Skip to main content

trustformers_debug/environmental_monitor/
efficiency_analysis.rs

1//! Efficiency analysis and optimization for environmental monitoring
2// reason: debug/profiling scaffolding — structs are constructed and their fields/methods
3// are retained for the data model, serialization completeness, and future consumers that
4// do not yet read every member. Consolidated from many item-level #[allow(dead_code)].
5#![allow(dead_code)]
6
7use crate::environmental_monitor::types::*;
8use anyhow::Result;
9use std::collections::HashMap;
10use tracing::info;
11
12/// Efficiency analysis and optimization system
13#[derive(Debug)]
14pub struct EfficiencyAnalyzer {
15    optimization_opportunities: Vec<EfficiencyOpportunity>,
16    energy_waste_detector: EnergyWasteDetector,
17    scheduling_optimizer: SchedulingOptimizer,
18    model_efficiency_analyzer: ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer,
19}
20
21/// Energy waste detection system
22#[derive(Debug)]
23struct EnergyWasteDetector {
24    idle_detection_threshold: f64,
25    inefficiency_patterns: Vec<WastePattern>,
26    waste_measurements: Vec<WasteMeasurement>,
27}
28
29/// Training/inference scheduling optimizer for energy efficiency
30#[derive(Debug)]
31struct SchedulingOptimizer {
32    carbon_intensity_forecasts: Vec<CarbonForecast>,
33    energy_price_forecasts: Vec<EnergyPriceForecast>,
34    optimal_schedules: Vec<OptimalSchedule>,
35}
36
37/// Model-specific efficiency analysis
38#[derive(Debug)]
39struct ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer {
40    model_profiles: HashMap<String, ModelEnergyProfile>,
41    efficiency_benchmarks: HashMap<String, f64>,
42    optimization_recommendations: Vec<ModelOptimizationRecommendation>,
43}
44
45#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
46pub struct WastePattern {
47    pattern_name: String,
48    detection_criteria: Vec<String>,
49    typical_waste_percentage: f64,
50    mitigation_strategy: String,
51}
52
53#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
54struct CarbonForecast {
55    timestamp: std::time::SystemTime,
56    predicted_carbon_intensity: f64,
57    renewable_percentage: f64,
58    confidence: f64,
59}
60
61#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
62struct EnergyPriceForecast {
63    timestamp: std::time::SystemTime,
64    predicted_price_per_kwh: f64,
65    confidence: f64,
66}
67
68impl EfficiencyAnalyzer {
69    /// Create a new efficiency analyzer
70    pub fn new() -> Self {
71        Self {
72            optimization_opportunities: Vec::new(),
73            energy_waste_detector: EnergyWasteDetector {
74                idle_detection_threshold: 0.1,
75                inefficiency_patterns: Vec::new(),
76                waste_measurements: Vec::new(),
77            },
78            scheduling_optimizer: SchedulingOptimizer {
79                carbon_intensity_forecasts: Vec::new(),
80                energy_price_forecasts: Vec::new(),
81                optimal_schedules: Vec::new(),
82            },
83            model_efficiency_analyzer: ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer {
84                model_profiles: HashMap::new(),
85                efficiency_benchmarks: HashMap::new(),
86                optimization_recommendations: Vec::new(),
87            },
88        }
89    }
90
91    /// Analyze efficiency opportunities
92    pub async fn analyze_efficiency_opportunities(&self) -> Result<Vec<EfficiencyOpportunity>> {
93        Ok(vec![
94            EfficiencyOpportunity {
95                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::ModelArchitecture,
96                description: "Implement model pruning".to_string(),
97                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 50.0,
98                potential_cost_savings_usd: 6.0,
99                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 20.0,
100                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Medium,
101                confidence: 0.85,
102                recommendation: "Use structured pruning to reduce model size by 30%".to_string(),
103            },
104            EfficiencyOpportunity {
105                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::SchedulingOptimization,
106                description: "Optimize training schedule".to_string(),
107                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 0.0,
108                potential_cost_savings_usd: 25.0,
109                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 35.0,
110                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
111                confidence: 0.9,
112                recommendation: "Schedule training during low-carbon intensity hours".to_string(),
113            },
114            EfficiencyOpportunity {
115                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::BatchSizeOptimization,
116                description: "Optimize batch size for better GPU utilization".to_string(),
117                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 15.0,
118                potential_cost_savings_usd: 1.8,
119                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 6.0,
