cargo-mend 0.18.0

Opinionated visibility auditing for Rust crates and workspaces
cargo-mend-0.18.0 is not a library.

cargo-mend

Crates.io MIT/Apache 2.0 Crates.io CI

Warning: This project is pre-1.0 and under active development. Diagnostics, config, and CLI flags may change between releases. Fix modes modify source files in place; Mend-managed fixes roll back on cargo check failure, but always review the diff before committing.

cargo-mend provides the cargo mend subcommand for enforcing an opinionated Rust visibility style across a crate or workspace.

The tool is meant for codebases that want visibility to describe real module boundaries.

Guiding Principle

The goal is that you should be able to read a Rust file in place and understand what each item's visibility is trying to say.

In practice, that means:

  • if you see pub in a leaf module, it should suggest that the item is part of that module's intended API surface
  • if an item is only meant for its parent module or peer modules under the same parent, pub(super) should say that directly
  • if an item in a top-level private module is shared across crate-root branches, use pub(crate); if it stays inside its own subtree, narrow it further
  • if the crate root re-exports the item via pub use, the source must be bare pub (E0364)
  • if an item is only local implementation detail, keep it private
  • if an item seems to need a deeply nested visibility like pub(in crate::feature::subtree) and that path is not the narrowest boundary required by callers, signatures, or a parent facade, the module tree is probably wrong; cargo mend rejects the form so the structural problem remains visible

cargo mend flags places where the written visibility is broader, vaguer, or more global than the code relationship actually is.

Mend Policy

Hard errors:

  • pub(in ...) is forbidden unless a crate-rooted path exactly matches the boundary required by a parent facade, callers, or signature reach and pub_in_path permits it
  • pub mod requires an explicit allowlist entry, except for a crate-root prelude

Warnings:

  • pub(crate) when the complete reach analysis proves that a narrower visibility is sufficient; it is accepted when the narrowest proven boundary is the crate root
  • pub that exceeds the reach required by callers or signatures
  • dead field visibility and parent facades that deserve review
  • import forms that obscure local module relationships
  • parent-module pub use * re-exports that should be explicit

If you are new to Rust visibility, the important idea is this:

  • pub does not automatically make an item part of the crate's real outward API
  • every parent module on the path also has to be visible
  • if a parent module is private, a child item can be written as pub and still not actually be reachable from outside the crate

Config

The tool looks for mend.toml at the target root.

[visibility]
allow_pub_mod = [
  "mcp/src/brp_tools/tools/mod.rs",
]
allow_pub_items = [
  "src/example/private_child.rs::SomeIntentionalFacadeItem",
]
# exact caller, signature, or facade boundaries: forbidden | permitted | required
pub_in_path = "required"

Use the allowlists sparingly. The default assumption should be that the code structure is wrong before the policy is wrong.

pub_in_path controls exact crate-rooted pub(in crate::path) boundaries on declarations and fields:

  • forbidden rejects them
  • permitted accepts them when they exactly match a caller, signature, or parent-facade boundary
  • required (the default) also asks suspicious_pub to recommend that boundary instead of bare pub, and cargo mend --fix rewrites the declaration or field

Other restricted spellings, such as pub(in crate), relative pub(in super::...) paths, and boundaries that do not match the proven reach remain diagnostics.

A crate-root pub mod prelude; is exempt from review_pub_mod by default — a prelude is an intentional public surface, so it does not need an allow_pub_mod entry. Nested pub mod prelude; and any other crate-root pub mod are still reviewed. Set allow_prelude_pub_mod = false under [visibility] to review crate-root preludes too.

Global config

On first run, cargo-mend writes a global config to your platform config directory:

  • Linux: $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/cargo-mend/config.toml, falling back to ~/.config/cargo-mend/config.toml
  • macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/cargo-mend/config.toml

It records the on/off default for every diagnostic and the fallback defaults for [visibility]:

[diagnostics]
review_pub_mod = true
# ... one line per diagnostic

[visibility]
# default-on; set false to review crate-root prelude modules too
allow_prelude_pub_mod = true
# required (default) reviews pub; permitted also accepts it; forbidden rejects pub(in ...)
pub_in_path = "required"

For allow_prelude_pub_mod and pub_in_path, a project mend.toml value overrides the global value, and the global value overrides the compiled-in default. The allow_pub_mod and allow_pub_items path lists are project-only. [diagnostics] entries use project-over-global precedence. On every run, cargo-mend adds any keys missing from an existing global config (preserving your comments and values), so the file stays complete as new options are introduced.

