btctax-core 0.3.0

Offline US Bitcoin tax engine — per-lot cost basis, realized gains, and IRS-form projection (part of btctax).
Documentation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
//! P2-B Task 2 + Task 3 KATs — Form 8949 rows (`form_8949`) + Schedule D part totals (`schedule_d`).
//!
//! Both builders are pure, year-scoped projections over `state.disposals`. These KATs drive them
//! with DIRECT-STATE `DisposalLeg`/`Disposal` fixtures (mirroring `tax_compute.rs`) so ST/LT term,
//! gift zone, wallet, acquired/sold dates, multi-leg disposals, and multi-year scenarios are all
//! under exact control — a real projection cannot place an LT disposition and an ST disposition in
//! the same tax year without the §7.4 transition seed, which is orthogonal to the output projection
//! under test. PRIVACY: synthetic values only; no real user file is read (NFR).
use btctax_core::conventions::{TaxDate, Usd};
use btctax_core::event::{BasisSource, DisposeKind};
use btctax_core::forms::{
    form_8283, form_8949, schedule_d, Form8283HowAcquired, Form8283Section, Form8949Box,
    Form8949Part,
};
use btctax_core::identity::{EventId, LotId, WalletId};
use btctax_core::state::{
    Disposal, DisposalLeg, GiftZone, LedgerState, Removal, RemovalKind, RemovalLeg, Term,
};
use btctax_core::DonationDetails;
use rust_decimal_macros::dec;
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use time::macros::date;

// ── direct-state builders ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
fn exch() -> WalletId {
    WalletId::Exchange {
        provider: "cb".into(),
        account: "m".into(),
    }
}
fn cold() -> WalletId {
    WalletId::SelfCustody {
        label: "cold".into(),
    }
}
fn lot(origin_seq: u64, split: u32) -> LotId {
    LotId {
        origin_event_id: EventId::decision(origin_seq),
        split_sequence: split,
    }
}
/// A baseline ST exchange leg (100 sat, all-zero money, acquired 2025-01-01). Tests override fields
/// via struct-update syntax, e.g. `DisposalLeg { term: Term::LongTerm, ..base_leg() }`.
fn base_leg() -> DisposalLeg {
    DisposalLeg {
        lot_id: lot(0, 0),
        sat: 100,
        proceeds: dec!(0),
        basis: dec!(0),
        gain: dec!(0),
        term: Term::ShortTerm,
        basis_source: BasisSource::ComputedFromCost,
        gift_zone: None,
        acquired_at: date!(2025 - 01 - 01),
        wallet: exch(),
        pseudo: false,
    }
}
fn disposal(seq: u64, disposed_at: TaxDate, kind: DisposeKind, legs: Vec<DisposalLeg>) -> Disposal {
    Disposal {
        event: EventId::decision(seq),
        kind,
        disposed_at,
        legs,
        fee_mini_disposition: false,
    }
}
fn state(disposals: Vec<Disposal>) -> LedgerState {
    LedgerState {
        disposals,
        ..Default::default()
    }
}

// ── Task 2 — Form 8949 rows ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

/// ST leg → Part I / box C; LT leg → Part II / box F.
#[test]
fn st_leg_is_part_i_box_c_and_lt_leg_is_part_ii_box_f() {
    let st = state(vec![
        disposal(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                term: Term::ShortTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
        disposal(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 04 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                term: Term::LongTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    let st_row = rows
        .iter()
        .find(|r| r.part == Form8949Part::ShortTerm)
        .unwrap();
    let lt_row = rows
        .iter()
        .find(|r| r.part == Form8949Part::LongTerm)
        .unwrap();
    assert_eq!(st_row.box_, Form8949Box::C);
    assert_eq!(lt_row.box_, Form8949Box::F);
}

/// Column (a) description is the EXACT BTC amount, 8dp + " BTC" — "0.53000000 BTC" (never a float).
#[test]
fn description_is_exact_btc_amount_8dp() {
    let st = state(vec![disposal(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
        DisposeKind::Sell,
        vec![DisposalLeg {
            sat: 53_000_000,
            ..base_leg()
        }],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].description, "0.53000000 BTC");
}

/// Dates / proceeds / basis / gain on the row match the leg (and the disposal's disposed_at).
#[test]
fn row_fields_match_the_leg() {
    let st = state(vec![disposal(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 09 - 15),
        DisposeKind::Spend,
        vec![DisposalLeg {
            proceeds: dec!(100.50),
            basis: dec!(60.00),
            gain: dec!(40.50),
            acquired_at: date!(2024 - 02 - 20),
            term: Term::LongTerm,
            ..base_leg()
        }],
    )]);
    let r = &form_8949(&st, 2025)[0];
    assert_eq!(r.date_acquired, date!(2024 - 02 - 20));
    assert_eq!(r.date_sold, date!(2025 - 09 - 15));
    assert_eq!(r.proceeds, dec!(100.50));
    assert_eq!(r.cost_basis, dec!(60.00));
    assert_eq!(r.gain, dec!(40.50));
    assert_eq!(r.disposition_kind, DisposeKind::Spend);
    // adjustment columns are always blank / zero (no §1091, no other adjustments).
    assert_eq!(r.adjustment_code, "");
    assert_eq!(r.adjustment_amount, Usd::ZERO);
}

