drep-ai 2.7.1

//! `drep doctor` - report what drep can actually do in this repository.
//!
//! Adoption question, not a debugging one. Before trusting drep as a gate, a
//! user wants to know the real coverage here: which languages are present,
//! which of their own tools will actually run, and whether the LLM half is
//! configured.
//!
//! **Diagnostic findings never fail `doctor`.** A broken provider or missing
//! tool still returns `Ok(Exit::Clean)`; it is diagnosis, and `drep check` is
//! the gate. Ordinary I/O failures can still be returned when the report
//! itself cannot be written or the platform cannot resolve its user paths.
//!
//! All output goes through a `&mut dyn std::io::Write` so the command is
//! testable without spawning a subprocess. The tests call [`run_to`] directly
//! against a captured buffer.

use std::collections::BTreeSet;
use std::io::Write;
use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};

use anyhow::Result;
use clap::Args;

use crate::Exit;
use crate::cli::MachineFiles;
use crate::files;
use crate::languages;

mod llm;
mod site_section;

/// The header underline, exactly 60 characters wide. `write!` cannot express
/// the count cleanly, and the spec pins the exact width: a `=`-string of any
/// other length fails A2.
const HEADER_RULE: &str = "============================================================";

#[derive(Debug, Args)]
pub struct DoctorArgs {
    /// Repository or directory to report on.
    #[arg(value_name = "PATH", default_value = ".")]
    pub path: PathBuf,

    /// Config file to report on. Defaults to `drep.toml` under PATH.
    #[arg(long, value_name = "FILE")]
    pub config: Option<PathBuf>,
}

/// Run the command, writing to stdout. Diagnostic findings return
/// `Ok(Exit::Clean)`; failures to produce the report remain ordinary errors.
pub async fn run(args: &DoctorArgs) -> Result<Exit> {
    let mut out = std::io::stdout().lock();
    match run_to(&mut out, args).await {
        Ok(exit) => Ok(exit),
        // `drep doctor | head -5` closes the pipe under us. That is the
        // reader's choice, not a diagnostic failure, and turning it into exit 2
        // would contradict this command's one contract.
        Err(err) if is_broken_pipe(&err) => Ok(Exit::Clean),
        Err(err) => Err(err),
    }
}

/// Whether `err` is the reader having closed the pipe.
pub(crate) fn is_broken_pipe(err: &anyhow::Error) -> bool {
    err.downcast_ref::<std::io::Error>()
        .is_some_and(|io| io.kind() == std::io::ErrorKind::BrokenPipe)
}

/// `run`, writing to an arbitrary sink so tests can capture the report.
pub async fn run_to<W: Write>(out: &mut W, args: &DoctorArgs) -> Result<Exit> {
    run_at(
        out,
        args,
        &MachineFiles {
            auth: &crate::auth::default_path()?,
            policy: &crate::config::site::default_path(),
        },
    )
    .await
}

/// `run_to`, against a named auth store and a named site policy file.
///
/// Both are parameters for the same reason `check`, `init` and `auth` take the
/// store: they are machine-level state, and a test reading the real ones reports
/// whatever the developer happens to have installed. They arrive as one
/// [`MachineFiles`] because two adjacent `&Path` positionals are a
/// transposition the compiler cannot catch.
pub async fn run_at<W: Write>(
    out: &mut W,
    args: &DoctorArgs,
    machine: &MachineFiles<'_>,
) -> Result<Exit> {
    run_at_with_codex(out, args, machine, &crate::llm::codex::current_status).await
}

/// [`run_at`] with the Codex readiness diagnostic injected for tests.
pub(crate) async fn run_at_with_codex<W: Write>(
    out: &mut W,
    args: &DoctorArgs,
    machine: &MachineFiles<'_>,
    codex_probe: &dyn Fn() -> Result<crate::llm::codex::CodexStatus, String>,
) -> Result<Exit> {
    // `canonicalize` can fail (the path does not exist, or a parent is
    // unreadable). An unreadable path is still worth reporting on - the user
    // has typed something and wants to know what drep sees - so fall back to
    // the path as given rather than erroring out.
    let root = args
        .path
        .canonicalize()
        .unwrap_or_else(|_| args.path.clone());

    writeln!(out, "drep in {}", root.display())?;
    writeln!(out, "{HEADER_RULE}")?;

    let files = files::expand_paths(std::slice::from_ref(&root), files::is_scan_target);
    let file_refs: Vec<&Path> = files.iter().map(PathBuf::as_path).collect();
    let buckets = languages::group_by_language(&file_refs);

    if buckets.is_empty() {
        writeln!(out)?;
        writeln!(out, "No source files drep recognises were found here.")?;
        // The configuration sections still print. "Is my model configured?" is
        // the question a new user most needs answered, and a docs-only repo - or
        // one whose languages drep does not register - is exactly where they
        // are most likely to be asking it. Returning here answered it with
        // silence.
        write_configuration(out, args, &root, &files, machine, codex_probe).await?;
        return Ok(Exit::Clean);
    }

    write_languages_section(out, &buckets)?;
    // The missing list falls out of the same pass that printed the tool
    // lines. Recomputing it afterwards meant asking `tool_status` twice per
    // tool - each call stats the config files and walks PATH - and, worse,
    // left room for the summary to disagree with the lines above it.
    let missing = write_tools_section(out, &buckets, &root)?;
    write_configuration(out, args, &root, &files, machine, codex_probe).await?;

