drep/analysis/

result.rs

//! What one analysis pass produced.
//!
//! A single pass over a file can produce findings AND fail to fully analyze
//! the file (a truncated response gives a partial list, an unknown severity
//! in one record fails the file, a transport error produces zero findings but
//! still surfaces as a failure). Reporting the findings while forgetting the
//! failure is the exact bug this type exists to prevent — the gate would
//! green-light a commit whenever the LLM endpoint was unreachable, which is
//! worse than having no gate at all.
//!
//! `failed_files` is a [`BTreeMap`] rather than a `Vec` because two passes
//! over the same file set must UNION, never sum. Summing counts one
//! unreachable endpoint twice, drifting the failure count up without any
//! matching file to investigate. The map's value carries the reason so the
//! caller can render something a user can act on, not just a path.
//!
//! `dropped_out_of_range` counts rather than silently drops out-of-range
//! findings so that a model which consistently reports wrong lines is
//! observable to the caller — not invisible.

use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use std::fmt;
use std::path::PathBuf;

use crate::analysis::findings::Finding;
use crate::llm::error::BackendErrorKind;

/// Why one file went unanalyzed.
///
/// A bare set of paths cannot tell a dead endpoint from a rate limit from a
/// truncated response, and the caller needs that to print something a user can
/// act on. `LlmError` already carries the detail; it used to be discarded at
/// the analyzer boundary.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum FailureReason {
    /// The endpoint was unreachable, or returned a retryable status too many
    /// times. `status` is the HTTP code when there was one.
    Transport {
        status: Option<u16>,
        message: String,
    },
    /// A non-HTTP backend failed with a structured routing class.
    Backend {
        kind: BackendErrorKind,
        message: String,
    },
    /// A response arrived and no JSON could be extracted from it.
    Unparseable(String),
    /// Cache-only review found no response for this exact prompt and provider.
    CacheMiss,
    /// A fresh semantic review was required after the configured remediation
    /// budget had already been consumed. This is fail-closed: cached reviews
    /// remain usable, but uncached code is never waved through unseen.
    ReviewLimit { completed: u32, limit: u32 },
    /// The model stopped before producing JSON, and the server said why.
    ///
    /// Distinct from [`Self::Unparseable`] because the cause is known and
    /// deterministic - an output-token cap or a content filter - so the answer
    /// is not "ask again" but "this request cannot be served as sent". `finish`
    /// is the server's own word for it, kept as a machine tag beside the human
    /// message exactly as [`Self::Transport`] keeps its status.
    ModelStopped { finish: String, message: String },
    /// The response parsed only after closing unbalanced delimiters, so it is
    /// a prefix of what the model meant to say.
    Truncated,
    /// A record in the response could not be understood - unknown severity,
    /// missing field, unusable line number.
    MalformedFinding(String),
    /// A deterministic tool that should have run could not.
    ToolUnavailable { tool: String, detail: String },
    /// A linter did not run because it would have read working-tree content the commit does not hold. `paths` are the differing files, as the user names them.
    ///
    /// Distinct from [`Self::ToolUnavailable`]: the tool is installed and
    /// configured, but in staged and branch modes it reads the working tree,
    /// and linting a staged file's uncommitted edit or a checkout that is not
    /// the pushed tip would judge content the commit does not contain - a
    /// lint-failing commit would pass. Refusing the run keeps
    /// "unanalyzed is not clean" true for the deterministic layer too.
    UncommittedChanges { tool: String, paths: Vec<PathBuf> },
    /// Machine site policy refuses to have this repository's source reviewed by
    /// a model, because a marker file is present at its root.
    ///
    /// A `FailureReason` rather than a run-level field because this is the type
    /// the whole exit-2 contract already rests on: putting the refusal in
    /// `failed_files` makes `gate`, the text failure block, the JSON `unanalyzed`
    /// array and the clean-cycle reset guard treat it correctly with no second
    /// mechanism to keep in agreement. A consumer asking "did semantic review
    /// happen" is then told no, rather than handed an empty `unanalyzed` beside
    /// exit 2.
    ///
