Skip to main content

trustformers_debug/environmental_monitor/
efficiency_analysis.rs

1//! Efficiency analysis and optimization for environmental monitoring
2// reason: debug/profiling scaffolding — structs are constructed and their fields/methods
3// are retained for the data model, serialization completeness, and future consumers that
4// do not yet read every member. Consolidated from many item-level #[allow(dead_code)].
5#![allow(dead_code)]
6
7use crate::environmental_monitor::types::*;
8use anyhow::Result;
9use std::collections::HashMap;
10use tracing::info;
11
12/// Efficiency analysis and optimization system
13#[derive(Debug)]
14pub struct EfficiencyAnalyzer {
15    optimization_opportunities: Vec<EfficiencyOpportunity>,
16    energy_waste_detector: EnergyWasteDetector,
17    scheduling_optimizer: SchedulingOptimizer,
18    model_efficiency_analyzer: ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer,
19}
20
21/// Energy waste detection system
22#[derive(Debug)]
23struct EnergyWasteDetector {
24    idle_detection_threshold: f64,
25    inefficiency_patterns: Vec<WastePattern>,
26    waste_measurements: Vec<WasteMeasurement>,
27}
28
29/// Training/inference scheduling optimizer for energy efficiency
30#[derive(Debug)]
31struct SchedulingOptimizer {
32    carbon_intensity_forecasts: Vec<CarbonForecast>,
33    energy_price_forecasts: Vec<EnergyPriceForecast>,
34    optimal_schedules: Vec<OptimalSchedule>,
35}
36
37/// Model-specific efficiency analysis
38#[derive(Debug)]
39struct ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer {
40    model_profiles: HashMap<String, ModelEnergyProfile>,
41    efficiency_benchmarks: HashMap<String, f64>,
42    optimization_recommendations: Vec<ModelOptimizationRecommendation>,
43}
44
45#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
46pub struct WastePattern {
47    pattern_name: String,
48    detection_criteria: Vec<String>,
49    typical_waste_percentage: f64,
50    mitigation_strategy: String,
51}
52
53#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
54struct CarbonForecast {
55    timestamp: std::time::SystemTime,
56    predicted_carbon_intensity: f64,
57    renewable_percentage: f64,
58    confidence: f64,
59}
60
61#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
62struct EnergyPriceForecast {
63    timestamp: std::time::SystemTime,
64    predicted_price_per_kwh: f64,
65    confidence: f64,
66}
67
68impl EfficiencyAnalyzer {
69    /// Create a new efficiency analyzer
70    pub fn new() -> Self {
71        Self {
72            optimization_opportunities: Vec::new(),
73            energy_waste_detector: EnergyWasteDetector {
74                idle_detection_threshold: 0.1,
75                inefficiency_patterns: Vec::new(),
76                waste_measurements: Vec::new(),
77            },
78            scheduling_optimizer: SchedulingOptimizer {
79                carbon_intensity_forecasts: Vec::new(),
80                energy_price_forecasts: Vec::new(),
81                optimal_schedules: Vec::new(),
82            },
83            model_efficiency_analyzer: ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer {
84                model_profiles: HashMap::new(),
85                efficiency_benchmarks: HashMap::new(),
86                optimization_recommendations: Vec::new(),
87            },
88        }
89    }
90
91    /// Analyze efficiency opportunities
92    pub async fn analyze_efficiency_opportunities(&self) -> Result<Vec<EfficiencyOpportunity>> {
93        Ok(vec![
94            EfficiencyOpportunity {
95                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::ModelArchitecture,
96                description: "Implement model pruning".to_string(),
97                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 50.0,
98                potential_cost_savings_usd: 6.0,
99                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 20.0,
100                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Medium,
101                confidence: 0.85,
102                recommendation: "Use structured pruning to reduce model size by 30%".to_string(),
103            },
104            EfficiencyOpportunity {
105                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::SchedulingOptimization,
106                description: "Optimize training schedule".to_string(),
107                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 0.0,
108                potential_cost_savings_usd: 25.0,
109                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 35.0,
110                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
111                confidence: 0.9,
112                recommendation: "Schedule training during low-carbon intensity hours".to_string(),
113            },
114            EfficiencyOpportunity {
115                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::BatchSizeOptimization,
116                description: "Optimize batch size for better GPU utilization".to_string(),
117                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 15.0,
118                potential_cost_savings_usd: 1.8,
119                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 6.0,
120                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
121                confidence: 0.95,
122                recommendation: "Increase batch size to 64 for optimal memory utilization"
123                    .to_string(),
124            },
125            EfficiencyOpportunity {
126                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::PrecisionOptimization,
127                description: "Implement mixed precision training".to_string(),
128                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 25.0,
129                potential_cost_savings_usd: 3.0,
130                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 10.0,
131                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
