Skip to main content

rucc_opt/
fold.rs

1//! Constant folding: an instruction whose operands are all constants becomes a constant.
2//!
3//! The smallest transformation there is, and the one the rest of the middle end leans on. Every
4//! later pass produces constants where the source had none, and none of them should have to
5//! evaluate the arithmetic itself.
6//!
7//! It is worth having before any of them because the lowering walk produces constant arithmetic
8//! that nothing in the C asked for. The usual arithmetic conversions widen a literal to the type
9//! of the other operand, so `long y; y + 7` lowers to a 32 bit constant, a `sext` of it and an
10//! add, and nothing downstream can see that the operand of the add is a number. On x86-64 that
11//! costs two instructions and a register on every operation between a wide integer and a
12//! literal, which is most address arithmetic and most loop bounds in real code. That is issue
13//! 378.
14//!
15//! The bit counting instructions are here for a related reason. Nothing in the backend selects an
16//! instruction for any of them yet, so each one that survives to the end becomes the twenty odd
17//! instructions of the software expansion in `rucc_codegen::expand`, inlined at the site. A
18//! `__builtin_clzll` on a value the compiler can already see is the worst version of that: the
19//! answer is a number between nought and sixty four and the code that computes it is the largest
20//! thing in the function. Folding it costs one arm here. That is part of issue 310.
21//!
22//! # How it rewrites
23//!
24//! In place. An instruction that folds keeps its result value and becomes an `iconst`, because
25//! the value it produced already has the right type and every use of it is already correct. So
26//! there is no rewriting of uses, no new value, and nothing for a later pass to have to know
27//! about. What is left behind is the old operand, now used by nothing, which costs nothing in
28//! the output because the backend materializes a constant where it is wanted rather than where
29//! the IR wrote it, and which dead code elimination will take out of the printed IR when there
30//! is one.
31//!
32//! # What it does not fold
33//!
34//! Not the divides and the remainders. Both have two cases the language leaves undefined, a zero
35//! divisor and the most negative value divided by minus one, and both want guarding rather than
36//! evaluating. They belong with the strength reduction that turns a division by a constant into
37//! a multiply, which is where somebody looking for division arithmetic will look.
38//!
39//! Not floating point arithmetic. Folding it means deciding what rounding mode to fold under and
40//! what to do about a signalling NaN, and `rucc_base::float` has the arithmetic but the decision
41//! about the environment belongs with the rest of the floating point work rather than in the first
42//! pass.
43//!
44//! Negation is folded, and is inside that boundary rather than an exception to it. 754 says a
45//! negation flips the sign bit and copies every other bit, for every input including a NaN and a
46//! zero, so it is exact, it raises nothing and it never consults the rounding mode: there is no
47//! decision about the environment in it to get wrong. The reason to bother is that C has no
48//! negative floating constant. Every one of them is a unary minus applied to a positive one, so
49//! `-1.0` arrives as an `fneg` of an `fconst`, and without this the back end makes a constant, a
50//! mask and three moves through a general register out of what should be one load. That is every
51//! negative floating literal in every program, and it is issue 1427.
52//!
53//! A bitcast of a constant is folded for the same reason and pays for the same kind of code. It is
54//! the same bits read as another type of the same width, so there is nothing to decide about it
55//! either, and what it unblocks is `fabs` and `copysign` of a constant: neither is a call, the
56//! front end lowers both to a mask over the bits, and without this the mask and the two bitcasts
57//! around it survive to the back end computing a number the compiler already has.
58//!
59//! A conversion from floating point to an integer is folded, and is inside that boundary rather
60//! than an exception to it. C says the conversion discards the fractional part, so the rounding is
61//! the language's rather than the environment's and nothing anybody sets at run time reaches it.
62//! What is left is a value whose truncation does not fit the destination type, and a NaN, and both
63//! of those are undefined rather than a number: `rucc_base::float::Float::to_integer` reports each
64//! as `Status::INVALID` and neither folds, which is the rule below for an add that overflows under
65//! `nsw` applied to the same kind of program. That is issue 1357.
66//!
67//! Not an operation that overflows under `nsw` or `nuw`. The result there is poison, so any
68//! answer would be a valid refinement, and quietly picking the wrapping one hides a program that
69//! has stepped outside the language from the sanitizer that should be reporting it.
70//!
71//! Not floating point comparisons, for the reason above and one more: an ordered predicate and an
72//! unordered one differ only on a NaN, so the answer is the whole of what makes them two
73//! predicates, and evaluating it is the floating point decision rather than a step around it.
74//!
75//! Integer comparisons are folded, and were not until issue 352 was closed. An `icmp` produces an
76//! `i1`, and while nothing lowered one that was left standing on its own, folding one would have
77//! turned working code into code that does not build. There is now a rule for a one bit constant
78//! and one for a byte holding it, so the constant this leaves behind lowers wherever the
79//! comparison did.
80
81use rucc_base::float::{Float, Status};
82use rucc_ir::{Block, Def, Extra, Flags, Func, Imm, Inst, IntPred, Opcode, Type, Value};
83
84use crate::{Analyses, Analysis, Fuel, Pass, Preserved, Stats};
85
86/// Recorded once for each instruction that became a constant.
87const FOLDED: &str = "instruction with constant operands folded to a constant";
88
89/// Recorded for an instruction that would have folded if there had been fuel for it.
90///
91/// Not a missed optimization in the ordinary sense, since the fuel is a person deliberately
92/// stopping the pass. It is here because it is the number a bisection is searching for: the count
93/// of sites past the cut is how far there is left to go.
94const NO_FUEL: &str = "instruction not folded, the pass ran out of fuel";
95
96/// The pass. It holds nothing, because folding needs to know nothing beyond the instruction.
97#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
98pub struct Fold;
99
100impl Pass for Fold {
101    fn name(&self) -> &'static str {
102        "fold"
103    }
104
105    fn describe(&self) -> &'static str {
106        "an instruction whose operands are all constants becomes a constant"
107    }
108
109    fn preserves(&self) -> Preserved {
110        // An instruction becomes a constant where it stands. No block moves, no edge moves,
111        // and a terminator is not one of the instructions this folds, so every analysis in the
112        // cache is about the same graph afterwards as it was before. Not the liveness, though:
113        // the operands the folded instruction read are read by nobody now, and a value whose
114        // last reader went is live over less of the function than it was.