    /// Both paths are carried because a developer meeting this for the first time
    /// reads it as a broken install unless it names the file that caused it and
    /// the policy that asked for it.
    SitePolicyRefused { marker: PathBuf, policy: PathBuf },
    /// The file on disk exceeded the read guard, so drep never read it.
    ///
    /// Distinct from [`Self::PayloadTooLarge`] because the two measure
    /// different things: this is the file's own size, checked before any I/O,
    /// and that one is the size of the text the model would have been sent.
    /// They were one variant sharing one limit, which meant `bytes` held the
    /// file size on one code path and the rendered-payload size on another -
    /// so "file is too large (330102 bytes)" could name a file that `ls`
    /// reports as 261900 bytes.
    FileTooLarge { bytes: u64, limit: u64 },
    /// The rendered LLM payload exceeded the ceiling. See [`Self::FileTooLarge`].
    PayloadTooLarge { bytes: u64, limit: u64 },
    /// The file could not be read from disk.
    Unreadable(String),
    /// The user named a file that the running command has no analyzer for.
    ///
    /// Only ever produced for an **explicitly named** path. A walk that turns
    /// up nothing analyzable is legitimately empty - `drep check .` in a
    /// documentation repository has correctly found no code. A path the user
    /// typed is different: reporting "No issues found." for a file drep
    /// declined to look at is the single failure this codebase is built to
    /// prevent, and it is the same distinction `resolve_paths` already draws
    /// for an argument that does not exist at all.
    ///
    /// `hint` names the command that *does* handle the type, when there is
    /// one. Markdown has `drep lint-docs`, so the error is a redirection
    /// rather than a dead end.
    Unsupported {
        /// The extension as written, with its dot. `None` when the file has
        /// none, which reads differently in the message.
        extension: Option<String>,
        /// What to run instead, phrased as an imperative.
        hint: Option<String>,
    },
    /// A failover chain produced no answer, with what each provider
    /// contributed.
    ///
    /// Only produced for a chain of **two or more** providers. A one-provider
    /// config - what `drep init` writes, and what almost every run uses -
    /// collapses to that provider's own reason, so it reports exactly what it
    /// did before failover existed, JSON `kind` included. The trigger is the
    /// chain's length, not the number of providers that failed: a two-provider
    /// chain stopped dead at the head by a 401 has one failure and is exactly
    /// the case where "which provider, and why did my fallback not run" is the
    /// user's live question.
    ///
    /// Keeping only the last reason would hide a dead local endpoint behind
    /// the cloud fallback's 401; keeping only the first would hide the broken
    /// fallback. A user fixing the run needs both.
    ///
    /// The list can be shorter than the chain - a 401 at the head stops it, and
    /// the providers below were never consulted.
    ChainFailed(Vec<ProviderFailure>),
}

/// One provider's contribution to a file that no provider could analyze.
///
/// `reason` is always a non-chain LLM-layer variant. That is a property of the
/// only thing that builds these: the conversion runs over one provider's
/// `LlmError`, so a nested `ChainFailed` is not merely absent but unreachable.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct ProviderFailure {
    /// Zero-based position in the chain. Rendered one-based, matching how
    /// `doctor` numbers the same list.
    pub provider: usize,
    /// The model that provider asks for.
    pub model: String,
    /// Why it did not produce an answer.
    pub reason: FailureReason,
    /// True when the provider was already demoted and was not contacted for
    /// this file. Worth reporting: a user needs to know the local endpoint has
    /// been dead since the third file, not just that the fallback then failed.
    pub skipped: bool,
}

impl FailureReason {
    /// Build an [`Self::Unsupported`] for `path`.
    ///
    /// The extension convention (leading dot, `None` when there is none) is
    /// stated here, beside the variant whose `one_line` renders it, rather than
    /// at each command that raises one. It was written out twice, which is one
    /// copy per command pointing at the other.
    pub fn unsupported(path: &std::path::Path, hint: Option<String>) -> Self {
        FailureReason::Unsupported {
            extension: path
                .extension()
                .map(|ext| format!(".{}", ext.to_string_lossy())),
            hint,
        }
    }

