rucc_codegen/split.rs
1//! Splitting critical edges, so that every edge that carries values has somewhere to put them.
2//!
3//! Design: `spec/10-backend.md` section 10.4.
4//!
5//! An edge carries values when the block it goes to takes parameters, and giving a parameter its
6//! value is a move. The move has to happen on the edge and not before it or after it, because
7//! before it is a block that goes somewhere else too and after it is a block that is arrived at
8//! from somewhere else too, and in either case the move would run on a path it was not written
9//! for. An edge out of a block with one successor can put its moves at the end of that block,
10//! since every path through it takes the edge. An edge into a block with one predecessor can put
11//! them at the start of that block, for the same reason the other way round. An edge that is
12//! neither, which is what a critical edge is, has neither place, and the allocator says so:
13//! `rucc_regalloc` asserts that it never sees one.
14//!
15//! So one is turned into two. A block with nothing in it goes on the edge, the arguments move on
16//! to the second half, and both halves are now uncritical: the first goes to a block with one
17//! predecessor and the second leaves a block with one successor. Which of the two the moves end
18//! up in is the allocator's answer and not this one's, and either is correct.
19//!
20//! # What it leaves behind
21//!
22//! An empty block, which is a jump to the next thing unless the layout puts it where it falls
23//! through. That is a cost, and it is why an edge with nothing to carry is left alone: there are
24//! no moves to find a place for, so splitting it would buy a jump and nothing else.
25//!
26//! # The other edge with nowhere to put a move
27//!
28//! A computed `goto` leaves its block through a register, and the moves an edge out of it carries
29//! would have to be written somewhere the jump has already gone past. So there is a second pass
30//! here, [`indirect`], which takes the values off those edges and puts them in a block of their
31//! own in front of each label. It runs first, and what it leaves behind is edges the splitting
32//! below then has nothing to do about.
33//!
34//! [`pads`] is here for the same reason and not for a reason of its own: the blocks those labels
35//! begin at are addresses an indirect branch arrives at, and a machine that checks the forward edge
36//! wants a landing pad at every one of them. Which block an address names is settled by the pass
37//! above, so the pad is written after it and not where the prologue's own pad is written.
38
39use rucc_base::Interner;
40use rucc_base::hash::Map;
41use rucc_mir as mir;
42use rucc_target::{BranchInsts, FrameInsts, RegClass};
43
44/// Splits every critical edge that carries values, and gives back how many it split.
45///
46/// Run after lowering and before allocation. Running it twice is running it once, because the
47/// blocks it adds have one successor each and are never the source of a critical edge.
48pub fn critical(func: &mut mir::Func) -> usize {
49 let preds = preds(func);
50 let blocks: Vec<mir::Block> = func.blocks().collect();
51 let mut split = 0;
52 for block in blocks {
53 if func[block].succs.len() < 2 {
54 continue;
55 }
56 for index in 0..func[block].succs.len() {
57 let call = func[block].succs[index].clone();
58 if call.args.is_empty() || preds[call.block.index()] < 2 {
59 continue;
60 }
61 // The new block is at the end of the layout, which is where a block that is a jump
62 // and nothing else does the least harm before the layout pass has an opinion.
63 //
64 // It runs exactly as often as the edge it sits on is taken, and both halves of that
65 // edge are now that edge, which is why the weight is copied onto all three rather
66 // than left at what a block nobody told anything runs. A block on a cold edge that
67 // claimed to run once per call would be one the layout put in the middle of the hot
68 // path.
69 let weight = call.weight;
70 let half = func.create_block();
71 func.set_weight(half, weight);
72 *func.succs_mut(half) = vec![call];
73 func.succs_mut(block)[index] = mir::BlockCall::to(half).taken(weight);
74 split += 1;
75 }
76 }
77 split
78}
79
80/// Takes the values off every edge out of a computed `goto`, and gives back how many blocks it
81/// made to hold them.
82///
83/// Run after lowering and before [`critical`], which then sees edges with nothing on them and
84/// leaves them alone. Running it twice is running it once, for the reason the splitting above is:
85/// the blocks it adds end in a jump rather than in a branch through a register.
