1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207
use crate::{Doubling, Fragment, Growth, SplitVec};
/// Equivalent to [`Doubling`] strategy except for the following:
///
/// * enables zero-cost (no-ops) `append` operation:
/// * we can append standard vectors, vectors of vectors, split vectors, etc., any data that implements `IntoFragments` trait,
/// * by simply accepting it as a whole fragment,
/// * according to benchmarks documented in the crate definition:
/// * `SplitVec<_, Recursive>` is infinitely faster than other growth strategies or standard vector :)
/// * since its time complexity is independent of size of the data to be appended.
/// * at the expense of providing slower random-access performance:
/// * random access time complexity of `Doubling` strategy is constant time;
/// * that of `Recursive` strategy is linear in the number of fragments;
/// * according to benchmarks documented in the crate definition:
/// * `SplitVec<_, Doubling>` or standard vector are around 4 to 7 times faster than `SplitVec<_, Recursive>`,
/// * and 1.5 times faster when the elements get very large (16 x `u64`).
///
/// Note that other operations such as serial access are equivalent to `Doubling` strategy.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// use orx_split_vec::*;
///
/// // SplitVec<usize, Recursive>
/// let mut vec = SplitVec::with_recursive_growth();
///
/// vec.push('a');
/// assert_eq!(vec, &['a']);
///
/// vec.append(vec!['b', 'c']);
/// assert_eq!(vec, &['a', 'b', 'c']);
///
/// vec.append(vec![vec!['d'], vec!['e', 'f']]);
/// assert_eq!(vec, &['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f']);
///
/// let other_split_vec: SplitVec<_> = vec!['g', 'h'].into();
/// vec.append(other_split_vec);
/// assert_eq!(vec, &['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h']);
/// ```
#[derive(Debug, Default, Clone, PartialEq)]
pub struct Recursive;
impl Growth for Recursive {
#[inline(always)]
fn new_fragment_capacity<T>(&self, fragments: &[Fragment<T>]) -> usize {
Doubling.new_fragment_capacity(fragments)
}
}
impl<T> SplitVec<T, Recursive> {
/// Strategy which allows to create a fragment with double the capacity
/// of the prior fragment every time the split vector needs to expand.
///
/// Notice that this is similar to the `Doubling` growth strategy.
/// However, `Recursive` and `Doubling` strategies have the two following important differences in terms of performance:
///
/// * Random access by indices is much faster with `Doubling`.
/// * Recursive strategy enables copy-free `append` method which merges another vector to this vector in constant time.
///
/// All other operations are expected to have similar complexity.
///
/// ## Random Access
///
/// * `Doubling` strategy provides a constant time access by random indices.
/// * `Recursive` strategy provides a random access time complexity that is linear in the number of fragments.
/// Note that this is significantly faster than the linear-in-number-of-elements complexity of linked lists;
/// however, significantly slower than the `Doubling` strategy's constant time.
///
/// ## Append
///
/// * `Recursive` strategy provides `append` operation which allows merging two vectors in constant time without copies.
///
/// `SplitVec::append` method should not be confused with `std::vec::Vec::append` method:
/// * The split vector version consumes the vector to be appended.
/// It takes advantage of its split nature and appends the other vector simply by owning its pointer.
/// In other words, the other vector is appended to this vector with no cost and no copies.
/// * The standard vector version mutates the vector to be appended,
/// moving all its element to the first vector leaving the latter empty.
/// This operation is carried out by memory copies.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// use orx_split_vec::*;
///
/// // SplitVec<usize, Doubling>
/// let mut vec = SplitVec::with_recursive_growth();
///
/// assert_eq!(1, vec.fragments().len());
/// assert_eq!(Some(4), vec.fragments().first().map(|f| f.capacity()));
/// assert_eq!(Some(0), vec.fragments().first().map(|f| f.len()));
///
/// // fill the first 5 fragments
/// let expected_fragment_capacities = vec![4, 8, 16, 32];
/// let num_items: usize = expected_fragment_capacities.iter().sum();
/// for i in 0..num_items {
/// vec.push(i);
/// }
///
/// assert_eq!(
/// expected_fragment_capacities,
/// vec.fragments()
/// .iter()
/// .map(|f| f.capacity())
/// .collect::<Vec<_>>()
/// );
/// assert_eq!(
/// expected_fragment_capacities,
/// vec.fragments().iter().map(|f| f.len()).collect::<Vec<_>>()
/// );
///
/// // create the 6-th fragment doubling the capacity
/// vec.push(42);
/// assert_eq!(
/// vec.fragments().len(),
/// expected_fragment_capacities.len() + 1
/// );
///
/// assert_eq!(vec.fragments().last().map(|f| f.capacity()), Some(32 * 2));
/// assert_eq!(vec.fragments().last().map(|f| f.len()), Some(1));
/// ```
pub fn with_recursive_growth() -> Self {
SplitVec::with_doubling_growth().into()
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn get_fragment_and_inner_indices() {
let growth = Recursive;
let vecs = vec![
vec![0, 1, 2, 3],
vec![4, 5],
vec![6, 7, 8],
vec![9],
vec![10, 11, 12, 13, 14],
];
let mut fragments: Vec<Fragment<_>> = vecs.clone().into_iter().map(|x| x.into()).collect();
let len = fragments.iter().map(|x| x.len()).sum();
let mut index = 0;
for (f, vec) in vecs.iter().enumerate() {
for (i, _) in vec.iter().enumerate() {
let maybe_fi = growth.get_fragment_and_inner_indices(len, &fragments, index);
assert_eq!(maybe_fi, Some((f, i)));
let ptr = unsafe { growth.get_ptr_mut(&mut fragments, index) }.expect("is-some");
assert_eq!(unsafe { *ptr }, index);
unsafe { *ptr = 10 * index };
assert_eq!(unsafe { *ptr }, 10 * index);
index += 1;
}
}
}
#[test]
fn get_fragment_and_inner_indices_exhaustive() {
let growth = Recursive;
let mut fragments: Vec<Fragment<_>> = vec![];
let lengths = [30, 52, 14, 1, 7, 3, 79, 248, 147, 530];
let mut index = 0;
for _ in 0..100 {
for &len in &lengths {
let mut vec = Vec::with_capacity(len);
for _ in 0..len {
vec.push(index);
index += 1;
}
fragments.push(vec.into());
}
}
let total_len = fragments.iter().map(|x| x.len()).sum();
let mut index = 0;
let mut f = 0;
for _ in 0..100 {
for &len in &lengths {
for i in 0..len {
let maybe_fi =
growth.get_fragment_and_inner_indices(total_len, &fragments, index);
assert_eq!(maybe_fi, Some((f, i)));
let ptr =
unsafe { growth.get_ptr_mut(&mut fragments, index) }.expect("is-some");
assert_eq!(unsafe { *ptr }, index);
unsafe { *ptr = 10 * index };
assert_eq!(unsafe { *ptr }, 10 * index);
index += 1;
}
f += 1;
}
}
}
}