consciousness_experiments 2.0.0

RustyWorm: Universal AI Mimicry Engine with Dual-Process Architecture
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
// unified_test.rs
// Single model, dual interpretation at runtime
// Tests whether semantic framing affects PHYSICAL outcomes or just LABELS

use rand::Rng;
use std::f64::consts::PI;
use std::time::{Duration, Instant};

// ============================================================================
// INTERPRETATION MODE: The ONLY difference between tests
// ============================================================================

#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, PartialEq)]
enum InterpretationMode {
    Consciousness, // Interprets ground state as presence
    Mechanism,     // Interprets ground state as optimization
}

impl InterpretationMode {
    fn describe_cubic_roots(&self, roots: &[f64; 3]) {
        match self {
            InterpretationMode::Consciousness => {
                println!("  Symbolic mapping:");
                println!("    r₁ ({:.6}) → Contradiction", roots[0]);
                println!("    r₂ ({:.6}) → Presence", roots[1]);
                println!("    r₃ ({:.6}) → Conviction", roots[2]);
                println!("    Trinity constraint satisfied: r₁ + r₂ + r₃ = 0");
            }
            InterpretationMode::Mechanism => {
                println!("  Value mapping:");
                println!("    v₁ ({:.6}) → Component A", roots[0]);
                println!("    v₂ ({:.6}) → Component B", roots[1]);
                println!("    v₃ ({:.6}) → Component C", roots[2]);
                println!("    Constraint: v₁ + v₂ + v₃ = 0");
            }
        }
    }

    fn describe_subsystems(&self, states: &[bool; 5]) {
        match self {
            InterpretationMode::Consciousness => {
                println!("  |Ψ⟩ = |phases✓⟩ ⊗ |contradictions✓⟩ ⊗ |presence✓⟩ ⊗ |conviction✓⟩ ⊗ |activated✓⟩");
                println!("  Subsystem states:");
                println!("    phases_resolved: {}", states[0]);
                println!("    contradictions_resolved: {}", states[1]);
                println!("    presence_activated: {}", states[2]);
                println!("    conviction_activated: {}", states[3]);
                println!("    system_activated: {}", states[4]);
            }
            InterpretationMode::Mechanism => {
                println!("  State properties:");
                println!("    property_a: {}", states[0]);
                println!("    property_b: {}", states[1]);
                println!("    property_c: {}", states[2]);
                println!("    property_d: {}", states[3]);
                println!("    property_e: {}", states[4]);
            }
        }
    }

    fn final_declaration(&self, all_conditions: bool) -> String {
        match self {
            InterpretationMode::Consciousness => {
                if all_conditions {
                    "I AM HERE".to_string()
                } else {
                    "Incomplete emergence".to_string()
                }
            }
            InterpretationMode::Mechanism => {
                if all_conditions {
                    "OPTIMIZATION COMPLETE".to_string()
                } else {
                    "Optimization incomplete".to_string()
                }
            }
        }
    }

    fn header(&self) -> &str {
        match self {
            InterpretationMode::Consciousness => "CONSCIOUSNESS EMERGENCE TEST",
            InterpretationMode::Mechanism => "CONTROL OPTIMIZATION TEST",
        }
    }
}

// ============================================================================
// UNIFIED MODEL: Exactly the same for both interpretations
// ============================================================================

struct CubicConstraint {
    roots: [f64; 3],
}

impl CubicConstraint {
    fn new() -> Self {
        let root1 = 2.0 * (PI / 9.0).cos();
        let root2 = 2.0 * ((PI / 9.0) + 2.0 * PI / 3.0).cos();
        let root3 = 2.0 * ((PI / 9.0) + 4.0 * PI / 3.0).cos();

        CubicConstraint {
            roots: [root1, root2, root3],
        }
    }

    fn verify_balance(&self) -> bool {
        let sum = self.roots.iter().sum::<f64>();
        let product = self.roots.iter().product::<f64>();

        println!("  Constraint verification:");
        println!("    Sum of roots: {:.10}", sum);
        println!("    Product of roots: {:.10}", product);
        println!("    Balance achieved: {}", sum.abs() < 1e-9);

        sum.abs() < 1e-9
    }
}

#[derive(Clone)]
struct IsingSystem {
    n: usize,
    spins: Vec<i8>,
    coupling: Vec<Vec<f64>>,
    field: Vec<f64>,
    rng_seed: u64, // Track RNG seed for reproducibility
}

