Skip to main content

trustformers_debug/environmental_monitor/
efficiency_analysis.rs

1//! Efficiency analysis and optimization for environmental monitoring
2
3use crate::environmental_monitor::types::*;
4use anyhow::Result;
5use std::collections::HashMap;
6use tracing::info;
7
8/// Efficiency analysis and optimization system
9#[derive(Debug)]
10#[allow(dead_code)]
11pub struct EfficiencyAnalyzer {
12    optimization_opportunities: Vec<EfficiencyOpportunity>,
13    energy_waste_detector: EnergyWasteDetector,
14    #[allow(dead_code)]
15    scheduling_optimizer: SchedulingOptimizer,
16    model_efficiency_analyzer: ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer,
17}
18
19/// Energy waste detection system
20#[derive(Debug)]
21struct EnergyWasteDetector {
22    idle_detection_threshold: f64,
23    inefficiency_patterns: Vec<WastePattern>,
24    waste_measurements: Vec<WasteMeasurement>,
25}
26
27/// Training/inference scheduling optimizer for energy efficiency
28#[derive(Debug)]
29#[allow(dead_code)]
30struct SchedulingOptimizer {
31    #[allow(dead_code)]
32    carbon_intensity_forecasts: Vec<CarbonForecast>,
33    energy_price_forecasts: Vec<EnergyPriceForecast>,
34    optimal_schedules: Vec<OptimalSchedule>,
35}
36
37/// Model-specific efficiency analysis
38#[derive(Debug)]
39#[allow(dead_code)]
40struct ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer {
41    #[allow(dead_code)]
42    model_profiles: HashMap<String, ModelEnergyProfile>,
43    efficiency_benchmarks: HashMap<String, f64>,
44    optimization_recommendations: Vec<ModelOptimizationRecommendation>,
45}
46
47#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
48#[allow(dead_code)]
49pub struct WastePattern {
50    #[allow(dead_code)]
51    pattern_name: String,
52    detection_criteria: Vec<String>,
53    typical_waste_percentage: f64,
54    mitigation_strategy: String,
55}
56
57#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
58#[allow(dead_code)]
59struct CarbonForecast {
60    #[allow(dead_code)]
61    timestamp: std::time::SystemTime,
62    predicted_carbon_intensity: f64,
63    renewable_percentage: f64,
64    confidence: f64,
65}
66
67#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
68#[allow(dead_code)]
69struct EnergyPriceForecast {
70    #[allow(dead_code)]
71    timestamp: std::time::SystemTime,
72    predicted_price_per_kwh: f64,
73    confidence: f64,
74}
75
76impl EfficiencyAnalyzer {
77    /// Create a new efficiency analyzer
78    pub fn new() -> Self {
79        Self {
80            optimization_opportunities: Vec::new(),
81            energy_waste_detector: EnergyWasteDetector {
82                idle_detection_threshold: 0.1,
83                inefficiency_patterns: Vec::new(),
84                waste_measurements: Vec::new(),
85            },
86            scheduling_optimizer: SchedulingOptimizer {
87                carbon_intensity_forecasts: Vec::new(),
88                energy_price_forecasts: Vec::new(),
89                optimal_schedules: Vec::new(),
90            },
91            model_efficiency_analyzer: ModelEfficiencyAnalyzer {
92                model_profiles: HashMap::new(),
93                efficiency_benchmarks: HashMap::new(),
94                optimization_recommendations: Vec::new(),
95            },
96        }
97    }
98
99    /// Analyze efficiency opportunities
100    pub async fn analyze_efficiency_opportunities(&self) -> Result<Vec<EfficiencyOpportunity>> {
101        Ok(vec![
102            EfficiencyOpportunity {
103                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::ModelArchitecture,
104                description: "Implement model pruning".to_string(),
105                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 50.0,
106                potential_cost_savings_usd: 6.0,
107                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 20.0,
108                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Medium,
109                confidence: 0.85,
110                recommendation: "Use structured pruning to reduce model size by 30%".to_string(),
111            },
112            EfficiencyOpportunity {
113                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::SchedulingOptimization,
114                description: "Optimize training schedule".to_string(),
115                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 0.0,
116                potential_cost_savings_usd: 25.0,
117                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 35.0,
118                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
119                confidence: 0.9,
120                recommendation: "Schedule training during low-carbon intensity hours".to_string(),
121            },
122            EfficiencyOpportunity {
123                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::BatchSizeOptimization,
124                description: "Optimize batch size for better GPU utilization".to_string(),
125                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 15.0,
126                potential_cost_savings_usd: 1.8,
127                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 6.0,
128                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
129                confidence: 0.95,
130                recommendation: "Increase batch size to 64 for optimal memory utilization"
131                    .to_string(),
132            },
133            EfficiencyOpportunity {
134                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::PrecisionOptimization,
135                description: "Implement mixed precision training".to_string(),
136                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 25.0,
137                potential_cost_savings_usd: 3.0,