/// A multi-leg disposal spanning ST + LT → two rows in the correct parts. Also proves within-disposal
/// ordering is by `lot_id` (NOT by term): the legs are pushed ST-then-LT but the LT leg has the
/// lower lot split, so it must come out first.
#[test]
fn multi_leg_disposal_spanning_st_and_lt_yields_two_rows_ordered_by_lot() {
    let st = state(vec![disposal(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 05 - 01),
        DisposeKind::Sell,
        vec![
            // pushed first, but higher lot split (0,1) → must sort AFTER the LT leg below.
            DisposalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                term: Term::ShortTerm,
                gain: dec!(5),
                ..base_leg()
            },
            // pushed second, lower lot split (0,0) → must sort FIRST.
            DisposalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 0),
                term: Term::LongTerm,
                gain: dec!(9),
                ..base_leg()
            },
        ],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    // lot (0,0) < (0,1) → LT leg first, ST leg second (ordering is by lot_id, not term).
    assert_eq!(rows[0].part, Form8949Part::LongTerm);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].gain, dec!(9));
    assert_eq!(rows[1].part, Form8949Part::ShortTerm);
    assert_eq!(rows[1].gain, dec!(5));
}

/// A NoGainNoLoss dual-basis gift-zone leg → row present, gain 0, adjustment columns blank. The fold
/// set basis == proceeds for that zone, so the row is internally consistent with no special code.
#[test]
fn no_gain_no_loss_gift_leg_row_present_with_zero_gain_and_blank_adjustments() {
    let st = state(vec![disposal(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 08 - 01),
        DisposeKind::Sell,
        vec![DisposalLeg {
            proceeds: dec!(80.00),
            basis: dec!(80.00), // NGNL: basis == proceeds → gain 0
            gain: dec!(0),
            gift_zone: Some(GiftZone::NoGainNoLoss),
            ..base_leg()
        }],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1, "the NGNL disposition IS a reported row");
    assert_eq!(rows[0].gain, Usd::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].proceeds, rows[0].cost_basis);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].adjustment_code, "");
    assert_eq!(rows[0].adjustment_amount, Usd::ZERO);
}

/// Year filter: a prior-year (and a future-year) disposal is excluded from the year's rows.
#[test]
fn year_filter_excludes_out_of_year_disposals() {
    let st = state(vec![
        disposal(
            1,
            date!(2024 - 12 - 31),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![base_leg()],
        ),
        disposal(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![base_leg()],
        ),
        disposal(
            3,
            date!(2026 - 01 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![base_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].date_sold, date!(2025 - 06 - 01));
}

/// Deterministic ordering: rows are sorted by (disposed_at, event id, lot_id), regardless of the
/// disposal push order. Two disposals share a date → tie broken by event id.
#[test]
fn deterministic_ordering_by_date_then_event_then_lot() {
    // Pushed scrambled: 06-01(dec2), 03-01(dec1), 03-01(dec3). Distinct sat → identify each row.
    let st = state(vec![
        disposal(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                sat: 300_000_000, // "3.00000000 BTC"
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
        disposal(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                sat: 100_000_000, // "1.00000000 BTC"
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
        disposal(
            3,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                sat: 200_000_000, // "2.00000000 BTC"
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    let order: Vec<&str> = rows.iter().map(|r| r.description.as_str()).collect();
    // 03-01/dec1 (1 BTC), then 03-01/dec3 (2 BTC), then 06-01/dec2 (3 BTC).
    assert_eq!(
        order,
        vec!["1.00000000 BTC", "2.00000000 BTC", "3.00000000 BTC"]
    );
}

/// Box needs review: an EXCHANGE-wallet disposition → `box_needs_review == true` (may carry a
/// 1099-B/1099-DA); a self-custody disposition → `false`. Box stays the C/F default in both cases.
#[test]
fn exchange_wallet_flags_box_needs_review_self_custody_does_not() {
    let st = state(vec![
        disposal(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(1, 0),
                wallet: exch(),
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
        disposal(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 04 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(2, 0),
                wallet: cold(),
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    let ex = rows.iter().find(|r| r.wallet == exch()).unwrap();
    let sc = rows.iter().find(|r| r.wallet == cold()).unwrap();
    assert!(ex.box_needs_review, "exchange disposition must be flagged");
    assert!(!sc.box_needs_review, "self-custody must NOT be flagged");
    // box is still the conservative C default (never auto-assigned to A/B) regardless of the flag.
    assert_eq!(ex.box_, Form8949Box::C);
    assert_eq!(sc.box_, Form8949Box::C);
}