    // Deliberately last, after the LLM block: the user reads their coverage
    // report before being told what is wrong with it.
    if let Some(line) = missing_tools_line(&missing) {
        writeln!(out)?;
        writeln!(out, "{line}")?;
    }

    Ok(Exit::Clean)
}

/// The two configuration blocks, in the one order they are ever printed in.
///
/// Called from both report shapes so that order is stated once. The policy block
/// comes first because it governs the chain the block below it describes, and the
/// policy file is loaded once here rather than in each block: two loads of the
/// same file could disagree about it within one report.
///
/// The marker refusal is evaluated here too, through the same
/// `SiteConfig::refusal_among` the gate consults and against the directories of
/// the source files doctor found, so the report cannot describe a policy that
/// would behave differently at the gate. Its error is carried rather than
/// propagated: `drep check` fails closed on a policy it cannot evaluate, and this
/// is the command someone runs to find out why.
///
/// The answer is then handed to the LLM block, because a refusal governs it too:
/// `check` never mints a credential for a refused repository, and a `doctor` that
/// ran the helper anyway would prompt for an approval - and spend a real
/// credential call - on behalf of a repository whose review is refused.
async fn write_configuration<W: Write>(
    out: &mut W,
    args: &DoctorArgs,
    root: &Path,
    source_files: &[PathBuf],
    machine: &MachineFiles<'_>,
    codex_probe: &dyn Fn() -> Result<crate::llm::codex::CodexStatus, String>,
) -> Result<()> {
    let site = crate::config::site::load(machine.policy);
    let in_effect = site.as_ref().ok().and_then(Option::as_ref);
    let refusal = match in_effect {
        Some(site) => {
            let directories = doctor_policy_directories(root, source_files);
            site.refusal_among(&directories, machine.policy).await
        }
        None => Ok(None),
    };
    site_section::write_site_section(out, machine.policy, &site, &refusal)?;
    llm::write_llm_section(
        out,
        args,
        root,
        machine.auth,
        in_effect,
        Semantic::of(&site, &refusal),
        codex_probe,
    )
    .await
}

/// Repository-discovery starting points for the source doctor found.
///
/// `files::expand_paths` walks nested repositories, so asking only `root`
/// reports permission for a run that `check` refuses on an inner file. When no
/// recognized source exists, keep the root-level diagnostic: an operator still
/// needs to see that this checkout is marked even though there is currently no
/// semantic payload.
fn doctor_policy_directories(root: &Path, source_files: &[PathBuf]) -> BTreeSet<PathBuf> {
    if source_files.is_empty() {
        return BTreeSet::from([root.to_path_buf()]);
    }
    source_files
        .iter()
        .filter_map(|file| file.parent().map(Path::to_path_buf))
        .collect()
}

/// What the policy said about semantic review in this repository.
///
/// Three states, because the LLM block used to be told two. It received a
/// `bool` computed as `matches!(refusal, Ok(Some(_)))`, next to an
/// `Option<&SiteConfig>` computed as `site.as_ref().ok().flatten()`, and both
/// flattens sent the same answer for "permitted" and for "could not be
/// evaluated": a policy file that would not load, and a marker probe whose
/// repository root would not resolve. `check` exits 2 on either
/// (`config::site::load`'s `?` in `check::run_against`, and
/// `SiteConfigError::MarkerRootUnresolved`), so answering "not refused" is how
/// `doctor` came to run `api_key_command` - spending a real credential call and
/// triggering whatever approval sits behind it - for a repository whose review
/// never happens, and then print that the credential works. A check that did not
/// run, reported as a pass, in the command whose whole contract is what will
/// actually run here.
///
/// The policy itself still travels separately, because the concurrency clamp is
/// reported from it in every one of these states: a ceiling still applies to a
/// repository whose semantic review is refused.
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
pub(super) enum Semantic {
    /// No policy, or a policy that permits this repository. The only state in
    /// which anything here may spend a credential.
    Permitted,
    /// A marker refuses semantic review at this repository's root.
    Refused,
    /// The policy could not be evaluated. `check` fails closed; this command
    /// exists to say why, not to proceed as though it had.
    Unevaluable,
}

impl Semantic {
    /// Why semantic setup is not attempted, when policy did not permit it.
    pub(super) fn skip_reason(self) -> Option<&'static str> {
        match self {
            Self::Permitted => None,
            Self::Refused => {
                Some("not attempted, because site policy refuses semantic review here")
            }
            Self::Unevaluable => {
                Some("not attempted, because the site policy above could not be evaluated")
            }
        }
    }