132                confidence: 0.92,
133                recommendation: "Use FP16 for forward pass and FP32 for gradients".to_string(),
134            },
135        ])
136    }
137
138    /// Detect energy waste patterns
139    pub async fn detect_energy_waste(
140        &mut self,
141        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
142    ) -> Result<Vec<WasteMeasurement>> {
143        let mut waste_measurements = Vec::new();
144
145        // Detect idle GPU waste
146        if energy_measurement.utilization < self.energy_waste_detector.idle_detection_threshold {
147            let idle_waste = WasteMeasurement {
148                timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
149                waste_type: WasteType::IdleResources,
150                wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.3, // 30% waste when idle
151                wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.3 * 0.12, // Assuming $0.12/kWh
152                efficiency_lost_percentage: (1.0 - energy_measurement.utilization) * 100.0,
153                description: "GPU running below utilization threshold".to_string(),
154            };
155            waste_measurements.push(idle_waste);
156        }
157
158        // Detect thermal throttling waste
159        if let Some(temp) = energy_measurement.temperature {
160            if temp > 85.0 {
161                let thermal_waste = WasteMeasurement {
162                    timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
163                    waste_type: WasteType::ThermalThrottling,
164                    wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.15, // 15% waste from throttling
165                    wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.15 * 0.12,
166                    efficiency_lost_percentage: 15.0,
167                    description: format!("Thermal throttling detected at {:.1}°C", temp),
168                };
169                waste_measurements.push(thermal_waste);
170            }
171        }
172
173        // Detect inefficient utilization
174        if energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio < 0.7 {
175            let inefficient_waste = WasteMeasurement {
176                timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
177                waste_type: WasteType::InefficientAlgorithm,
178                wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh
179                    * (1.0 - energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio),
180                wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh
181                    * (1.0 - energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio)
182                    * 0.12,
183                efficiency_lost_percentage: (1.0 - energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio) * 100.0,
184                description: "Low computational efficiency detected".to_string(),
185            };
186            waste_measurements.push(inefficient_waste);
187        }
188
189        self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements.extend(waste_measurements.clone());
190        Ok(waste_measurements)
191    }
192
193    /// Analyze session efficiency
194    pub async fn analyze_session_efficiency(
195        &self,
196        session_info: &SessionInfo,
197        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
198    ) -> Result<SessionEfficiencyAnalysis> {
199        let theoretical_minimum_energy =
200            self.calculate_theoretical_minimum_energy(session_info).await?;
201        let efficiency_ratio = theoretical_minimum_energy / energy_measurement.energy_kwh;
202
203        Ok(SessionEfficiencyAnalysis {
204            efficiency_score: efficiency_ratio,
205            waste_percentage: (1.0 - efficiency_ratio) * 100.0,
206            optimization_opportunities: self.analyze_efficiency_opportunities().await?,
207            comparative_analysis: ComparativeEfficiency {
208                vs_cpu_only: 8.5,            // GPU is 8.5x more efficient than CPU
209                vs_previous_generation: 1.2, // 20% improvement over previous gen
210                vs_cloud_baseline: 0.9,      // 10% less efficient than cloud baseline
211                efficiency_percentile: 75.0, // 75th percentile
212            },
213        })
214    }
215
216    /// Calculate theoretical minimum energy for a session
217    async fn calculate_theoretical_minimum_energy(
218        &self,
219        session_info: &SessionInfo,
220    ) -> Result<f64> {
221        // Simplified theoretical minimum calculation based on session type
222        let base_efficiency = match session_info.session_type {
223            MeasurementType::Training => 0.45, // 45% of actual is theoretical minimum
224            MeasurementType::Inference => 0.65, // 65% of actual
225            MeasurementType::DataPreprocessing => 0.55,
226            MeasurementType::ModelEvaluation => 0.60,
227            MeasurementType::Development => 0.70,
228        };
229
230        // Adjust for model complexity
231        let complexity_factor = if session_info.workload_description.contains("transformer") {
232            0.9 // Transformers are inherently less efficient
233        } else if session_info.workload_description.contains("cnn") {
234            1.1 // CNNs can be more efficient
235        } else {
236            1.0
237        };
238
239        Ok(session_info.estimated_energy_kwh * base_efficiency * complexity_factor)
240    }
241
242    /// Identify efficiency bottlenecks
243    pub async fn identify_efficiency_bottlenecks(
244        &self,
245        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
246    ) -> Result<Vec<String>> {
247        let mut bottlenecks = Vec::new();
248
249        if energy_measurement.utilization < 0.8 {
250            bottlenecks.push("GPU underutilization - consider increasing batch size".to_string());
251        }
252
