runner_manager_platform/logging.rs
1// owner: d1-platform-core
2
3//! The structured log sink, and the redaction that is not optional.
4//!
5//! `07-security.md`'s threat table, on *"Logs disclose repository secrets"*:
6//! **"Structured allowlist logging with unconditional redaction of tokens,
7//! headers, JIT blobs, and paths."** Its security gate is a *secret-injection
8//! log scan*, and its release gate is that *"the user access token and the
9//! encoded JIT configuration are absent from logs, databases, snapshots, crash
10//! reports, and CLI output"*.
11//!
12//! # Allowlist, not denylist — and why that is the whole design
13//!
14//! A denylist redacts the fields somebody remembered to name. It is correct on
15//! the day it is written and wrong on the day a later task adds a field, which
16//! is the day it matters. So this sink inverts the default: **a field whose
17//! name is not in [`ALLOWED_FIELDS`] has its value replaced outright.** A task
18//! that adds `runner_token` to a log call gets `[redacted]` with no review, no
19//! ceremony, and no leak. Adding a field to the allowlist is a deliberate edit
20//! to this file that shows up in a diff.
21//!
22//! The field name itself is kept. Knowing that an event carried a
23//! `runner_token` field is useful, and the name is not the secret.
24//!
25//! # Two layers, because one is not enough
26//!
27//! The allowlist protects *fields*. It cannot protect the message body, which
28//! has to be allowed or the logs say nothing — and a message body is exactly
29//! where a secret ends up when somebody writes
30//! `info!("failed with {authorization}")`. So every string that survives the
31//! allowlist is then scrubbed by value shape ([`redact`]): GitHub token
32//! prefixes, credential header names, long opaque runs such as an encoded JIT
33//! configuration, and filesystem paths.
34//!
35//! Scrubbing by shape over-redacts, deliberately. Some of that is worth knowing
36//! about before it surprises somebody:
37//!
38//! - A slash-rooted word is treated as a filesystem path, and a URL *path* on
39//! its own looks exactly like one. Log a full URL — `https://api.github.com/…`
40//! — and it survives intact; log a bare `/repos/owner/repo` and it becomes
41//! `[path]`.
42//! - Any unbroken run of 40 or more base64, base64url, or hex characters is
43//! treated as an opaque secret. There is exactly one carve-out: a value that
44//! is precisely 64 lowercase hex characters is a SHA-256 digest, and renders
45//! as a labelled 12-character prefix rather than disappearing. A digest is
46//! not a secret, and `07-security.md` makes checksum verification a security
47//! gate whose most useful diagnostic is expected-versus-actual.
48//! - A JSON Web Token is redacted whole. Its `.` separators split it into runs
49//! the opaque-run rule is too short-sighted to catch, so it is recognised by
50//! shape instead: two or three base64url segments whose header begins `eyJ`.
51//! - A URL keeps its scheme, host and path and loses everything that
52//! authenticates it: the `user:password@` userinfo, the query string, and the
53//! fragment. The userinfo matters more than it looks — a
54//! token-authenticated git remote is
55//! `https://x-access-token:ghu_…@github.com/owner/repo.git`, so it is the
56//! shape a clone or fetch failure arrives in. The path stays diagnosable but
57//! is not exempt: each segment goes through the same shape rules on its own,
58//! because a token in `…/raw/ghu_…/f` is a token, and the alternative was the
59//! one place the belt never ran. A 40-character git object name is opaque
60//! enough to go with it.
61//! - A word ending in `:` or `=` whose stem is a credential header name causes
62//! the next two words to be redacted, so `Authorization: Bearer ghu_…` loses
63//! both the scheme and the token.
64//!
65//! A word is cut on structural punctuation — `,`, `;`, `{`, `}`, `[`, `]`,
66//! `<`, `>` and `&` — before any of that runs, and each fragment is then judged
67//! the way a whole word is: unwrapped, judged on its core, and re-emitted with
68//! its punctuation put back. Without that cut only the *first* key/value pair
69//! in a compact structure is ever examined, and redaction becomes a function of
70//! field order: `{"encoded_jit_config":"…"}` was caught and
71//! `{"runner_id":42,"encoded_jit_config":"…"}` was not, while
72//! `serde_json::to_string` is what decides which of the two an error body is.
73//! Nesting, a form-encoded body, a `;`-separated connection string and a plist
74//! element are all that same defect in different punctuation. So is an array
75//! element, one step further down — a fragment judged *with* its quote still
76//! attached matches no shape rule at all, and an array element is the one
77//! fragment that has no key of its own to give it away.
78//!
79//! Because the cut is flat, a credential's value does not have to be in the
80//! same fragment as the key that names it — `{"password":["hunter2"]}`,
81//! `{"password":{"v":"hunter2"}}` and a plist's
82//! `<key>password</key><string>hunter2</string>` all put it one or more
83//! fragments away — so a *carry* is threaded along the fragments to say that a
84//! key is still waiting for its value, or that a quoted value was cut before
85//! its closing quote. It steps over element names, because markup is not the
86//! value a key named, and it stops at the punctuation that visibly closes the
87//! value, because a redaction reported where no secret was is a false signal in
88//! the one log a reader consults to find out whether anything leaked.
89//!
90//! A URL is cut out of the text around it rather than being allowed to own the
91//! rest of the word. Its scheme is the run of scheme characters immediately
92//! before the `://`, and it ends at the first character that cannot appear in a
93//! URL — plus, *ahead of its query string only*, at a `;` or an `&`, which are
94//! structural characters everywhere else and are query syntax after the `?`.
95//! Everything on either side goes back through the rules. So
96//! `{"documentation_url":"https://…","token":"ghu_…"}` — which is what a GitHub
97//! REST error body looks like — keeps the URL and redacts the token, rather
98//! than the URL swallowing the token, and
99//! `Server=https://vault.local/api;Password=…` keeps the URL and redacts the
100//! password rather than the URL swallowing the `;` that separates them.
101//!
102//! **The text after a URL is iterated over, not recursed into.** That is a
103//! memory-safety property, not a style: recursing there made stack depth linear
104//! in the length of the message, and ~86 KB of URL-carrying JSON exited
105//! `STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW`. A stack overflow is not catchable and takes the
106//! process with it, so an attacker-influenceable error body could kill the
107//! agent from inside its own log sink — and a sink that is not running redacts
108//! nothing at all. For the same reason every search in `split_url` is bounded
109//! by the URL's own end: a pass that never returns is as effective a denial as
110//! one that overflows.
111//!
112//! A key is also trimmed of backslashes, which a value never is: `Debug` on a
113//! `String` escapes the quotes inside it, so a body reached through
114//! `error!(reason = ?err)` spells its keys `\"password\"`. The `trim_key`
115//! function documents why the same trim must not be applied to a value; it is
116//! named rather than linked because it is private and this module's
117//! documentation is not.
118//!
119//! Every one of those is a case where being wrong costs a slightly less
120//! readable log line, against a case where being wrong the other way costs a
121//! disclosed credential.
122//!
123//! # What this does not do
124//!
125//! It does not stop a caller printing to standard output, and it does not
126//! redact a `Debug` derive somewhere else in the program. Those are held by
127//! different controls: `secrecy::SecretString` for the two values that matter
128//! (`07-security.md`'s credential inventory), and
129//! [`crate::process::SpawnSpec::spawn_with_handoff`] for the command line.
130
131use std::fmt;
132use std::io::Write;
133use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
134
135use serde_json::{Map, Value};
136use tracing::field::{Field, Visit};
137use tracing::{Event, Subscriber};
138use tracing_subscriber::layer::{Context, Layer};
139use tracing_subscriber::registry::LookupSpan;
140
141/// What replaces a value this sink will not emit.
142pub const REDACTION: &str = "[redacted]";
143
144/// What replaces something that was recognisably a filesystem path. Distinct
145/// from [`REDACTION`] so a reader can tell "a path was here" from "a secret was
146/// here" without either being disclosed.
147pub const PATH_REDACTION: &str = "[path]";
148
149/// The field names this sink emits verbatim. Everything else is replaced with
150/// [`REDACTION`].
151///
152/// ---
153///
154/// **Read this before adding a name.** A field on this list still passes
155/// through [`redact`], so adding one does not switch redaction off — but it
156/// does mean the field's value reaches the scrubber instead of being discarded,
157/// and the scrubber only recognises shapes it was taught. Add a name only when
158/// the value is structurally incapable of carrying a credential: an
159/// identifier, an enumerated state, a count, a duration. Never add a name whose
160/// value is free text supplied by GitHub or by a workflow.
161///
162/// Kept sorted, and a test enforces that, so an addition is one line in a diff
163/// rather than a name buried in the middle of a list.
164pub const ALLOWED_FIELDS: &[&str] = &[
165 "arch",
166 "attempt",
167 "attempt_id",
168 "attempt_state",
169 "capacity",
170 "count",
171 // Seconds a rate-limited client waits before its next request.
172 "delay_secs",
173 "demand",
174 "desired",
175 "duration_ms",
176 "elapsed_ms",
177 "error_kind",
178 "event",
179 "exit_code",
180 "headroom",
181 "host_id",
182 "http_status",
183 "installation_id",
184 "job_id",
185 // A closed enum's `Display`, such as a rate limit's primary/secondary kind.
186 "kind",
187 "label",
188 "lock",
189 "lock_wait_ms",
190 "materialize_ms",
191 "message",
192 "mode",
193 "os",
194 "outcome",
195 "pid",
196 "policy_id",
197 "policy_state",
198 "reason",
199 "register_ms",
200 // GitHub's `x-ratelimit-remaining`: a request count.
201 "remaining",
202 "retry_in_ms",
203 "runner_id",
204 "scope",
205 "spawn_ms",
206 "start_mode",
207 "state",
208 "target",
209 "version",
210];
211
212/// Header and parameter names whose value is a credential.
213///
214/// Compared case-insensitively with `-` and `_` treated as the same character,
215/// because the same header arrives as `Authorization`, `authorization`, and
216/// `x_api_key` depending on who wrote the line.
217const CREDENTIAL_KEYS: &[&str] = &[
218 "access.token",
219 "api.key",
220 "apikey",
221 "auth",
222 "authorization",
223 "client.secret",
224 "cookie",
225 "credential",
226 "encoded.jit.config",
227 "jit",
228 "jit.config",
229 "jitconfig",
230 "password",
231 "private.token",
232 "proxy.authorization",
233 "refresh.token",
234 "secret",
235 "set.cookie",
236 "token",
237 "www.authenticate",
238 "x.api.key",
239 "x.auth.token",
240 "x.github.token",
241 "x.hub.signature",
242 "x.hub.signature.256",
243];
244
245/// Authentication scheme words. Whatever follows one of these is the
246/// credential.
247const SCHEME_WORDS: &[&str] = &["basic", "bearer", "digest", "negotiate", "token"];
248
249/// Prefixes GitHub gives its credentials. Present as a belt on top of the
250/// opaque-run rule below, because a short-lived or truncated token can be under
251/// the length threshold while still being a live credential.
252const TOKEN_PREFIXES: &[&str] = &["ghp_", "gho_", "ghu_", "ghs_", "ghr_", "github_pat_", "gh_"];
253
254/// How long an unbroken run of opaque characters has to be before it is assumed
255/// to be a secret.
256///
257/// 40 rather than something shorter so that ordinary identifiers, hyphenated
258/// words, and UUIDs (36 characters, and not secret) survive; short enough that
259/// every GitHub credential format and every encoded JIT configuration is well
260/// past it.
261const OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD: usize = 40;
262
263/// Characters that make up base64, base64url, and hex.
264fn is_opaque_char(c: char) -> bool {
265 c.is_ascii_alphanumeric() || matches!(c, '+' | '/' | '=' | '_' | '-')
266}
267
268/// Punctuation that may wrap a value without being part of it.
269const WRAPPERS: &[char] = &[
270 '"', '\'', '`', '(', ')', '[', ']', '{', '}', '<', '>', ',', ';', '.', '!', '?',
271];
272
273/// Punctuation that separates one key/value pair from the next *inside* a
274/// single whitespace-delimited word.
275///
276/// [`redact_core`] judges a fragment by splitting it once, on the first `=` or
277/// `:` it finds. That is enough for `key=value` and for a one-field object,
278/// and it is why every shape this module was tested against put the credential
279/// in the first pair. It is not enough for anything `serde_json::to_string`
280/// actually emits: a struct with two fields becomes
281/// `{"runner_id":42,"encoded_jit_config":"…"}`, where the only pair ever
282/// examined is `runner_id`. Nesting is the same defect one level down, and a
283/// form-encoded body is the same defect spelled with `&`.
284///
285/// So a word is cut on these before any of that runs, and each fragment is
286/// judged on its own, by [`redact_fragment`]. The separators go back verbatim,
287/// because the structure around a redaction is what keeps the line diagnosable.
288///
289/// `;` is here for the reason `&` is: it separates the pairs of a Windows
290/// connection string (`Server=host;Database=x;Password=…`), of a credential
291/// string, and of a cookie header written without a space after the separator.
292/// It was already in [`WRAPPERS`] — recognised as punctuation, and so never
293/// used to cut — which left `Set-Cookie: theme=dark; session=…` safe only
294/// because of the space. `d2` logs keychain, DPAPI and libsecret failures, and
295/// that is the shape they arrive in.
296///
297/// `<` and `>` are here because [`split_wrappers`] strips only the *outermost*
298/// pair, so `<string>ghu_…</string>` reached the rules as
299/// `string>ghu_…</string`, which is on no list and matches no shape. `d3`'s
300/// installers handle launchd plists, which is where that shape comes from.
301const STRUCTURAL: &[char] = &[',', ';', '{', '}', '[', ']', '<', '>', '&'];
302
303/// Whether this sink will emit a field's value rather than replacing it.
304#[must_use]
305pub fn is_field_allowed(name: &str) -> bool {
306 ALLOWED_FIELDS.binary_search(&name).is_ok()
307}
308
309/// Trims the punctuation a *key* can arrive wrapped in: [`WRAPPERS`], plus the
310/// backslash.
311///
312/// The backslash is here rather than in [`WRAPPERS`] on purpose, and the
313/// distinction is load-bearing in both directions.
314///
315/// It has to be trimmed somewhere. `tracing::error!(reason = ?err)` reaches
316/// this module through `record_debug` and `format!("{:?}")`, and `Debug` on a
317/// `String` escapes the quotes inside it — so an error whose `Debug` embeds an
318/// HTTP body arrives with its keys spelled `\"password\"`. Trimming only
319/// [`WRAPPERS`] leaves the backslash welded on, and `\"password\` is on no
320/// list. That is `d2`'s shape: a secret-store failure carrying the body it was
321/// handed.
322///
323/// It must not be trimmed unconditionally. [`split_wrappers`] runs before
324/// [`looks_like_path`], so a `\` in [`WRAPPERS`] would strip the leading
325/// `\\` that UNC detection keys on, and `\\server\share` would stop being
326/// recognised as a path. A key is the one place a backslash can never be part
327/// of the value, so it is the one place the trim is unconditional;
328/// [`trim_start_wrappers`] takes the same backslash off a *value* only when it
329/// is escaping punctuation.
330fn trim_key(key: &str) -> &str {
331 key.trim()
332 .trim_matches(|c: char| c == '\\' || WRAPPERS.contains(&c))
333}
334
335fn normalise_key(key: &str) -> String {
336 trim_key(key).to_ascii_lowercase().replace(['-', '_'], ".")
337}
338
339fn is_credential_key(key: &str) -> bool {
340 let key = normalise_key(key);
341 CREDENTIAL_KEYS.contains(&key.as_str())
342}
343
344fn is_scheme_word(word: &str) -> bool {
345 SCHEME_WORDS.contains(&word.to_ascii_lowercase().as_str())
346}
347
348/// Scrubs a string of anything that looks like a credential, an encoded JIT
349/// configuration, or a filesystem path.
350///
351/// Applied to every string this sink emits, including the ones whose field name
352/// is on [`ALLOWED_FIELDS`]. Also public so that the TUI and the CLI can put a
353/// value through the same rules before showing it, rather than inventing a
354/// second, differently wrong set.
355#[must_use]
356pub fn redact(text: &str) -> String {
357 let mut out = String::with_capacity(text.len());
358 // How many upcoming words to replace outright, because a credential key or
359 // an authentication scheme word said the value comes next.
360 let mut pending: u32 = 0;
361
362 for chunk in text.split_inclusive(char::is_whitespace) {
363 let (word, whitespace) = split_trailing_whitespace(chunk);
364
365 if word.is_empty() {
366 out.push_str(whitespace);
367 continue;
368 }
369
370 if pending > 0 {
371 pending -= 1;
372 out.push_str(REDACTION);
373 out.push_str(whitespace);
374 // A header value ends at a comma or semicolon; anything after that
375 // is the next header's name and is not a secret.
376 if word.ends_with([',', ';']) {
377 pending = 0;
378 }
379 continue;
380 }
381
382 let (rendered, follow_on) = redact_word(word);
383 out.push_str(&rendered);
384 out.push_str(whitespace);
385 pending = follow_on;
386 }
387
388 out
389}
390
391/// Splits a chunk produced by `split_inclusive` into its word and the single
392/// whitespace character that terminated it, if any.
393fn split_trailing_whitespace(chunk: &str) -> (&str, &str) {
394 match chunk.char_indices().next_back() {
395 Some((index, last)) if last.is_whitespace() => chunk.split_at(index),
396 _ => (chunk, ""),
397 }
398}
399
400/// Splits a fragment into its leading wrapping punctuation, its core, and its
401/// trailing wrapping punctuation.
402///
403/// Shared by [`redact_word`] and [`redact_core`], because both have to judge a
404/// fragment on its core while emitting it with its punctuation intact.
405///
406/// [`WRAPPERS`], and an *escaped* quote as well. Escaped text is exactly what
407/// a `Debug` rendering of a string is, and in it every quote arrives with a
408/// backslash welded on — so a value spelled `\"ghu_…\"` is wrapped in the
409/// same way `"ghu_…"` is, and none of the shape rules can see the token until
410/// the wrapper comes off. Trimming the key alone is not enough: `runner_token`
411/// is deliberately *not* on [`CREDENTIAL_KEYS`], because a name is not what
412/// makes a value a secret, so that pair is caught by the token-prefix rule
413/// reading its value or it is not caught at all.
414fn split_wrappers(fragment: &str) -> (&str, &str, &str) {
415 let leading = fragment.len() - trim_start_wrappers(fragment).len();
416 let (prefix, rest) = fragment.split_at(leading);
417 let core_len = trim_end_wrappers(rest).len();
418 let (core, suffix) = rest.split_at(core_len);
419 (prefix, core, suffix)
420}
421
422/// Trims wrapping punctuation from the front of a fragment.
423///
424/// A backslash counts as punctuation **only when it escapes punctuation**, and
425/// that restriction is the whole of what keeps this safe. `\"value` is a
426/// quoted value spelled the way an escaped rendering spells it, and the
427/// backslash is not part of the value. `\\server\share` is a UNC path whose
428/// leading backslashes escape nothing and *are* the value — trimming them is
429/// exactly what would stop [`looks_like_path`] recognising it, and this runs
430/// before [`looks_like_path`] does. `\\` is not a backslash-escaping-a-
431/// wrapper, so the two cases separate cleanly.
432fn trim_start_wrappers(fragment: &str) -> &str {
433 let mut rest = fragment;
434 loop {
435 let trimmed = rest.trim_start_matches(WRAPPERS);
436 let trimmed = match trimmed.strip_prefix('\\') {
437 Some(after) if after.starts_with(WRAPPERS) => after,
438 _ => trimmed,
439 };
440 if trimmed.len() == rest.len() {
441 return rest;
442 }
443 rest = trimmed;
444 }
445}
446
447/// Trims wrapping punctuation from the end of a fragment.
448///
449/// A trailing backslash goes with it, and needs no adjacency test: trimming
450/// runs right to left, so a backslash that has reached the end is one whose
451/// quote has already been taken off. A path that ends in a separator is still
452/// a path without it.
453fn trim_end_wrappers(fragment: &str) -> &str {
454 let mut rest = fragment;
455 loop {
456 let trimmed = rest.trim_end_matches(WRAPPERS).trim_end_matches('\\');
457 if trimmed.len() == rest.len() {
458 return rest;
459 }
460 rest = trimmed;
461 }
462}
463
464/// What a credential key left outstanding at the end of the text that named it.
465///
466/// The structural cut is flat and a credential's value does not have to be in
467/// the same fragment as the key that names it, so something has to carry the
468/// key across the cut. Nothing did, which is [`redact_core`]'s empty-value
469/// case: the comment there claimed the value would be reached "in the next
470/// fragment, where the structural cut reaches it", and no such thing happened.
471///
472/// The two variants are not the same claim, and collapsing them over-redacts:
473///
474/// - [`Carry::Expecting`] is *"a key named a value that has not appeared yet"*.
475/// It has to step over markup, because `<key>password</key><string>…</string>`
476/// puts `/key` and `string` between the key and its value.
