git_policy_cli/policy_checks.rs
1//! What:
2//! The shipped policies as the engine sees them:
3//! one check per policy,
4//! built from
5//! the pure rule cores and the repository facts they ask for.
6//! Why:
7//! The engine owns order,
8//! severity and stopping;
9//! the rule cores own decisions from
10//! arguments;
11//! this module joins them and fetches a repository fact only when a core
12//! asks.
13//! The content policies read the lifecycle's candidates:
14//! they report nothing
15//! where a lifecycle has none.
16//! The Markdown policy checks the candidates it is given
17//! with the native Markdown linter.
18//!
19//! In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
20//! ```ts
21//! // const findings = await policy.check({ context });
22//! ```
23
24/// What:
25/// `use` brings names from sibling files into this file;
26/// `super::` means "the parent
27/// module",
28/// where every sibling file of this crate is declared.
29/// Why:
30/// Each check combines one rule core with the facts interface.
31///
32/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
33/// ```ts
34/// import { decideRequireRoot, resolveRequireRoot } from './rule_require_root.ts';
35/// ```
36use super::diagnostics::EngineFailureCode;
37use super::conflict_side_guard::{SideVerdict, judge_conflict_sides};
38use super::discarded_prune::Limits;
39use super::discard_audit::{AuditOutcome, record_audit, record_audit_with_copies};
40/// Which worktree a command targets,
41/// for the linked-worktree rule.
42use super::effective_target::{EffectiveTarget, classify_effective_target};
43/// The Markdown autofix check,
44/// its state and the linter the executable gives it.
45use super::markdown_linter::embedded_linter;
46/// What the lifecycle offers content policies,
47/// and its prepared candidates.
48use super::policy_content::{ContentState, LifecycleContent};
49/// The dependent-version check over the candidate state.
50use super::policy_dependent_version::check_dependent_version;
51/// The engine's check interface,
52/// findings and outcomes.
53use super::policy_engine::{PolicyChecks, PolicyFinding, PolicyOutcome};
54/// The built-in final-newline check over candidates.
55use super::policy_final_newline::check_final_newline;
56/// The forbidden-strings check,
57/// its settings and its scanner.
58use super::policy_forbidden_strings::{
59 ScannerSettings, ScannerState, check_forbidden_strings, default_scanner_settings,
60 unloaded_scanner,
61};
62use super::policy_markdown::{MarkdownState, check_markdown, markdown_state};
63/// The typed policy identities.
64use super::policy_registry::PolicyId;
65/// The optional root-context check over candidates.
66use super::policy_root_context::check_root_context;
67/// The optional catalog-specifier check over candidates.
68use super::policy_catalog_specifiers::check_catalog_specifiers;
69/// The lifecycle points.
70use super::policy_trigger::Trigger;
71/// The facts interface every check asks.
72use super::repository_facts::RepositoryFacts;
73/// Where a command runs,
74/// and the directory Git works in.
75use super::repository_location::{RepositoryLocation, effective_directory};
76/// The add-explicit rule core.
77use super::rule_add_explicit::{BULK_ADD_CODE, decide_add_explicit};
78/// The branch-worktree rule core.
79use super::rule_branch_worktree::{
80 BRANCH_CREATION_CODE, BranchWorktreeDecision, branch_creation_message, decide_branch_worktree,
81};
82/// The linked-worktree rule core.
83use super::rule_linked_worktree::{
84 GuardedCommand, LINKED_WORKTREE_REQUIRED_CODE, LinkedWorktreeDecision, decide_linked_worktree,
85 dirty_scope, dirty_worktree_message, resolve_linked_worktree,
86};
87/// The require-root rule core.
88use super::rule_require_root::{
89 NOT_AT_ROOT_CODE, RequireRootDecision, RequireRootFacts, RequireRootVerdict,
90 decide_require_root, resolve_require_root,
91};
92/// The worktree's top level.
93use super::worktree_identity::worktree_root;
94/// What:
95/// `OsString` is owned operating-system text of raw bytes.
96/// Sibling the reader might
97/// expect:
98/// `String`,
99/// which must be valid UTF-8.
100/// Why:
101/// The command's arguments are kept exactly as Git will receive them.
102///
103/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
104/// ```ts
105/// // string, but byte-preserving.
106/// ```
107use std::ffi::OsString;
108/// `PathBuf` is an owned filesystem path of raw bytes.
