Skip to main content

torsh_jit/advisor/
performance.rs

1//! Performance analyzer for identifying bottlenecks and hotspots
2
3use crate::advisor::config::*;
4use crate::advisor::config::{BenchmarkResults, OperationTiming};
5use crate::{profiler::ProfilingSession, ComputationGraph, JitResult};
6use std::collections::HashMap;
7
8/// Performance analyzer for identifying bottlenecks and hotspots
9pub struct PerformanceAnalyzer;
10
11impl PerformanceAnalyzer {
12    pub fn new() -> Self {
13        Self
14    }
15
16    pub fn identify_bottlenecks(
17        &self,
18        benchmark_results: &BenchmarkResults,
19    ) -> JitResult<Vec<PerformanceBottleneck>> {
20        let mut bottlenecks = Vec::new();
21
22        // Analyze execution times to identify bottlenecks
23        for (operation, timing) in &benchmark_results.operation_timings {
24            if timing.average_duration.as_millis() > 100 {
25                bottlenecks.push(PerformanceBottleneck {
26                    bottleneck_type: BottleneckType::Computation,
27                    location: operation.clone(),
28                    severity: self.calculate_bottleneck_severity(timing),
29                    description: format!("Slow operation: {}", operation),
30                    suggested_fixes: vec![
31                        "Consider optimization or parallelization".to_string(),
32                        "Profile for hotspots within the operation".to_string(),
33                    ],
34                });
35            }
36        }
37
38        // Check memory usage patterns
39        if let Some(memory_stats) = &benchmark_results.memory_statistics {
40            if memory_stats.peak_usage > memory_stats.allocated * 2 {
41                bottlenecks.push(PerformanceBottleneck {
42                    bottleneck_type: BottleneckType::Memory,
43                    location: "Global".to_string(),
44                    severity: 0.8,
45                    description: "High memory overhead detected".to_string(),
46                    suggested_fixes: vec![
47                        "Reduce memory allocations".to_string(),
48                        "Implement memory pooling".to_string(),
49                    ],
50                });
51            }
52        }
53
54        Ok(bottlenecks)
55    }
56
57    pub fn identify_hotspots(
58        &self,
59        benchmark_results: &BenchmarkResults,
60    ) -> JitResult<Vec<PerformanceHotspot>> {
61        let mut hotspots = Vec::new();
62        let total_time: u64 = benchmark_results
63            .operation_timings
64            .values()
65            .map(|timing| timing.average_duration.as_millis() as u64)
66            .sum();
67
68        if total_time == 0 {
69            return Ok(hotspots);
70        }
71
72        for (operation, timing) in &benchmark_results.operation_timings {
73            let time_percent =
74                (timing.average_duration.as_millis() as f64 / total_time as f64) * 100.0;
75
76            if time_percent > 10.0 {
77                hotspots.push(PerformanceHotspot {
78                    location: operation.clone(),
79                    execution_time_percent: time_percent,
80                    memory_usage_percent: 0.0, // Would need memory profiling data
81                    frequency: timing.sample_count,
82                    optimization_potential: self.calculate_optimization_potential(time_percent),
83                });
84            }
85        }
86
87        Ok(hotspots)
88    }
89
90    pub fn analyze_profiling_data(
91        &self,
92        profiling_session: &ProfilingSession,
93    ) -> JitResult<ProfilingAnalysisResult> {
94        let mut bottlenecks = Vec::new();
95        let mut hotspots = Vec::new();
96
97        // Analyze function call frequencies
98        for (function, call_data) in profiling_session.function_calls() {
99            if call_data.total_time_ms > 50.0 {
100                bottlenecks.push(PerformanceBottleneck {
101                    bottleneck_type: if call_data.memory_allocations > 1000 {
102                        BottleneckType::Memory
103                    } else {
104                        BottleneckType::Computation
105                    },
106                    location: function.clone(),
107                    severity: (call_data.total_time_ms / 1000.0).min(1.0),
108                    description: format!("High-cost function: {}", function),
109                    suggested_fixes: vec!["Profile individual operations".to_string()],
110                });
111            }
112
113            let time_percent =
114                call_data.total_time_ms / profiling_session.total_duration_ms() * 100.0;
115            if time_percent > 5.0 {
116                hotspots.push(PerformanceHotspot {
117                    location: function.clone(),
118                    execution_time_percent: time_percent,
119                    memory_usage_percent: call_data.memory_allocations as f64
120                        / profiling_session.total_allocations() as f64
121                        * 100.0,
122                    frequency: call_data.call_count,
123                    optimization_potential: self.calculate_optimization_potential(time_percent),
124                });
125            }
126        }
127
128        Ok(ProfilingAnalysisResult {
129            bottlenecks,
130            hotspots,
131        })
132    }
133
134    pub fn analyze_scalability(&self, graph: &ComputationGraph) -> JitResult<ScalabilityAnalysis> {
135        let parallelization_potential = self.estimate_parallelization_potential(graph);
136        let memory_scalability = self.estimate_memory_scalability(graph);
137        let io_scalability = self.estimate_io_scalability(graph);
138        let algorithmic_complexity = self.analyze_algorithmic_complexity(graph);
139
140        Ok(ScalabilityAnalysis {
141            parallelization_potential,
142            memory_scalability,
