Crate strict_result

source ·
Expand description

The ? operator on Result has an implicit .into() on the error type, to make it easier to upcast errors into broader error types. This however can sometimes cause problems for type inference in highly generic contexts, since it effectively turns into .into().into(), which is ambiguous. To combat this, this crate defines a separate .strict()? operator, which does not perform this implicit .into().

For an example, let’s define a simple generic function:

fn passthrough<T>(f: impl FnOnce() -> T) -> T {
    f()
}

If we try to use this combined with the ? operator, we will get an error because the generic <T> cannot be determined.

passthrough(|| {
    std::fs::create_dir("example")?;
    Ok(()) // cannot infer type of the type parameter `E` declared on the enum `Result`
})?;

In this case we can use .strict()? to require that the error type is equal to the outer one.

use strict_result::Strict;

passthrough(|| {
    std::fs::create_dir("example")?;
    Ok(())
}).strict()?;

This crate uses the try_trait_v2 feature, and thus requires nightly.

Structs

  • A wrapper around Result that suppresses the implicit .into() when using the ? operator.

Traits

  • Provides the .strict()? function.