drep/llm/chain.rs
1//! The provider chain: an ordered list of LLM providers, tried in turn.
2//!
3//! drep 2.0 dropped the circuit breaker and the rate limiter as server-shaped
4//! complexity. Failover is the same category of machinery and is taken anyway,
5//! for one specific failure that happens in practice: a local endpoint that is
6//! off blocks **every** commit, because "could not analyze" is a hard stop by
7//! design. The bar it had to clear is recorded in `docs/rust-migration.md`
8//! rather than left implicit here.
9//!
10//! ## Two independent questions about a failure
11//!
12//! - `should_failover` — does the next provider get asked? HTTP transport
13//! failures advance the chain for 408, 429, 5xx and status-less failures
14//! (timeout, connection refused, an empty body). A backend may also report a
15//! typed usage-limit failure. A 401/403 or backend authentication failure
16//! must **not** advance: that is misconfiguration, and quietly asking a
17//! second provider masks it. An unparseable non-empty response advances only
18//! after its own three response attempts.
19//! - `is_sticky` — is the failure remembered for the rest of the run? Every
20//! endpoint-level failure that advances the chain, plus the two that are a property of the
21//! connection rather than the request: a stale API key returns 401 for every
22//! file, and re-handshaking forty-nine times to be told so again is pure
23//! wall-clock on a commit gate that is going to exit 2 anyway. A *request*
24//! -level 4xx is deliberately excluded - remembering one would let a single
25//! oversized payload stop the chain for every later file.
26//! Unparseable output is excluded for the same reason: it belongs to one
27//! model response, even though a fallback may salvage that file.
28//!
29//! Conflating the two is what makes a chain either mask a bad key or re-ask a
30//! dead endpoint once per file. A remembered failure is then replayed through
31//! `should_failover` exactly as a live one would be, so a demoted 401 still
32//! stops the chain and a demoted 500 still advances it.
33//!
34//! An **empty** response does fail over. It reaches here as
35//! `Transport { status: None }` only after the SDK has already retried it, and
36//! a provider that keeps answering with nothing is as unusable as one that is
37//! down - which is exactly the flakiness that failed 7 of 49 files on drep's
38//! own first gated push. It also produced zero output tokens, so the attempts
39//! it burned cost almost nothing.
40//!
41//! ## The cache key moves with the provider
42//!
43//! The key is computed from the provider's *backend identity and* model, so it is
44//! computed **inside** the loop, once per provider tried. Keying provider 1 and
45//! then letting provider 2 serve the answer would file that answer under a key
46//! it did not come from, and a later run with provider 1 healthy would get a
47//! hit that never came from provider 1. [`Served::key`] is the key of the
48//! provider that actually answered; the caller stores under that key or not at
49//! all.
50//!
51//! The backend is in the key because a model name is not an identity: one model
52//! served locally, through an API and through a ChatGPT subscription can have
53//! the same name while producing three distinct request paths.
54
55use std::sync::OnceLock;
56use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
57
58use crate::config::LlmConfig;
59use crate::llm::backend::{BackendFactory, ProviderBackend};
60use crate::llm::cache::{Cache, CacheKey};
61use crate::llm::concurrency::Limiter;
62use crate::llm::error::{BackendErrorKind, LlmError};
63use crate::llm::json_parsing::Extracted;
64
65/// One provider: a backend, its concurrency budget, and the
66/// two pieces of run-scoped state that belong to it.
67///
68/// The limiter is per provider rather than per process because the slot
69/// represents in-flight backend work, and `max_concurrent`
70/// is configured per `[[llm]]` entry. A single shared limiter would apply the
71/// local model's generous budget to a rate-limited cloud endpoint.
72///
73/// `down` and `served` live here rather than in vectors parallel to the
74/// provider list. Parallel vectors force a length invariant the type system
75/// cannot check, and make every reader defensive about an index that is
76/// structurally always valid — a `mark_down` that silently did nothing on an
77/// out-of-range index would be invisible.
78///
79/// The cache identity is computed once because it includes stable backend
80/// metadata such as the Codex CLI version. The model and display location stay
81/// on the backend so reporting cannot drift from the client that is used.
82#[derive(Debug)]
83pub struct Provider {
84 /// `pub(crate)` for the same reason `LlmClient`'s fields are: the test
85 /// fixtures build a chain through the production `ProviderChain::new` and
86 /// then shrink only the backoff delays, so a retry test does not spend
87 /// seconds asleep. Not part of the public API.
