sp1_recursion_circuit/basefold/

mod.rs

use crate::{
    challenger::{CanObserveVariable, CanSampleBitsVariable, FieldChallengerVariable},
    hash::FieldHasherVariable,
    symbolic::IntoSymbolic,
    CircuitConfig, SP1FieldConfigVariable,
};
use itertools::Itertools;
use slop_algebra::{AbstractField, TwoAdicField};
use slop_basefold::{FriConfig, BATCH_GRINDING_BITS};
use slop_multilinear::{partial_lagrange_blocking, MleEval, Point};
use sp1_recursion_compiler::{
    circuit::CircuitV2Builder,
    ir::{Builder, DslIr, Ext, Felt, SymbolicExt},
};

use sp1_primitives::{SP1ExtensionField, SP1Field};
use sp1_recursion_executor::D;
use std::{iter::once, marker::PhantomData};
use tcs::{RecursiveMerkleTreeTcs, RecursiveTensorCsOpening};
pub mod merkle_tree;
pub mod stacked;
pub mod tcs;
mod whir;
pub mod witness;

pub struct RecursiveBasefoldConfigImpl<C, SC>(PhantomData<(C, SC)>);

pub struct RecursiveBasefoldProof<C: CircuitConfig, SC: SP1FieldConfigVariable<C>> {
    /// The univariate polynomials that are used in the sumcheck part of the BaseFold protocol.
    pub univariate_messages: Vec<[Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>; 2]>,
    /// The FRI parts of the proof.
    /// The commitments to the folded polynomials produced in the commit phase.
    pub fri_commitments: Vec<<SC as FieldHasherVariable<C>>::DigestVariable>,
    /// The query openings for the individual multilinear polynomials.
    /// The vector is indexed by the batch number.
    pub component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs:
        Vec<RecursiveTensorCsOpening<<SC as FieldHasherVariable<C>>::DigestVariable>>,
    /// The query openings and the FRI query proofs for the FRI query phase.
    pub query_phase_openings_and_proofs:
        Vec<RecursiveTensorCsOpening<<SC as FieldHasherVariable<C>>::DigestVariable>>,
    /// The prover performs FRI until we reach a polynomial of degree 0, and return the constant
    /// value of this polynomial.
    pub final_poly: Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>,
    /// Proof-of-work witness.
    pub pow_witness: Felt<SP1Field>,
    /// Batch grinding witness.
    pub batch_grinding_witness: Felt<SP1Field>,
}

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct RecursiveBasefoldVerifier<C: CircuitConfig, SC: SP1FieldConfigVariable<C>> {
    pub fri_config: FriConfig<SP1Field>,
    pub tcs: RecursiveMerkleTreeTcs<C, SC>,
}

pub trait RecursiveMultilinearPcsVerifier: Sized {
    type Commitment;
    type Proof;
    type Circuit: CircuitConfig<Bit = Self::Bit>;
    type Bit;
    type Challenger: FieldChallengerVariable<Self::Circuit, Self::Bit>;

    fn verify_trusted_evaluations(
        &self,
        builder: &mut Builder<Self::Circuit>,
        commitments: &[Self::Commitment],
        point: Point<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>,
        evaluation_claims: &[MleEval<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>],
        proof: &Self::Proof,
        challenger: &mut Self::Challenger,
    );

    fn verify_untrusted_evaluations(
        &self,
        builder: &mut Builder<Self::Circuit>,
        commitments: &[Self::Commitment],
        point: Point<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>,
        evaluation_claims: &[MleEval<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>],
        proof: &Self::Proof,
        challenger: &mut Self::Challenger,
    ) {
        for round in evaluation_claims.iter() {
            for evaluation in round.iter() {
                let evaluation_felts = Self::Circuit::ext2felt(builder, *evaluation);
                evaluation_felts.iter().for_each(|felt| challenger.observe(builder, *felt));
            }
        }
        self.verify_trusted_evaluations(
            builder,
            commitments,
            point,
            evaluation_claims,
            proof,
            challenger,
        )
    }
}