253        if let Some(temp) = energy_measurement.temperature {
254            if temp > 80.0 {
255                bottlenecks.push("High temperature causing thermal throttling".to_string());
256            }
257        }
258
259        if energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio < 0.7 {
260            bottlenecks
261                .push("Low computational efficiency - algorithm optimization needed".to_string());
262        }
263
264        if bottlenecks.is_empty() {
265            bottlenecks.push("No significant bottlenecks detected".to_string());
266        }
267
268        Ok(bottlenecks)
269    }
270
271    /// Calculate optimization potential
272    pub async fn calculate_optimization_potential(&self, current_efficiency: f64) -> Result<f64> {
273        // Calculate theoretical maximum improvement
274        let max_theoretical_efficiency = 0.95; // 95% is realistic maximum
275        let current_efficiency = current_efficiency.max(0.1).min(0.95);
276
277        let potential_improvement =
278            (max_theoretical_efficiency - current_efficiency) / current_efficiency;
279        Ok(potential_improvement.min(0.5)) // Cap at 50% improvement
280    }
281
282    /// Get model optimization recommendations
283    pub async fn get_model_optimization_recommendations(
284        &self,
285    ) -> Result<Vec<ModelOptimizationRecommendation>> {
286        Ok(vec![
287            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
288                recommendation_type: "Gradient Checkpointing".to_string(),
289                description: "Reduce memory usage by recomputing activations".to_string(),
290                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
291                    energy_savings_kwh: 12.0,
292                    cost_savings_usd: 1.44,
293                    carbon_reduction_kg: 4.8,
294                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 15.0,
295                },
296                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::Low,
297            },
298            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
299                recommendation_type: "Dynamic Loss Scaling".to_string(),
300                description: "Optimize mixed precision training stability".to_string(),
301                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
302                    energy_savings_kwh: 8.0,
303                    cost_savings_usd: 0.96,
304                    carbon_reduction_kg: 3.2,
305                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 10.0,
306                },
307                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::Low,
308            },
309            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
310                recommendation_type: "Model Parallelization".to_string(),
311                description: "Distribute model across multiple GPUs efficiently".to_string(),
312                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
313                    energy_savings_kwh: 25.0,
314                    cost_savings_usd: 3.0,
315                    carbon_reduction_kg: 10.0,
316                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 30.0,
317                },
318                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::High,
319            },
320        ])
321    }
322
323    /// Get waste measurements history
324    pub fn get_waste_measurements(&self) -> &[WasteMeasurement] {
325        &self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements
326    }
327
328    /// Clear waste measurements history
329    pub fn clear_waste_history(&mut self) {
330        self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements.clear();
331    }
332
333    /// Add a custom efficiency pattern
334    pub fn add_waste_pattern(&mut self, pattern: WastePattern) {
335        self.energy_waste_detector.inefficiency_patterns.push(pattern);
336    }
337
338    /// Get current optimization opportunities
339    pub fn get_optimization_opportunities(&self) -> &[EfficiencyOpportunity] {
340        &self.optimization_opportunities
341    }
342
343    /// Update optimization opportunities based on recent measurements
344    pub async fn update_optimization_opportunities(
345        &mut self,
346        measurements: &[EnergyMeasurement],
347    ) -> Result<()> {
348        self.optimization_opportunities.clear();
349
350        // Analyze recent measurements for patterns
351        let avg_utilization: f64 =
352            measurements.iter().map(|m| m.utilization).sum::<f64>() / measurements.len() as f64;
353        let avg_efficiency: f64 = measurements.iter().map(|m| m.efficiency_ratio).sum::<f64>()
354            / measurements.len() as f64;
355
356        // Add opportunities based on analysis
357        if avg_utilization < 0.7 {
358            self.optimization_opportunities.push(EfficiencyOpportunity {
359                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::HardwareUtilization,
360                description: "Improve GPU utilization".to_string(),
361                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 20.0,
362                potential_cost_savings_usd: 2.4,
363                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 8.0,
364                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Medium,
365                confidence: 0.9,
366                recommendation: "Increase batch size or use pipeline parallelism".to_string(),
367            });
368        }
369
370        if avg_efficiency < 0.8 {
371            self.optimization_opportunities.push(EfficiencyOpportunity {
372                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::TrainingOptimization,
373                description: "Optimize training algorithm".to_string(),
374                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 30.0,
375                potential_cost_savings_usd: 3.6,
