workload_spec/validate.rs
1//! Shape validators for [`WorkloadSpec`].
2//!
3//! Called by clients (desktop, agent, CLI) before sending a spec over RPC.
4//! Sync, no I/O. Returns `Ok(warnings)` on pass or `Err(ShapeError)` on the
5//! first hard constraint violation.
6//!
7//! Layers: shape (this file, no I/O) → semantic (yubaba-side, R090-F3) →
8//! environment (deploy-time, R090-F4).
9
10use std::fmt;
11use std::sync::OnceLock;
12
13use regex::Regex;
14use thiserror::Error;
15
16use crate::{
17 EnvValue, EnvVar, ImageRef, LifecycleArchetype, MachineId, MeshIdent, MeshLookup,
18 RestartPolicy, SecretRef, SecretTarget, StaticAssetWorkload, Supply, VolumeSource,
19 WorkloadSpec, DURABILITY_SUBJECTS_ANNOTATION, DURABILITY_TIER_ANNOTATION,
20};
21
22// ── Field paths ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
23
24/// Identifies the field that caused a shape error or warning.
25///
26/// Structured as an enum so promoting to all-errors mode (collecting into
27/// `Vec<FieldError>` instead of returning on the first hit) is mechanical.
28#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
29pub enum FieldPath {
30 Name,
31 MeshIdentity,
32 TailscaleTag,
33 Replicas,
34 ImageTag,
35 Tier,
36 /// `volumes[index].<sub>` — e.g. `Volume(0, "source")`.
37 Volume(usize, &'static str),
38 /// Public port not found in `expose.mesh.ports`.
39 ExposeMeshPort(u16),
40 /// `expose.mesh.ports[index]` — a malformed port declaration (R844-F17):
41 /// an empty entry, a bad name, or a name/number repeated within the list.
42 MeshPort(usize),
43 /// `secrets[index].<sub>` — e.g. `Secret(0, "target.path")`.
44 Secret(usize, &'static str),
45 /// `healthcheck.<sub>`.
46 Healthcheck(&'static str),
47 RestartPolicy,
48 /// `image` — registry says the image/tag is unknown.
49 Image,
50 /// `depends_on[index]` — mesh ident is not a known deployed workload.
51 DependsOn(usize),
52 /// `requires[index]` — a malformed requirement (R860-T1): a `supply` /
53 /// `provides` mismatch, a provider whose spec names a different identity,
54 /// a nested `self` supply, or a repeated / self-naming ident.
55 Requires(usize),
56 /// `expose.public.hostname` — hostname is not in an owned CF zone.
57 Hostname,
58 /// `resources` — machine lacks sufficient capacity.
59 Resources,
60 /// `aliases[key]` — alias target filename is not in the `[[asset]]` catalog.
61 AssetAlias(String),
62 /// `asset[index].<sub>` — e.g. `Asset(0, "source")` for the XOR rule.
63 Asset(usize, &'static str),
64 /// `annotations["<key>"]` — a declaration carried as an annotation rather
65 /// than a field, because `WorkloadSpec` crosses a positional postcard wire
66 /// (R590-B3). `yah.durability.tier` is the first.
67 Annotation(&'static str),
68}
69
70impl fmt::Display for FieldPath {
71 fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
72 match self {
73 FieldPath::Name => write!(f, "name"),
74 FieldPath::MeshIdentity => write!(f, "expose.mesh.identity"),
75 FieldPath::TailscaleTag => write!(f, "expose.operator.tailscale_tag"),
76 FieldPath::Replicas => write!(f, "replicas"),
77 FieldPath::ImageTag => write!(f, "image.tag"),
78 FieldPath::Tier => write!(f, "tier"),
79 FieldPath::Volume(i, sub) => write!(f, "volumes[{i}].{sub}"),
80 FieldPath::ExposeMeshPort(port) => write!(f, "expose.public.port ({port})"),
81 FieldPath::MeshPort(i) => write!(f, "expose.mesh.ports[{i}]"),
82 FieldPath::Secret(i, sub) => write!(f, "secrets[{i}].{sub}"),
83 FieldPath::Healthcheck(sub) => write!(f, "healthcheck.{sub}"),
84 FieldPath::RestartPolicy => write!(f, "restart_policy"),
85 FieldPath::Image => write!(f, "image"),
86 FieldPath::DependsOn(i) => write!(f, "depends_on[{i}]"),
87 FieldPath::Requires(i) => write!(f, "requires[{i}]"),
88 FieldPath::Hostname => write!(f, "expose.public.hostname"),
89 FieldPath::Resources => write!(f, "resources"),
90 FieldPath::AssetAlias(key) => write!(f, "aliases[{key}]"),
91 FieldPath::Asset(i, sub) => write!(f, "asset[{i}].{sub}"),
92 FieldPath::Annotation(key) => write!(f, "annotations[\"{key}\"]"),
93 }
94 }
95}
96
97// ── Hard errors ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
98
99/// A hard constraint violation that makes a spec impossible to deploy.
100///
101/// V1 surfaces the first error found. When the UI needs per-field
102/// highlighting, wrap in `Vec<ShapeError>` and collect instead of returning
103/// early — the `FieldPath` enum is already the common currency.
104#[derive(Debug, Error, PartialEq)]
105pub enum ShapeError {
106 #[error("field {path}: {reason}")]
107 Field { path: FieldPath, reason: String },
108}
109
110// ── Soft warnings ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
111
112/// A soft check that passed but may indicate misconfiguration.
113#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
114pub struct ShapeWarning {
115 pub path: FieldPath,
116 pub message: String,
117}
118
119impl fmt::Display for ShapeWarning {
120 fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
121 write!(f, "warning at {}: {}", self.path, self.message)
122 }
123}
124
125// ── Internal helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
126
127/// V1 known tier values. Unknown tiers produce a warning, not an error
128/// (cluster config may add custom tiers).
129const KNOWN_TIERS: &[&str] = &["public", "tenant", "private", "infra"];
130
131fn dns_label_re() -> &'static Regex {
132 static RE: OnceLock<Regex> = OnceLock::new();
133 RE.get_or_init(|| Regex::new(r"^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$").unwrap())
134}
135
136fn env_name_re() -> &'static Regex {
137 static RE: OnceLock<Regex> = OnceLock::new();
138 RE.get_or_init(|| Regex::new(r"^[A-Z_][A-Z0-9_]*$").unwrap())
139}
140
141/// Validates a single DNS label: `^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$`, ≤ 63 chars.