impl<C: CircuitConfig, SC: SP1FieldConfigVariable<C>> RecursiveMultilinearPcsVerifier
    for RecursiveBasefoldVerifier<C, SC>
{
    type Commitment = SC::DigestVariable;
    type Proof = RecursiveBasefoldProof<C, SC>;
    type Circuit = C;
    type Bit = C::Bit;
    type Challenger = SC::FriChallengerVariable;

    fn verify_trusted_evaluations(
        &self,
        builder: &mut Builder<Self::Circuit>,
        commitments: &[Self::Commitment],
        point: Point<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>,
        evaluation_claims: &[MleEval<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>],
        proof: &Self::Proof,
        challenger: &mut Self::Challenger,
    ) {
        self.verify_mle_evaluations(
            builder,
            commitments,
            point,
            evaluation_claims,
            proof,
            challenger,
        )
    }
}

impl<C: CircuitConfig, SC: SP1FieldConfigVariable<C>> RecursiveBasefoldVerifier<C, SC> {
    fn verify_mle_evaluations(
        &self,
        builder: &mut Builder<C>,
        commitments: &[SC::DigestVariable],
        mut point: Point<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>,
        evaluation_claims: &[MleEval<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>],
        proof: &RecursiveBasefoldProof<C, SC>,
        challenger: &mut SC::FriChallengerVariable,
    ) {
        // Check batch grinding witness.
        challenger.check_witness(builder, BATCH_GRINDING_BITS, proof.batch_grinding_witness);

        // Sample batching coefficients via partial Lagrange basis.
        let total_len = evaluation_claims
            .iter()
            .map(|batch_claims| batch_claims.num_polynomials())
            .sum::<usize>();
        let num_batching_variables = total_len.next_power_of_two().ilog2();
        let batching_point: Point<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>> =
            Point::from_iter((0..num_batching_variables).map(|_| challenger.sample_ext(builder)));
        let batching_point_symbolic = IntoSymbolic::<C>::as_symbolic(&batching_point);
        let batching_coefficients_symbolic =
            partial_lagrange_blocking(&batching_point_symbolic).into_buffer().into_vec();

        // Force modular reduction the batching coefficients since they are used repeatedly later on
        // which would save redundant reductions in the later computations.
        let batching_coefficients: Vec<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>> =
            batching_coefficients_symbolic
                .into_iter()
                .map(|x| {
                    let element = x.as_ext().expect("lagrange coefficient should be a variable");
                    builder.reduce_e(element);
                    element
                })
                .collect();

        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_enter("compute eval_claim");
        // Compute the batched evaluation claim.
        let eval_claim = evaluation_claims
            .iter()
            .flat_map(|batch_claims| batch_claims.iter())
            .zip(batching_coefficients.iter())
            .map(|(eval, batch_power)| *eval * *batch_power)
            .sum::<SymbolicExt<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>();
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_exit();

        // Assert correctness of shape.
        assert_eq!(
            proof.fri_commitments.len(),
            proof.univariate_messages.len(),
            "Sumcheck FRI Length Mismatch"
        );

        // The prover messages correspond to fixing the last coordinate first, so we reverse the
        // underlying point for the verification.
        point.reverse();

        // Sample the challenges used for FRI folding and BaseFold random linear combinations.
        let len_felt: Felt<_> =
            builder.constant(SP1Field::from_canonical_usize(proof.fri_commitments.len()));
        challenger.observe(builder, len_felt);
        let betas = proof
            .fri_commitments
            .iter()
            .zip(proof.univariate_messages.iter())
            .map(|(commitment, poly)| {
                poly.iter().copied().for_each(|x| {
                    let x_felts = C::ext2felt(builder, x);
                    x_felts.iter().for_each(|felt| challenger.observe(builder, *felt));
                });
                challenger.observe(builder, *commitment);
                challenger.sample_ext(builder)
            })
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();