138                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 10.0,
139                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Low,
140                confidence: 0.92,
141                recommendation: "Use FP16 for forward pass and FP32 for gradients".to_string(),
142            },
143        ])
144    }
145
146    /// Detect energy waste patterns
147    pub async fn detect_energy_waste(
148        &mut self,
149        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
150    ) -> Result<Vec<WasteMeasurement>> {
151        let mut waste_measurements = Vec::new();
152
153        // Detect idle GPU waste
154        if energy_measurement.utilization < self.energy_waste_detector.idle_detection_threshold {
155            let idle_waste = WasteMeasurement {
156                timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
157                waste_type: WasteType::IdleResources,
158                wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.3, // 30% waste when idle
159                wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.3 * 0.12, // Assuming $0.12/kWh
160                efficiency_lost_percentage: (1.0 - energy_measurement.utilization) * 100.0,
161                description: "GPU running below utilization threshold".to_string(),
162            };
163            waste_measurements.push(idle_waste);
164        }
165
166        // Detect thermal throttling waste
167        if let Some(temp) = energy_measurement.temperature {
168            if temp > 85.0 {
169                let thermal_waste = WasteMeasurement {
170                    timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
171                    waste_type: WasteType::ThermalThrottling,
172                    wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.15, // 15% waste from throttling
173                    wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh * 0.15 * 0.12,
174                    efficiency_lost_percentage: 15.0,
175                    description: format!("Thermal throttling detected at {:.1}°C", temp),
176                };
177                waste_measurements.push(thermal_waste);
178            }
179        }
180
181        // Detect inefficient utilization
182        if energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio < 0.7 {
183            let inefficient_waste = WasteMeasurement {
184                timestamp: energy_measurement.timestamp,
185                waste_type: WasteType::InefficientAlgorithm,
186                wasted_energy_kwh: energy_measurement.energy_kwh
187                    * (1.0 - energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio),
188                wasted_cost_usd: energy_measurement.energy_kwh
189                    * (1.0 - energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio)
190                    * 0.12,
191                efficiency_lost_percentage: (1.0 - energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio) * 100.0,
192                description: "Low computational efficiency detected".to_string(),
193            };
194            waste_measurements.push(inefficient_waste);
195        }
196
197        self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements.extend(waste_measurements.clone());
198        Ok(waste_measurements)
199    }
200
201    /// Analyze session efficiency
202    pub async fn analyze_session_efficiency(
203        &self,
204        session_info: &SessionInfo,
205        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
206    ) -> Result<SessionEfficiencyAnalysis> {
207        let theoretical_minimum_energy =
208            self.calculate_theoretical_minimum_energy(session_info).await?;
209        let efficiency_ratio = theoretical_minimum_energy / energy_measurement.energy_kwh;
210
211        Ok(SessionEfficiencyAnalysis {
212            efficiency_score: efficiency_ratio,
213            waste_percentage: (1.0 - efficiency_ratio) * 100.0,
214            optimization_opportunities: self.analyze_efficiency_opportunities().await?,
215            comparative_analysis: ComparativeEfficiency {
216                vs_cpu_only: 8.5,            // GPU is 8.5x more efficient than CPU
217                vs_previous_generation: 1.2, // 20% improvement over previous gen
218                vs_cloud_baseline: 0.9,      // 10% less efficient than cloud baseline
219                efficiency_percentile: 75.0, // 75th percentile
220            },
221        })
222    }
223
224    /// Calculate theoretical minimum energy for a session
225    async fn calculate_theoretical_minimum_energy(
226        &self,
227        session_info: &SessionInfo,
228    ) -> Result<f64> {
229        // Simplified theoretical minimum calculation based on session type
230        let base_efficiency = match session_info.session_type {
231            MeasurementType::Training => 0.45, // 45% of actual is theoretical minimum
232            MeasurementType::Inference => 0.65, // 65% of actual
233            MeasurementType::DataPreprocessing => 0.55,
234            MeasurementType::ModelEvaluation => 0.60,
235            MeasurementType::Development => 0.70,
236        };
237
238        // Adjust for model complexity
239        let complexity_factor = if session_info.workload_description.contains("transformer") {
240            0.9 // Transformers are inherently less efficient
241        } else if session_info.workload_description.contains("cnn") {
242            1.1 // CNNs can be more efficient
243        } else {
244            1.0
245        };
246
247        Ok(session_info.estimated_energy_kwh * base_efficiency * complexity_factor)
248    }
249
250    /// Identify efficiency bottlenecks
251    pub async fn identify_efficiency_bottlenecks(
252        &self,
253        energy_measurement: &EnergyMeasurement,