142fn check_dns_label(value: &str, path: FieldPath) -> Result<(), ShapeError> {
143 if value.len() > 63 {
144 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
145 path,
146 reason: format!("length {} exceeds maximum 63", value.len()),
147 });
148 }
149 if !dns_label_re().is_match(value) {
150 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
151 path,
152 reason: format!(
153 "{:?} must match ^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$",
154 value
155 ),
156 });
157 }
158 Ok(())
159}
160
161/// Validates a dot-separated mesh identity where each segment is a DNS label.
162/// Total length ≤ 63. Example valid value: `"noisetable-api.pdx"`.
163fn check_mesh_ident(value: &str, path: FieldPath) -> Result<(), ShapeError> {
164 if value.len() > 63 {
165 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
166 path,
167 reason: format!("length {} exceeds maximum 63", value.len()),
168 });
169 }
170 for segment in value.split('.') {
171 if !dns_label_re().is_match(segment) {
172 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
173 path,
174 reason: format!(
175 "segment {:?} in {:?} must match ^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$",
176 segment, value
177 ),
178 });
179 }
180 }
181 Ok(())
182}
183
184/// The longest a port name may be. Matches IANA's service-name limit, which is
185/// what Kubernetes uses for the same field and what any tool that has to render
186/// a port name in a fixed column already assumes.
187const MESH_PORT_NAME_MAX: usize = 15;
188
189/// Validates `expose.mesh.ports` (R844-F17): every entry states something, every
190/// name is a DNS label short enough to be a service name, and nothing is
191/// declared twice.
192///
193/// The uniqueness rules are the load-bearing half. A repeated *name* would make
194/// `name -> port` ambiguous at exactly the moment a consumer asks for it —
195/// `ServiceRecord::port("http")` and the `PORT_HTTP` variable both resolve
196/// through that map — and a repeated *number* is a workload asking to bind one
197/// socket twice. Both are caught here rather than at bring-up because the
198/// author can still see the manifest.
199fn check_mesh_ports(
200 mesh: &crate::MeshExpose,
201 warnings: &mut Vec<ShapeWarning>,
202) -> Result<(), ShapeError> {
203 let mut seen_names: Vec<&str> = Vec::new();
204 let mut seen_numbers: Vec<u16> = Vec::new();
205
206 for (i, port) in mesh.ports.iter().enumerate() {
207 let path = FieldPath::MeshPort(i);
208
209 if port.name.is_none() && port.number.is_none() {
210 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
211 path,
212 reason: "declares neither a name nor a number — write a number \
213 (8080), a name (\"http\"), or both \
214 ({ name = \"http\", port = 8080 })"
215 .to_string(),
216 });
217 }
218
219 if let Some(name) = port.name.as_deref() {
220 if name.len() > MESH_PORT_NAME_MAX {
221 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
222 path,
223 reason: format!(
224 "port name {name:?} is {} characters; the maximum is \
225 {MESH_PORT_NAME_MAX}",
226 name.len()
227 ),
228 });
229 }
230 if !dns_label_re().is_match(name) {
231 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
232 path,
233 reason: format!(
234 "port name {name:?} must match \
235 ^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$"
236 ),
237 });
238 }
239 if seen_names.contains(&name) {
240 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
241 path,
242 reason: format!(
243 "port name {name:?} is declared twice; a name is how a \
244 consumer selects one port, so it has to pick out \
245 exactly one"
246 ),
247 });
248 }
249 seen_names.push(name);
250 }
251
252 match port.number {
253 Some(number) => {
254 if seen_numbers.contains(&number) {
255 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
256 path,
257 reason: format!(
258 "port {number} is declared twice; a workload cannot \
259 bind the same port on two listeners"
260 ),
261 });
262 }
263 seen_numbers.push(number);
264 }
265 // Still a warning rather than an error, but R844-F21 changed what
266 // it has to say. A name-only port IS allocated now — on the native
267 // backend, which owns the workload's network namespace: kamaji
268 // picks the number, remembers it per `(ident, name)` across a
269 // restart, and hands it to the process as `PORT_<NAME>`.
270 //
271 // It is still unbindable on a container backend, where the ports
272 // are the image's and both backends refuse the spelling outright
273 // (`kamaji::reject_unresolved_ports`). Shape validation cannot tell
274 // which backend a spec will land on — placement decides that later
275 // — so naming the split is the most this layer can honestly say,
276 // and it is why an error here would be wrong.
277 None => warnings.push(ShapeWarning {
278 path,
279 message: format!(
280 "port {:?} declares no number: the native backend allocates \
281 one and tells the process via PORT_{}, but a container \
282 backend refuses it — a container's ports are its image's. \
283 State the number ({{ name = {:?}, port = <n> }}) if this \
284 workload runs as a container.",
285 port.name.as_deref().unwrap_or_default(),
286 port.name
287 .as_deref()
288 .unwrap_or_default()
289 .to_uppercase()
290 .replace(|c: char| !c.is_ascii_alphanumeric(), "_"),
291 port.name.as_deref().unwrap_or_default(),
292 ),
293 }),
294 }
295 }
296
297 Ok(())
298}
299
300/// Validates `requires` (R860-T1 / W338): the `supply` / `provides` pairing,
301/// the identity a self-provisioned provider claims, the depth bound on the
302/// recursion, and ident uniqueness.
303///
304/// The depth bound is the load-bearing rule. `Requirement::provides` makes
305/// `WorkloadSpec` recursive, and a provider that may itself self-provision
306/// turns "a workload plus its sidecars" into an unbounded tree that placement
307/// would have to flatten before it could schedule anything. One level is what
308/// the design asks for, so one level is what is representable.
