Crate tower_sessions

source ·
Expand description

§Overview

This crate provides sessions, key-value pairs associated with a site visitor, as a tower middleware.

It offers:

  • Pluggable Storage Backends: Bring your own backend simply by implementing the SessionStore trait, fully decoupling sessions from their storage.
  • Minimal Overhead: Sessions are only loaded from their backing stores when they’re actually used and only in e.g. the handler they’re used in. That means this middleware can be installed at any point in your route graph with minimal overhead.
  • An axum Extractor for Session: Applications built with axum can use Session as an extractor directly in their handlers. This makes using sessions as easy as including Session in your handler.
  • Simple Key-Value Interface: Sessions offer a key-value interface that supports native Rust types. So long as these types are Serialize and can be converted to JSON, it’s straightforward to insert, get, and remove any value.
  • Strongly-Typed Sessions: Strong typing guarantees are easy to layer on top of this foundational key-value interface.

This crate’s session implementation is inspired by the Django sessions middleware and it provides a transliteration of those semantics.

§Session stores

Session data persistence is managed by user-provided types that implement SessionStore. What this means is that applications can and should implement session stores to fit their specific needs.

That said, a number of session store implmentations already exist and may be useful starting points.

CratePersistentDescription
tower-sessions-dynamodb-storeYesDynamoDB session store
tower-sessions-firestore-storeYesFirestore session store
tower-sessions-libsql-storeYeslibSQL session store
tower-sessions-mongodb-storeYesMongoDB session store
tower-sessions-moka-storeNoMoka session store
tower-sessions-redis-storeYesRedis via fred session store
tower-sessions-rusqlite-storeYesRusqlite session store
tower-sessions-sled-storeYesSled session store
tower-sessions-sqlx-storeYesSQLite, Postgres, and MySQL session stores
tower-sessions-surrealdb-storeYesSurrealDB session store

Have a store to add? Please open a PR adding it.

§User session management

To facilitate authentication and authorization, we’ve built axum-login on top of this crate. Please check it out if you’re looking for a generalized auth solution.

§Usage with an axum application

A common use-case for sessions is when building HTTP servers. Using axum, it’s straightforward to leverage sessions.

use std::net::SocketAddr;

use axum::{response::IntoResponse, routing::get, Router};
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use time::Duration;
use tower_sessions::{Expiry, MemoryStore, Session, SessionManagerLayer};

const COUNTER_KEY: &str = "counter";

#[derive(Default, Deserialize, Serialize)]
struct Counter(usize);

async fn handler(session: Session) -> impl IntoResponse {
    let counter: Counter = session.get(COUNTER_KEY).await.unwrap().unwrap_or_default();
    session.insert(COUNTER_KEY, counter.0 + 1).await.unwrap();
    format!("Current count: {}", counter.0)
}

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
    let session_store = MemoryStore::default();
    let session_layer = SessionManagerLayer::new(session_store)
        .with_secure(false)
        .with_expiry(Expiry::OnInactivity(Duration::seconds(10)));

    let app = Router::new().route("/", get(handler)).layer(session_layer);

    let addr = SocketAddr::from(([127, 0, 0, 1], 3000));
    let listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(&addr).await.unwrap();
    axum::serve(listener, app.into_make_service())
        .await
        .unwrap();
}

§Session expiry management

In cases where you are utilizing stores that lack automatic session expiry functionality, such as SQLx or MongoDB stores, it becomes essential to periodically clean up stale sessions. For instance, both SQLx and MongoDB stores offer continuously_delete_expired which is designed to be executed as a recurring task. This process ensures the removal of expired sessions, maintaining your application’s data integrity and performance.

ⓘ
let pool = SqlitePool::connect("sqlite::memory:").await.unwrap();
let session_store = SqliteStore::new(pool);
let deletion_task = tokio::task::spawn(
    session_store
        .clone()
        .continuously_delete_expired(tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(60)),
);
deletion_task.await.unwrap().unwrap();

Note that by default or when using browser session expiration, sessions are considered expired after two weeks.

