axond 0.3.15

Axond — a stateless, single-binary, self-hosted AI gateway: one place for provider keys, model routing, usage, and telemetry.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
//! What convergence promises a fleet, asserted end to end.
//!
//! These tests drive the real [`Reconciler`] against the domain's contract
//! oracle ([`InMemoryControlPlane`]) and the real publication seam
//! ([`AppState`]), because the properties being tested are properties of that
//! composition: a mock sink could show that `publish` was called, but only the
//! actual `ArcSwap` shows that an in-flight request keeps the snapshot it
//! started with.
//!
//! Determinism comes from three injections rather than from sleeping: the
//! control plane is in-memory, the clock is manual, and the loop's timers run on
//! Tokio's paused clock. No test here is timing-sensitive.

use std::sync::Arc;
use std::time::Duration;

use super::compile::testing::{AliasProjection, bootstrap, env};
use super::lkg::testing::{KEY, cache_path};
use super::status::testing::ManualClock;
use super::*;
use crate::backends::control_plane::ControlPlaneStore;
use crate::budget::NoBudget;
use crate::desired_state::oracle::InMemoryControlPlane;
use crate::desired_state::{DesiredState, ExpectedRevision, RevisionId, fixtures};
use crate::state::AppState;
use crate::telemetry;
use crate::usage::{UsageFanout, UsageSink};

/// One replica: a control plane, a compiler, the `ArcSwap` it publishes into,
/// and a clock the test owns.
struct Replica {
    store: Arc<InMemoryControlPlane>,
    state: AppState,
    clock: ManualClock,
    reconciler: Arc<Reconciler>,
}

impl Replica {
    /// A replica whose projection targets the bootstrap's `openai` provider, so
    /// every published revision compiles.
    fn serving(store: &Arc<InMemoryControlPlane>) -> Self {
        Self::build(store, "openai", None)
    }

    /// A replica whose projection targets a provider nobody defines, so every
    /// candidate is refused by the same graph gate boot applies.
    fn refusing(store: &Arc<InMemoryControlPlane>) -> Self {
        Self::build(store, "nonexistent", None)
    }

    fn with_cache(store: &Arc<InMemoryControlPlane>, cache: LastKnownGood) -> Self {
        Self::build(store, "openai", Some(cache))
    }

    fn build(
        store: &Arc<InMemoryControlPlane>,
        provider: &'static str,
        cache: Option<LastKnownGood>,
    ) -> Self {
        let sinks: Vec<Box<dyn UsageSink>> = Vec::new();
        // The boot snapshot: generation 0, serving whatever the file said. Every
        // convergence assertion is relative to this.
        let state = AppState::new(
            bootstrap(),
            &env(),
            UsageFanout::new(sinks),
            Box::new(NoBudget),
        )
        .expect("the bootstrap config is servable");
        let clock = ManualClock::new();
        let reconciler = Arc::new(Reconciler::new(
            Arc::clone(store) as Arc<dyn ControlPlaneStore>,
            Arc::new(RevisionCompiler::new(
                bootstrap(),
                env(),
                AliasProjection { provider },
            )),
            Arc::new(state.clone()),
            settings(),
            cache,
            Arc::new(clock.clone()),
        ));
        Self {
            store: Arc::clone(store),
            state,
            clock,
            reconciler,
        }
    }

    fn report(&self) -> RevisionReport {
        self.reconciler.report()
    }

    /// The aliases this replica is serving right now.
    fn served_aliases(&self) -> Vec<String> {
        self.state
            .config()
            .config
            .model
            .iter()
            .map(|model| model.name.clone())
            .collect()
    }

    fn generation(&self) -> u64 {
        self.state.config().generation
    }
}

/// Tight but valid pacing, so a paused-clock test advances milliseconds rather
/// than seconds.
fn settings() -> ConvergenceSettings {
    ConvergenceSettings {
        poll_interval: Duration::from_millis(100),
        target: Duration::from_secs(1),
        backoff: BackoffPolicy {
            initial: Duration::from_millis(100),
            max: Duration::from_secs(4),
            multiplier: 2,
        },
    }
}

fn control_plane() -> Arc<InMemoryControlPlane> {
    Arc::new(InMemoryControlPlane::new())
}