477/// - [`Carry::Unclosed`] is *"a quoted value was redacted and its closing quote
478/// is not in this fragment"*, so the value continues past the cut. Inside an
479/// open quote `<` and `>` are literal text rather than markup, so this one
480/// must *not* step over anything.
481#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
482enum Carry {
483 /// Nothing outstanding.
484 None,
485 /// A credential key supplied no value of its own.
486 Expecting,
487 /// A redacted credential value was cut before its closing quote.
488 Unclosed,
489}
490
491/// Whether wrapping punctuation closes the value it followed.
492///
493/// A quote closes a string and a bracket closes a structure, so either one
494/// means the credential value ended here and a carry must stop. `,` and `;` are
495/// on the list for the reason [`redact`] already stops its word-level follow-on
496/// at them: they end a header value, and what comes after is the next header's
497/// name.
498///
499/// `>` is deliberately absent. It closes a *tag*, not a value —
500/// `<key>password</key>` ends in one with the credential's value still to come
501/// — and treating it as a terminator is what would leave the multi-word plist
502/// spelling leaking.
503fn closes_a_value(wrappers: &str) -> bool {
504 wrappers.contains(['"', '\'', '`', ',', ';', ']', '}', ')'])
505}
506
507/// Whether a value opened a quote that its own fragment did not close.
508fn opens_an_unclosed_quote(lead: &str, trail: &str) -> bool {
509 const QUOTES: [char; 3] = ['"', '\'', '`'];
510 lead.contains(QUOTES) && !trail.contains(QUOTES)
511}
512
513/// Whether a fragment sits where an element *name* goes rather than where its
514/// content does.
515///
516/// `<` and `>` are in [`STRUCTURAL`] because `<string>ghu_…</string>` reached
517/// the rules as `string>ghu_…</string` and matched nothing. Having cut on them,
518/// the loop knows which side of a tag it is on, and a [`Carry::Expecting`] must
519/// not be spent on `/key` or `string` when the value it is waiting for is the
520/// element's content. A tag name is still judged by every other rule — this
521/// says only that it is not the value a credential key named.
522fn is_tag_name(preceding: Option<char>, following: Option<char>) -> bool {
523 preceding == Some('<') && following == Some('>')
524}
525
526/// Redacts one whitespace-delimited word, and says how many following words the
527/// word implicates.
528fn redact_word(word: &str) -> (String, u32) {
529 // Wrapping punctuation is kept so that JSON-ish and prose context survives
530 // — `("ghu_…")` should become `("[redacted]")`, not `[redacted]`.
531 let (prefix, core, suffix) = split_wrappers(word);
532
533 if core.is_empty() {
534 return (word.to_string(), 0);
535 }
536
537 // A bare credential key or scheme word: the value is the next word.
538 //
539 // The stem is unwrapped before it is judged: spaced JSON writes the key as
540 // `"password":`, which leaves `password"` welded to a quote, and that is on
541 // no list. A long value survived this anyway by way of the opaque-run rule,
542 // so the gap only ever showed on a short one.
543 let stem = core.trim_end_matches([':', '=']);
544 if stem.len() < core.len() && is_credential_key(stem) {
545 // Two, so that `Authorization: Bearer <token>` loses the scheme and the
546 // token rather than only the scheme.
547 return (word.to_string(), 2);
548 }
549 if is_scheme_word(core) {
550 return (word.to_string(), 1);
551 }
552
553 let (rendered, carry) = redact_core(core, suffix);
554
555 // A value the word did not finish is the *next* word's problem, which is
556 // the follow-on rule the word level already has, reached from one level
557 // down. A pretty-printed plist is why it is needed: `<key>password</key>`
558 // and `<string>hunter2</string>` are on separate lines, so the key and its
559 // value are not even in the same word.
560 //
561 // The two carries ask for different amounts, for the same reason the stem
562 // rule above asks for two words and not one:
563 //
564 // - [`Carry::Expecting`] means the value has not been seen *at all*, so it
565 // may be introduced by a word of its own — `<string>correct` and then
566 // `horse</string>`. Two, exactly as `Authorization: Bearer <token>` needs
567 // two.
568 // - [`Carry::Unclosed`] means the value has already started and was cut, so
569 // only its remainder is outstanding. One.
570 //
571 // Trailing punctuation that closes the value withdraws the claim, for the
572 // same reason pass one declines an empty value: `{"password":""}` names a
573 // credential and supplies nothing, and redacting the next word there would
574 // report a secret where none was.
575 let follow_on = if closes_a_value(suffix) {
576 0
577 } else {
578 match carry {
579 Carry::None => 0,
580 Carry::Unclosed => 1,
581 Carry::Expecting => 2,
582 }
583 };
584 (format!("{prefix}{rendered}{suffix}"), follow_on)
585}
586
587/// Redacts one fragment of a cut-up word, judging it on its core.
588///
589/// [`redact_core`] used to recurse on the *raw* fragment, and its terminal
590/// fallback then handed that fragment to [`redact_value`] with its wrapping
591/// punctuation still attached. A fragment carrying no `:` or `=` of its own —
592/// which is exactly what an array element is — therefore reached the shape
593/// rules as `"ghu_…`, where `starts_with("ghu_")` fails, [`is_opaque_char`]
594/// fails on the quote, the `eyJ` test fails, and [`looks_like_path`] never gets
595/// a clean look at `"C:\Users\…`.
596///
597/// That is the defect the structural cut was written to close, one step further
598/// down: *"only the first key/value pair is ever examined"* became *"a value
599/// with no key of its own is never examined"*. It survived a round because the
600/// secret-injection scan had no array among its shapes, which is the same
601/// lesson in a different place — a check that cannot fail proves nothing.
602///
603/// So a fragment is treated the way [`redact_word`] treats a word: split,
604/// judge the core, put the punctuation back.
605///
606/// The *word-level* follow-on rule is still not repeated here, and the reason
607/// stands: *"the value is the next word"* is a statement about whitespace, and
608/// there is no next word inside a fragment. What that argument does not cover —
609/// and what an earlier spelling of it wrongly took itself to have settled — is
610/// the *fragment-level* claim: **the value is the next fragment**. That one is
611/// a statement about the structural cut, it is true, and nothing implemented
612/// it, which is why `{"password":["hunter2"]}` and
613/// `<key>password</key><string>hunter2</string>` went out whole. [`Carry`] is
614/// that claim, threaded through the loop in [`redact_core`].
615///
616/// `trailing` says this is the last fragment of its core, and it is what keeps
617/// the carry from escaping a word it has already been spent inside: consuming
618/// a claim in the middle of a core settles it, while consuming it at the end
619/// leaves open the possibility that the value runs on into the next word.
620fn redact_fragment(
621 fragment: &str,
622 carry: Carry,
623 tag_name: bool,
624 trailing: bool,
625) -> (String, Carry) {
626 let (prefix, core, suffix) = split_wrappers(fragment);
627 if core.is_empty() {
628 return (fragment.to_string(), carry);
629 }
630
631 let claimed = match carry {
632 Carry::None => false,
633 // Markup is not the value a credential key named.
634 Carry::Expecting => !tag_name,
635 // Inside an open quote there is no markup, only text.
636 Carry::Unclosed => true,
637 };
638
639 if claimed {
640 // Two different reasons to think the value has more to come, and one
641 // answer: it is `Unclosed` from here, never the `Expecting` it may have
642 // arrived as, because the value has now started.
643 //
644 // - `carry == Unclosed` — still inside an open quote, so the value runs
645 // into the next fragment as well.
646 // - `trailing` — a claim spent on the *last* fragment of a core is one
647 // whose value reached the end of the word with nothing closing it, so
648 // it may continue into the next word.
649 // `<key>password</key><string>` + `correct horse</string>` is that
650 // shape.
651 //
652 // Anything else was spent in the middle of a core, where the value was
653 // and is done — and punctuation that closes a string or a structure
654 // settles it either way.
655 let next = if !closes_a_value(suffix) && (carry == Carry::Unclosed || trailing) {
656 Carry::Unclosed
657 } else {
658 Carry::None
659 };
660 return (format!("{prefix}{REDACTION}{suffix}"), next);
661 }
662
663 let (rendered, next) = redact_core(core, suffix);
664 let next = if closes_a_value(suffix) {
665 Carry::None
666 } else if next == Carry::None {
667 // **An unclaimed fragment preserves the claim rather than clearing
668 // it.** This is the whole of what lets a plist work: `/key` and
669 // `string` sit between `<key>password</key>` and the `<string>` content
670 // that is the value, they are tag names so they do not spend the claim,
671 // and a fragment that neither spends nor arms one must leave it exactly
672 // as it found it. Overwriting with this fragment's own (empty) result
673 // is how `<key>password</key><string>hunter2</string>` kept leaking
674 // after the carry existed.
675 carry
676 } else {
677 next
678 };
679 (format!("{prefix}{rendered}{suffix}"), next)
680}
681
682/// Redacts one word with its wrapping punctuation already removed, and reports
683/// what it left outstanding for whatever follows it.
684///
685/// `closing` is the wrapping punctuation the caller stripped off the end of
686/// this core. It is not emitted here — the caller puts it back — but the loop
687/// below has to see it, because the character that follows the *last* fragment
688/// is what says whether that fragment is an element name or an element's
689/// content.
690fn redact_core(core: &str, closing: &str) -> (String, Carry) {
691 // A URL survives, minus everything on it that carries a credential. The
692 // scheme, host and path are what makes a log line diagnosable.
693 //
694 // The URL is *cut out* of the text around it rather than being allowed to
695 // own the rest of the fragment, and both sides of the cut come back through
696 // here. [`split_url`] documents what the old unbounded `split_once("://")`
697 // cost. This still runs ahead of the structural cut, because a query string
698 // is `redact_url`'s to own: `?` and `#` are not structural characters, and
699 // an OAuth implicit-flow response puts the token after one of them.
700 //
701 // **The tail is iterated, not recursed into, and that is a memory-safety
702 // property rather than a matter of taste.** An earlier spelling called
703 // `redact_core` on the remainder, and argued only that the recursion
704 // *terminates*: every call is on a strictly shorter slice, which is true
705 // and is not enough. Termination says nothing about **depth**, and depth
706 // was linear in the length of the input — one frame per URL. A message of
707 // ~2000 `{"url":"https://…"},` items, about 86 KB, exited
708 // `0xc00000fd STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW`.
709 //
710 // A stack overflow is not a `panic`: it is not catchable, it does not
711 // unwind, and it takes the process with it. A large HTTP error body is
712 // content an attacker can influence, so that was a way to kill the agent
713 // from inside its own log sink — and a sink that is not running redacts
714 // nothing at all, which is worse than any single leak.
715 //
716 // With the loop, every remaining re-entry is depth-bounded by construction
717 // rather than by argument:
718 //
719 // - `prefix` holds everything before the *first* `://`, so it contains no
720 // `://` and cannot reach this branch again.
721 // - `rest` is what is left when the loop finds no further `://`, for the
722 // same reason.
723 // - the structural branch below calls [`redact_fragment`], whose fragments
724 // contain no structural character by construction and so cannot reach it
725 // again either.
726 //
727 // Three levels, whatever the input is. Anything added here that recurses on
728 // a slice whose length is not bounded by a constant re-opens this.
729 if let Some((prefix, scheme, url, remainder)) = split_url(core) {
730 let mut out = String::with_capacity(core.len());
731 if !prefix.is_empty() {
732 out.push_str(&redact_core(prefix, "").0);
733 }
734 out.push_str(&redact_url(scheme, url));
735
736 let mut rest = remainder;
737 while let Some((prefix, scheme, url, remainder)) = split_url(rest) {
738 if !prefix.is_empty() {
739 out.push_str(&redact_core(prefix, "").0);
740 }
741 out.push_str(&redact_url(scheme, url));
742 rest = remainder;
743 }
744 if !rest.is_empty() {
745 out.push_str(&redact_core(rest, "").0);
746 }
747
748 // A URL is a complete value: it carries its own credentials in its own
749 // places, and `redact_url` has already dealt with them. Nothing is
750 // outstanding, which is also what keeps `{"token":"https://…"}` from
751 // arming a claim against whatever follows the URL.
752 return (out, Carry::None);
753 }
754
755 // A Windows drive path is `key:value`-shaped by accident, and
756 // `looks_like_path` only recognises the drive letter at position zero.
757 // Splitting such a path on its colon would hand the tail to a rule that
758 // matches nothing, so it has to be judged whole, before the separators
759 // get at it.
760 if looks_like_path(core) {
761 return (PATH_REDACTION.to_string(), Carry::None);
762 }
763
764 // A compact structure holds more than one key/value pair, and the rules
765 // below examine exactly one of them: `split_once` stops at the first
766 // separator it finds. So `{"encoded_jit_config":"…"}` was caught and
767 // `{"runner_id":42,"encoded_jit_config":"…"}` was not — the two differ by
768 // field order and by nothing else, and `serde_json::to_string` is what
769 // chooses the order. Nesting was the same defect: the value recursion
770 // below ends at `redact_value`, which is a leaf and never comes back
771 // here, so an object inside an object went out whole. A form-encoded body
772 // was the same defect again, with `&` as a separator nothing knew.
773 //
774 // Cutting on [`STRUCTURAL`] first turns all three into the shape the rules
775 // already handle, and does it at any depth: the cut is flat, so
776 // `{"a":{"b":{"token":"…"}}}` yields the same fragments a one-level object
777 // would.
778 //
779 // Each fragment goes through [`redact_fragment`] rather than straight back
780 // in here, because a fragment carries its own wrapping punctuation and a
781 // value judged with its quote attached matches nothing at all.
782 //
783 // The recursion terminates *and is depth-bounded*: a fragment contains no
784 // structural character by construction, so `redact_fragment` cannot reach
785 // this branch again, and the URL branch above iterates over its tail rather
786 // than recursing into it. The loop here is a loop for the same reason — a
787 // fragment per separator, at whatever length the input has.
788 //
789 // A [`Carry`] is threaded along it because the cut is flat and a
790 // credential's value need not be in the same fragment as its key. Without
791 // it the empty-value skip in pass one was a promise nothing kept: the value
792 // was said to be reachable "in the next fragment", and no next fragment
793 // ever heard about the key.
794 if core.contains(STRUCTURAL) {
795 let mut out = String::with_capacity(core.len());
796 let mut carry = Carry::None;
797 let mut rest = core;
798 // The separator on each side of a fragment is what says whether it is
799 // an element name or an element's content.
800 let mut preceding: Option<char> = None;
801 while let Some(index) = rest.find(STRUCTURAL) {
802 let (fragment, tail) = rest.split_at(index);
803 // Every character in `STRUCTURAL` is ASCII, so the separator is
804 // one byte, this cannot split a code point, and the byte is the
805 // whole character.
806 let separator = char::from(tail.as_bytes()[0]);
807 if !fragment.is_empty() {
808 let (rendered, next) = redact_fragment(
809 fragment,
810 carry,
811 is_tag_name(preceding, Some(separator)),
812 false,
813 );
814 out.push_str(&rendered);
815 carry = next;
816 }
817 out.push_str(&tail[..1]);
818 preceding = Some(separator);
819 rest = &tail[1..];
820 }
821 if !rest.is_empty() {
822 // The last fragment's *following* character is the caller's closing
823 // punctuation: in `<key>password</key>` the final `/key` is a tag
824 // name only because the `>` that ends it was stripped as a wrapper
825 // before this ran.
826 let following = closing.chars().next();
827 let (rendered, next) =
828 redact_fragment(rest, carry, is_tag_name(preceding, following), true);
829 out.push_str(&rendered);
830 carry = next;
831 }
832 return (out, carry);
833 }
834
835 // `key=value` and `key:value` in a single fragment.
836 //
837 // Pass one asks only whether either separator names a credential, and it
838 // runs to completion before any value is inspected, because the *first*
839 // separator in a fragment is not necessarily the one that names the key.
840 //
841 // The witness is a webhook signature header in its compact-JSON spelling,
842 // `{"x-hub-signature-256":"sha256=<hmac>"}`, and
843 // `a_credential_header_loses_its_scheme_and_its_value` holds it. The `=`
844 // comes first and names nothing, but what follows it is a whole HMAC —
845 // *non-empty*, so a merged pass inspects that value, renders it as a
846 // digest prefix, and returns without ever reaching the `:` that names
847 // `x-hub-signature-256`. `{"password":"a=b"}` is the same witness with
848 // nothing else going on: merged, it comes out whole.
849 //
850 // Two earlier spellings of this comment named
851 // `{"encoded_jit_config":"eyJ…In0="}` and then
852 // `{"encoded_jit_config":"eyJ…In0=","runner_id":42}`, and neither
853 // demonstrates the invariant: base64 padding is trailing-only, so the `=`
854 // split yields a value that `split_wrappers` trims to empty, and the
855 // `value.is_empty()` guard in pass two falls through to the `:` anyway. A
856 // comment naming a case that does not demonstrate its own invariant is how
857 // the invariant gets deleted by the next person, so the witness above is
858 // one that reds a named test when the two passes are merged.
859 //
860 // Both halves are judged through `trim_key`: compact JSON welds a quote to
861 // each, so the key arrives as `encoded_jit_config"`, and a `Debug`
862 // rendering welds a backslash as well.
863 // Whether pass one saw a credential key and was given nothing to redact.
864 let mut names_a_credential = false;
865
866 for separator in ['=', ':'] {
867 if let Some((key, raw_value)) = core.split_once(separator)
868 && is_credential_key(key)
869 {
870 // The value's own wrapping punctuation goes back, exactly as pass
871 // two puts it back. Dropping it emitted `{"password":[redacted]"}`
872 // — an unbalanced quote in a line this module argues, correctly,
873 // has to stay diagnosable, and a reader who cannot parse the line
874 // cannot tell a redaction from a truncation.
875 let (lead, value, trail) = split_wrappers(raw_value);
876
877 // An empty value is nothing to redact, and pass two declines one
878 // for the same reason. Claiming `[redacted]` here says a secret was
879 // somewhere none was, which is a false signal in the one log a
880 // reader consults to find out whether anything leaked.
881 //
882 // It is also load-bearing for the URL branch above, which sends
883 // the text before a URL back through here: `{"token":"https://…"}`
884 // leaves this pass a key of `token` and a value of nothing, and
885 // redacting that emitted `token":"[redacted]https://…` — the URL
886 // still standing behind the redaction meant to have replaced it.
887 //
888 // **What it is not is a reason to forget the key.** An earlier
889 // spelling of this comment said the value would be found "in the
890 // next fragment or the next word, where the structural cut and the
891 // follow-on rule reach it", and half of that was false: the
892 // follow-on rule does reach the next *word*, and nothing whatever
893 // reached the next *fragment*, because `redact_fragment`
894 // deliberately carries no follow-on. So `{"password":["hunter2"]}`,
895 // `{"password":{"v":"hunter2"}}` and `Password=;hunter2` — a
896 // credential key with its value one fragment away, which is what an
897 // array, a nested object and an empty pair all are — went out
898 // whole, with the key sitting in plain sight next to them.
899 //
900 // That is the failure this module warns about two comments down: a
901 // comment naming a case that does not demonstrate its own
902 // invariant. The claim is now true because [`Carry::Expecting`]
903 // implements it, and `the_fragment_carry_stops_where_the_value_does`
904 // holds both halves — that the claim is made, and that it is
905 // withdrawn where the value visibly ended.
906 if value.is_empty() {
907 names_a_credential = true;
908 continue;
909 }
910
911 // A quoted value whose closing quote is not in this fragment is a
912 // value the cut ran through the middle of: `{"password":"p&ss"}`
913 // reaches here as `password":"p`, and `ss` is the rest of the
914 // secret. Adding `;`, `<` and `>` to `STRUCTURAL` this round made
915 // three more characters able to do that, and punctuated passwords
916 // are ordinary.
917 let carry = if opens_an_unclosed_quote(lead, trail) {
918 Carry::Unclosed
919 } else {
920 Carry::None
921 };
922 return (format!("{key}{separator}{lead}{REDACTION}{trail}"), carry);
923 }
924 }
925
926 // Pass two: not a credential key, but the value may still be a path or a
927 // token: `runtime=/var/lib/runner-manager/…`. Applied to `:` as well as
928 // to `=`, because `:` is what compact JSON and a bare `key:value` use,
929 // and recursing for `=` alone is what let an encoded JIT configuration
930 // and a `runner_token:ghu_…` pair through verbatim.
931 for separator in ['=', ':'] {
932 if let Some((key, raw_value)) = core.split_once(separator) {
933 let (lead, value, trail) = split_wrappers(raw_value);
934 if value.is_empty() {
935 continue;
936 }
937 let redacted = redact_value(value);
938 // `as_sha256_digest` re-attaches its own `sha256:` label, so an
939 // already-labelled digest would come back doubled as
940 // `sha256:sha256:9f86d081884c…`. Dropping the redundant label
941 // keeps the caller's own key and separator, and leaves the digest
942 // truncated -- which the unrecursed `:` path never did, and which
943 // is worth having, because an HMAC-SHA256 signature has exactly a
944 // digest's shape and was previously printed in full.