§Extractor pattern

When using axum, the Session will already function as an extractor. It’s possible to build further on this to create extractors of custom types.

const COUNTER_KEY: &str = "counter";

#[derive(Default, Deserialize, Serialize)]
struct Counter(usize);

#[async_trait]
impl<S> FromRequestParts<S> for Counter
where
    S: Send + Sync,
{
    type Rejection = (http::StatusCode, &'static str);

    async fn from_request_parts(req: &mut Parts, state: &S) -> Result<Self, Self::Rejection> {
        let session = Session::from_request_parts(req, state).await?;
        let counter: Counter = session.get(COUNTER_KEY).await.unwrap().unwrap_or_default();
        session.insert(COUNTER_KEY, counter.0 + 1).await.unwrap();

        Ok(counter)
    }
}

Now in our handler, we can use Counter directly to read its fields.

A complete example can be found in examples/counter-extractor.rs.

§Strongly-typed sessions

The extractor pattern can be extended further to provide strong typing guarantees over the key-value substrate. Whereas our previous extractor example was effectively read-only. This pattern enables mutability of the underlying structure while also leveraging the full power of the type system.

#[derive(Clone, Deserialize, Serialize)]
struct GuestData {
    pageviews: usize,
    first_seen: OffsetDateTime,
    last_seen: OffsetDateTime,
}

impl Default for GuestData {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self {
            pageviews: 0,
            first_seen: OffsetDateTime::now_utc(),
            last_seen: OffsetDateTime::now_utc(),
        }
    }
}

struct Guest {
    session: Session,
    guest_data: GuestData,
}

impl Guest {
    const GUEST_DATA_KEY: &'static str = "guest_data";

    fn first_seen(&self) -> OffsetDateTime {
        self.guest_data.first_seen
    }

    fn last_seen(&self) -> OffsetDateTime {
        self.guest_data.last_seen
    }

    fn pageviews(&self) -> usize {
        self.guest_data.pageviews
    }

    async fn mark_pageview(&mut self) {
        self.guest_data.pageviews += 1;
        Self::update_session(&self.session, &self.guest_data).await
    }

    async fn update_session(session: &Session, guest_data: &GuestData) {
        session
            .insert(Self::GUEST_DATA_KEY, guest_data.clone())
            .await
            .unwrap()
    }
}

#[async_trait]
impl<S> FromRequestParts<S> for Guest
where
    S: Send + Sync,
{
    type Rejection = (StatusCode, &'static str);

    async fn from_request_parts(req: &mut Parts, state: &S) -> Result<Self, Self::Rejection> {
        let session = Session::from_request_parts(req, state).await?;

        let mut guest_data: GuestData = session
            .get(Self::GUEST_DATA_KEY)
            .await
            .unwrap()
            .unwrap_or_default();

        guest_data.last_seen = OffsetDateTime::now_utc();

        Self::update_session(&session, &guest_data).await;

        Ok(Self {
            session,
            guest_data,
        })
    }
}

Here we can use Guest as an extractor in our handler. We’ll be able to read values, like the ID as well as update the pageview count with our mark_pageview method.

A complete example can be found in examples/strongly-typed.rs

§Name-spaced and strongly-typed buckets

Our example demonstrates a single extractor, but in a real application we might imagine a set of common extractors, all living in the same session. Each extractor forms a kind of bucketed name-space with a typed structure. Importantly, each is self-contained by its own name-space.

For instance, we might also have a site preferences bucket, an analytics bucket, a feature flag bucket and so on. All these together would live in the same session, but would be segmented by their own name-space, avoiding the mixing of domains unnecessarily.1

§Layered caching

In some cases, the canonical store for a session may benefit from a cache. For example, rather than loading a session from a store on every request, this roundtrip can be mitigated by placing a cache in front of the storage backend. A specialized session store, CachingSessionStore, is provided for exactly this purpose.

This store manages a cache and a store. Where the cache acts as a frontend and the store a backend. When a session is loaded, the store first attempts to load the session from the cache, if that fails only then does it try to load from the store. By doing so, read-heavy workloads will incur far fewer roundtrips to the store itself.

To illustrate, this is how we might use the MokaStore as a frontend cache to a PostgresStore backend.

ⓘ
let database_url = std::option_env!("DATABASE_URL").unwrap();
let pool = PgPool::connect(database_url).await.unwrap();

let postgres_store = PostgresStore::new(pool);
postgres_store.migrate().await.unwrap();

let moka_store = MokaStore::new(Some(10_000));
let caching_store = CachingSessionStore::new(moka_store, postgres_store);

let session_service = ServiceBuilder::new()
    .layer(SessionManagerLayer::new(caching_store).with_max_age(Duration::days(1)));

While this example uses Moka, any implementor of SessionStore may be used. For instance, we could use the RedisStore instead of Moka.