/// Publish `state` as the newest revision, the way an administrator would.
async fn publish(
    store: &InMemoryControlPlane,
    key: &str,
    expected: ExpectedRevision,
    state: DesiredState,
) -> RevisionId {
    store
        .publish_revision(fixtures::candidate(expected, key, state))
        .await
        .expect("the candidate is valid")
        .id
}

/// The base case: a replica that starts behind catches up, and what it serves
/// afterwards is what desired state says.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_replica_converges_to_the_desired_revision_and_serves_it() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let published = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);

    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 0, "the boot snapshot is generation 0");
    let outcome = replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;

    assert!(
        matches!(
            outcome,
            Outcome::Published { revision, generation, .. }
                if revision == published && generation == 1
        ),
        "{outcome:?}"
    );
    let report = replica.report();
    assert!(report.converged());
    assert_eq!(report.desired, Some(published));
    assert_eq!(report.loaded, Some(published));
    assert_eq!(report.active, Some(published));
    assert_eq!(report.source, Some(SnapshotSource::ControlPlane));
    assert_eq!(report.lag, Duration::ZERO);
    assert_eq!(report.consecutive_failures, 0);
    assert!(report.last_rejection.is_none());
    // The published revision is what is being *served*, not merely recorded.
    assert!(replica.served_aliases().contains(&"fast".to_owned()));
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 1);
}

/// A converged replica still reads desired state — that read is how it detects
/// the next change and how it proves the control plane is reachable — but it does
/// not republish, because a republication would bump the generation and reset
/// per-target circuits for no reason.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_converged_replica_does_not_republish_what_it_is_already_serving() {
    let store = control_plane();
    publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;

    for _ in 0..5 {
        let outcome = replica
            .reconciler
            .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
            .await;
        assert!(
            matches!(outcome, Outcome::AlreadyConverged { .. }),
            "{outcome:?}"
        );
    }
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 1, "no spurious republication");
}

/// A second revision converges on top of the first, and the replica ends up
/// serving the newer alias set rather than a union of both.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_newer_revision_replaces_the_previous_one_wholesale() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let first = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;
    assert!(replica.served_aliases().contains(&"fast".to_owned()));

    let second = publish(
        &store,
        "second",
        ExpectedRevision::Exactly(first),
        fixtures::state_with_renamed_alias(),
    )
    .await;
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;

    assert_eq!(replica.report().active, Some(second));
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 2);
    let aliases = replica.served_aliases();
    assert!(aliases.contains(&"quick".to_owned()), "{aliases:?}");
    assert!(
        !aliases.contains(&"fast".to_owned()),
        "the previous revision's alias is gone, not merged: {aliases:?}"
    );
}

/// The reason polling is the correctness mechanism: nothing notifies this
/// replica, and it converges anyway once its poll interval elapses.
#[tokio::test(start_paused = true)]
async fn a_missed_notification_is_recovered_by_the_poll() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    let signal = Arc::new(ChangeSignal::new());
    let (stop, stopped) = tokio::sync::oneshot::channel::<()>();
    let loop_reconciler = Arc::clone(&replica.reconciler);
    let task = tokio::spawn(async move {
        loop_reconciler
            .run(Arc::new(ChangeSignal::new()), async {
                let _ = stopped.await;
            })
            .await;
    });

    // Published *without* notifying anyone, which is what a dropped `NOTIFY`
    // looks like from a replica's point of view.
    let published = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    assert_eq!(replica.report().active, None, "not converged yet");

    advance_until(&replica, |report| report.active == Some(published)).await;
    assert!(replica.served_aliases().contains(&"fast".to_owned()));

    drop(signal);
    let _ = stop.send(());
    task.await.expect("the loop stops when shutdown completes");
}