109use std::path::PathBuf;
110
111/// What:
112/// The shipped policies over one invocation.
113/// `<F: RepositoryFacts>` says the record
114/// works with any one type `F` that provides the facts interface,
115/// chosen where the
116/// record is built:
117/// real Git in the executable,
118/// a script in tests.
119/// Why:
120/// Holding the provider by value keeps its remembered answers and its query count
121/// for the whole invocation,
122/// and lets a test read them back afterwards.
123///
124/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
125/// ```ts
126/// type ShippedChecks<F extends RepositoryFacts> = { facts: F; arguments: string[]; candidates: LifecycleContent; allowedWorktreeDirs: string[]; content: ContentState; markdown: MarkdownState };
127/// ```
128pub struct ShippedChecks<F: RepositoryFacts> {
129 /// Whether a pass may propose corrections that its caller applies; the commit path's convergence sets it.
130 pub can_apply_patches: bool,
131 /// Where repository facts come from.
132 pub facts: F,
133 /// The command's arguments without wrapper controls;
134 /// for a direct command,
135 /// the Git
136 /// global options written before `cli-git`.
137 pub arguments: Vec<OsString>,
138 /// What the lifecycle offers content policies.
139 pub candidates: LifecycleContent,
140 /// Tool-cache directories exempt from linked-worktree enforcement.
141 pub allowed_worktree_dirs: Vec<PathBuf>,
142 /// The limits of the folder of saved copies of conflicted files, from `discardedCopies` in `cli-git.config.jsonc`.
143 pub discarded_limits: Limits,
144 /// The candidates once a content policy prepared them,
145 /// shared by every later one.
146 pub content: ContentState,
147 /// Where the forbidden-strings rules come from:
148 /// options and environment.
149 pub scanner_settings: ScannerSettings,
150 /// The forbidden-strings scanner once loaded,
151 /// shared by every later scan.
152 pub scanner: ScannerState,
153 /// The Markdown autofix policy's options,
154 /// linter and exclude patterns.
155 pub markdown: MarkdownState,
156 /// Plain notices the checks produced for the person (a saved copy of a conflicted file), shown before Git runs.
157 pub notices: Vec<String>,
158}
159
160/// What:
161/// The shipped checks for one invocation,
162/// with no candidates yet prepared.
163/// `<F: RepositoryFacts>` accepts any facts provider.
164/// Why:
165/// Every lifecycle builds its checks the same way;
166/// it only chooses what the
167/// content policies may read.
168///
169/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
170/// ```ts
171/// function shippedChecks(facts, args, candidates, allowedWorktreeDirs): ShippedChecks;
172/// ```
173pub fn shipped_checks<F: RepositoryFacts>(
174 facts: F,
175 arguments: Vec<OsString>,
176 candidates: LifecycleContent,
177 allowed_worktree_dirs: Vec<PathBuf>,
178) -> ShippedChecks<F> {
179 return ShippedChecks {
180 can_apply_patches: false,
181 facts,
182 arguments,
183 candidates,
184 allowed_worktree_dirs,
185 discarded_limits: Limits::default(),
186 content: ContentState::new(),
187 scanner_settings: default_scanner_settings(),
188 scanner: unloaded_scanner(),
189 // The linter is linked in, so it needs nothing from the invocation's environment and is ready at once.
190 markdown: markdown_state(Box::new(embedded_linter())),
191 notices: Vec::new(),
192 };
193}
194
195/// What:
196/// The outcome of a check whose repository fact could not be read.
197/// `String` is the owned reason the facts provider gave.
198/// Why:
199/// Every fact these checks ask for is read from the repository,
200/// so its absence is
201/// `content-unavailable`,
202/// never a failure of the policy itself.
203///
204/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
205/// ```ts
206/// const factUnavailable = (message: string): PolicyOutcome => ({ kind: 'failed', code: 'content-unavailable', message });
207/// ```
208fn fact_unavailable(message: String) -> PolicyOutcome {
209 return PolicyOutcome::Failed {
210 code: EngineFailureCode::ContentUnavailable,
211 message,
212 // `None`: a repository fact is about no single file.
213 path: None,
214 };
215}
216
217/// What:
218/// The outcome "nothing found".
219/// `Vec::<PolicyFinding>::new()` is an empty owned list.