120                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
121                confidence: 0.95,
122                recommendation: "Increase batch size to 64 for optimal memory utilization"
123                    .to_string(),
124            },
125            EfficiencyOpportunity {
126                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::PrecisionOptimization,
127                description: "Implement mixed precision training".to_string(),
128                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 25.0,
129                potential_cost_savings_usd: 3.0,
130                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 10.0,
131                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
132                confidence: 0.92,
133                recommendation: "Use FP16 for forward pass and FP32 for gradients".to_string(),
134            },
135        ])
136    }
137
138    /// Detect energy waste patterns
139    pub async fn detect_energy_waste(
140        &mut self,
141        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
142    ) -> Result<Vec<WasteMeasurement>> {
143        let mut waste_measurements = Vec::new();
144
145        // Detect idle GPU waste. A measurement with no utilization reading
146        // cannot be judged idle -- previously every session measurement was
147        // scored against a fabricated 0.8.
148        if let Some(utilization) = energy_measurement.utilization {
149            if utilization < self.energy_waste_detector.idle_detection_threshold {
150                let idle_waste = WasteMeasurement {
151                    timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
152                    waste_type: WasteType::IdleResources,
153                    wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.3, // 30% waste when idle
154                    wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.3 * 0.12, // $0.12/kWh
155                    efficiency_lost_percentage: (1.0 - utilization) * 100.0,
156                    description: "GPU running below utilization threshold".to_string(),
157                };
158                waste_measurements.push(idle_waste);
159            }
160        }
161
162        // Detect thermal throttling waste
163        if let Some(temp) = energy_measurement.temperature {
164            if temp > 85.0 {
165                let thermal_waste = WasteMeasurement {
166                    timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
167                    waste_type: WasteType::ThermalThrottling,
168                    wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.15, // 15% waste from throttling
169                    wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.15 * 0.12,
170                    efficiency_lost_percentage: 15.0,
171                    description: format!("Thermal throttling detected at {:.1}°C", temp),
172                };
173                waste_measurements.push(thermal_waste);
174            }
175        }
176
177        // Detect inefficient utilization
178        if let Some(efficiency_ratio) = energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio {
179            if efficiency_ratio < 0.7 {
180                let inefficient_waste = WasteMeasurement {
181                    timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
182                    waste_type: WasteType::InefficientAlgorithm,
183                    wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * (1.0 - efficiency_ratio),
184                    wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh
185                        * (1.0 - efficiency_ratio)
186                        * 0.12,
187                    efficiency_lost_percentage: (1.0 - efficiency_ratio) * 100.0,
188                    description: "Low computational efficiency detected".to_string(),
189                };
190                waste_measurements.push(inefficient_waste);
191            }
192        }
193
194        self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements.extend(waste_measurements.clone());
195        Ok(waste_measurements)
196    }
197
198    /// Analyze session efficiency
199    pub async fn analyze_session_efficiency(
200        &self,
201        session_info: &SessionInfo,
202        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
203    ) -> Result<SessionEfficiencyAnalysis> {
204        let theoretical_minimum_energy =
205            self.calculate_theoretical_minimum_energy(session_info).await?;
206        let efficiency_ratio = theoretical_minimum_energy / energy_measurement.energy_kwh;
207
208        Ok(SessionEfficiencyAnalysis {
209            efficiency_score: efficiency_ratio,
210            waste_percentage: (1.0 - efficiency_ratio) * 100.0,
211            optimization_opportunities: self.analyze_efficiency_opportunities().await?,
212            // No reference baselines exist to compare this session against;
213            // the crate observes one machine and holds no CPU-only,
214            // previous-generation or cloud measurement, and no population to
215            // rank within. These used to be published as 8.5x / 1.2x / 0.9x /
216            // 75th percentile.
