cloudformation-validate-cel-engine 1.15.0

AWS CloudFormation Validate
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
use cel_engine::CelEngine;
use diagnostics::Diagnostic;
use rules::Severity;
use schema_validator::SchemaValidator;
use std::sync::LazyLock;
use validation_engine::{EngineConfig, ValidateConfig, validate_bytes};

static SV: LazyLock<SchemaValidator> = LazyLock::new(SchemaValidator::default);

fn validate(template: &str) -> Vec<Diagnostic> {
    let engine = CelEngine::new(EngineConfig::default()).unwrap();
    let report = validate_bytes(&engine, &SV, template.as_bytes(), ValidateConfig::default()).unwrap();
    report.diagnostics.into_iter().filter(|d| d.rule_id == "E3039").collect()
}

#[test]
fn table_only_missing_definition() {
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 1, "Expected 1 finding, got: {:?}", findings);
    let d = &findings[0];
    assert_eq!(d.rule_id, "E3039");
    assert_eq!(d.severity, Severity::Error);
    assert_eq!(d.property_path.as_deref(), Some("Properties"));
    assert_eq!(d.entity.as_ref().unwrap().logical_id, "MyTable");
    assert_eq!(d.message, "AttributeDefinitions does not match KeySchema attributes. missing definitions: [sk]");
}

#[test]
fn gsi_missing_definition() {
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: sk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes:
        - IndexName: gsi1
          KeySchema:
            - AttributeName: gsi_pk
              KeyType: HASH
          Projection:
            ProjectionType: ALL
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 1, "Expected 1 finding, got: {:?}", findings);
    let d = &findings[0];
    assert_eq!(d.rule_id, "E3039");
    assert_eq!(d.severity, Severity::Error);
    assert_eq!(d.property_path.as_deref(), Some("Properties"));
    assert_eq!(d.entity.as_ref().unwrap().logical_id, "MyTable");
    assert!(d.message.contains("missing definitions: [gsi_pk]"), "Expected missing gsi_pk, got: {}", d.message);
}

#[test]
fn lsi_missing_definition() {
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: sk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
      LocalSecondaryIndexes:
        - IndexName: lsi1
          KeySchema:
            - AttributeName: pk
              KeyType: HASH
            - AttributeName: lsi_sk
              KeyType: RANGE
          Projection:
            ProjectionType: ALL
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 1, "Expected 1 finding, got: {:?}", findings);
    let d = &findings[0];
    assert_eq!(d.rule_id, "E3039");
    assert_eq!(d.severity, Severity::Error);
    assert_eq!(d.property_path.as_deref(), Some("Properties"));
    assert_eq!(d.entity.as_ref().unwrap().logical_id, "MyTable");
    assert!(d.message.contains("missing definitions: [lsi_sk]"), "Expected missing lsi_sk, got: {}", d.message);
}

#[test]
fn unused_definition() {
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: sk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: extra
          AttributeType: N
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 1, "Expected 1 finding, got: {:?}", findings);
    let d = &findings[0];
    assert_eq!(d.rule_id, "E3039");
    assert_eq!(d.severity, Severity::Error);
    assert_eq!(d.property_path.as_deref(), Some("Properties"));
    assert_eq!(d.entity.as_ref().unwrap().logical_id, "MyTable");
    assert_eq!(d.message, "AttributeDefinitions does not match KeySchema attributes. unused definitions: [extra]");
}

#[test]
fn combined_missing_and_unused() {
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: extra
          AttributeType: N
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 1, "Expected 1 finding, got: {:?}", findings);
    let d = &findings[0];
    assert_eq!(d.rule_id, "E3039");
    assert_eq!(d.severity, Severity::Error);
    assert_eq!(d.property_path.as_deref(), Some("Properties"));
    assert_eq!(d.entity.as_ref().unwrap().logical_id, "MyTable");
    assert_eq!(
        d.message,
        "AttributeDefinitions does not match KeySchema attributes. missing definitions: [sk]; unused definitions: [extra]"
    );
}

#[test]
fn duplicate_references_set_semantics() {
    // The same attribute referenced in both table KeySchema and GSI KeySchema
    // should not cause duplication issues -- set semantics deduplicate.
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: sk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes:
        - IndexName: gsi1
          KeySchema:
            - AttributeName: sk
              KeyType: HASH
            - AttributeName: pk
              KeyType: RANGE
          Projection:
            ProjectionType: ALL
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 0, "Expected no findings, got: {:?}", findings);
}