// ── Task 3 — Schedule D part totals ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

/// Hand-derived mixed golden: ST Σ and LT Σ (proceeds/basis/gain) over the year's legs, including a
/// signed LT loss leg, with an out-of-year disposal that must be excluded.
#[test]
fn schedule_d_part_totals_hand_derived_golden() {
    let st = state(vec![
        // 2024 — must be excluded from the 2025 totals.
        disposal(
            9,
            date!(2024 - 12 - 31),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                proceeds: dec!(999),
                basis: dec!(1),
                gain: dec!(998),
                term: Term::ShortTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
        // 2025 ST legs.
        disposal(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![
                DisposalLeg {
                    proceeds: dec!(100.00),
                    basis: dec!(60.00),
                    gain: dec!(40.00),
                    term: Term::ShortTerm,
                    ..base_leg()
                },
                DisposalLeg {
                    lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                    proceeds: dec!(50.00),
                    basis: dec!(30.00),
                    gain: dec!(20.00),
                    term: Term::ShortTerm,
                    ..base_leg()
                },
            ],
        ),
        // 2025 LT legs (one gain, one loss → signed sum).
        disposal(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 07 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![
                DisposalLeg {
                    proceeds: dec!(200.00),
                    basis: dec!(150.00),
                    gain: dec!(50.00),
                    term: Term::LongTerm,
                    ..base_leg()
                },
                DisposalLeg {
                    lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                    proceeds: dec!(10.00),
                    basis: dec!(40.00),
                    gain: dec!(-30.00),
                    term: Term::LongTerm,
                    ..base_leg()
                },
            ],
        ),
    ]);
    let sd = schedule_d(&st, 2025);
    // ST: proceeds 150, basis 90, gain 60.
    assert_eq!(sd.st.proceeds, dec!(150.00));
    assert_eq!(sd.st.cost_basis, dec!(90.00));
    assert_eq!(sd.st.gain, dec!(60.00));
    // LT: proceeds 210, basis 190, gain 20 (50 + (−30)).
    assert_eq!(sd.lt.proceeds, dec!(210.00));
    assert_eq!(sd.lt.cost_basis, dec!(190.00));
    assert_eq!(sd.lt.gain, dec!(20.00));
}

/// Year filter: only the year's legs are summed (mirrors the Form 8949 year filter).
#[test]
fn schedule_d_year_filter() {
    let st = state(vec![
        disposal(
            1,
            date!(2024 - 06 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                proceeds: dec!(500),
                basis: dec!(100),
                gain: dec!(400),
                term: Term::ShortTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
        disposal(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
            DisposeKind::Sell,
            vec![DisposalLeg {
                proceeds: dec!(70),
                basis: dec!(30),
                gain: dec!(40),
                term: Term::ShortTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            }],
        ),
    ]);
    let sd = schedule_d(&st, 2025);
    assert_eq!(sd.st.gain, dec!(40)); // only the 2025 leg
    assert_eq!(sd.st.proceeds, dec!(70));
}

/// An empty year (no in-year disposals) → all-zero part totals.
#[test]
fn schedule_d_empty_year_is_all_zero() {
    let st = state(vec![disposal(
        1,
        date!(2024 - 06 - 01),
        DisposeKind::Sell,
        vec![DisposalLeg {
            gain: dec!(400),
            ..base_leg()
        }],
    )]);
    let sd = schedule_d(&st, 2099);
    assert_eq!(sd.st.proceeds, Usd::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(sd.st.cost_basis, Usd::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(sd.st.gain, Usd::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(sd.lt.proceeds, Usd::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(sd.lt.cost_basis, Usd::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(sd.lt.gain, Usd::ZERO);
}

/// Form 8949 rows and Schedule D part totals agree by construction: Σ of the year's ST row gains ==
/// `schedule_d(..).st.gain` (and likewise LT). A consistency cross-check between the two builders.
#[test]
fn form_8949_rows_aggregate_to_schedule_d_totals() {
    let st = state(vec![disposal(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        DisposeKind::Sell,
        vec![
            DisposalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 0),
                proceeds: dec!(100),
                basis: dec!(60),
                gain: dec!(40),
                term: Term::ShortTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            },
            DisposalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                proceeds: dec!(200),
                basis: dec!(150),
                gain: dec!(50),
                term: Term::LongTerm,
                ..base_leg()
            },
        ],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8949(&st, 2025);
    let sd = schedule_d(&st, 2025);
    let st_gain: Usd = rows
        .iter()
        .filter(|r| r.part == Form8949Part::ShortTerm)
        .map(|r| r.gain)
        .sum();
    let lt_gain: Usd = rows
        .iter()
        .filter(|r| r.part == Form8949Part::LongTerm)
        .map(|r| r.gain)
        .sum();
    assert_eq!(st_gain, sd.st.gain);
    assert_eq!(lt_gain, sd.lt.gain);
}