/// And the reason notifications are worth having: the same convergence happens
/// without waiting for the poll interval at all.
#[tokio::test(start_paused = true)]
async fn a_notification_converges_before_the_next_poll() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    let signal = Arc::new(ChangeSignal::new());
    let (stop, stopped) = tokio::sync::oneshot::channel::<()>();
    let loop_reconciler = Arc::clone(&replica.reconciler);
    let listener = Arc::clone(&signal);
    let task = tokio::spawn(async move {
        loop_reconciler
            .run(listener, async {
                let _ = stopped.await;
            })
            .await;
    });

    let published = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    signal.notify();
    for _ in 0..32 {
        if replica.report().active == Some(published) {
            break;
        }
        tokio::task::yield_now().await;
    }
    assert_eq!(
        replica.report().active,
        Some(published),
        "a notification converges without the clock advancing"
    );

    let _ = stop.send(());
    task.await.expect("the loop stops");
}

/// Malformed desired state — here, a revision that does not project onto a
/// servable graph — is refused with *nothing* published: same generation, same
/// aliases, and a report that says which stage refused it.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_revision_that_fails_the_boot_gate_publishes_nothing() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let published = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::refusing(&store);
    let before = replica.served_aliases();

    let outcome = replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;

    assert!(
        matches!(
            outcome,
            Outcome::Rejected { revision, reason }
                if revision == Some(published) && reason == "validation"
        ),
        "{outcome:?}"
    );
    let report = replica.report();
    assert!(!report.converged());
    assert_eq!(report.desired, Some(published));
    assert_eq!(report.loaded, None, "a refused candidate never loaded");
    assert_eq!(report.active, None);
    assert_eq!(report.generation, 0);
    assert_eq!(report.consecutive_failures, 1);
    let rejection = report.last_rejection.expect("a reason is reported");
    assert_eq!(rejection.reason, "validation");
    assert!(
        rejection.detail.contains("undefined provider"),
        "{}",
        rejection.detail
    );
    // Nothing about what is being served changed.
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 0);
    assert_eq!(replica.served_aliases(), before);
}

/// A control-plane outage degrades to staleness: the replica keeps serving the
/// revision it already has, reports growing lag, and converges when Postgres
/// comes back.
#[tokio::test]
async fn an_outage_keeps_the_previous_revision_serving_and_reports_the_lag() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let first = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;
    let serving = replica.served_aliases();

    // A newer revision exists, and then the control plane goes away before this
    // replica ever sees it.
    let second = publish(
        &store,
        "second",
        ExpectedRevision::Exactly(first),
        fixtures::state_with_renamed_alias(),
    )
    .await;
    store.set_unavailable(true);

    for attempt in 1..=3 {
        let outcome = replica
            .reconciler
            .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
            .await;
        assert!(
            matches!(
                outcome,
                Outcome::Rejected {
                    reason: "unavailable",
                    ..
                }
            ),
            "{outcome:?}"
        );
        assert_eq!(replica.report().consecutive_failures, attempt);
        replica.clock.advance(Duration::from_secs(2));
    }

    let lagging = replica.report();
    assert_eq!(
        lagging.active,
        Some(first),
        "still serving the old revision"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        lagging.desired,
        Some(first),
        "desired is unreadable, not lost"
    );
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 1);
    assert_eq!(replica.served_aliases(), serving);
    assert_eq!(
        lagging.last_rejection.map(|rejection| rejection.reason),
        Some("unavailable")
    );

    store.set_unavailable(false);
    let outcome = replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;
    assert!(
        matches!(outcome, Outcome::Published { revision, .. } if revision == second),
        "{outcome:?}"
    );
    let recovered = replica.report();
    assert!(recovered.converged());
    assert_eq!(recovered.consecutive_failures, 0);
    assert!(
        recovered.last_rejection.is_none(),
        "a success clears the reported failure"
    );
    assert_eq!(recovered.lag, Duration::ZERO);
}

/// Lag is what an operator alerts on, so it has to grow while a replica is stuck
/// and be measured from the moment it fell behind.
#[tokio::test]
async fn lag_grows_while_a_replica_cannot_reach_the_desired_revision() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let first = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::refusing(&store);
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;

    assert_eq!(
        replica.report().lag,
        Duration::ZERO,
        "measured, not guessed"
    );
    replica.clock.advance(Duration::from_secs(45));
    let report = replica.report();
    assert_eq!(report.desired, Some(first));
    assert_eq!(report.lag, Duration::from_secs(45));
    assert!(
        report.lag > settings().target,
        "past the documented convergence target, which is what an alert fires on"
    );
}