217            comparative_analysis: ComparativeEfficiency {
218                vs_cpu_only: None,
219                vs_previous_generation: None,
220                vs_cloud_baseline: None,
221                efficiency_percentile: None,
222            },
223        })
224    }
225
226    /// Calculate theoretical minimum energy for a session
227    async fn calculate_theoretical_minimum_energy(
228        &self,
229        session_info: &SessionInfo,
230    ) -> Result<f64> {
231        // Simplified theoretical minimum calculation based on session type
232        let base_efficiency = match session_info.session_type {
233            MeasurementType::Training => 0.45, // 45% of actual is theoretical minimum
234            MeasurementType::Inference => 0.65, // 65% of actual
235            MeasurementType::DataPreprocessing => 0.55,
236            MeasurementType::ModelEvaluation => 0.60,
237            MeasurementType::Development => 0.70,
238        };
239
240        // Adjust for model complexity
241        let complexity_factor = if session_info.workload_description.contains("transformer") {
242            0.9 // Transformers are inherently less efficient
243        } else if session_info.workload_description.contains("cnn") {
244            1.1 // CNNs can be more efficient
245        } else {
246            1.0
247        };
248
249        Ok(session_info.estimated_energy_kwh * base_efficiency * complexity_factor)
250    }
251
252    /// Identify efficiency bottlenecks
253    pub async fn identify_efficiency_bottlenecks(
254        &self,
255        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
256    ) -> Result<Vec<String>> {
257        let mut bottlenecks = Vec::new();
258
259        if energy_measurement.utilization.is_some_and(|u| u < 0.8) {
260            bottlenecks.push("GPU underutilization - consider increasing batch size".to_string());
261        }
262
263        if let Some(temp) = energy_measurement.temperature {
264            if temp > 80.0 {
265                bottlenecks.push("High temperature causing thermal throttling".to_string());
266            }
267        }
268
269        if energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio.is_some_and(|e| e < 0.7) {
270            bottlenecks
271                .push("Low computational efficiency - algorithm optimization needed".to_string());
272        }
273
274        if bottlenecks.is_empty() {
275            bottlenecks.push("No significant bottlenecks detected".to_string());
276        }
277
278        Ok(bottlenecks)
279    }
280
281    /// Calculate optimization potential
282    pub async fn calculate_optimization_potential(&self, current_efficiency: f64) -> Result<f64> {
283        // Calculate theoretical maximum improvement
284        let max_theoretical_efficiency = 0.95; // 95% is realistic maximum
285        let current_efficiency = current_efficiency.max(0.1).min(0.95);
286
287        let potential_improvement =
288            (max_theoretical_efficiency - current_efficiency) / current_efficiency;
289        Ok(potential_improvement.min(0.5)) // Cap at 50% improvement
290    }
291
292    /// Get model optimization recommendations
293    pub async fn get_model_optimization_recommendations(
294        &self,
295    ) -> Result<Vec<ModelOptimizationRecommendation>> {
296        Ok(vec![
297            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
298                recommendation_type: "Gradient Checkpointing".to_string(),
299                description: "Reduce memory usage by recomputing activations".to_string(),
300                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
301                    energy_savings_kwh: 12.0,
302                    cost_savings_usd: 1.44,
303                    carbon_reduction_kg: 4.8,
304                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 15.0,
305                },
306                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::Low,
307            },
308            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
309                recommendation_type: "Dynamic Loss Scaling".to_string(),
310                description: "Optimize mixed precision training stability".to_string(),
311                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
312                    energy_savings_kwh: 8.0,
313                    cost_savings_usd: 0.96,
314                    carbon_reduction_kg: 3.2,
315                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 10.0,
316                },
317                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::Low,
318            },
319            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
320                recommendation_type: "Model Parallelization".to_string(),