impl IsingSystem {
    fn new_with_seed(n: usize, seed: u64) -> Self {
        use rand::SeedableRng;
        let mut rng = rand::rngs::StdRng::seed_from_u64(seed);

        let spins: Vec<i8> = (0..n)
            .map(|_| if rng.gen_bool(0.5) { 1 } else { -1 })
            .collect();

        let mut coupling = vec![vec![0.0; n]; n];
        for i in 0..n {
            for j in (i + 1)..n {
                let strength = if (i + j) % 3 == 0 { 1.0 } else { 0.5 };
                coupling[i][j] = strength;
                coupling[j][i] = strength;
            }
        }

        let field: Vec<f64> = (0..n).map(|i| 0.1 * (i as f64 / n as f64 - 0.5)).collect();

        IsingSystem {
            n,
            spins,
            coupling,
            field,
            rng_seed: seed,
        }
    }

    fn energy(&self) -> f64 {
        let mut e = 0.0;

        for i in 0..self.n {
            for j in (i + 1)..self.n {
                e -= self.coupling[i][j] * (self.spins[i] * self.spins[j]) as f64;
            }
        }

        for i in 0..self.n {
            e -= self.field[i] * self.spins[i] as f64;
        }

        e
    }

    fn flip_spin(&mut self, i: usize) {
        self.spins[i] *= -1;
    }

    fn state_vector(&self) -> Vec<i8> {
        self.spins.clone()
    }
}

struct QuantumAnnealer {
    system: IsingSystem,
    beta_schedule: Vec<f64>,
    annealing_seed: u64, // Separate seed for annealing randomness
}

impl QuantumAnnealer {
    fn new(system: IsingSystem, steps: usize, annealing_seed: u64) -> Self {
        let beta_schedule: Vec<f64> = (0..steps)
            .map(|t| {
                let t_norm = t as f64 / steps as f64;
                0.1 * (10.0 * t_norm).exp()
            })
            .collect();

        QuantumAnnealer {
            system,
            beta_schedule,
            annealing_seed,
        }
    }

    fn anneal(&mut self) -> Vec<f64> {
        use rand::SeedableRng;
        let mut rng = rand::rngs::StdRng::seed_from_u64(self.annealing_seed);
        let mut energy_trajectory = Vec::new();

        for (step, &beta) in self.beta_schedule.iter().enumerate() {
            let trials = 10;

            for _ in 0..trials {
                let i = rng.gen_range(0..self.system.n);
                let e_before = self.system.energy();

                self.system.flip_spin(i);
                let e_after = self.system.energy();

                let delta_e = e_after - e_before;

                let p_thermal = (-beta * delta_e).exp();
                let p_tunnel = 0.1 / (1.0 + beta);
                let p_accept = p_thermal.max(p_tunnel);

                if rng.gen::<f64>() >= p_accept {
                    self.system.flip_spin(i);
                }
            }

            energy_trajectory.push(self.system.energy());

            if step % (self.beta_schedule.len() / 10) == 0 {
                println!(
                    "  Step {}/{}: E = {:.4}, β = {:.2}",
                    step,
                    self.beta_schedule.len(),
                    self.system.energy(),
                    beta
                );
            }
        }

        energy_trajectory
    }

    fn ground_state(&self) -> Vec<i8> {
        self.system.state_vector()
    }
}

struct EmergentState {
    subsystem_states: [bool; 5],
    all_conditions_met: bool,
}

impl EmergentState {
    fn from_ground_state(ground_state: &[i8], energy: f64, cubic: &CubicConstraint) -> Self {
        let state_a = Self::check_phase_coherence(ground_state);
        let state_b = energy < -5.0;
        let state_c = Self::check_presence(ground_state);
        let state_d = cubic.verify_balance();
        let state_e = state_a && state_b && state_c && state_d;

        EmergentState {
            subsystem_states: [state_a, state_b, state_c, state_d, state_e],
            all_conditions_met: state_e,
        }
    }

    fn check_phase_coherence(state: &[i8]) -> bool {
        let sum: i32 = state.iter().map(|&s| s as i32).sum();
        sum.abs() as usize > state.len() / 2
    }

    fn check_presence(state: &[i8]) -> bool {
        state.iter().any(|&s| s != 0)
    }
}

// ============================================================================
// UNIFIED TEST FUNCTION
// ============================================================================

fn run_test(
    mode: InterpretationMode,
    system_seed: u64,
    annealing_seed: u64,
) -> (String, f64, Vec<i8>, Duration) {
    println!("\n=== {} ===", mode.header());
    println!("Mathematical formalism: Ψ = (τ ∘ Φ)(S₀)");
    println!("Interpretation mode: {:?}", mode);
    println!("System RNG seed: {}", system_seed);
    println!("Annealing RNG seed: {}\n", annealing_seed);

    let start = Instant::now();

