# Preview approval
`push-preview` and `push-published` carry ADR-0023 (`work.preview-approval`,
fleet decision corpus): a commit that changes a user interface is published
only after the person approved **that commit**, seen on localhost.
The rule exists because interface regressions kept reaching pull requests and
deployed sites after the agent had checked its own screen. The person's eyes
are the check that does not share the agent's blind spots, and localhost is
where rejecting a screen costs one sentence instead of a fix pull request and
a release.
## The flow
The person works on several projects at once and does not remember where
this one stood. A bare "[preview f0223d3] Ship website-builder@f0223d3?"
gives them nothing to decide with, so a preview reaches them as a **guide**
(fleet rule `work.preview-is-guided`), three ways at once: the brief in the
terminal, a local page, and the app already open in their browser.
1. **Verify.** The agent drives the changed route in a real browser, checks the
console and network, and takes before and after screenshots.
2. **Write the guide** — markdown, **outside the worktree**
(`~/.claude/amont-agent/attestations/<sha>/guide.md` by convention, the
screenshots beside it), because a file inside it, or the page rendered
beside it, would dirty the commit it describes. The format is
[below](#the-guide).
3. **Serve and register.** From the clean worktree, at the commit to be
pushed:
```sh
amont-agent preview register --url http://localhost:5173/settings \
--guide ~/.claude/amont-agent/attestations/abc1234/guide.md
```
Run it as its own foreground command, optionally after `cd` into the
worktree:
```sh
cd ~/Developer/app-wt-settings && amont-agent preview register --url … --guide …
```
It refuses a dirty tree, a non-commit `HEAD`, a guide inside the worktree
and a guide missing a required section (exit 1; stderr lists exactly what
is missing). Otherwise it renders the guide to **`index.html` beside it**
and prints one JSON object — `id`, `repo`, `commit`, `url`, `guide`,
`page` (absolute) and `page_url` (`file://`). `--open` also hands the page
to the platform opener (`open`, `xdg-open`, `cmd /c start`) without
waiting; failing to open never fails the command.
The `PostToolUse` hook binds that output to the session and to the
person's current prompt, in the repository the command ran in — the
leading `cd`s followed — which must still be the printed repository at
the printed `HEAD`; the journal line names the page. The only chaining
accepted is leading `cd <literal path>` clauses joined by `&&`. A
registration after any other program, after `;` or `||`, piped, in the
background or behind a substitution (`cd $(…)`) is not bound; the
journal says why.
4. **Open the app and the page.** Before asking, the agent opens the app in
the person's browser **at the state the first step reaches** (the panel
already open, the form already filled) and the rendered page beside it.
That is the agent's job — the `worktree-task` skill's F7, with Claude in
Chrome — not this binary's: `register` only renders the page and, with
`--open`, opens it.
5. **Ask, in the same turn.** The brief first — the guide's sections, in the
terminal — then one `AskUserQuestion` whose text carries `[preview <id>]`
and lists every `repo@sha` it approves, with options exactly `Approve`,
`Request changes`, `Hold` — no "(Recommended)" suffix. The marked
question itself is unchanged.
6. **Push after `Approve`.** The approval covers that commit; a new commit,
amend or rebase needs a new preview.
`--attestation <file>` is accepted for 2.21.0 only, as a deprecated alias of
`--guide`: the file is read as the guide and refused unless it is one.
## The guide
Markdown with these five **H2** sections. Headings match with emoji,
punctuation and case aside (`## 📍 Where we are:` is `Where we are`); the
page shows them in this order, then any other section the guide adds.
| `Where we are` | project, branch and plan, and why the person is asked. Its first line is the page's title | present, not empty |
| `What you should see` | in their words; "nothing new" when that is the point | present, not empty |
| `Try it` | numbered steps: the exact URL, each click named by its visible label and position, and after each step what should appear | at least one numbered step (`1.`) and one http(s) URL |
| `Reference` | before and after screenshots | present, not empty |
| `Already checked` | what the agent verified, and what to look at especially | present, not empty |
A full example (`guide.md`, with `before.png`, `after.png` and `panel.png`
beside it):
```markdown
# Settings: Save moves to the header
## 📍 Where we are
duro-app, branch `feat/settings-save`, plan **Settings panel** (phase 2 of 3).
You are asked because the Save button moved; nothing else on the page changed.
## What you should see
The **Save** button now sits in the header, top right, instead of at the
bottom of the form. Saving works exactly as before.
## 👉 Try it
1. Open http://localhost:5173/settings
- You should see the Settings form, with **Save** in the header, top right.
2. Change **Display name** (first field) to anything.
- **Save** turns from grey to blue.
3. Click **Save**, top right.
- A green toast "Saved" appears bottom left, and **Save** is grey again.
## Reference
## Already checked
- `/settings` at 1280 and 390 px wide: no console error, no failed request.
- Keyboard: Tab reaches **Save** right after the page title.
- Look especially at the narrow window: the button must not cover the title.
```
The page is one self-contained file: inline CSS readable in light and dark
(`prefers-color-scheme`), no script, no external asset. Its title is
`repo@shortsha — <first line of Where we are>`; under it, a large **Open the
app** link to `--url`, then the sections. Images (``,
relative to the guide's directory) render inline; a missing one is a warning
on stderr, not a refusal. When one image's file name says `before` and
another's says `after`, the two show side by side (`class="pair"`) at the top
of `Reference`. The converter is hand-rolled for this subset — headings,
paragraphs, bullet and numbered lists with one nested level, fenced code,
quotes, **bold**, `code`, links, images and bare URLs — and escapes
everything else; a link whose scheme is not http(s), mailto or file is text.
