Module aws_sdk_workdocs::types

Data structures used by operation inputs/outputs.

Modules

• builders
  Builders
• error
  Error types that Amazon WorkDocs can respond with.

Structs

• Activity

  Describes the activity information.

• Comment

  Describes a comment.

• CommentMetadata

  Describes the metadata of a comment.

• DateRangeType

  Filters results based on timestamp range (in epochs).

• DocumentMetadata

  Describes the document.

• DocumentVersionMetadata

  Describes a version of a document.

• Filters

  Filters results based on entity metadata.

• FolderMetadata

  Describes a folder.

• GroupMetadata

  Describes the metadata of a user group.

• LongRangeType

  Filter based on size (in bytes).

• NotificationOptions

  Set of options which defines notification preferences of given action.

• Participants

  Describes the users or user groups.

• PermissionInfo

  Describes the permissions.

• Principal

  Describes a resource.

• ResourceMetadata

  Describes the metadata of a resource.

• ResourcePath

  Describes the path information of a resource.

• ResourcePathComponent

  Describes the resource path.

• ResponseItem

  List of Documents, Folders, Comments, and Document Versions matching the query.

• SearchPrincipalType

  Filter based on UserIds or GroupIds.

• SearchSortResult

  The result of the sort operation.

• SharePrincipal

  Describes the recipient type and ID, if available.

• ShareResult

  Describes the share results of a resource.

• StorageRuleType

  Describes the storage for a user.

• Subscription

  Describes a subscription.

• UploadMetadata

  Describes the upload.

• User

  Describes a user.

• UserMetadata

  Describes the metadata of the user.

• UserStorageMetadata

  Describes the storage for a user.

Enums

• ActivityType
  When writing a match expression against ActivityType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• AdditionalResponseFieldType
  When writing a match expression against AdditionalResponseFieldType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• BooleanEnumType
  When writing a match expression against BooleanEnumType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• CommentStatusType
  When writing a match expression against CommentStatusType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• CommentVisibilityType
  When writing a match expression against CommentVisibilityType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ContentCategoryType
  When writing a match expression against ContentCategoryType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• DocumentSourceType
  When writing a match expression against DocumentSourceType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• DocumentStatusType
  When writing a match expression against DocumentStatusType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• DocumentThumbnailType
  When writing a match expression against DocumentThumbnailType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• DocumentVersionStatus
  When writing a match expression against DocumentVersionStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• FolderContentType
  When writing a match expression against FolderContentType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• LanguageCodeType
  When writing a match expression against LanguageCodeType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• LocaleType
  When writing a match expression against LocaleType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• OrderByFieldType
  When writing a match expression against OrderByFieldType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• OrderType
  When writing a match expression against OrderType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• PrincipalRoleType
  When writing a match expression against PrincipalRoleType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• PrincipalType
  When writing a match expression against PrincipalType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ResourceCollectionType
  When writing a match expression against ResourceCollectionType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ResourceSortType
  When writing a match expression against ResourceSortType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ResourceStateType
  When writing a match expression against ResourceStateType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ResourceType
  When writing a match expression against ResourceType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ResponseItemType
  When writing a match expression against ResponseItemType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• RolePermissionType
  When writing a match expression against RolePermissionType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• RoleType
  When writing a match expression against RoleType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• SearchCollectionType
  When writing a match expression against SearchCollectionType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• SearchQueryScopeType
  When writing a match expression against SearchQueryScopeType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• SearchResourceType
  When writing a match expression against SearchResourceType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• ShareStatusType
  When writing a match expression against ShareStatusType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• SortOrder
  When writing a match expression against SortOrder, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• StorageType
  When writing a match expression against StorageType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• SubscriptionProtocolType
  When writing a match expression against SubscriptionProtocolType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• SubscriptionType
  When writing a match expression against SubscriptionType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• UserFilterType
  When writing a match expression against UserFilterType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• UserSortType
  When writing a match expression against UserSortType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• UserStatusType
  When writing a match expression against UserStatusType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
• UserType
  When writing a match expression against UserType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.