// ── P2-C Task 2 — Form 8283 rows (`form_8283`) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Direct-state `Removal`/`RemovalLeg` fixtures (mirroring the disposal builders above) so section,
// how_acquired, first-leg convention, dates, year filter, and ordering are under exact control.

/// A baseline LT donation leg (100 sat, all-zero money, acquired 2025-01-01, purchased basis-source).
fn base_removal_leg() -> RemovalLeg {
    RemovalLeg {
        lot_id: lot(0, 0),
        sat: 100,
        basis: dec!(0),
        fmv_at_transfer: dec!(0),
        term: Term::LongTerm,
        basis_source: BasisSource::ComputedFromCost,
        acquired_at: date!(2025 - 01 - 01),
        pseudo: false,
    }
}
fn donation(
    seq: u64,
    removed_at: TaxDate,
    claimed_deduction: Usd,
    legs: Vec<RemovalLeg>,
) -> Removal {
    Removal {
        event: EventId::decision(seq),
        kind: RemovalKind::Donation,
        removed_at,
        legs,
        appraisal_required: false,
        donor_acquired_at: None,
        claimed_deduction: Some(claimed_deduction),
        donee: None,
    }
}
fn gift(seq: u64, removed_at: TaxDate, legs: Vec<RemovalLeg>) -> Removal {
    Removal {
        event: EventId::decision(seq),
        kind: RemovalKind::Gift,
        removed_at,
        legs,
        appraisal_required: false,
        donor_acquired_at: None,
        claimed_deduction: None,
        donee: None,
    }
}
fn state_removals(removals: Vec<Removal>) -> LedgerState {
    LedgerState {
        removals,
        ..Default::default()
    }
}

/// A donation with claimed deduction ≤ $5,000 → Section A (on the first/only leg).
#[test]
fn form8283_section_a_when_deduction_at_or_below_5k() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        dec!(5000), // exactly $5,000 → NOT > threshold → Section A
        vec![base_removal_leg()],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].section, Some(Form8283Section::A));
    // needs_review is true (no details passed — empty map).
    assert!(rows[0].needs_review);
}

/// A donation with claimed deduction > $5,000 → Section B + needs_review true.
#[test]
fn form8283_section_b_when_deduction_above_5k_and_needs_review() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        dec!(5000.01), // just over $5,000 → Section B
        vec![base_removal_leg()],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows[0].section, Some(Form8283Section::B));
    assert!(
        rows[0].needs_review,
        "Section B needs review when no details are provided"
    );
}

/// how_acquired maps from basis_source: Purchased / Gift / Other (income) / Review (ambiguous).
#[test]
fn form8283_how_acquired_mapping_incl_income_other_and_ambiguous_review() {
    let cases = [
        (
            BasisSource::ExchangeProvided,
            Form8283HowAcquired::Purchased,
        ),
        (
            BasisSource::ComputedFromCost,
            Form8283HowAcquired::Purchased,
        ),
        (BasisSource::GiftCarryover, Form8283HowAcquired::Gift),
        (BasisSource::GiftFmvFallback, Form8283HowAcquired::Gift),
        // FmvAtIncome → "Other" (NOT "income" — that is not a Form 8283 how-acquired category).
        (BasisSource::FmvAtIncome, Form8283HowAcquired::Other),
        // Origin-lost sources → "Review".
        (
            BasisSource::CarriedFromTransfer,
            Form8283HowAcquired::Review,
        ),
        (
            BasisSource::SafeHarborAllocated,
            Form8283HowAcquired::Review,
        ),
        (
            BasisSource::ReconstructedPerWallet,
            Form8283HowAcquired::Review,
        ),
    ];
    for (bs, expect) in cases {
        let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![RemovalLeg {
                basis_source: bs,
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }],
        )]);
        let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
        assert_eq!(
            rows[0].how_acquired, expect,
            "basis_source {bs:?} must map to how_acquired {expect:?}"
        );
    }
}