321                description: "Distribute model across multiple GPUs efficiently".to_string(),
322                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
323                    energy_savings_kwh: 25.0,
324                    cost_savings_usd: 3.0,
325                    carbon_reduction_kg: 10.0,
326                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 30.0,
327                },
328                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::High,
329            },
330        ])
331    }
332
333    /// Get waste measurements history
334    pub fn get_waste_measurements(&self) -> &[WasteMeasurement] {
335        &self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements
336    }
337
338    /// Clear waste measurements history
339    pub fn clear_waste_history(&mut self) {
340        self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements.clear();
341    }
342
343    /// Add a custom efficiency pattern
344    pub fn add_waste_pattern(&mut self, pattern: WastePattern) {
345        self.energy_waste_detector.inefficiency_patterns.push(pattern);
346    }
347
348    /// Get current optimization opportunities
349    pub fn get_optimization_opportunities(&self) -> &[EfficiencyOpportunity] {
350        &self.optimization_opportunities
351    }
352
353    /// Update optimization opportunities based on recent measurements
354    pub async fn update_optimization_opportunities(
355        &mut self,
356        measurements: &[EnergyMeasurement],
357    ) -> Result<()> {
358        self.optimization_opportunities.clear();
359
360        // Analyze recent measurements for patterns. Averages are taken over
361        // the measurements that actually carry the quantity, and are `None`
362        // when none of them does -- a measurement without a utilization
363        // reading must not be folded in as if it were a zero (nor, as before,
364        // as a fabricated 0.8).
365        let mean = |values: Vec<f64>| -> Option<f64> {
366            if values.is_empty() {
367                None
368            } else {
369                Some(values.iter().sum::<f64>() / values.len() as f64)
370            }
371        };
372        let avg_utilization = mean(measurements.iter().filter_map(|m| m.utilization).collect());
373        let avg_efficiency = mean(measurements.iter().filter_map(|m| m.efficiency_ratio).collect());
374
375        // Add opportunities based on analysis
376        if avg_utilization.is_some_and(|u| u < 0.7) {
377            self.optimization_opportunities.push(EfficiencyOpportunity {
378                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::HardwareUtilization,
379                description: "Improve GPU utilization".to_string(),
380                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 20.0,
381                potential_cost_savings_usd: 2.4,
382                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 8.0,
383                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Medium,
384                confidence: 0.9,
385                recommendation: "Increase batch size or use pipeline parallelism".to_string(),
386            });
387        }
388
389        if avg_efficiency.is_some_and(|e| e < 0.8) {
390            self.optimization_opportunities.push(EfficiencyOpportunity {
391                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::TrainingOptimization,
392                description: "Optimize training algorithm".to_string(),
393                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 30.0,
394                potential_cost_savings_usd: 3.6,
395                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 12.0,
396                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::High,
397                confidence: 0.8,
398                recommendation: "Implement gradient accumulation and mixed precision".to_string(),
399            });
400        }
401
402        info!(
403            "Updated optimization opportunities: {} found",
404            self.optimization_opportunities.len()
405        );
406        Ok(())
407    }
408}
409
410#[cfg(test)]
411mod tests {
412    use super::*;
413    use std::time::SystemTime;
414
415    #[test]
416    fn test_efficiency_analyzer_creation() {
417        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
418        assert_eq!(analyzer.optimization_opportunities.len(), 0);
419    }
420
421    #[tokio::test]
422    async fn test_efficiency_opportunities() {
423        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
424        let opportunities = analyzer
425            .analyze_efficiency_opportunities()
426            .await
427            .expect("async operation failed");
428
429        assert!(!opportunities.is_empty());
430        assert!(opportunities.iter().all(|o| o.potential_carbon_reduction_kg >= 0.0));
