makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`facet`] renders `makeover_layout::Facet`: a dimension a set is narrowed by,
46//! and the one phase-B emitter whose markup an app is not keeping, because the
47//! markup it replaces was two mechanisms rather than one. A tag's selection and
48//! a tag's browse position were separate state on MNW's discover page, which is
49//! why every filter row there carries a tick box *and* a chevron; one gesture
50//! doing both is what lets the second one go.
51//!
52//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
53//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
54//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
55//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
56//! is the content itself.
57//!
58//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
59//!
60//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
61//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
62//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
63//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
64//!
65//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
66//! not be described as a pure deletion:
67//!
68//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
69//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
70//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
71//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
72//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
73//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
74//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
75//! answer is there and not here.
76//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
77//!
78//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
79//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
80//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
81//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
82//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
83//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
84//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
85//!
86//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
87//!
88//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
89//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
90//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
91//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
92//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
93//! not match each other.
94//!
95//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
96//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
97//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
98//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
99//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
100//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
101//!
102//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
103//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
104//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
105//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
106//!
107//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
108//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
109//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
110//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
111//! never have been handed.
112//!
113//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
114//!
115//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
116//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
117//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
118//! for `geometry.css`.
119//!
120//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
121//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
122//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
123//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
124//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
125//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
126//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
127//!
128//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
129//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
130//! own.
131//!
132//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
133//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
134//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
135//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
136//! back to life.
137//!
138//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
139//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
140//!
141//! ```css
142//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
143//! ```
144//!
145//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
146//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
147//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
148//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
149//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
150//!
151//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
152//!
153//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
154//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
155//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
156//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
157//!
158//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
159//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
160//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
161//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
162//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
163//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
164//!
165//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
166//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
167//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
168//!
169//! # 0.52.0: a markdown field gets the preview it was permitted
170//!
171//! 0.50.0 marked a [`makeover_layout::FieldKind::Rich`] field with
172//! `data-format="markdown"` and stopped there, and nothing read the mark: no
173//! rule, no markup, no selector anywhere in the tree. So a described editor was
174//! a plain textarea carrying an attribute, and MNW converting its four
175//! hand-written section editors onto the member would have *lost* the
176//! Write/Preview pair one of them already has. A permission taken and not spent
177//! turns every conversion into a regression.
178//!
179//! [`form::editor_rules`] and the chrome beside it are the spending. The pair is
180//! a segmented control, so it takes the depth, the focus ring and the chosen
181//! state from rules that already existed; the preview pane is a well, because it
182//! stands where the control stood. Both are gated on the attribute rather than
183//! on a class, which is what the attribute was for.
184//!
185//! **This crate still renders no markdown.** The pane arrives empty and is
186//! filled by whatever binds the editor, which is where the host's sanitiser
187//! already is. A converter here would have moved that guarantee into a crate
188//! with no view of the host's content-security posture.
189//!
190//! # 0.47.0: a range, a chooser's ghost text, and an option that cannot be
191//! picked yet
192//!
193//! `makeover-layout` 0.28.0's three form findings, all of them cheap here and
194//! none of them cheap in the app that found them.
195//!
196//! - `FieldKind::Range` emits `<input type="range">`, and `Field::step` emits
197//! `step`. The step is emitted only when the description carries one: the
198//! browser's own default is `step="1"`, which is what a description means by
199//! saying nothing, and is also what turns a 0-to-1 threshold into a
200//! two-position control.
201//! - A select with nothing chosen emits a disabled, selected, valueless first
202//! option carrying `Field::placeholder`. HTML has no placeholder attribute on
203//! `<select>`; this is the idiom, and `required` keeps working through it
204//! because the option's value is empty.
205//! - `Choice::unavailable` emits `disabled` plus the reason. Where it goes
206//! differs by control and the difference is forced: a radio group gets a
207//! `.form-option-reason` span beside the label, and a `<select>` option has
208//! room for no element at all, so the reason runs into its text.
209//!
210//! # 0.25.0: a cell says what it holds
211//!
212//! 0.23.0 gave a table its layout and left every cell the same. One `.cell`
213//! carried the whole thing, so a cell holding text and a cell holding a button
214//! were one class and one content colour, and a control in a cell was painted
215//! as text. That is the drift [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart)
216//! has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented for nothing here.
217//!
218//! makeover-layout 0.14.0's [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the
219//! four things a cell holds, and [`table_rules`] turns them into
220//! `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`, `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. Only the
221//! first takes a colour: a token carries its own tone, an action is a control
222//! rather than text, and a link takes the action colour from the anchor it is.
223//!
224//! The colour going on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell` is the fix rather
225//! than an implementation detail. On the container it cascades into the parts
226//! that are not text, which is the bug said in one rule.
227//!
228//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` here, where it was
229//! `Option<RowPart>`. A table cell borrowing the list row's vocabulary was the
230//! drift with a type on it: the two answer different questions, and only one of
231//! them was ever about a cell.
232//!
233//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
234//!
235//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
236//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
237//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
238//!