115        Preserved::ALL.without(Analysis::Liveness)
116    }
117
118    fn run(&self, func: &mut Func, _an: &mut Analyses, fuel: &mut Fuel) -> Stats {
119        let blocks: Vec<Block> = func.blocks().collect();
120        let mut stats = Stats::new();
121        for block in blocks {
122            let insts: Vec<Inst> = func.insts(block).collect();
123            for inst in insts {
124                let Some(folded) = evaluate(func, inst) else { continue };
125                if !fuel.take() {
126                    // Out of fuel, which is a request to stop transforming rather than to stop
127                    // looking. Continuing the walk costs nothing and keeps the count of what
128                    // could have been folded the same at every fuel setting, which is what makes
129                    // a bisection over it monotonic.
130                    stats.missed(NO_FUEL);
131                    continue;
132                }
133                let ty = func[result_of(func, inst)].ty;
134                let at = func.add_imm(folded);
135                let data = &mut func[inst];
136                // Which constant instruction holds the answer is the result type's question and
137                // not the folded instruction's. An `fneg` and a bitcast out of an integer both
138                // answer in a floating point type and the rest of what folds here answers in an
139                // integer one, and an immediate is the same bits either way.
140                data.opcode = if ty.is_int() { Opcode::IConst } else { Opcode::FConst };
141                data.flags = Flags::NONE;
142                data.args = rucc_ir::ValueList::EMPTY;
143                data.extra = Extra::Imm(at);
144                stats.optimized(FOLDED);
145            }
146        }
147        stats
148    }
149}
150
151/// The single result of an instruction that folded.
152fn result_of(func: &Func, inst: Inst) -> Value {
153    func[inst].results().next().expect("an instruction that folds produces a value")
154}
155
156/// What this instruction evaluates to, if it evaluates to anything.
157///
158/// `None` covers every reason not to fold and does not distinguish between them, because the
159/// answer to all of them is the same: leave the instruction alone.
160fn evaluate(func: &Func, inst: Inst) -> Option<Imm> {
161    let data = &func[inst];
162    if data.results != 1 {
163        return None;
164    }
165    let result = data.results().next()?;
166    let ty = func[result].ty;
167    // A vector constant is a `splat` rather than an `iconst` or an `fconst`, so a vector fold
168    // would have to build a different instruction and would have to be right about the lane
169    // count as well.
170    if !ty.is_scalar() {
171        return None;
172    }
173    let args = &func[data.args];
174    // The two that are the bits and nothing else, and the only two here whose answer can have a
175    // floating point type. They are above the gate below rather than inside the match under it
176    // because that gate is what keeps the rest of this file about integers.
177    match data.opcode {
178        Opcode::FNeg => return negated(func, *args.first()?, ty),
179        Opcode::Bitcast => return reinterpreted(func, *args.first()?, ty),
180        _ => {}
181    }
182    if !ty.is_int() {
183        return None;
184    }
185    match data.opcode {
186        Opcode::Trunc | Opcode::SExt | Opcode::ZExt => {
187            let (value, from) = constant(func, *args.first()?)?;
188            Some(convert(data.opcode, value, from, ty))
189        }
190        Opcode::Shl | Opcode::LShr | Opcode::AShr => {
191            let (value, from) = constant(func, *args.first()?)?;
192            let (count, count_ty) = constant(func, *args.get(1)?)?;
193            shift(data.opcode, value, from, count, count_ty, ty, data.flags)
194        }
195        Opcode::Add | Opcode::Sub | Opcode::Mul | Opcode::And | Opcode::Or | Opcode::Xor => {
196            let (lhs, lhs_ty) = constant(func, *args.first()?)?;
197            let (rhs, _) = constant(func, *args.get(1)?)?;
198            binary(data.opcode, lhs, rhs, lhs_ty, ty, data.flags)
199        }
200        Opcode::Ctlz | Opcode::Cttz | Opcode::Ctpop | Opcode::Bswap | Opcode::Bitreverse => {
201            let (value, from) = constant(func, *args.first()?)?;
202            count(data.opcode, value, from, ty)
203        }
204        Opcode::FPToSI | Opcode::FPToUI => {
205            let value = floating(func, *args.first()?)?;
206            to_integer(value, ty, data.opcode == Opcode::FPToSI)
207        }
208        Opcode::ICmp => {
209            let Extra::IntPred(pred) = data.extra else { return None };
210            let (lhs, from) = constant(func, *args.first()?)?;
211            let (rhs, _) = constant(func, *args.get(1)?)?;
212            Some(Imm::int(i128::from(compare(pred, lhs, rhs, from)), ty))
213        }
214        _ => None,
215    }
216}
217
218/// The bits a value holds, if it is a constant of either kind.
219///
220/// Both kinds, because the two rewrites above this are about the bits and do not care which of
221/// them they were written as. A constant of either is one instruction with one immediate, and an
222/// immediate is the bits.
223fn bits_of(func: &Func, value: Value) -> Option<u128> {
224    let Def::Result { inst, .. } = func[value].def else { return None };
225    let data = &func[inst];
226    if !matches!(data.opcode, Opcode::IConst | Opcode::FConst) {
227        return None;
228    }
229    let Extra::Imm(at) = data.extra else { return None };
230    Some(func[at].bits())
231}
232
233/// A negation of a floating point constant, which is that constant with its sign bit flipped.
234///
235/// This is the one piece of floating point arithmetic that folds, and it is inside the boundary
236/// the file header draws rather than an exception to it. Negation is not arithmetic in the sense
237/// that boundary is about: 754 says it flips the sign bit and copies every other bit, for every
238/// input including a NaN and a zero, so it is exact, it raises nothing and it never consults the
239/// rounding mode. There is no decision about the environment to get wrong.