309fn check_requires(spec: &WorkloadSpec) -> Result<(), ShapeError> {
310 let mut seen: Vec<&str> = Vec::new();
311
312 for (i, req) in spec.requires.iter().enumerate() {
313 let path = || FieldPath::Requires(i);
314 let ident = req.ident.0.as_str();
315
316 if ident == spec.expose.mesh.identity.0 {
317 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
318 path: path(),
319 reason: format!(
320 "requires its own identity {ident:?}; a workload cannot be \
321 its own provider"
322 ),
323 });
324 }
325 if seen.contains(&ident) {
326 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
327 path: path(),
328 reason: format!(
329 "ident {ident:?} is declared twice; one requirement per \
330 provider, since a second entry could only contradict the \
331 first's locality or supply"
332 ),
333 });
334 }
335 seen.push(ident);
336
337 match (req.supply, &req.provides) {
338 (Supply::SelfProvision, None) => {
339 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
340 path: path(),
341 reason: format!(
342 "supply = \"self\" on {ident:?} but no `provides` spec; \
343 a self-provisioned requirement is the one that carries \
344 its provider, so there is nothing to stand up"
345 ),
346 });
347 }
348 (Supply::Wait, Some(_)) => {
349 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
350 path: path(),
351 reason: format!(
352 "supply = \"wait\" on {ident:?} but a `provides` spec is \
353 present; a waiting requirement names a provider someone \
354 else declares, so this spec would have no owner — set \
355 supply = \"self\" to deploy it here"
356 ),
357 });
358 }
359 (Supply::Wait, None) => {}
360 (Supply::SelfProvision, Some(provided)) => {
361 if provided.expose.mesh.identity.0 != ident {
362 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
363 path: path(),
364 reason: format!(
365 "`provides` declares expose.mesh.identity {:?} but the \
366 requirement names {ident:?}; the provider keeps its \
367 own mesh identity and it has to be the one this \
368 requirement asks for (its `name` is {:?})",
369 provided.expose.mesh.identity.0, provided.name
370 ),
371 });
372 }
373 if let Some(nested) = provided
374 .requires
375 .iter()
376 .find(|r| matches!(r.supply, Supply::SelfProvision))
377 {
378 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
379 path: path(),
380 reason: format!(
381 "`provides` spec {ident:?} itself requires {:?} with \
382 supply = \"self\"; composition is bounded at one \
383 level, so a provider may only wait on things it \
384 does not deploy — hoist that requirement up to this \
385 spec's own `requires`",
386 nested.ident.0
387 ),
388 });
389 }
390 }
391 }
392 }
393
394 Ok(())
395}
396
397// ── Public API ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
398
399/// Run shape validation — sync, no I/O.
400///
401/// Returns `Ok(warnings)` when all hard constraints pass; the `Vec` is empty
402/// for a clean spec. Returns `Err` on the first hard constraint violation.
403/// Callers that only need hard errors can discard the Ok value with
404/// `.map(|_| ())`.
405///
406/// Hard constraints checked:
407/// - `name`, `expose.mesh.identity`: DNS-label format, ≤ 63 chars.
408/// - `expose.operator.tailscale_tag`: `"tag:<dns-label>"`, ≤ 63 chars.
409/// - `replicas`: 0–100.
410/// - `image.tag`: non-empty when `digest` is `None`.
411/// - `volumes[*].source = Bind`: only allowed when `tier = "infra"`.
412/// - `expose.mesh.ports[*]`: each entry states a name and/or a number; names are
413/// DNS labels ≤ 15 chars; no name and no number is declared twice (R844-F17).
414/// - `expose.public.port`: must appear in `expose.mesh.ports`.
415/// - `secrets[*].target`: file paths must be absolute; env-var names must
416/// match `^[A-Z_][A-Z0-9_]*$`.
417/// - `requires[*]`: `supply = "self"` carries a `provides` spec and
418/// `supply = "wait"` does not; a `provides` spec declares the identity its
419/// requirement names; a `provides` spec carries no `self` supply of its own
420/// (depth 1); idents are unique and none is the spec's own (R860-T1).
421///
422/// Soft checks (produce warnings, not errors):
423/// - `expose.mesh.ports[*]`: a name with no number — nothing allocates from the
424/// manifest yet, so nothing binds it (R844-F17).
425/// - Unknown tier value.
426/// - `RestartPolicy::Never` without `annotations["yah.forge"] = "true"`.
427/// - `healthcheck.initial_delay < stop_policy.grace_period * 2`.
428pub fn shape(spec: &WorkloadSpec) -> Result<Vec<ShapeWarning>, ShapeError> {
429 let mut warnings: Vec<ShapeWarning> = Vec::new();
430
431 // name: single DNS label, ≤ 63 chars
432 check_dns_label(&spec.name, FieldPath::Name)?;
433
434 // expose.mesh.identity: dot-separated DNS name, ≤ 63 total
435 check_mesh_ident(&spec.expose.mesh.identity.0, FieldPath::MeshIdentity)?;
436
437 // expose.operator.tailscale_tag: "tag:<dns-label>", ≤ 63 chars (optional)
438 if let Some(op) = &spec.expose.operator {
439 let tag = &op.tailscale_tag;
440 if tag.len() > 63 {
441 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
442 path: FieldPath::TailscaleTag,
443 reason: format!("length {} exceeds maximum 63", tag.len()),
444 });
445 }
446 let rest = tag.strip_prefix("tag:").ok_or_else(|| ShapeError::Field {
447 path: FieldPath::TailscaleTag,
448 reason: format!("{:?} must start with \"tag:\"", tag),
449 })?;
450 if !dns_label_re().is_match(rest) {
451 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
452 path: FieldPath::TailscaleTag,
453 reason: format!(
454 "the part after \"tag:\" in {:?} must match \
455 ^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?$",
456 tag
457 ),
458 });
459 }
460 }
461
462 // replicas: 0..=100
463 if spec.replicas > 100 {
464 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
465 path: FieldPath::Replicas,
466 reason: format!("{} exceeds maximum 100", spec.replicas),
467 });
468 }
469
470 // image.tag: non-empty (informational identifier; digest is the source of
471 // truth and is structurally required at the type level).