Installation

cargo-mend uses #![feature(rustc_private)] to access compiler internals for visibility analysis after macro expansion. This is a permanently unstable feature — it is how tools like clippy and miri access the compiler, but it means the compiler's internal crates have no stability guarantee and cargo-mend is sensitive to the exact rustc version used to build it.

Compatibility

cargo-mend links against the compiler internals of the toolchain that builds it, so releases are tied to a specific rustc version. Build and run each release with its matching toolchain:

cargo-mend rustc
0.17+ 1.97
0.16.x 1.96

Install the rustc-dev component, then install cargo-mend with the stable toolchain plus RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1. Nightly-built binaries can fail against stable projects with E0514 because cargo-mend links against rustc_driver.

rustup component add rustc-dev
RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 cargo +stable install --path .
RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 cargo +stable install cargo-mend --version <VERSION>

Usage

cargo mend
cargo mend --fail-on-warn
cargo mend --dry-run
cargo mend --fix
cargo mend --fix-pub-use
cargo mend --fix-compiler
cargo mend --fix-all
cargo mend --json
cargo mend --workspace
cargo mend --package my-crate
cargo mend --manifest-path path/to/Cargo.toml
cargo mend path/to/project

Behavior:

  • run it at a workspace root to audit all workspace members
  • run it in a member crate directory to audit just that package
  • pass --manifest-path to choose an explicit crate or workspace root
  • --fix applies Mend's proven import and visibility rewrites
  • --fix-pub-use repairs stale parent re-exports, while --fix-compiler runs cargo fix
  • --fix-all combines all three fix categories
  • --dry-run previews the requested categories; by itself, it previews all fixes
  • warnings leave the exit status successful unless --fail-on-warn is set
  • if a Mend fix batch would leave the crate failing cargo check, cargo-mend restores the original files automatically
  • if there is nothing fixable, cargo-mend says so after the report summary

Target selection flags are display filters

--lib, --bin <NAME>, --example <NAME>, --test <NAME>, --bench <NAME>, and --all-targets only narrow what gets printed. They do not change what gets analyzed — mend always compiles every target (lib, bins, tests, examples, benches).

Why: whether a pub fn is "really used" depends on the whole crate. If you analyze only the lib, a function called solely by an integration test or a #[cfg(test)] helper looks dead and mend would suggest narrowing or removing it. That suggestion would break the test build. By always compiling everything, mend sees the full call graph and gives correct answers.

So cargo mend --lib is "show me only the lib-file findings"; the analysis behind those findings still considered every target.

Caveat: this covers #[cfg(test)], but not code enabled only by non-default features. Cargo-mend does not currently expose Cargo's feature-selection flags, so those configurations are outside the analyzed call graph.

Intended workflow

Use this as a migration aid and CI guard:

  1. report visibility forms broader than the proven boundary
  2. review suspicious pub
  3. let cargo mend --fix apply the visibility and import rewrites it can prove safe
  4. keep repo-specific exceptions small and explicit

The usual review flow is:

  1. ask whether the item is truly part of the module's API
  2. if all callers are inside the defining module subtree, make it private
  3. if callers live in sibling modules, try pub(super) in a nested module
  4. use pub(in crate::path) when callers, signatures, or a parent facade require a wider ancestor
  5. use pub(crate) when the required common ancestor is the crate root
  6. move the item to a better common parent when a restricted annotation would obscure ownership
  7. only keep broader visibility when the module structure genuinely requires it

Diagnostic Reference

Overly broad pub(crate)

pub(crate) lets any module in the crate touch the item, regardless of where the item lives. In a deep module tree that usually weakens the module boundaries the layout was meant to enforce.

This rule applies to declarations and struct and union fields. Cargo-mend joins callers and signature requirements across every selected target and computes their deepest common module. It accepts pub(crate) when that module is the crate root. When the common module is narrower, the overbroad_pub_crate diagnostic reports that the annotation is broader than required.