/// Multi-leg donation: section + claimed_deduction appear on the FIRST leg only (`Some`); subsequent
/// legs are `None` → a naive SUM over the deduction column equals the single per-donation total.
#[test]
fn form8283_claimed_deduction_first_leg_only_no_sum_double_count() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        dec!(52000), // > $5k → Section B
        vec![
            // pushed first, but HIGHER lot split → sorts AFTER; must NOT be the carrier.
            RemovalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                ..base_removal_leg()
            },
            // pushed second, LOWER lot split → sorts FIRST → the carrier row.
            RemovalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 0),
                ..base_removal_leg()
            },
        ],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    // Carrier is the smallest lot_id (0,0), which sorts first in the deterministic output.
    assert_eq!(rows[0].section, Some(Form8283Section::B));
    assert_eq!(rows[0].claimed_deduction, Some(dec!(52000)));
    assert_eq!(rows[1].section, None, "subsequent leg carries no section");
    assert_eq!(
        rows[1].claimed_deduction, None,
        "subsequent leg carries no deduction (no SUM double-count)"
    );
    // SUM over the deduction column == the single per-donation total.
    let sum: Usd = rows.iter().filter_map(|r| r.claimed_deduction).sum();
    assert_eq!(sum, dec!(52000));
}

/// appraiser is always EMPTY (unmodeled; Chunk 3). donee (when `removal.donee == None`) is also
/// empty. fmv_method is "qualified appraisal" for Section B (carrier row) and "" for Section A.
/// needs_review is always true.
#[test]
fn form8283_unmodeled_user_input_fields_and_fmv_method_honest() {
    // Section B (aggregate $60,000 > $5,000): carrier fmv_method = "qualified appraisal".
    // Fixture has donee: None → donee column is "" on the carrier row (unwrap_or_default).
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        dec!(60000),
        vec![base_removal_leg()],
    )]);
    let r = &form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new())[0];
    assert_eq!(r.donee, "", "None donee → empty string (unwrap_or_default)");
    assert_eq!(r.appraiser, "");
    assert_eq!(
        r.fmv_method, "qualified appraisal",
        "Section B carrier must have fmv_method = 'qualified appraisal'"
    );
    assert!(r.needs_review);

    // Section A (aggregate $1,000 ≤ $5,000): carrier fmv_method = "" (honest gap).
    let st_a = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        dec!(1000),
        vec![base_removal_leg()],
    )]);
    let r_a = &form_8283(&st_a, 2025, &BTreeMap::new())[0];
    assert_eq!(
        r_a.donee, "",
        "None donee → empty string (unwrap_or_default)"
    );
    assert_eq!(r_a.appraiser, "");
    assert_eq!(
        r_a.fmv_method, "",
        "Section A carrier must have fmv_method = '' (FMV method not modeled)"
    );
    assert!(r_a.needs_review);
}

/// D2 KAT (Chunk 2): `donee` is populated from `removal.donee` on the CARRIER row;
/// non-carrier legs are empty; `None` donee → `""` on the carrier row (unwrap_or_default).
#[test]
fn form8283_donee_populated_from_removal_on_carrier_row() {
    // ── Donation with donee = Some("Charity X") ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
    let with_donee = Removal {
        donee: Some("Charity X".to_string()),
        ..donation(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    };
    let st = state_removals(vec![with_donee]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    assert_eq!(
        rows[0].donee, "Charity X",
        "carrier row must carry the donee label from removal.donee"
    );

    // ── Donation with donee = None → carrier row donee == "" ────────────────────────────────────
    let no_donee = donation(
        2,
        date!(2025 - 04 - 01),
        dec!(1000),
        vec![base_removal_leg()],
    );
    let st2 = state_removals(vec![no_donee]);
    let rows2 = form_8283(&st2, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(
        rows2[0].donee, "",
        "None donee → empty string on carrier row"
    );

    // ── Multi-leg: carrier has the donee; non-carrier is empty ──────────────────────────────────
    let multi = Removal {
        donee: Some("Charity X".to_string()),
        ..donation(
            3,
            date!(2025 - 05 - 01),
            dec!(52000), // > $5,000 → Section B
            vec![
                RemovalLeg {
                    lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                    ..base_removal_leg()
                }, // non-carrier (higher lot_id)
                RemovalLeg {
                    lot_id: lot(0, 0),
                    ..base_removal_leg()
                }, // carrier (smallest lot_id)
            ],
        )
    };
    let st3 = state_removals(vec![multi]);
    let rows3 = form_8283(&st3, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows3.len(), 2);
    // Carrier (lot 0,0) sorts first due to deterministic ordering.
    assert_eq!(
        rows3[0].donee, "Charity X",
        "carrier row must have the donee label"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        rows3[1].donee, "",
        "non-carrier row must have empty donee (first-leg convention)"
    );
}