472 if spec.image.tag.is_empty() {
473 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
474 path: FieldPath::ImageTag,
475 reason: "tag is empty; provide a human-readable tag alongside the digest".into(),
476 });
477 }
478
479 // tier: warn on unknown (cluster config may add custom tiers)
480 if !KNOWN_TIERS.contains(&spec.tier.0.as_str()) {
481 warnings.push(ShapeWarning {
482 path: FieldPath::Tier,
483 message: format!(
484 "\"{}\" is not in the known tier set (public/tenant/private/infra); \
485 yubaba may reject it if the cluster config does not include this tier",
486 spec.tier.0
487 ),
488 });
489 }
490
491 // volumes[*]: Bind rejected unless tier = "infra"
492 for (i, vol) in spec.volumes.iter().enumerate() {
493 if matches!(&vol.source, VolumeSource::Bind { .. }) && spec.tier.0 != "infra" {
494 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
495 path: FieldPath::Volume(i, "source"),
496 reason: format!(
497 "Bind mounts are only allowed when tier = \"infra\" \
498 (current tier: {:?})",
499 spec.tier.0
500 ),
501 });
502 }
503 }
504
505 // expose.mesh.ports[*]: names well-formed, nothing declared twice (R844-F17)
506 check_mesh_ports(&spec.expose.mesh, &mut warnings)?;
507
508 // requires[*]: supply/provides pairing, provider identity, depth bound,
509 // ident uniqueness (R860-T1)
510 check_requires(spec)?;
511
512 // expose.public.port must appear in expose.mesh.ports
513 if let Some(public) = &spec.expose.public {
514 if !spec.expose.mesh.declares_number(public.port) {
515 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
516 path: FieldPath::ExposeMeshPort(public.port),
517 reason: format!(
518 "port {} must appear in expose.mesh.ports {:?} \
519 before it can be exposed publicly",
520 public.port,
521 spec.expose.mesh.numbers()
522 ),
523 });
524 }
525 }
526
527 // secrets[*]: target paths absolute; env-var names valid identifiers
528 for (i, secret) in spec.secrets.iter().enumerate() {
529 match &secret.target {
530 SecretTarget::File { path, .. } => {
531 if !path.is_absolute() {
532 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
533 path: FieldPath::Secret(i, "target.path"),
534 reason: format!("{:?} is not an absolute path", path),
535 });
536 }
537 }
538 SecretTarget::EnvVar { name } => {
539 if !env_name_re().is_match(name) {
540 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
541 path: FieldPath::Secret(i, "target.name"),
542 reason: format!(
543 "{:?} is not a valid env-var identifier (^[A-Z_][A-Z0-9_]*$)",
544 name
545 ),
546 });
547 }
548 }
549 }
550 }
551
552 // soft: RestartPolicy::Never without yah.forge=true annotation
553 if matches!(spec.restart_policy, RestartPolicy::Never) {
554 let is_forge = spec
555 .annotations
556 .get("yah.forge")
557 .map(|v| v == "true")
558 .unwrap_or(false);
559 if !is_forge {
560 warnings.push(ShapeWarning {
561 path: FieldPath::RestartPolicy,
562 message: "restart_policy=Never is intended for forge runs; \
563 add annotation yah.forge=true to suppress this warning"
564 .into(),
565 });
566 }
567 }
568
569 // yah.durability.*: a malformed declaration is hard, and a stateful
570 // workload with no declaration at all is soft (R850-P4).
571 //
572 // The asymmetry is deliberate. Refusing every undeclared appliance would
573 // fail every spec in the tree on the day the annotation shipped; reading a
574 // *malformed* one as "undeclared" would let `tier = "streem"` mean "no
575 // backups" silently, which is the failure this whole surface exists to
576 // stop. See `WorkloadSpec::durability`.
577 let durability = spec
578 .durability()
579 .map_err(|e| ShapeError::Field {
580 path: FieldPath::Annotation(DURABILITY_TIER_ANNOTATION),
581 reason: e.to_string(),
582 })?;
583 // R850-F1: a bytes-shipping tier's subjects are volume-relative, so there
584 // has to be exactly one volume for them to be relative *to*. Zero means the
585 // declaration names files that will never exist; two or more means the
586 // hydrate helper would have to guess which host directory to restore into,
587 // and a wrong guess writes somebody's database over somebody else's.
588 if let Some(d) = durability.as_ref().filter(|d| d.tier.ships_bytes()) {
589 let named: Vec<&str> = spec
590 .volumes
591 .iter()
592 .filter_map(|v| match &v.source {
593 VolumeSource::Named { name } => Some(name.as_str()),
594 _ => None,
595 })
596 .collect();
597 if named.len() != 1 {
598 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
599 path: FieldPath::Annotation(DURABILITY_SUBJECTS_ANNOTATION),
600 reason: format!(
601 "{DURABILITY_TIER_ANNOTATION} = \"{}\" declares subjects {:?}, which are \
602 relative to a named volume, but this spec declares {} named volumes{}; \
603 a tier that ships bytes needs exactly one",
604 d.tier,
605 d.subjects,
606 named.len(),
607 if named.is_empty() {
608 String::new()
609 } else {
610 format!(" ({})", named.join(", "))
611 }
612 ),
613 });
614 }
615 }
616
617 if durability.is_none()
618 && spec.effective_archetype() == LifecycleArchetype::Appliance
619 && spec
620 .volumes
621 .iter()
622 .any(|v| matches!(v.source, VolumeSource::Named { .. }))
623 {
624 warnings.push(ShapeWarning {
625 path: FieldPath::Annotation(DURABILITY_TIER_ANNOTATION),
626 message: format!(
627 "appliance with a yubaba-managed named volume declares no durability \
628 tier, so that volume is the only copy of its state and losing the node \
629 loses it; declare {DURABILITY_TIER_ANNOTATION} = \"none\" if that is \
630 intended, or a real tier if it is not"
631 ),
632 });
633 }
634
635 // soft: healthcheck.initial_delay >= stop_policy.grace_period * 2
636 if let Some(hc) = &spec.healthcheck {
637 let min_recommended = spec.stop_policy.grace_period.as_ms().saturating_mul(2);
638 if hc.initial_delay.as_ms() < min_recommended {
639 warnings.push(ShapeWarning {
640 path: FieldPath::Healthcheck("initial_delay"),
641 message: format!(
642 "initial_delay ({}ms) is less than stop_policy.grace_period * 2 ({}ms); \
643 a SIGTERM during startup may catch a still-initialising container",
644 hc.initial_delay.as_ms(),
645 min_recommended
646 ),
647 });
648 }
649 }
650
651 Ok(warnings)
652}
653
654// ── StaticAsset validator ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
655
656/// Shape-validate a `kind = "static-asset"` workload.
657///
658/// Enforces the closed-catalog invariant: every value in `[aliases]` must be a
659/// `filename` present in `[[asset]]`. A mirror's `[asset_aliases]` overrides
660/// are bound by the same rule and are validated separately at sync time when
661/// both the workload and mirror are loaded together.