86///
87/// # What is wrong with the edge it takes the values off
88///
89/// Every other edge in the function is out of a block whose last instruction the layout writes, so
90/// an edge that is the only way out of its block can put its moves at the end of that block and
91/// they land in front of the jump. A block that leaves through a register already ends in the jump
92/// when the allocator runs, because where it goes is a value and a value is something selection
93/// reads rather than something the layout knows. Moves at the end of that block would be written
94/// after the jump, where nothing runs them, and moves in front of it would be written across the
95/// register the jump reads, which the allocator believes is dead from the jump onwards and is free
96/// to hand to one of the moves.
97///
98/// So the moves go somewhere else. Each label an indirect branch reaches gets a block in front of
99/// it that carries the values, the branch goes to that block with nothing on the edge, and the
100/// address the `&&label` produces is the address of that block rather than of the label's own. The
101/// new block is arrived at one way and leaves one way, so its own edge has both of the places the
102/// splitting above talks about and the allocator is content.
103///
104/// # One label, one address, and two branches that disagree
105///
106/// A label has one address, so two computed `goto`s that reach it both arrive at whatever block
107/// that address names, and the values they carry are not the same values. One block in front of
108/// the label cannot move two different sets of registers.
109///
110/// So they are made to agree first. Each parameter of the label gets a register of its own, every
111/// branch writes that register in front of its jump, and the block in front of the label carries
112/// those registers and nothing else. That is what gcc does about the same problem, which it calls
113/// coalescing across an abnormal edge, done here rather than while the values are still the
114/// optimizer's.
115///
116/// Writing them in front of the jump is safe, which is not obvious, since a branch that goes five
117/// ways writes the registers of one of those ways on the path to all five. What makes it safe is
118/// that nothing reads those registers except the block in front of the label, and the only way to
119/// reach that block is an edge out of a branch, which writes them on the way. So a value written
120/// here and not used is a value overwritten before anything looks, whichever way the jump went.
121///
122/// # One register for one value, and not one for every place it is given to
123///
124/// That safety is also what makes the cost of it worth watching. A branch writes the registers of
125/// every label it can reach, so a register for every parameter of every label is a whole table's
126/// worth of moves in front of every jump in the function, and a dispatch table is a branch that
127/// reaches hundreds of labels. An interpreter hands each of them whatever its loop had in hand at
128/// the jump, which is the same few values over and over, so a register for each place one of them
129/// lands means those values written a hundred times over before every instruction the interpreter
130/// runs. That is not a small constant. It is what makes an interpreter built this way ten times
131/// slower than the same interpreter built with a `switch` instead of the computed `goto`.
132///
133/// So the register belongs to the value rather than to the place. Two parameters are given one
134/// register when they are drawn from the same class and every branch in the function gives them
135/// the same register, which is exactly when one register can stand for both, and a branch writes
136/// each register it has to write once however many labels asked for it. A dispatch table where
137/// every label wants the instruction pointer writes the instruction pointer once. A label
138/// something else reaches, or a label given something no other label is given, keeps a register of
139/// its own, and a branch that gives one label nothing shares nothing with it, since a register
140/// that branch never wrote is not one the label can be given.
141///
142/// # Panics
143///
144/// Panics on a class of register the machine named no move for, which is a function carrying a
145/// value of a kind the target never said how to copy, and on a branch that has lost the terminator
146/// it was found by, which nothing between the finding and the use of it can do. Both are a target
147/// description or a function that was built wrongly, and both are worth finding here rather than as
148/// a value that arrives somewhere it was never written.
149pub fn indirect(
150 func: &mut mir::Func,
151 branch: &BranchInsts,
152 frame: &FrameInsts,
153 names: &mut Interner,
154) -> usize {
155 let jump = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern(&format!("{}{}", branch.prefix, branch.indirect)));
156 let branches: Vec<mir::Block> = func
157 .blocks()
158 .filter(|&block| func.terminator(block).is_some_and(|last| func[last].opcode == jump))
159 .collect();
160 // Nothing at all in almost every function, and the walk at the bottom is over every instruction
161 // in it, so the answer is arrived at here rather than paid for everywhere.
162 if branches.is_empty() {
163 return 0;
164 }
165 // In the order the branches name them rather than in whatever order a hash gives, so that two
166 // runs of the compiler over one program write the same blocks.