254    ) -> Result<Vec<String>> {
255        let mut bottlenecks = Vec::new();
256
257        if energy_measurement.utilization < 0.8 {
258            bottlenecks.push("GPU underutilization - consider increasing batch size".to_string());
259        }
260
261        if let Some(temp) = energy_measurement.temperature {
262            if temp > 80.0 {
263                bottlenecks.push("High temperature causing thermal throttling".to_string());
264            }
265        }
266
267        if energy_measurement.efficiency_ratio < 0.7 {
268            bottlenecks
269                .push("Low computational efficiency - algorithm optimization needed".to_string());
270        }
271
272        if bottlenecks.is_empty() {
273            bottlenecks.push("No significant bottlenecks detected".to_string());
274        }
275
276        Ok(bottlenecks)
277    }
278
279    /// Calculate optimization potential
280    pub async fn calculate_optimization_potential(&self, current_efficiency: f64) -> Result<f64> {
281        // Calculate theoretical maximum improvement
282        let max_theoretical_efficiency = 0.95; // 95% is realistic maximum
283        let current_efficiency = current_efficiency.max(0.1).min(0.95);
284
285        let potential_improvement =
286            (max_theoretical_efficiency - current_efficiency) / current_efficiency;
287        Ok(potential_improvement.min(0.5)) // Cap at 50% improvement
288    }
289
290    /// Get model optimization recommendations
291    pub async fn get_model_optimization_recommendations(
292        &self,
293    ) -> Result<Vec<ModelOptimizationRecommendation>> {
294        Ok(vec![
295            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
296                recommendation_type: "Gradient Checkpointing".to_string(),
297                description: "Reduce memory usage by recomputing activations".to_string(),
298                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
299                    energy_savings_kwh: 12.0,
300                    cost_savings_usd: 1.44,
301                    carbon_reduction_kg: 4.8,
302                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 15.0,
303                },
304                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::Low,
305            },
306            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
307                recommendation_type: "Dynamic Loss Scaling".to_string(),
308                description: "Optimize mixed precision training stability".to_string(),
309                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
310                    energy_savings_kwh: 8.0,
311                    cost_savings_usd: 0.96,
312                    carbon_reduction_kg: 3.2,
313                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 10.0,
314                },
315                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::Low,
316            },
317            ModelOptimizationRecommendation {
318                recommendation_type: "Model Parallelization".to_string(),
319                description: "Distribute model across multiple GPUs efficiently".to_string(),
320                potential_savings: ProjectedSavings {
321                    energy_savings_kwh: 25.0,
322                    cost_savings_usd: 3.0,
323                    carbon_reduction_kg: 10.0,
324                    efficiency_improvement_percent: 30.0,
325                },
326                implementation_complexity: ImplementationEffort::High,
327            },
328        ])
329    }
330
331    /// Get waste measurements history
332    pub fn get_waste_measurements(&self) -> &[WasteMeasurement] {
333        &self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements
334    }
335
336    /// Clear waste measurements history
337    pub fn clear_waste_history(&mut self) {
338        self.energy_waste_detector.waste_measurements.clear();
339    }
340
341    /// Add a custom efficiency pattern
342    pub fn add_waste_pattern(&mut self, pattern: WastePattern) {
343        self.energy_waste_detector.inefficiency_patterns.push(pattern);
344    }
345
346    /// Get current optimization opportunities
347    pub fn get_optimization_opportunities(&self) -> &[EfficiencyOpportunity] {
348        &self.optimization_opportunities
349    }
350
351    /// Update optimization opportunities based on recent measurements
352    pub async fn update_optimization_opportunities(
353        &mut self,
354        measurements: &[EnergyMeasurement],
355    ) -> Result<()> {
356        self.optimization_opportunities.clear();
357
358        // Analyze recent measurements for patterns
359        let avg_utilization: f64 =
360            measurements.iter().map(|m| m.utilization).sum::<f64>() / measurements.len() as f64;
361        let avg_efficiency: f64 = measurements.iter().map(|m| m.efficiency_ratio).sum::<f64>()
362            / measurements.len() as f64;
363
364        // Add opportunities based on analysis
365        if avg_utilization < 0.7 {
366            self.optimization_opportunities.push(EfficiencyOpportunity {
367                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::HardwareUtilization,
368                description: "Improve GPU utilization".to_string(),
369                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 20.0,
370                potential_cost_savings_usd: 2.4,
371                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 8.0,
372                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::Medium,
373                confidence: 0.9,
374                recommendation: "Increase batch size or use pipeline parallelism".to_string(),
375            });
376        }
377
378        if avg_efficiency < 0.8 {
379            self.optimization_opportunities.push(EfficiencyOpportunity {
