth class and **x** is the input to classify.
## Classifier
taking logs on Bayes' rule yields
log(P(C<sub>k</sub> | **x**)) ∝ log(P(C<sub>k</sub>)) + log(P(**x** | C<sub>k</sub>))
given the naïve bayes assumption
log(P(C<sub>k</sub> | **x**)) ∝ log(P(C<sub>k</sub>)) + the sum over all i features of (log(P(x<sub>i</sub> | C<sub>k</sub>)))
Then to determine the class we take the class corresponding to the largest
log(P(C<sub>k</sub> | **x**)).
Computing the individual probabilities of a feature conditioned on a class depends on what the
type of data is.
For categorical data this is simply occurances in class / total occurances. In practise laplacian
smoothing (adding one occurance for each class to the computed probabilities) may be used to
avoid computing a probability of 0 when some category doesn't have any samples for a class.
For continuous data we can model the feature as distributed according to a Gaussian distribution.
## Simple Naïve Bayes Example with F-1 score analysis
Naïve Bayes can be done by hand (with a calculator) which is what the below example will show.
We have a list of data about the environment and want to predict if we should go outside based
on the conditions. Some of these are categorical values and others are real valued.
```
use easy_ml::distributions::Gaussian;
use easy_ml::linear_algebra;
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Debug)]
enum Weather {
Stormy, Rainy, Cloudy, Clear, Sunny
}
type WindSpeed = f64;
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Debug)]
enum Pandemic {
Pandemic, NoPandemic
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Debug)]
enum Decision {
GoOut, StayIn
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Debug)]
struct Observation {
weather: Weather,
wind: WindSpeed,
pandemic: Pandemic,
decision: Decision,
}
impl Observation {
fn new(
weather: Weather, wind: WindSpeed, pandemic: Pandemic, decision: Decision
) -> Observation {
Observation {
weather,
wind,
pandemic,
decision
}
}
}
let observations = vec![
Observation::new(Weather::Clear, 0.5, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Clear, 0.9, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Clear, 0.8, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Stormy, 0.7, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.1, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.5, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.6, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.7, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Cloudy, 0.3, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Cloudy, 0.5, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Cloudy, 0.2, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Cloudy, 0.8, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.3, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.9, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.5, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.5, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.5, Pandemic::Pandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Clear, 0.1, Pandemic::Pandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Clear, 0.9, Pandemic::Pandemic, Decision::StayIn)
];
fn predict(
observations: &Vec<Observation>, weather: Weather, wind: WindSpeed, pandemic: Pandemic
) -> Decision {
let total = observations.len() as f64;
// first compute the number of each class in the data
let total_stay_in = observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::StayIn)
.count() as f64;
let total_go_out = observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::GoOut)
.count() as f64;
let weather_log_probability_stay_in = {
// compute how many rows in the data are this weather and stay in
let total = observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::StayIn)
.filter(|observation| observation.weather == weather)
.count() as f64;
// there are 5 variants for the weather and we use laplacian smoothing
// to avoid introducing zero probabilities, +1 / +5 treats the data
// as if there is one stay in for each weather type.
((total + 1.0) / (total_stay_in + 5.0)).ln()
};
let weather_log_probability_go_out = {
// compute how many rows in the data are this weather and go out
let total = observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::GoOut)
.filter(|observation| observation.weather == weather)
.count() as f64;
// there are 5 variants for the weather and we use laplacian smoothing
// to avoid introducing zero probabilities, +1 / +5 treats the data
// as if there is one go out for each weather type.
((total + 1.0) / (total_go_out + 5.0)).ln()
};
// we're modelling the wind as a Gaussian so we get a probability by
// computing the probability density for the wind we have, if it is
// the same as the mean wind for stay in then it will be closest to 1
// and the further away the closer to 0 it will be
let wind_speed_model_stay_in: Gaussian<WindSpeed> = Gaussian::approximating(
observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::StayIn)
.map(|observation| observation.wind)
);
let wind_log_probability_stay_in = wind_speed_model_stay_in.probability(&wind);
let wind_speed_model_go_out: Gaussian<WindSpeed> = Gaussian::approximating(
observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::GoOut)
.map(|observation| observation.wind)
);
let wind_log_probability_go_out = wind_speed_model_go_out.probability(&wind);
let pandemic_log_probability_stay_in = {
// compute how many rows in the data are this pandemic and stay in
let total = observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::StayIn)
.filter(|observation| observation.pandemic == pandemic)
.count() as f64;
// there are 2 variants for the pandemic type and we use laplacian smoothing
// to avoid introducing zero probabilities, +1 / +2 treats the data
// as if there is one stay in for each pandemic type.