240///
241/// The reason to bother is that C has no negative floating constant. Every one of them is a unary
242/// minus applied to a positive one, so `-1.0` arrives here as an `fneg` of an `fconst` and stays
243/// that way, and what the back end makes of it is a constant, a mask and three moves through a
244/// general register where one load would do. That is every negative floating literal in every
245/// program, and it is issue 1427.
246///
247/// The sign bit is the top bit of the value and not of the object it is stored in. An `f80` is
248/// eighty bits of value in a hundred and twenty eight of storage, and [`Type::bits`] answers
249/// eighty for it, which is the bit this has to flip.
250fn negated(func: &Func, operand: Value, ty: Type) -> Option<Imm> {
251    if !ty.is_float() {
252        return None;
253    }
254    let bits = bits_of(func, operand)?;
255    Some(Imm::from_bits(bits ^ 1u128 << (ty.bits() - 1)))
256}
257
258/// A bitcast of a constant, which is the same bits read as another type of the same width.
259///
260/// It folds in both directions, and the one that pays is out of an integer, because that is what
261/// `fabs` and `copysign` leave behind. Neither is a call: the front end lowers both to a mask over
262/// the bits, so `fabs (1.0)` is a bitcast of an `and` of a bitcast, and without this the three
263/// survive to the back end and compute a number the compiler already has.
264///
265/// The widths are checked rather than assumed. The verifier requires them to match and a fold that
266/// quietly widened or narrowed a constant would be a wrong answer rather than a refused one, which
267/// is not a thing to leave to another pass being right.
268fn reinterpreted(func: &Func, operand: Value, ty: Type) -> Option<Imm> {
269    let from = func[operand].ty;
270    if !from.is_scalar() || from.bits() != ty.bits() {
271        return None;
272    }
273    let bits = bits_of(func, operand)?;
274    Some(Imm::from_bits(bits))
275}
276
277/// The constant this value is, with the type it has, if it is one.
278///
279/// Shared with [`crate::simplify_cfg`], which asks the same question about the condition of a
280/// branch. Asking it in two places would be two answers about what a constant is.
281pub(crate) fn constant(func: &Func, value: Value) -> Option<(Imm, Type)> {
282    let Def::Result { inst, .. } = func[value].def else { return None };
283    if func[inst].opcode != Opcode::IConst {
284        return None;
285    }
286    let Extra::Imm(at) = func[inst].extra else { return None };
287    let ty = func[value].ty;
288    ty.is_int().then(|| (func[at], ty))
289}
290
291/// The floating point constant this value is, read in the format its own type gives it.
292///
293/// An `fconst` stores the bits and the type says how to read them, which is why this is one
294/// function and not a pair of them: the bits of an `f80` and the bits of an `f128` are the same
295/// hundred and twenty eight bits and mean different numbers.
296fn floating(func: &Func, value: Value) -> Option<Float> {
297    let Def::Result { inst, .. } = func[value].def else { return None };
298    if func[inst].opcode != Opcode::FConst {
299        return None;
300    }
301    let Extra::Imm(at) = func[inst].extra else { return None };
302    let format = func[value].ty.format()?.encoding();
303    Some(Float::from_bits(format, func[at].bits()))
304}
305
306/// A conversion of a floating point constant to an integer, and nothing when C does not say what
307/// the answer is.
308///
309/// The two undefined cases are a number whose truncation is outside the destination type and a
310/// NaN, and `to_integer` reports both as [`Status::INVALID`] rather than answering. Folding either
311/// would be picking one refinement of poison and writing it into the program, which is what this
312/// pass declines to do for an add that overflows under `nsw` and declines to do here for the same
313/// reason.
314fn to_integer(value: Float, to: Type, signed: bool) -> Option<Imm> {
315    let (number, status) = value.to_integer(to.bits(), signed);
316    (!status.has(Status::INVALID)).then(|| Imm::int(number, to))
317}
318
319/// A widening or a narrowing of a constant.
320fn convert(opcode: Opcode, value: Imm, from: Type, to: Type) -> Imm {
321    match opcode {
322        // Truncation is the masking that `Imm::int` does anyway, and sign extension is reading
323        // the value as signed at its own width and storing it at the wider one.
324        Opcode::Trunc | Opcode::SExt => Imm::int(value.signed(from), to),
325        // Zero extension reads the same bits as unsigned, which for a width below 128 is a
326        // non-negative number and survives the cast to the signed type `Imm::int` takes.
327        _ => Imm::int(value.unsigned() as i128, to),
328    }
329}
330
331/// A shift of a constant by a constant.
332///
333/// `None` when the count is not one the language defines, which is a count at or above the width
334/// of the value. The result there is poison and folding it would be picking an answer for a
335/// program that asked for none.
336fn shift(
337    opcode: Opcode,
338    value: Imm,
339    from: Type,
340    count: Imm,
341    count_ty: Type,
342    to: Type,
343    flags: Flags,
344) -> Option<Imm> {
345    let by = count.unsigned();
346    if by >= u128::from(to.bits()) || count.signed(count_ty) < 0 {
347        return None;
348    }
349    let by = by as u32;
350    let exact = match opcode {
351        Opcode::Shl => value.signed(from).checked_shl(by)?,
352        // A logical shift right is on the bits rather than on the number, so it reads unsigned
353        // and the cast back cannot lose anything: the value has at most `from.bits()` bits set
354        // and shifting right sets none.
355        Opcode::LShr => (value.unsigned() >> by) as i128,
356        _ => value.signed(from) >> by,
357    };
358    if opcode == Opcode::Shl && overflowed(exact, to, flags) {
359        return None;
360    }
361    Some(Imm::int(exact, to))
362}
363
364/// An arithmetic or bitwise operation on two constants.
365fn binary(opcode: Opcode, lhs: Imm, rhs: Imm, from: Type, to: Type, flags: Flags) -> Option<Imm> {
366    let (a, b) = (lhs.signed(from), rhs.signed(from));
367    let exact = match opcode {
368        // The bitwise three cannot overflow and are the same operation whichever way the
369        // operands are read, so they take the signed reading and are done.
370        Opcode::And => a & b,
371        Opcode::Or => a | b,
372        Opcode::Xor => a ^ b,
373        // The arithmetic three are computed at 128 bits and then asked whether they fit. A type
374        // of 128 bits is the one case where the checked form is doing real work rather than
375        // being a formality, and it is why these are checked rather than wrapping.