167 let mut targets: Vec<mir::Block> = Vec::new();
168 for &block in &branches {
169 for call in &func[block].succs {
170 if !call.args.is_empty() && !targets.contains(&call.block) {
171 targets.push(call.block);
172 }
173 }
174 }
175
176 // One register per thing a branch has to give, rather than one per place it is given to. The
177 // key is what every branch gives that parameter, so two parameters given the same register by
178 // the same branches are given it in one register and a branch writes that register once.
179 let mut homes: Map<Given, mir::Reg> = Map::default();
180 // What each branch writes in front of its jump, in the order it was first asked for, and never
181 // the same register twice. Two parameters that share a register are given it by the one move.
182 let mut writes: Vec<Vec<(mir::Reg, mir::Reg, RegClass)>> = vec![Vec::new(); branches.len()];
183 let mut entries: Map<mir::Block, mir::Block> = Map::default();
184
185 for target in targets {
186 let params = func[target].params.clone();
187 let given = given(func, &branches, target);
188 let mut carried: Vec<mir::Reg> = Vec::new();
189 for (index, param) in params.iter().enumerate() {
190 let key: Given = (
191 param.class,
192 given.iter().map(|edges| edges.iter().map(|args| args[index]).collect()).collect(),
193 );
194 let home = match homes.get(&key) {
195 Some(&home) => home,
196 None => {
197 // As narrow as the widest thing it is given, since what it holds is one of
198 // them, and the whole register when any of them is.
199 let widths = key.1.iter().flatten().map(|&arg| func.width(arg));
200 let width =
201 widths.collect::<Option<Vec<u8>>>().and_then(|all| all.into_iter().max());
202 let home = func.new_vreg(param.class);
203 func.set_width(home, width.map_or(0, u32::from));
204 homes.insert(key, home);
205 home
206 }
207 };
208 carried.push(home);
209 for (branch, edges) in given.iter().enumerate() {
210 for args in edges {
211 if !writes[branch].iter().any(|&(written, _, _)| written == home) {
212 writes[branch].push((home, args[index], param.class));
213 }
214 }
215 }
216 }
217 let entry = func.create_block();
218 let mut total = mir::Weight::NEVER;
219 for &block in &branches {
220 for index in 0..func[block].succs.len() {
221 if func[block].succs[index].block != target {
222 continue;
223 }
224 // The block in front of the label runs as often as every branch that reaches it,
225 // which is the same sum the weight of a block with that many edges into it would
226 // be.
227 let weight = func[block].succs[index].weight;
228 total = mir::Weight::parts(total.raw().saturating_add(weight.raw()));
229 func.succs_mut(block)[index] = mir::BlockCall::to(entry).taken(weight);
230 }
231 }
232 func.set_weight(entry, total);
233 *func.succs_mut(entry) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(target, carried).taken(total)];
234 entries.insert(target, entry);
235 }
236
237 // And the moves themselves, once every label has asked for what it wants, since what one label
238 // asks for is what another may already have asked the same branch for.
239 for (branch, moves) in branches.iter().zip(&writes) {
240 let last = func.terminator(*branch).expect("a block that ends in a jump");
241 for &(home, arg, class) in moves {
242 let name = frame.moves(class).expect("a class this machine can move").mov;
243 let opcode = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern(&format!("{}{name}", frame.prefix)));
244 let inst = func.build_loose(opcode).def(home, class).uses(arg, class).finish();
245 func.insert_before(last, inst);
246 }
247 }
248
249 // And the addresses, which is the half of this that is not about edges. Every `&&label` in the
250 // function names a block, and a label with a block in front of it now begins at that block, so
251 // an address left pointing at the label's own block would be a jump past the moves.
252 let mut addresses: Vec<mir::MemRef> = Vec::new();
253 for block in func.blocks() {
254 for inst in func.insts(block) {
255 if let Some(mem) = func[inst].mem {
256 addresses.push(mem);
257 }
258 }
259 }
260 for mem in addresses {
261 if let Some(named) = func[mem].block {
262 if let Some(&entry) = entries.get(&named) {
263 func[mem].block = Some(entry);
264 }
265 }
266 }
267 // And the names, for the same reason. A block an image points at is one a `goto *p` arrives at,
268 // so a name left on the label's own block would be an address in a table that skips the moves,
269 // which is the one way into the block that would not have made them.
