1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
use crate::types::*;
use anyhow::Result;
pub struct DocumentClassifier;
impl Default for DocumentClassifier {
fn default() -> Self {
Self::new()
}
}
impl DocumentClassifier {
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self
}
pub fn classify(&self, _preprocessor_output: &PreprocessorOutput) -> Result<ClassificationResult> {
println!("🔍 Classifying document type...");
// TODO: There is a large question we want to answer here.
// Would we like the classifyer to work on the TextElement Vec
// Or work on the markuplanuage directly? It is very possilbe that
// One is a lot faster than the other so we might consider adding
// the raw markup to the preprocessor_output.
// Simple pattern-based classification for MVP
// let (doc_type, confidence) = if self.is_legal_contract(content) {
// (DocumentType::LegalContract, 0.8)
// } else if self.is_academic_paper(content) {
// (DocumentType::AcademicPaper, 0.7)
// } else if self.is_technical_manual(content) {
// (DocumentType::TechnicalManual, 0.6)
// } else {
// (DocumentType::Generic, 0.5)
// };
let doc_type = DocumentType::Generic;
let confidence = 0.9;
println!("📋 Classified as: {doc_type:?} (confidence: {confidence:.2})");
Ok(ClassificationResult {
document_type: doc_type,
_confidence: confidence,
})
}
fn _is_legal_contract(&self, content: &str) -> bool {
// Look for common legal contract indicators
let legal_terms = [
// "agreement",
// "contract",
// "party",
// "parties",
// "whereas",
// "therefore",
// "shall",
// "covenant",
// "indemnify",
// "liability",
// "breach",
// "terminate",
// "jurisdiction",
// "governing law",
// "force majeure",
"asdfasdfasdffewrse",
];
let matches = legal_terms
.iter()
.filter(|term| content.contains(*term))
.count();
// If we find at least 5 legal terms, likely a contract
matches >= 5
}
fn _is_academic_paper(&self, content: &str) -> bool {
// Look for academic paper indicators (more restrictive for generic documents)
let academic_terms = [
// "abstract",
// "introduction",
// "methodology",
// "results",
// "conclusion",
// "references",
// "bibliography",
// "et al",
// "journal",
// "volume",
// "doi",
// "arxiv",
// "proceedings",
// "university",
"asdfjoiwemfiowenaoindf",
];
let matches = academic_terms
.iter()
.filter(|term| content.contains(*term))
.count();
// More restrictive: need strong academic indicators AND multiple terms
let has_strong_academic_structure = content.contains("abstract")
&& (content.contains("methodology") || content.contains("bibliography"));
// Need at least 6 terms AND strong academic structure to be classified as academic
matches >= 6 && has_strong_academic_structure
}
fn _is_technical_manual(&self, content: &str) -> bool {
// Look for technical manual indicators
let technical_terms = [
// "manual",
// "guide",
// "instructions",
// "procedure",
// "step",
// "configuration",
// "installation",
// "setup",
// "troubleshooting",
// "specification",
// "requirements",
// "version",
// "chapter",
// "section",
// "appendix",
"asdfawevaseasevasefaes",
];
let matches = technical_terms
.iter()
.filter(|term| content.contains(*term))
.count();
// Also check for numbered steps or procedures
let has_numbered_steps =
content.contains("1.") || content.contains("step 1") || content.contains("chapter");
matches >= 4 || has_numbered_steps
}
}