376                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 12.0,
377                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::High,
378                confidence: 0.8,
379                recommendation: "Implement gradient accumulation and mixed precision".to_string(),
380            });
381        }
382
383        info!(
384            "Updated optimization opportunities: {} found",
385            self.optimization_opportunities.len()
386        );
387        Ok(())
388    }
389}
390
391#[cfg(test)]
392mod tests {
393    use super::*;
394    use std::time::SystemTime;
395
396    #[test]
397    fn test_efficiency_analyzer_creation() {
398        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
399        assert_eq!(analyzer.optimization_opportunities.len(), 0);
400    }
401
402    #[tokio::test]
403    async fn test_efficiency_opportunities() {
404        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
405        let opportunities = analyzer
406            .analyze_efficiency_opportunities()
407            .await
408            .expect("async operation failed");
409
410        assert!(!opportunities.is_empty());
411        assert!(opportunities.iter().all(|o| o.potential_carbon_reduction_kg >= 0.0));
412        assert!(opportunities.iter().all(|o| o.confidence > 0.0 && o.confidence <= 1.0));
413    }
414
415    #[tokio::test]
416    async fn test_waste_detection() {
417        let mut analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
418        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
419            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
420            device_id: "test-gpu".to_string(),
421            power_watts: 300.0,
422            energy_kwh: 1.0,
423            utilization: 0.05,       // Very low utilization
424            temperature: Some(90.0), // High temperature
425            efficiency_ratio: 0.6,   // Low efficiency
426        };
427
428        let waste = analyzer
429            .detect_energy_waste(&energy_measurement)
430            .await
431            .expect("async operation failed");
432        assert!(!waste.is_empty());
433
434        // Should detect multiple waste types
435        let waste_types: Vec<_> = waste.iter().map(|w| &w.waste_type).collect();
436        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::IdleResources));
437        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::ThermalThrottling));
438        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::InefficientAlgorithm));
439    }
440
441    #[tokio::test]
442    async fn test_session_efficiency_analysis() {
443        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
444        let session_info = SessionInfo {
445            session_id: "test".to_string(),
446            start_time: std::time::SystemTime::now(),
447            session_type: MeasurementType::Training,
448            duration_hours: 1.0,
449            workload_description: "transformer training".to_string(),
450            region: "US-West".to_string(),
451            estimated_energy_kwh: 2.0,
452        };
453
454        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
455            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
456            device_id: "test".to_string(),
457            power_watts: 500.0,
458            energy_kwh: 2.0,
459            utilization: 0.8,
460            temperature: Some(75.0),
461            efficiency_ratio: 0.85,
462        };
463
464        let analysis = analyzer
465            .analyze_session_efficiency(&session_info, &energy_measurement)
466            .await
467            .expect("operation failed in test");
468        assert!(analysis.efficiency_score > 0.0);
469        assert!(analysis.waste_percentage >= 0.0);
470        assert!(!analysis.optimization_opportunities.is_empty());
471    }
472
473    #[tokio::test]
474    async fn test_bottleneck_identification() {
475        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
476        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
477            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
478            device_id: "test".to_string(),
479            power_watts: 400.0,
480            energy_kwh: 1.5,
481            utilization: 0.5,        // Low utilization
482            temperature: Some(85.0), // High temperature
483            efficiency_ratio: 0.6,   // Low efficiency
484        };
485
486        let bottlenecks = analyzer
487            .identify_efficiency_bottlenecks(&energy_measurement)
488            .await
489            .expect("async operation failed");
490        assert!(!bottlenecks.is_empty());
491        assert!(bottlenecks.len() >= 3); // Should identify multiple bottlenecks
492    }
493
494    #[tokio::test]
495    async fn test_optimization_potential() {
496        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
497
498        let low_efficiency_potential = analyzer
499            .calculate_optimization_potential(0.5)
500            .await
501            .expect("async operation failed");
502        let high_efficiency_potential = analyzer
503            .calculate_optimization_potential(0.9)
504            .await
505            .expect("async operation failed");
506
507        assert!(low_efficiency_potential > high_efficiency_potential);
508        assert!(low_efficiency_potential <= 0.5); // Capped at 50%
509    }
510
511    #[tokio::test]
512    async fn test_model_optimization_recommendations() {
513        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
514        let recommendations = analyzer
515            .get_model_optimization_recommendations()
516            .await
517            .expect("async operation failed");
518
519        assert!(!recommendations.is_empty());
520        assert!(recommendations.iter().all(|r| r.potential_savings.energy_savings_kwh >= 0.0));
521        assert!(recommendations.iter().all(|r| r.potential_savings.carbon_reduction_kg >= 0.0));
522    }
523}