phantom_protocol/transport/path.rs
1//! Multi-path / connection migration state (Phase 4.2).
2//!
3//! Tracks the per-path lifecycle from "newly observed" through
4//! "validated" so the session can refuse to send application data over
5//! an unverified path. Each path is identified by the 1-byte
6//! `path_id` field in `PacketHeader` (Phase 3.3 / Phase 4.2 wire
7//! addition).
8//!
9//! ## Validation protocol
10//!
11//! When a peer arrives on a new (session_id, path_id) tuple — a fresh
12//! UDP source IP, a different transport leg, whatever — the receiver
13//! MUST NOT trust the path for application data until it has proven
14//! reachability by completing a challenge-response round-trip:
15//!
16//! 1. Receiver registers the new `path_id` (state: `Unvalidated`).
17//! 2. Receiver calls [`PathRegistry::issue_challenge`] to allocate a
18//! fresh 32-byte random challenge, stored under the `path_id`. The
19//! state transitions to `Validating`.
20//! 3. Receiver sends a `PATH_VALIDATION` flagged packet on the new
21//! path carrying the challenge bytes as its payload.
22//! 4. The legitimate peer echoes the same bytes back in a
23//! `PATH_VALIDATION` packet (the AEAD authentication guarantees
24//! only the legitimate peer who holds the session key can do this).
25//! 5. Receiver calls [`PathRegistry::verify_response`]. If the bytes
26//! match the stored challenge, the path transitions to `Validated`
27//! and may carry application data. A mismatch transitions to
28//! `Failed`.
29//!
30//! The cryptographic protection comes from the AEAD layer: a network
31//! attacker observing the wire cannot forge a `PATH_VALIDATION` packet
32//! with the right payload because they don't hold the session AEAD key.
33//! The challenge bytes themselves don't need to be secret — they exist
34//! to bind a specific path-validation attempt to a specific response.
35//!
36//! ## Use against migration
37//!
38//! When a peer's source IP changes mid-session (mobile handoff,
39//! LTE↔Wi-Fi switch, multi-path), the session must NOT silently
40//! accept packets on the new path — that would let an attacker hijack
41//! by spoofing the source IP. Issuing a challenge on the new path
42//! before accepting traffic forces the attacker to also hold the
43//! AEAD key, which they don't.
44
45use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicU32, AtomicU8, Ordering};
46use std::time::Instant;
47
48use dashmap::DashMap;
49use parking_lot::{Mutex, RwLock};
50use subtle::ConstantTimeEq;
51
52use crate::crypto::rng::{OsRng, RngProvider};
53
54/// Width of a path-validation challenge / response, in bytes.
55pub const PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN: usize = 32;
56
57/// Lifecycle state of a single path within a session.
58#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
59pub enum PathStateKind {
60 /// First seen but never sent / received a validation challenge.
61 /// Application data MUST NOT be sent on or accepted from this
62 /// path while in this state.
63 Unvalidated,
64 /// Validation challenge has been issued; awaiting a matching
65 /// response. Application data MUST NOT cross until `Validated`.
66 Validating,
67 /// Path has completed challenge-response. Application data is
68 /// allowed.
69 Validated,
70 /// Path validation failed (wrong response, timeout, etc.). Path
71 /// is permanently disabled within this session — the peer must
72 /// re-register from `Unvalidated`.
73 Failed,
74}
75
76/// Per-path bookkeeping. Lives inside [`PathRegistry`].
77pub struct PathState {
78 pub path_id: u8,
79 state: AtomicU8, // PathStateKind as u8
80 /// EMA-smoothed RTT estimate for this path, in milliseconds.
81 /// Updated by the scheduler / data pump as ACKs land.
82 pub rtt_ms: AtomicU32,
83 /// Smoothed loss percentage (0-100) for this path.
84 pub loss_pct: AtomicU8,
85 /// Wall-clock instant of the most recent packet observed on this
86 /// path. Used by the timeout sweep.
87 pub last_packet_seen: RwLock<Option<Instant>>,
88 /// 32-byte challenge associated with the in-flight validation
89 /// attempt. `None` outside `Validating`.
