1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
// Copyright 2024 Google LLC
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
//! Derive macros that generates both a fuzz target for use with `cargo fuzz`, and a property test
//! (via `quickcheck` or `proptest`) for use with `cargo test`.
//!
//! The reason for having both is that property testing allows for quick iteration to make sure the
//! test works, and can be checked in presubmit CI, while fuzzing can test the input space more
//! exhaustively and run continuously.
//!
//! # Example
//!
//! ```no_run
//! #![cfg_attr(fuzzing, no_main)]
//!
//! #[derive_fuzztest::fuzztest]
//! fn transitive_ord(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) {
//! if a >= b && b >= c {
//! assert!(a >= c);
//! }
//! if a <= b && b <= c {
//! assert!(a <= c);
//! }
//! }
//!
//! #[test]
//! fn additional_test_here() {
//! /* ... */
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! # Result reporting
//!
//! Test functions report test failures by panicking, similar to how you would write a regular
//! `#[test]`. If the annotated test function completes without panicking, the test is considered to
//! have passed.
//!
//! In some cases, you may want to discard some inputs, treating them neither as passes nor
//! failures, just continue onto testing another generated input. This can be done by returning a
//! [`TestResult`] from the annotated function. Property testing frameworks will try to generate
//! more test cases to replace the discarded one, up to a certain limit. For fuzzing, test results
//! that are discarded will not be added to the corpus.
//!
//! ```
//! use derive_fuzztest::TestResult;
//!
//! #[derive_fuzztest::fuzztest]
//! fn increment(a: u8) -> TestResult {
//! if a < u8::MAX {
//! assert_eq!(a + 1 - 1, a);
//! TestResult::Passed
//! } else {
//! TestResult::Discard
//! }
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! # Usage
//!
//!
//! Run the generated property tests
//! ```sh
//! cargo test
//! ```
//!
//! Run continuous fuzzing
//! ```sh
//! cargo +nightly fuzz run <binary name>
//! ```
//!
//! # Crate structure
//!
//! If you use `#[fuzz]` or `#[fuzztest]`, the fuzz target imposes the following requirements:
//!
//! * The target must be in a separate `[[bin]]` target that only contains a single fuzz target.
//! * The crate containing the bin target has `[package.metadata] cargo-fuzz = true`
//! * The bin target is annotated with `#![cfg_attr(fuzzing, no_main)]`
//!
//! The recommended structure for your crate `foo` is to put your tests under `foo/fuzz/src/bin`:
//!
//! ```text
//! foo
//! ├── fuzz
//! │ ├── src
//! │ │ └── bin
//! │ │ └── fuzz_target_1.rs
//! │ └── Cargo.toml
//! ├── src
//! │ └── [project source]
//! └── Cargo.toml
//! ```
//!
//! This is different from the default structure generated by `cargo fuzz init` or `cargo fuzz add`
//! so that we can take advantage of [target
//! auto-discovery](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/cargo-targets.html#target-auto-discovery).
//! If you prefer, the default structure generated by `cargo fuzz` can also work, but make sure you
//! remove `test = false` from the generated target in `Cargo.toml`.
//!
//! You will also need to declare a dependency on the `libfuzzer-sys` crate, but only if fuzzing is
//! requested:
//!
//! ```toml
//! [target.'cfg(fuzzing)'.dependencies]
//! libfuzzer-sys = "*"
//! ```
//!
//! (The reason for this conditional dependency is that `libfuzzer-sys` injects a main function to
//! the resulting binary, and there will be linking failures if we link that in without defining a
//! corresponding `fuzz_target`.)
//!
//! # Features
//!
//! * `quickcheck` (default) — Enable generation of
//! [`quickcheck`](https://docs.rs/quickcheck/latest/quickcheck/) property tests.
//! * `proptest` — Enable generation of [`proptest`](https://docs.rs/proptest/latest/proptest/)
//! property tests.
//!
//! #### See also
//! * [Announcing Better Support for Fuzzing with Structured Inputs in
//! Rust](https://fitzgeraldnick.com/2020/01/16/better-support-for-fuzzing-structured-inputs-in-rust.html#how-is-all-this-different-from-quickcheck-and-proptest)
//! * [Bridging Fuzzing and Property
//! Testing](https://blog.yoshuawuyts.com/bridging-fuzzing-and-property-testing/)
pub use ;
/// A test result reported from the test case.
///
/// A test case annotated with `#[fuzztest]`, `#[fuzz]`, or `#[proptest]` can optionally return a
/// `TestResult` to indicate whether a test should be treated as discarded or passed.
///
/// If the test does not have a return value, all non-panicking test cases default to passed.