A cache is most helpful with read-heavy workloads, where the cache hit rate will be high. This is because write-heavy workloads will require a roundtrip to the store and therefore benefit less from caching.

§Data races under concurrent conditions

Please note that it is not safe to access and mutate session state concurrently: this will result in data loss if your mutations are dependent on the state of the session.

This is because a session is loaded first from its backing store. Once loaded it’s possible for a second request to load the same session, but without the inflight changes the first request may have made.

§Implementation

Sessions are composed of three pieces:

  1. A cookie that holds the session ID as its value,
  2. An in-memory hash-map, which underpins the key-value API,
  3. A pluggable persistence layer, the session store, where session data is housed.

Together, these pieces form the basis of this crate and allow tower and axum applications to use a familiar session interface.

Sessions manifest to clients as cookies. These cookies have a configurable name and a value that is the session ID. In other words, cookies hold a pointer to the session in the form of an ID. This ID is an i128 generated by the rand crate.

§Secure nature of cookies

Session IDs are considered secure if sent over encrypted channels. Note that this assumption is predicated on the secure nature of the rand crate and its ability to generate securely-random values using the ChaCha block cipher with 12 rounds. It’s also important to note that session cookies must never be sent over a public, insecure channel. Doing so is not secure and will lead to compromised sessions!

Additionally, sessions may be optionally signed or encrypted by enabling the signed and private feature flags, respectively. When enabled, the with_signed and with_private methods become available. These methods take a cryptographic key which allows the session manager to leverage ciphertext as opposed to the default of plaintext. Note that no data is stored in the session ID beyond the session identifier itself and so this measure should be considered primarily effective as a defense in depth tactic.

§Key-value API

Sessions manage a HashMap<String, serde_json::Value> but importantly are transparently persisted to an arbitrary storage backend. Effectively, HashMap is an intermediary, in-memory representation. By using a map-like structure, we’re able to present a familiar key-value interface for managing sessions. This allows us to store and retrieve native Rust types, so long as our type is impl Serialize and can be represented as JSON.2

Internally, this hash map state is protected by a lock in the form of Mutex. This allows us to safely share mutable state across thread boundaries. Note that this lock is only acquired when we read from or write to this inner session state and not used when the session is provided to the request. This means that lock contention is minimized for most use cases.3

§Session store

Sessions are serialized to arbitrary storage backends via a session record intermediary. Implementations of SessionStore take a record and persist it such that it can later be loaded via the session ID.

Three components are needed for storing a session:

  1. The session ID.
  2. The session expiry.
  3. The session data itself.

Together, these compose the session record and are enough to both encode and decode a session from any backend.

§Session life cycle

Cookies hold a pointer to the session, rather than the session’s data, and because of this, the tower middleware is focused on managing the process of initializing a session which can later be used in code to transparently interact with the store.

A session is initialized by looking for a cookie that matches the configured session cookie name. If no such cookie is found or a cookie is found but is malformed, an empty session is initialized.

Modified sessions will invoke the session’s save method as well as append to the Set-Cookie header of the response.

Empty sessions are considered deleted and will set a removal cookie on the response but are not removed from the store directly.

Sessions also carry with them a configurable expiry and will be removed in accordance with this.

Notably, the session life cycle minimizes overhead with the store. All session store methods are deferred until the point Session is used in code and more specifically one of its methods requiring the store is called.


  1. This is particularly useful when we may have data domains that only belong with ! users in certain states: we can pull these into our handlers where we need a particular domain. In this way, we minimize data pollution via self-contained domains in the form of buckets. â†©

  2. Using JSON allows us to translate arbitrary types to virtually any backend and gives us a nice interface with which to interact with the session. â†©

  3. We might consider replacing Mutex with RwLock if this proves to be a better fit in practice. Another alternative might be dashmap or a different approach entirely. Future iterations should be based on real-world use cases. â†©

Re-exports§

Modules§

  • A middleware that provides Session as a request extension.
  • A session which allows HTTP applications to associate data with visitors.
  • A session backend for managing session state.

Structs§

  • Provides a layered caching mechanism with a cache as the frontend and a store as the backend..
  • MemoryStorememory-store
    A session store that lives only in memory.
  • A session which allows HTTP applications to associate key-value pairs with visitors.

Enums§

  • Session expiry configuration.

Traits§