    /// A single line suitable for a terminal, derived from the variant.
    ///
    /// The HTTP status is rendered next to the message so a 429 is visible
    /// without the user having to match the message against a status code
    /// list. This is the load-bearing reason the `Transport` variant carries
    /// the status as a number rather than only inside the string.
    pub fn one_line(&self) -> String {
        match self {
            FailureReason::Transport {
                status: Some(code),
                message,
            } => {
                format!("LLM transport failed (HTTP {code}): {message}")
            }
            FailureReason::Transport {
                status: None,
                message,
            } => {
                format!("LLM transport failed: {message}")
            }
            FailureReason::Unparseable(message) => {
                format!("LLM response was unparseable: {message}")
            }
            FailureReason::CacheMiss => {
                "LLM review is not cached; run a normal check to warm it".to_owned()
            }
            FailureReason::ReviewLimit { completed, limit } if completed < limit => format!(
                "fresh LLM review capacity is currently reserved ({completed} completed of \
                 {limit}); wait for the in-flight review, pass `--max-review-rounds N`, or pass \
                 `--unlimited-reviews` to authorize another round"
            ),
            FailureReason::ReviewLimit { completed, limit } => format!(
                "fresh LLM review limit reached ({completed} of {limit}); raise \
                 `max_review_rounds`, pass `--max-review-rounds N`, or pass \
                 `--unlimited-reviews` to authorize another round"
            ),
            FailureReason::Backend { kind, message } => {
                format!("LLM backend {kind}: {message}")
            }
            // Deliberately says nothing about *which* command is running: both
            // `check` and `lint-docs` produce this, pointing at each other.
            FailureReason::Unsupported { extension, hint } => {
                let what = match extension {
                    Some(ext) => format!("`{ext}` files"),
                    None => "files with no extension".to_owned(),
                };
                match hint {
                    Some(hint) => format!("no analyzer for {what}: {hint}"),
                    None => format!("no analyzer for {what}"),
                }
            }
            // The message is already a sentence a user can act on; prefixing it
            // with a category would bury the actionable half.
            FailureReason::ModelStopped { message, .. } => message.clone(),
            FailureReason::Truncated => "response was truncated".to_owned(),
            FailureReason::MalformedFinding(detail) => format!("malformed finding: {detail}"),
            FailureReason::ToolUnavailable { tool, detail } => {
                format!("{tool} could not run: {detail}")
            }
            FailureReason::UncommittedChanges { tool, paths } => {
                let paths = paths
                    .iter()
                    .map(|path| crate::text::path_label_of(path))
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
                    .join(", ");
                format!(
                    "{tool} did not run: the working tree differs from the commit being checked at {paths}; before a commit, stage those changes or run `git stash --keep-index --include-untracked`; before a push, check out the pushed commit with nothing uncommitted"
                )
            }
            FailureReason::SitePolicyRefused { marker, policy } => format!(
                "semantic review is refused by site policy: {} is present (policy: {})",
                crate::text::path_label_of(marker),
                crate::text::path_label_of(policy)
            ),
            FailureReason::FileTooLarge { bytes, limit } => {
                format!("file is too large to read ({bytes} bytes; limit is {limit})")
            }
            FailureReason::PayloadTooLarge { bytes, limit } => {
                format!("the code sent for review is too large ({bytes} bytes; limit is {limit})")
            }
            FailureReason::Unreadable(detail) => format!("file could not be read: {detail}"),
            FailureReason::ChainFailed(failures) => {
                let each: Vec<String> = failures.iter().map(ProviderFailure::one_line).collect();
                // Phrased by what happened, not by a count. "All N providers
                // failed" is wrong for the case that matters most - a chain
                // stopped at the head by a 401 has one entry and more
                // providers behind it that were deliberately not asked.
                if each.is_empty() {
                    "no LLM provider analyzed this file".to_owned()
                } else {
                    format!("no LLM provider analyzed this file: {}", each.join("; "))
                }
            }
        }
    }