945 if trim_key(key).eq_ignore_ascii_case("sha256")
946 && let Some(bare) = redacted.strip_prefix("sha256:")
947 {
948 return (format!("{key}{separator}{lead}{bare}{trail}"), Carry::None);
949 }
950 return (
951 format!("{key}{separator}{lead}{redacted}{trail}"),
952 Carry::None,
953 );
954 }
955 }
956
957 // A credential key with no value at all — either `password:` with nothing
958 // after it, or a bare `password` between a plist's tags. Both name a value
959 // that is somewhere else, and the caller is the only one who can see where.
960 let carry = if names_a_credential || is_credential_key(core) {
961 Carry::Expecting
962 } else {
963 Carry::None
964 };
965 (redact_value(core), carry)
966}
967
968/// Characters a URL scheme is made of: RFC 3986 allows a letter followed by
969/// letters, digits, `+`, `-` and `.`.
970fn is_scheme_byte(byte: u8) -> bool {
971 byte.is_ascii_alphanumeric() || matches!(byte, b'+' | b'-' | b'.')
972}
973
974/// Characters that cannot appear inside a URL, and therefore end one.
975///
976/// `\` is deliberately absent, even though it cannot appear in a URL either.
977/// The shape it would have been there for is a `Debug`-escaped body, which
978/// spells its quotes `\"` — and the quote already ends the URL. Making the
979/// backslash a terminator as well costs a real redaction: a Windows path used
980/// as a URL password, `https://x-access-token:C:\Users\…@github.com/o/r.git`,
981/// would then end its URL at the first `\`, which puts the `@` that identifies
982/// the userinfo *outside* the span, and [`redact_url`] echoes what it is given.
983/// Measured: with `\` a terminator, that line emits the path verbatim; without
984/// it, the userinfo is replaced as it should be.
985fn is_url_terminator(c: char) -> bool {
986 c.is_whitespace() || matches!(c, '"' | ',' | '{' | '}' | '[' | ']' | '<' | '>')
987}
988
989/// The same, plus the two [`STRUCTURAL`] characters that end a URL only *ahead
990/// of its query string*.
991///
992/// [`STRUCTURAL`] has nine characters and [`is_url_terminator`] recognises seven
993/// of them; `;` and `&` were missing. Because the URL branch runs ahead of the
994/// structural cut, a URL earlier in a word made [`split_url`] swallow
995/// everything to the next terminator — including the separator that would have
996/// cut the word — and [`redact_url`]'s terminal arm echoes what it is given. So
997/// `Server=https://vault.local/api;Password=hunter2` and
998/// `cb=https://a.com/x&access_token=ghu_…` went out whole: the fix that bounds
999/// a URL and the fix that cuts on `;` and `&` each worked alone and did not
1000/// compose.
1001///
1002/// **Adding them to [`is_url_terminator`] outright is the obvious fix and the
1003/// wrong one**, which is why there are two predicates rather than one extended
1004/// list. `&` is what separates the parameters *inside* a query string, and
1005/// [`redact_url`] replaces a query wholesale precisely because a token can be
1006/// in any parameter and this module does not guess which. Measured:
1007/// `https://a.com/cb?code=1&state=hunter2` goes from `?[redacted]` to
1008/// `?[redacted]&state=hunter2`. `;` is the same story — it is a legal query
1009/// separator too.
1010///
1011/// Ahead of the `?` there is no such conflict: a `;` or an `&` in an authority
1012/// or a path is not URL syntax this module needs to keep, and something else in
1013/// the word is much the likelier reading.
1014fn is_url_head_terminator(c: char) -> bool {
1015 is_url_terminator(c) || matches!(c, ';' | '&')
1016}
1017
1018/// Finds the first URL in a fragment and cuts it out of the text around it.
1019///
1020/// Returns the text before the URL, its scheme, the URL itself with the `://`
1021/// removed, and the text after it — or `None` when the fragment holds no URL.
1022///
1023/// **Both bounds are the point.** `split_once("://")` treated *everything*
1024/// before the separator as the scheme and everything after it as the URL, and
1025/// the terminal arm of [`redact_url`] echoes both verbatim — so a single URL
1026/// anywhere in a word put the whole of the rest of that word beyond every rule
1027/// below it. `documentation_url` is in essentially every GitHub REST error
1028/// body, so that was *any* such body logged alongside a credential:
1029///
1030/// ```text
1031/// {"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest","token":"ghu_…"}
1032/// ```
1033///
1034/// came out intact. The reverse order leaked for the mirror reason —
1035/// everything before the `://` became the "scheme" — and a nested object behind
1036/// a URL was missed even when the URL's own userinfo was caught, because the
1037/// miss and the catch happened in the same call. The only thing that saved the
1038/// shape at all was a `?` or `#` *inside* the URL, which made [`redact_url`]
1039/// replace the tail.
1040///
1041/// An empty scheme run means the `://` is not introducing a URL, and the
1042/// fragment is left to the rules below rather than handed over as a URL with no
1043/// scheme.
1044fn split_url(fragment: &str) -> Option<(&str, &str, &str, &str)> {
1045 let separator = fragment.find("://")?;
1046 let before = &fragment[..separator];
1047
1048 // Scheme characters are ASCII, so a byte count is a character boundary.
1049 let scheme_len = before
1050 .bytes()
1051 .rev()
1052 .take_while(|byte| is_scheme_byte(*byte))
1053 .count();
1054 if scheme_len == 0 {
1055 return None;
1056 }
1057 let (prefix, scheme) = before.split_at(before.len() - scheme_len);
1058
1059 let after = &fragment[separator + "://".len()..];
1060
1061 // Where the URL ends no matter what, and **the bound every other search
1062 // here is taken inside**. Searching the rest of the fragment first is a
1063 // correct answer computed quadratically: a body of *n* URLs would scan the
1064 // whole remaining text once per URL looking for a `?` that is not there,
1065 // which on the 860 KB regression case in
1066 // `a_large_message_does_not_overflow_the_stack` is 17 billion character
1067 // comparisons. That test is a guard against this module taking the process
1068 // down, and a redaction pass that never returns takes it down just as
1069 // effectively as an overflow does.
1070 let end = after.find(is_url_terminator).unwrap_or(after.len());
1071 let url = &after[..end];
1072
1073 // The head is the authority and path — everything ahead of the first `?` or
1074 // `#`. Only there do `;` and `&` end the URL; inside a query string they
1075 // are query syntax, and the query is `redact_url`'s to replace wholesale.
1076 let query = url.find(['?', '#']).unwrap_or(url.len());
1077 let end = url[..query].find(is_url_head_terminator).unwrap_or(end);
1078 let (url, remainder) = after.split_at(end);
1079
1080 Some((prefix, scheme, url, remainder))
1081}
1082
1083/// Redacts the three places a URL can carry a credential, keeping the rest.
1084///
1085/// `scheme` is everything before `://` and `rest` everything after it.
1086///
1087/// The **userinfo** is the one this module used to miss, and it is not an
1088/// exotic shape: `https://x-access-token:ghu_…@github.com/owner/repo.git` is
1089/// the canonical token-authenticated git remote, so it is what `e2` and `e3`
1090/// will have in hand when a clone or a download fails and they log the error
1091/// they were given. The old `://` branch returned before the token-prefix and
1092/// opaque-run rules could run, so that URL came out intact.
1093///
1094/// A **fragment** is stripped for the same reason a query string is: an OAuth
1095/// implicit-flow response puts the token after the `#`, and the fragment is
1096/// never load-bearing for diagnosing an HTTP call.
1097fn redact_url(scheme: &str, rest: &str) -> String {
1098 // The authority runs to the first `/`, `?` or `#`.
1099 let authority_end = rest.find(['/', '?', '#']).unwrap_or(rest.len());
1100 let (authority, tail) = rest.split_at(authority_end);
1101
1102 // `rsplit_once`, not `split_once`: a password may itself contain an `@`,
1103 // and the host is what follows the *last* one.
1104 let host = match authority.rsplit_once('@') {
1105 // Replaced rather than deleted. That the request carried credentials at
1106 // all is diagnostic — it is often the answer to "why did this 401?" —
1107 // and it is the credential, not its existence, that must not be here.
1108 Some((_userinfo, host)) => format!("{REDACTION}@{host}"),
1109 None => authority.to_string(),
1110 };
1111
1112 // Whichever of `?` and `#` comes first ends the diagnosable part; anything
1113 // after it is replaced wholesale rather than parsed, because a token can be
1114 // in any parameter and this module does not guess which.
1115 match tail.find(['?', '#']) {
1116 Some(cut) => {
1117 let (path, query) = tail.split_at(cut);
1118 let separator = &query[..1];
1119 format!(
1120 "{scheme}://{host}{}{separator}{REDACTION}",
1121 redact_path(path)
1122 )
1123 }
1124 None => format!("{scheme}://{host}{}", redact_path(tail)),
1125 }
1126}
1127
1128/// Applies the shape rules to a URL path, one segment at a time.
1129///
1130/// The path is the diagnosable part of a URL and stays that way: a segment is
1131/// judged on its own, and an ordinary one — `repos`, `owner`, `actions-runner-
1132/// linux-x64-2.330.0.tar.gz` — is not a secret and is not touched. What this
1133/// closes is that [`redact_url`] previously applied *no* rule to a path at all,
1134/// so `https://github.com/o/r/raw/ghu_…/f` was echoed whole while the identical
1135/// token one character to the left of the `/` would have been replaced. The
1136/// token-prefix rule is documented as a belt that catches a credential
1137/// *anywhere*, and a path was the one place it never ran.
1138///
1139/// Segment at a time rather than whole, because [`redact_value`] would
1140/// otherwise see the `/` and hand the whole path to [`looks_like_path`], which
1141/// is exactly the over-redaction the module documentation promises a full URL
1142/// escapes.
1143///
1144/// Worth knowing: [`OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD`] is 40, and a git object name written
1145/// as hex is exactly 40 characters, so a `…/raw/<sha1>/f` URL loses its commit
1146/// to `[redacted]`. That is the module's standing trade — a less readable line
1147/// against a disclosed credential — and it is called out here because a commit
1148/// SHA is the one path segment somebody may miss.
1149fn redact_path(path: &str) -> String {
1150 let mut out = String::with_capacity(path.len());
1151 for (index, segment) in path.split('/').enumerate() {
1152 if index > 0 {
1153 out.push('/');
1154 }
1155 if !segment.is_empty() {
1156 out.push_str(&redact_value(segment));
1157 }
1158 }
1159 out
1160}
1161
1162/// The shape rules, applied to a bare value.
1163fn redact_value(value: &str) -> String {
1164 let lower = value.to_ascii_lowercase();
1165 if TOKEN_PREFIXES
1166 .iter()
1167 .any(|prefix| lower.starts_with(prefix))
1168 {
1169 return REDACTION.to_string();
1170 }
1171
1172 if looks_like_path(value) {
1173 return PATH_REDACTION.to_string();
1174 }
1175
1176 // A digest is not a secret, and `07-security.md` makes checksum
1177 // verification a security gate. The most useful thing `e2` can write when
1178 // that gate fails is expected-versus-actual, and until this carve-out
1179 // existed both sides came out as `[redacted]` — a gate that reports it
1180 // failed and refuses to say how.
1181 if let Some(digest) = as_sha256_digest(value) {
1182 return digest;
1183 }
1184
1185 if looks_like_jwt(value) {
1186 return REDACTION.to_string();
1187 }
1188
1189 if value.len() >= OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD && value.chars().all(is_opaque_char) {
1190 return REDACTION.to_string();
1191 }
1192
1193 value.to_string()
1194}
1195
1196/// Fields whose values are this product's own closed vocabulary: `snake_case`
1197/// constants such as `late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed`.
1198const CLOSED_VOCABULARY_FIELDS: &[&str] = &["kind", "reason"];
1199
1200/// Whether a closed-vocabulary field's value is emitted as it is.
1201///
1202/// The long `reason` constants are over [`OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD`], so the
1203/// opaque-run rule redacted the very field that says what went wrong. Exempt
1204/// only in these fields, never in a message or any other field: there a long
1205/// run is still treated as a secret. Within them, a lowercase `snake_case`
1206/// identifier that does not start with a token prefix is not something a
1207/// credential or a key generator produces.
1208fn is_closed_vocabulary(name: &str, value: &str) -> bool {
1209 CLOSED_VOCABULARY_FIELDS.contains(&name)
1210 && !TOKEN_PREFIXES
1211 .iter()
1212 .any(|prefix| value.starts_with(prefix))
1213 && is_snake_case_identifier(value)
1214}
1215
1216/// Whether a value is lowercase words joined by single underscores.
1217fn is_snake_case_identifier(value: &str) -> bool {
1218 value.contains('_')
1219 && value
1220 .split('_')
1221 .all(|word| !word.is_empty() && word.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_lowercase()))
1222}
1223
1224/// The length of a SHA-256 digest written as lowercase hex.
1225const SHA256_HEX_LEN: usize = 64;
1226
1227/// How much of a digest is shown.
1228///
1229/// 12 is the short-digest convention git and the OCI tooling use: 48 bits, far
1230/// more than enough to tell an expected digest from the one that was actually
1231/// computed, which is the only comparison a checksum failure needs. Truncating
1232/// is also what makes this carve-out safe to have at all — a 64-character
1233/// lowercase hex run is *usually* a digest, but an HMAC-SHA256 signature has
1234/// the same shape, and 12 of its 64 characters are of no use to anybody.
1235const DIGEST_PREFIX_LEN: usize = 12;
1236
1237/// Renders a value that is exactly a lowercase SHA-256 digest as a labelled
1238/// prefix, or `None` when it is not one.
1239///
1240/// Deliberately strict: exactly 64 characters, and lowercase only. An uppercase
1241/// or mixed-case run falls through to the opaque-run rule and is redacted,
1242/// because the narrower this exception is, the less there is to reason about.
1243fn as_sha256_digest(value: &str) -> Option<String> {
1244 let is_digest = value.len() == SHA256_HEX_LEN
1245 && value
1246 .chars()
1247 .all(|c| c.is_ascii_digit() || c.is_ascii_lowercase() && c.is_ascii_hexdigit());
1248
1249 is_digest.then(|| format!("sha256:{}…", &value[..DIGEST_PREFIX_LEN]))
1250}
1251
1252/// The most `.`-separated segments a JSON Web Token has: header, payload,
1253/// signature.
1254const JWT_SEGMENTS: usize = 3;
1255
1256/// Whether a value is a JSON Web Token.
1257///
1258/// The opaque-run rule cannot see one. [`is_opaque_char`] excludes `.`, and a
1259/// JWT is base64url runs joined by two of them, so a 100-character credential
1260/// arrives as three runs that are each under the threshold and prints
1261/// verbatim. `Authorization: Bearer <jwt>` is caught by the scheme-word rule
1262/// and a credential-keyed one by the key rule, so this only ever bit a token
1263/// logged bare or under a name nobody listed — which is what a GitHub App
1264/// installation assertion is when it reaches a log at all.
1265///
1266/// Narrow deliberately, because the obvious fix is the wrong one: adding `.`
1267/// to [`is_opaque_char`] would swallow every long dotted word there is —
1268/// package names, dated filenames, dotted identifiers. A JWT header is
1269/// base64url of `{"alg":…`, which always begins `eyJ`, and that is a
1270/// discriminator ordinary text does not have.
1271fn looks_like_jwt(value: &str) -> bool {
1272 if value.len() < OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD || !value.starts_with("eyJ") {
1273 return false;
1274 }
1275
1276 let mut segments = 0usize;
1277 for segment in value.split('.') {
1278 segments += 1;
1279 if !segment.chars().all(is_opaque_char) {
1280 return false;
1281 }
1282 }
1283
1284 // Two segments as well as three: an unsigned token has an empty signature,
1285 // and the trailing `.` that would have made the third is trimmed as
1286 // wrapping punctuation before this is reached.
1287 (2..=JWT_SEGMENTS).contains(&segments)
1288}
1289
1290fn looks_like_path(value: &str) -> bool {
1291 let bytes = value.as_bytes();
1292
1293 // `C:\Users\…` and `C:/Users/…`.
1294 if bytes.len() >= 3
1295 && bytes[0].is_ascii_alphabetic()
1296 && bytes[1] == b':'
1297 && (bytes[2] == b'\\' || bytes[2] == b'/')
1298 {
1299 return true;
1300 }
1301
1302 // `\\server\share\…`.
1303 if value.starts_with("\\\\") {
1304 return true;
1305 }
1306
1307 // `~/…`.
1308 if value.starts_with("~/") || value.starts_with("~\\") {
1309 return true;
1310 }
1311
1312 // `/var/lib/…`. Two segments required, so a lone `/` and a bare `/tmp`
1313 // stay readable; see the module documentation for why a URL path is caught
1314 // by this too.
1315 if let Some(rest) = value.strip_prefix('/') {
1316 return rest.contains('/') && !rest.is_empty();
1317 }
1318
1319 false
1320}
1321
1322// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1323// The tracing layer
1324// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1325
1326/// The redacted fields recorded on a span, stashed in the span's extensions so
1327/// that an event inside the span can carry them.
1328#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
1329struct SpanFields(Map<String, Value>);
1330
1331/// Collects a `tracing` record into JSON, applying the allowlist and the
1332/// scrubber as it goes.
1333#[derive(Debug, Default)]
1334struct RedactingVisitor {
1335 fields: Map<String, Value>,
1336}
1337
1338impl RedactingVisitor {
1339 fn put_str(&mut self, name: &str, value: &str) {
1340 let rendered = if !is_field_allowed(name) {
1341 REDACTION.to_string()
1342 } else if is_closed_vocabulary(name, value) {
1343 value.to_string()
1344 } else {
1345 redact(value)
1346 };
1347 self.fields
1348 .insert(name.to_string(), Value::String(rendered));
1349 }
1350
1351 fn put_value(&mut self, name: &str, value: Value) {
1352 if is_field_allowed(name) {
1353 self.fields.insert(name.to_string(), value);
1354 } else {
1355 // Numbers and booleans go the same way as strings. A credential is
1356 // never an `i64`, but the rule that makes this sink trustworthy is
1357 // that it has *no* exception for a name nobody listed.
1358 self.fields
1359 .insert(name.to_string(), Value::String(REDACTION.to_string()));
1360 }
1361 }
1362}
1363
1364impl Visit for RedactingVisitor {
1365 fn record_str(&mut self, field: &Field, value: &str) {
1366 self.put_str(field.name(), value);
1367 }
1368
1369 fn record_debug(&mut self, field: &Field, value: &dyn fmt::Debug) {
1370 // The event message arrives here, as `format_args!` output.
1371 self.put_str(field.name(), &format!("{value:?}"));
1372 }
1373
1374 fn record_error(&mut self, field: &Field, value: &(dyn std::error::Error + 'static)) {
1375 self.put_str(field.name(), &value.to_string());
1376 }
1377
1378 fn record_bool(&mut self, field: &Field, value: bool) {
1379 self.put_value(field.name(), Value::Bool(value));
1380 }
1381
1382 fn record_i64(&mut self, field: &Field, value: i64) {
1383 self.put_value(field.name(), Value::from(value));
1384 }
1385
1386 fn record_u64(&mut self, field: &Field, value: u64) {
1387 self.put_value(field.name(), Value::from(value));
1388 }
1389
1390 fn record_f64(&mut self, field: &Field, value: f64) {
1391 self.put_value(field.name(), Value::from(value));
1392 }
1393
1394 fn record_i128(&mut self, field: &Field, value: i128) {
1395 self.put_str(field.name(), &value.to_string());
1396 }
1397
1398 fn record_u128(&mut self, field: &Field, value: u128) {
1399 self.put_str(field.name(), &value.to_string());
1400 }
1401}
1402
1403/// A `tracing` layer that writes one redacted JSON object per event.
1404///
1405/// Written here rather than assembled from `tracing_subscriber::fmt` because
1406/// redaction has to happen *before* formatting, and a `tracing::Event`'s fields
1407/// cannot be rewritten for a downstream formatter to pick up. Owning the
1408/// formatting is what makes "unconditional" true: there is no path from an
1409/// event to the output that does not go through
1410/// [`RedactingVisitor`].
1411#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
1412pub struct RedactingLayer<W> {
1413 writer: W,
1414}
1415
1416impl<W> RedactingLayer<W> {
1417 /// Wraps a writer factory — a file appender, a capture buffer, or
1418 /// `std::io::stderr`.