662pub fn shape_static_asset(workload: &StaticAssetWorkload) -> Result<(), ShapeError> {
663 // XOR rule (W164 / R438-T2): every [[asset]] row must set exactly one of
664 // `source` (legacy local bytes) or `derive` (fetch + optional transform).
665 // Both-set is ambiguous (which one wins?); neither-set leaves the
666 // reconciler with no bytes to upload.
667 for (i, entry) in workload.assets.iter().enumerate() {
668 match (entry.source.is_some(), entry.derive.is_some()) {
669 (true, true) => {
670 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
671 path: FieldPath::Asset(i, "source"),
672 reason: format!(
673 "asset {:?}: both `source` and `derive` are set; pick exactly one",
674 entry.filename
675 ),
676 });
677 }
678 (false, false) => {
679 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
680 path: FieldPath::Asset(i, "source"),
681 reason: format!(
682 "asset {:?}: neither `source` nor `derive` is set; pick exactly one",
683 entry.filename
684 ),
685 });
686 }
687 _ => {}
688 }
689 }
690
691 let filenames: std::collections::HashSet<&str> =
692 workload.assets.iter().map(|a| a.filename.as_str()).collect();
693
694 for (alias_key, alias_target) in &workload.aliases {
695 if !filenames.contains(alias_target.as_str()) {
696 return Err(ShapeError::Field {
697 path: FieldPath::AssetAlias(alias_key.clone()),
698 reason: format!(
699 "alias target {:?} is not present in the [[asset]] catalog; \
700 add a matching [[asset]] row or correct the filename",
701 alias_target
702 ),
703 });
704 }
705 }
706
707 Ok(())
708}
709
710// ── Semantic layer ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
711
712/// Transient error from a [`ValidationContext`] lookup.
713///
714/// Distinct from a semantic "resource not found" failure. `ContextError` means
715/// the lookup itself could not complete (network timeout, auth failure, etc.),
716/// not that the resource is definitively absent.
717#[derive(Debug, Error, Clone, PartialEq)]
718#[error("context lookup failed: {0}")]
719pub struct ContextError(pub String);
720
721/// A semantic constraint violation: the spec references a resource that is not
722/// known to the cluster at validation time.
723#[derive(Debug, Error, PartialEq)]
724pub enum SemanticError {
725 #[error("field {path}: {reason}")]
726 Unknown { path: FieldPath, reason: String },
727}
728
729/// Top-level validation error spanning both shape and semantic layers.
730///
731/// `Shape` always wins: if the spec is structurally invalid, semantic checks
732/// never run.
733#[derive(Debug, Error, PartialEq)]
734pub enum WorkloadValidationError {
735 /// Hard shape constraint failed — spec is structurally invalid.
736 #[error("shape: {0}")]
737 Shape(ShapeError),
738
739 /// Semantic check failed — spec references an unknown cluster resource.
740 #[error("semantic: {0}")]
741 Semantic(SemanticError),
742
743 /// Transient ValidationContext lookup failure — the check itself failed.
744 #[error("context: {0}")]
745 Context(ContextError),
746}
747
748impl From<ShapeError> for WorkloadValidationError {
749 fn from(e: ShapeError) -> Self { WorkloadValidationError::Shape(e) }
750}
751
752impl From<ContextError> for WorkloadValidationError {
753 fn from(e: ContextError) -> Self { WorkloadValidationError::Context(e) }
754}
755
756/// Read-only view of yubaba state used for semantic validation.
757///
758/// Defined here so clients (desktop, CLI, agents) can run semantic checks
759/// without depending on the yubaba crate. Yubaba implements this trait.
760///
761/// Each method returns `Result<bool, ContextError>` so transient failures are
762/// distinguishable from definitive "not found" answers.
763pub trait ValidationContext {
764 /// True when the registry confirms the image exists.
765 fn image_exists(&self, image: &ImageRef) -> Result<bool, ContextError>;
766
767 /// True when the named secret exists in the yubaba secret store.
768 fn secret_exists(&self, secret: &SecretRef) -> Result<bool, ContextError>;
769
770 /// True when `ident` is a known deployed workload OR appears in `batch`
771 /// (the set of specs co-deployed in the same request — allows forward
772 /// references within a single deployment batch).
773 fn mesh_ident_known(&self, ident: &MeshIdent, batch: &[MeshIdent]) -> Result<bool, ContextError>;
774
775 /// True when `hostname` falls under a Cloudflare zone owned by this cluster.
776 fn cf_zone_owned(&self, hostname: &str) -> Result<bool, ContextError>;
777
778 /// True when `tag` (e.g. `"tag:noisetable-ops"`) is in the cluster's
779 /// Tailscale ACL tag list.
780 fn tailscale_tag_known(&self, tag: &str) -> Result<bool, ContextError>;
781
782 /// True when `machine_id` has sufficient remaining capacity to host the
783 /// given spec's resource requirements.
784 ///
785 /// Implementors: read memory via [`WorkloadSpec::memory_request_mb`], not
786 /// `spec.resources.memory_mb`. The latter is a cgroup ceiling, and using
787 /// it as a capacity floor is what made every build-worker smaller than
788 /// `for_forge`'s 32 GiB ceiling unschedulable in `admit_workload`. Only a
789 /// test implementation of this trait exists today, so the bug is not live
790 /// here — this note is to keep it from arriving with the first real one.
791 fn capacity_for(&self, spec: &WorkloadSpec, machine_id: &MachineId) -> Result<bool, ContextError>;
792}
793
794/// Run semantic validation — requires yubaba state via [`ValidationContext`].
795///
796/// Shape validation is NOT run here. Callers MUST run [`shape`] first; use
797/// [`all`] to enforce this automatically.
798///
799/// `machine_id` is the target machine for admission-control capacity checks.
800/// `batch` is the set of mesh idents being co-deployed (pass `&[]` for
801/// single-spec deployment); these count as "known" for `depends_on` resolution.