220/// Why:
221/// Most checks end this way;
222/// one helper keeps them identical.
223///
224/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
225/// ```ts
226/// const clean = (): PolicyOutcome => ({ kind: 'findings', findings: [] });
227/// ```
228fn clean() -> PolicyOutcome {
229 return PolicyOutcome::Findings(Vec::<PolicyFinding>::new());
230}
231
232/// What:
233/// The outcome "exactly one finding about the command".
234/// `&'static str` is text
235/// baked into the program;
236/// `String` is owned text.
237/// Why:
238/// The four command policies each report at most one finding,
239/// without a path.
240///
241/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
242/// ```ts
243/// const rejected = (code: string, message: string): PolicyOutcome => ({ kind: 'findings', findings: [{ code, message }] });
244/// ```
245fn rejected(code: &'static str, message: String) -> PolicyOutcome {
246 // `vec![...]` is a macro building an owned list from literal items.
247 return PolicyOutcome::Findings(vec![PolicyFinding {
248 code,
249 message,
250 // `None` is the "absent" case of `Option`.
251 path: None,
252 location: None,
253 fix_available: false,
254 }]);
255}
256
257/// What:
258/// The require-root check.
259/// `&mut dyn RepositoryFacts` lends "any facts provider" for
260/// writing (`dyn` means the concrete type is chosen at run time,
261/// like a TS interface
262/// value);
263/// `&[OsString]` borrows the arguments.
264/// Why:
265/// A forwarded command is first judged by its arguments,
266/// because many commands are
267/// exempt.
268/// A direct check has no Git command whose exemption could apply.
269/// The root
270/// and the directory both come from Git's own answer.
271///
272/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
273/// ```ts
274/// async function checkRequireRoot(facts: RepositoryFacts, args: string[], trigger: PolicyTrigger): Promise<PolicyOutcome>;
275/// ```
276fn check_require_root(
277 facts: &mut dyn RepositoryFacts,
278 arguments: &[OsString],
279 trigger: Trigger,
280) -> PolicyOutcome {
281 // `&[]` is an empty flag list: wrapper controls were removed before this point.
282 if trigger == Trigger::PreForward
283 && decide_require_root(arguments, &[]) != RequireRootDecision::NeedsRepositoryRoot
284 {
285 return clean();
286 }
287 // `match` unpacks the answer; `Ok`/`Err` are the success/failure variants.
288 let location: RepositoryLocation = match facts.location() {
289 Ok(found) => found,
290 Err(message) => return fact_unavailable(message),
291 };
292 // `let Some(x) = ... else { ... };` unwraps the top level or returns: no worktree, no root.
293 let Some(root) = worktree_root(&location.identity) else {
294 return clean();
295 };
296 let measured: RequireRootFacts = RequireRootFacts {
297 effective_directory: effective_directory(root, location.prefix.as_slice()),
298 // `Some(x)` is the "present" case; `.to_path_buf()` copies the borrowed path.
299 repository_root: Some(root.to_path_buf()),
300 };
301 // `&measured` lends the measurements read-only.
302 match resolve_require_root(&measured) {
303 RequireRootVerdict::Pass => return clean(),
304 RequireRootVerdict::NotAtRoot(violation) => {
305 return rejected(NOT_AT_ROOT_CODE, violation.message);
306 }
307 }
308}
309
310/// The clock reading the conflict copies are named with, in milliseconds since the Unix epoch.
311fn now_milliseconds() -> i64 {
312 let elapsed: std::time::Duration = std::time::SystemTime::now().duration_since(std::time::UNIX_EPOCH).unwrap_or_default();
313 return i64::try_from(elapsed.as_millis()).unwrap_or(i64::MAX);
314}
315
316/// What:
317/// The linked-worktree-only check.
318/// `&[PathBuf]` borrows the exempt tool caches.
319/// Why:
320/// A guarded form that overwrites is rejected at once in the main worktree and outside any worktree, and in a
321/// linked worktree only while uncommitted state exists; a form that only moves `HEAD` is rejected in the main or
322/// a linked worktree only while uncommitted state exists. Only these need the worktree kind or the status.