88 pub(crate) backend: ProviderBackend,
89 identity: String,
90 limiter: Limiter,
91 /// Why this provider was demoted, set once. `OnceLock` rather than a
92 /// `Mutex<Option<_>>` because the value is write-once and read-often, and
93 /// first-writer-wins is the semantics we want anyway — concurrent files
94 /// hitting the same dead endpoint should record the first reason, not race
95 /// to overwrite it.
96 down: OnceLock<LlmError>,
97 /// How many files this provider answered, cache hits included.
98 served: AtomicUsize,
99}
100
101impl Provider {
102 /// The model this provider asks for.
103 pub fn model(&self) -> &str {
104 self.backend.model()
105 }
106
107 /// The backend-neutral location this provider talks to.
108 pub fn location(&self) -> &str {
109 self.backend.location()
110 }
111
112 /// The concurrency budget for this provider's backend.
113 ///
114 /// Exposed because it is the only thing that can demonstrate the limiter
115 /// works: wiremock never overlaps requests, so neither an in-flight
116 /// counter nor wall-clock can tell a working limiter from a deleted one.
117 /// Observing `available()` while the analysis runs can.
118 pub fn limiter(&self) -> &Limiter {
119 &self.limiter
120 }
121
122 /// How many files this provider answered.
123 ///
124 /// Counted here rather than carried out through the analysis result and
125 /// rejoined against the chain later: the chain already knows who answered,
126 /// it is already shared for the whole process, and it already holds
127 /// per-provider interior-mutable state. A cache hit counts — the answer
128 /// still originated with that provider, and the user's code was still
129 /// reviewed by that model.
130 pub fn served(&self) -> usize {
131 self.served.load(Ordering::Relaxed)
132 }
133
134 /// Whether this provider has been demoted for the rest of the run.
135 pub fn is_down(&self) -> bool {
136 self.down.get().is_some()
137 }
138
139 /// Why it was demoted, if it was.
140 fn down_reason(&self) -> Option<&LlmError> {
141 self.down.get()
142 }
143
144 /// Demote for the rest of the run, recording why. First writer wins; a
145 /// concurrent second failure is dropped rather than overwriting the reason
146 /// a user is about to read.
147 fn mark_down(&self, err: LlmError) {
148 let _ = self.down.set(err);
149 }
150
151 fn record_served(&self) {
152 self.served.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);
153 }
154
155 /// This provider's cache key for one prompt.
156 ///
157 /// The single definition of "which key belongs to which provider". It lives
158 /// here rather than at the call site so a test cannot compute the key a
159 /// different way than production does - which is exactly how the endpoint
160 /// went missing from it: the tests spelled out `model` and `temperature` by
161 /// hand and agreed with the bug.
162 pub fn cache_key(&self, cache: &Cache, system_prompt: &str, user_content: &str) -> CacheKey {
163 cache.key(
164 system_prompt,
165 user_content,
166 &self.identity,
167 self.model(),
168 self.backend.request_identity(),
169 self.backend.temperature(),
170 )
171 }
172
173 #[cfg(test)]
174 pub(crate) fn for_test(backend: ProviderBackend, max_concurrent: usize) -> Self {
175 let identity = backend.identity();
176 Self {
177 backend,
178 identity,
179 limiter: Limiter::new(max_concurrent),
180 down: OnceLock::new(),
181 served: AtomicUsize::new(0),
182 }
183 }
184}
185
186/// One provider's contribution to a failed file.
187///
188/// `skipped` distinguishes "tried now and failed" from "already down from
189/// earlier in this run". Both are worth reporting: a user reading why a file
190/// went unanalyzed needs to know the local endpoint has been dead since file
191/// three, not just that the cloud fallback then returned a 401.
192#[derive(Debug)]
193pub struct Attempt {
194 /// Zero-based position in the chain. Rendered one-based.
195 pub provider: usize,
196 /// The model that provider asks for, for a message the user can act on.
197 pub model: String,
198 /// Why it failed.
199 pub error: LlmError,
200 /// True when this provider was already marked down and was not contacted
201 /// for this file.
202 pub skipped: bool,
203}
204
205impl Attempt {
206 fn new(index: usize, provider: &Provider, error: LlmError, skipped: bool) -> Self {
207 Self {
208 provider: index,
209 model: provider.model().to_owned(),
210 error,
211 skipped,
212 }
213 }
214}
215
216/// No provider produced an answer, with what each one contributed.