    /// The HTTP status, when the failure had one.
    ///
    /// Only `Transport` ever carries one. Exposed as a number rather than
    /// left inside the message because a caller has to distinguish a 429 from
    /// a 401 - the message is prose and prose gets reworded.
    pub fn status(&self) -> Option<u16> {
        match self {
            FailureReason::Transport { status, .. } => *status,
            // Deliberately not "the first attempt's status". A chain failure
            // has one status *per provider*, and flattening them to one number
            // would tell a consumer a 401 was the whole story when a 500 came
            // first. The JSON renderer exposes the per-provider list instead.
            _ => None,
        }
    }
}

impl ProviderFailure {
    /// One line naming the provider, its model, and what it said.
    pub fn one_line(&self) -> String {
        let skipped = if self.skipped {
            " (already down earlier in this run)"
        } else {
            ""
        };
        format!(
            "[{}] {}: {}{}",
            self.provider + 1,
            self.model,
            self.reason.one_line(),
            skipped
        )
    }
}

impl fmt::Display for FailureReason {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
        f.pad(&self.one_line())
    }
}

/// What one analysis pass produced.
///
/// `findings` and `failed_files` are independent axes: a file can contribute
/// findings AND be unanalyzed (a truncated response gives a partial list).
/// Reporting the findings while forgetting the failure is the exact bug this
/// type exists to prevent.
#[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct AnalysisResult {
    /// Findings the analyzer could attribute to a real line of code.
    pub findings: Vec<Finding>,
    /// Files that could not be fully analyzed, with the reason. A `BTreeMap`
    /// because two passes over the same file set must UNION, never sum —
    /// summing counts one unreachable endpoint twice.
    pub failed_files: BTreeMap<PathBuf, FailureReason>,
    /// Findings discarded because their line was not in the payload's
    /// `valid_lines`. Counted rather than silently dropped, so the drop is
    /// observable.
    pub dropped_out_of_range: usize,
}

/// Fold `src` into `dst`, keeping the reason already present on a collision.
///
/// The one statement of the failure-union rule. It was written out longhand as
/// `entry().or_insert()` at four sites - `merge` here plus three in the CLI -
/// each with its own comment re-explaining it. The two analysis layers cover
/// the same files, so the sets union rather than sum: one unreachable endpoint
/// is one failure, not two. First-wins because the reasons cannot be
/// meaningfully combined and the earlier layer saw the file first.
pub fn union_failures(
    dst: &mut BTreeMap<PathBuf, FailureReason>,
    src: BTreeMap<PathBuf, FailureReason>,
) {
    for (path, reason) in src {
        dst.entry(path).or_insert(reason);
    }
}

impl AnalysisResult {
    /// One file, one failure, no findings.
    ///
    /// The shape was hand-assembled at four call sites - `default()`, insert,
    /// return - each of which independently had to know that `findings` and
    /// `dropped_out_of_range` stay at their defaults. Forgetting the insert at
    /// any one of them reports an unanalyzed file as clean, which is the single
    /// failure this whole type exists to prevent, so it gets a constructor.
    pub fn failed(path: PathBuf, reason: FailureReason) -> Self {
        let mut result = Self::default();
        result.failed_files.insert(path, reason);
        result
    }