        // Check the consistency of the first univariate message with the claimed evaluation. The
        // first_poly is supposed to be `vals(X_0, X_1, ..., X_{d-1}, 0), vals(X_0, X_1, ...,
        // X_{d-1}, 1)`. Given this, the claimed evaluation should be `(1 - X_d) *
        // first_poly[0] + X_d * first_poly[1]`.
        let first_poly = proof.univariate_messages[0];
        let one: Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField> = builder.constant(SP1ExtensionField::one());

        builder.assert_ext_eq(
            eval_claim,
            (one - *point[0]) * first_poly[0] + *point[0] * first_poly[1],
        );

        // Fold the two messages into a single evaluation claim for the next round, using the
        // sampled randomness.
        let mut expected_eval = first_poly[0] + betas[0] * first_poly[1];

        // Check round-by-round consistency between the successive sumcheck univariate messages.
        for (i, (poly, beta)) in
            proof.univariate_messages[1..].iter().zip(betas[1..].iter()).enumerate()
        {
            // The check is similar to the one for `first_poly`.
            let i = i + 1;
            builder.assert_ext_eq(expected_eval, (one - *point[i]) * poly[0] + *point[i] * poly[1]);

            // Fold the two pieces of the message.
            expected_eval = poly[0] + *beta * poly[1];
        }

        let final_poly_felts = C::ext2felt(builder, proof.final_poly);
        challenger.observe_slice(builder, final_poly_felts);

        // Check proof of work (grinding to find a number that hashes to have
        // `self.config.proof_of_work_bits` zeroes at the beginning).
        challenger.check_witness(builder, self.fri_config.proof_of_work_bits, proof.pow_witness);

        let log_len = proof.fri_commitments.len();

        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_enter("sample query_indices");
        // Sample query indices for the FRI query IOPP part of BaseFold. This part is very similar
        // to the corresponding part in the univariate FRI verifier.
        let query_indices = (0..self.fri_config.num_queries)
            .map(|_| challenger.sample_bits(builder, log_len + self.fri_config.log_blowup()))
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_exit();

        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_enter("compute batch_evals");

        // Compute the batch evaluations from the openings of the component polynomials.
        let zero = SymbolicExt::<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>::zero();
        let mut batch_evals = vec![zero; query_indices.len()];
        let mut batch_idx = 0;
        for opening in proof.component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs.iter() {
            let values = &opening.values;
            let total_columns = values.get(0).unwrap().as_slice().len();
            let round_coefficients = &batching_coefficients[batch_idx..batch_idx + total_columns];
            for (batch_eval, values) in batch_evals.iter_mut().zip_eq(values.split()) {
                for (value, coeff) in values.as_slice().iter().zip(round_coefficients.iter()) {
                    *batch_eval += *coeff * *value;
                }
            }
            batch_idx += total_columns;
        }
        let batch_evals: Vec<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>> =
            batch_evals.into_iter().map(|x| builder.eval(x)).collect_vec();
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_exit();

        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_enter("verify_tensor_openings");

        // Verify the proof of the claimed values.
        for (commit, opening) in
            commitments.iter().zip_eq(proof.component_polynomials_query_openings_and_proofs.iter())
        {
            RecursiveMerkleTreeTcs::<C, SC>::verify_tensor_openings(
                builder,
                commit,
                &query_indices,
                opening,
            );
        }
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_exit();

        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_enter("verify_queries");
        // Check that the query openings are consistent as FRI messages.
        self.verify_queries(
            builder,
            &proof.fri_commitments,
            &query_indices,
            proof.final_poly,
            batch_evals,
            &proof.query_phase_openings_and_proofs,
            &betas,
        );
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_exit();

        // The final consistency check between the FRI messages and the partial evaluation messages.
        builder.assert_ext_eq(
            proof.final_poly,
            proof.univariate_messages.last().unwrap()[0]
                + *betas.last().unwrap() * proof.univariate_messages.last().unwrap()[1],
        );
    }