217///
218/// `attempts` is never empty: [`ProviderChain::new`] rejects an empty chain, so
219/// a file that could not be analyzed always names at least one provider. It can
220/// be *shorter* than `chain_len` — a 401 at the head stops the chain, and the
221/// providers below it were never consulted.
222///
223/// `chain_len` is carried so the caller can tell "the only provider failed"
224/// from "a chain stopped early", which are the same `attempts.len() == 1` but
225/// very different questions for the user.
226#[derive(Debug)]
227pub struct ChainError {
228 pub attempts: Vec<Attempt>,
229 pub chain_len: usize,
230}
231
232/// A response, and which provider produced it.
233///
234/// `key` is that provider's cache key - the caller stores under it, so the
235/// entry is filed against the model that actually answered.
236#[derive(Debug)]
237pub struct Served {
238 /// Zero-based position in the chain.
239 pub provider: usize,
240 /// The cache key of the provider that answered.
241 pub key: CacheKey,
242 /// What came back.
243 pub extracted: Extracted,
244 /// True when the cache answered and no request was made.
245 pub from_cache: bool,
246}
247
248/// An ordered chain of providers with sticky demotion.
249///
250/// Built once per process from `Config::providers()` and shared across the
251/// analyzer, so the demotion one file discovers is visible to every other.
252#[derive(Debug)]
253pub struct ProviderChain {
254 /// `pub(crate)` so the test fixtures can shrink the per-provider backoff.
255 /// See [`Provider`].
256 pub(crate) providers: Vec<Provider>,
257}
258
259impl ProviderChain {
260 #[cfg(test)]
261 pub(crate) fn for_test(providers: impl IntoIterator<Item = (ProviderBackend, usize)>) -> Self {
262 Self {
263 providers: providers
264 .into_iter()
265 .map(|(backend, max_concurrent)| Provider::for_test(backend, max_concurrent))
266 .collect(),
267 }
268 }
269
270 /// Build a chain from the enabled providers, in order.
271 ///
272 /// A misconfigured entry is fatal rather than skipped. Skipping it would
273 /// be the same masking that the 401 rule forbids: an endpoint-less
274 /// `[[llm]]` block is a broken install, and a gate that quietly routes
275 /// around it is a gate reporting on a configuration the user did not
276 /// write. The index is carried into the message because with several
277 /// providers "LLM model is not set" does not say which one.
278 pub fn new(cfgs: &[&LlmConfig]) -> Result<Self, LlmError> {
279 if cfgs.is_empty() {
280 return Err(LlmError::NotConfigured(
281 "no enabled `[[llm]]` provider".to_string(),
282 ));
283 }
284 let mut providers = Vec::with_capacity(cfgs.len());
285 let mut factory = BackendFactory::new();
286 for (index, cfg) in cfgs.iter().enumerate() {
287 let backend = factory
288 .build(cfg)
289 .map_err(|err| LlmError::NotConfigured(format!("[[llm]] #{}: {err}", index + 1)))?;
290 let identity = backend.identity();
291 providers.push(Provider {
292 backend,
293 identity,
294 limiter: Limiter::new(cfg.max_concurrent),
295 down: OnceLock::new(),
296 served: AtomicUsize::new(0),
297 });
298 }
299 Ok(Self { providers })
300 }
301
302 /// The providers, in preference order.
303 pub fn providers(&self) -> &[Provider] {
304 &self.providers
305 }
306
307 /// Send one prompt down the chain, consulting the cache per provider.
308 ///
309 /// Returns the first answer anyone gives, or every provider's reason for
310 /// not giving one.
311 pub async fn complete_json(
312 &self,
313 system_prompt: &str,
314 user_content: &str,
315 cache: &Cache,
316 ) -> Result<Served, ChainError> {
317 let mut attempts: Vec<Attempt> = Vec::new();
318
319 for (index, provider) in self.providers.iter().enumerate() {
320 match try_provider(index, provider, system_prompt, user_content, cache).await {
321 ProviderOutcome::Served(served) => return Ok(served),
322 // One place decides what a failure means for the loop, so the
323 // three ways a provider can fail cannot disagree about it.
