Introduction
A struct for recording execution status of async tasks with async methods.
Functions:
- Able to host
Futures and query whether they are not found, successful, failed, or running. - Able to host
Futures to revoke the succeededFutures and make them not found.
Dependency:
- Depend on
tokiowith featurert, so cannot use other async runtimes. - Depend on scc for async
HashSet.
Use this crate if:
- Easy to generate an unique
task_id(not necessarilyString) for a future (task). - Don't want tasks with the same
task_idto succeed more than once. - Want to record and query all succeeded tasks and failed tasks.
- Want to handle every task in the same state (not just focus on one state).
- Need linearizable query.
- Want to revoke a task, and don't want the revoking to succeed more than once.
A recorder can only use one task_id type. The type of task_id should be:
Eq + Hash + Clone + Send + Sync + 'static- Cheap to clone (sometimes can use
Arc).
Usage
Launch a task with a unique task_id and a Future by launch.
Query the state of the task with its task_id
by query_task_state or query_task_state_quick.
Revoke a task with its task_id and a Future for revoking by revoke_task_block.
Skills
Remember that you can add anything in the Future to achieve the functionality you want.
For example:
- Handle your
ResultinFuture, and then return empty resultResult<(),()>. - Send a message to a one shot channel at the end of the
Futureto notify upper level that "this task done". Don't forget to consider usingtokio::spawnwhen the channel may not complete sending immediately. - Set other callback functions.
It's still efficient to store metadata of tasks at external scc::HashMap (task_id -> metadata).
It is recommended to directly look at the source code (about 150 line) if there is any confusion.
When Shouldn't Use This Crate
The consumption of all operations in this crate and cloning times
is about two to three times that of the implementation using scc::Hashmap.
This crate use three HashSet to make it easy to operate all tasks in the same state,
And two more HashSet for linearizability of query and supporting revoking operation.
Note that scc's containers have less contention in single access when it grows larger.
Therefore, if you don't need operating every task in the same state,
then just use scc::HashMap (task_id -> task_status) to build a simpler implementation,
which might have less contention and cloning, but more expansive to iterate.
And the scc::HashMap::update_async could be a powerful tool for atomic operations.
You should also avoid using this crate if you just want to handle every task in only one state.
For example, if you just want to manage the failed tasks,
then you should use scc::HashMap to record tasks' states,
and insert the failed tasks into an external Arc<scc::HashSet> in Future.
Version less than 1.1.1 has bugs.
For more usage, nature and proofs, please refer to Document.