    /// Collapse the two results the report already holds into the one verdict
    /// that governs whether a credential may be spent.
    ///
    /// A load failure is checked before a probe failure only because the probe
    /// cannot have run without a loaded policy; either one is the same answer.
    fn of(
        site: &Result<
            Option<crate::config::site::SiteConfig>,
            crate::config::site::SiteConfigError,
        >,
        refusal: &Result<
            Option<crate::config::site::Refusal>,
            crate::config::site::SiteConfigError,
        >,
    ) -> Self {
        match (site, refusal) {
            (Err(_), _) | (_, Err(_)) => Self::Unevaluable,
            (Ok(_), Ok(Some(_))) => Self::Refused,
            (Ok(_), Ok(None)) => Self::Permitted,
        }
    }
}

/// Build the trailing "configured tool(s) are missing" line, or `None` when
/// there is nothing to report.
///
/// Extracted so A4 can pin the rendering independently of the runner's
/// availability on a particular developer machine.
fn missing_tools_line(missing: &[&str]) -> Option<String> {
    if missing.is_empty() {
        return None;
    }
    Some(format!(
        "{} configured tool(s) are missing: {}. drep exits 2 rather than reporting those files clean.",
        missing.len(),
        missing.join(", "),
    ))
}

/// `Languages found:` block, one line per detected language.
fn write_languages_section<W: Write>(
    out: &mut W,
    buckets: &[(&'static languages::spec::LanguageSupport, Vec<&Path>)],
) -> Result<()> {
    writeln!(out)?;
    writeln!(out, "Languages found:")?;
    for (language, paths) in buckets {
        writeln!(out, "  {}: {} file(s)", language.display_name, paths.len())?;
    }
    Ok(())
}

/// `Deterministic checks (these gate):` block. Tool status comes from
/// `runner::tool_status` so `doctor` cannot disagree with `check` about
/// whether a tool will run.
///
/// Returns the names of the tools that were `Unavailable`, so the trailing
/// summary is built from the same statuses that were printed rather than from
/// a second round of `tool_status` calls.
fn write_tools_section<W: Write>(
    out: &mut W,
    buckets: &[(&'static languages::spec::LanguageSupport, Vec<&Path>)],
    root: &Path,
) -> Result<Vec<&'static str>> {
    writeln!(out)?;
    writeln!(out, "Deterministic checks (these gate):")?;
    let mut missing: Vec<&'static str> = Vec::new();
    for (language, paths) in buckets {
        if language.tools.is_empty() {
            writeln!(out, "  {}: no tools wired up yet", language.display_name)?;
            continue;
        }
        for spec in language.tools {
            let roots: BTreeSet<PathBuf> = paths
                .iter()
                .filter_map(|path| languages::runner::configuration_root(spec, root, path))
                .collect();
            let outcome = if roots.is_empty() {
                languages::runner::tool_status(spec, root)
            } else {
                workspace_tool_status(spec, root, &roots)
            };
            writeln!(out, "  {}: {}", spec.name, outcome.detail)?;
            // `Skipped` is the project exercising a choice, not a problem.
            // Rendering it as one trains users to ignore the report.
            if matches!(outcome.status, languages::runner::ToolStatus::Unavailable)
                && !missing.contains(&spec.name)
            {
                // Deduplicated: `eslint` belongs to both JavaScript and
                // TypeScript, so a repo with both and no eslint binary
                // otherwise reported "2 configured tool(s) are missing:
                // eslint, eslint" - a count that overstates the problem and a
                // list that reads like a bug.
                missing.push(spec.name);
            }
        }
    }
    Ok(missing)
}

fn workspace_tool_status(
    spec: &'static languages::spec::ToolSpec,
    root: &Path,
    roots: &BTreeSet<PathBuf>,
) -> languages::runner::ToolOutcome {
    let statuses: Vec<_> = roots
        .iter()
        .map(|workspace| languages::runner::tool_status_at(spec, root, workspace))
        .collect();
    if let Some(unavailable) = statuses
        .iter()
        .find(|outcome| matches!(outcome.status, languages::runner::ToolStatus::Unavailable))
    {
        return unavailable.clone();
    }
    let detail = if roots.len() == 1 && roots.contains(&root.to_path_buf()) {
        "ready".to_owned()
    } else {
        format!("ready in {} workspace(s)", roots.len())
    };
    languages::runner::ToolOutcome {
        tool: spec.name,
        status: languages::runner::ToolStatus::Ok,
        findings: Vec::new(),
        detail,
        compilation_succeeded: false,
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod unit_tests;

/// Acceptance tests live in their own directory under `tests/`, declared
/// from this module. The directory has its own `mod.rs` so the files there
/// are reachable by name - a Rust file no `mod` declaration reaches is never
/// compiled, and a test file that is never compiled looks exactly like a
/// passing one.
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests;