1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
//! A ceiling that outlives the run: what one customer approved, spent across
//! however many runs it takes, until they take it back.
//!
//! A `Budget` bounds one run and a `TenantQuota` bounds a billing period.
//! Neither can hold *this customer approved €500* — so a delegated spend
//! envelope had nowhere to live, and the three properties below are the reason
//! it is an authorization rather than a throttle.
//!
//! Run with:
//! `cargo run --example standing_authority --features redb,testkit`
use std::sync::Arc;
use agentplane::authority::{AuthorityError, AuthorityId, AuthorityStore, StandingAuthority};
use agentplane::core::Spend;
use agentplane::prelude::*;
use serde_json::{Value, json};
/// Spends against a mandate the customer issued, not against this run's budget.
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Purchase;
#[async_trait::async_trait]
impl Skill for Purchase {
fn descriptor(&self) -> SkillDescriptor {
SkillDescriptor::new("purchase").provides("procurement.purchase")
}
async fn invoke(
&self,
cx: &mut StepCtx<'_>,
input: Tainted<Value>,
) -> Result<Outcome, SkillError> {
let cents = input.peek()["cents"].as_u64().unwrap_or(0);
// A journaled effect, because the balance is mutable state outside the
// chain: a skill reading it directly would make a replay depend on what
// the store happens to hold now rather than on what this run saw.
match cx
.draw(&AuthorityId::new("mandate-42"), Spend::money(cents))
.await
{
Ok(drawn) => Ok(Outcome::done(Tainted::trusted(json!({
"charged": cents,
"remaining": drawn.remaining.minor_units,
"draw": drawn.draws,
})))),
// Five distinguishable refusals rather than one message. Which one
// arrived decides what the caller does next, which is the whole
// reason they are not a string.
Err(refused) => Ok(Outcome::done(Tainted::trusted(json!({
"refused": refused.to_string(),
})))),
}
}
}
#[tokio::main(flavor = "current_thread")]
async fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let store = Arc::new(RedbStore::open_in_memory()?);
// Issued once and thereafter immutable: a ceiling somebody agreed to must
// not be editable under them. Changing it means revoking this one and
// issuing another, so both stay on the record.
store
.issue(&StandingAuthority::new(
"mandate-42",
"approval:SET-42",
Spend::money(50_000),
))
.await?;
let journal: Arc<dyn JournalStore> = store.clone();
let authorities: Arc<dyn AuthorityStore> = store.clone();
let runtime = Runtime::builder(journal)
.authorities(authorities)
.skill(Purchase)
.build();
// 1. The ceiling is cumulative across *runs*. Two separate runs, one
// envelope — which is the thing a per-run budget cannot express.
let first = runtime
.run(
"procurement.purchase",
Tainted::trusted(json!({"cents": 30_000})),
)
.await?;
assert_eq!(
first.output.as_ref().unwrap().peek()["remaining"],
json!(20_000)
);
println!("1. issued → mandate-42: 50000 minor units against 'approval:SET-42'");
println!(" first run drew → 30000, remaining 20000");
let second = runtime
.run(
"procurement.purchase",
Tainted::trusted(json!({"cents": 15_000})),
)
.await?;
assert_eq!(
second.output.as_ref().unwrap().peek()["remaining"],
json!(5_000)
);
println!(" second run drew → 15000, remaining 5000 — one envelope across separate runs,");
println!(" which is the thing a per-run budget cannot hold");
// 2. Over the ceiling is `Exhausted`, and a refused draw consumes nothing —
// otherwise a caller probing the remainder would drain it.
let over = runtime
.run(
"procurement.purchase",
Tainted::trusted(json!({"cents": 10_000})),
)
.await?;
let message = over.output.as_ref().unwrap().peek()["refused"]
.as_str()
.unwrap();
assert!(message.contains("does not replenish"), "got: {message}");
println!("\n2. 10000 refused → {message}");
assert_eq!(
store
.state(&AuthorityId::new("mandate-42"))
.await?
.expect("issued")
.remaining(),
Spend::money(5_000),
"a refusal must not consume"
);
println!(
" remaining → still 5000: a refused draw consumes nothing, so probing cannot drain"
);
revocation(&runtime, &store).await?;
Ok(())
}
/// 3–4. Revocation is a different answer from exhaustion, and the terms survive.
///
/// The difference is operational: `Exhausted` may reasonably be followed by
/// asking for less, and against a revoked authority that is a loop.
async fn revocation(
runtime: &Runtime,
store: &Arc<RedbStore>,
) -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
store
.revoke(
&AuthorityId::new("mandate-42"),
"the customer cancelled",
agentplane::core::Timestamp::UNIX_EPOCH,
)
.await?;
let after = runtime
.run(
"procurement.purchase",
Tainted::trusted(json!({"cents": 1_000})),
)
.await?;
let message = after.output.as_ref().unwrap().peek()["refused"]
.as_str()
.unwrap();
assert!(message.contains("was revoked"), "got: {message}");
println!("\n3. after revocation → {message}");
println!(" a different answer from exhaustion: asking for less is pointless now");
// The terms survive revocation. An authority that vanished would take with
// it the record of what the draws already taken were authorized *by*, which
// is the first thing an audit asks for.
let state = store
.state(&AuthorityId::new("mandate-42"))
.await?
.expect("revoked, not deleted");
assert_eq!(state.authority.basis, "approval:SET-42");
assert_eq!(state.draws, 2);
// Refunds are deliberately not expressible: `Spend` is unsigned, so no draw
// can un-spend a ceiling. Restoring headroom means issuing another
// authority, which leaves both decisions on the record.
let err = store
.issue(&StandingAuthority::new(
"mandate-42",
"approval:SET-42",
Spend::money(90_000),
))
.await
.expect_err("an id cannot be redefined under the draws already taken");
assert!(matches!(err, AuthorityError::AlreadyIssued(_)));
println!(
"\n4. the terms survive → {} drawn over {} draws against '{}'; revoked: \"{}\"",
state.drawn.minor_units,
state.draws,
state.authority.basis,
state.revoked.expect("revoked").reason,
);
println!(" and the id cannot be reissued under the draws already taken");
Ok(())
}