90 pending_challenge: Mutex<Option<[u8; PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN]>>,
91}
92
93impl PathState {
94 fn new(path_id: u8) -> Self {
95 Self {
96 path_id,
97 state: AtomicU8::new(PathStateKind::Unvalidated as u8),
98 rtt_ms: AtomicU32::new(0),
99 loss_pct: AtomicU8::new(0),
100 last_packet_seen: RwLock::new(None),
101 pending_challenge: Mutex::new(None),
102 }
103 }
104
105 pub fn state(&self) -> PathStateKind {
106 match self.state.load(Ordering::Acquire) {
107 0 => PathStateKind::Unvalidated,
108 1 => PathStateKind::Validating,
109 2 => PathStateKind::Validated,
110 3 => PathStateKind::Failed,
111 // Bit-rot insurance: never trust a malformed state byte.
112 _ => PathStateKind::Failed,
113 }
114 }
115
116 fn set_state(&self, new: PathStateKind) {
117 self.state.store(new as u8, Ordering::Release);
118 }
119
120 /// Mark this path as having just observed a packet. Updates the
121 /// `last_packet_seen` timestamp; cheap enough to call per-packet.
122 pub fn mark_seen(&self) {
123 *self.last_packet_seen.write() = Some(Instant::now());
124 }
125}
126
127/// Per-session collection of [`PathState`]s indexed by `path_id`.
128///
129/// Lock-free in the steady state (DashMap is lock-free for reads);
130/// per-path validation operations take only the per-path `Mutex` on
131/// the pending challenge, which is uncontended outside of the brief
132/// window of an active challenge round-trip.
133pub struct PathRegistry {
134 paths: DashMap<u8, PathState>,
135}
136
137/// Outcome of a [`PathRegistry::register`] call.
138#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
139pub enum RegistrationResult {
140 /// Path was newly created — caller should issue a challenge.
141 Created,
142 /// Path was already present. No state change.
143 AlreadyKnown,
144}
145
146impl Default for PathRegistry {
147 fn default() -> Self {
148 Self::new()
149 }
150}
151
152impl PathRegistry {
153 pub fn new() -> Self {
154 Self {
155 paths: DashMap::new(),
156 }
157 }
158
159 /// Register a new path id if it doesn't already exist. Returns
160 /// `Created` if this call created the entry — caller is the one
161 /// that should now issue a validation challenge.
162 pub fn register(&self, path_id: u8) -> RegistrationResult {
163 // DashMap::insert returns the previous value. We use entry
164 // semantics so we don't overwrite an existing PathState.
165 let mut created = false;
166 self.paths.entry(path_id).or_insert_with(|| {
167 created = true;
168 PathState::new(path_id)
169 });
170 if created {
171 RegistrationResult::Created
172 } else {
173 RegistrationResult::AlreadyKnown
174 }
175 }
176
177 /// Register a new path id directly in the `Validated` state, skipping
178 /// the challenge-response round trip. Used for the implicit
179 /// `path_id = 0` initialised at session establishment — that path
180 /// is the one the handshake itself traversed, so the AEAD setup
181 /// itself was already a stronger proof of reachability than any
182 /// PATH_CHALLENGE would be.
183 ///
184 /// Returns `Created` if this call created the entry. If the entry
185 /// already existed, its state is NOT modified — the caller must
186 /// explicitly drive a challenge-response if they want to change it.
187 pub fn register_validated(&self, path_id: u8) -> RegistrationResult {
188 let mut created = false;
189 self.paths.entry(path_id).or_insert_with(|| {
190 created = true;
191 let p = PathState::new(path_id);
192 p.set_state(PathStateKind::Validated);
193 p
194 });
195 if created {
196 RegistrationResult::Created
197 } else {
198 RegistrationResult::AlreadyKnown
199 }
200 }
201
202 /// Update `last_packet_seen` on the path. No-op for unknown paths.
203 pub fn mark_seen(&self, path_id: u8) {
204 if let Some(p) = self.paths.get(&path_id) {
205 p.mark_seen();
206 }
207 }
208
209 /// Allocate a fresh challenge for the path and transition it to
210 /// `Validating`. The caller is responsible for transmitting the
211 /// returned bytes (typically inside a `PATH_VALIDATION`-flagged V2
212 /// packet).
213 ///
214 /// Returns `None` if the path is unknown or if it is already in
215 /// `Validated` / `Failed` (re-issuing a challenge from those
216 /// terminal states is the caller's explicit decision).
217 pub fn issue_challenge(&self, path_id: u8) -> Option<[u8; PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN]> {
218 let path = self.paths.get(&path_id)?;
219 match path.state() {
220 PathStateKind::Unvalidated | PathStateKind::Validating => {
221 // OK to issue or re-issue.