324 ProviderOutcome::Failed { attempt, advance } => {
325 attempts.push(attempt);
326 if !advance {
327 return Err(self.error(attempts));
328 }
329 }
330 }
331 }
332
333 Err(self.error(attempts))
334 }
335
336 /// Return the first cached answer in provider order without contacting any
337 /// backend. A miss is not a provider failure: nothing was attempted and no
338 /// provider should be demoted merely because this machine has not reviewed
339 /// the payload yet.
340 pub fn cached_json(
341 &self,
342 system_prompt: &str,
343 user_content: &str,
344 cache: &Cache,
345 ) -> Option<Served> {
346 for (index, provider) in self.providers.iter().enumerate() {
347 let key = provider.cache_key(cache, system_prompt, user_content);
348 if let Some(served) = cached_for(index, provider, &key, cache) {
349 return Some(served);
350 }
351 }
352 None
353 }
354
355 fn error(&self, attempts: Vec<Attempt>) -> ChainError {
356 ChainError {
357 attempts,
358 chain_len: self.providers.len(),
359 }
360 }
361}
362
363/// What one provider did with the request.
364enum ProviderOutcome {
365 Served(Served),
366 Failed { attempt: Attempt, advance: bool },
367}
368
369impl ProviderOutcome {
370 /// A provider skipped because it was already demoted.
371 ///
372 /// The recorded reason is replayed through [`should_failover`] exactly as a
373 /// live failure would be, so a remembered 401 stops the chain here and a
374 /// remembered 500 advances it. Deciding otherwise would let a bad key be
375 /// routed around on every file after the first.
376 fn demoted(index: usize, provider: &Provider, err: &LlmError) -> Self {
377 ProviderOutcome::Failed {
378 advance: should_failover(err),
379 attempt: Attempt::new(index, provider, err.clone(), true),
380 }
381 }
382}
383
384/// Try one provider: cache, demotion check, limiter, request.
385///
386/// A free function rather than a method because it reads no chain state — all
387/// of it now lives on the `Provider` it is handed.
388async fn try_provider(
389 index: usize,
390 provider: &Provider,
391 system_prompt: &str,
392 user_content: &str,
393 cache: &Cache,
394) -> ProviderOutcome {
395 // The key is computed here, from *this* provider's model, and the `Served`
396 // carries it back so the caller cannot file the answer under a different
397 // provider's key. A cache hit precedes demotion because it spends no
398 // backend request and remains the preferred provider's own verdict.
399 let key = provider.cache_key(cache, system_prompt, user_content);
400 if let Some(served) = cached_for(index, provider, &key, cache) {
401 return ProviderOutcome::Served(served);
402 }
403
404 // Already down: report what it said the first time rather than paying the
405 // SDK's backoff schedule to be told again.
406 if let Some(err) = provider.down_reason() {
407 return ProviderOutcome::demoted(index, provider, err);
408 }
409
410 // The slot is held for the request and released on every exit path,
411 // failover included. The cache hit above never takes one: the slot
412 // represents in-flight backend work, and a cache read is not in flight.
413 let guard = provider.limiter.acquire().await;
414
415 // Re-check after waiting. Files are analyzed concurrently, so the check
416 // above can only stop files that had not yet started; everything already
417 // queued on this provider's limiter passed it before the first failure
418 // landed. Without this second look, forty-nine files queued against a dead
419 // endpoint each pay the SDK's full retry schedule anyway, and sticky
420 // demotion saves nothing in the one case it exists for. With it, the waste
421 // is bounded by `max_concurrent` rather than by the number of files.
422 if let Some(err) = provider.down_reason() {
423 drop(guard);
424 return ProviderOutcome::demoted(index, provider, err);
425 }
426
427 let outcome = provider
428 .backend
429 .complete_json(system_prompt, user_content)
430 .await;
431 drop(guard);
432
433 match outcome {
434 Ok(extracted) => {
435 provider.record_served();
436 ProviderOutcome::Served(Served {
437 provider: index,
438 key,
439 extracted,
440 from_cache: false,
441 })
442 }
443 Err(err) => {
444 if is_sticky(&err) {
445 provider.mark_down(err.clone());
446 }
447 ProviderOutcome::Failed {
448 advance: should_failover(&err),
449 attempt: Attempt::new(index, provider, err, false),
450 }
451 }
452 }
453}
454
455/// Build the one canonical cache-hit result, including served accounting.