Otherwise, prefer:

  • private items when they are local implementation details
  • pub(super) when the parent module owns the boundary
  • pub(in crate::path) when callers, signatures, or a parent facade require a wider ancestor
  • pub(crate) when uses genuinely span crate-root sibling branches
  • moving the item to a better common parent when pub(super) is too narrow

cargo mend --fix writes each proven result directly: it removes an unnecessary annotation, uses pub(super) for the immediate parent, uses exact pub(in crate::path) for a wider ancestor, and uses pub(crate) for the crate root. It applies related declaration changes in one batch before the validation build, so a trait and its associated type can narrow together without an intermediate E0446 failure. Field construction, access, destructuring, and offset_of! computations contribute caller evidence for named and positional fields.

When mend gives facade-specific advice, it quotes the facade's use spelling only when it can establish that spelling from the active item graph. A resolved reach alone never licenses quoting a modifier; otherwise the diagnostic calls it a re-export without naming a modifier.

In this example, feature is a parent module and helpers.rs exists only to support it. The question is whether the helper should be available to the whole crate, or just to feature.

// src/feature/mod.rs
mod helpers;

// src/feature/helpers.rs
pub(crate) fn helper() {}

When every caller is under feature, the crate-wide annotation ignores that module boundary. A better version is:

// src/feature/helpers.rs
pub(super) fn helper() {}

helper is now available to feature and nowhere else.

pub(crate) remains correct when the item is reached from crate-root sibling branches:

// src/lib.rs
mod render;
mod text;

// src/render/batching.rs
pub(crate) struct TextRunBatch;

If both render and text reach TextRunBatch, their common boundary is the crate root and mend accepts the annotation.

Forbidden pub(in ...)

Arbitrary pub(in ...) annotations are rejected because they can hide an ownership problem behind a long path. An exact crate-rooted pub(in crate::path) is accepted when path is the narrowest boundary required by callers, signatures, or a parent facade. Set pub_in_path = "permitted" (the less strict mode) or "required" (the default) to accept that exact boundary.

A parent re-export is one case that requires this form. A pub(super) use can put the item's required reach above the module where it is declared: pub(super) at the declaration is then too narrow to compile, while bare pub is wider than required.

// src/video_plane/plane/camera_panel.rs
pub(in crate::video_plane) fn bind_camera_panel() {}

// src/video_plane/plane/mod.rs
mod camera_panel;
pub(super) use camera_panel::bind_camera_panel;

Here the item lives in video_plane::plane::camera_panel, while the facade lives in video_plane::plane. The facade's pub(super) use must be visible to video_plane, but pub(super) on bind_camera_panel would only make it visible to plane; rustc rejects that wider re-export with E0364. Bare pub compiles, but says more than the relationship requires. pub(in crate::video_plane) states the required reach exactly.

The path is the parent of the module holding the facade, not one level above the item. In this example it is two levels above camera_panel. With chained facades, find the widest facade and use the parent of the module holding it; the distance can grow beyond two levels. The path names who can see the item, not who owns it.

Always spell this boundary from crate::. pub(in super::super) can name the same module, but forces readers to count levels and changes meaning when the file moves.

Exact-boundary repairs apply to declarations and fields. A use line selects its own reach, so pub(super), pub(crate), and pub already express what it needs.

Do not use this form to avoid moving an item. If the required path is long or names a module unrelated to the item, the item belongs in a different module. It is not a way to widen access: pub(in crate::a) is narrower than pub(crate) and pub. If it seems necessary to unlock access, consider whether the intended decision is a pub(crate) use facade instead, and state that decision on the use line.

Review pub mod

pub mod is disallowed by default — it publishes the module path as part of the crate's public API. Override per path via allow_pub_mod in mend.toml when the public path is intentional (e.g. macro or codegen constraints).

// src/lib.rs
pub mod tools;   // module path is now part of the crate's public API

Suspicious pub

A nested private module can declare pub struct Helper;, but if any parent module on the path is private, Helper cannot escape the crate — the bare pub is broader than the boundary the file actually participates in.

// src/lib.rs
mod support;

// src/support/mod.rs
mod helpers;

// src/support/helpers.rs
pub struct Helper;

Helper is pub, but support is private, so Helper is unreachable from outside the crate. The declared visibility doesn't match the actual reach.