/// date_acquired = leg.acquired_at; date_contributed = removal.removed_at; basis/fmv from the leg.
#[test]
fn form8283_dates_and_amounts_match_the_leg_and_removal() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 09 - 15),
        dec!(4000),
        vec![RemovalLeg {
            basis: dec!(1000.00),
            fmv_at_transfer: dec!(4000.00),
            acquired_at: date!(2024 - 02 - 20),
            sat: 53_000_000,
            ..base_removal_leg()
        }],
    )]);
    let r = &form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new())[0];
    assert_eq!(r.date_acquired, date!(2024 - 02 - 20));
    assert_eq!(r.date_contributed, date!(2025 - 09 - 15));
    assert_eq!(r.cost_basis, dec!(1000.00));
    assert_eq!(r.fmv, dec!(4000.00));
    assert_eq!(r.description, "0.53000000 BTC");
}

/// Year filter: a prior-year (and future-year) donation is excluded from the year's rows.
#[test]
fn form8283_year_filter_excludes_out_of_year_donations() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        donation(
            1,
            date!(2024 - 12 - 31),
            dec!(9000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
            dec!(9000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
        donation(
            3,
            date!(2026 - 01 - 01),
            dec!(9000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].date_contributed, date!(2025 - 06 - 01));
}

/// Deterministic ordering: sorted by (removed_at, event id, lot_id) regardless of push order.
#[test]
fn form8283_deterministic_ordering_by_date_then_event_then_lot() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![RemovalLeg {
                sat: 300_000_000, // "3.00000000 BTC"
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }],
        ),
        donation(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![RemovalLeg {
                sat: 100_000_000, // "1.00000000 BTC"
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }],
        ),
        donation(
            3,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![RemovalLeg {
                sat: 200_000_000, // "2.00000000 BTC"
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    let order: Vec<&str> = rows.iter().map(|r| r.description.as_str()).collect();
    // 03-01/dec1 (1 BTC), then 03-01/dec3 (2 BTC), then 06-01/dec2 (3 BTC).
    assert_eq!(
        order,
        vec!["1.00000000 BTC", "2.00000000 BTC", "3.00000000 BTC"]
    );
}

/// A Gift (kind == Gift) produces NO Form 8283 row (a gift is not a charitable contribution).
#[test]
fn form8283_gift_produces_no_row() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        gift(1, date!(2025 - 03 - 01), vec![base_removal_leg()]),
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 04 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(
        rows.len(),
        1,
        "only the Donation yields a row; the Gift does not"
    );
    assert_eq!(rows[0].date_contributed, date!(2025 - 04 - 01));
}

// ── D1 KATs — §170(f)(11)(F) year-aggregate Section A/B ────────────────────────────────────────

/// D1 KAT 1: three donations $2,000+$2,000+$2,000 → aggregate $6,000 > $5,000 → ALL Section B.
/// This is the core §170(f)(11)(F) lock: each donation is individually < $5,000, but the year
/// aggregate triggers Section B. Pre-change: all three would have been Section A (per-donation).
#[test]
fn form8283_year_aggregate_triggers_section_b_when_sum_exceeds_5k() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        donation(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 02 - 01),
            dec!(2000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 05 - 01),
            dec!(2000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
        donation(
            3,
            date!(2025 - 08 - 01),
            dec!(2000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 3);
    // All three carrier rows must be Section B (uniform year-aggregate applies to all).
    for (i, row) in rows.iter().enumerate() {
        assert_eq!(
            row.section,
            Some(Form8283Section::B),
            "row {i}: expected Section B (aggregate $6,000 > $5,000); got {:?}",
            row.section
        );
        assert_eq!(
            row.fmv_method, "qualified appraisal",
            "row {i}: Section B carrier must have fmv_method = 'qualified appraisal'"
        );
    }
}

/// D1 KAT 2: two donations $1,000+$1,500 → aggregate $2,500 ≤ $5,000 → all Section A.
#[test]
fn form8283_year_aggregate_under_threshold_gives_section_a() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        donation(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(1000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 07 - 01),
            dec!(1500),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    for (i, row) in rows.iter().enumerate() {
        assert_eq!(
            row.section,
            Some(Form8283Section::A),
            "row {i}: expected Section A (aggregate $2,500 ≤ $5,000); got {:?}",
            row.section
        );
        assert_eq!(
            row.fmv_method, "",
            "row {i}: Section A carrier must have fmv_method = '' (honest gap)"
        );
    }
}

/// D1 KAT 3 (regression): single donation $8,000 → Section B (unchanged from pre-existing behavior).
#[test]
fn form8283_single_large_donation_section_b_regression() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 04 - 01),
        dec!(8000),
        vec![base_removal_leg()],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    assert_eq!(
        rows[0].section,
        Some(Form8283Section::B),
        "single $8,000 donation must be Section B"
    );
    assert_eq!(rows[0].fmv_method, "qualified appraisal");
}