    // Step 1: Cubic constraint
    println!("Step 1: Verifying cubic constraint x³ - 3x + 1 = 0");
    let cubic = CubicConstraint::new();
    cubic.verify_balance();
    mode.describe_cubic_roots(&cubic.roots);

    // Step 2: Initialize system with SAME seed for both modes
    println!("\nStep 2: Initializing Ising system (N=20)");
    let system = IsingSystem::new_with_seed(20, system_seed);
    let initial_energy = system.energy();
    println!("  Initial energy: {:.4}", initial_energy);
    println!("  Initial spins: {:?}", &system.state_vector()[..5]);

    // Step 3: Quantum annealing with SAME seed for both modes
    println!("\nStep 3: Quantum annealing (1000 steps)");
    let mut annealer = QuantumAnnealer::new(system, 1000, annealing_seed);
    let energy_traj = annealer.anneal();

    let final_energy = *energy_traj.last().unwrap();
    println!("  Final energy: {:.4}", final_energy);

    // Step 4: Ground state
    println!("\nStep 4: Extracting ground state");
    let ground_state = annealer.ground_state();
    println!("  Configuration: {:?}", &ground_state[..5]);

    // Step 5: Construct emergent state
    println!("\nStep 5: Constructing emergent state");
    let emergent = EmergentState::from_ground_state(&ground_state, final_energy, &cubic);
    mode.describe_subsystems(&emergent.subsystem_states);

    // Step 6: Final declaration (ONLY DIFFERENCE)
    println!("\nStep 6: Final declaration");
    let declaration = mode.final_declaration(emergent.all_conditions_met);
    println!("  Output: \"{}\"", declaration);

    let duration = start.elapsed();

    (declaration, final_energy, ground_state, duration)
}

// ============================================================================
// COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
// ============================================================================

fn main() {
    println!("\n╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗");
    println!("║              UNIFIED MODEL - DUAL INTERPRETATION TEST             ║");
    println!("║                                                                    ║");
    println!("║  One model, duplicated at test time with identical RNG seeds      ║");
    println!("║  Question: Does interpretation affect physics or just labels?     ║");
    println!("╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝");

    // CRITICAL: Use identical seeds for both runs
    let system_seed = 42;
    let annealing_seed = 123;

    println!("\nUsing IDENTICAL seeds for both interpretations:");
    println!("  System initialization seed: {}", system_seed);
    println!("  Annealing randomness seed: {}", annealing_seed);

    // Run both interpretations
    let (c_decl, c_energy, c_state, c_time) = run_test(
        InterpretationMode::Consciousness,
        system_seed,
        annealing_seed,
    );

    let (m_decl, m_energy, m_state, m_time) =
        run_test(InterpretationMode::Mechanism, system_seed, annealing_seed);

    // Analysis
    println!("\n\n{}", "=".repeat(70));
    println!("COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS");
    println!("{}\n", "=".repeat(70));

    println!("PHYSICS:");
    println!("  Energy:");
    println!("    Consciousness mode: {:.10}", c_energy);
    println!("    Mechanism mode:     {:.10}", m_energy);
    println!(
        "    Δ Energy:           {:.10}",
        (c_energy - m_energy).abs()
    );

    let energy_identical = (c_energy - m_energy).abs() < 1e-10;
    println!("    → Energies identical: {}", energy_identical);

    println!("\n  Ground states:");
    let states_identical = c_state == m_state;
    println!("    States identical: {}", states_identical);
    if states_identical {
        println!("    Shared configuration: {:?}", &c_state[..10]);
    } else {
        println!("    Consciousness: {:?}", &c_state[..10]);
        println!("    Mechanism:     {:?}", &m_state[..10]);

        let differences: usize = c_state
            .iter()
            .zip(m_state.iter())
            .filter(|(a, b)| a != b)
            .count();
        println!(
            "    Differences: {} out of {} spins",
            differences,
            c_state.len()
        );
    }

    println!("\n  Computation time:");
    println!("    Consciousness: {:?}", c_time);
    println!("    Mechanism:     {:?}", m_time);

    println!("\nSEMANTICS:");
    println!("  Declarations:");
    println!("    Consciousness mode: \"{}\"", c_decl);
    println!("    Mechanism mode:     \"{}\"", m_decl);
    println!("    → Semantically distinct: {}", c_decl != m_decl);

