Expand description
E4 – Experimental Module Validation & Retention Criteria
This module documents which experimental methods remain gated behind feature flags and the criteria required for eventual promotion to core.
§Promoted to Core (E3)
| Module | Core path | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| EEQ charges | charges_eeq | Topology-free partial charges, O(N²), validated vs Gasteiger |
| D4 dispersion | dispersion | BJ-damped DFT-D4 energy, complements UFF/MMFF94 |
| ALPB solvation | solvation_alpb | Klamt-corrected solvation, improves over plain GB |
| sTDA UV-Vis | spectroscopy::stda_uvvis | CIS-like excitations from monopole charges, ~1000× faster than full CI |
| GIAO NMR | spectroscopy::giao_nmr | Multi-nucleus NMR shieldings, complements empirical HOSE |
§Retained as Experimental (E4)
§EXP-201: Kernel Polynomial Method (KPM)
Feature flag: experimental-kpm
Location: experimental/kpm/ (chebyshev.rs, density.rs)
KPM approximates the density of states via Chebyshev expansion of the spectral function. Useful for very large systems (10k+ atoms) but the current implementation lacks:
- Adaptive polynomial order selection
- Sparse-matrix backend for O(N) scaling
- Benchmarks against direct diagonalization for <500 atoms
Promotion criteria:
- Demonstrate wall-clock advantage over direct DOS for >2000 atoms
- Validate spectral accuracy within 0.1 eV of full diagonalization
- Add sparse matrix support (nalgebra-sparse or sprs)
§EXP-202: Multi-Basin Hopping (MBH)
Feature flag: experimental-mbh
Location: experimental/mbh/ (blocks.rs, hessian.rs)
Block-diagonal Hessian approach for exploring conformational basins. Intended for global optimization of flexible molecules.
Current limitations:
- No energy evaluator integration (needs UFF/MMFF94 coupling)
- Block decomposition heuristic is molecule-size dependent
- Missing Metropolis acceptance criterion
Promotion criteria:
- Integrate with
forcefieldmodule for energy evaluation - Reproduce known global minima for test molecules (alanine dipeptide, etc.)
- Compare basin-hopping yield vs multi-seed ETKDG
§EXP-203: Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra (RandNLA)
Feature flag: experimental-randnla
Location: experimental/rand_nla/ (nystrom.rs, solver.rs)
Nyström approximation and randomized eigensolvers for large overlap/Fock matrices. Currently a backend alternative, not a user-facing feature.
Current limitations:
- Rank selection requires manual tuning
- No automatic accuracy estimation
- Not yet wired into SCF or EHT solvers
Promotion criteria:
- Wire into EHT/SCF as optional backend with feature flag
- Show <1% error in eigenvalues for rank = N/4
- Demonstrate speedup for N>500 basis functions
§EXP-204: Spectral Dimensionality Reduction (SDR)
Feature flag: experimental-sdr
Location: experimental/sdr/ (embedding.rs, projections.rs)
Diffusion-map and spectral embedding for chemical space visualization. Alternative to fingerprint-based Tanimoto similarity.
Current limitations:
- Kernel bandwidth selection is fixed
- No out-of-sample extension (Nyström embedding)
- Limited to datasets fitting in memory
Promotion criteria:
- Validate embeddings preserve known SAR relationships
- Add adaptive bandwidth selection
- Compare clustering quality vs Butina (Tanimoto)
§EXP-205a: Conformal Geometric Algebra (CGA)
Feature flag: experimental-cga
Location: experimental/cga/ (multivector.rs, motor.rs, conformer.rs, materials.rs)
CGA representation of molecular geometry: motors for rigid transforms, conformal points for distance geometry. Research-stage alternative to Cartesian coordinate manipulation.
Current limitations:
- 5D multivector operations have overhead vs 3D rotations
- Conformer pipeline not competitive with ETKDG
- Materials assembly untested with real MOF structures
Promotion criteria:
- Demonstrate advantage in distance geometry constraint handling
- Benchmark CGA conformer vs ETKDG quality and speed
- Show utility for symmetry-constrained crystal assembly
§EXP-205b: Growing String Method (GSM)
Feature flag: experimental-gsm
Location: experimental/gsm/ (string.rs, saddle.rs)
Reaction path finding via growing string interpolation between reactant and product geometries. Identifies transition states.
Current limitations:
- No gradient source (needs coupled PES evaluation)
- String convergence criteria incomplete
- Saddle point refinement not validated
Promotion criteria:
- Couple with PM3 or xTB gradient evaluation
- Reproduce known barrier heights (SN2, Diels-Alder)
- Compare path energy profiles vs NEB reference
§EXP-205c: Continuous Phase Methods (CPM)
Feature flag: experimental-cpm
Location: experimental/cpm/ (surface.rs, grand_potential.rs)
Phase-field and grand potential methods for crystal surface thermodynamics and phase boundary determination.
Current limitations:
- Grand potential formulation needs thermodynamic data
- Surface energy calculations untested for ternary systems
- No integration with
materialsmodule
Promotion criteria:
- Validate surface energies against DFT reference for binary alloys
- Integrate with
materials::UnitCellfor consistent crystal handling - Add Wulff construction for equilibrium crystal shapes