/// Backoff is bounded and monotone: repeated failures widen the retry delay up to
/// the ceiling and stay there, so an outage costs a bounded number of attempts
/// per replica instead of a hot loop.
#[tokio::test]
async fn repeated_failures_widen_the_retry_delay_up_to_the_ceiling() {
    let store = control_plane();
    publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    store.set_unavailable(true);
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);

    let mut delays = Vec::new();
    let mut backoff = Backoff::new(settings().backoff);
    for _ in 0..8 {
        replica
            .reconciler
            .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
            .await;
        delays.push(backoff.fail());
    }
    assert_eq!(
        delays,
        vec![
            Duration::from_millis(100),
            Duration::from_millis(200),
            Duration::from_millis(400),
            Duration::from_millis(800),
            Duration::from_millis(1_600),
            Duration::from_millis(3_200),
            Duration::from_secs(4),
            Duration::from_secs(4),
        ],
        "exponential, then saturated at the ceiling"
    );
    assert_eq!(replica.report().consecutive_failures, 8);
}

/// The loop-level version of the same property: over a fixed window of paused
/// time, a replica whose control plane is down makes a number of attempts bounded
/// by its backoff rather than spinning.
#[tokio::test(start_paused = true)]
async fn a_replica_whose_control_plane_is_down_does_not_hot_loop() {
    let store = control_plane();
    publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    store.set_unavailable(true);
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    let (stop, stopped) = tokio::sync::oneshot::channel::<()>();
    let loop_reconciler = Arc::clone(&replica.reconciler);
    let task = tokio::spawn(async move {
        loop_reconciler
            .run(Arc::new(ChangeSignal::new()), async {
                let _ = stopped.await;
            })
            .await;
    });

    // Thirty seconds of outage. With a 100ms initial delay doubling to a 4s
    // ceiling, an unbounded loop would attempt hundreds of times.
    for _ in 0..30 {
        tokio::time::advance(Duration::from_secs(1)).await;
        tokio::task::yield_now().await;
    }
    let failures = replica.report().consecutive_failures;
    assert!(
        (2..=16).contains(&failures),
        "bounded retries over 30s of outage, got {failures}"
    );
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 0, "nothing was published");

    let _ = stop.send(());
    task.await.expect("the loop stops");
}

/// A replica that boots while the control plane is unreachable serves its signed
/// cache rather than failing to start — the case that keeps an outage from also
/// freezing fleet size.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_cold_boot_during_an_outage_restores_the_signed_snapshot() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let published = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let path = cache_path("cold-boot");

    // The replica that was running before the outage exports what it served.
    let warm = Replica::with_cache(
        &store,
        LastKnownGood::new(&path, KEY).expect("a long enough key"),
    );
    warm.reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;
    assert!(path.exists(), "converging exported the cache");

    // A fresh replica starts with the control plane down.
    store.set_unavailable(true);
    let cold = Replica::with_cache(
        &store,
        LastKnownGood::new(&path, KEY).expect("a long enough key"),
    );
    let restored = cold.reconciler.bootstrap().await.expect("the cache serves");

    assert_eq!(restored, published);
    let report = cold.report();
    assert_eq!(report.active, Some(published));
    assert_eq!(report.source, Some(SnapshotSource::LastKnownGood));
    assert!(cold.served_aliases().contains(&"fast".to_owned()));
    assert_eq!(cold.generation(), 1);

    // And once the control plane returns, the same replica converges normally and
    // stops reporting the cache as its source.
    store.set_unavailable(false);
    let second = publish(
        &store,
        "second",
        ExpectedRevision::Exactly(published),
        fixtures::state_with_renamed_alias(),
    )
    .await;
    cold.reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;
    let converged = cold.report();
    assert_eq!(converged.active, Some(second));
    assert_eq!(converged.source, Some(SnapshotSource::ControlPlane));

    let _ = std::fs::remove_file(&path);
}

/// Without a cache, a cold boot during an outage refuses to start rather than
/// serving an empty configuration while reporting itself healthy.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_cold_boot_during_an_outage_without_a_cache_refuses_to_start() {
    let store = control_plane();
    publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    store.set_unavailable(true);
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);

    let error = replica
        .reconciler
        .bootstrap()
        .await
        .expect_err("there is nothing to serve");
    assert!(
        matches!(error, BootstrapError::Unavailable { .. }),
        "{error}"
    );
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 0);
}