376        Opcode::Add => a.checked_add(b)?,
377        Opcode::Sub => a.checked_sub(b)?,
378        _ => a.checked_mul(b)?,
379    };
380    if overflowed(exact, to, flags) {
381        return None;
382    }
383    Some(Imm::int(exact, to))
384}
385
386/// What a comparison of two constants comes out as.
387///
388/// Shared with [`crate::simplify_cfg`], which asks the same question about the condition of a
389/// branch it is deciding the direction of. Two answers about what `slt` means would be one too
390/// many, and the two places would not be checked against each other by anything.
391///
392/// The type is the one the operands have rather than the `i1` the answer has, since that is the
393/// width the comparison is at and the only thing the reading depends on. The two equalities are
394/// the same question whichever way the bits are read, so they compare the immediates directly:
395/// an immediate holds its value in exactly the width of its type, which is what makes that
396/// equality the equality on the numbers.
397pub(crate) fn compare(pred: IntPred, lhs: Imm, rhs: Imm, ty: Type) -> bool {
398    match pred {
399        IntPred::Eq => lhs == rhs,
400        IntPred::Ne => lhs != rhs,
401        IntPred::Slt => lhs.signed(ty) < rhs.signed(ty),
402        IntPred::Sle => lhs.signed(ty) <= rhs.signed(ty),
403        IntPred::Sgt => lhs.signed(ty) > rhs.signed(ty),
404        IntPred::Sge => lhs.signed(ty) >= rhs.signed(ty),
405        IntPred::Ult => lhs.unsigned() < rhs.unsigned(),
406        IntPred::Ule => lhs.unsigned() <= rhs.unsigned(),
407        IntPred::Ugt => lhs.unsigned() > rhs.unsigned(),
408        IntPred::Uge => lhs.unsigned() >= rhs.unsigned(),
409    }
410}
411
412/// One of the five bit operations on a constant.
413///
414/// All five are on the bits rather than on the number, so all five read the value unsigned. An
415/// immediate is stored with everything above its own width cleared, so the bits of a value of a
416/// narrow type are already in the low end of a 128 bit word with zeroes above them, and the whole
417/// of the work here is putting the answer back at the width it was asked at.
418///
419/// The two searches answer the width for a zero argument. C leaves `__builtin_clz(0)` and
420/// `__builtin_ctz(0)` undefined so nothing is entitled to that answer, but it is the answer the
421/// software expansion in `rucc_codegen::expand` gives and `__builtin_ffs` is built on top of it, so
422/// folding to anything else here would make the same program answer two different things depending
423/// on whether the argument was visible. That is a worse outcome than either answer on its own.
424///
425/// A byte swap of a width that is not a whole number of bytes is left alone, which is what the
426/// expansion does with one too. The verifier does not allow one and quietly reversing something
427/// else would be worse than the instruction surviving to a selector that says it has no rule.
428fn count(opcode: Opcode, value: Imm, from: Type, to: Type) -> Option<Imm> {
429    let width = from.bits();
430    if width == 0 || width > 128 {
431        return None;
432    }
433    // The bits of the word that are above the value's own type, which is how far a whole word
434    // answer has to come back down. Both ends of the range above are ruled out for it: a shift by
435    // the width of the word is not defined and a width of nought has no bits to answer about.
436    let spare = 128 - width;
437    let bits = value.unsigned();
438    let answer = match opcode {
439        Opcode::Ctpop => i128::from(bits.count_ones()),
440        // The zeroes above the type are counted by the word and are not the value's, so they come
441        // off. For a zero value that leaves the width, which is the answer wanted.
442        Opcode::Ctlz => i128::from(bits.leading_zeros() - spare),
443        // Trailing zeroes need no correction because the zeroes above the type are above every
444        // set bit, except for a zero value, where the word answers 128 and the width is wanted.
445        Opcode::Cttz => i128::from(bits.trailing_zeros().min(width)),
446        Opcode::Bswap if width % 8 == 0 => (bits.swap_bytes() >> spare) as i128,
447        Opcode::Bitreverse => (bits.reverse_bits() >> spare) as i128,
448        _ => return None,
449    };
450    Some(Imm::int(answer, to))
451}
452
453/// Whether storing `exact` at `to` would lose something the flags promised would not happen.
454///
455/// An operation with neither flag wraps, and wrapping is defined, so the answer there is no
456/// however far outside the type the exact result is.
457fn overflowed(exact: i128, to: Type, flags: Flags) -> bool {
458    let stored = Imm::int(exact, to);
459    if flags.contains(Flags::NSW) && stored.signed(to) != exact {
460        return true;
461    }
462    flags.contains(Flags::NUW) && (exact < 0 || stored.unsigned() != exact as u128)
463}
464
465#[cfg(test)]
466mod tests {
467    use rucc_base::Interner;
468    use rucc_base::float::Format;
469    use rucc_ir::{
470        Block, Builder, Extra, Flags, Float, Func, IntPred, Module, Opcode, Signature, Type, Value,
471    };
472    use rucc_target::{Arch, Env, Os, TargetInfo, Triple};
473
474    use crate::stats::Kind;
475    use crate::{Fuel, Pass, fold::Fold};
476
477    /// A function with one block, ready to have instructions appended to it.
478    fn blank() -> (Interner, Func, Block) {
479        let mut names = Interner::new();
480        let name = names.intern("f");
481        let mut func = Func::new(name, Signature::new().with_returns(&[Type::int(64)]));
482        let block = func.create_block();
483        (names, func, block)
484    }
485
486    /// Runs the pass over the function with as much fuel as it wants, and says whether it
487    /// rewrote anything.
488    fn fold(func: &mut Func) -> bool {
489        Fold.run(func, &mut crate::machine::fixtures::analyses(), &mut Fuel::unlimited()).changed()
490    }
491
492    /// An `fconst` of the number this text spells, in the format the type gives it.
493    ///
494    /// Through `rucc_base::float` rather than through the host's `f64`, for the reason that module
495    /// exists: the bits a literal means are the target's answer and not the machine running the
496    /// test's.