1419 pub const fn new(writer: W) -> Self {
1420 Self { writer }
1421 }
1422}
1423
1424impl<S, W> Layer<S> for RedactingLayer<W>
1425where
1426 S: Subscriber + for<'a> LookupSpan<'a>,
1427 W: for<'a> tracing_subscriber::fmt::MakeWriter<'a> + 'static,
1428{
1429 fn on_new_span(
1430 &self,
1431 attrs: &tracing::span::Attributes<'_>,
1432 id: &tracing::span::Id,
1433 ctx: Context<'_, S>,
1434 ) {
1435 let mut visitor = RedactingVisitor::default();
1436 attrs.record(&mut visitor);
1437 if let Some(span) = ctx.span(id) {
1438 span.extensions_mut().insert(SpanFields(visitor.fields));
1439 }
1440 }
1441
1442 fn on_record(
1443 &self,
1444 id: &tracing::span::Id,
1445 values: &tracing::span::Record<'_>,
1446 ctx: Context<'_, S>,
1447 ) {
1448 let mut visitor = RedactingVisitor::default();
1449 values.record(&mut visitor);
1450 if let Some(span) = ctx.span(id) {
1451 let mut extensions = span.extensions_mut();
1452 if let Some(existing) = extensions.get_mut::<SpanFields>() {
1453 existing.0.extend(visitor.fields);
1454 } else {
1455 extensions.insert(SpanFields(visitor.fields));
1456 }
1457 }
1458 }
1459
1460 fn on_event(&self, event: &Event<'_>, ctx: Context<'_, S>) {
1461 let mut visitor = RedactingVisitor::default();
1462 event.record(&mut visitor);
1463
1464 let mut record = Map::new();
1465 record.insert(
1466 "timestamp".to_string(),
1467 Value::String(chrono::Utc::now().to_rfc3339()),
1468 );
1469 record.insert(
1470 "level".to_string(),
1471 Value::String(event.metadata().level().to_string()),
1472 );
1473 // Named `logger` and not `target`: `target` is also a domain field —
1474 // the repository or organization a policy points at — and two different
1475 // things under one key is how a diagnostic becomes a puzzle.
1476 record.insert(
1477 "logger".to_string(),
1478 Value::String(event.metadata().target().to_string()),
1479 );
1480 record.insert("fields".to_string(), Value::Object(visitor.fields));
1481
1482 let spans: Vec<Value> = ctx
1483 .event_scope(event)
1484 .into_iter()
1485 .flat_map(tracing_subscriber::registry::Scope::from_root)
1486 .map(|span| {
1487 let mut entry = Map::new();
1488 entry.insert("name".to_string(), Value::String(span.name().to_string()));
1489 if let Some(fields) = span.extensions().get::<SpanFields>() {
1490 entry.insert("fields".to_string(), Value::Object(fields.0.clone()));
1491 }
1492 Value::Object(entry)
1493 })
1494 .collect();
1495 if !spans.is_empty() {
1496 record.insert("spans".to_string(), Value::Array(spans));
1497 }
1498
1499 let mut line = serde_json::to_string(&Value::Object(record)).unwrap_or_else(|_| {
1500 String::from(
1501 r#"{"level":"ERROR","fields":{"message":"a log record could not be encoded"}}"#,
1502 )
1503 });
1504 line.push('\n');
1505
1506 // A failed write to the diagnostics file must not take the agent down,
1507 // and must not be reported through `tracing` either — that would
1508 // recurse straight back into this method.
1509 let mut writer = self.writer.make_writer();
1510 let _ = writer.write_all(line.as_bytes());
1511 let _ = writer.flush();
1512 }
1513}
1514
1515// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1516// Installing the sink
1517// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1518
1519/// Whose diagnostics these are, and therefore which file they go in.
1520///
1521/// # Why the daemon does not share the operator's file
1522///
1523/// On the two Unixes a boot-mode registration runs the daemon as `root` while
1524/// the four application-data directories stay in the operator's profile —
1525/// `05-infrastructure.md` puts them there and `service install` records those
1526/// paths into the plist. So two accounts write into one `logs/` directory, and
1527/// the appender creates its file with the umask default, `0644`. Whichever
1528/// account opened today's file first owns it, and if that was `root` the
1529/// operator's own `runner-manager status` can no longer append to it.
1530///
1531/// That was not a degraded log. `tracing_appender::rolling::daily` **panics**
1532/// when it cannot open the file, so every CLI command on such a host died with
1533/// a backtrace before it did anything — reported on 0.1.17, on a host whose
1534/// daemon had rolled the file over at midnight as `root`:
1535///
1536/// ```text
1537/// thread 'main' panicked at rolling.rs:156:14:
1538/// initializing rolling file appender failed: InitError { context: "failed to
1539/// create log file", source: Os { code: 13, kind: PermissionDenied } }
1540/// ```
1541///
1542/// [`install`] no longer panics — see there — but not panicking would only have
1543/// turned a crash into an operator who never gets diagnostics again. The two
1544/// writers are separated instead, so neither can take the other's file: the
1545/// account that runs the daemon owns [`SERVICE_LOG_STEM`] and the operator owns
1546/// [`OPERATOR_LOG_STEM`], for as long as the registration lives.
1547#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1548pub enum LogRole {
1549 /// A command the operator ran, or a daemon they started in the foreground.
1550 Operator,
1551 /// The daemon a service manager started, which on a boot-mode host is a
1552 /// different account from the operator's.
1553 Service,
1554}
1555
1556/// The file stem [`LogRole::Operator`] writes.
1557pub const OPERATOR_LOG_STEM: &str = "runner-manager.log";
1558/// The file stem [`LogRole::Service`] writes, and what `service status`
1559/// reports as the daemon's log.
1560pub const SERVICE_LOG_STEM: &str = "runner-manager.service.log";
1561
1562impl LogRole {
1563 /// The file stem this role writes, before the appender's date suffix.
1564 #[must_use]
1565 pub const fn file_stem(self) -> &'static str {
1566 match self {
1567 Self::Operator => OPERATOR_LOG_STEM,
1568 Self::Service => SERVICE_LOG_STEM,
1569 }
1570 }
1571}
1572
1573impl fmt::Display for LogRole {
1574 fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
1575 f.write_str(match self {
1576 Self::Operator => "operator",
1577 Self::Service => "service",
1578 })
1579 }
1580}
1581
1582/// The sink could not be installed.
1583#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
1584pub enum LoggingError {
1585 /// The application-data directories could not be created.
1586 ///
1587 /// Carries a [`crate::paths::PathsError`] rather than a bare
1588 /// [`std::io::Error`] because [`install`] creates `logs/` through
1589 /// [`crate::paths::AppPaths::create_all`], which is what applies the `0700`
1590 /// restriction; the source therefore names whichever of the four
1591 /// directories actually failed, and that need not be `logs/`.
1592 #[error("cannot create the log directory {}: {source}", directory.display())]
1593 Directory {
1594 /// The diagnostics directory [`install`] was asked to write into.
1595 directory: PathBuf,
1596 /// The underlying error.
1597 #[source]
1598 source: crate::paths::PathsError,
1599 },
1600
1601 /// No diagnostics file in `logs/` could be opened for appending.
1602 ///
1603 /// Both stems are named because [`install`] tries two — the role's own, and
1604 /// then one qualified by the account — and an operator who is told only
1605 /// about the second would go looking for a file this process never reached
1606 /// for first.
1607 ///
1608 /// The two attempts are composed into one string rather than carried as
1609 /// four fields. As four this variant reached 128 bytes on Windows — where
1610 /// `PathBuf` is wider than on the Unixes — and tripped
1611 /// `clippy::result_large_err`, which is a lint about every *success* path
1612 /// paying for the size of a failure. The message is the same either way,
1613 /// and only this error is ever built.
1614 #[error("cannot open a diagnostics file in {}: {attempts}", directory.display())]
1615 Appender {
1616 /// The diagnostics directory.
1617 directory: PathBuf,
1618 /// Both stems that were tried, and why each was refused.
1619 attempts: String,
1620 },
1621
1622 /// A global subscriber was already installed.
1623 #[error("a tracing subscriber is already installed for this process: {message}")]
1624 AlreadyInstalled {
1625 /// What `tracing_subscriber` said.
1626 message: String,
1627 },
1628}
1629
1630/// Keeps the background log-writing thread alive.
1631///
1632/// Dropping it flushes and stops that thread, so the value must be held for as
1633/// long as the program expects its diagnostics to be written. Losing it is a
1634/// silent, total loss of logs, which is why it is `#[must_use]`.
1635#[must_use = "dropping the guard stops the log writer and silently discards later diagnostics"]
1636#[derive(Debug)]
1637pub struct LoggingGuard {
1638 _worker: tracing_appender::non_blocking::WorkerGuard,
1639}
1640
1641/// Installs the redacting sink as this process's global subscriber, writing
1642/// daily-rotating files into `logs/`.
1643///
1644/// `role` decides the file, for the reason [`LogRole`] gives. `default_filter`
1645/// applies when `RUST_LOG` is unset or unparseable.
1646///
1647/// # Errors
1648///
1649/// [`LoggingError::Directory`], [`LoggingError::Appender`] and
1650/// [`LoggingError::AlreadyInstalled`]. **None of them is fatal to the caller**,
1651/// and the CLI treats all three as a warning: a `host show` that refused to
1652/// print a capacity because a log file could not be opened would be a worse
1653/// failure than the one it was reporting.
1654pub fn install(
1655 paths: &crate::paths::AppPaths,
1656 role: LogRole,
1657 default_filter: &str,
1658) -> Result<LoggingGuard, LoggingError> {
1659 use tracing_subscriber::layer::SubscriberExt as _;
1660 use tracing_subscriber::util::SubscriberInitExt as _;
1661
1662 // `AppPaths::create_all`, not `create_dir_all`. The claim `create_all`
1663 // documents — that a diagnostics file is not readable by other local
1664 // accounts — is only true if `logs/` is created at `0700`, and this is the
1665 // path a running daemon actually takes. Creating the directory here with a
1666 // bare `create_dir_all` left it at the umask default whenever `install`
1667 // won the race to create it, and `tracing_appender` then wrote 0644 files
1668 // into it: the invariant held in the test that asserts it and nowhere else.
1669 let directory = paths.logs_dir().to_path_buf();
1670 paths
1671 .create_all()
1672 .map_err(|source| LoggingError::Directory {
1673 directory: directory.clone(),
1674 source,
1675 })?;
1676
1677 let appender = open_appender(&directory, role)?;
1678 let (writer, worker) = tracing_appender::non_blocking(appender);
1679
1680 let filter = tracing_subscriber::EnvFilter::try_from_default_env()
1681 .unwrap_or_else(|_| tracing_subscriber::EnvFilter::new(default_filter));
1682
1683 tracing_subscriber::registry()
1684 .with(filter)
1685 .with(RedactingLayer::new(writer))
1686 .try_init()
1687 .map_err(|error| LoggingError::AlreadyInstalled {
1688 message: error.to_string(),
1689 })?;
1690
1691 Ok(LoggingGuard { _worker: worker })
1692}
1693
1694/// Opens today's diagnostics file, falling back to one only this account can
1695/// have created.
1696///
1697/// # Why there is a second attempt at all
1698///
1699/// [`LogRole`] keeps the daemon and the operator apart, which is enough on a
1700/// host where nothing else ever writes here. Two things still put a file the
1701/// caller cannot append to under the stem it wants:
1702///
1703/// 1. **A privileged command.** Signing in to the machine-scoped store is
1704/// `sudo runner-manager auth login`, and that run writes the *operator's*
1705/// stem as `root`. Every unprivileged command for the rest of that day then
1706/// finds a `root`-owned file under it.
1707/// 2. **A host upgraded into this change.** Files written before the roles were
1708/// split are all under [`OPERATOR_LOG_STEM`], and on a boot-mode host the
1709/// ones from the last few days belong to `root`.
1710///
1711/// Neither is worth losing diagnostics over, and neither can be repaired from
1712/// inside an unprivileged process — it may not chown the file, may not change
1713/// its mode, and must not delete an existing log. So it writes beside it, under
1714/// a stem carrying this account's identity, which no other account will choose.
1715///
1716/// The fallback is deliberately *not* the first choice. A file named after
1717/// whoever happened to open it first is a file an operator has to go looking
1718/// for; the plain stem stays the plain stem, and the qualified one appears only
1719/// on a host that has the collision.
1720fn open_appender(
1721 directory: &Path,
1722 role: LogRole,
1723) -> Result<tracing_appender::rolling::RollingFileAppender, LoggingError> {
1724 let stem = role.file_stem();
1725 let first = match build_appender(directory, stem) {
1726 Ok(appender) => return Ok(appender),
1727 Err(error) => error,
1728 };
1729
1730 let qualified = account_qualified_stem(stem);
1731 match build_appender(directory, &qualified) {
1732 Ok(appender) => Ok(appender),
1733 // Both stems are named. An operator told only about the second would go
1734 // looking for a file this process never reached for first.
1735 Err(second) => Err(LoggingError::Appender {
1736 directory: directory.to_path_buf(),
1737 attempts: format!(
1738 "neither {stem}.<date> ({first}) nor {qualified}.<date> ({second}) could be \
1739 appended to"
1740 ),
1741 }),
1742 }
1743}
1744
1745/// One attempt, through the constructor that **returns** its failure.
1746///
1747/// `tracing_appender::rolling::daily` is the same thing with an `.expect` on
1748/// the end, and that `.expect` is a panic in the middle of an operator's `status`
1749/// command. The whole reason this function exists is that the builder hands the
1750/// error back instead.
1751fn build_appender(
1752 directory: &Path,
1753 stem: &str,
1754) -> Result<tracing_appender::rolling::RollingFileAppender, String> {
1755 tracing_appender::rolling::RollingFileAppender::builder()
1756 .rotation(tracing_appender::rolling::Rotation::DAILY)
1757 .filename_prefix(stem)
1758 .build(directory)
1759 .map_err(|error| error.to_string())
1760}
1761
1762/// `runner-manager.log` becomes `runner-manager.<account>.log`.
1763///
1764/// The stem carries its own `.log`, so the account goes before it rather than
1765/// after: the appender appends `.<date>`, and `runner-manager.log.uid-501` would
1766/// read as a rotated file rather than as another account's.
1767fn account_qualified_stem(stem: &str) -> String {
1768 let account = account_tag();
1769 match stem.rsplit_once('.') {
1770 Some((head, tail)) => format!("{head}.{account}.{tail}"),
1771 None => format!("{stem}.{account}"),
1772 }
1773}
1774
1775/// Something stable, filename-safe, and different for every local account.
1776///
1777/// The numeric effective user id rather than a name: it needs no lookup, cannot
1778/// contain a path separator, and is the identity the filesystem actually
1779/// compared when it refused the open.
1780#[cfg(unix)]
1781fn account_tag() -> String {
1782 // SAFETY: `geteuid` takes no argument, touches no memory this process owns,
1783 // and is documented never to fail.
1784 let uid = unsafe { libc::geteuid() };
1785 format!("uid-{uid}")
1786}
1787
1788/// As the Unix half, from the one identity Windows exposes without a lookup.
1789///
1790/// Sanitized rather than trusted: this becomes a file name, and `USERNAME` is
1791/// an ordinary environment variable that a caller may set to anything at all,
1792/// including something holding a path separator.
1793#[cfg(windows)]
1794fn account_tag() -> String {
1795 let raw = std::env::var("USERNAME").unwrap_or_default();
1796 let safe: String = raw
1797 .chars()
1798 .filter(|c| c.is_ascii_alphanumeric() || *c == '-' || *c == '_')
1799 .take(32)
1800 .collect();
1801 if safe.is_empty() {
1802 "other-account".to_string()
1803 } else {
1804 format!("user-{safe}")
1805 }
1806}
1807
1808#[cfg(test)]
1809mod tests {
1810 use super::*;
1811
1812 use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
1813
1814 use tracing_subscriber::layer::SubscriberExt as _;
1815
1816 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
1817 // Capturing what the sink actually wrote
1818 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
1819
1820 #[derive(Clone, Default)]
1821 struct Capture(Arc<Mutex<Vec<u8>>>);
1822
1823 impl Capture {
1824 fn text(&self) -> String {
1825 String::from_utf8_lossy(&self.0.lock().expect("not poisoned")).into_owned()
1826 }
1827 }
1828
1829 struct CaptureWriter(Arc<Mutex<Vec<u8>>>);
1830
1831 impl Write for CaptureWriter {
1832 fn write(&mut self, buf: &[u8]) -> std::io::Result<usize> {
1833 self.0.lock().expect("not poisoned").extend_from_slice(buf);
1834 Ok(buf.len())
1835 }
1836
1837 fn flush(&mut self) -> std::io::Result<()> {
1838 Ok(())
1839 }
1840 }
1841
1842 impl<'a> tracing_subscriber::fmt::MakeWriter<'a> for Capture {
1843 type Writer = CaptureWriter;
1844
1845 fn make_writer(&'a self) -> Self::Writer {
1846 CaptureWriter(Arc::clone(&self.0))
1847 }
1848 }
1849
1850 /// A sink with the same plumbing and no redaction at all.
1851 ///
1852 /// Exists so that `the_scan_catches_a_sink_that_does_not_redact` can prove
1853 /// the secret-injection scan below is capable of failing. Without it, a scan
1854 /// that found nothing would be indistinguishable from a scan that looked
1855 /// nowhere.
1856 #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
1857 struct PassthroughLayer<W>(W);
1858
1859 #[derive(Default)]
1860 struct PassthroughVisitor(Map<String, Value>);
1861
1862 impl Visit for PassthroughVisitor {
1863 fn record_str(&mut self, field: &Field, value: &str) {
1864 self.0
1865 .insert(field.name().to_string(), Value::String(value.to_string()));
1866 }
1867
1868 fn record_debug(&mut self, field: &Field, value: &dyn fmt::Debug) {
1869 self.0.insert(
1870 field.name().to_string(),
1871 Value::String(format!("{value:?}")),
1872 );
1873 }
1874 }
1875
1876 impl<S, W> Layer<S> for PassthroughLayer<W>
1877 where
1878 S: Subscriber + for<'a> LookupSpan<'a>,
1879 W: for<'a> tracing_subscriber::fmt::MakeWriter<'a> + 'static,
1880 {
1881 fn on_event(&self, event: &Event<'_>, _ctx: Context<'_, S>) {
1882 let mut visitor = PassthroughVisitor::default();
1883 event.record(&mut visitor);
1884 let mut line = serde_json::to_string(&Value::Object(visitor.0)).unwrap_or_default();
1885 line.push('\n');
1886 let _ = self.0.make_writer().write_all(line.as_bytes());
1887 }
1888 }
1889
1890 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
1891 // The secret-injection log scan (`07-security.md`, security gate)
1892 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
1893
1894 /// A user access token, in GitHub's user-to-server format.
1895 const USER_TOKEN: &str = "ghu_16C7e42F292c6912E7710c838347Ae178B4a";
1896 /// An installation-style token, to prove the prefix rule is not one-off.
1897 const SERVER_TOKEN: &str = "ghs_1CGGYnBAtn5ov3M0aTHhP7l3ZKuMhIB3pnPd";
1898 /// A fine-grained personal access token.
1899 const FINE_GRAINED: &str =
1900 "github_pat_11ABCDEFG0abcdefghijkl_ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA9876543210zyxwv";
1901 /// Stands in for an encoded JIT configuration: base64, and long.
1902 const JIT_BLOB: &str = "eyJhZ2VudE5hbWUiOiJydW5uZXItbWFuYWdlciIsImVuY29kZWQiOiJhYmNkZWZnaGlqa2xtbm9wcXJzdHV2d3h5ejAxMjM0NTY3ODkrLz09In0=";
1903 /// A workspace path, which `07-security.md` also requires redacted.
1904 const WORKSPACE: &str = "/var/lib/runner-manager/runtime/9f2c/attempt-1";
1905 /// The same, on the platform the persona is least likely to be using but
1906 /// the CI matrix definitely is.
1907 const WINDOWS_WORKSPACE: &str = r"C:\Users\operator\AppData\Local\runner-manager\runtime\9f2c";
1908 /// A GitHub App installation assertion: a JSON Web Token.
1909 ///
1910 /// Its two `.` separators are the point. `is_opaque_char` excludes `.`, so
1911 /// the opaque-run rule sees three short runs rather than one long one, and
1912 /// every other secret here is caught by that rule when it stands alone.
1913 const JWT: &str = "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.\
1914 eyJpc3MiOiIxMjM0NTYiLCJpYXQiOjE3MDAwMDAwMDAsImV4cCI6MTcwMDAwMDYwMH0.\
1915 c2lnbmF0dXJlLXRoYXQtaXMtb3BhcXVlLWFuZC1sb25nLWVub3VnaC10by1tYXR0ZXI";
1916
1917 /// An error whose `Debug` carries the HTTP body it was given.
1918 ///
1919 /// This is the shape `d2`'s secret store and `d3`'s installer will hand to
1920 /// `tracing::error!(reason = ?err)`, and it is not the same shape as any of
1921 /// the JSON above: `Debug` on a `String` escapes the quotes inside it, so
1922 /// the keys arrive spelled `\"password\"` rather than `"password"`.
1923 #[derive(Debug)]
1924 struct StoreError {
1925 body: String,
1926 }
1927
1928 fn secrets() -> Vec<&'static str> {
1929 vec![
1930 USER_TOKEN,
1931 SERVER_TOKEN,
1932 FINE_GRAINED,
1933 JIT_BLOB,
1934 JWT,
1935 WORKSPACE,
1936 WINDOWS_WORKSPACE,
1937 ]
1938 }
1939
1940 /// Routes every secret through `sink` in every shape a caller might use,
1941 /// and reports the first one that came out the other side.
1942 ///
1943 /// A helper returning `Result` rather than a test body, because the same
1944 /// injection has to be run against a deliberately non-redacting sink to
1945 /// show that it is capable of finding anything at all.