    /// Fold `other` into `self`: findings concatenate, `failed_files`
    /// unions, `dropped_out_of_range` sums.
    ///
    /// The merge semantics let a caller combine per-file and per-layer results
    /// without losing the failure signal.
    ///
    /// On a key collision in `failed_files`, the **first** reason wins. A
    /// file failing twice is still one failure, and the two reasons are not
    /// meaningfully combinable - the first one is at least specific to the
    /// file, while a hypothetical last-wins policy would let a later
    /// analyzer overwrite a more informative first reason with a generic
    /// one.
    pub fn merge(&mut self, other: AnalysisResult) {
        self.findings.extend(other.findings);
        // `union_failures` rather than the loop written out again: the
        // first-writer-wins rule is one decision, and two copies of it are two
        // places for it to change independently.
        union_failures(&mut self.failed_files, other.failed_files);
        self.dropped_out_of_range = self
            .dropped_out_of_range
            .saturating_add(other.dropped_out_of_range);
    }

    /// True when any file went unanalyzed.
    ///
    /// The caller maps this to process exit 2: "could not analyze" is
    /// distinct from both "clean" (exit 0) and "found issues" (exit 1),
    /// because a gate that cannot distinguish them rubber-stamps the day
    /// the LLM endpoint goes down.
    pub fn has_failures(&self) -> bool {
        !self.failed_files.is_empty()
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    /// `merge` keeps the first reason on a key collision - the documented
    /// first-writer-wins rule. A last-wins policy would silently overwrite
    /// the more informative first reason with a generic later one.
    #[test]
    fn merge_keeps_first_reason_on_key_collision() {
        let mut a = AnalysisResult::default();
        a.failed_files.insert(
            PathBuf::from("src/lib.rs"),
            FailureReason::Transport {
                status: Some(429),
                message: "rate limited".to_owned(),
            },
        );

        let mut b = AnalysisResult::default();
        b.failed_files.insert(
            PathBuf::from("src/lib.rs"),
            FailureReason::Transport {
                status: Some(500),
                message: "internal".to_owned(),
            },
        );

        a.merge(b);

        assert_eq!(a.failed_files.len(), 1);
        let reason = a.failed_files.get(&PathBuf::from("src/lib.rs")).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(
            reason,
            &FailureReason::Transport {
                status: Some(429),
                message: "rate limited".to_owned(),
            },
            "first reason wins on collision"
        );
    }

    /// A `Transport` failure with a status surfaces the code in the rendered
    /// line. The whole point of keeping the status as a number is that it
    /// reaches the user; this pins that the rendering preserves it.
    #[test]
    fn transport_render_includes_the_http_status() {
        let reason = FailureReason::Transport {
            status: Some(429),
            message: "rate limited".to_owned(),
        };
        let rendered = reason.one_line();
        assert!(
            rendered.contains("429"),
            "rendered line must contain 429, got {rendered:?}"
        );
    }

    /// A refusal names both the marker and the policy that asked for it.
    ///
    /// Pinned at the type that owns the wording, beside the `Transport`-status
    /// test, and for the same reason: the paths are carried as fields precisely so
    /// they reach the user. A developer meeting this line for the first time reads
    /// it as a broken install unless it says which file caused it and where the
    /// decision came from.
    #[test]
    fn site_policy_refusal_names_the_marker_and_the_policy_file() {
        let reason = FailureReason::SitePolicyRefused {
            marker: PathBuf::from("/work/repo/.drep-no-llm"),
            policy: PathBuf::from("/etc/drep/site.toml"),
        };
        let rendered = reason.one_line();
        assert!(
            rendered.contains("/work/repo/.drep-no-llm"),
            "must name the marker, got {rendered:?}"
        );
        assert!(
            rendered.contains("/etc/drep/site.toml"),
            "must name the policy, got {rendered:?}"
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn display_honours_formatter_width_and_alignment() {
        let reason = FailureReason::Truncated;
        assert_eq!(
            format!("{reason:>30}"),
            format!("{:>30}", reason.one_line())
        );
    }
}