497    fn number(build: &mut Builder<'_>, text: &str, ty: Type) -> Value {
498        let format = ty.format().expect("a floating point type").encoding();
499        let (value, _) = super::Float::parse(text, format).expect("a number");
500        build.fconst(ty, value.to_bits())
501    }
502
503    /// The constant a value now holds, or `None` if it is not one.
504    fn value_of(func: &Func, value: Value, ty: Type) -> Option<i128> {
505        let rucc_ir::Def::Result { inst, .. } = func[value].def else { return None };
506        if func[inst].opcode != Opcode::IConst {
507            return None;
508        }
509        let Extra::Imm(at) = func[inst].extra else { return None };
510        Some(func[at].signed(ty))
511    }
512
513    /// The bits a value now holds, or `None` if it is not a floating point constant.
514    fn float_bits(func: &Func, value: Value) -> Option<u128> {
515        let rucc_ir::Def::Result { inst, .. } = func[value].def else { return None };
516        if func[inst].opcode != Opcode::FConst {
517            return None;
518        }
519        let Extra::Imm(at) = func[inst].extra else { return None };
520        Some(func[at].bits())
521    }
522
523    /// C has no negative floating constant, so `-1.0` is a unary minus on a positive one and
524    /// arrives here as two instructions. This is the fold that makes it one.
525    #[test]
526    fn a_negated_floating_constant_becomes_a_constant() {
527        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
528        let ty = Type::float(Float::F64);
529        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
530        let one = number(&mut build, "1.0", ty);
531        let minus = build.unary(Opcode::FNeg, one, ty);
532        build.ret(&[minus]);
533        assert!(fold(&mut func));
534        assert_eq!(float_bits(&func, minus), Some(0xbff0_0000_0000_0000));
535    }
536
537    /// Negation is the sign bit and nothing else, which is what lets it fold at all, and a
538    /// negative zero is where that shows: the value is equal to a positive zero and the bits are
539    /// not, so anything that went through a comparison would give the wrong answer here.
540    #[test]
541    fn a_negated_zero_keeps_its_sign_bit() {
542        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
543        let ty = Type::float(Float::F64);
544        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
545        let zero = number(&mut build, "0.0", ty);
546        let minus = build.unary(Opcode::FNeg, zero, ty);
547        build.ret(&[minus]);
548        assert!(fold(&mut func));
549        assert_eq!(float_bits(&func, minus), Some(1 << 63));
550    }
551
552    /// The same for a NaN, whose payload goes through untouched. 754 says negation copies every
553    /// bit but the sign for every input, and a NaN is the input where a compiler that quietly did
554    /// arithmetic instead would be caught.
555    #[test]
556    fn a_negated_nan_keeps_its_payload() {
557        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
558        let ty = Type::float(Float::F64);
559        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
560        let nan = build.fconst(ty, 0x7ff8_0000_dead_beef);
561        let minus = build.unary(Opcode::FNeg, nan, ty);
562        build.ret(&[minus]);
563        assert!(fold(&mut func));
564        assert_eq!(float_bits(&func, minus), Some(0xfff8_0000_dead_beef));
565    }
566
567    /// The sign bit of an `f80` is the top bit of the eighty the value has and not of the hundred
568    /// and twenty eight the object is stored in, which is the one place this could be written
569    /// wrong and give a number nobody asked for.
570    #[test]
571    fn the_sign_bit_of_an_x87_value_is_the_top_bit_of_its_width() {
572        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
573        let ty = Type::float(Float::F80);
574        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
575        let one = number(&mut build, "1.0", ty);
576        let minus = build.unary(Opcode::FNeg, one, ty);
577        build.ret(&[minus]);
578        assert!(fold(&mut func));
579        let bits = float_bits(&func, minus).expect("a constant");
580        assert_eq!(bits >> 79 & 1, 1, "the sign bit is set");
581        assert_eq!(bits >> 80, 0, "nothing above the value is touched");
582    }
583
584    /// A bitcast of a constant is the same bits read as another type, which is what `fabs` of a
585    /// constant needs: the front end lowers it to a mask over the bits rather than to a call, so
586    /// folding it away is three instructions rather than one.
587    #[test]
588    fn a_bitcast_of_a_constant_is_the_same_bits() {
589        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
590        let ty = Type::float(Float::F64);
591        let bits = Type::int(64);
592        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
593        let value = number(&mut build, "-3.5", ty);
594        let number = build.unary(Opcode::Bitcast, value, bits);
595        let mask = build.iconst(bits, i128::from(i64::MAX));
596        let cleared = build.binary(Opcode::And, number, mask, Flags::NONE);
597        let back = build.unary(Opcode::Bitcast, cleared, ty);
598        build.ret(&[back]);
599        assert!(fold(&mut func));
600        assert_eq!(float_bits(&func, back), Some(0x400c_0000_0000_0000));
601    }
602
603    /// A bitcast whose operand is not a constant is left alone, which is the case nearly every
604    /// bitcast in a real function is.