/// A reachable control plane with nothing published is also a refusal to start:
/// an empty stateful deployment has no aliases and no keys, and starting anyway
/// would report a healthy replica that answers nothing.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_cold_boot_against_an_empty_control_plane_refuses_to_start() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    let error = replica
        .reconciler
        .bootstrap()
        .await
        .expect_err("nothing has been published");
    assert!(matches!(error, BootstrapError::Empty), "{error}");
}

/// A revision that cannot be compiled is fatal at boot, and specifically *not*
/// answered from the cache: booting an older cached revision would silently serve
/// state an operator already replaced.
#[tokio::test]
async fn a_boot_revision_that_does_not_compile_is_fatal_even_with_a_cache() {
    let store = control_plane();
    publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let path = cache_path("boot-rejected");
    let replica = Replica::build(
        &store,
        "nonexistent",
        Some(LastKnownGood::new(&path, KEY).expect("a long enough key")),
    );

    let error = replica
        .reconciler
        .bootstrap()
        .await
        .expect_err("the desired revision is unservable");
    assert!(matches!(error, BootstrapError::Rejected { .. }), "{error}");
    assert!(!path.exists(), "nothing unservable was ever cached");
}

/// The one-snapshot-per-request guarantee, asserted against the real `ArcSwap`:
/// a request that took its snapshot under revision *N* keeps resolving against
/// *N* — same generation, same aliases — after *N+1* becomes active. This covers
/// buffered and streaming requests alike, because both hold exactly this `Arc`
/// for their lifetime (a stream holds it across every relayed chunk).
#[tokio::test]
async fn an_in_flight_request_keeps_the_revision_it_started_under() {
    let store = control_plane();
    let first = publish(&store, "first", ExpectedRevision::Empty, fixtures::state()).await;
    let replica = Replica::serving(&store);
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;

    // A request starts: exactly what the request path does, once, at the top.
    let in_flight = replica.state.config();
    assert_eq!(in_flight.generation, 1);
    assert!(
        in_flight
            .config
            .model
            .iter()
            .any(|model| model.name == "fast")
    );

    // A newer revision becomes active mid-request.
    publish(
        &store,
        "second",
        ExpectedRevision::Exactly(first),
        fixtures::state_with_renamed_alias(),
    )
    .await;
    replica
        .reconciler
        .converge_once(telemetry::CONVERGENCE_POLLED)
        .await;
    assert_eq!(replica.generation(), 2);
    assert!(replica.served_aliases().contains(&"quick".to_owned()));

    // The in-flight request's view is unchanged: it finishes, or relays its
    // stream to completion, against the revision it started under.
    assert_eq!(in_flight.generation, 1);
    assert!(
        in_flight
            .config
            .model
            .iter()
            .any(|model| model.name == "fast"),
        "the alias the request resolved is still resolvable"
    );
    assert!(
        !in_flight
            .config
            .model
            .iter()
            .any(|model| model.name == "quick"),
        "and the newer revision has not leaked into it"
    );

    // Requests that start now see the new revision — that is the difference
    // between pinning a request and pinning a replica.
    assert_eq!(replica.state.config().generation, 2);
}

/// Advance the paused clock until `predicate` holds, so a loop test asserts on a
/// condition rather than on a sleep duration.
async fn advance_until(replica: &Replica, predicate: impl Fn(&RevisionReport) -> bool) {
    for _ in 0..64 {
        if predicate(&replica.reconciler.report()) {
            return;
        }
        tokio::time::advance(Duration::from_millis(50)).await;
        tokio::task::yield_now().await;
    }
    panic!(
        "the replica never reached the expected state: {:?}",
        replica.reconciler.report()
    );
}