Resolutions:

  • make the item private
  • change it to pub(super)
  • use the exact pub(in crate::path) or pub(crate) boundary Mend reports when wider access is required
  • move it to a better common parent if it is genuinely shared across the crate

At logical depth greater than one, suspicious_pub examines bare pub and accepted crate-rooted pub(in crate::...) declarations. Its parent-facade-boundary suggestion for a bare pub appears only when pub_in_path = "required"; accepted pub(in ...) declarations are also reviewed for a boundary that has become stale or no longer matches the facade.

This warning does not fire at a top-level private module — Narrow pub to pub(crate) covers that case. At the top level, bare pub is only correct when the crate root re-exports the item via pub use; otherwise, narrow it to pub(crate).

Parent-facade exception

When the parent module re-exports the child item, the child pub is intentional and the warning is suppressed:

// src/private_parent/mod.rs
mod child;
pub use child::Helper;

The exception applies whether the parent boundary is a mod.rs file or an ordinary file module like markdown_file.rs. If nothing outside the parent subtree uses that re-export, the warning still fires — and the compiler usually emits a paired unused import warning on the parent. cargo mend --fix-pub-use is designed to repair that paired case.

Unused pub

When a pub item is only used inside its defining module subtree, the modifier grants no useful access. Private visibility already lets the defining module and its descendants call the item.

// src/lib.rs
mod renderer;

// src/renderer/mod.rs
mod tests;

pub fn normalize_label(label: &str) -> String {
    label.trim().to_string()
}

// src/renderer/tests.rs
fn example() {
    let _ = super::normalize_label(" title ");
}

The item does not need to be visible to the parent or sibling modules:

fn normalize_label(label: &str) -> String {
    label.trim().to_string()
}

This warning does not fire for pub items in a library crate root, for items reached from outside their defining module subtree, or for items structurally exposed through public signatures.

cargo mend --fix can remove these pub annotations automatically.

Prefer module import

This warning detects direct function imports and suggests importing the parent module instead, then calling the function with module qualification.

Example:

// Before:
use crate::error::report_to_mcp_error;

fn example() {
    let error = report_to_mcp_error(&err);
}

// After:
use crate::error;

fn example() {
    let error = error::report_to_mcp_error(&err);
}

cargo mend --fix can rewrite these cases automatically. It rewrites the use statement and qualifies all bare references in the file.

Inline path-qualified type

This warning detects types used with inline path qualification — both intra-crate (crate::module::MyType, super::module::MyType) and external-crate (ratatui::Frame, std::collections::BTreeMap, notify::WatcherKind::Variant) — and suggests adding a use import at the top of the file instead. Trait paths in impl Trait for Type are also covered.

Example:

// Before:
fn example() -> crate::module::MyType {
    crate::module::MyType::new()
}

fn render(frame: &mut ratatui::Frame<'_>) {}

impl crate::pane::Hittable for ToastManager { /* ... */ }

// After:
use crate::module::MyType;
use crate::pane::Hittable;
use ratatui::Frame;

fn example() -> MyType {
    MyType::new()
}

fn render(frame: &mut Frame<'_>) {}

impl Hittable for ToastManager { /* ... */ }

cargo mend --fix can rewrite these cases automatically. It adds the use import and replaces all inline occurrences with the bare type name. The fix is skipped when adding the import would shadow a name the file already uses (e.g. it won't add use io::Result; if the file relies on the prelude Result via Result::ok).

Shorten local crate import

A crate::a::b::c::* import that crosses no module boundary makes the path look more global than the relationship is. When the importer and the imported module share a parent, prefer the local-relative form.

// src/app_tools/support/process.rs

// flagged — `cargo_detector` is a peer of `process` under `support`
use crate::app_tools::support::cargo_detector::TargetType;

// preferred
use super::cargo_detector::TargetType;

cargo mend --fix rewrites these cases automatically. It preserves the original use visibility (use, pub use, pub(crate) use, etc.) and rolls the edits back if the follow-up cargo check fails.

Replace deep super:: import

super::super:: and deeper chains force the reader to count hops to figure out where the import lands. When a single super:: is not enough, a named crate:: path is immediately clear.