802pub fn semantic(
803 spec: &WorkloadSpec,
804 ctx: &dyn ValidationContext,
805 machine_id: &MachineId,
806 batch: &[MeshIdent],
807) -> Result<(), WorkloadValidationError> {
808 if !ctx.image_exists(&spec.image)? {
809 return Err(WorkloadValidationError::Semantic(SemanticError::Unknown {
810 path: FieldPath::Image,
811 reason: format!(
812 "image {}/{}:{} not found in registry",
813 spec.image.registry, spec.image.repository, spec.image.tag
814 ),
815 }));
816 }
817
818 for (i, secret) in spec.secrets.iter().enumerate() {
819 if !ctx.secret_exists(&secret.source)? {
820 return Err(WorkloadValidationError::Semantic(SemanticError::Unknown {
821 path: FieldPath::Secret(i, "source"),
822 reason: format!("secret source at index {i} not found in yubaba secret store"),
823 }));
824 }
825 }
826
827 for (i, dep) in spec.depends_on.iter().enumerate() {
828 if !ctx.mesh_ident_known(dep, batch)? {
829 return Err(WorkloadValidationError::Semantic(SemanticError::Unknown {
830 path: FieldPath::DependsOn(i),
831 reason: format!("mesh ident {:?} is not a known deployed workload", dep.0),
832 }));
833 }
834 }
835
836 if let Some(public) = &spec.expose.public {
837 if !ctx.cf_zone_owned(&public.hostname)? {
838 return Err(WorkloadValidationError::Semantic(SemanticError::Unknown {
839 path: FieldPath::Hostname,
840 reason: format!(
841 "hostname {:?} is not under a Cloudflare zone owned by this cluster",
842 public.hostname
843 ),
844 }));
845 }
846 }
847
848 if let Some(op) = &spec.expose.operator {
849 if !ctx.tailscale_tag_known(&op.tailscale_tag)? {
850 return Err(WorkloadValidationError::Semantic(SemanticError::Unknown {
851 path: FieldPath::TailscaleTag,
852 reason: format!(
853 "tailscale tag {:?} is not in the cluster's ACL tag list",
854 op.tailscale_tag
855 ),
856 }));
857 }
858 }
859
860 if !ctx.capacity_for(spec, machine_id)? {
861 return Err(WorkloadValidationError::Semantic(SemanticError::Unknown {
862 path: FieldPath::Resources,
863 reason: format!(
864 "machine {:?} lacks capacity (memory={}MB cpu_millis={} ephemeral={}MB)",
865 machine_id.0,
866 spec.resources.memory_mb,
867 spec.resources.cpu_millis,
868 spec.resources.ephemeral_storage_mb
869 ),
870 }));
871 }
872
873 Ok(())
874}
875
876// ── Mesh resolution layer ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
877
878/// Failure surface for [`MeshResolver`] lookups.
879///
880/// `NotDeployed` means the dependency hasn't been observed in mesh state yet
881/// (yubaba's deploy step waits on this — see [`crate::EnvValue::FromMesh`]).
882/// `NoPorts` means the dependency is deployed but its `MeshExpose.ports`
883/// list is empty, so a port-based lookup can't render a value. `Lookup`
884/// covers transient failures from the underlying state read.
885#[derive(Debug, Error, Clone, PartialEq)]
886pub enum MeshError {
887 #[error("mesh ident {ident:?} is not yet deployed")]
888 NotDeployed { ident: String },
889
890 #[error(
891 "mesh ident {ident:?} exposes no ports; {lookup:?} requires at least one"
892 )]
893 NoPorts { ident: String, lookup: MeshLookup },
894
895 /// The peer exposes several ports and the lookup did not say which
896 /// (R844-B22). Deliberately an error rather than a pick — see
897 /// [`MeshLookup`]'s docs.
898 #[error(
899 "mesh ident {ident:?} exposes {} ports ({}) and none is named \"http\", \
900 so {lookup:?} cannot say which one to use. Name the port in the \
901 lookup (kind = \"port_named\", name = \"…\"), or name one of the \
902 peer's ports \"http\" in its expose.mesh.ports.",
903 .names.len(),
904 .names.join(", ")
905 )]
906 AmbiguousPort {
907 ident: String,
908 lookup: MeshLookup,
909 names: Vec<String>,
910 },
911
912 /// The lookup named a port the peer does not expose (R844-B22).
913 #[error(
914 "mesh ident {ident:?} exposes no port named {name:?}; it has {}",
915 if .available.is_empty() { "none".to_string() } else { .available.join(", ") }
916 )]
917 NoSuchPort {
918 ident: String,
919 name: String,
920 available: Vec<String>,
921 },
922
923 #[error("mesh state lookup failed: {0}")]
924 Lookup(String),
925}
926
927/// The port name a peer's sole/default listener carries. Agrees with
928/// `kamaji::DEFAULT_PORT_NAME` by convention rather than by import: kamaji sits
929/// *above* workload-spec in the publish DAG (`yah-base <- {qed,kamaji} <-
930/// yubaba`), so depending on it here would invert the graph. The two are pinned
931/// together by `default_port_name_agrees_with_the_supervisor` in this file's
932/// tests.
933pub const DEFAULT_PORT_NAME: &str = "http";
934
935/// Pick the port a [`MeshLookup`] refers to out of a peer's `name -> port` map
936/// (R844-B22) — the one place the rule lives, so every resolver answers the
937/// same way.
938///
939/// - A **named** lookup takes that port, or errors naming what the peer does
940/// have. No fallback: a lookup that asked for `wss` and silently got `http`
941/// would be the positional guess wearing a name.
942/// - An **unnamed** lookup takes the sole port when there is one, else the port
943/// named [`DEFAULT_PORT_NAME`], else errors. It never takes "the first",
944/// which is what this function exists to stop.
945pub fn select_mesh_port(
946 ident: &str,
947 ports: &std::collections::BTreeMap<String, u16>,
948 lookup: &MeshLookup,
949) -> Result<u16, MeshError> {
950 if let Some(name) = lookup.port_name() {
951 return ports.get(name).copied().ok_or_else(|| MeshError::NoSuchPort {
952 ident: ident.to_string(),
953 name: name.to_string(),
954 available: ports.keys().cloned().collect(),
955 });
956 }
957
958 let mut entries = ports.iter();
959 match (entries.next(), entries.next()) {
960 (None, _) => Err(MeshError::NoPorts {
961 ident: ident.to_string(),
962 lookup: lookup.clone(),
963 }),
964 (Some((_, &only)), None) => Ok(only),
965 _ => ports
966 .get(DEFAULT_PORT_NAME)
967 .copied()
968 .ok_or_else(|| MeshError::AmbiguousPort {
969 ident: ident.to_string(),
970 lookup: lookup.clone(),
971 names: ports.keys().cloned().collect(),
972 }),
973 }
974}
975
976/// Resolve [`crate::EnvValue::FromMesh`] references to literal env values.