456fn cached_for(index: usize, provider: &Provider, key: &CacheKey, cache: &Cache) -> Option<Served> {
457 let value = cache.get(key)?;
458 provider.record_served();
459 Some(Served {
460 provider: index,
461 key: key.clone(),
462 extracted: Extracted::Complete(value),
463 from_cache: true,
464 })
465}
466
467/// Whether this failure should be handed to the next provider.
468///
469/// The whole failover policy, in one place, so the rule cannot be restated
470/// differently at a second site.
471fn should_failover(err: &LlmError) -> bool {
472 match err {
473 // No status: a timeout, a refused connection, or an empty body. All
474 // provider-level, all worth asking someone else.
475 LlmError::Transport { status: None, .. } => true,
476 LlmError::Transport {
477 status: Some(code), ..
478 } => is_retryable_status(*code),
479 // A non-empty body we could not parse already exhausted the primary's
480 // response retries. A fallback can salvage this file, but the failure
481 // remains payload/model-specific and must not demote the provider.
482 LlmError::Unparseable(_) => true,
483 // A token cap or a content filter is a property of the request. A
484 // second provider cannot make the file smaller, and asking one to is
485 // the same category error as failing over on a 400. `is_sticky` is
486 // defined in terms of this, so it is not remembered either - which
487 // matters, because remembering a non-failover failure is what let one
488 // bad file stop the chain for every later one.
489 LlmError::ModelStopped { .. } => false,
490 // Misconfiguration. Routing around it is what hides it.
491 LlmError::NotConfigured(_) => false,
492 LlmError::Backend { kind, .. } => matches!(kind, BackendErrorKind::UsageLimit),
493 }
494}
495
496/// Whether this failure is remembered for the rest of the run.
497///
498/// Deliberately a wider set than [`should_failover`]. A 401 does not advance
499/// the chain, but it is still a property of the endpoint rather than of this
500/// file: every file in the run will get the same answer, so ask once.
501fn is_sticky(err: &LlmError) -> bool {
502 // Remember a failure only when remembering it cannot change a later file's
503 // outcome. Two ways that holds:
504 //
505 // - The chain advances past this provider anyway, so skipping it costs the
506 // later file nothing it was not already going to pay.
507 // - It is a credential the endpoint rejects, which it will reject for every
508 // request regardless of payload.
509 //
510 // The combination to avoid is a request-dependent failure that is both
511 // remembered and non-failing-over: a later file would replay it and stop
512 // without contacting anyone. `Contract` is safe despite that shape because
513 // it means the process backend violated drep's fixed isolation/event
514 // protocol, never that one source payload was rejected. A request-level
515 // HTTP 400 is not safe: one oversized payload once poisoned every later
516 // file by demoting the provider for the whole run.
517 (should_failover(err) && !matches!(err, LlmError::Unparseable(_)))
518 || is_auth_failure(err)
519 || is_sticky_backend_failure(err)
520}
521
522fn is_sticky_backend_failure(err: &LlmError) -> bool {
523 matches!(
524 err,
525 LlmError::Backend {
526 kind: BackendErrorKind::Contract | BackendErrorKind::Authentication,
527 ..
528 }
529 )
530}
531
532/// Whether the endpoint rejected the credential rather than the request.
533///
534/// 401 and 403 are the two statuses that are a property of the *connection* and
535/// not of what was sent, so they are the only non-failover failures worth
536/// remembering: a stale key answers the same way for every file, and
537/// re-handshaking once per file is pure wall-clock on a gate that will exit 2
538/// regardless.
539fn is_auth_failure(err: &LlmError) -> bool {
540 matches!(
541 err,
542 LlmError::Transport {
543 status: Some(401 | 403),
544 ..
545 }
546 )
547}
548
549/// The retryable HTTP statuses.
550///
551/// 408 and 429 are the two 4xx codes that mean "ask again"; everything else in
552/// the 4xx range is the client's fault and a second provider cannot fix it.
553/// 5xx is the server's fault and another server might not have it.
554///
555/// Deliberately drep's own list rather than a claim to mirror the SDK's:
556/// open-agent-sdk's retryable set is private, and it excludes some 5xx codes
557/// (501, 505) that a *different provider* may well not return at all. The two
558/// answer different questions - "retry this endpoint" and "try another one".
559fn is_retryable_status(code: u16) -> bool {
560 matches!(code, 408 | 429) || (500..=599).contains(&code)
561}
562
563#[cfg(test)]
564mod tests;