    /// The FRI verifier for a single query. We modify this from Plonky3 to be compatible with
    /// opening only a single vector.
    #[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
    fn verify_queries(
        &self,
        builder: &mut Builder<C>,
        commitments: &[SC::DigestVariable],
        indices: &[Vec<C::Bit>],
        final_poly: Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>,
        reduced_openings: Vec<Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>>,
        query_openings: &[RecursiveTensorCsOpening<SC::DigestVariable>],
        betas: &[Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>],
    ) {
        let log_max_height = commitments.len() + self.fri_config.log_blowup();

        let mut folded_evals = reduced_openings;
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_enter("compute exp reverse bits");
        let mut xis: Vec<Felt<SP1Field>> = indices
            .iter()
            .map(|index| {
                let two_adic_generator: Felt<SP1Field> =
                    builder.constant(SP1Field::two_adic_generator(log_max_height));
                C::exp_reverse_bits(builder, two_adic_generator, index.to_vec())
            })
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();
        builder.cycle_tracker_v2_exit();

        let mut indices = indices.to_vec();

        // Loop over the FRI queries.
        for ((commitment, query_opening), beta) in
            commitments.iter().zip_eq(query_openings.iter()).zip_eq(betas)
        {
            let openings = &query_opening.values;

            for (((index, folded_eval), opening), x) in indices
                .iter_mut()
                .zip_eq(folded_evals.iter_mut())
                .zip_eq(openings.split())
                .zip_eq(xis.iter_mut())
            {
                let index_sibling_complement = index[0];
                let index_pair = &index[1..];

                builder.reduce_e(*folded_eval);

                let evals: [Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField>; 2] = opening
                    .as_slice()
                    .chunks_exact(D)
                    .map(|slice| {
                        let reconstructed_ext: Ext<SP1Field, SP1ExtensionField> =
                            C::felt2ext(builder, slice.try_into().unwrap());
                        reconstructed_ext
                    })
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
                    .try_into()
                    .unwrap();

                let eval_ordered = C::select_chain_ef(
                    builder,
                    index_sibling_complement,
                    once(evals[0]),
                    once(evals[1]),
                );

                // Check that the folded evaluation is consistent with the FRI query proof opening.
                builder.assert_ext_eq(eval_ordered[0], *folded_eval);

                let xs_new = builder.eval((*x) * SP1Field::two_adic_generator(1));
                let xs =
                    C::select_chain_f(builder, index_sibling_complement, once(*x), once(xs_new));

                // interpolate and evaluate at beta
                let temp_1: Felt<_> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::SubF(temp_1, xs[1], xs[0]));

                // let temp_2 = evals_ext[1] - evals_ext[0];
                let temp_2: Ext<_, _> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::SubE(temp_2, evals[1], evals[0]));

                // let temp_3 = temp_2 / temp_1;
                let temp_3: Ext<_, _> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::DivEF(temp_3, temp_2, temp_1));

                // let temp_4 = beta - xs[0];
                let temp_4: Ext<_, _> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::SubEF(temp_4, *beta, xs[0]));

                // let temp_5 = temp_4 * temp_3;
                let temp_5: Ext<_, _> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::MulE(temp_5, temp_4, temp_3));

                // let temp6 = evals_ext[0] + temp_5;
                let temp_6: Ext<_, _> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::AddE(temp_6, evals[0], temp_5));
                *folded_eval = temp_6;

                // let temp_7 = x * x;
                let temp_7: Felt<_> = builder.uninit();
                builder.push_op(DslIr::MulF(temp_7, *x, *x));
                *x = temp_7;