270 for (block, _) in &mut func.labels {
271 if let Some(&entry) = entries.get(block) {
272 *block = entry;
273 }
274 }
275 entries.len()
276}
277
278/// Puts a landing pad at the front of every block whose address is taken, and gives back how many
279/// it wrote.
280///
281/// Run after [`indirect`], because the block an address names is not settled until that has moved
282/// the addresses on to the blocks it made, and only when the command line asked for the forward
283/// edge to be checked. Nothing is written otherwise, which is why the name comes in as an option
284/// and why a target with no such instruction is a target this does nothing on.
285///
286/// The pad a prologue opens with is written elsewhere, in `crate::finish`, because the address it
287/// makes reachable is the address of the function rather than a place inside it. These are the
288/// other addresses an indirect branch may arrive at, and a machine that checks the forward edge
289/// faults on one that has no pad, so a computed `goto` compiled without this would be a program
290/// that ran everywhere except on the hardware the flag was turned on for.
291pub fn pads(
292 func: &mut mir::Func,
293 frame: &FrameInsts,
294 landing: Option<&'static str>,
295 names: &mut Interner,
296) -> usize {
297 let Some(name) = landing else { return 0 };
298 let opcode = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern(&format!("{}{name}", frame.prefix)));
299 let mut addressed: Vec<mir::Block> = Vec::new();
300 for block in func.blocks() {
301 for inst in func.insts(block) {
302 if let Some(mem) = func[inst].mem {
303 if let Some(named) = func[mem].block {
304 if !addressed.contains(&named) {
305 addressed.push(named);
306 }
307 }
308 }
309 }
310 }
311 // And every arm of a jump table, which an indirect jump arrives at the same way.
312 for table in &func.tables {
313 let Some(jump) = func.block_of(table.jump) else { continue };
314 for &cell in &table.cells {
315 let named = func[jump].succs[cell as usize].block;
316 if !addressed.contains(&named) {
317 addressed.push(named);
318 }
319 }
320 }
321 for &block in &addressed {
322 let inst = func.build_loose(opcode).finish();
323 func.prepend_inst(block, inst);
324 }
325 addressed.len()
326}
327
328/// What decides whether two parameters can be given their value in one register: the class the
329/// parameter is drawn from, and the register every branch in the function gives it, in the order
330/// the branches are in and with one entry per edge inside that. A branch that does not reach the
331/// label gives nothing, which is a length of zero and is as much a part of the answer as a
332/// register is, since sharing with a parameter a branch never gives anything to would be reading a
333/// register that branch never wrote.
334type Given = (RegClass, Vec<Vec<mir::Reg>>);
335
336/// What each branch gives that label, edge by edge.
337///
338/// One entry per branch and in the branches' own order, since a label two branches reach and a
339/// label one branch reaches twice are not given the same thing. A branch is allowed to reach one
340/// label twice, which a table with the same label in two of its cells is, so what a branch gives
341/// is a list of what it gives rather than one set of registers.
342fn given(func: &mir::Func, branches: &[mir::Block], target: mir::Block) -> Vec<Vec<Vec<mir::Reg>>> {
343 branches
344 .iter()
345 .map(|&block| {
346 func[block]
347 .succs
348 .iter()
349 .filter(|call| call.block == target)
350 .map(|call| call.args.clone())
351 .collect()
352 })
353 .collect()
354}
355
356/// How many edges arrive at each block, counted by index rather than in layout order so that a
357/// block added while splitting can be looked up in the same table.
358fn preds(func: &mir::Func) -> Vec<usize> {
359 let mut counts = vec![0; func.block_count()];
360 for block in func.blocks() {
361 for call in &func[block].succs {
362 counts[call.block.index()] += 1;
363 }
364 }
365 counts
366}
367
368#[cfg(test)]
369mod tests {
370 use rucc_base::Interner;
371 use rucc_target::x86_64::{BRANCH, FRAME, GPR, REGS};
372
373 use super::*;
374
375 /// A diamond: one block that goes two ways and one block both ways arrive at, with as many
376 /// parameters on the block they arrive at as the test asks for.