/// D1 KAT 4 [R0-I2]: donations aggregating EXACTLY $5,000 → Section A.
/// §170(f)(11)(C) says "more than $5,000"; exactly $5,000 is NOT "more than" → Section A.
/// Distinguishes `>` (correct) from `>=` (wrong).
#[test]
fn form8283_exact_5000_aggregate_is_section_a_not_b() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        donation(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 01 - 01),
            dec!(3000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 06 - 01),
            dec!(2000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    for (i, row) in rows.iter().enumerate() {
        assert_eq!(
            row.section,
            Some(Form8283Section::A),
            "row {i}: aggregate exactly $5,000 must be Section A (§170(f)(11)(C) is '>'); \
             got {:?}",
            row.section
        );
    }
}

/// D1 KAT 5 [R0-I3]: Gift excluded from the aggregate — a Gift $10,000 + Donation $3,000 in the
/// same year. Gifts have `claimed_deduction == None` and are NOT §170 (they are §2503/Form 709).
/// They must NOT enter the donation aggregate. The Donation aggregate = $3,000 ≤ $5,000 → Section A.
#[test]
fn form8283_gift_fmv_excluded_from_donation_aggregate() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![
        // Gift with a large fmv — must NOT inflate the donation aggregate.
        gift(
            1,
            date!(2025 - 02 - 01),
            vec![RemovalLeg {
                fmv_at_transfer: dec!(10000),
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }],
        ),
        // Donation $3,000: aggregate = $3,000 (Gift excluded) → Section A.
        donation(
            2,
            date!(2025 - 05 - 01),
            dec!(3000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        ),
    ]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    // Only the Donation row appears; Gift has no Form 8283 row.
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    assert_eq!(
        rows[0].section,
        Some(Form8283Section::A),
        "Donation $3,000 must be Section A when Gift FMV is excluded from the aggregate; \
         got {:?}",
        rows[0].section
    );
    assert_eq!(
        rows[0].fmv_method, "",
        "Section A carrier must have fmv_method = '' (honest gap)"
    );
}

/// D3 KAT: fmv_method is set on the CARRIER row only — subsequent (non-carrier) legs get "".
/// For a Section B multi-leg donation: carrier = "qualified appraisal"; subsequent = "".
#[test]
fn form8283_fmv_method_carrier_only_subsequent_legs_empty() {
    let st = state_removals(vec![donation(
        1,
        date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
        dec!(52000), // > $5,000 → Section B
        vec![
            RemovalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }, // non-carrier (higher lot_id)
            RemovalLeg {
                lot_id: lot(0, 0),
                ..base_removal_leg()
            }, // carrier (smallest lot_id)
        ],
    )]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    // Carrier (lot 0,0) sorts first; non-carrier (lot 0,1) sorts second.
    assert_eq!(rows[0].section, Some(Form8283Section::B));
    assert_eq!(
        rows[0].fmv_method, "qualified appraisal",
        "carrier row must have fmv_method = 'qualified appraisal'"
    );
    assert_eq!(rows[1].section, None, "non-carrier: section must be None");
    assert_eq!(
        rows[1].fmv_method, "",
        "non-carrier row must have fmv_method = '' (carrier convention)"
    );
}

// ── Chunk-3b Task 2: form_8283 with DonationDetails ─────────────────────────────────────────

fn full_section_b_details() -> DonationDetails {
    DonationDetails {
        donee_name: "Test Charity".into(),
        donee_address: Some("123 Main St, Anytown USA".into()),
        donee_ein: Some("12-3456789".into()),
        appraiser_name: "Test Appraiser".into(),
        appraiser_address: Some("456 Appraiser Ave".into()),
        appraiser_tin: Some("987-65-4321".into()),
        appraiser_ptin: None,
        appraiser_qualifications: Some("Certified bitcoin appraiser, 10 yrs exp".into()),
        appraisal_date: Some(date!(2025 - 06 - 01)),
        fmv_method_override: None,
    }
}

fn skeletal_details() -> DonationDetails {
    DonationDetails {
        donee_name: "Test Charity".into(),
        donee_address: None,
        donee_ein: None,
        appraiser_name: "Test Appraiser".into(),
        appraiser_address: None,
        appraiser_tin: None,
        appraiser_ptin: None,
        appraiser_qualifications: None,
        appraisal_date: None,
        fmv_method_override: None,
    }
}

/// Full Section-B details (all §6695A fields) → needs_review false; names override.
#[test]
fn form8283_full_section_b_details_flips_needs_review() {
    let event = EventId::decision(42);
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        ..donation(
            42,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(52000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    }]);
    let mut map = BTreeMap::new();
    map.insert(event, full_section_b_details());
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &map);
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1);
    let r = &rows[0];
    assert_eq!(r.appraiser, "Test Appraiser");
    assert_eq!(r.donee, "Test Charity");
    assert!(
        !r.needs_review,
        "full Section-B details → needs_review must be false"
    );
    assert!(r.details.is_some(), "carrier row must embed the details");
}