                *index = index_pair.to_vec();
            }
            // Check that the opening is consistent with the commitment.
            RecursiveMerkleTreeTcs::<C, SC>::verify_tensor_openings(
                builder,
                commitment,
                &indices,
                query_opening,
            );
        }

        for folded_eval in folded_evals {
            builder.assert_ext_eq(folded_eval, final_poly);
        }
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use rand::thread_rng;
    use slop_commit::Message;
    use sp1_recursion_compiler::{circuit::AsmConfig, config::InnerConfig};
    use std::sync::Arc;

    use slop_algebra::extension::BinomialExtensionField;
    use slop_challenger::IopCtx;
    use sp1_primitives::SP1DiffusionMatrix;

    use crate::{challenger::DuplexChallengerVariable, witness::Witnessable};

    use super::*;
    use slop_basefold::BasefoldVerifier;
    use slop_basefold_prover::BasefoldProver;
    use slop_challenger::CanObserve;

    use slop_commit::Rounds;

    use slop_multilinear::{Evaluations, Mle};
    use sp1_hypercube::inner_perm;
    use sp1_primitives::{SP1Field, SP1GlobalContext};
    use sp1_recursion_compiler::circuit::{AsmBuilder, AsmCompiler};
    use sp1_recursion_executor::Executor;

    type F = SP1Field;
    type EF = BinomialExtensionField<SP1Field, 4>;

    #[test]
    fn test_basefold_proof() {
        type C = InnerConfig;
        type SC = SP1GlobalContext;

        type Prover = BasefoldProver<SP1GlobalContext, sp1_hypercube::prover::SP1MerkleTreeProver>;

        let num_variables = 16;
        let round_widths = [vec![16, 10, 14], vec![20, 78, 34], vec![10, 10]];

        let mut rng = thread_rng();
        let round_mles = round_widths
            .iter()
            .map(|widths| {
                widths
                    .iter()
                    .map(|&w| Mle::<SP1Field>::rand(&mut rng, w, num_variables))
                    .collect::<Message<_>>()
            })
            .collect::<Rounds<_>>();

        let verifier =
            BasefoldVerifier::<_>::new(FriConfig::default_fri_config(), round_widths.len());
        let recursive_verifier = RecursiveBasefoldVerifier::<C, SC> {
            fri_config: verifier.fri_config,
            tcs: RecursiveMerkleTreeTcs::<C, SC>(PhantomData),
        };

        let prover = Prover::new(&verifier);

        let mut challenger = SC::default_challenger();
        let mut commitments = vec![];
        let mut prover_data = Rounds::new();
        let mut eval_claims = Rounds::new();
        let point = Point::<EF>::rand(&mut rng, num_variables);
        for mles in round_mles.iter() {
            let (commitment, data) = prover.commit_mles(mles.clone()).unwrap();
            challenger.observe(commitment);
            commitments.push(commitment);
            prover_data.push(data);
            let evaluations =
                mles.iter().map(|mle| mle.eval_at(&point)).collect::<Evaluations<_>>();
            eval_claims.push(evaluations);
        }

        let proof = prover
            .prove_trusted_mle_evaluations(
                point.clone(),
                round_mles,
                eval_claims.clone(),
                prover_data,
                &mut challenger,
            )
            .unwrap();

        let mut builder = AsmBuilder::default();
        let mut witness_stream = Vec::new();
        let mut challenger_variable = DuplexChallengerVariable::new(&mut builder);
        let eval_claims = eval_claims
            .iter()
            .map(|round| round.into_iter().flat_map(|x| x.into_iter()).collect::<MleEval<_>>())
            .collect::<Rounds<_>>();

        for commitment in commitments.iter() {
            challenger.observe(*commitment);
        }

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&commitments, &mut witness_stream);
        let commitments = commitments.read(&mut builder);

        for commitment in commitments.iter() {
            challenger_variable.observe(&mut builder, *commitment);
        }

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&point, &mut witness_stream);
        let point = point.read(&mut builder);

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&eval_claims, &mut witness_stream);
        let eval_claims = eval_claims.read(&mut builder);

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&proof, &mut witness_stream);
        let proof = proof.read(&mut builder);