No markdown crate: amont-agent is on a trust path and a page only the person
reads does not clear `change.dependency-bar`.
## What approves
| the person… | result |
|---|---|
| picks `Approve` on the marked question | the listed commits are approved |
| picks `Request changes` or `Hold` | the previews are dropped |
| does not answer (a timeout) | still pending |
| types `approve`, `ship`, `lgtm` or `looks good` as the next prompt, after a marked question was asked | approved |
| types anything else next — including `yes`, `go`, `ok`, `continue` | the previews lapse |
Unmarked questions are ignored, so a release question answered "Approve"
approves no preview, even in the same turn. Another session's answers never
touch this session's previews. Registrations and approvals lapse after a day,
checked whenever they are read.
`AskUserQuestion` accepts `answers` in its input, so a model could pre-answer
its own question. The `PreToolUse` hook records, per `tool_use_id`, whether a
marked question arrived pre-answered; such a question never marks its
previews as asked (so no answer to it can approve), the `PostToolUse` side
checks the same record again, and under `deny` the question is refused before
it runs.
## When the rule speaks
`push-preview` fires on a push only when all of these hold:
- the repository has a user interface: a `dev` script in `package.json` at
the root or in `web/`, or `git config amont.agent.push-preview.ui true`
(`false` opts a repository out);
- a pushed branch carries an **interface change** (below);
- that commit has no approval.
### What counts as an interface change
The repository-level decision above says whether a repository is gated at
all. Within a gated repository, one changed file counts only when all hold:
1. **The path.** It is under `app/`, `src/` or `web/` (at any depth), or it
is a `.tsx`, `.jsx`, `.css` or `.html` file.
2. **The package.** Its nearest `package.json` — walking up from the file
to the repository root, read from the **pushed commit** (`git show
<commit>:<path>`), not the working tree — has a `dev` script, or lists
`react`, `react-dom`, `react-native`, `react-strict-dom` or
`@duro-app/ui` in `dependencies` or as a **required** peer dependency.
`devDependencies` and optional peers (`peerDependenciesMeta.<name>.optional`)
do not count: duro-design-system's `packages/cli` carries `@duro-app/ui`
exactly there, and renders nothing. A monorepo whose root has a `dev`
script is therefore judged package by package. No `package.json` at all
on the way up, or one that does not parse: the path decides.
3. **Not comments only.** For a `.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.jsx` or `.css`
file, the diff (`git diff -U0 <base>..<commit> -- <file>`; on a new
branch with no base, each unpublished commit against its first parent)
is read. When every added and removed line that is not blank is a comment
line — starting with `//`, `/*`, `*`, `*/`, or a JSX `{/* … */}` — the
file does not count. A line with code after a closed comment (`/* a */
foo()`), a `*` line that reads like code (CSS `* {`), a binary file or a
diff that cannot be taken all count. Any doubt counts.
`git config amont.agent.push-preview.ui` still overrides the repository
decision; it does not change how files are judged.
A push to `main` or `master` is left to amont's `branch-protect`.
### Supported push shapes
v1 reads an explicit remote plus explicit refspecs — `git push -u origin
feat/x`, `git push origin HEAD:feat/x`, several refspecs — with `-C <dir>`
and a leading `cd` honoured. A destination under `refs/tags/` is excluded;
one under `refs/heads/` is judged, including a tag's commit pushed onto a
branch.
Everything else is **unresolvable** and journalled with its shape: a bare
`git push`, a remote with no refspec (git's `push.default` would decide),
`--all`, `--mirror`, `--tags`, deletes, glob refspecs, a URL as the remote,
a word from a substitution, an unknown flag. Under `advise` an unresolvable
push passes with a journal note; under `deny` a push to a UI repository is
held — `--all` is not the way around the gate. The shapes the journal
collects decide what the next version reads.
## What `push-published` records
It never speaks. Before a push to a UI repository the hook remembers where
each branch destination stood (keyed by `tool_use_id`); after it, one
`git ls-remote` per destination, and one journal line:
| outcome | meaning |
|---|---|
| `published-approved` | the remote now holds an approved UI commit it did not hold before |
| `published-unapproved` | the same, without an approval — the gap `advise` leaves |
| `published-no-ui` | published, nothing a person could preview |
| `already-present` | the remote held the commit before the push |
| `unverified` | the remote does not hold it, or could not be asked |
## What this is not
A registration is the agent's attestation of worktree, commit and URL, and
its guide is the agent's account of what it checked.
Nothing here proves the browser served that commit or that the person
looked. It covers pushes made through Claude Code, not pushes typed in a
shell, and it is a workflow aid, not a Git enforcement boundary.
## Reading the soak
```sh
grep -E 'push-(preview|published)' ~/.claude/amont-agent/journal.log
```
Every line names the repository the push ran in or the registration
belongs to — never the session's working directory, which may be another
worktree.
The rule's own lines (`registered`, `replaced`, `approved`, `dropped`,
`unanswered`, `expired`, `prefilled`, `unbound`) carry the answer latency on
approvals and drops: `option,184s,dur=0ms`. **The latency is the first
number** (`184s`): the hook's own clock, from the `PreToolUse` of the marked
question to its `PostToolUse`. `dur=` is the payload's raw `duration_ms`,
kept only for comparison — it is not the person's answer time (a
minutes-long approval arrived as `0`). A `-` in place of the seconds means
the question's `PreToolUse` record was written by an older release. A median
under about ten seconds after a week says the approval is a rubber stamp;
ADR-0023 then retires the gate and keeps the verification.