222 }
223 PathStateKind::Validated | PathStateKind::Failed => return None,
224 }
225 // PATH-003: hold the pending-challenge lock across the decision so a
226 // re-issue on a path that already has a challenge in flight returns that
227 // SAME challenge (idempotent) instead of clobbering it — otherwise a late
228 // but valid response to the original challenge would no longer match and
229 // would push the path to `Failed`.
230 let mut pending = path.pending_challenge.lock();
231 if let Some(existing) = *pending {
232 return Some(existing);
233 }
234 // Draw the challenge from the `OsRng` seam (SUPPLY-04b). Under
235 // `--features fips` this routes through aws-lc-rs's CTR_DRBG; otherwise
236 // `getrandom`. The seam owns the inventoried getrandom-failure
237 // PANIC-SAFETY contract, so we add no fresh `unwrap`/`expect` here. A
238 // server-issued path challenge is security-sensitive (Invariant 6), so
239 // it must come from the CSPRNG, not a non-cryptographic source.
240 let mut challenge = [0u8; PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN];
241 OsRng.fill_bytes(&mut challenge);
242 *pending = Some(challenge);
243 drop(pending);
244 path.set_state(PathStateKind::Validating);
245 Some(challenge)
246 }
247
248 /// Verify a peer's response to a previously-issued challenge. On a
249 /// constant-time match, transitions the path to `Validated` and
250 /// returns `true`. On mismatch or unknown state, transitions to
251 /// `Failed` and returns `false`. On unknown path, returns `false`
252 /// without side-effects.
253 ///
254 /// `subtle::ConstantTimeEq` is used so a timing observer cannot
255 /// distinguish "wrong byte at position 0" from "wrong byte at
256 /// position 31" — same posture as the cookie check in
257 /// `transport::handshake::validate_cookie`.
258 pub fn verify_response(&self, path_id: u8, response: &[u8]) -> bool {
259 let path = match self.paths.get(&path_id) {
260 Some(p) => p,
261 None => return false,
262 };
263 if response.len() != PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN {
264 return false;
265 }
266 if path.state() != PathStateKind::Validating {
267 return false;
268 }
269 let mut guard = path.pending_challenge.lock();
270 let expected = match guard.take() {
271 Some(e) => e,
272 None => {
273 // Validating state without a pending challenge is
274 // inconsistent — fail closed.
275 drop(guard);
276 path.set_state(PathStateKind::Failed);
277 return false;
278 }
279 };
280 drop(guard);
281 let matched: bool = expected.ct_eq(response).into();
282 if matched {
283 path.set_state(PathStateKind::Validated);
284 true
285 } else {
286 path.set_state(PathStateKind::Failed);
287 false
288 }
289 }
290
291 /// Current state of a path. Returns `None` for unknown ids.
292 pub fn state(&self, path_id: u8) -> Option<PathStateKind> {
293 self.paths.get(&path_id).map(|p| p.state())
294 }
295
296 /// Snapshot of all path ids currently in `Validated`.
297 pub fn validated_paths(&self) -> Vec<u8> {
298 self.paths
299 .iter()
300 .filter(|p| p.state() == PathStateKind::Validated)
301 .map(|p| *p.key())
302 .collect()
303 }
304
305 /// Number of paths in any state.
306 pub fn len(&self) -> usize {
307 self.paths.len()
308 }
309
310 pub fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
311 self.paths.is_empty()
312 }
313}
314
315#[cfg(test)]
316mod tests {
317 use super::*;
318
319 #[test]
320 fn register_new_path_returns_created() {
321 let r = PathRegistry::new();
322 assert_eq!(r.register(7), RegistrationResult::Created);
323 assert_eq!(r.register(7), RegistrationResult::AlreadyKnown);
324 }
325
326 #[test]
327 fn freshly_registered_path_is_unvalidated() {
328 let r = PathRegistry::new();
329 r.register(1);
330 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Unvalidated));
331 }
332
333 #[test]
334 fn issue_challenge_transitions_to_validating() {
335 let r = PathRegistry::new();
336 r.register(1);
337 let challenge = r.issue_challenge(1).expect("challenge issued");
338 assert_eq!(challenge.len(), PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN);
339 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Validating));
340 }
341
342 #[test]
343 fn reissue_on_validating_path_returns_same_challenge() {
344 // PATH-003: a second issue_challenge while one is already in flight must
345 // return the SAME challenge, not mint+install a fresh one (which would
346 // invalidate a legitimate response to the original and push the path to
347 // Failed). Idempotency across the Unvalidated/Validating window.