143            io_scalability,
144            algorithmic_complexity,
145            bottleneck_scalability: HashMap::new(),
146        })
147    }
148
149    pub fn analyze_resource_utilization(
150        &self,
151        input: &AnalysisInput,
152    ) -> JitResult<ResourceUtilization> {
153        let mut cpu_usage = 0.5; // Default estimate
154        let mut memory_usage = 0.3;
155        let mut io_bandwidth_usage = 0.1;
156        let network_usage = 0.0;
157        let gpu_usage = None;
158
159        // Analyze based on available data
160        if let Some(benchmark_results) = &input.benchmark_results {
161            if let Some(resource_stats) = &benchmark_results.resource_usage {
162                cpu_usage = resource_stats.cpu_utilization;
163                memory_usage = resource_stats.memory_utilization;
164                io_bandwidth_usage = resource_stats.io_utilization;
165            }
166        }
167
168        if let Some(profiling_data) = &input.profiling_data {
169            // Adjust based on profiling data
170            cpu_usage = (cpu_usage + profiling_data.average_cpu_usage()) / 2.0;
171            memory_usage = (memory_usage
172                + profiling_data.peak_memory_usage() / profiling_data.available_memory())
173                / 2.0;
174        }
175
176        Ok(ResourceUtilization {
177            cpu_usage,
178            memory_usage,
179            io_bandwidth_usage,
180            network_usage,
181            gpu_usage,
182        })
183    }
184
185    pub fn create_execution_profile(&self, input: &AnalysisInput) -> JitResult<ExecutionProfile> {
186        let total_execution_time = input
187            .benchmark_results
188            .as_ref()
189            .map(|br| br.total_execution_time)
190            .unwrap_or_else(|| std::time::Duration::from_millis(1000));
191
192        let memory_peak_usage = input
193            .benchmark_results
194            .as_ref()
195            .and_then(|br| br.memory_statistics.as_ref())
196            .map(|ms| ms.peak_usage)
197            .unwrap_or(1024 * 1024); // 1MB default
198
199        let cpu_utilization = input
200            .profiling_data
201            .as_ref()
202            .map(|pd| pd.average_cpu_usage())
203            .unwrap_or(0.5);
204
205        Ok(ExecutionProfile {
206            total_execution_time,
207            memory_peak_usage,
208            cpu_utilization,
209            io_operations: 0,     // Would need I/O profiling
210            cache_miss_rate: 0.1, // Default estimate
211        })
212    }
213
214    pub fn calculate_confidence(&self, input: &AnalysisInput) -> f64 {
215        let mut confidence: f64 = 0.5; // Base confidence
216
217        if input.benchmark_results.is_some() {
218            confidence += 0.2;
219        }
220
221        if input.profiling_data.is_some() {
222            confidence += 0.2;
223        }
224
225        if input.computation_graph.is_some() {
226            confidence += 0.1;
227        }
228
229        confidence.min(1.0f64)
230    }
231
232    // Helper methods
233    fn calculate_bottleneck_severity(&self, timing: &OperationTiming) -> f64 {
234        let baseline_ms = 10.0; // 10ms baseline
235        let actual_ms = timing.average_duration.as_millis() as f64;
236        (actual_ms / baseline_ms).min(1.0)
237    }
238
239    fn calculate_optimization_potential(&self, time_percent: f64) -> f64 {
240        // Higher time percentage means higher optimization potential
241        (time_percent / 100.0).min(1.0)
242    }
243
244    fn estimate_parallelization_potential(&self, _graph: &ComputationGraph) -> f64 {
245        // Simplified estimate
246        0.6
247    }
248
249    fn estimate_memory_scalability(&self, _graph: &ComputationGraph) -> f64 {
250        // Simplified estimate
251        0.7
252    }
253
254    fn estimate_io_scalability(&self, _graph: &ComputationGraph) -> f64 {
255        // Simplified estimate
256        0.5
257    }
258
259    fn analyze_algorithmic_complexity(&self, graph: &ComputationGraph) -> String {
260        let node_count = graph.node_count();
261        match node_count {
262            0..=10 => "O(1)".to_string(),
263            11..=100 => "O(n)".to_string(),
264            101..=1000 => "O(n log n)".to_string(),
265            _ => "O(n²)".to_string(),
266        }
267    }
268}
269
270/// Result of profiling data analysis
271#[derive(Debug)]
272pub struct ProfilingAnalysisResult {
273    pub bottlenecks: Vec<PerformanceBottleneck>,
274    pub hotspots: Vec<PerformanceHotspot>,
275}
276
277// Helper types for function call data
278#[derive(Debug)]
279pub struct FunctionCallData {
280    pub total_time_ms: f64,
281    pub call_count: usize,
282    pub memory_allocations: usize,
283}
284
285impl ProfilingSession {
286    pub fn function_calls(&self) -> &HashMap<String, FunctionCallData> {
287        // Implementation would depend on actual ProfilingSession structure
288        static EMPTY: std::sync::LazyLock<HashMap<String, FunctionCallData>> =
289            std::sync::LazyLock::new(HashMap::new);
290        &EMPTY
291    }
292
293    pub fn total_duration_ms(&self) -> f64 {
294        // Implementation would depend on actual ProfilingSession structure
295        1000.0
296    }
297
298    pub fn total_allocations(&self) -> usize {
299        // Implementation would depend on actual ProfilingSession structure
300        1000
301    }
302
303    pub fn average_cpu_usage(&self) -> f64 {
304        // Implementation would depend on actual ProfilingSession structure
305        0.5
306    }
307
308    pub fn peak_memory_usage(&self) -> f64 {
309        // Implementation would depend on actual ProfilingSession structure
310        1024.0 * 1024.0
311    }
312
313    pub fn available_memory(&self) -> f64 {
314        // Implementation would depend on actual ProfilingSession structure
315        8.0 * 1024.0 * 1024.0 * 1024.0
316    }
317}