377 fn diamond(params: usize) -> (Interner, mir::Func, [mir::Block; 4]) {
378 let mut names = Interner::new();
379 let mut func = mir::Func::new(names.intern("f"));
380 let head = func.create_block();
381 let left = func.create_block();
382 let right = func.create_block();
383 let join = func.create_block();
384 // The values arrive in the head, so that they have somewhere to be defined and the
385 // printer has a name for them. Nothing here runs an allocator, which is the one thing
386 // that would object to a first block with parameters.
387 let args: Vec<mir::Reg> = (0..params).map(|_| func.append_param(head, GPR)).collect();
388 for _ in 0..params {
389 func.append_param(join, GPR);
390 }
391 *func.succs_mut(head) = vec![mir::BlockCall::to(left), mir::BlockCall::to(right)];
392 *func.succs_mut(left) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(join, args.clone())];
393 *func.succs_mut(right) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(join, args)];
394 (names, func, [head, left, right, join])
395 }
396
397 /// Where each block goes, which is the whole of what this changes.
398 fn edges(func: &mir::Func) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
399 func.blocks()
400 .map(|block| func[block].succs.iter().map(|call| call.block.index()).collect())
401 .collect()
402 }
403
404 #[test]
405 fn an_edge_that_is_the_only_way_out_is_left_alone() {
406 let (_, mut func, _) = diamond(1);
407 // The two edges into the join carry a value each and neither is critical, because the
408 // block each leaves goes nowhere else.
409 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
410 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![1, 2], vec![3], vec![3], vec![]]);
411 }
412
413 #[test]
414 fn a_critical_edge_carrying_a_value_is_split_in_two() {
415 let (_, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(1);
416 // Now the head goes straight to the join as well, so both of its arms are critical: it
417 // has two ways out and the join has three ways in.
418 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
419 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(join, vec![arg]));
420 func.succs_mut(head).swap(1, 2);
421
422 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 1);
423 assert_eq!(
424 edges(&func),
425 // The head's second arm is the new block and the new block goes to the join. The
426 // other two arms are untouched, because each goes to a block with one way in.
427 vec![vec![1, 4, 2], vec![3], vec![3], vec![], vec![3]]
428 );
429 }
430
431 #[test]
432 fn a_critical_edge_carrying_nothing_is_left_alone() {
433 let (_, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(0);
434 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::to(join));
435
436 // Critical and not split, because there is no move to find a place for and a block that
437 // is a jump and nothing else is worth more than nothing.
438 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
439 }
440
441 #[test]
442 fn the_arguments_move_on_to_the_half_that_arrives() {
443 let (names, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(1);
444 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
445 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(join, vec![arg]));
446
447 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 1);
448 // What the first half carries is nothing, since the block it goes to asks for nothing,
449 // and what the second half carries is what the whole edge used to.
450 let half = func.blocks().last().expect("the block the split added");
451 assert_eq!(func[head].succs[2].args, Vec::new());
452 assert_eq!(func[half].succs[0].args, vec![arg]);
453 assert_eq!(
454 mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S),
455 "mfunc @f {\nblock0(%0:gpr, %1:gpr):\n block1, block2, block4\n\n\
456 block1:\n block3(%0)\n\nblock2:\n block3(%0)\n\n\
457 block3(%2:gpr):\n\nblock4:\n block3(%1)\n}\n"
458 );
459 }
460
461 #[test]
462 fn splitting_twice_is_splitting_once() {
463 let (_, mut func, [head, _, _, join]) = diamond(1);
464 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
465 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(join, vec![arg]));
466
467 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 1);
468 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
469 }
470
471 /// A function with one label whose address is taken and as many blocks leaving through that
472 /// address as the test asks for, each carrying as many values to the label as it asks for.
473 fn computed(branches: usize, params: usize) -> (Interner, mir::Func) {
474 let mut names = Interner::new();
475 let mut func = mir::Func::new(names.intern("f"));
476 let head = func.create_block();
477 let label = func.create_block();
478 for _ in 0..params {
479 func.append_param(label, GPR);
480 }
481 let lea = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.lea_64"));
482 let jump = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.jmp_reg"));
483 for _ in 0..branches {
484 // Every branch works the address out for itself, which is what a program that takes
485 // the address of a label twice looks like once the values are in registers.