#[test]
fn fully_valid_table_gsi_lsi() {
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: sk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: gsi_pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: lsi_sk
          AttributeType: N
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes:
        - IndexName: gsi1
          KeySchema:
            - AttributeName: gsi_pk
              KeyType: HASH
            - AttributeName: sk
              KeyType: RANGE
          Projection:
            ProjectionType: ALL
      LocalSecondaryIndexes:
        - IndexName: lsi1
          KeySchema:
            - AttributeName: pk
              KeyType: HASH
            - AttributeName: lsi_sk
              KeyType: RANGE
          Projection:
            ProjectionType: ALL
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 0, "Expected no findings, got: {:?}", findings);
}

#[test]
fn dynamic_gsi_authored_but_unresolvable_no_finding() {
    // GSI property is authored via a Ref (dynamic value that cannot resolve to
    // an array). The rule should skip this table conservatively rather than
    // treating the index as absent and reporting false positives.
    // gsi_pk is defined but only referenced by the unresolvable GSI -- without
    // the conservative guard, this would falsely emit an unused-definition finding.
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Parameters:
  GSIs:
    Type: String
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: gsi_pk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes: !Ref GSIs
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 0, "Dynamic GSI should suppress finding, got: {:?}", findings);
}

#[test]
fn malformed_index_key_schema_no_finding() {
    // A GSI item is present but its KeySchema cannot resolve to the expected
    // array shape (it is a Ref). The rule should bail conservatively.
    // gsi_pk is defined but only referenced by the unresolvable index KeySchema
    // -- without the conservative guard, this would falsely emit an
    // unused-definition finding.
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Parameters:
  KeySchemaParam:
    Type: String
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: gsi_pk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes:
        - IndexName: gsi1
          KeySchema: !Ref KeySchemaParam
          Projection:
            ProjectionType: ALL
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 0, "Malformed index KeySchema should suppress finding, got: {:?}", findings);
}

#[test]
fn conditional_gsi_reports_each_reachable_mismatch() {
    // The table KeySchema always references the undefined 'sk'. When the GSI
    // exists, that is the only mismatch. When the GSI is absent, its 'gsi_pk'
    // definition is also unused, so both distinct reachable mismatches must be
    // reported.
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Parameters:
  AddGSI:
    Type: String
Conditions:
  CreateGSI: !Equals [!Ref AddGSI, "true"]
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: gsi_pk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes: !If
        - CreateGSI
        - - IndexName: gsi1
            KeySchema:
              - AttributeName: gsi_pk
                KeyType: HASH
            Projection:
              ProjectionType: ALL
        - !Ref AWS::NoValue
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    let mut messages: Vec<_> = findings.iter().map(|diagnostic| diagnostic.message.as_str()).collect();
    messages.sort_unstable();
    assert_eq!(
        messages,
        [
            "AttributeDefinitions does not match KeySchema attributes. missing definitions: [sk]",
            "AttributeDefinitions does not match KeySchema attributes. missing definitions: [sk]; unused definitions: [gsi_pk]",
        ],
        "both reachable index-presence worlds must be diagnosed"
    );
}

#[test]
fn conditional_gsi_absence_reports_unused_definition() {
    // All attributes are used while the GSI exists. In the reachable world
    // where AWS::NoValue removes the GSI, gsi_pk is an unused definition.
    let template = r#"
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Parameters:
  AddGSI:
    Type: String
Conditions:
  CreateGSI: !Equals [!Ref AddGSI, "true"]
Resources:
  MyTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      TableName: test
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: gsi_pk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
      GlobalSecondaryIndexes: !If
        - CreateGSI
        - - IndexName: gsi1
            KeySchema:
              - AttributeName: gsi_pk
                KeyType: HASH
            Projection:
              ProjectionType: ALL
        - !Ref AWS::NoValue
"#;
    let findings = validate(template);
    assert_eq!(findings.len(), 1, "expected the index-absent mismatch: {findings:?}");
    assert_eq!(
        findings[0].message,
        "AttributeDefinitions does not match KeySchema attributes. unused definitions: [gsi_pk]"
    );
}