/// Full Section-B details with fmv_method_override → override wins over section-derived default.
#[test]
fn form8283_full_section_b_with_fmv_override() {
    let event = EventId::decision(43);
    let mut d = full_section_b_details();
    d.fmv_method_override = Some("independent appraisal".into());
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        ..donation(
            43,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(52000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    }]);
    let mut map = BTreeMap::new();
    map.insert(event, d);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &map);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].fmv_method, "independent appraisal");
    assert!(!rows[0].needs_review);
}

/// [R0-I1] Skeletal Section-B details (only names) → needs_review stays true (honest gap).
/// This is the critical invariant: partial Section-B MUST NOT flip needs_review to false.
#[test]
fn form8283_skeletal_section_b_keeps_needs_review_true() {
    let event = EventId::decision(44);
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        ..donation(
            44,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(52000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    }]);
    let mut map = BTreeMap::new();
    map.insert(event, skeletal_details());
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &map);
    let r = &rows[0];
    assert_eq!(r.appraiser, "Test Appraiser", "appraiser name present");
    assert_eq!(r.donee, "Test Charity", "donee name present");
    assert!(
        r.needs_review,
        "[R0-I1] skeletal Section-B must keep needs_review true (honest gap — appraiser declaration incomplete)"
    );
}

/// Section-A with details → needs_review false (complete on presence).
#[test]
fn form8283_section_a_with_details_flips_needs_review() {
    let event = EventId::decision(45);
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        // ≤ $5,000 → Section A
        ..donation(
            45,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(3000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    }]);
    let mut map = BTreeMap::new();
    map.insert(event, skeletal_details()); // skeletal is complete-on-presence for Section A
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &map);
    let r = &rows[0];
    assert_eq!(r.section, Some(Form8283Section::A));
    assert!(
        !r.needs_review,
        "Section A: details present → needs_review must be false"
    );
}

/// Section-A with fmv_method_override → override replaces the section-derived "" empty string.
#[test]
fn form8283_section_a_fmv_override_resolves_deferral() {
    let event = EventId::decision(46);
    let mut d = skeletal_details();
    d.fmv_method_override = Some("broker valuation".into());
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        ..donation(
            46,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(3000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    }]);
    let mut map = BTreeMap::new();
    map.insert(event, d);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &map);
    assert_eq!(rows[0].fmv_method, "broker valuation");
    assert_eq!(rows[0].section, Some(Form8283Section::A));
}

/// No details → appraiser empty, needs_review true, donee from Removal.donee label.
#[test]
fn form8283_no_details_preserves_existing_behavior() {
    let event = EventId::decision(47);
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        donee: Some("Habitat For Humanity".into()),
        ..donation(
            47,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(52000),
            vec![base_removal_leg()],
        )
    }]);
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &BTreeMap::new());
    let r = &rows[0];
    assert_eq!(r.appraiser, "");
    assert!(r.needs_review);
    assert_eq!(r.donee, "Habitat For Humanity");
    assert_eq!(
        r.fmv_method, "qualified appraisal",
        "Section B: section-derived default"
    );
    assert!(r.details.is_none(), "no details → embed must be None");
}

/// Multi-leg: details embed on the CARRIER row only; non-carrier rows have None.
#[test]
fn form8283_details_embed_carrier_only_on_multi_leg() {
    let event = EventId::decision(48);
    let st = state_removals(vec![Removal {
        event: event.clone(),
        ..donation(
            48,
            date!(2025 - 03 - 01),
            dec!(52000),
            vec![
                RemovalLeg {
                    lot_id: lot(0, 1),
                    ..base_removal_leg()
                }, // non-carrier
                RemovalLeg {
                    lot_id: lot(0, 0),
                    ..base_removal_leg()
                }, // carrier (smallest)
            ],
        )
    }]);
    let mut map = BTreeMap::new();
    map.insert(event, full_section_b_details());
    let rows = form_8283(&st, 2025, &map);
    assert_eq!(rows.len(), 2);
    // carrier is rows[0] (lot 0,0 sorts before lot 0,1)
    assert!(
        rows[0].details.is_some(),
        "carrier row must have embedded details"
    );
    assert!(
        rows[1].details.is_none(),
        "non-carrier row must have None details"
    );
    assert!(
        !rows[0].needs_review,
        "carrier: full details → needs_review false"
    );
    assert!(
        rows[1].needs_review,
        "non-carrier: always needs_review true"
    );
}