crdts 7.3.2

use std::{error, fmt};

use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};

use crate::{CmRDT, CvRDT};

/// `LWWReg` is a simple CRDT that contains an arbitrary value
/// along with an `Ord` that tracks causality. It is the responsibility
/// of the user to guarantee that the source of the causal element
/// is monotonic. Don't use timestamps unless you are comfortable
/// with divergence.
///
/// `M` is a marker. It must grow monotonically *and* must be globally unique
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct LWWReg<V, M> {
    /// `val` is the opaque element contained within this CRDT
    pub val: V,
    /// `marker` should be a monotonic value associated with this val
    pub marker: M,
}

impl<V: Default, M: Default> Default for LWWReg<V, M> {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self {
            val: V::default(),
            marker: M::default(),
        }
    }
}

/// The Type of validation errors that may occur for an LWWReg.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
pub enum Validation {
    /// A conflicting change to a CRDT is witnessed by a dot that already exists.
    ConflictingMarker,
}

impl error::Error for Validation {
    fn description(&self) -> &str {
        match self {
            Validation::ConflictingMarker => {
                "A marker must be used exactly once, re-using the same marker breaks associativity"
            }
        }
    }
}

impl fmt::Display for Validation {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        write!(f, "{:?}", self)
    }
}

impl<V: PartialEq, M: Ord> CvRDT for LWWReg<V, M> {
    type Validation = Validation;

    /// Validates whether a merge is safe to perfom
    ///
    /// Returns an error if the marker is identical but the
    /// contained element is different.
    /// ```
    /// use crdts::{lwwreg, LWWReg, CvRDT};
    /// let mut l1 = LWWReg { val: 1, marker: 2 };
    /// let l2 = LWWReg { val: 3, marker: 2 };
    /// // errors!
    /// assert_eq!(l1.validate_merge(&l2), Err(lwwreg::Validation::ConflictingMarker));
    /// ```
    fn validate_merge(&self, other: &Self) -> Result<(), Self::Validation> {
        self.validate_update(&other.val, &other.marker)
    }

    /// Combines two `LWWReg` instances according to the marker that
    /// tracks causality.
    fn merge(&mut self, LWWReg { val, marker }: Self) {
        self.update(val, marker)
    }
}

impl<V: PartialEq, M: Ord> CmRDT for LWWReg<V, M> {
    // LWWReg's are small enough that we can replicate
    // the entire state as an Op
    type Op = Self;
    type Validation = Validation;

    fn validate_op(&self, op: &Self::Op) -> Result<(), Self::Validation> {
        self.validate_update(&op.val, &op.marker)
    }

    fn apply(&mut self, op: Self::Op) {
        self.merge(op)
    }
}

impl<V: PartialEq, M: Ord> LWWReg<V, M> {
    /// Updates value witnessed by the given marker.
    ///
    /// ```
    /// use crdts::LWWReg;
    /// let mut reg = LWWReg { val: 1, marker: 2 };
    ///
    /// // updating with a smaller marker is a no-op
    /// reg.update(2, 1);
    /// assert_eq!(reg.val, 1);
    ///
    /// // updating with larger marker succeeds
    /// reg.update(2, 3);
    /// assert_eq!(reg, LWWReg { val: 2, marker: 3 });
    /// ```
    pub fn update(&mut self, val: V, marker: M) {
        if self.marker < marker {
            self.val = val;
            self.marker = marker;
        }
    }

    /// An update is invalid if the marker is exactly the same as
    /// the current marker BUT the value is different:
    /// ```
    /// use crdts::{lwwreg, LWWReg};
    /// let mut reg = LWWReg { val: 1, marker: 2 };
    ///
    /// // updating with a smaller marker is a no-op
    /// assert_eq!(reg.validate_update(&32, &2), Err(lwwreg::Validation::ConflictingMarker));
    /// ```
    pub fn validate_update(&self, val: &V, marker: &M) -> Result<(), Validation> {
        if &self.marker == marker && val != &self.val {
            Err(Validation::ConflictingMarker)
        } else {
            Ok(())
        }
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_default() {
        let reg = LWWReg::default();
        assert_eq!(reg, LWWReg { val: "", marker: 0 });
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_update() {
        let mut reg = LWWReg {
            val: 123,
            marker: 0,
        };

        // normal update: new marker is a descended of current marker
        // EXPECTED: success, the val and marker are update
        reg.update(32, 2);
        assert_eq!(reg, LWWReg { val: 32, marker: 2 });

        // stale update: new marker is an ancester of the current marker
        // EXPECTED: succes, no-op
        reg.update(57, 1);
        assert_eq!(reg, LWWReg { val: 32, marker: 2 });

        // redundant update: new marker and val is same as of the current state
        // EXPECTED: success, no-op
        reg.update(32, 2);
        assert_eq!(reg, LWWReg { val: 32, marker: 2 });

        // bad update: new marker same as of the current marker but not value
        // EXPECTED: error
        assert_eq!(
            reg.validate_update(&4000, &2),
            Err(Validation::ConflictingMarker)
        );

        // Applying the update despite the validation error is a no-op
        reg.update(4000, 2);
        assert_eq!(reg, LWWReg { val: 32, marker: 2 });
    }

    #[cfg(feature = "quickcheck")]
    mod prop_tests {
        use super::*;
        use quickcheck::TestResult;
        use quickcheck_macros::quickcheck;

        #[quickcheck]
        fn prop_associative(
            r1_prim: (u8, u16),
            r2_prim: (u8, u16),
            r3_prim: (u8, u16),
        ) -> TestResult {
            let mut r1 = build_from_prim(r1_prim);
            let mut r2 = build_from_prim(r2_prim);
            let r3 = build_from_prim(r3_prim);

            let has_conflicting_marker = (r1.marker == r2.marker && r1.val != r2.val)
                || (r1.marker == r3.marker && r1.val != r3.val)
                || (r2.marker == r3.marker && r2.val != r3.val);

            if has_conflicting_marker {
                return TestResult::discard();
            }

            let mut r1_snapshot = r1.clone();

            // (r1 ^ r2) ^ r3
            r1.merge(r2.clone());
            r1.merge(r3.clone());

            // r1 ^ (r2 ^ r3)
            r2.merge(r3);
            r1_snapshot.merge(r2);

            // (r1 ^ r2) ^ r3 = r1 ^ (r2 ^ r3)
            TestResult::from_bool(r1 == r1_snapshot)
        }

        #[quickcheck]
        fn prop_commutative(r1_prim: (u8, u16), r2_prim: (u8, u16)) -> TestResult {
            let mut r1 = build_from_prim(r1_prim);
            let mut r2 = build_from_prim(r2_prim);

            if r1.marker == r2.marker && r1.val != r2.val {
                return TestResult::discard();
            }
            let r1_snapshot = r1.clone();

            // r1 ^ r2
            r1.merge(r2.clone());

            // r2 ^ r1
            r2.merge(r1_snapshot);

            // r1 ^ r2 = r2 ^ r1
            TestResult::from_bool(r1 == r2)
        }

        #[quickcheck]
        fn prop_idempotent(r_prim: (u8, u16)) -> bool {
            let mut r = build_from_prim(r_prim);
            let r_snapshot = r.clone();

            // r ^ r
            r.merge(r_snapshot.clone());
            // r ^ r = r
            r == r_snapshot
        }

        fn build_from_prim(prim: (u8, u16)) -> LWWReg<u8, (u16, u8)> {
            // we make the marker a tuple so that we avoid conflicts
            LWWReg {
                val: prim.0,
                marker: (prim.1, prim.0),
            }
        }
    }
}