1946 fn scan_for_leaks<L>(layer: L, capture: &Capture) -> Result<String, String>
1947 where
1948 L: Layer<tracing_subscriber::Registry> + Send + Sync + 'static,
1949 {
1950 let subscriber = tracing_subscriber::registry().with(layer);
1951
1952 tracing::subscriber::with_default(subscriber, || {
1953 for secret in secrets() {
1954 // 1. In the message body, which is the one field that must be
1955 // allowed and therefore cannot be protected by the allowlist.
1956 tracing::info!("starting runner with {secret}");
1957
1958 // 2. As a credential header in the message body, scheme and all.
1959 tracing::info!("request failed; Authorization: Bearer {secret}");
1960 tracing::warn!("retrying with x-api-key={secret}");
1961
1962 // 3. In a field nobody listed — the case that must be safe with
1963 // no edit to this file.
1964 tracing::info!(runner_token = %secret, "registered");
1965
1966 // 4. In a field that *is* listed, which is where the allowlist
1967 // alone would not save anything.
1968 tracing::info!(outcome = %secret, event = "started", "registered");
1969 tracing::info!(message = %secret, "ignored");
1970
1971 // 5. Through `Debug` rather than `Display`.
1972 tracing::info!(?secret, "debug shaped");
1973
1974 // 6. Embedded in a structured value rather than standing
1975 // alone. Every shape above presents the secret as its
1976 // own whitespace-delimited word, which is the one shape
1977 // the opaque-run rule catches for free -- so the scan
1978 // could pass while the sink leaked anything embedded.
1979 // Compact JSON is what `serde_json::to_string` emits and
1980 // what an HTTP error body arrives as, and it was emitted
1981 // verbatim: `redact_core` recursed into the value for
1982 // `=` only, and the JSON quote left the key spelled
1983 // `encoded_jit_config"`, which is not on CREDENTIAL_KEYS.
1984 for key in ["encoded_jit_config", "runner_token", "pat"] {
1985 tracing::error!("registration failed: {{\"{key}\":\"{secret}\"}}");
1986 tracing::error!("registration failed: {{ \"{key}\": \"{secret}\" }}");
1987 tracing::error!("registration failed: {key}:{secret}");
1988 }
1989
1990 // 7. An `Authorization` header value, in the same three
1991 // embedded shapes.
1992 tracing::error!("response: {{\"authorization\":\"Bearer {secret}\"}}");
1993 tracing::error!("response: {{ \"authorization\": \"Bearer {secret}\" }}");
1994 tracing::error!("response: authorization:Bearer {secret}");
1995
1996 // 9. A compact object with **more than one field**, the
1997 // credential key second. Shape 6 above differs from this by
1998 // field order and by nothing else, and `serde_json::to_string`
1999 // is what chooses the order -- so shape 6 could pass while an
2000 // error body from a struct with two fields leaked. The rules
2001 // split a word once, on the first separator they find, so
2002 // only `runner_id` was ever examined.
2003 for key in ["encoded_jit_config", "runner_token", "access_token"] {
2004 tracing::error!(
2005 "registration failed: {{\"runner_id\":42,\"{key}\":\"{secret}\"}}"
2006 );
2007 tracing::error!(
2008 "registration failed: {{\"status\":422,\"message\":\"bad\",\"{key}\":\"{secret}\"}}"
2009 );
2010 // The spaced spelling of the same thing, which was already
2011 // safe -- by accident, because the value is its own word.
2012 tracing::error!(
2013 "registration failed: {{ \"runner_id\": 42, \"{key}\": \"{secret}\" }}"
2014 );
2015 }
2016
2017 // 10. Nested, one level and two. The value recursion goes to
2018 // `redact_value`, which is a leaf and never re-enters
2019 // `redact_core`, so an object inside an object was emitted
2020 // whole.
2021 tracing::error!("response: {{\"body\":{{\"runner_token\":\"{secret}\"}}}}");
2022 tracing::error!(
2023 "response: {{\"error\":{{\"status\":422,\"body\":{{\"encoded_jit_config\":\"{secret}\"}}}}}}"
2024 );
2025
2026 // 11. A form-encoded body with the credential parameter second.
2027 // `&` was not a separator this module knew, so the whole
2028 // body was one word and only `scope` was ever judged.
2029 tracing::error!("token exchange failed: scope=repo&access_token={secret}");
2030 tracing::error!(
2031 "token exchange failed: grant_type=refresh&refresh_token={secret}&scope=repo"
2032 );
2033
2034 // 12. Backslash-escaped JSON, through `Debug` rather than
2035 // `Display`. Shape 5 is also `Debug`, but it puts the
2036 // secret on an *unlisted* field, which is dropped wholesale
2037 // -- so the `Debug` lens and the compact-JSON lens were both
2038 // here and had never been crossed. `reason` is allowed, so
2039 // this one reaches the scrubber, with its keys spelled
2040 // `\"runner_token\"`.
2041 let failure = StoreError {
2042 body: format!("{{\"runner_token\":\"{secret}\"}}"),
2043 };
2044 tracing::error!(reason = ?failure, "the secret store rejected the request");
2045
2046 // 13. A URL earlier in the same word. `redact_core` split on the
2047 // first `://` and handed everything before it to
2048 // `redact_url` as a "scheme" and everything after it as
2049 // the URL -- and the terminal arm of `redact_url` echoes
2050 // both verbatim. So one URL anywhere in a word put the
2051 // whole of the rest of that word beyond every rule below.
2052 // `documentation_url` is in essentially every GitHub REST
2053 // error body, which makes that "any error body logged
2054 // alongside a credential".
2055 tracing::error!(
2056 "api failed: {{\"message\":\"Bad credentials\",\"documentation_url\":\"https://docs.github.com/rest\",\"token\":\"{secret}\"}}"
2057 );
2058 // The reverse order leaked for the mirror reason: everything
2059 // before the `://` became the scheme, and was echoed.
2060 tracing::error!(
2061 "api failed: {{\"token\":\"{secret}\",\"documentation_url\":\"https://docs.github.com/rest\"}}"
2062 );
2063 // A nested object behind a URL, which is the shape a clone
2064 // failure arrives in.
2065 tracing::error!(
2066 "clone failed: {{\"remote\":\"https://github.com/o/r.git\",\"body\":{{\"password\":\"{secret}\"}}}}"
2067 );
2068
2069 // 14. A value with no key of its own: an array element. The
2070 // structural cut recursed on the *raw* fragment, and the
2071 // terminal fallback then handed it to `redact_value` with
2072 // its quote still attached -- so `"ghu_…` failed
2073 // `starts_with("ghu_")`, failed `is_opaque_char` on the
2074 // quote, failed the `eyJ` test, and failed
2075 // `looks_like_path`. This is shape 9's defect one step
2076 // down: "only the first pair is examined" became "a value
2077 // with no key of its own is never examined", and it
2078 // survived because there was no array among the twelve
2079 // shapes above.
2080 tracing::error!("registration failed: {{\"tokens\":[\"{secret}\",\"x\"]}}");
2081 tracing::error!("registration failed: {{\"tokens\":[\"x\",\"{secret}\"]}}");
2082 tracing::error!("registration failed: [\"x\",\"{secret}\"]");
2083 tracing::error!("registration failed: [{{\"id\":1}},[\"{secret}\"]]");
2084 let listed = StoreError {
2085 body: format!("{{\"tokens\":[\"x\",\"{secret}\"]}}"),
2086 };
2087 tracing::error!(reason = ?listed, "the secret store rejected the list");
2088
2089 // 15. `;` as the separator. It is in `WRAPPERS`, so it was
2090 // recognised as punctuation, and it was not in
2091 // `STRUCTURAL`, so it never cut a word. It is what
2092 // separates the pairs of a Windows connection string, of a
2093 // credential string, and of a cookie header written
2094 // without a space -- `d2`'s territory exactly.
2095 tracing::error!("store rejected: Server=host;Database=x;Password={secret};");
2096 tracing::error!("store rejected: user=operator;password={secret}");
2097 tracing::error!("store rejected: theme=dark;session={secret}");
2098
2099 // 16. Wrapped in an element rather than in a quote.
2100 // `split_wrappers` strips only the *outermost* `<` and
2101 // `>`, so `<string>…</string>` arrived as
2102 // `string>…</string`, which matches no rule at all. `d3`'s
2103 // installers handle launchd plists, which is where this
2104 // shape comes from.
2105 tracing::error!("plist rejected: <string>{secret}</string>");
2106 tracing::error!("plist rejected: <key>token</key><string>{secret}</string>");
2107
2108 // 17. A `;` or an `&` *after a URL in the same word*. This is
2109 // shape 15 and shape 11 with one thing changed: a URL
2110 // earlier in the word. `STRUCTURAL` has nine characters and
2111 // `is_url_terminator` recognised seven of them -- `;` and
2112 // `&` were missing -- and the URL branch runs *ahead* of
2113 // the structural cut. So `split_url` swallowed everything
2114 // to the next terminator, including the separator that
2115 // would have cut the word, and `redact_url`'s terminal arm
2116 // echoed it verbatim.
2117 //
2118 // The L3 fix (bounding the URL) and the L1 fix (cutting on
2119 // `;` and `&`) each work alone and did not compose: this
2120 // commit added `;` to `STRUCTURAL` *for connection strings*
2121 // while leaving the path a URL opens straight through it.
2122 // A connection string whose `Server=` is a URL is exactly
2123 // `d2`'s shape, and a systemd `Environment=` line is
2124 // `d3`'s.
2125 tracing::error!(
2126 "store rejected: Server=https://vault.local/api;Password={secret};"
2127 );
2128 tracing::error!("keychain error: url=https://kc.local;secret={secret}");
2129 tracing::error!("unit rejected: Environment=API=https://a.com/v1;TOKEN={secret}");
2130 tracing::error!("token exchange failed: cb=https://a.com/x&access_token={secret}");
2131 tracing::error!(
2132 "dsn rejected: dsn=https://sentry.local/1;password={secret};user=x"
2133 );
2134 tracing::error!(
2135 "callback failed: redirect=https://a.com/cb&state=1&access_token={secret}"
2136 );
2137 let routed = StoreError {
2138 body: format!("Server=https://vault.local/api;Password={secret};"),
2139 };
2140 tracing::error!(reason = ?routed, "the secret store rejected the connection string");
2141
2142 // 18. A credential key whose value is not in its own fragment.
2143 // The empty-value skip is right, but its justification --
2144 // "the value is in the next fragment, where the structural
2145 // cut reaches it" -- was false: `redact_fragment` carried
2146 // nothing across the cut, so nothing ever reached it. An
2147 // array, a nested object, an empty pair and a plist
2148 // key/value pair are four spellings of the same gap.
2149 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":[\"{secret}\"]}}");
2150 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":{{\"v\":\"{secret}\"}}}}");
2151 tracing::error!("store rejected: Password=;{secret}");
2152 tracing::error!("plist rejected: <key>password</key><string>{secret}</string>");
2153
2154 // 19. A structural character *inside* a credential value. `,`
2155 // and `&` could already split a secret; this commit added
2156 // `;`, `<` and `>`, so each of those became a new character
2157 // that can cut a punctuated password in half and leave the
2158 // tail standing.
2159 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":\"a<{secret}>b\"}}");
2160 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":\"a&{secret},b\"}}");
2161
2162 // 20. A secret in a URL *path*. `redact_url` applies no shape
2163 // rule to the path at all, so a token that reaches one is
2164 // echoed whole -- and the token-prefix rule is documented
2165 // as a belt that catches a credential anywhere.
2166 //
2167 // The two workspace paths are excluded, and the exclusion
2168 // is a real limitation rather than a convenience. A path is
2169 // judged one segment at a time, because judging the whole
2170 // of a URL path with `looks_like_path` would redact every
2171 // URL with two segments in it -- which is the
2172 // over-redaction the module documentation explicitly
2173 // promises a full URL escapes. A filesystem path pasted
2174 // into a URL path is therefore indistinguishable from an
2175 // ordinary deep URL path: `/var/lib/…` and `/repos/o/r/…`
2176 // are the same shape, segment by segment. A *credential* in
2177 // a path is caught, because a credential has a shape of its
2178 // own; a path in a path is not.
2179 if !looks_like_path(secret) {
2180 tracing::error!("download failed: https://github.com/o/r/raw/{secret}/f");
2181 tracing::error!("download failed: https://github.com/o/r/raw/{secret}");
2182 }
2183
2184 // 8. Carried on a span rather than on the event.
2185 let span = tracing::info_span!("attempt", jit_config = %secret);
2186 let _entered = span.enter();
2187 tracing::info!(event = "inside_span", "in a span");
2188 }
2189 });
2190
2191 let output = capture.text();
2192 for secret in secrets() {
2193 for needle in needles(secret) {
2194 if output.contains(&needle) {
2195 return Err(format!(
2196 "the sink emitted a secret verbatim: {secret}\n\
2197 (found as: {needle})\n--- output ---\n{output}"
2198 ));
2199 }
2200 }
2201 }
2202 Ok(output)
2203 }
2204
2205 /// Every spelling a secret can have in the sink's output.
2206 ///
2207 /// The sink writes JSON, so a secret containing a character `serde_json`
2208 /// escapes never appears in the output as it was written. `WINDOWS_WORKSPACE`
2209 /// is a raw string with single backslashes and is emitted with doubled ones,
2210 /// so scanning for the literal could not have matched it — not even against
2211 /// `PassthroughLayer`, which redacts nothing at all. The path really is
2212 /// redacted, so this was a hole in the coverage rather than a leak, but a
2213 /// needle that cannot match is a check that cannot fail.
2214 fn needles(secret: &str) -> Vec<String> {
2215 // Strip the quotes `to_string` adds; what is left is the text exactly
2216 // as it appears inside a JSON string literal.
2217 let escape = |text: &str| {
2218 let json = serde_json::to_string(text).expect("a string is serialisable");
2219 json[1..json.len() - 1].to_string()
2220 };
2221
2222 let once = escape(secret);
2223 // Twice, because a secret can be escaped twice on the way out, and
2224 // shape 12 is where that happens: `Debug` on a `String` escapes the
2225 // quotes *and* the backslashes inside it, and the sink then
2226 // JSON-encodes what `Debug` produced. A Windows path arrives in that
2227 // line with four backslashes where the secret has one, so the
2228 // once-escaped needle cannot match it there -- not even against
2229 // `PassthroughLayer`, which redacts nothing at all. That cell of the
2230 // matrix was a check incapable of failing, which is the same defect
2231 // this helper was written to fix one level down.
2232 let twice = escape(&once);
2233
2234 let mut spellings = vec![secret.to_string(), once, twice];
2235 // Consecutive-only is enough: each level of escaping is a superset of
2236 // the last, so equal spellings are always adjacent.
2237 spellings.dedup();
2238 spellings
2239 }
2240
2241 #[test]
2242 fn the_scan_looks_for_a_needle_that_can_actually_occur() {
2243 // Guards the helper above: if `needles` ever stops producing the
2244 // JSON-escaped spelling, the Windows workspace silently stops being
2245 // scanned for and every assertion about it becomes vacuous.
2246 let windows = needles(WINDOWS_WORKSPACE);
2247 assert_eq!(
2248 windows.len(),
2249 3,
2250 "a backslash path has three spellings, one per level of escaping it \
2251 can pass through on the way out: {windows:?}"
2252 );
2253 assert!(
2254 windows[1].contains(r"\\Users\\operator"),
2255 "the once-escaped spelling is what an ordinary JSON line contains: {windows:?}"
2256 );
2257 assert!(
2258 windows[2].contains(r"\\\\Users\\\\operator"),
2259 "the twice-escaped spelling is what a Debug rendering inside a JSON \
2260 line contains: {windows:?}"
2261 );
2262
2263 // The third spelling is not hypothetical: it is exactly what the sink
2264 // writes for shape 12, and without it that cell of the scan was a
2265 // check that could not fail.
2266 let shape_twelve = serde_json::to_string(&Value::String(format!(
2267 "{:?}",
2268 StoreError {
2269 body: format!("{{\"runner_token\":\"{WINDOWS_WORKSPACE}\"}}"),
2270 }
2271 )))
2272 .expect("serialisable");
2273 assert!(
2274 shape_twelve.contains(&windows[2]),
2275 "the twice-escaped needle must be findable in what shape 12 emits: {shape_twelve}"
2276 );
2277 assert!(
2278 !shape_twelve.contains(&windows[1]),
2279 "and the once-escaped one must not be, or the gap was never there: {shape_twelve}"
2280 );
2281
2282 // Confirms the premise: the raw spelling genuinely cannot occur in the
2283 // sink's output, which is why scanning only for it proved nothing.
2284 let rendered = serde_json::to_string(&Value::String(WINDOWS_WORKSPACE.to_string()))
2285 .expect("serialisable");
2286 assert!(
2287 !rendered.contains(WINDOWS_WORKSPACE),
2288 "if this ever contains the raw path, the original scan was fine after all: {rendered}"
2289 );
2290 assert!(rendered.contains(&windows[1]), "{rendered}");
2291
2292 // A secret with nothing to escape has exactly one spelling.
2293 assert_eq!(needles(USER_TOKEN), vec![USER_TOKEN.to_string()]);
2294 }
2295
2296 #[test]
2297 fn the_secret_injection_scan_finds_nothing() {
2298 let capture = Capture::default();
2299 let output = scan_for_leaks(RedactingLayer::new(capture.clone()), &capture)
2300 .unwrap_or_else(|complaint| panic!("{complaint}"));
2301
2302 // Something must have been written, or "no secrets found" is trivially
2303 // true and means nothing.
2304 assert!(!output.trim().is_empty(), "the sink wrote nothing at all");
2305 assert!(
2306 output.contains(REDACTION),
2307 "nothing was redacted, so nothing was routed through the sink:\n{output}"
2308 );
2309 }
2310
2311 #[test]
2312 fn the_scan_catches_a_sink_that_does_not_redact() {
2313 let capture = Capture::default();
2314 let complaint = scan_for_leaks(PassthroughLayer(capture.clone()), &capture)
2315 .expect_err("a sink with no redaction must be caught");
2316 assert!(
2317 complaint.contains("emitted a secret verbatim"),
2318 "the complaint must name the failure mode: {complaint}"
2319 );
2320 }
2321
2322 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2323 // The allowlist
2324 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2325
2326 fn emit(capture: &Capture, body: impl FnOnce()) -> String {
2327 let subscriber = tracing_subscriber::registry().with(RedactingLayer::new(capture.clone()));
2328 tracing::subscriber::with_default(subscriber, body);
2329 capture.text()
2330 }
2331
2332 #[test]
2333 fn a_field_nobody_listed_is_redacted_by_default() {
2334 let capture = Capture::default();
2335 let output = emit(&capture, || {
2336 tracing::info!(
2337 a_field_added_by_a_later_task = "supersecret-value",
2338 "an event"
2339 );
2340 });
2341
2342 assert!(
2343 !output.contains("supersecret-value"),
2344 "an unlisted field leaked its value:\n{output}"
2345 );
2346 assert!(output.contains(REDACTION), "{output}");
2347 // The name survives: knowing the field was there is useful, and a field
2348 // name is not a credential.
2349 assert!(
2350 output.contains("a_field_added_by_a_later_task"),
2351 "the field name should be kept:\n{output}"
2352 );
2353 }
2354
2355 #[test]
2356 fn an_unlisted_numeric_field_is_redacted_too() {
2357 // The rule has no exception for a type, because "a credential is never
2358 // an integer" is exactly the kind of reasoning that stops being true
2359 // once somebody logs an installation-scoped identifier they should not.
2360 let capture = Capture::default();
2361 let output = emit(&capture, || {
2362 tracing::info!(unlisted_number = 8_675_309_u64, "an event");
2363 });
2364 assert!(!output.contains("8675309"), "{output}");
2365 assert!(output.contains(REDACTION), "{output}");
2366 }
2367
2368 #[test]
2369 fn listed_fields_survive() {
2370 let capture = Capture::default();
2371 let output = emit(&capture, || {
2372 tracing::info!(
2373 event = "reconciled",
2374 policy_id = "9f2c1a44-0000-4000-8000-000000000001",
2375 count = 3,
2376 outcome = "started",
2377 "reconciliation finished"
2378 );
2379 });
2380
2381 for expected in [
2382 "reconciled",
2383 "9f2c1a44-0000-4000-8000-000000000001",
2384 "started",
2385 "reconciliation finished",
2386 ] {
2387 assert!(
2388 output.contains(expected),
2389 "{expected} missing from:\n{output}"
2390 );
2391 }
2392 assert!(output.contains("\"count\":3"), "{output}");
2393 }
2394
2395 /// The rate-limit warning's fields and a long closed-vocabulary reason
2396 /// reach the log, rather than `[redacted]` in place of the diagnosis.