239//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
240//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
241//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
242//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
243//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
244//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
245//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
246//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
247//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
248//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
249//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
250//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
251//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
252//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
253//!
254//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
255//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
256//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
257//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
258//!
259//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
260//! a renderer emits for one.
261//!
262//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
263//! sanctioned: a renderer decides. It was retired outright in makeover-layout
264//! 0.13.0, once this had been its only consumer for a release. The rule hid a
265//! row's actions until hover,
266//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
267//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
268//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
269//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
270//!
271//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
272//!
273//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
274//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
275//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
276//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
277//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
278//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
279//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
280//!
281//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
282//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
283//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
284//! migration anywhere.
285//!
286//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
287//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
288//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
289//!
290//! # Substitution, three ways
291//!
292//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
293//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
294//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
295//!
296//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
297//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
298//! terminal would quantise the two together.
299//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
300//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
301//! decides anything.
302
303#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
304
305pub mod facet;
306pub mod figure;
307pub mod form;
308pub mod list;
309pub mod meter;
310pub mod placeholder;
311pub mod vocabulary;
312
313use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
314use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
315// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
316// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
317// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
318// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
319// rules are as generated as the ones here.
320pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
321use makeover_layout::{
322 Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fallback, Fill, Flow, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token,
323 Tone,
324};
325use makeover_touch::Affordance;
326use std::fmt::Write as _;
327
328/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
329#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
330pub struct Emit {
331 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
332 ///
333 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
334 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
335 pub border_width: &'static str,
336 /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
337 ///
338 /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
339 /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
340 /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
341 /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
342 /// noticed from across a desk.
343 ///
344 /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
345 /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
346 /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
347 /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
348 /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
349 pub focus_width: &'static str,
350 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
351 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
352}
353
354impl Default for Emit {
355 fn default() -> Self {
356 Self {
357 border_width: "1px",
358 focus_width: "2px",
359 class_prefix: "",
360 }
361 }
362}
363
364/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
365///
366/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
367/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
368/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
369/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
370///
371/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
372/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
373/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
374fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
375 text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
376 let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
377 out
378 })
379}
380
381/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
382#[must_use]
383pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
384 match bevel {
385 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
386 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
387 }
388}
389
390/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
391/// the intent may be absent.
392///
393/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
394/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
395#[must_use]
396pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
397 match fill {
398 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
399 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
400 }
401}
402
403/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
404///
405/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
406/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
407/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
408/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
409#[must_use]
410pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
411 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
412 let w = opts.border_width;
413 format!(
414 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
415 top_left.token(),
416 bottom_right.token()
417 )
418}
419
420/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
421///
422/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
423/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
424/// without the fill reads the property directly.
425#[must_use]
426pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
427 let mut css = String::new();
428 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
429 let _ = writeln!(
430 css,
431 " {}: {};",
432 bevel_var(bevel),
433 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
434 );
435 }
436 css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
437 css
438}
439
440/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
441///
442/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
443/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
444///
445/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
446/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
447/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
448/// replaced it.
449///
450/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
451/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
452/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
453const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
454 " --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
455
456/// The class name for a depth.
457#[must_use]
458pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
459 let name = match depth {
460 Depth::Flat => return None,
461 Depth::Raised => "raised",
462 Depth::Well => "well",
463 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
464 // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
465 // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
466 // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
467 // that the stylesheet never defines.
468 _ => return None,
469 };
470 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
471}
472
473/// A prefixed class name.
474///
475/// Public since 0.27.0, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not.
476/// A screen renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the
477/// stylesheet half does or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except
478/// the elements that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS
479/// stays valid and one element is unstyled. quasi-webview carried a byte
480/// identical copy of this function until it could call this one.
481#[must_use]
482pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
483 let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
484 push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
485 out
486}
487
488/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
489///
490/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
491/// every class on every element went through a `format!` before 0.40.0,
492/// including the default case where the prefix is empty and the answer is the
493/// argument. A described table row carried roughly eighty transient
494/// allocations, and this and the escaper were most of them.
495///
496/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
497///
498/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
499pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
500 out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
501 out.push_str(name);
502}
503
504/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
505///
506/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
507/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
508/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
509/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
510/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
511/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
512/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
513///
514/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
515/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
516/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
517#[must_use]
518pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
519 match selector {
520 Selector::Tabs => "tab",
521 Selector::Segmented => "segment",
522 Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
523 }
524}
525
526/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
527///
528/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
529/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
530/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
531/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
532///
533/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
534/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
535/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
536/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
537/// disagree about what the region is.
538#[must_use]
539pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
540 let mut css = String::new();
541 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
542 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
543 }
544 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
545 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
546 }
547 css
548}
549
550/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
551/// nothing.
552#[must_use]
553pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
554 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
555 if body.is_empty() {
556 return String::new();
557 }
558 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
559}
560
561/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
562/// unconditional.