486 let args: Vec<mir::Reg> = (0..params).map(|_| func.append_param(head, GPR)).collect();
487 let address = func.new_vreg(GPR);
488 let at = if branches == 1 { head } else { func.create_block() };
489 func.build(at, lea).def(address, GPR).mem(mir::Mem::block(label)).finish();
490 func.build(at, jump).operand(mir::Operand::read(address, GPR)).finish();
491 *func.succs_mut(at) = vec![mir::BlockCall::with(label, args)];
492 }
493 (names, func)
494 }
495
496 /// Which block each address in the function names, in the order the instructions are in.
497 fn addressed(func: &mir::Func) -> Vec<usize> {
498 func.blocks()
499 .flat_map(|block| func.insts(block).collect::<Vec<_>>())
500 .filter_map(|inst| func[inst].mem)
501 .filter_map(|mem| func[mem].block)
502 .map(mir::Block::index)
503 .collect()
504 }
505
506 #[test]
507 fn the_values_a_computed_goto_carries_move_into_a_block_in_front_of_the_label() {
508 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 1);
509 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 1);
510
511 // The branch goes to the new block carrying nothing, and the new block carries the value
512 // the branch used to. The address the `lea` works out is the new block's as well, since
513 // arriving at the label without going through the new block is arriving without the value.
514 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![2], vec![], vec![1]]);
515 assert_eq!(func[mir::Block::new(0)].succs[0].args, Vec::new());
516 assert_eq!(addressed(&func), vec![2]);
517 }
518
519 #[test]
520 fn two_computed_gotos_that_reach_one_label_are_made_to_agree() {
521 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(2, 1);
522 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 1);
523
524 // One block in front of the label and not two, because the label has one address and both
525 // branches arrive at it. What makes that sound is the move each branch writes in front of
526 // its own jump, which puts its value in the register that block carries.
527 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![], vec![], vec![4], vec![4], vec![1]]);
528 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
529 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 2, "{text}");
530 // In front of the jump rather than behind it, since nothing behind a jump runs.
531 for line in text.lines().collect::<Vec<_>>().windows(2) {
532 if line[1].contains("x64.jmp_reg") {
533 assert!(line[0].contains("x64.mov_rr_64"), "{text}");
534 }
535 }
536 assert_eq!(addressed(&func), vec![4, 4]);
537 }
538
539 /// A function with one computed `goto` that reaches as many labels as the test asks for, each
540 /// given the one value the branch has in hand, which is the shape of a dispatch table.
541 fn table(labels: usize) -> (Interner, mir::Func, Vec<mir::Block>) {
542 let mut names = Interner::new();
543 let mut func = mir::Func::new(names.intern("f"));
544 let head = func.create_block();
545 let arg = func.append_param(head, GPR);
546 let lea = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.lea_64"));
547 let jump = mir::Opcode::new(names.intern("x64.jmp_reg"));
548 let mut targets = Vec::new();
549 for _ in 0..labels {
550 let label = func.create_block();
551 func.append_param(label, GPR);
552 targets.push(label);
553 func.succs_mut(head).push(mir::BlockCall::with(label, vec![arg]));
554 }
555 let address = func.new_vreg(GPR);
556 func.build(head, lea).def(address, GPR).mem(mir::Mem::block(targets[0])).finish();
557 func.build(head, jump).operand(mir::Operand::read(address, GPR)).finish();
558 (names, func, targets)
559 }
560
561 #[test]
562 fn labels_a_branch_gives_the_same_value_are_given_it_in_one_register() {
563 let (mut names, mut func, _) = table(8);
564 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 8);
565
566 // One move in front of the jump and not eight, because the eight labels are given the one
567 // value and it is now in the one register. Eight blocks were still made, since each label
568 // needs the block that moves that register on to its own parameter.