977///
978/// Defined in workload-spec so clients (agents, desktop, CLI) can render
979/// specs against fake mesh state without depending on the yubaba crate.
980/// Yubaba's production implementation (in `yubaba::deploy::mesh_resolve`)
981/// reads from raft state.
982///
983/// **Resolution rules** (R844-B22 replaced the positional ones):
984/// - [`MeshLookup::Host`] — the bare DNS-ish identifier as authored (e.g.
985/// `"noisetable-db.pdx"`). Needs no port and resolves for a portless peer.
986/// - [`MeshLookup::Url`] — `"http://<ident>:<port>"`.
987/// - [`MeshLookup::Port`] — that port stringified, e.g. `"5432"`.
988/// - [`MeshLookup::UrlNamed`] / [`MeshLookup::PortNamed`] — the same, at the
989/// peer's port of that name.
990///
991/// **Which port** is [`select_mesh_port`]'s decision, and implementations must
992/// route through it rather than re-deriving: a sole port, else the one named
993/// [`DEFAULT_PORT_NAME`], else an error. It is emphatically *not* "the first
994/// entry", which is what this trait's doc used to promise — declaration order
995/// is not a statement about which listener a dependent should dial, and acting
996/// as if it were is how a workload gets handed a metrics port as its API URL.
997///
998/// Because the rule is name-based rather than positional, a `Url` and a `Port`
999/// resolved in the same deploy agree by construction; the old doc had to ask
1000/// implementations to make the lookup atomic to get that.
1001pub trait MeshResolver {
1002 fn resolve(&self, ident: &MeshIdent, kind: MeshLookup) -> Result<String, MeshError>;
1003}
1004
1005/// Render every [`EnvValue::FromMesh`] entry in `env` to a [`EnvValue::Literal`]
1006/// using `resolver`; pass through `Literal` and `FromSecret` values unchanged.
1007///
1008/// Returns the first resolution error encountered. Callers should run this
1009/// after yubaba's stage-3 mesh peering completes (see
1010/// `yubaba::deploy::env_validate::run` doc), at containerd-spec assembly.
1011///
1012/// `FromSecret` values are deliberately untouched here — secret resolution
1013/// is the secrets layer's job (R090-F5), not the mesh resolver's.
1014///
1015/// @yah:ticket(R844-B22, "MeshLookup::Url and ::Port resolve "the first entry in expose.mesh.ports" — the positional guess this relay abolishes, in the env-injection path")
1016/// @yah:status(review)
1017/// @yah:at(2026-09-04T14:10:34Z)
1018/// @yah:assignee(agent:bundle-anthropic-ashguard)
1019/// @yah:parent(R844)
1020/// @yah:severity(medium)
1021/// @yah:gotcha("THE CLAIM IS IN THE TRAIT'S OWN DOC, so this is confirmed rather than inferred. `MeshResolver` (oss/yah-base/crates/workload-spec/src/validate.rs, \\\"Resolution rules\\\") states: `MeshLookup::Url` resolves to `\\\"http://<ident>:<port>\\\"` where port is \\\"the first entry in the referenced workload's `MeshExpose.ports`\\\", and `MeshLookup::Port` is \\\"the first port stringified\\\". That is precisely the index-guess `kamaji::name_anonymous_ports` refuses to make and that R844-F15's `ServiceRecordFanout::port_for` was rewritten to stop making — an ingress rule resolved off declaration order can publish a hostname at a metrics listener, and this path can hand a DEPENDENT WORKLOAD the same wrong number in its environment. Nothing has hit it because no fronted or depended-on workload declares two ports yet; that is the same reason F15 gave for the passway gap it left, and it stops being true the moment someone uses R844-F17's new spelling.")
1022/// @yah:next("THIS IS NOW FIXABLE, WHICH IS WHY IT IS FILED — before R844-F17 a manifest could not name a port, so \\\"first\\\" was the only selector available and the doc was describing a limitation rather than a bug. `MeshExpose::named_numbers()` and `kamaji::declared_port_names()` now give a name-keyed answer.")
1023/// @yah:next("SHAPE: add a named variant to `MeshLookup` (e.g. `Port { name: String }` / `Url { name: String }`) and make the unnamed forms resolve through the `http` rule instead of index 0 — i.e. one port resolves as today, several resolve to `http` if one is named that, and NONE otherwise. Returning an error when several ports are unnamed is the whole point: it sends the author to the manifest rather than handing a dependent a plausible wrong number. MIND THE WIRE: `MeshLookup` rides `EnvValue::FromMesh` inside `WorkloadSpec`, which crosses the postcard kamaji UDS — see the V6/V7 stanza in oss/kamaji/crates/kamaji-proto/src/version.rs. Adding a field to an existing variant is a bump; appending a whole new variant is not.")
1024/// @yah:handoff("FIXED — the positional guess is gone from the env-injection path. `MeshLookup` gained `UrlNamed { name }` / `PortNamed { name }`, APPENDED rather than added as fields on `Url`/`Port` exactly as the ticket instructed, so every existing postcard encoding stays byte-identical (an enum is encoded by variant index) and NO ProtocolVersion bump was needed — verified by the kamaji-proto codec suite passing untouched. The unnamed forms no longer mean \"index 0\": they resolve through `workload_spec::validate::select_mesh_port`, which takes the sole port when there is one, else the port named `http`, else RETURNS AN ERROR. `MeshLookup` also lost `Copy` (it now owns a String); the one call site that relied on it is `resolve_env_from_mesh`, now cloning.")
1025/// @yah:handoff("THE RULE LIVES IN ONE PLACE, which is the actual repair — the bug was not that a rule was wrong, it was that the rule was RE-DERIVED at every site, so all of them agreed about something false. `select_mesh_port(ident, &BTreeMap<String,u16>, &MeshLookup)` in workload-spec is now the only implementation; yubaba `StateMeshResolver` calls it, the workload-spec test fake calls it (it had been carrying its OWN copy of \"the first entry\", which is why the test suite confirmed the bug rather than catching it), and the `MeshResolver` trait doc now REQUIRES implementations to route through it instead of describing the rule for them to copy. A named lookup deliberately does NOT fall back to `http`: that would be the positional guess wearing a name.")