605    #[test]
606    fn a_bitcast_of_something_that_is_not_a_constant_is_left_alone() {
607        let mut names = Interner::new();
608        let name = names.intern("f");
609        let ty = Type::float(Float::F64);
610        let signature = Signature::new().with_params(&[ty]).with_returns(&[Type::int(64)]);
611        let mut func = Func::new(name, signature);
612        let block = func.create_block();
613        let x = func.append_param(block, ty);
614        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
615        let number = build.unary(Opcode::Bitcast, x, Type::int(64));
616        build.ret(&[number]);
617        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
618        assert_eq!(value_of(&func, number, Type::int(64)), None);
619    }
620
621    #[test]
622    fn a_widened_constant_becomes_a_constant_of_the_wider_type() {
623        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
624        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
625        let narrow = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 7);
626        let wide = build.unary(Opcode::SExt, narrow, Type::int(64));
627        build.ret(&[wide]);
628        assert!(fold(&mut func));
629        assert_eq!(value_of(&func, wide, Type::int(64)), Some(7));
630    }
631
632    #[test]
633    fn sign_extension_copies_the_sign_and_zero_extension_does_not() {
634        for (opcode, expected) in [(Opcode::SExt, -1_i128), (Opcode::ZExt, 0xffff_ffff)] {
635            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
636            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
637            let narrow = build.iconst(Type::int(32), -1);
638            let wide = build.unary(opcode, narrow, Type::int(64));
639            build.ret(&[wide]);
640            assert!(fold(&mut func));
641            assert_eq!(value_of(&func, wide, Type::int(64)), Some(expected), "{opcode:?}");
642        }
643    }
644
645    #[test]
646    fn truncation_keeps_the_low_bits_and_reads_them_at_the_narrow_width() {
647        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
648        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
649        let wide = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 0x1234_5680);
650        let narrow = build.unary(Opcode::Trunc, wide, Type::int(8));
651        build.ret(&[narrow]);
652        assert!(fold(&mut func));
653        assert_eq!(value_of(&func, narrow, Type::int(8)), Some(-128));
654    }
655
656    #[test]
657    fn the_arithmetic_and_the_bitwise_operations_are_evaluated() {
658        let cases = [
659            (Opcode::Add, 6_i128, 7_i128, 13_i128),
660            (Opcode::Sub, 6, 7, -1),
661            (Opcode::Mul, 6, 7, 42),
662            (Opcode::And, 0b1100, 0b1010, 0b1000),
663            (Opcode::Or, 0b1100, 0b1010, 0b1110),
664            (Opcode::Xor, 0b1100, 0b1010, 0b0110),
665        ];
666        for (opcode, a, b, want) in cases {
667            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
668            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
669            let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), a);
670            let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), b);
671            let out = build.binary(opcode, lhs, rhs, Flags::NONE);
672            build.ret(&[out]);
673            assert!(fold(&mut func), "{opcode:?}");
674            assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(64)), Some(want), "{opcode:?}");
675        }
676    }
677
678    #[test]
679    fn the_three_shifts_are_evaluated_and_the_two_right_ones_differ_on_the_sign() {
680        let cases = [(Opcode::Shl, -8_i128, 1_i128, -16_i128), (Opcode::AShr, -8, 1, -4)];
681        for (opcode, a, b, want) in cases {
682            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
683            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
684            let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), a);
685            let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), b);
686            let out = build.binary(opcode, lhs, rhs, Flags::NONE);
687            build.ret(&[out]);
688            assert!(fold(&mut func), "{opcode:?}");
689            assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(64)), Some(want), "{opcode:?}");
690        }
691        // The logical shift is the one that reads the value as bits, so minus eight shifted
692        // right by one is a very large positive number rather than minus four.
693        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
694        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
695        let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), -8);
696        let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), 1);
697        let out = build.binary(Opcode::LShr, lhs, rhs, Flags::NONE);
698        build.ret(&[out]);
699        assert!(fold(&mut func));
700        assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(64)), Some(i128::from(i64::MAX) - 3));
701    }
702
703    /// The one instruction under test, on one constant, folded as far as the pass takes it.
704    fn one(opcode: Opcode, ty: Type, arg: i128) -> Option<i128> {
705        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
706        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
707        let value = build.iconst(ty, arg);
708        let out = build.unary(opcode, value, ty);
709        build.ret(&[out]);
710        fold(&mut func);
711        value_of(&func, out, ty)
712    }
713
714    #[test]
715    fn the_bit_counts_are_evaluated_at_the_width_they_were_asked_at() {
716        let cases = [
717            (Opcode::Ctlz, 64, 0x0000_1000_0000_0000_i128, 19_i128),
718            (Opcode::Ctlz, 32, 0x0000_1000, 19),
719            (Opcode::Cttz, 64, 0x0000_1000_0000_0000, 44),
720            (Opcode::Cttz, 32, 0x0000_1000, 12),
721            (Opcode::Ctpop, 64, 0x0000_1000_0000_0000, 1),
722            (Opcode::Ctpop, 32, -1, 32),
723            (Opcode::Ctpop, 64, -1, 64),
724        ];
725        for (opcode, width, arg, want) in cases {
726            let ty = Type::int(width);
727            assert_eq!(one(opcode, ty, arg), Some(want), "{opcode:?} at {width} of {arg:#x}");
728        }
729    }
730
731    #[test]
732    fn a_search_for_a_bit_in_a_zero_answers_the_width_the_expansion_answers() {
733        for width in [8_u32, 16, 32, 64] {
734            let ty = Type::int(width);
735            let want = Some(i128::from(width));
736            assert_eq!(one(Opcode::Ctlz, ty, 0), want, "leading, at {width}");
737            assert_eq!(one(Opcode::Cttz, ty, 0), want, "trailing, at {width}");
738            assert_eq!(one(Opcode::Ctpop, ty, 0), Some(0), "count, at {width}");
739        }
740    }
741
742    #[test]
743    fn the_two_reversals_are_evaluated_and_a_byte_swap_of_a_part_of_a_byte_is_not() {
744        let ty = Type::int(32);
745        assert_eq!(one(Opcode::Bswap, ty, 0x1234_5678), Some(0x7856_3412));
746        assert_eq!(one(Opcode::Bswap, Type::int(16), 0x1234), Some(0x3412));
747        assert_eq!(one(Opcode::Bitreverse, Type::int(8), 0b1010_1100), Some(0b0011_0101));
748        // A width that is not a whole number of bytes has no byte swap, so there is nothing to
749        // evaluate and the instruction stays for the backend to refuse.
750        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
751        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
752        let value = build.iconst(Type::int(4), 0b1010);
753        let out = build.unary(Opcode::Bswap, value, Type::int(4));
754        build.ret(&[out]);
755        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
756    }
757
758    #[test]
759    fn a_comparison_of_two_constants_becomes_a_one_or_a_nought() {
760        let cases = [
761            (IntPred::Eq, 7_i128, 7_i128, true),
762            (IntPred::Eq, 7, 8, false),
763            (IntPred::Ne, 7, 8, true),
764            (IntPred::Slt, -1, 1, true),
765            (IntPred::Sle, -1, -1, true),
766            (IntPred::Sgt, -1, 1, false),
767            (IntPred::Sge, 1, -1, true),
768            // The same pair read as bits rather than as numbers, where minus one is the largest
769            // value there is and every unsigned answer is the opposite of the signed one.