323///
324/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
325/// ```ts
326/// async function checkLinkedWorktree(facts, args, allowedDirs): Promise<PolicyOutcome>;
327/// ```
328fn check_linked_worktree(
329 facts: &mut dyn RepositoryFacts,
330 arguments: &[OsString],
331 allowed_worktree_dirs: &[PathBuf],
332 discarded_limits: Limits,
333 notices: &mut Vec<String>,
334) -> PolicyOutcome {
335 // `let Variant(x) = ... else { ... };` unwraps the guarded command or returns.
336 let (command, moves_head_only): (GuardedCommand, bool) = match decide_linked_worktree(arguments) {
337 LinkedWorktreeDecision::Pass => return clean(),
338 LinkedWorktreeDecision::NeedsEffectiveTarget(command) => (command, false),
339 LinkedWorktreeDecision::WhenDirty(command) => (command, true),
340 };
341 let location: RepositoryLocation = match facts.location() {
342 Ok(found) => found,
343 Err(message) => return fact_unavailable(message),
344 };
345 let target: EffectiveTarget =
346 classify_effective_target(&location.identity, allowed_worktree_dirs);
347 // During a merge, rebase, cherry-pick or revert, taking a side of conflicted files is let through after the files
348 // are saved; the verdict also carries the sentence a rejection of the same line gets.
349 let mut conflict_note: String = String::new();
350 if matches!(command, GuardedCommand::CheckoutPaths | GuardedCommand::RestoreWorktree)
351 && matches!(target, EffectiveTarget::MainWorktree | EffectiveTarget::LinkedWorktree)
352 {
353 match judge_conflict_sides(&facts.transaction_context(), arguments, now_milliseconds(), discarded_limits) {
354 SideVerdict::NotApplicable => {}
355 SideVerdict::Refused(note) => conflict_note = note,
356 SideVerdict::Allowed { notice, copies } => {
357 let places: Vec<String> = copies
358 .iter()
359 .map(|copy| {
360 return format!("{} => {}", copy.path, copy.saved_to.as_ref().map_or_else(|| { return String::from("none"); }, |place| { return place.display().to_string(); }));
361 })
362 .collect();
363 record_audit_with_copies(&location.identity, command, AuditOutcome::SavedConflict, arguments, None, places.as_slice());
364 notices.push(notice);
365 return clean();
366 }
367 SideVerdict::CopyFailed(message) => {
368 record_audit(&location.identity, command, AuditOutcome::Rejected, arguments, None);
369 return rejected(LINKED_WORKTREE_REQUIRED_CODE, message);
370 }
371 }
372 }
373 if moves_head_only {
374 // A `HEAD` move outside a worktree or in an exempt cache is not this policy's concern.
375 if target != EffectiveTarget::MainWorktree && target != EffectiveTarget::LinkedWorktree {
376 return clean();
377 }
378 } else if let Some(message) = resolve_linked_worktree(command, target) {
379 record_audit(&location.identity, command, AuditOutcome::Rejected, arguments, None);
380 return rejected(LINKED_WORKTREE_REQUIRED_CODE, format!("{message}{conflict_note}"));
381 }
382 if target == EffectiveTarget::Allowlisted {
383 record_audit(&location.identity, command, AuditOutcome::Exempt, arguments, None);
384 return clean();
385 }
386 match facts.worktree_dirty(dirty_scope(command)) {
387 Ok(true) => {
388 record_audit(&location.identity, command, AuditOutcome::Rejected, arguments, Some(true));
389 return rejected(LINKED_WORKTREE_REQUIRED_CODE, format!("{}{conflict_note}", dirty_worktree_message(command)));
390 }
391 Ok(false) => {
392 record_audit(&location.identity, command, AuditOutcome::Allowed, arguments, Some(false));
393 return clean();
394 }
395 Err(message) => return fact_unavailable(message),
396 }
397}
398
399/// What:
400/// The branch-worktree-only check.
401/// Why:
402/// Explicit creation is rejected from the arguments;
403/// a bare name is rejected only
404/// when Git would create a branch for it from the one remote that has it.
405///
406/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
407/// ```ts
408/// async function checkBranchWorktree(facts, args): Promise<PolicyOutcome>;
409/// ```
410fn check_branch_worktree(facts: &mut dyn RepositoryFacts, arguments: &[OsString]) -> PolicyOutcome {
411 match decide_branch_worktree(arguments) {
412 BranchWorktreeDecision::Pass => return clean(),
413 BranchWorktreeDecision::Creates(command) => {
414 return rejected(BRANCH_CREATION_CODE, branch_creation_message(command, None));
415 }
416 BranchWorktreeDecision::NeedsRemoteGuess { command, target } => {
417 // `.as_os_str()` lends the owned name as a borrowed one.