((total + 1.0) / (total_stay_in + 2.0)).ln()
};
let pandemic_log_probability_go_out = {
// compute how many rows in the data are this pandemic and go out
let total = observations.iter()
.filter(|observation| observation.decision == Decision::GoOut)
.filter(|observation| observation.pandemic == pandemic)
.count() as f64;
// there are 2 variants for the pandemic type and we use laplacian smoothing
// to avoid introducing zero probabilities, +1 / +2 treats the data
// as if there is one go out for each pandemic type.
((total + 1.0) / (total_go_out + 2.0)).ln()
};
let prior_log_probability_stay_in = total_stay_in / total;
let prior_log_probability_go_out = total_go_out / total;
let posterior_log_probability_stay_in = (
prior_log_probability_stay_in
+ weather_log_probability_stay_in
+ wind_log_probability_stay_in
+ pandemic_log_probability_stay_in
);
let posterior_log_probability_go_out = (
prior_log_probability_go_out
+ weather_log_probability_go_out
+ wind_log_probability_go_out
+ pandemic_log_probability_go_out
);
if posterior_log_probability_go_out > posterior_log_probability_stay_in {
Decision::GoOut
} else {
Decision::StayIn
}
}
let test_data = vec![
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.8, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Sunny, 0.2, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Stormy, 0.2, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Cloudy, 0.3, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.8, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.5, Pandemic::NoPandemic, Decision::GoOut),
Observation::new(Weather::Stormy, 0.6, Pandemic::Pandemic, Decision::StayIn),
Observation::new(Weather::Rainy, 0.1, Pandemic::Pandemic, Decision::StayIn),
];
let predictions = test_data.iter()
.map(|data| predict(&observations, data.weather, data.wind, data.pandemic))
.collect::<Vec<Decision>>();
println!("Test data and predictions\n{:?}", test_data.iter()
.cloned()
.zip(predictions.clone())
.collect::<Vec<(Observation, Decision)>>());
println!("Accuracy: {:?}", test_data.iter()
.zip(predictions.clone())
.map(|(data, decision)| if data.decision == decision { 1.0 } else { 0.0 })
.sum::<f64>() / (test_data.len() as f64));
// To compute Recall and Precision it is neccessary to decide which class should be
// considered the positive and which should be the negative. For medical diagnosis
// this is always diagnosing something as present. For this example we take GoOut to
// be the positive case.
// True Positives are where the model predicts the positive class when it is
// the correct decision, eg in this scenario, going outside when it should
// decide to go outside
let true_positives = test_data.iter()
.cloned()
.zip(predictions.clone())
.filter(|(data, _)| data.decision == Decision::GoOut)
.filter(|(_, decision)| decision == &Decision::GoOut)
.count() as f64;
// False Positives are when the model predicts the positive class when it is
// not the correct decision, eg in this scenario, going outside when it should
// decide to stay in
let false_positives = test_data.iter()
.cloned()
.zip(predictions.clone())
.filter(|(data, _)| data.decision == Decision::StayIn)
.filter(|(_, decision)| decision == &Decision::GoOut)
.count() as f64;
// True Negatives are when the model predicts the negative class when it is
// the correct decision, eg in this scenario, staying in when it should
// decide to stay in
// there's a pandemic and no good reason to go outside
let true_negatives = test_data.iter()
.cloned()
.zip(predictions.clone())
.filter(|(data, _)| data.decision == Decision::StayIn)
.filter(|(_, decision)| decision == &Decision::StayIn)
.count() as f64;
// False Negatives are when the model predicts the negative class when it is
// not the correct decision, eg in this scenario, staying in when it should
// decide to go outside
// there's a pandemic and no good reason to go outside
let false_negatives = test_data.iter()
.cloned()
.zip(predictions.clone())
.filter(|(data, _)| data.decision == Decision::GoOut)
.filter(|(_, decision)| decision == &Decision::StayIn)
.count() as f64;
// Precision measures how good the model is at identifying the positive
// class (you can trivially get 100% precision by never predicting the
// positive class, as this means you can't get a false positive).
let precision = true_positives / (true_positives + false_positives);
// Recall is the true positive rate which is how good the model is at
// identifying the positive class out of all the positive cases (you can
// trivially get 100% recall by always predicting the positive class).
let recall = true_positives / (true_positives + false_negatives);
// The F-1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall and
// averages them for an accuracy measure.
// In this case the two classes are roughly equally likely, so the F-1
// score and Accuracy are similar. However, if the model had learned
// to always predict GoOut, then it would still have an accuracy of
// roughly 50% because of the equal likelihood, whereas its F-1 score
// would be much lower than 50%.
let f1_score = linear_algebra::f1_score(precision, recall);
println!("F1-Score: {:?}", f1_score);
assert!(f1_score > 0.8);
```
## 3 Class Naïve Bayes Example
[See submodule for 3 Class Naïve Bayes Example](three_class)
*/