431        assert!(opportunities.iter().all(|o| o.confidence > 0.0 && o.confidence <= 1.0));
432    }
433
434    #[tokio::test]
435    async fn test_waste_detection() {
436        let mut analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
437        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
438            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
439            device_id: "test-gpu".to_string(),
440            power_watts: 300.0,
441            energy_kwh: 1.0,
442            utilization: Some(0.05),     // Very low utilization
443            temperature: Some(90.0),     // High temperature
444            efficiency_ratio: Some(0.6), // Low efficiency
445        };
446
447        let waste = analyzer
448            .detect_energy_waste(&energy_measurement)
449            .await
450            .expect("async operation failed");
451        assert!(!waste.is_empty());
452
453        // Should detect multiple waste types
454        let waste_types: Vec<_> = waste.iter().map(|w| &w.waste_type).collect();
455        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::IdleResources));
456        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::ThermalThrottling));
457        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::InefficientAlgorithm));
458    }
459
460    #[tokio::test]
461    async fn test_session_efficiency_analysis() {
462        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
463        let session_info = SessionInfo {
464            session_id: "test".to_string(),
465            start_time: std::time::SystemTime::now(),
466            session_type: MeasurementType::Training,
467            duration_hours: 1.0,
468            workload_description: "transformer training".to_string(),
469            region: "US-West".to_string(),
470            estimated_energy_kwh: 2.0,
471        };
472
473        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
474            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
475            device_id: "test".to_string(),
476            power_watts: 500.0,
477            energy_kwh: 2.0,
478            utilization: Some(0.8),
479            temperature: Some(75.0),
480            efficiency_ratio: Some(0.85),
481        };
482
483        let analysis = analyzer
484            .analyze_session_efficiency(&session_info, &energy_measurement)
485            .await
486            .expect("operation failed in test");
487        assert!(analysis.efficiency_score > 0.0);
488        assert!(analysis.waste_percentage >= 0.0);
489        assert!(!analysis.optimization_opportunities.is_empty());
490    }
491
492    #[tokio::test]
493    async fn test_bottleneck_identification() {
494        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
495        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
496            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
497            device_id: "test".to_string(),
498            power_watts: 400.0,
499            energy_kwh: 1.5,
500            utilization: Some(0.5),      // Low utilization
501            temperature: Some(85.0),     // High temperature
502            efficiency_ratio: Some(0.6), // Low efficiency
503        };
504
505        let bottlenecks = analyzer
506            .identify_efficiency_bottlenecks(&energy_measurement)
507            .await
508            .expect("async operation failed");
509        assert!(!bottlenecks.is_empty());
510        assert!(bottlenecks.len() >= 3); // Should identify multiple bottlenecks
511    }
512
513    #[tokio::test]
514    async fn test_optimization_potential() {
515        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
516
517        let low_efficiency_potential = analyzer
518            .calculate_optimization_potential(0.5)
519            .await
520            .expect("async operation failed");
521        let high_efficiency_potential = analyzer
522            .calculate_optimization_potential(0.9)
523            .await
524            .expect("async operation failed");
525
526        assert!(low_efficiency_potential > high_efficiency_potential);
527        assert!(low_efficiency_potential <= 0.5); // Capped at 50%
528    }
529
530    #[tokio::test]
531    async fn test_model_optimization_recommendations() {
532        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
533        let recommendations = analyzer
534            .get_model_optimization_recommendations()
535            .await
536            .expect("async operation failed");
537
538        assert!(!recommendations.is_empty());
539        assert!(recommendations.iter().all(|r| r.potential_savings.energy_savings_kwh >= 0.0));
540        assert!(recommendations.iter().all(|r| r.potential_savings.carbon_reduction_kg >= 0.0));
541    }
542}