380                opportunity_type: EfficiencyType::TrainingOptimization,
381                description: "Optimize training algorithm".to_string(),
382                potential_energy_savings_kwh: 30.0,
383                potential_cost_savings_usd: 3.6,
384                potential_carbon_reduction_kg: 12.0,
385                implementation_effort: ImplementationEffort::High,
386                confidence: 0.8,
387                recommendation: "Implement gradient accumulation and mixed precision".to_string(),
388            });
389        }
390
391        info!(
392            "Updated optimization opportunities: {} found",
393            self.optimization_opportunities.len()
394        );
395        Ok(())
396    }
397}
398
399#[cfg(test)]
400mod tests {
401    use super::*;
402    use std::time::SystemTime;
403
404    #[test]
405    fn test_efficiency_analyzer_creation() {
406        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
407        assert_eq!(analyzer.optimization_opportunities.len(), 0);
408    }
409
410    #[tokio::test]
411    async fn test_efficiency_opportunities() {
412        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
413        let opportunities = analyzer.analyze_efficiency_opportunities().await.unwrap();
414
415        assert!(!opportunities.is_empty());
416        assert!(opportunities.iter().all(|o| o.potential_carbon_reduction_kg >= 0.0));
417        assert!(opportunities.iter().all(|o| o.confidence > 0.0 && o.confidence <= 1.0));
418    }
419
420    #[tokio::test]
421    async fn test_waste_detection() {
422        let mut analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
423        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
424            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
425            device_id: "test-gpu".to_string(),
426            power_watts: 300.0,
427            energy_kwh: 1.0,
428            utilization: 0.05,       // Very low utilization
429            temperature: Some(90.0), // High temperature
430            efficiency_ratio: 0.6,   // Low efficiency
431        };
432
433        let waste = analyzer.detect_energy_waste(&energy_measurement).await.unwrap();
434        assert!(!waste.is_empty());
435
436        // Should detect multiple waste types
437        let waste_types: Vec<_> = waste.iter().map(|w| &w.waste_type).collect();
438        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::IdleResources));
439        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::ThermalThrottling));
440        assert!(waste_types.contains(&&WasteType::InefficientAlgorithm));
441    }
442
443    #[tokio::test]
444    async fn test_session_efficiency_analysis() {
445        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
446        let session_info = SessionInfo {
447            session_id: "test".to_string(),
448            start_time: std::time::SystemTime::now(),
449            session_type: MeasurementType::Training,
450            duration_hours: 1.0,
451            workload_description: "transformer training".to_string(),
452            region: "US-West".to_string(),
453            estimated_energy_kwh: 2.0,
454        };
455
456        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
457            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
458            device_id: "test".to_string(),
459            power_watts: 500.0,
460            energy_kwh: 2.0,
461            utilization: 0.8,
462            temperature: Some(75.0),
463            efficiency_ratio: 0.85,
464        };
465
466        let analysis = analyzer
467            .analyze_session_efficiency(&session_info, &energy_measurement)
468            .await
469            .unwrap();
470        assert!(analysis.efficiency_score > 0.0);
471        assert!(analysis.waste_percentage >= 0.0);
472        assert!(!analysis.optimization_opportunities.is_empty());
473    }
474
475    #[tokio::test]
476    async fn test_bottleneck_identification() {
477        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
478        let energy_measurement = EnergyMeasurement {
479            timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
480            device_id: "test".to_string(),
481            power_watts: 400.0,
482            energy_kwh: 1.5,
483            utilization: 0.5,        // Low utilization
484            temperature: Some(85.0), // High temperature
485            efficiency_ratio: 0.6,   // Low efficiency
486        };
487
488        let bottlenecks =
489            analyzer.identify_efficiency_bottlenecks(&energy_measurement).await.unwrap();
490        assert!(!bottlenecks.is_empty());
491        assert!(bottlenecks.len() >= 3); // Should identify multiple bottlenecks
492    }
493
494    #[tokio::test]
495    async fn test_optimization_potential() {
496        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
497
498        let low_efficiency_potential =
499            analyzer.calculate_optimization_potential(0.5).await.unwrap();
500        let high_efficiency_potential =
501            analyzer.calculate_optimization_potential(0.9).await.unwrap();
502
503        assert!(low_efficiency_potential > high_efficiency_potential);
504        assert!(low_efficiency_potential <= 0.5); // Capped at 50%
505    }
506
507    #[tokio::test]
508    async fn test_model_optimization_recommendations() {
509        let analyzer = EfficiencyAnalyzer::new();
510        let recommendations = analyzer.get_model_optimization_recommendations().await.unwrap();
511
512        assert!(!recommendations.is_empty());
513        assert!(recommendations.iter().all(|r| r.potential_savings.energy_savings_kwh >= 0.0));
514        assert!(recommendations.iter().all(|r| r.potential_savings.carbon_reduction_kg >= 0.0));
515    }
516}