1026/// @yah:handoff("REQUIRED A TYPE CHANGE THE TICKET DID NOT NAME, and it is where the names were actually being lost: `yubaba::deploy::mesh_resolve::MeshAddress.ports` was a `Vec<u16>`. A bare number list CANNOT answer \"which of these is the API port\", so positional resolution was not a shortcut in that file — it was the only thing the type permitted, and the trait doc had written that limitation down as a rule. It is now the same `BTreeMap<String,u16>` that `kamaji::WorkloadState::ports` and `ServiceRecord::resolved_ports` already carry, so a name survives from manifest to dependent environment. Cheap to change: `MeshAddress` is constructed in exactly one file and only by tests.")
1027/// @yah:handoff("ONE CROSS-CRATE CONSTANT, pinned rather than duplicated silently. `select_mesh_port` needs the default port name and CANNOT import `kamaji::DEFAULT_PORT_NAME` — kamaji sits above workload-spec in the publish DAG (`yah-base <- {qed,kamaji} <- yubaba`), so the dep would invert the graph. So `workload_spec::validate::DEFAULT_PORT_NAME` states it, and `kamaji::tests::default_port_name_agrees_with_the_mesh_resolver` asserts all three spellings (kamaji DEFAULT_PORT_NAME, ports::HTTP, the validate const) are one string. Without that pin a future rename would make a dependent `FromMesh` URL and its own `PORT` env disagree about which listener is the default, silently.")
1028/// @yah:verify("cargo test --manifest-path oss/yah-base/Cargo.toml -p yah-workload-spec = 146/0 + 94/0 (87 before, so +7). The behaviour change is pinned by name: `several_unnamed_ports_is_an_error_not_the_first_one` (the case that previously rendered 5432 out of [5432,9100] and had a test LOCKING THAT IN), `several_ports_resolve_through_http_when_one_is_named_that`, `a_named_lookup_selects_that_port_and_nothing_else`, `a_named_lookup_for_an_absent_port_errors_rather_than_falling_back`, `a_sole_port_resolves_whatever_it_is_called` (sole beats the http rule on purpose — no ambiguity exists with one listener), `an_empty_port_map_is_no_ports_not_ambiguous`, `host_resolves_for_a_portless_peer`.")
1029/// @yah:verify("cargo test --manifest-path oss/yubaba/Cargo.toml -p yubaba --lib = 634 passed / 0 failed (632 before). Two new cases run the PRODUCTION resolver, not the fake: `several_unnamed_ports_error_rather_than_resolving_to_the_first` and `a_named_lookup_selects_that_port_through_the_state_resolver`. THREE PRE-EXISTING TESTS ASSERTED THE BUG and were rewritten rather than worked around — `url_renders_first_port_with_http_prefix` / `port_renders_first_port_as_string` (both crates) took a two-port peer and asserted the first one came back; their fixtures are now single-port and the multi-port case is its own explicitly-named test.")
1030/// @yah:verify("WHOLE-TREE on a settled tree: cargo test --manifest-path oss/kamaji/Cargo.toml --workspace --all-features = every target ok (kamaji lib 185/0, kamaji-bin 278/0, kamaji-proto codec suite untouched and green — the no-wire-bump evidence); yah-cloud --lib 1019/0/4 ignored; yah-local-driver --lib 99/0; cargo test -p yah --lib 1364 passed / 0 failed / 1 ignored; cargo check --workspace --all-targets = ZERO errors. R844 PURITY CANARY HELD: cargo test -p xtask --test main mirror_ingress = 11 passed / 0 failed.")
1031/// @yah:gotcha("MEASURED SCOPE, so nobody over- or under-reads this fix: THE FromMesh ENV PATH HAS NO PRODUCTION CALLER TODAY. `resolve_env_from_mesh` is called only from workload-spec own tests; `StateMeshResolver` is constructed only in its own module tests; and kamaji-bin `resolve_env` (native.rs:208) REFUSES an unresolved `EnvValue::FromMesh` outright with \"Yubaba must resolve mesh refs before dispatching to Kamaji\" — but nothing in yubaba calls the resolver on the deploy path. So the wrong rule had not yet handed a real workload a wrong number; it was a loaded gun, not a fired one. That is also why the fix was cheap (no call sites to migrate) and why it was worth doing NOW rather than after the path is wired.")
1032/// @yah:gotcha("GENERATED ARTIFACTS REGENERATED, and they carry MORE than this ticket. `.yah/schema/workload.toml.schema.json` and `packages/yah/workload-spec/index.ts` are generated from these Rust types and the pre-commit regen was disabled 2026-08-15, so they had gone stale at R844-F17 — the TS binding still said `ports: Array<number>` weeks after `MeshExpose.ports` became `Vec<MeshPort>`. Running `cargo run -p xtask -- emit-schemas` and the workload-spec `export-ts` bin swept BOTH F17 drift and this ticket. Diff is confined to the two expected surfaces (`MeshExpose.ports`, `MeshLookup`) and nothing else. Flagging per the shared-tree rule that a derived file is nobody property: whoever owns R844-F17 should know their type change is now reflected in the bindings.")
1033pub fn resolve_env_from_mesh(
1034 env: &[EnvVar],
1035 resolver: &dyn MeshResolver,
1036) -> Result<Vec<EnvVar>, MeshError> {
1037 env.iter()
1038 .map(|var| match &var.value {
1039 EnvValue::FromMesh { ident, kind } => {
1040 let value = resolver.resolve(ident, kind.clone())?;
1041 Ok(EnvVar {
1042 name: var.name.clone(),
1043 value: EnvValue::Literal { value },
1044 })
1045 }
1046 _ => Ok(var.clone()),
1047 })
1048 .collect()
1049}
1050
1051/// Run shape then semantic validation in the correct order.
1052///
1053/// Shape always runs first. If shape fails, `WorkloadValidationError::Shape`
1054/// is returned and semantic checks are skipped — callers never see a
1055/// `Semantic` error for a structurally invalid spec.
1056///
1057/// `machine_id` is forwarded to the capacity admission-control check.
1058/// `batch` is the set of co-deployed mesh idents for forward-reference
1059/// resolution; pass `&[]` for single-spec deployment.
1060pub fn all(
1061 spec: &WorkloadSpec,
1062 ctx: &dyn ValidationContext,
1063 machine_id: &MachineId,
1064 batch: &[MeshIdent],
1065) -> Result<(), WorkloadValidationError> {
1066 shape(spec)?;
1067 semantic(spec, ctx, machine_id, batch)
1068}