770            (IntPred::Ult, -1, 1, false),
771            (IntPred::Ule, -1, 1, false),
772            (IntPred::Ugt, -1, 1, true),
773            (IntPred::Uge, -1, 1, true),
774        ];
775        for (pred, a, b, want) in cases {
776            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
777            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
778            let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), a);
779            let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), b);
780            let out = build.icmp(pred, lhs, rhs);
781            build.ret(&[out]);
782            assert!(fold(&mut func), "{pred:?} {a} {b}");
783            // The answer is one bit, where a set bit read as a signed number is minus one, so
784            // the question is which of the two constants it is rather than what it prints as.
785            let got = value_of(&func, out, Type::I1).expect("the comparison folded");
786            assert_eq!(got != 0, want, "{pred:?} {a} {b}");
787        }
788    }
789
790    #[test]
791    fn a_comparison_at_a_narrow_width_is_read_at_that_width() {
792        // Two hundred and fifty five stored in eight bits is minus one, so it is below one when
793        // the comparison is signed and above it when the comparison is not.
794        let ty = Type::int(8);
795        for (pred, want) in [(IntPred::Slt, true), (IntPred::Ult, false)] {
796            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
797            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
798            let lhs = build.iconst(ty, 255);
799            let rhs = build.iconst(ty, 1);
800            let out = build.icmp(pred, lhs, rhs);
801            build.ret(&[out]);
802            assert!(fold(&mut func), "{pred:?}");
803            let got = value_of(&func, out, Type::I1).expect("the comparison folded");
804            assert_eq!(got != 0, want, "{pred:?}");
805        }
806    }
807
808    #[test]
809    fn a_comparison_with_one_constant_operand_is_left_alone() {
810        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
811        let ty = Type::int(64);
812        let param = func.append_param(block, ty);
813        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
814        let rhs = build.iconst(ty, 3);
815        let out = build.icmp(IntPred::Eq, param, rhs);
816        build.ret(&[out]);
817        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
818    }
819
820    #[test]
821    fn a_bit_count_of_something_that_is_not_a_constant_is_left_alone() {
822        for opcode in [Opcode::Ctlz, Opcode::Cttz, Opcode::Ctpop, Opcode::Bswap] {
823            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
824            let ty = Type::int(64);
825            let param = func.append_param(block, ty);
826            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
827            let out = build.unary(opcode, param, ty);
828            build.ret(&[out]);
829            assert!(!fold(&mut func), "{opcode:?}");
830        }
831    }
832
833    #[test]
834    fn a_shift_by_the_width_or_more_is_left_alone_because_the_language_does_not_define_it() {
835        for count in [64_i128, 65, -1] {
836            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
837            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
838            let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), 1);
839            let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), count);
840            let out = build.binary(Opcode::Shl, lhs, rhs, Flags::NONE);
841            build.ret(&[out]);
842            assert!(!fold(&mut func), "a shift by {count} was folded");
843        }
844    }
845
846    #[test]
847    fn an_operation_that_wraps_folds_and_the_same_one_promising_it_will_not_does_not() {
848        let big = i128::from(i32::MAX);
849        for (flags, folds) in [(Flags::NONE, true), (Flags::NSW, false)] {
850            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
851            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
852            let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(32), big);
853            let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 1);
854            let out = build.binary(Opcode::Add, lhs, rhs, flags);
855            build.ret(&[out]);
856            assert_eq!(fold(&mut func), folds, "{flags}");
857            if folds {
858                assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(32)), Some(i128::from(i32::MIN)));
859            }
860        }
861    }
862
863    #[test]
864    fn an_unsigned_promise_is_broken_by_a_negative_result_as_well_as_by_a_large_one() {
865        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
866        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
867        let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 1);
868        let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 2);
869        let out = build.binary(Opcode::Sub, lhs, rhs, Flags::NUW);
870        build.ret(&[out]);
871        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
872    }
873
874    #[test]
875    fn an_operation_with_one_constant_operand_is_left_alone() {
876        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
877        let param = func.append_param(block, Type::int(64));
878        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
879        let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), 7);
880        let out = build.binary(Opcode::Add, param, rhs, Flags::NONE);
881        build.ret(&[out]);
882        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
883        assert_eq!(func[out_inst(&func, out)].opcode, Opcode::Add);
884    }
885
886    #[test]
887    fn a_conversion_to_an_integer_truncates_toward_zero() {
888        for (text, expected) in [("2.75", 2_i128), ("-2.75", -2), ("0.5", 0), ("-0.5", 0)] {
889            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
890            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
891            let value = number(&mut build, text, Type::float(Float::F64));
892            let out = build.unary(Opcode::FPToSI, value, Type::int(32));
893            build.ret(&[out]);
894            assert!(fold(&mut func), "{text}");
895            assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(32)), Some(expected), "{text}");
896        }
897    }
898
899    #[test]
900    fn a_negative_number_converts_to_an_unsigned_type_only_when_truncating_lands_on_zero() {
901        for (text, expected) in [("-0.5", Some(0)), ("-1.5", None)] {
902            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
903            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
904            let value = number(&mut build, text, Type::float(Float::F64));
905            let out = build.unary(Opcode::FPToUI, value, Type::int(32));
906            build.ret(&[out]);
907            assert_eq!(fold(&mut func), expected.is_some(), "{text}");
908            assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(32)), expected, "{text}");
909        }
910    }
911
912    #[test]
913    fn a_number_the_destination_type_has_no_room_for_is_left_alone() {
914        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
915        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
916        let value = number(&mut build, "1e30", Type::float(Float::F64));
917        let out = build.unary(Opcode::FPToSI, value, Type::int(32));
918        build.ret(&[out]);
919        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
920        assert_eq!(func[out_inst(&func, out)].opcode, Opcode::FPToSI);
921    }
922
923    #[test]
924    fn a_nan_is_left_alone() {
925        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
926        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
927        let value = build.fconst(Type::float(Float::F64), 0x7ff8_0000_0000_0000);
928        let out = build.unary(Opcode::FPToSI, value, Type::int(32));
929        build.ret(&[out]);
930        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
931    }
932
933    #[test]
934    fn a_constant_is_read_in_the_format_its_own_type_gives_it() {
935        // The same hundred and twenty eight bits, which are an x87 three and an `f128` far too
936        // small to be anything but zero once it has been truncated.