418 match facts.remote_guess_creates_branch(target.as_os_str()) {
419 Err(message) => return fact_unavailable(message),
420 Ok(false) => return clean(),
421 Ok(true) => {
422 return rejected(
423 BRANCH_CREATION_CODE,
424 branch_creation_message(command, Some(target.as_os_str())),
425 );
426 }
427 }
428 }
429 }
430}
431
432/// What:
433/// The add-explicit check.
434/// Why:
435/// The decision needs the arguments only.
436///
437/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
438/// ```ts
439/// function checkAddExplicit(args: string[]): PolicyOutcome;
440/// ```
441fn check_add_explicit(arguments: &[OsString]) -> PolicyOutcome {
442 match decide_add_explicit(arguments) {
443 Some(message) => return rejected(BULK_ADD_CODE, message),
444 None => return clean(),
445 }
446}
447
448/// What:
449/// `impl<F: RepositoryFacts> PolicyChecks for ShippedChecks<F>` provides the engine's
450/// interface for the shipped policies,
451/// for any facts provider `F`.
452/// Why:
453/// One `match` over the typed policy identity is the whole registry of behavior:
454/// the compiler refuses a policy without a check.
455///
456/// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
457/// ```ts
458/// check(policy: PolicyId, trigger: PolicyTrigger): Promise<PolicyOutcome> { switch (policy) { /* ... */ } }
459/// ```
460impl<F: RepositoryFacts> PolicyChecks for ShippedChecks<F> {
461 /// What:
462 /// The outcome of one policy at one lifecycle point.
463 /// Why:
464 /// Each arm calls the one check that owns the policy.
465 ///
466 /// In TS you'd write (pseudocode):
467 /// ```ts
468 /// check(policy: PolicyId, trigger: PolicyTrigger): PolicyOutcome;
469 /// ```
470 fn check(&mut self, policy: PolicyId, trigger: Trigger) -> PolicyOutcome {
471 // `&mut self.facts` lends the provider for writing; `.as_slice()` lends a list.
472 match policy {
473 PolicyId::RequireRoot => {
474 return check_require_root(&mut self.facts, self.arguments.as_slice(), trigger);
475 }
476 PolicyId::LinkedWorktreeOnly => {
477 return check_linked_worktree(
478 &mut self.facts,
479 self.arguments.as_slice(),
480 self.allowed_worktree_dirs.as_slice(),
481 self.discarded_limits,
482 &mut self.notices,
483 );
484 }
485 PolicyId::BranchWorktreeOnly => {
486 return check_branch_worktree(&mut self.facts, self.arguments.as_slice());
487 }
488 PolicyId::AddExplicit => return check_add_explicit(self.arguments.as_slice()),
489 PolicyId::FinalNewline => {
490 return check_final_newline(
491 &mut self.content,
492 &self.candidates,
493 &mut self.facts,
494 trigger,
495 self.can_apply_patches,
496 );
497 }
498 PolicyId::ForbiddenRootContext => {
499 return check_root_context(&mut self.content, &self.candidates, &mut self.facts);
500 }
501 PolicyId::MarkdownAutofix => {
502 return check_markdown(
503 &mut self.content,
504 &self.candidates,
505 &mut self.facts,
506 &mut self.markdown,
507 trigger,
508 );
509 }
510 PolicyId::DependentVersionBump => {
511 return check_dependent_version(
512 &mut self.content,
513 &self.candidates,
514 &mut self.facts,
515 trigger,
516 );
517 }
518 PolicyId::CatalogSpecifiers => {
519 return check_catalog_specifiers(
520 &mut self.content,
521 &self.candidates,
522 &mut self.facts,
523 );
524 }
525 PolicyId::ForbiddenStrings => {
526 return check_forbidden_strings(
527 &mut self.content,
528 &self.candidates,
529 &mut self.facts,
530 &self.scanner_settings,
531 &mut self.scanner,
532 );
533 }
534 }
535 }
536}
537
538/// Per-policy outcomes and lazy fact use stay out of the release executable.
539#[cfg(test)]
540#[path = "policy_checks_tests.rs"]
541mod tests;