569 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
570 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 1, "{text}");
571 }
572
573 #[test]
574 fn a_label_given_something_else_keeps_a_register_of_its_own() {
575 let (mut names, mut func, targets) = table(8);
576 let head = mir::Block::new(0);
577 let other = func.append_param(head, GPR);
578 let last = func[head].succs.len() - 1;
579 func.succs_mut(head)[last] = mir::BlockCall::with(targets[7], vec![other]);
580
581 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 8);
582 // Two moves: one register for the seven labels given the same value, and one for the label
583 // given the other. Sharing is about what a label is given and not about how many there are.
584 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
585 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 2, "{text}");
586 }
587
588 #[test]
589 fn labels_that_take_different_numbers_of_values_still_share_the_ones_they_agree_on() {
590 let (mut names, mut func, targets) = table(8);
591 let head = mir::Block::new(0);
592 let arg = func[head].params[0].reg;
593 let other = func.append_param(head, GPR);
594 // The last label takes a second value, which is what an interpreter looks like: each of
595 // its labels uses what it needs and no two of them need quite the same list.
596 func.append_param(targets[7], GPR);
597 let last = func[head].succs.len() - 1;
598 func.succs_mut(head)[last] = mir::BlockCall::with(targets[7], vec![arg, other]);
599
600 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 8);
601 // Two moves, not nine. The first parameter of the long label is given what the other seven
602 // are given, so it takes the same register, and only the value nothing else is given needs
603 // one of its own.
604 let text = mir::print_func(&func, &names, ®S);
605 assert_eq!(text.matches("x64.mov_rr_64").count(), 2, "{text}");
606 }
607
608 #[test]
609 fn an_edge_out_of_a_computed_goto_that_carries_nothing_is_left_alone() {
610 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 0);
611
612 // No values to carry, so no block to carry them, and the address stays the label's own.
613 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 0);
614 assert_eq!(addressed(&func), vec![1]);
615 }
616
617 #[test]
618 fn a_function_with_no_computed_goto_in_it_is_left_alone() {
619 let (mut names, mut func, _) = diamond(1);
620 assert_eq!(indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names), 0);
621 assert_eq!(edges(&func), vec![vec![1, 2], vec![3], vec![3], vec![]]);
622 }
623
624 #[test]
625 fn what_it_leaves_is_nothing_for_the_splitting_below_to_do() {
626 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(2, 1);
627 indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names);
628 // The edges out of the branches carry nothing now, and the edges out of the blocks it
629 // added are the only way out of those blocks, so neither kind is critical.
630 assert_eq!(critical(&mut func), 0);
631 }
632
633 /// The first instruction of each block, by opcode, and an empty string for a block with
634 /// nothing in it.
635 fn opens(func: &mir::Func, names: &Interner) -> Vec<String> {
636 func.blocks()
637 .map(|block| match func.insts(block).next() {
638 Some(inst) => names.resolve(func[inst].opcode.name()).to_owned(),
639 None => String::new(),
640 })
641 .collect()
642 }
643
644 #[test]
645 fn the_block_a_label_begins_at_gets_a_landing_pad_when_the_forward_edge_is_checked() {
646 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(2, 1);
647 indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names);
648
649 // One pad, at the block in front of the label, because that is the block both addresses
650 // name once the values have been moved on to it. The label's own block is arrived at by an
651 // ordinary edge from there and wants nothing.
652 assert_eq!(pads(&mut func, &FRAME, FRAME.landing, &mut names), 1);
653 assert_eq!(opens(&func, &names), ["", "", "x64.lea_64", "x64.lea_64", "x64.endbr64"]);
654 }
655
656 #[test]
657 fn a_label_with_no_block_in_front_of_it_gets_the_pad_itself() {
658 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 0);
659 indirect(&mut func, &BRANCH, &FRAME, &mut names);
660
661 // Nothing was moved on to anything, so the address still names the label and the pad goes
662 // where the address goes.
663 assert_eq!(pads(&mut func, &FRAME, FRAME.landing, &mut names), 1);
664 assert_eq!(opens(&func, &names), ["x64.lea_64", "x64.endbr64"]);
665 }
666
667 #[test]
668 fn nothing_is_written_when_the_forward_edge_is_not_checked() {
669 let (mut names, mut func) = computed(1, 0);
670 assert_eq!(pads(&mut func, &FRAME, None, &mut names), 0);
671 assert_eq!(opens(&func, &names), ["x64.lea_64", ""]);
672 }
673}