937        let bits = super::Float::parse("3.0", Format::X87Extended).expect("a number").0.to_bits();
938        for (float, expected) in [(Float::F80, 3_i128), (Float::F128, 0)] {
939            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
940            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
941            let value = build.fconst(Type::float(float), bits);
942            let out = build.unary(Opcode::FPToSI, value, Type::int(32));
943            build.ret(&[out]);
944            assert!(fold(&mut func), "{float}");
945            assert_eq!(value_of(&func, out, Type::int(32)), Some(expected), "{float}");
946        }
947    }
948
949    #[test]
950    fn a_conversion_of_something_that_is_not_a_constant_is_left_alone() {
951        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
952        let param = func.append_param(block, Type::float(Float::F64));
953        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
954        let out = build.unary(Opcode::FPToSI, param, Type::int(32));
955        build.ret(&[out]);
956        assert!(!fold(&mut func));
957    }
958
959    #[test]
960    fn a_divide_is_not_folded_even_when_both_operands_are_constants() {
961        for opcode in [Opcode::SDiv, Opcode::UDiv, Opcode::SRem, Opcode::URem] {
962            let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
963            let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
964            let lhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), 42);
965            let rhs = build.iconst(Type::int(64), 7);
966            let out = build.binary(opcode, lhs, rhs, Flags::NONE);
967            build.ret(&[out]);
968            assert!(!fold(&mut func), "{opcode:?}");
969        }
970    }
971
972    #[test]
973    fn folding_leaves_the_function_something_the_verifier_accepts() {
974        let mut names = Interner::new();
975        let name = names.intern("f");
976        let mut func = Func::new(name, Signature::new().with_returns(&[Type::int(64)]));
977        let block = func.create_block();
978        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
979        let narrow = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 7);
980        let wide = build.unary(Opcode::SExt, narrow, Type::int(64));
981        build.ret(&[wide]);
982        assert!(fold(&mut func));
983        let target = TargetInfo::new(Triple::new(Arch::X86_64, Os::Linux, Env::Gnu));
984        let module_name = names.intern("m");
985        let mut module = Module::new(module_name, &target);
986        module.add_func(func);
987        rucc_ir::verify(&module, &names).expect("folding does not break the IR");
988    }
989
990    #[test]
991    fn fuel_stops_the_transformation_and_not_the_walk() {
992        let build_two = |func: &mut Func, block: Block| {
993            let mut build = Builder::new(func, block);
994            let a = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 7);
995            let wide_a = build.unary(Opcode::SExt, a, Type::int(64));
996            let b = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 9);
997            let wide_b = build.unary(Opcode::SExt, b, Type::int(64));
998            let sum = build.binary(Opcode::Add, wide_a, wide_b, Flags::NONE);
999            build.ret(&[sum]);
1000            (wide_a, wide_b)
1001        };
1002
1003        let (_, mut none, block) = blank();
1004        let (first, _) = build_two(&mut none, block);
1005        let stats =
1006            Fold.run(&mut none, &mut crate::machine::fixtures::analyses(), &mut Fuel::of(0));
1007        assert!(!stats.changed());
1008        assert_eq!(none[out_inst(&none, first)].opcode, Opcode::SExt);
1009        // Both of them looked at and neither of them folded, which is the count a bisection is
1010        // reading: how many sites are left past where the fuel ran out.
1011        assert_eq!(stats.count(Kind::Missed, super::NO_FUEL), 2);
1012
1013        let (_, mut one, block) = blank();
1014        let (first, second) = build_two(&mut one, block);
1015        let mut fuel = Fuel::of(1);
1016        let stats = Fold.run(&mut one, &mut crate::machine::fixtures::analyses(), &mut fuel);
1017        assert!(stats.changed());
1018        assert_eq!(fuel.spent(), 1);
1019        assert_eq!(stats.count(Kind::Optimized, super::FOLDED), 1);
1020        assert_eq!(stats.count(Kind::Missed, super::NO_FUEL), 1);
1021        assert_eq!(one[out_inst(&one, first)].opcode, Opcode::IConst);
1022        assert_eq!(one[out_inst(&one, second)].opcode, Opcode::SExt);
1023    }
1024
1025    #[test]
1026    fn folding_one_operation_uncovers_the_next() {
1027        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
1028        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
1029        let a = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 7);
1030        let wide = build.unary(Opcode::SExt, a, Type::int(64));
1031        let b = build.iconst(Type::int(64), 9);
1032        let sum = build.binary(Opcode::Add, wide, b, Flags::NONE);
1033        build.ret(&[sum]);
1034        assert!(fold(&mut func));
1035        // One walk in order is enough for this shape, because a constant is written before it
1036        // is used and the walk is in the same order.
1037        assert_eq!(value_of(&func, sum, Type::int(64)), Some(16));
1038    }
1039
1040    #[test]
1041    fn a_constant_is_left_where_it_is_and_folding_it_again_changes_nothing() {
1042        let (_, mut func, block) = blank();
1043        let mut build = Builder::new(&mut func, block);
1044        let a = build.iconst(Type::int(32), 7);
1045        let wide = build.unary(Opcode::SExt, a, Type::int(64));
1046        build.ret(&[wide]);
1047        assert!(fold(&mut func));
1048        assert!(!fold(&mut func), "a second run found something to do");
1049    }
1050
1051    /// The instruction that defines a value, which every value in these tests has.
1052    fn out_inst(func: &Func, value: Value) -> rucc_ir::Inst {
1053        match func[value].def {
1054            rucc_ir::Def::Result { inst, .. } => inst,
1055            rucc_ir::Def::Param { .. } => panic!("a parameter has no instruction"),
1056        }
1057    }
1058}