        RecursiveBasefoldVerifier::<C, SC>::verify_mle_evaluations(
            &recursive_verifier,
            &mut builder,
            &commitments,
            point,
            &eval_claims,
            &proof,
            &mut challenger_variable,
        );
        let block = builder.into_root_block();
        let mut compiler = AsmCompiler::default();
        let program = Arc::new(compiler.compile_inner(block).validate().unwrap());
        let mut executor =
            Executor::<F, EF, SP1DiffusionMatrix>::new(program.clone(), inner_perm());
        executor.witness_stream = witness_stream.into();
        executor.run().unwrap();
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_invalid_basefold_proof() {
        type C = InnerConfig;
        type SC = SP1GlobalContext;
        type Prover = BasefoldProver<SP1GlobalContext, sp1_hypercube::prover::SP1MerkleTreeProver>;

        let num_variables = 16;
        let round_widths = [vec![16, 10, 14], vec![20, 78, 34], vec![10, 10]];
        let fri_config = FriConfig::default_fri_config();

        let mut rng = thread_rng();
        let round_mles = round_widths
            .iter()
            .map(|widths| {
                widths
                    .iter()
                    .map(|&w| Mle::<SP1Field>::rand(&mut rng, w, num_variables))
                    .collect::<Message<_>>()
            })
            .collect::<Rounds<_>>();

        let verifier = BasefoldVerifier::<SC>::new(fri_config, round_widths.len());
        let recursive_verifier = RecursiveBasefoldVerifier::<C, SC> {
            fri_config: verifier.fri_config,
            tcs: RecursiveMerkleTreeTcs::<C, SC>(PhantomData),
        };

        let prover = Prover::new(&verifier);

        let mut challenger = SC::default_challenger();
        let mut commitments = vec![];
        let mut prover_data = Rounds::new();
        let mut eval_claims = Rounds::new();
        let point = Point::<EF>::rand(&mut rng, num_variables);
        for mles in round_mles.iter() {
            let (commitment, data) = prover.commit_mles(mles.clone()).unwrap();
            challenger.observe(commitment);
            commitments.push(commitment);
            prover_data.push(data);
            let evaluations =
                mles.iter().map(|mle| mle.eval_at(&point)).collect::<Evaluations<_>>();
            eval_claims.push(evaluations);
        }

        let proof = prover
            .prove_trusted_mle_evaluations(
                point.clone(),
                round_mles,
                eval_claims.clone(),
                prover_data,
                &mut challenger,
            )
            .unwrap();

        // Make a new point that is different from the original point.
        let point = Point::<EF>::rand(&mut rng, num_variables);

        let mut builder = AsmBuilder::default();
        let mut witness_stream = Vec::new();
        let mut challenger_variable = DuplexChallengerVariable::new(&mut builder);

        for commitment in commitments.iter() {
            challenger.observe(*commitment);
        }

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&commitments, &mut witness_stream);
        let commitments = commitments.read(&mut builder);

        for commitment in commitments.iter() {
            challenger_variable.observe(&mut builder, *commitment);
        }

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&point, &mut witness_stream);
        let point = point.read(&mut builder);

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&eval_claims, &mut witness_stream);
        let eval_claims = eval_claims.read(&mut builder);

        Witnessable::<AsmConfig>::write(&proof, &mut witness_stream);
        let proof = proof.read(&mut builder);

        let eval_claims = eval_claims
            .iter()
            .map(|round| {
                round.into_iter().flat_map(|x| x.into_iter()).copied().collect::<MleEval<_>>()
            })
            .collect::<Rounds<_>>();

        RecursiveBasefoldVerifier::<C, SC>::verify_mle_evaluations(
            &recursive_verifier,
            &mut builder,
            &commitments,
            point,
            &eval_claims,
            &proof,
            &mut challenger_variable,
        );
        let block = builder.into_root_block();
        let mut compiler = AsmCompiler::default();
        let program = Arc::new(compiler.compile_inner(block).validate().unwrap());
        let mut executor =
            Executor::<F, EF, SP1DiffusionMatrix>::new(program.clone(), inner_perm());
        executor.witness_stream = witness_stream.into();
        executor.run().expect_err("invalid proof should not be verified");
    }
}