2397 #[test]
2398 fn non_secret_diagnostic_fields_survive() {
2399 let capture = Capture::default();
2400 let output = emit(&capture, || {
2401 tracing::warn!(
2402 kind = "secondary",
2403 delay_secs = 61_u64,
2404 remaining = 0_u64,
2405 reason = "late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed",
2406 "rate limited"
2407 );
2408 });
2409 for expected in [
2410 "\"kind\":\"secondary\"",
2411 "\"delay_secs\":61",
2412 "\"remaining\":0",
2413 "\"reason\":\"late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed\"",
2414 ] {
2415 assert!(
2416 output.contains(expected),
2417 "{expected} missing from:
2418{output}"
2419 );
2420 }
2421 }
2422
2423 /// The carve-out is for identifiers in closed-vocabulary fields, not for
2424 /// anything long with an underscore in it, and not for message text.
2425 #[test]
2426 fn only_a_snake_case_reason_field_escapes_the_opaque_rule() {
2427 let reason = "late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed";
2428 assert!(is_closed_vocabulary("reason", reason));
2429 assert!(!is_closed_vocabulary("message", reason));
2430 assert_eq!(redact(reason), REDACTION, "free text kept a long run");
2431 for opaque in [
2432 // A capital, a digit, a doubled or trailing underscore, and no
2433 // underscore at all: each is a shape a secret can take.
2434 "late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_Removed",
2435 "late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed2",
2436 "late_ephemeral__workspace_could_not_be_removed",
2437 "late_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed_",
2438 "lateephemeralworkspacecouldnotberemovedquite",
2439 "ghs_ephemeral_workspace_could_not_be_removed",
2440 ] {
2441 assert!(!is_closed_vocabulary("reason", opaque), "{opaque}");
2442 }
2443 }
2444
2445 #[test]
2446 fn the_allowlist_is_sorted_and_has_no_duplicates() {
2447 // `is_field_allowed` uses a binary search, so an unsorted list would not
2448 // merely be untidy — it would silently start redacting fields that are
2449 // on it.
2450 let mut sorted = ALLOWED_FIELDS.to_vec();
2451 sorted.sort_unstable();
2452 assert_eq!(
2453 ALLOWED_FIELDS,
2454 &sorted[..],
2455 "ALLOWED_FIELDS must stay sorted"
2456 );
2457
2458 let mut deduped = sorted.clone();
2459 deduped.dedup();
2460 assert_eq!(sorted.len(), deduped.len(), "ALLOWED_FIELDS has duplicates");
2461
2462 for name in ALLOWED_FIELDS {
2463 assert!(is_field_allowed(name), "{name} is listed but not allowed");
2464 }
2465 assert!(!is_field_allowed("authorization"));
2466 assert!(!is_field_allowed("runner_token"));
2467 }
2468
2469 #[test]
2470 fn every_record_is_one_parseable_json_object_per_line() {
2471 let capture = Capture::default();
2472 let output = emit(&capture, || {
2473 tracing::info!(event = "one", "first");
2474 tracing::warn!(event = "two", "second");
2475 });
2476
2477 let lines: Vec<&str> = output
2478 .lines()
2479 .filter(|line| !line.trim().is_empty())
2480 .collect();
2481 assert_eq!(lines.len(), 2, "{output}");
2482 for line in lines {
2483 let value: Value = serde_json::from_str(line)
2484 .unwrap_or_else(|error| panic!("not JSON: {error}\n{line}"));
2485 assert!(value.get("timestamp").is_some(), "{line}");
2486 assert!(value.get("level").is_some(), "{line}");
2487 assert!(value.get("logger").is_some(), "{line}");
2488 assert!(value.get("fields").is_some(), "{line}");
2489 }
2490 }
2491
2492 #[test]
2493 fn span_fields_are_redacted_and_carried() {
2494 let capture = Capture::default();
2495 let output = emit(&capture, || {
2496 let span = tracing::info_span!("attempt", attempt_id = "abc-123", jit = %JIT_BLOB);
2497 let _entered = span.enter();
2498 tracing::info!(event = "inside", "in the span");
2499 });
2500
2501 assert!(output.contains("\"name\":\"attempt\""), "{output}");
2502 assert!(
2503 output.contains("abc-123"),
2504 "the listed span field survives:\n{output}"
2505 );
2506 assert!(!output.contains(JIT_BLOB), "a span field leaked:\n{output}");
2507 }
2508
2509 /// Asserts that [`install`] created its directories the restrictive way.
2510 ///
2511 /// `install` used to call `std::fs::create_dir_all(logs_dir)` directly.
2512 /// That is invisible on Windows and *nearly* invisible on Unix — the
2513 /// directory exists either way, and `AppPaths::create_all`'s own test still
2514 /// passed, because it tests `create_all` rather than the path a running
2515 /// daemon actually takes. So this checks the two things that distinguish
2516 /// them:
2517 ///
2518 /// 1. **All four directories exist.** `create_dir_all(logs_dir)` makes
2519 /// exactly one. This half runs on every platform, which matters because
2520 /// Windows is the leg most likely to be run locally.
2521 /// 2. **On Unix the mode is `0700`.** This is the invariant `create_all`
2522 /// documents — that a diagnostics file is not readable by other local
2523 /// accounts — and `tracing_appender` writes 0644 files into whatever
2524 /// directory it is given, so a `0755` `logs/` defeats it entirely.
2525 fn assert_install_created_restricted_directories(paths: &crate::paths::AppPaths) {
2526 for (purpose, path) in paths.all() {
2527 assert!(
2528 path.is_dir(),
2529 "install must create the {purpose} directory too: going through \
2530 AppPaths::create_all is what applies the restriction, and creating only \
2531 logs/ is the bug this asserts against ({})",
2532 path.display()
2533 );
2534
2535 #[cfg(unix)]
2536 {
2537 use std::os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt as _;
2538
2539 let mode = std::fs::metadata(path)
2540 .expect("the directory exists")
2541 .permissions()
2542 .mode()
2543 & 0o777;
2544 assert_eq!(
2545 mode, 0o700,
2546 "the {purpose} directory is mode {mode:04o}; a diagnostics file under a \
2547 group- or world-readable directory is readable by other local accounts"
2548 );
2549 }
2550 }
2551 }
2552
2553 /// The one test that exercises [`install`] rather than assembling a
2554 /// subscriber by hand: the rolling file appender, the non-blocking writer,
2555 /// and the guard that has to be held for any of it to reach disk.
2556 ///
2557 /// It installs a *global* subscriber, which a process can only do once, so
2558 /// it is the only test here that may. Everything else uses
2559 /// `with_default`, which is thread-local and does not conflict — including
2560 /// on threads that run after this one.
2561 #[test]
2562 #[serial_test::serial(global_subscriber)]
2563 fn install_writes_redacted_json_into_the_logs_directory() {
2564 // `install` honours `RUST_LOG`, and a developer who has set it to
2565 // something restrictive would otherwise see this fail for a reason that
2566 // has nothing to do with the code. CI sets no such variable.
2567 if std::env::var_os("RUST_LOG").is_some() {
2568 return;
2569 }
2570
2571 let root = tempfile::tempdir().expect("a temporary directory");
2572 let paths = crate::paths::AppPaths::rooted_at(root.path());
2573
2574 let outcome = install(&paths, LogRole::Operator, "trace");
2575
2576 // Asserted before the early return below, because `install` creates the
2577 // directories before it touches the global subscriber: this holds
2578 // whether or not this test won the race to install one.
2579 assert_install_created_restricted_directories(&paths);
2580
2581 let Ok(guard) = outcome else {
2582 // Another test binary in the same process already installed one.
2583 // Not this test's failure, and not worth making the suite
2584 // order-dependent over.
2585 return;
2586 };
2587
2588 tracing::info!(event = "installed", runner_token = %USER_TOKEN, "hello from the sink");
2589
2590 // Dropping the guard flushes and stops the background writer, which is
2591 // the documented way to be sure the line reached disk.
2592 drop(guard);
2593
2594 let written: Vec<PathBuf> = std::fs::read_dir(paths.logs_dir())
2595 .expect("the log directory was created")
2596 .filter_map(Result::ok)
2597 .map(|entry| entry.path())
2598 .collect();
2599 assert_eq!(
2600 written.len(),
2601 1,
2602 "expected one rotating log file: {written:?}"
2603 );
2604
2605 let contents = std::fs::read_to_string(&written[0]).expect("readable");
2606 assert!(contents.contains("hello from the sink"), "{contents}");
2607 assert!(
2608 !contents.contains(USER_TOKEN),
2609 "the file sink must redact exactly like the in-memory one:\n{contents}"
2610 );
2611 assert!(contents.contains(REDACTION), "{contents}");
2612 serde_json::from_str::<Value>(contents.lines().next().expect("a line"))
2613 .expect("each line is a JSON object");
2614 }
2615
2616 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2617 // Two accounts, one logs/ directory
2618 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2619
2620 /// The daemon and the operator do not reach for the same file.
2621 ///
2622 /// Cheap, and it is the whole of the separation: everything else about
2623 /// [`LogRole`] follows from these two names being different.
2624 #[test]
2625 fn the_daemon_and_the_operator_write_different_files() {
2626 assert_ne!(
2627 LogRole::Service.file_stem(),
2628 LogRole::Operator.file_stem(),
2629 "a boot-mode daemon runs as another account and creates its file 0644; sharing a \
2630 stem hands whichever of them opened it first the day's file and locks the other out"
2631 );
2632 assert_eq!(LogRole::Operator.file_stem(), OPERATOR_LOG_STEM);
2633 assert_eq!(LogRole::Service.file_stem(), SERVICE_LOG_STEM);
2634 }
2635
2636 /// A file this account may not append to is written *beside*, not panicked
2637 /// on.
2638 ///
2639 /// This is the reported 0.1.17 crash, reproduced at the mode that caused
2640 /// it. On the host it was ownership — `root` had rolled the file over at
2641 /// midnight — and an unprivileged test cannot make a `root`-owned file, so
2642 /// it makes an unwritable one instead: the appender's `OpenOptions` refuse
2643 /// both with the same `EACCES`, and refusing was what
2644 /// `tracing_appender::rolling::daily` turned into a panic.
2645 #[cfg(unix)]
2646 #[test]
2647 fn a_log_file_this_account_cannot_append_to_is_written_beside() {
2648 use std::os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt as _;
2649
2650 // `root` is not subject to the mode bits, so it would sail through the
2651 // very open this test needs to fail.
2652 if account_tag() == "uid-0" {
2653 return;
2654 }
2655
2656 let root = tempfile::tempdir().expect("a temporary directory");
2657 let paths = crate::paths::AppPaths::rooted_at(root.path());
2658 paths
2659 .create_all()
2660 .expect("the four directories are created");
2661
2662 // Every date the appender might choose, so the test cannot flake on a
2663 // run that straddles midnight UTC.
2664 let logs = paths.logs_dir().to_path_buf();
2665 let today = chrono::Utc::now();
2666 for date in [
2667 (today - chrono::Duration::days(1))
2668 .format("%Y-%m-%d")
2669 .to_string(),
2670 today.format("%Y-%m-%d").to_string(),
2671 (today + chrono::Duration::days(1))
2672 .format("%Y-%m-%d")
2673 .to_string(),
2674 ] {
2675 let taken = logs.join(format!("{OPERATOR_LOG_STEM}.{date}"));
2676 std::fs::write(&taken, b"another account's diagnostics").expect("writable");
2677 std::fs::set_permissions(&taken, std::fs::Permissions::from_mode(0o444))
2678 .expect("the mode is applied");
2679 }
2680
2681 let mut appender = open_appender(&logs, LogRole::Operator)
2682 .expect("a diagnostics file is opened beside the one this account may not append to");
2683 appender
2684 .write_all(b"a line\n")
2685 .expect("the line is written");
2686 appender.flush().expect("the line is flushed");
2687
2688 let qualified = account_qualified_stem(OPERATOR_LOG_STEM);
2689 let written: Vec<String> = std::fs::read_dir(&logs)
2690 .expect("the directory is readable")
2691 .flatten()
2692 .map(|entry| entry.file_name().to_string_lossy().into_owned())
2693 .collect();
2694 assert!(
2695 written.iter().any(|name| name.starts_with(&qualified)),
2696 "expected a file under {qualified:?} beside the unwritable ones, and found {written:?}"
2697 );
2698 for name in &written {
2699 if name.starts_with(&qualified) {
2700 continue;
2701 }
2702 assert_eq!(
2703 std::fs::read(logs.join(name)).expect("readable"),
2704 b"another account's diagnostics",
2705 "{name} belongs to another account and must not have been touched"
2706 );
2707 }
2708 }
2709
2710 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2711 // The scrubber, in isolation
2712 // -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2713
2714 #[test]
2715 fn tokens_are_redacted_wherever_they_appear() {
2716 for token in [USER_TOKEN, SERVER_TOKEN, FINE_GRAINED] {
2717 for shape in [
2718 token.to_string(),
2719 format!("using {token} now"),
2720 format!("(\"{token}\")"),
2721 format!("token={token}"),
2722 format!("Authorization: Bearer {token}"),
2723 format!("authorization={token}"),
2724 // A URL's userinfo. This is the canonical token-authenticated
2725 // git remote, so it is what a clone or fetch error carries, and
2726 // it is the shape the `://` branch used to hand back verbatim.
2727 format!("https://x-access-token:{token}@github.com/owner/repo.git"),
2728 format!("fatal: could not read from https://{token}@github.com/o/r"),
2729 // Userinfo with no password half.
2730 format!("https://{token}@github.com/o/r.git"),
2731 // A fragment, which used to be stripped only when it was a
2732 // query string.
2733 format!("https://github.com/login/oauth#access_token={token}"),
2734 format!("https://github.com/x?a=1#token={token}"),
2735 ] {
2736 let redacted = redact(&shape);
2737 assert!(
2738 !redacted.contains(token),
2739 "{shape:?} survived redaction as {redacted:?}"
2740 );
2741 }
2742 }
2743 }
2744
2745 #[test]
2746 fn a_url_keeps_what_diagnoses_it_and_loses_what_authenticates_it() {
2747 // The host and the path are the diagnosable part and must survive, or
2748 // nobody keeps this redaction.
2749 assert_eq!(
2750 redact(
2751 "https://x-access-token:ghu_16C7e42F292c6912E7710c838347Ae178B4a@github.com/owner/repo.git"
2752 ),
2753 format!("https://{REDACTION}@github.com/owner/repo.git")
2754 );
2755 assert_eq!(
2756 redact("https://user:hunter2@api.github.com/repos/o/r?page=2"),
2757 format!("https://{REDACTION}@api.github.com/repos/o/r?{REDACTION}")
2758 );
2759 // A password containing an `@`: the host is what follows the last one.
2760 assert_eq!(
2761 redact("https://user:p@ss@github.com/o/r"),
2762 format!("https://{REDACTION}@github.com/o/r")
2763 );
2764 // Userinfo on a bare authority, with no path at all.
2765 assert_eq!(
2766 redact("https://token@github.com"),
2767 format!("https://{REDACTION}@github.com")
2768 );
2769 // An `@` after the first `/` is part of the path, not userinfo.
2770 assert_eq!(
2771 redact("https://github.com/@owner/repo"),
2772 "https://github.com/@owner/repo"
2773 );
2774 }
2775
2776 #[test]
2777 fn an_encoded_jit_configuration_is_redacted() {
2778 assert_eq!(redact(JIT_BLOB), REDACTION);
2779 let sentence = format!("handing off {JIT_BLOB} to the runner");
2780 let redacted = redact(&sentence);
2781 assert!(!redacted.contains(JIT_BLOB), "{redacted}");
2782 assert!(redacted.starts_with("handing off "), "{redacted}");
2783 assert!(redacted.ends_with(" to the runner"), "{redacted}");
2784 }
2785
2786 #[test]
2787 fn a_secret_embedded_in_a_structured_value_is_redacted() {
2788 // Compact JSON is what `serde_json::to_string` emits and what an
2789 // HTTP error body arrives as; spaced JSON is the only shape that
2790 // used to be safe, and it was safe by accident -- the value is its
2791 // own word there, so the opaque-run rule caught it without the key
2792 // ever being recognised.
2793 for shape in [
2794 format!("{{\"encoded_jit_config\":\"{JIT_BLOB}\"}}"),
2795 format!("{{ \"encoded_jit_config\": \"{JIT_BLOB}\" }}"),
2796 format!("encoded_jit_config:{JIT_BLOB}"),
2797 format!("{{\"runner_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}"),
2798 format!("runner_token:{USER_TOKEN}"),
2799 format!("pat:{USER_TOKEN}"),
2800 format!("{{\"authorization\":\"Bearer {USER_TOKEN}\"}}"),
2801 ] {
2802 let redacted = redact(&shape);
2803 assert!(
2804 !redacted.contains(JIT_BLOB) && !redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN),
2805 "leaked from {shape}:\n{redacted}"
2806 );
2807 }
2808
2809 // A credential short enough to clear the opaque-run threshold and
2810 // without a GitHub prefix has nothing but the key to give it away,
2811 // so it leaked from the spaced shape too: `\"password\":` left the
2812 // key spelled `password\"`, which is on no list.
2813 for shape in [
2814 "{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}",
2815 "{ \"password\": \"hunter2\" }",
2816 ] {
2817 let redacted = redact(shape);
2818 assert!(
2819 !redacted.contains("hunter2"),
2820 "leaked from {shape}: {redacted}"
2821 );
2822 }
2823
2824 // The neighbouring context still survives: this is a scrubber, not
2825 // a deleter.
2826 let body = format!("registration failed: {{\"encoded_jit_config\":\"{JIT_BLOB}\"}}");
2827 let redacted = redact(&body);
2828 assert!(redacted.starts_with("registration failed: "), "{redacted}");
2829 assert!(redacted.contains("encoded_jit_config"), "{redacted}");
2830 }
2831
2832 #[test]
2833 fn a_credential_key_is_found_wherever_it_sits_in_a_compact_structure() {
2834 // Every shape the test above covers puts the credential in the
2835 // *first* key/value pair, and the rules split a word once, on the
2836 // first separator they find. So redaction was a function of field
2837 // order -- and `serde_json::to_string` is what decides field order for
2838 // any struct with more than one field, which is what an error body is.
2839 //
2840 // Nesting and a form-encoded body are the same defect wearing
2841 // different punctuation: the value recursion ends at `redact_value`,
2842 // which is a leaf, and `&` was not a separator at all.
2843 for shape in [
2844 // The credential key second, in a compact object.
2845 format!("{{\"runner_id\":42,\"encoded_jit_config\":\"{JIT_BLOB}\"}}"),
2846 format!("{{\"status\":422,\"message\":\"bad\",\"runner_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}"),
2847 // Nested one level, and two.
2848 format!("{{\"body\":{{\"runner_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}}}"),
2849 format!(
2850 "{{\"error\":{{\"status\":422,\"body\":{{\"encoded_jit_config\":\"{JIT_BLOB}\"}}}}}}"
2851 ),
2852 // An array of objects, which is what a list endpoint returns.
2853 format!("[{{\"id\":1}},{{\"access_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}]"),
2854 // Form-encoded, credential second and in the middle.
2855 format!("scope=repo&access_token={USER_TOKEN}"),
2856 format!("grant_type=refresh&refresh_token={USER_TOKEN}&scope=repo"),
2857 ] {
2858 let redacted = redact(&shape);
2859 assert!(
2860 !redacted.contains(JIT_BLOB) && !redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN),
2861 "leaked from {shape}:\n{redacted}"
2862 );
2863 assert!(redacted.contains(REDACTION), "{shape} -> {redacted}");
2864 }
2865
2866 // The pairs around it stay legible. A body whose every field came back
2867 // `[redacted]` diagnoses nothing, and is how a redaction gets turned
2868 // off rather than fixed.
2869 let redacted = redact(&format!(
2870 "failed: {{\"runner_id\":42,\"encoded_jit_config\":\"{JIT_BLOB}\"}}"
2871 ));
2872 assert!(redacted.starts_with("failed: "), "{redacted}");
2873 assert!(redacted.contains("\"runner_id\":42"), "{redacted}");
2874 assert!(redacted.contains("encoded_jit_config"), "{redacted}");
2875
2876 // A credential short enough to clear the opaque-run threshold and
2877 // carrying no GitHub prefix has nothing but its key to give it away,
2878 // so it is the case the shape rules cannot rescue.
2879 for shape in [
2880 "{\"user\":\"operator\",\"password\":\"hunter2\"}",
2881 "{\"body\":{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}}",
2882 "user=operator&password=hunter2",
2883 ] {
2884 assert!(
2885 !redact(shape).contains("hunter2"),
2886 "leaked from {shape}: {}",
2887 redact(shape)
2888 );
2889 }
2890
2891 // Ordinary punctuation still survives the cut, or the structure that
2892 // makes a log line readable is gone with the secret.
2893 assert_eq!(
2894 redact("desired 3, active 1, headroom 2"),
2895 "desired 3, active 1, headroom 2"
2896 );
2897 assert_eq!(
2898 redact("labels=[linux,x64,self-hosted]"),
2899 "labels=[linux,x64,self-hosted]"
2900 );
2901 }
2902
2903 #[test]
2904 fn backslash_escaped_json_reaches_the_key_rules_and_the_value_rules() {
2905 // `tracing::error!(reason = ?err)` reaches this module through
2906 // `record_debug` and `format!("{:?}")`, and `Debug` on a `String`
2907 // escapes the quotes inside it. So an error whose `Debug` embeds an
2908 // HTTP body arrives with its keys spelled `\"password\"` -- and `\`
2909 // is not in `WRAPPERS`, so `trim_matches(WRAPPERS)` left it welded on
2910 // and no list contained the result. `reason` is on ALLOWED_FIELDS, so
2911 // this reaches the scrubber rather than being dropped.