Example:

// src/tui/columns/render.rs

// flagged — deep super chain
use super::super::ResolvedWidths;

// preferred — named crate path
use crate::tui::ResolvedWidths;

This applies at any depth: super::super::super:: and beyond are all rewritten to the equivalent crate:: path.

cargo mend --fix can rewrite these cases automatically.

Wildcard parent pub use

This warning is about parent facade modules that re-export everything from a child with *.

That makes the boundary harder to read because the parent module no longer says what it is actually exporting.

Prefer:

pub use child::{Helper, OtherHelper};

instead of:

pub use child::*;

Internal parent pub use facade

This warning is about a parent boundary module that is being used as an internal namespace facade inside its own subtree.

In other words:

  • the parent pub use is not part of the outward boundary
  • but code inside the subtree is still referring to the parent path directly
  • that makes the parent boundary part of the implementation structure, not just the facade

Example:

// src/private_parent/mod.rs
mod child;
pub use child::Helper;

// src/private_parent/sibling.rs
fn use_helper() {
    let _ = std::mem::size_of::<super::Helper>();
}

In this example, super::Helper is using the parent boundary itself as an internal facade.

That can be intentional, but it is worth review because it usually means one of two things:

  • the parent boundary is acting as an internal namespace and should stay that way intentionally
  • or the subtree should import the child module directly instead of routing through the parent

Cargo-mend does not auto-fix this case because removing the facade also requires choosing which child-module path each caller should import.

Narrow pub to pub(crate)

This warning flags bare pub items that can't actually escape the crate. Writing pub(crate) at the definition makes the real reach visible at a glance, instead of forcing the reader to walk up the module tree.

It fires in two situations:

The crate root doesn't re-export the item.

// src/lib.rs
mod helpers;
pub use helpers::exported_fn;

// src/helpers.rs
pub fn exported_fn() {}    // re-exported → must stay `pub`
pub fn internal_fn() {}    // NOT re-exported → should be `pub(crate)`

The parent re-exports the item as pub(crate) use. The pub(crate) use already caps reach at the crate boundary, so the source modifier should match.

// src/keyboard/mod.rs
mod keys;
pub(crate) use keys::send_keys_handler;

// src/keyboard/keys.rs
pub fn send_keys_handler() {}   // → should be `pub(crate)`

Glob re-exports (pub(crate) use foo::*) are ignored — they neither trigger nor block this lint. Items widened by a pub use somewhere in the chain are left alone.

Run cargo mend --fix to auto-fix these items to pub(crate).

Field visibility wider than type

This warning flags struct, union, or enum-variant fields with a pub or pub(crate) annotation on a fully private type (a type with no pub annotation of its own). The field annotation cannot grant any access because the containing type itself isn't visible — the annotation is dead.

The lint deliberately does not fire on pub fields of pub(crate) or pub(super) structs:

// Allowed — `pub` on fields of a `pub(crate)` struct is idiomatic Rust shorthand
pub(crate) struct GhRun {
    pub id:        u64,
    pub node_id:   String,
}

What does get flagged: a pub field on a struct that has no visibility annotation at all.

// inside a private module
struct Hidden {
    pub leaked: u32,   // dead — Hidden is private, `pub` grants nothing
}

After cargo mend --fix:

struct Hidden {
    leaked: u32,
}

Run cargo mend --fix to auto-remove dead field annotations.

Imports at top of file

This warning flags use statements written inside function bodies, closures, and other block expressions. They should live at the top of the enclosing file or the enclosing inline mod { ... } block instead.

// before
fn example() {
    use crate::movable::Movable;
    let m = Movable::default();
}
// after
use crate::movable::Movable;

fn example() {
    let m = Movable::default();
}

cargo mend --fix lifts the use to the top of the enclosing file or inline module. The fix is conservative:

  • use statements with any attribute (most importantly #[cfg(...)]) are left in place because lifting them could change what's in scope under a different configuration.
  • Glob imports (use foo::*;) inside a body are left in place; they may shadow arbitrary names at the destination.
  • When the bare name the in-body use introduces is already bound at the top of the destination — by another use with a different full path, or by a struct/enum/fn/etc. defined at that level — the in-body use is left in place to avoid an E0255 collision.
  • When the bare name and full path already match an existing top-level use, the in-body duplicate is deleted.

Run cargo mend --fix to auto-lift use statements.

License

Licensed under either of

at your option.