Expand description
§Predicated Recursive Descent
aka pred recdec
It is VERY HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that you use the mimalloc crate (or some other high-performance memory allocator) if you use this library:
use mimalloc::MiMalloc;
#[global_allocator]
static GLOBAL: MiMalloc = MiMalloc;You want:
This library provides a way to write and run BNF grammars with annotations that make them behave like a handwritten recursive descent parser.
The structure of the BNF corresponds to the structure of the resulting ASTs. Tokenization is handled automatically; you do not need to write a lexical grammar. The tokenizer handles comments, whitespace, maximal munch, and even regex tests. Unless you’re trying to do something silly like how Lua uses context-sensitive long brackets for comments, that’s all you need.
The resulting parser is scannerful but tolerant of soft keywords. It performs no memoization or backtracking. Impure hooks are safe. There’s no lookahead generation or guessing: the parser only does exactly what you specify in the BNF, in order.
This is strong enough to parse C. Yes, the language with the super horrible grammar that needs arbitrary lookahead and state munging to parse correctly.
This is not a PEG or packrat thing.
Performance: varies between 50% and 400% slower than a native machine code handwritten parser. For more complex grammars, the performance loss is less. Totally usable!
Simple example (totally not lisp), capable of parsing the input (a b (q x)kfwaiei i 9 (af0f1a) () () ):
S ::= @peek(0, "(") parenexpr
parenexpr ::=
@peek(1, ")") "(" ")"
| "(" itemlist ")"
itemlist ::=
@peek(0, ")") #end of list
| item $become itemlist
item ::=
@peek(0, "(") parenexpr
| @auto r`[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*|[0-9\.]*`r§Example usage
let mut g = bnf_to_grammar(&grammar_source).unwrap();
let tokens = tokenize(&mut g, &test_source);
let tokens = tokens.unwrap();
use std::rc::Rc;
let ast = parse(&g,
"S", // Name of your root-most rule
&tokens[..],
Rc::new(<_>::default()), // guards (see test in `src/c.rs` for a detailed usage example)
Rc::new(<_>::default()) // hooks (same)
);
if let Ok(ast) = &ast
{
print_ast_pred_recdec(ast, &g.string_cache_inv, 0);
}
drop(ast.unwrap());§BNF Extensions
Mini glossary: nonterminal = “call of another rule”, terminal = “immediate match of a token’s contents”.
Common EBNF syntax like [] or ()? is not supported. Don’t worry, you can make flat lists just fine.
Extensions from pure BNF are:
\ - End-of-line escaping with \, so you can write multiline regexes.
# - Comments until the end of the line, outside of strings/regexes.
"... - Terms starting with " are inline strings. They register with the tokenizer and check the entire body of a token. (Strings are interned, so this is O(1).)
Terms starting with r`..., R`..., or A`... are inline regexes:
r`...`rregisters with the tokenizer and does a full token match (i.e. it’s given an implicit trailing\zduring token matching).R`...`rDOES NOT register with the tokenizer, but does a full token match (i.e. it’s given an implicit trailing\z). This is provided as an optimization: sometimes you want to combine tokenizer regexes into a single regex for performance reasons, which should be done manually.A`...`rDOES NOT register with the tokenizer, and only checks against the start of the token. This is only provided as an optimization:R``ris strictly more powerful.
Regex results are cached, so checking them is amortized O(1).
Terms beginning with ! currently only have one kind:
!hook, e.g.!hook(fix_infix_expr), are calls to user-provided code. This is allow to be impure, e.g. management of typedef symbol tables.
Terms beginning with @ are guards/predicates. They determine, at the start of a given alternation/production, whether it is valid. If true, that production is taken, and none of the others will be attempted (at this location). Remember, there’s no backtracking or magic.
@peek(N, STRING)- Checks if, relative to the parse position, the given token contains the given text.@peekr(N, REGEX)- Same, but only for regexes.@auto item- Desugars to@peek(0, item) itemor@peekr(0, item) itemautomatically.@guard(name)- Calls user-provided code to determine if the production is accepted.@recover- Pseudo-guard, is never attempted. Instead, it tells the associated grammar rule that if it fails, it’s allowed to recover (into a poisoned state) by seeking for a particular set of tokens.@recover_before- Same, but stops right before accepting any seek token instead of consuming it.
Terms starting with $ are directives:
$become nonterminalperforms a tail call, keeping the current AST node name. This can be used to build lists without smashing the stack.$become_as nonterminalperforms a tail call, replacing the current AST node’s name with that of the target.$anymatches and includes any one token as a terminal.$prunedspecifies that this particular production doesn’t generate AST nodes for bare terminals. This is useful for reducing AST bloat. For example,@peek(1, ")") "(" ")" $prunedis a non-empty production but produces zero AST nodes.- TODO:
$hoist,$drop,$dropifempty,$rename
You’ll note that there’s no “negative rule-match-check predicate” extension (e.g. no “parse A, but only if it doesn’t also parse B”). This is by design. Rule-level negation is way too powerful, and requires an extremely sophisticated parser generator (e.g. packrat) to handle properly. For any reasonably simple implementation, it would be incompatible with impure hooks. __RESERVED_WORDS, described below, is the only exception, because it’s easy to define in a sane way.
For negative token predicates (peeks), you can refactor the grammar slightly, or if it’s a particularly complicated peek, write a custom guard. So this isn’t a limitation.
§Magic pseudo-rules
The following magic pseudo rule names are available (e.g. __COMMENTS ::= //):
__BRACKET_PAIRSe.g.::= ( ) | { }- Tell the tokenizer to pair-up these tokens with each other so that hooks can skip over their contents in O(1) time.__COMMENTSe.g.::= "//" | "#"– Tell the tokenizer that this is a kind of single-line comment.__COMMENT_PAIRSe.g.::= /* */- Tell the tokenizer that this is a kind of pair-based comment.__COMMENT_PAIRS_NESTED- Same, but nesting, like in Rust.__COMMENT_REGEXES- Same, but formed as a regex. These are slower than the above, because the Rustregexcrate doesn’t have a JIT.__RESERVED_WORDS- e.g.::= auto break case- Specifies a list of token contents that are not allowed to be “accepted” by regex terminals liker`[a-zA-Z_]+`r