2912 let failure = StoreError {
2913 body: "{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}".to_string(),
2914 };
2915 // The fixture carries the secret before anything has looked at it. A
2916 // premise, asserted rather than assumed: a fixture that quietly
2917 // stopped carrying one would make every assertion below vacuously
2918 // true.
2919 assert!(failure.body.contains("hunter2"), "{}", failure.body);
2920 let rendered = format!("{failure:?}");
2921 // The premise, asserted rather than assumed: `Debug` really does
2922 // produce the escaped spelling. If it ever stops, this test is
2923 // measuring something else.
2924 assert!(
2925 rendered.contains("\\\"password\\\""),
2926 "the premise is that Debug escapes the quotes: {rendered}"
2927 );
2928 assert!(
2929 !redact(&rendered).contains("hunter2"),
2930 "leaked: {}",
2931 redact(&rendered)
2932 );
2933
2934 for shape in [
2935 "{\\\"password\\\":\\\"hunter2\\\"}",
2936 "Error { body: \"{\\\"access_token\\\":\\\"hunter2\\\"}\" }",
2937 ] {
2938 assert!(
2939 !redact(shape).contains("hunter2"),
2940 "leaked from {shape}: {}",
2941 redact(shape)
2942 );
2943 }
2944
2945 // The escaped spelling of a long secret leaked too, and for the same
2946 // reason: the key was unrecognised, so nothing below it ever ran.
2947 let escaped = format!("{{\\\"encoded_jit_config\\\":\\\"{JIT_BLOB}\\\"}}");
2948 assert!(!redact(&escaped).contains(JIT_BLOB), "{}", redact(&escaped));
2949
2950 // Trimming the key is only half of it, and it is the half that is
2951 // easy to mistake for the whole. `runner_token` is deliberately *not*
2952 // on CREDENTIAL_KEYS -- a field name is not what makes a value a
2953 // secret, and this module's own documentation says so -- so that pair
2954 // is caught by the token-prefix rule reading its *value*, or it is not
2955 // caught at all. The escaped quote hid the value from that rule
2956 // exactly as it hid the key from the key rules, and a key-only fix
2957 // leaves this one leaking through the sink.
2958 assert!(
2959 !is_credential_key("runner_token"),
2960 "the premise of this case is an unlisted key; once it is listed, \
2961 this stops exercising the value side at all"
2962 );
2963 let escaped_value = format!("{{\\\"runner_token\\\":\\\"{USER_TOKEN}\\\"}}");
2964 assert!(
2965 !redact(&escaped_value).contains(USER_TOKEN),
2966 "the value side leaked: {}",
2967 redact(&escaped_value)
2968 );
2969
2970 // The trim is unconditional on a key and conditional on a value: a
2971 // backslash comes off a value only where it is escaping punctuation.
2972 // `split_wrappers` runs before `looks_like_path`, so putting `\` in
2973 // `WRAPPERS` would trim away the leading `\\` that UNC detection keys
2974 // on and turn a share path back into ordinary text.
2975 assert_eq!(redact(r"\\fileserver\share\jit"), PATH_REDACTION);
2976 assert_eq!(redact(r"\\?\C:\Users\operator\runtime"), PATH_REDACTION);
2977 // And the escaped spelling of a share path is still a share path:
2978 // `\\` escapes nothing, so it survives the trim that `\"` does not.
2979 assert_eq!(redact(r"\\\\fileserver\\share\\jit"), PATH_REDACTION);
2980 // A path ending in its own separator is still a path without it. The
2981 // separator is punctuation, so it is trimmed, judged, and put back.
2982 let trailing = redact("C:\\Users\\operator\\runtime\\");
2983 assert!(trailing.starts_with(PATH_REDACTION), "{trailing}");
2984 assert!(!trailing.contains("operator"), "{trailing}");
2985 }
2986
2987 #[test]
2988 fn a_url_does_not_make_the_rest_of_its_word_unredactable() {
2989 // `redact_core` split on the first `://` and handed *everything*
2990 // before it to `redact_url` as a scheme and everything after it as a
2991 // URL. The terminal arm of `redact_url` echoes both verbatim, so a
2992 // single URL anywhere in a word turned the whole of the rest of that
2993 // word into text no rule below could reach. The only thing that saved
2994 // the shape was a `?` or `#` inside the URL, which made `redact_url`
2995 // replace the tail.
2996 //
2997 // `documentation_url` is in essentially every GitHub REST error body,
2998 // so this was any such body logged alongside a credential.
2999 let body = format!(
3000 "{{\"message\":\"Bad credentials\",\"documentation_url\":\"https://docs.github.com/rest\",\"token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}"
3001 );
3002 let redacted = redact(&body);
3003 assert!(!redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN), "leaked: {redacted}");
3004 // The URL is the diagnosable part and must survive, or nobody keeps
3005 // this redaction.
3006 assert!(
3007 redacted.contains("https://docs.github.com/rest"),
3008 "the URL should survive: {redacted}"
3009 );
3010
3011 // The mirror order: everything before the `://` became the "scheme".
3012 let reversed = format!(
3013 "{{\"token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\",\"documentation_url\":\"https://docs.github.com/rest\"}}"
3014 );
3015 let redacted = redact(&reversed);
3016 assert!(!redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN), "leaked: {redacted}");
3017
3018 // A nested object behind a URL was missed even when the URL's own
3019 // userinfo was caught, because the miss and the catch happened in the
3020 // same call.
3021 let clone = format!(
3022 "{{\"remote\":\"https://x-access-token:{USER_TOKEN}@github.com/o/r.git\",\"body\":{{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}}}}"
3023 );
3024 let redacted = redact(&clone);
3025 assert!(!redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN), "leaked: {redacted}");
3026 assert!(!redacted.contains("hunter2"), "leaked: {redacted}");
3027 assert!(
3028 redacted.contains("@github.com/o/r.git"),
3029 "the remote should stay diagnosable: {redacted}"
3030 );
3031
3032 // A URL still owns its own query string, which is why the URL check
3033 // sits ahead of the structural cut: `?` and `#` are not structural
3034 // characters, and an OAuth response puts the token after one of them.
3035 assert_eq!(
3036 redact(&format!(
3037 "{{\"url\":\"https://api.github.com/x?token={USER_TOKEN}\"}}"
3038 )),
3039 format!("{{\"url\":\"https://api.github.com/x?{REDACTION}\"}}")
3040 );
3041 // And a URL standing on its own is untouched.
3042 assert_eq!(
3043 redact("GET https://api.github.com/repos/o/r/actions/runners"),
3044 "GET https://api.github.com/repos/o/r/actions/runners"
3045 );
3046
3047 // A URL that is a credential key's *own* value keeps its scheme, host
3048 // and path like every other URL -- a URL is not a token, and this
3049 // module keeps exactly that much of one everywhere else. What must not
3050 // happen is the key's empty value being redacted on the way past,
3051 // which put the URL out behind a `[redacted]` that had replaced
3052 // nothing: `token=[redacted]https://evil.example/x`. Bounding the URL
3053 // is what created that shape, and pass one declining an empty value is
3054 // what closes it.
3055 assert_eq!(
3056 redact("token=https://evil.example/x"),
3057 "token=https://evil.example/x"
3058 );
3059 assert_eq!(
3060 redact("{\"token\":\"https://evil.example/x\"}"),
3061 "{\"token\":\"https://evil.example/x\"}"
3062 );
3063 // An empty credential value is nothing to redact wherever it sits, and
3064 // saying otherwise reports a secret in a place none was.
3065 assert_eq!(redact("{\"password\":\"\"}"), "{\"password\":\"\"}");
3066 }
3067
3068 #[test]
3069 fn an_array_element_is_judged_without_the_quote_that_wraps_it() {
3070 // The structural cut recursed on the *raw* fragment, and the terminal
3071 // fallback then called `redact_value` with the wrappers still on. A
3072 // fragment carrying no `:` or `=` of its own -- which is exactly what
3073 // an array element is -- therefore reached the shape rules as
3074 // `"ghu_…`: `starts_with("ghu_")` fails, `is_opaque_char` fails on the
3075 // quote, `starts_with("eyJ")` fails, and `looks_like_path` never gets
3076 // a clean look at `"C:\Users\…`.
3077 //
3078 // This is the defect the structural cut was written to close, one step
3079 // further down: "only the first key/value pair is ever examined"
3080 // became "a value with no key of its own is never examined". It
3081 // survived a round because `scan_for_leaks` had no array among its
3082 // twelve shapes.
3083 for shape in [
3084 format!("{{\"tokens\":[\"{USER_TOKEN}\",\"x\"]}}"),
3085 format!("{{\"tokens\":[\"x\",\"{USER_TOKEN}\"]}}"),
3086 format!("[\"x\",\"{USER_TOKEN}\"]"),
3087 format!("[{{\"id\":1}},[\"{USER_TOKEN}\"]]"),
3088 // The `Debug`-escaped spelling of the same thing.
3089 format!("{{\\\"tokens\\\":[\\\"x\\\",\\\"{USER_TOKEN}\\\"]}}"),
3090 ] {
3091 let redacted = redact(&shape);
3092 assert!(
3093 !redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN),
3094 "leaked from {shape}: {redacted}"
3095 );
3096 assert!(redacted.contains(REDACTION), "{shape} -> {redacted}");
3097 }
3098
3099 // Every other shape rule was reachable the same way.
3100 let jit = format!("{{\"items\":[\"{JIT_BLOB}\"]}}");
3101 assert!(!redact(&jit).contains(JIT_BLOB), "{}", redact(&jit));
3102 let assertions = format!("{{\"assertions\":[\"{JWT}\"]}}");
3103 assert!(
3104 !redact(&assertions).contains(JWT),
3105 "{}",
3106 redact(&assertions)
3107 );
3108 let opaque = "ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA9876543210zyxwvut";
3109 assert!(opaque.len() > OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD, "{}", opaque.len());
3110 let listed = format!("[\"x\",\"{opaque}\"]");
3111 assert!(!redact(&listed).contains(opaque), "{}", redact(&listed));
3112
3113 // A path in an array. `07-security.md` requires paths redacted, and
3114 // only `looks_like_path` can see one -- with a clean look at the value
3115 // and not before.
3116 let roots = format!("{{\"roots\":[\"x\",\"{WINDOWS_WORKSPACE}\"]}}");
3117 let redacted = redact(&roots);
3118 assert!(!redacted.contains(WINDOWS_WORKSPACE), "leaked: {redacted}");
3119 assert!(redacted.contains(PATH_REDACTION), "{redacted}");
3120
3121 // The array survives being scrubbed: this is a scrubber, not a
3122 // deleter.
3123 assert_eq!(
3124 redact("labels=[\"linux\",\"x64\"]"),
3125 "labels=[\"linux\",\"x64\"]"
3126 );
3127 }
3128
3129 #[test]
3130 fn a_semicolon_cuts_a_word_the_way_a_comma_does() {
3131 // `;` was in `WRAPPERS` -- recognised as punctuation -- and not in
3132 // `STRUCTURAL`, so it never cut a word. It is the separator for a
3133 // Windows connection string, for a credential string, and for cookie
3134 // pairs written without a space, which is `d2`'s territory exactly.
3135 // `Set-Cookie: theme=dark; session=…` was safe only because of the
3136 // space after the `;`.
3137 for shape in [
3138 "store rejected: Server=host;Database=x;Password=hunter2;",
3139 "store rejected: user=operator;password=hunter2",
3140 "Server=host;Password=hunter2;Database=x",
3141 ] {
3142 let redacted = redact(shape);
3143 assert!(
3144 !redacted.contains("hunter2"),
3145 "leaked from {shape}: {redacted}"
3146 );
3147 }
3148
3149 let cookies = format!("theme=dark;session={USER_TOKEN}");
3150 let redacted = redact(&cookies);
3151 assert!(!redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN), "leaked: {redacted}");
3152
3153 // Separators go back verbatim, so ordinary prose is unaffected.
3154 assert_eq!(
3155 redact("started; then reconciled; then idled"),
3156 "started; then reconciled; then idled"
3157 );
3158 assert_eq!(
3159 redact("desired 3;active 1;headroom 2"),
3160 "desired 3;active 1;headroom 2"
3161 );
3162 }
3163
3164 #[test]
3165 fn an_element_wrapped_value_is_redacted() {
3166 // `split_wrappers` strips only the *outermost* `<` and `>`, so
3167 // `<string>ghu_…</string>` arrived as `string>ghu_…</string`, which
3168 // matches no rule at all. `d3`'s installers handle launchd plists,
3169 // which is where this shape comes from; a systemd unit line is the
3170 // `key=value` spelling and was already covered.
3171 for shape in [
3172 format!("<string>{USER_TOKEN}</string>"),
3173 format!("<key>token</key><string>{USER_TOKEN}</string>"),
3174 format!("<dict><key>Token</key><string>{USER_TOKEN}</string></dict>"),
3175 ] {
3176 let redacted = redact(&shape);
3177 assert!(
3178 !redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN),
3179 "leaked from {shape}: {redacted}"
3180 );
3181 assert!(redacted.contains(REDACTION), "{shape} -> {redacted}");
3182 }
3183
3184 // The element names survive: they are what says the line was about a
3185 // plist at all.
3186 let plist = format!("<key>token</key><string>{JIT_BLOB}</string>");
3187 let redacted = redact(&plist);
3188 assert!(!redacted.contains(JIT_BLOB), "leaked: {redacted}");
3189 assert!(redacted.contains("<key>token</key>"), "{redacted}");
3190
3191 // An angle bracket in ordinary text is re-emitted verbatim.
3192 assert_eq!(redact("Custom<Io>"), "Custom<Io>");
3193 }
3194
3195 #[test]
3196 fn a_redacted_value_keeps_the_punctuation_that_wrapped_it() {
3197 // Pass one returned `format!("{key}{separator}{REDACTION}")` and
3198 // dropped the value's trailing wrapper, so a redacted object came out
3199 // with an unbalanced quote: `{"password":[redacted]"}`. Pass two
3200 // already put `lead` and `trail` back.
3201 //
3202 // Worth fixing because this module argues, correctly, that the
3203 // structure around a redaction is what keeps a line diagnosable -- and
3204 // a reader who cannot parse the line cannot tell a redaction from a
3205 // truncation.
3206 assert_eq!(
3207 redact("{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}"),
3208 format!("{{\"password\":\"{REDACTION}\"}}")
3209 );
3210 assert_eq!(
3211 redact(&format!("{{\"access_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}")),
3212 format!("{{\"access_token\":\"{REDACTION}\"}}")
3213 );
3214 assert_eq!(
3215 redact(&format!(
3216 "[{{\"id\":1}},{{\"access_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}]"
3217 )),
3218 format!("[{{\"id\":1}},{{\"access_token\":\"{REDACTION}\"}}]")
3219 );
3220 // The `Debug`-escaped spelling keeps its escaped quotes.
3221 assert_eq!(
3222 redact("{\\\"password\\\":\\\"hunter2\\\"}"),
3223 format!("{{\\\"password\\\":\\\"{REDACTION}\\\"}}")
3224 );
3225
3226 // The point of all of it: what the sink writes is still the JSON it
3227 // was handed, minus the secret.
3228 let line = redact(&format!(
3229 "{{\"runner_id\":42,\"access_token\":\"{USER_TOKEN}\"}}"
3230 ));
3231 serde_json::from_str::<Value>(&line)
3232 .unwrap_or_else(|error| panic!("a redacted body must still parse: {line} ({error})"));
3233 }
3234
3235 #[test]
3236 fn a_bare_jwt_is_redacted_despite_its_dots() {
3237 // `is_opaque_char` excludes `.`, so a JWT is three opaque runs rather
3238 // than one, each under the threshold, and a 100-character credential
3239 // printed verbatim. `Authorization: Bearer <jwt>` is caught by the
3240 // scheme rule and a credential-keyed one by the key rule, so this bit
3241 // only where a token stood alone or under a name nobody listed.
3242 assert!(
3243 JWT.len() > 100,
3244 "the premise is a long token: {}",
3245 JWT.len()
3246 );
3247 assert_eq!(redact(JWT), REDACTION);
3248 assert_eq!(
3249 redact(&format!("minted {JWT} for the installation")),
3250 format!("minted {REDACTION} for the installation")
3251 );
3252 // Sentence-final punctuation is trimmed as a wrapper first, so the
3253 // token is still recognised.
3254 assert!(!redact(&format!("minted {JWT}.")).contains(JWT));
3255 // Under a key nobody listed.
3256 assert!(!redact(&format!("assertion={JWT}")).contains(JWT));
3257 assert!(!redact(&format!("{{\"assertion\":\"{JWT}\"}}")).contains(JWT));
3258
3259 // Narrow on purpose. Adding `.` to `is_opaque_char` is the obvious fix
3260 // and the wrong one: it swallows every long dotted word there is.
3261 for ordinary in [
3262 "com.example.runner.manager.platform.process.identity.token",
3263 "runner-manager.2026.08.21.log",
3264 "api.github.com",
3265 "9f2c1a44-0000-4000-8000-000000000001.attempt.json",
3266 ] {
3267 assert_eq!(redact(ordinary), ordinary, "over-redacted {ordinary}");
3268 }
3269 }
3270
3271 #[test]
3272 fn the_sink_redacts_a_short_credential_that_only_its_key_gives_away() {
3273 // `scan_for_leaks` cannot carry this case. A credential short enough
3274 // to clear the opaque-run threshold and carrying no GitHub prefix is
3275 // indistinguishable from an ordinary word when it is logged bare, so
3276 // injecting it through shape 1 would demand a redaction no shape rule
3277 // can deliver. Here the key is always present, which is the situation
3278 // `d2`'s secret store is actually in -- and it is through the sink,
3279 // not through `redact` alone, because that distinction is why these
3280 // shapes survived a round.
3281 let capture = Capture::default();
3282 let output = emit(&capture, || {
3283 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"user\":\"operator\",\"password\":\"hunter2\"}}");
3284 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"body\":{{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}}}}");
3285 tracing::error!("store rejected: user=operator&password=hunter2");
3286 let failure = StoreError {
3287 body: "{\"password\":\"hunter2\"}".to_string(),
3288 };
3289 tracing::error!(reason = ?failure, "store rejected the request");
3290
3291 // A `;` or an `&` after a URL in the same word. The URL branch runs
3292 // ahead of the structural cut and `split_url` did not stop at
3293 // either character, so the separator that would have cut the word
3294 // was swallowed into the URL and echoed.
3295 tracing::error!("store rejected: Server=https://vault.local/api;Password=hunter2;");
3296 tracing::error!("keychain error: url=https://kc.local;password=hunter2");
3297 tracing::error!("unit rejected: Environment=API=https://a.com/v1;PASSWORD=hunter2");
3298 tracing::error!("token exchange failed: cb=https://a.com/x&password=hunter2");
3299
3300 // A credential key whose value is in a *later* fragment. The
3301 // empty-value skip is right; the claim that the structural cut
3302 // reaches such a value was not, because nothing carried the key
3303 // across the cut.
3304 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":[\"hunter2\"]}}");
3305 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":{{\"v\":\"hunter2\"}}}}");
3306 tracing::error!("store rejected: Password=;hunter2");
3307 tracing::error!("plist rejected: <key>password</key><string>hunter2</string>");
3308 tracing::error!(
3309 "plist rejected: <dict><key>password</key><string>hunter2</string></dict>"
3310 );
3311
3312 // A structural character inside the value. `,` and `&` could
3313 // already split a secret; this commit added `;`, `<` and `>`.
3314 //
3315 // The pieces are spelled so that none of them is a substring of
3316 // anything the line legitimately keeps -- `ss` would have "found" a
3317 // leak in the surviving key `password`, which is a check that fails
3318 // for the wrong reason and is no better than one that cannot fail.
3319 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":\"qq<vv>xx\"}}");
3320 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":\"j1&k2,m3\"}}");
3321 tracing::error!("store rejected: {{\"password\":\"n4;p5<q6>r7,t8\"}}");
3322 });
3323
3324 assert!(
3325 !output.contains("hunter2"),
3326 "a short credential leaked through the sink:\n{output}"
3327 );
3328 // The punctuated passwords: every piece a structural character can cut
3329 // one into has to go, not just the piece that kept the key company.
3330 for piece in [
3331 "qq", "vv", "xx", "j1", "k2", "m3", "n4", "p5", "q6", "r7", "t8",
3332 ] {
3333 assert!(
3334 !output.contains(piece),
3335 "a structural character split a secret and the tail survived \
3336 ({piece}):\n{output}"
3337 );
3338 }
3339 assert!(output.contains(REDACTION), "{output}");
3340 // Sixteen lines, or the sink was never reached and "no secret found" is
3341 // true of an empty string.