348 let r = PathRegistry::new();
349 r.register(1);
350 let first = r.issue_challenge(1).expect("first challenge");
351 let second = r.issue_challenge(1).expect("re-issue returns existing");
352 assert_eq!(
353 first, second,
354 "re-issue must not clobber the in-flight challenge"
355 );
356 // The original challenge still verifies (it was never overwritten).
357 assert!(r.verify_response(1, &first));
358 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Validated));
359 }
360
361 #[test]
362 fn matching_response_transitions_to_validated() {
363 let r = PathRegistry::new();
364 r.register(1);
365 let challenge = r.issue_challenge(1).expect("challenge");
366 assert!(r.verify_response(1, &challenge));
367 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Validated));
368 }
369
370 #[test]
371 fn mismatched_response_transitions_to_failed() {
372 let r = PathRegistry::new();
373 r.register(1);
374 let mut challenge = r.issue_challenge(1).expect("challenge");
375 challenge[0] ^= 0xFF; // flip a byte
376 assert!(!r.verify_response(1, &challenge));
377 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Failed));
378 }
379
380 #[test]
381 fn response_without_challenge_fails() {
382 let r = PathRegistry::new();
383 r.register(1);
384 // Bypass issue_challenge — try to verify against nothing.
385 let zeros = [0u8; PATH_CHALLENGE_LEN];
386 assert!(!r.verify_response(1, &zeros));
387 // State stays Unvalidated since we never went into Validating.
388 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Unvalidated));
389 }
390
391 #[test]
392 fn response_for_wrong_length_fails() {
393 let r = PathRegistry::new();
394 r.register(1);
395 let _ = r.issue_challenge(1);
396 assert!(!r.verify_response(1, &[0u8; 16])); // wrong length
397 // The path remains in Validating — short response is not a
398 // failed validation, it's a malformed packet that doesn't even
399 // get to the equality check.
400 assert_eq!(r.state(1), Some(PathStateKind::Validating));
401 }
402
403 #[test]
404 fn issue_challenge_on_unknown_path_returns_none() {
405 let r = PathRegistry::new();
406 assert!(r.issue_challenge(99).is_none());
407 }
408
409 #[test]
410 fn validated_paths_lists_only_validated() {
411 let r = PathRegistry::new();
412 for p in 0..5 {
413 r.register(p);
414 }
415 // Validate paths 1 and 3.
416 for p in [1u8, 3].iter().copied() {
417 let c = r.issue_challenge(p).unwrap();
418 assert!(r.verify_response(p, &c));
419 }
420 // Path 2: issue but fail.
421 let mut c = r.issue_challenge(2).unwrap();
422 c[0] ^= 1;
423 assert!(!r.verify_response(2, &c));
424 // Path 4: leave Validating.
425 r.issue_challenge(4);
426
427 let mut validated = r.validated_paths();
428 validated.sort();
429 assert_eq!(validated, vec![1, 3]);
430 }
431
432 #[test]
433 fn mark_seen_updates_last_packet_timestamp() {
434 let r = PathRegistry::new();
435 r.register(1);
436 // Sleep briefly to make the before/after distinguishable.
437 let before = Instant::now();
438 std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_millis(2));
439 r.mark_seen(1);
440 let path = r.paths.get(&1).unwrap();
441 let seen = path.last_packet_seen.read().expect("set");
442 assert!(seen >= before);
443 }
444
445 #[test]
446 fn re_validating_terminal_path_returns_none() {
447 let r = PathRegistry::new();
448 r.register(1);
449 let c = r.issue_challenge(1).unwrap();
450 assert!(r.verify_response(1, &c)); // Validated.
451
452 // Re-issuing on a Validated path is refused.
453 assert!(r.issue_challenge(1).is_none());
454
455 // Same for Failed.
456 r.register(2);
457 let mut c2 = r.issue_challenge(2).unwrap();
458 c2[0] ^= 1;
459 assert!(!r.verify_response(2, &c2)); // Failed.
460 assert!(r.issue_challenge(2).is_none());
461 }
462}