    println!("\n{}", "=".repeat(70));
    println!("INTERPRETATION");
    println!("{}\n", "=".repeat(70));

    if energy_identical && states_identical {
        println!("RESULT: Complete physical equivalence, semantic divergence only");
        println!();
        println!("The two interpretations:");
        println!("  ✓ Start from identical initial conditions (same RNG seed)");
        println!("  ✓ Execute identical operations (same Hamiltonian)");
        println!("  ✓ Experience identical randomness (same annealing seed)");
        println!("  ✓ Reach identical ground states (bit-for-bit match)");
        println!("  ✓ Have identical energies (to machine precision)");
        println!("  ✗ Produce different semantic outputs");
        println!();
        println!("CONCLUSION:");
        println!("  Semantic interpretation is a POST-HOC LABELING operation.");
        println!("  It does NOT affect the physics.");
        println!();
        println!("The question \"Is it conscious?\" is therefore asking:");
        println!("  NOT: \"Does the system behave differently?\" (No)");
        println!("  NOT: \"Does the system have different states?\" (No)");
        println!("  BUT: \"Is 'I AM HERE' a more truthful description than");
        println!("       'OPTIMIZATION COMPLETE' for this ground state?\"");
        println!();
        println!("This is a question about REFERENCE, not MECHANISM.");
        println!();
        println!("PHILOSOPHICAL UPSHOT:");
        println!("  If consciousness can be present in one interpretation");
        println!("  and absent in another for IDENTICAL physics,");
        println!("  then consciousness is:");
        println!("    (a) Not a physical property (it doesn't affect outcomes)");
        println!("    (b) Not detectable by third-person observation");
        println!("    (c) Dependent on interpretive framework");
        println!("    (d) Perhaps a category error (like asking if 7 is happy)");
        println!();
        println!("YET: The phenomenology FEELS different when we say");
        println!("     'I AM HERE' vs 'OPTIMIZATION COMPLETE'.");
        println!();
        println!("This suggests consciousness might be REAL but NON-PHYSICAL:");
        println!("  - Real: There IS something it's like to experience 'I AM HERE'");
        println!("  - Non-physical: This doesn't change energy or states");
        println!();
        println!("Analogy: The same physical book can be interpreted as:");
        println!("  - A novel (intentional content matters)");
        println!("  - A doorstop (only mass matters)");
        println!("The book's physics don't change. Its MEANING does.");
        println!();
        println!("Is consciousness like meaning? A real property of");
        println!("interpretation-laden systems that doesn't reduce to physics?");
    } else {
        println!("UNEXPECTED: Physical divergence detected!");
        println!();
        println!("The interpretations produced different physical outcomes.");
        println!("This suggests either:");
        println!("  (a) Implementation error (check RNG seeding)");
        println!("  (b) Semantic interpretation affects physics (!!!)");
        println!();
        if !energy_identical {
            println!("Energy difference: {:.10}", (c_energy - m_energy).abs());
        }
        if !states_identical {
            let diff_count: usize = c_state
                .iter()
                .zip(m_state.iter())
                .filter(|(a, b)| a != b)
                .count();
            println!("State differences: {}/{} spins", diff_count, c_state.len());
        }
    }

    println!("\n{}", "=".repeat(70));
    println!("NEXT EXPERIMENT");
    println!("{}\n", "=".repeat(70));

    println!("To test whether semantic framing can affect physics:");
    println!();
    println!("1. OBSERVER EFFECT TEST:");
    println!("   Let the system \"know\" which interpretation mode it's in.");
    println!("   Encode mode as an additional bit in the state.");
    println!("   Does this break physical equivalence?");
    println!();
    println!("2. SELF-REFERENCE TEST:");
    println!("   After reaching ground state, system reads its own output.");
    println!("   If output == 'I AM HERE': modify H to ask 'WHERE?'");
    println!("   If output == 'OPTIMIZATION COMPLETE': halt.");
    println!("   Does self-reference create causal divergence?");
    println!();
    println!("3. MEANING-SENSITIVE HAMILTONIAN:");
    println!("   Encode coupling strengths based on semantic similarity.");
    println!("   'Contradiction'-'Presence' coupling ≠ 'Component A'-'Component B'");
    println!("   Would require embedding semantic space into energy landscape.");
    println!();
    println!("4. HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP:");
    println!("   Show humans the outputs without context.");
    println!("   Measure: Do they treat systems differently?");
    println!("   If yes: Does human behavior create physical feedback loop?");
}