3342 assert_eq!(
3343 output
3344 .lines()
3345 .filter(|line| !line.trim().is_empty())
3346 .count(),
3347 16,
3348 "{output}"
3349 );
3350 }
3351
3352 /// The multi-word plist spelling, which is worse than the one-word one:
3353 /// the credential key and the value are in the same word, but the value
3354 /// itself is two words, so closing it needs the fragment carry to reach the
3355 /// word-level follow-on rule.
3356 #[test]
3357 fn a_credential_value_that_runs_past_its_own_word_is_still_redacted() {
3358 let capture = Capture::default();
3359 let output = emit(&capture, || {
3360 tracing::error!("plist rejected: <key>password</key><string>correct horse</string>");
3361 tracing::error!("plist rejected: <key>password</key> <string>correct horse</string>");
3362 });
3363 for piece in ["correct", "horse"] {
3364 assert!(
3365 !output.contains(piece),
3366 "a multi-word credential value leaked ({piece}):\n{output}"
3367 );
3368 }
3369 }
3370
3371 /// The other half of the fragment carry: it must not swallow the ordinary,
3372 /// *closed* pairs sitting next to a credential.
3373 ///
3374 /// Every shape here is one the carry has an opportunity to over-redact —
3375 /// a closed empty value, a neighbouring key, the pairs of a connection
3376 /// string, and the element names of a plist. Redaction that eats the
3377 /// diagnostics is redaction nobody keeps, and a carry with no terminator
3378 /// is exactly how that happens.
3379 #[test]
3380 fn the_fragment_carry_stops_where_the_value_does() {
3381 for (input, expected) in [
3382 (
3383 "{\"password\":\"abc\",\"user\":\"bob\"}",
3384 format!("{{\"password\":\"{REDACTION}\",\"user\":\"bob\"}}"),
3385 ),
3386 (
3387 "Server=host;Password=hunter2;User=bob",
3388 format!("Server=host;Password={REDACTION};User=bob"),
3389 ),
3390 (
3391 "{\"password\":\"\",\"user\":\"bob\"}",
3392 "{\"password\":\"\",\"user\":\"bob\"}".to_string(),
3393 ),
3394 (
3395 "<dict><key>password</key><string>hunter2</string></dict>",
3396 format!("<dict><key>password</key><string>{REDACTION}</string></dict>"),
3397 ),
3398 (
3399 "{\"password\":\"qq<vv>xx\"}",
3400 format!("{{\"password\":\"{REDACTION}<{REDACTION}>{REDACTION}\"}}"),
3401 ),
3402 ] {
3403 assert_eq!(redact(input), expected, "from {input}");
3404 }
3405
3406 // A closed value ends the claim, so the word after it is ordinary text.
3407 assert_eq!(
3408 redact("{\"password\":\"x\"} ok"),
3409 format!("{{\"password\":\"{REDACTION}\"}} ok")
3410 );
3411 assert_eq!(
3412 redact("Server=host;Password=hunter2; ok"),
3413 format!("Server=host;Password={REDACTION}; ok")
3414 );
3415
3416 // `{"password":""} ok` is *not* on that list, and the reason is worth
3417 // recording rather than asserting away. `split_wrappers` strips the
3418 // empty value with the rest of the trailing punctuation, so the word
3419 // reaches `redact_word` as the core `password":` — a bare credential
3420 // key, which the stem rule has always read as "the value is the next
3421 // word". That rule predates the carry, is untouched by it, and fires
3422 // first; the empty-value skip below it never gets a look. So the `ok`
3423 // is redacted, exactly as it was before any of this.
3424 assert_eq!(
3425 redact("{\"password\":\"\"} ok"),
3426 format!("{{\"password\":\"\"}} {REDACTION}")
3427 );
3428 // What the empty-value skip does still guarantee is the thing it was
3429 // written for: no `[redacted]` is invented *inside* the pair itself.
3430 assert_eq!(redact("{\"password\":\"\"}"), "{\"password\":\"\"}");
3431
3432 // Ordinary prose is untouched: the carry is only ever armed by a
3433 // credential key.
3434 assert_eq!(
3435 redact("started; then reconciled; then idled"),
3436 "started; then reconciled; then idled"
3437 );
3438 assert_eq!(redact("Custom<Io>"), "Custom<Io>");
3439 }
3440
3441 #[test]
3442 fn paths_are_redacted_on_both_families() {
3443 assert_eq!(redact(WORKSPACE), PATH_REDACTION);
3444 assert_eq!(redact(WINDOWS_WORKSPACE), PATH_REDACTION);
3445 assert_eq!(redact("\\\\fileserver\\share\\jit"), PATH_REDACTION);
3446 assert_eq!(
3447 redact("~/Library/Application Support/x"),
3448 format!("{PATH_REDACTION} Support/x")
3449 );
3450 assert_eq!(
3451 redact("runtime=/var/lib/runner-manager/runtime"),
3452 format!("runtime={PATH_REDACTION}")
3453 );
3454 }
3455
3456 #[test]
3457 fn a_url_survives_but_its_query_string_and_fragment_do_not() {
3458 assert_eq!(
3459 redact("GET https://api.github.com/repos/owner/repo/actions/runners"),
3460 "GET https://api.github.com/repos/owner/repo/actions/runners"
3461 );
3462 assert_eq!(
3463 redact("https://api.github.com/x?access_token=ghu_secret"),
3464 format!("https://api.github.com/x?{REDACTION}")
3465 );
3466 // A fragment carries a token in an OAuth implicit-flow response, and
3467 // is never needed to diagnose an HTTP call.
3468 assert_eq!(
3469 redact("https://api.github.com/x#access_token=ghu_secret"),
3470 format!("https://api.github.com/x#{REDACTION}")
3471 );
3472 // Whichever comes first ends the diagnosable part.
3473 assert_eq!(
3474 redact("https://api.github.com/x?page=2#access_token=ghu_secret"),
3475 format!("https://api.github.com/x?{REDACTION}")
3476 );
3477 }
3478
3479 /// `;` and `&` end a URL, but only ahead of its query string.
3480 ///
3481 /// `STRUCTURAL` has nine characters and `is_url_terminator` recognised
3482 /// seven of them. Because the URL branch runs *ahead* of the structural
3483 /// cut, a URL earlier in a word made `split_url` swallow everything to the
3484 /// next terminator — including the `;` or `&` that would have cut the word
3485 /// — and `redact_url`'s terminal arm echoes what it is given. So the L3 fix
3486 /// (bounding a URL) and the L1 fix (cutting on `;` and `&`) did not
3487 /// compose, and this commit added `;` to `STRUCTURAL` for connection
3488 /// strings while leaving the path a URL opens straight through it.
3489 #[test]
3490 fn a_separator_after_a_url_still_cuts_the_word() {
3491 for shape in [
3492 format!("store rejected: Server=https://vault.local/api;Password={USER_TOKEN};"),
3493 format!("keychain error: url=https://kc.local;secret={USER_TOKEN}"),
3494 format!("unit rejected: Environment=API=https://a.com/v1;TOKEN={USER_TOKEN}"),
3495 format!("token exchange failed: cb=https://a.com/x&access_token={USER_TOKEN}"),
3496 format!("dsn rejected: dsn=https://sentry.local/1;password={USER_TOKEN};user=x"),
3497 ] {
3498 let redacted = redact(&shape);
3499 assert!(
3500 !redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN),
3501 "leaked from {shape}:\n{redacted}"
3502 );
3503 }
3504
3505 // The URL itself still survives, or nobody keeps this redaction.
3506 assert_eq!(
3507 redact("store rejected: Server=https://vault.local/api;Password=hunter2;"),
3508 format!("store rejected: Server=https://vault.local/api;Password={REDACTION};")
3509 );
3510
3511 // The obvious fix is the wrong one, and this is what it costs. Making
3512 // `;` and `&` terminators everywhere ends a URL *inside* its own query
3513 // string, and `redact_url` replaces a query wholesale precisely because
3514 // a token can be in any parameter and this module does not guess which:
3515 // `?[redacted]` would become `?[redacted]&state=hunter2`. So the cut is
3516 // restricted to the part of the URL ahead of the first `?` or `#`.
3517 assert_eq!(
3518 redact("https://a.com/cb?code=1&state=hunter2"),
3519 format!("https://a.com/cb?{REDACTION}")
3520 );
3521 assert_eq!(
3522 redact("https://a.com/cb#code=1&state=hunter2"),
3523 format!("https://a.com/cb#{REDACTION}")
3524 );
3525 assert_eq!(
3526 redact(&format!(
3527 "https://a.com/cb?a=1;b=2&access_token={USER_TOKEN}"
3528 )),
3529 format!("https://a.com/cb?{REDACTION}")
3530 );
3531
3532 // And leaving `\` out of the terminators is still right: a Windows
3533 // path used as a URL password puts the `@` that identifies the
3534 // userinfo behind the first backslash, and `redact_url` echoes what it
3535 // is given.
3536 assert_eq!(
3537 redact(r"https://x-access-token:C:\Users\op\p@github.com/o/r.git"),
3538 format!("https://{REDACTION}@github.com/o/r.git")
3539 );
3540 }
3541
3542 /// A secret in a URL *path* is echoed verbatim.
3543 ///
3544 /// `redact_url` applied no shape rule to the path at all. The design
3545 /// intends a path to be diagnosable — and it still is — but the
3546 /// token-prefix rule is documented as a belt that catches a credential
3547 /// *anywhere*, and a path was the one place it never ran.
3548 #[test]
3549 fn a_secret_in_a_url_path_is_redacted_and_the_rest_of_the_path_is_not() {
3550 for shape in [
3551 format!("https://github.com/o/r/raw/{USER_TOKEN}/f"),
3552 format!("https://api.github.com/{JIT_BLOB}"),
3553 format!("https://a.com/x/{JWT}?page=2"),
3554 ] {
3555 let redacted = redact(&shape);
3556 assert!(
3557 !redacted.contains(USER_TOKEN)
3558 && !redacted.contains(JIT_BLOB)
3559 && !redacted.contains(JWT),
3560 "leaked from {shape}:\n{redacted}"
3561 );
3562 }
3563
3564 assert_eq!(
3565 redact(&format!("https://github.com/o/r/raw/{USER_TOKEN}/f")),
3566 format!("https://github.com/o/r/raw/{REDACTION}/f")
3567 );
3568
3569 // The rest of the path is exactly as diagnosable as it was: a segment
3570 // is judged on its own, and an ordinary one is not a secret.
3571 for url in [
3572 "https://api.github.com/repos/owner/repo/actions/runners",
3573 "https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/download/v2.330.0/actions-runner-linux-x64-2.330.0.tar.gz",
3574 "https://github.com/o/r.git",
3575 "https://github.com/@owner/repo",
3576 "https://api.github.com/repos/o/r/actions/runners/42",
3577 ] {
3578 assert_eq!(redact(url), url, "over-redacted a diagnosable path: {url}");
3579 }
3580 }
3581
3582 /// A large message must not take the process down.
3583 ///
3584 /// The URL branch recursed into `redact_core` on both sides of the cut. The
3585 /// termination argument was sound — every call is on a strictly shorter
3586 /// slice — and it was silent on *depth*, which was linear in the length of
3587 /// the input. A message of ~2000 URL-carrying items, about 86 KB, exited
3588 /// `0xc00000fd STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW`.
3589 ///
3590 /// **A stack overflow is not catchable — it aborts the process.** A large
3591 /// HTTP error body is attacker-influenceable content, so this was a way to
3592 /// kill the agent from inside its own log sink, which is worse than any
3593 /// leak: a sink that is not running redacts nothing.
3594 ///
3595 /// Note what this test can and cannot do. An overflow aborts the test
3596 /// binary rather than failing an assertion, so the value of this test is
3597 /// that **the suite completes at all**; the assertions below only confirm
3598 /// it did the work rather than skipping it.
3599 #[test]
3600 fn a_large_message_does_not_overflow_the_stack() {
3601 // 20000 items is ~860 KB and an order of magnitude past the ~2000 that
3602 // was measured to abort. It is also what the commit *before* the URL
3603 // branch survived, because that branch returned without recursing --
3604 // so this is a regression guard with the margin the regression had.
3605 const ITEMS: usize = 20_000;
3606 let body = r#"{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/o/r"},"#.repeat(ITEMS);
3607 assert!(body.len() > 800_000, "the premise is a large body");
3608
3609 let redacted = redact(&body);
3610 assert!(
3611 redacted.contains("https://api.github.com/repos/o/r"),
3612 "the URLs are the diagnosable part and must survive"
3613 );
3614
3615 // The same depth, reached through the structural cut and through a
3616 // credential value rather than through a bare URL.
3617 let nested = format!("{{\"error\":{{\"body\":{{\"list\":[{}]}}}}}}", body);
3618 assert!(!redact(&nested).is_empty());
3619
3620 // A long run with no URL in it at all, so the structural loop is
3621 // exercised on its own.
3622 let flat = "{\"a\":1},".repeat(ITEMS);
3623 assert!(!redact(&flat).is_empty());
3624
3625 // And one long unbroken URL, where the *path* loop is what iterates.
3626 let long_path = format!("https://a.com/{}", "seg/".repeat(ITEMS));
3627 assert!(!redact(&long_path).is_empty());
3628 }
3629
3630 #[test]
3631 fn a_credential_header_loses_its_scheme_and_its_value() {
3632 assert_eq!(
3633 redact("Authorization: Bearer abc123"),
3634 format!("Authorization: {REDACTION} {REDACTION}")
3635 );
3636 assert_eq!(
3637 redact("Authorization: Bearer abc123, Accept: application/json"),
3638 // The comma ends the header value, so the next header's name is not
3639 // swallowed.
3640 format!("Authorization: {REDACTION} {REDACTION} Accept: application/json")
3641 );
3642 assert_eq!(
3643 redact("x-api-key=hunter2"),
3644 format!("x-api-key={REDACTION}")
3645 );
3646 assert_eq!(
3647 redact("Cookie: session=abc"),
3648 format!("Cookie: {REDACTION}")
3649 );
3650
3651 // A webhook signature is not a credential the way a token is -- it is
3652 // derived, and it verifies rather than authenticates -- but it has a
3653 // SHA-256's exact shape, so the digest carve-out rendered it as a
3654 // labelled 12-character prefix rather than redacting it. Twelve hex
3655 // characters of an HMAC are of no use to anybody, which is why the
3656 // carve-out is safe in general; the header is on the list anyway,
3657 // because there is no diagnostic worth having in a signature and one
3658 // entry is cheaper than the argument.
3659 let hmac = "9f86d081884c7d659a2feaa0c55ad015a3bf4f1b2b0b822cd15d6c15b0f00a08";
3660 assert_eq!(
3661 redact(&format!("X-Hub-Signature-256: sha256={hmac}")),
3662 format!("X-Hub-Signature-256: {REDACTION}")
3663 );
3664 // Pass one puts the value's wrapping quote back, so what comes out is
3665 // still the object that went in. It used to emit
3666 // `{"x-hub-signature-256":[redacted]"}` -- an unbalanced quote in a
3667 // line this module argues has to stay diagnosable.
3668 //
3669 // This case is also `redact_core`'s two-pass witness, and the comment
3670 // there names it: the `=` comes first and names nothing, but what
3671 // follows it is a whole HMAC -- non-empty -- so a merged pass inspects
3672 // that value and returns before ever reaching the `:` that names
3673 // `x-hub-signature-256`.
3674 assert_eq!(
3675 redact(&format!("{{\"x-hub-signature-256\":\"sha256={hmac}\"}}")),
3676 format!("{{\"x-hub-signature-256\":\"{REDACTION}\"}}")
3677 );
3678 // The SHA-1 spelling GitHub still sends alongside it.
3679 assert_eq!(
3680 redact(&format!("X-Hub-Signature: sha1={hmac}")),
3681 format!("X-Hub-Signature: {REDACTION}")
3682 );
3683 // The carve-out itself is untouched: a bare digest still renders as a
3684 // prefix, because a checksum gate that cannot say which digest it got
3685 // is a gate nobody can act on.
3686 assert_eq!(redact(hmac), "sha256:9f86d081884c…");
3687 }
3688
3689 #[test]
3690 fn ordinary_text_survives_intact() {
3691 // Redaction that eats the diagnostics is redaction nobody keeps. These
3692 // are the shapes this product's own log lines actually take.
3693 for text in [
3694 "reconciliation finished",
3695 "runner exited idle without work",
3696 "desired 3, active 1, headroom 2",
3697 "attempt 9f2c1a44-0000-4000-8000-000000000001 is busy",
3698 "http 403 after 2 retries",
3699 "windows/x64 is a documented pair",
3700 ] {
3701 assert_eq!(redact(text), text, "redaction damaged an ordinary message");
3702 }
3703 }
3704
3705 /// A SHA-256 is 64 opaque characters and would otherwise be swallowed by
3706 /// the opaque-run rule. `07-security.md` makes checksum verification a
3707 /// security gate, and a gate that cannot say *which* digest it got is a
3708 /// gate nobody can act on, so a digest renders as a labelled prefix.
3709 #[test]
3710 fn a_digest_renders_as_a_prefix_rather_than_disappearing() {
3711 let digest = "9f86d081884c7d659a2feaa0c55ad015a3bf4f1b2b0b822cd15d6c15b0f00a08";
3712
3713 assert_eq!(redact(digest), "sha256:9f86d081884c…");
3714 // The point of the change: expected-versus-actual stays legible.
3715 let other = "60303ae22b998861bce3b28f33eec1be758a213c86c93c076dbe9f558c11c752";
3716 assert_ne!(
3717 redact(digest),
3718 redact(other),
3719 "two digests must stay distinguishable"
3720 );
3721
3722 // In the sentence shape `e2` will actually write.
3723 assert_eq!(
3724 redact(&format!("checksum mismatch: expected {digest} got {other}")),
3725 "checksum mismatch: expected sha256:9f86d081884c… got sha256:60303ae22b99…"
3726 );
3727
3728 // A prefix a caller logged itself is below the threshold and untouched.
3729 assert_eq!(redact(&digest[..12]), digest[..12].to_string());
3730
3731 // An already-labelled digest is labelled once, not twice, and is
3732 // truncated like a bare one.
3733 //
3734 // Before `redact_core` recursed into a `:` value this arrived at
3735 // `redact_value` whole, matched nothing there -- a `:` is not an
3736 // opaque character -- and was printed in full. Recursing hands
3737 // `as_sha256_digest` the digest on its own, which re-attaches its own
3738 // label, so the redundant one is dropped rather than doubled.
3739 //
3740 // The truncation is the part worth having: a 64-character lowercase
3741 // hex run is only *usually* a digest, an HMAC-SHA256 signature has
3742 // the same shape, and `sha256:<hmac>` used to be emitted whole.
3743 assert_eq!(redact(&format!("sha256:{digest}")), "sha256:9f86d081884c…");
3744 // The `=` spelling had the same doubling and is fixed with it; the
3745 // caller's own separator survives either way.
3746 assert_eq!(redact(&format!("sha256={digest}")), "sha256=9f86d081884c…");
3747 }
3748
3749 #[test]
3750 fn the_digest_exception_is_exactly_sixty_four_lowercase_hex_and_nothing_else() {
3751 // The narrower this carve-out is, the less there is to reason about.
3752 // Anything that is not precisely a lowercase SHA-256 stays redacted by
3753 // the opaque-run rule.
3754 let digest = "9f86d081884c7d659a2feaa0c55ad015a3bf4f1b2b0b822cd15d6c15b0f00a08";
3755
3756 assert_eq!(
3757 redact(&digest.to_ascii_uppercase()),
3758 REDACTION,
3759 "uppercase hex is not the shape this exception recognises"
3760 );
3761 assert_eq!(
3762 redact(&format!("{digest}0")),
3763 REDACTION,
3764 "65 characters is not a SHA-256"
3765 );
3766 // 64 characters of base64, which is what an encoded secret of that
3767 // length looks like: not hex, so not exempt.
3768 let base64ish = "ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA9876543210zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba98";
3769 assert_eq!(base64ish.len(), 64);
3770 assert_eq!(redact(base64ish), REDACTION);
3771
3772 // And the JIT blob, which is the thing the opaque-run rule exists for,
3773 // must not have been weakened by any of this.
3774 assert_eq!(redact(JIT_BLOB), REDACTION);
3775 }
3776
3777 #[test]
3778 fn a_uuid_survives() {
3779 // 36 characters, below the opaque-run threshold on purpose: every
3780 // identifier in this product's domain model is a UUID, and redacting
3781 // them would make the logs useless.
3782 let id = "9f2c1a44-0000-4000-8000-000000000001";
3783 assert_eq!(redact(id), id);
3784 assert!(id.len() < OPAQUE_RUN_THRESHOLD);
3785 }
3786
3787 #[test]
3788 fn redaction_preserves_whitespace_and_line_structure() {
3789 let input = "line one\nAuthorization: Bearer x\nline three";
3790 let redacted = redact(input);
3791 assert_eq!(redacted.lines().count(), 3, "{redacted}");
3792 assert!(redacted.starts_with("line one\n"), "{redacted}");
3793 assert!(redacted.ends_with("\nline three"), "{redacted}");
3794 }
3795}