563///
564/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
565/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
566/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
567/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
568/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
569/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
570///
571/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
572/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
573/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
574fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
575 if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
576 // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
577 // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
578 None
579 } else {
580 Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
581 }
582}
583
584/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
585fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
586 let Some(condition) = condition else {
587 return rule.to_string();
588 };
589 let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
590 for line in rule.lines() {
591 // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
592 // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
593 if line.is_empty() {
594 css.push('\n');
595 } else {
596 let _ = writeln!(css, " {line}");
597 }
598 }
599 css.push_str("}\n");
600 css
601}
602
603/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
604///
605/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
606/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
607/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
608/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
609/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
610///
611/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
612/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
613/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
614/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
615/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
616///
617/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
618/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
619/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
620/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
621/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
622/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
623/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
624/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
625/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
626#[must_use]
627pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
628 let w = opts.focus_width;
629 // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
630 // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
631 // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
632 // answer for the one inset ring it had.
633 let offset = match depth.bevel() {
634 // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
635 Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
636 // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
637 _ => w.to_string(),
638 };
639 // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
640 // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
641 // same variable for as long as one existed.
642 format!(
643 ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
644 )
645}
646
647/// Present, visible, and not answering.
648///
649/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
650/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
651/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
652/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
653/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
654/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
655///
656/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
657/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
658/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
659/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
660/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
661/// cascade layer.
662#[must_use]
663pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
664 format!(
665 ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{} color: var(--{});\n cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
666 depth_declarations(depth),
667 State::Disabled.token()
668 )
669}
670
671/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
672/// and disabled, in that order.
673///
674/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
675/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
676/// and by nothing else.
677///
678/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
679/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
680/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
681/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
682/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
683/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
684///
685/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
686/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
687/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
688/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
689/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
690/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
691/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
692///
693/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
694/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
695/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
696/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
697/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
698/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
699#[must_use]
700pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
701 let mut css = gated(
702 hover_condition(),
703 &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
704 );
705 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
706 &format!("{selector}:active"),
707 Depth::Raised.pressed(),
708 ));
709 css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
710 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
711 css
712}
713
714/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
715///
716/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
717/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
718/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
719/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
720/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
721/// [`surface_rules`].
722///
723/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
724/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
725/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
726/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
727/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
728/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
729#[must_use]
730pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
731 let mut css = String::new();
732 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
733 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
734 continue;
735 };
736 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
737 }
738 css
739}
740
741/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
742///
743/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
744/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
745/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
746/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
747/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
748/// drifting apart again.
749fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
750 let mut css = String::new();
751 for name in ["button", "card"] {
752 let c = class(name, opts);
753 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
754 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
755 }
756
757 let field = class("field", opts);
758 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
759
760 // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
761 // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
762 // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
763 // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
764 // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
765 css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
766 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
767
768 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
769 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
770 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
771 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
772 // place to forget.
773 //
774 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
775 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
776 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
777 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
778 let _ = writeln!(
779 css,
780 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
781 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
782 opts.border_width
783 );
784 css
785}
786
787/// Badges and chips.
788///
789/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
790/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
791/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
792/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
793/// decide which of the two it always was.
794///
795/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
796/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
797/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
798/// Text that goes somewhere.
799///
800/// The one inline control, and the vocabulary had no word for it until a
801/// description layer needed one. A table cell has carried `cell-link` since
802/// 0.14.0's part list, deliberately unruled because the cell's own rule covers
803/// it; what was missing is the same thing outside a table, which is what a
804/// described run holds when a sentence contains a link.
805///
806/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
807/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
808/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
809/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
810///
811/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
812/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
813/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
814fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
815 let mut css = String::new();
816 let link = class("link", opts);
817
818 let _ = writeln!(
819 css,
820 ".{link} {{\n color: var(--action);\n \
821 text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
822 );
823 // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
824 // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
825 let _ = writeln!(
826 css,
827 "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n .{link}:hover \
828 {{\n color: var(--action-hover);\n }}\n}}"
829 );
830 let _ = writeln!(
831 css,
832 ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n \
833 outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
834 opts.focus_width
835 );
836 // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
837 // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
838 // stop looking like one.
839 let _ = writeln!(
840 css,
841 "button.{link} {{\n background: none;\n border: none;\n \
842 padding: 0;\n font: inherit;\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
843 );
844 css
845}
846
847fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
848 let mut css = String::new();
849
850 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
851 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
852 let badge = class("badge", opts);
853 let _ = writeln!(
854 css,
855 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
856 Tone::Neutral.token()
857 );
858 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
859 let _ = writeln!(
860 css,
861 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
862 tone.token()
863 );
864 }
865
866 // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
867 // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
868 // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
869 // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
870 // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
871 //
872 // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
873 // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
874 // fighting is worse than neither.
875 let button = class("button", opts);
876 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
877 let _ = writeln!(
878 css,
879 ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
880 tone.token()
881 );
882 }
883
884 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
885 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
886 // markup and waits for phase B.
887 let chip = class("chip", opts);
888 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
889 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
890 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
891 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
892 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
893 unlatched.depth(true),
894 ));
895 css
896}
897
898/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
899///
900/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
901/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
902/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
903/// three are not one member with a flag.
904///
905/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
906/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
907///
908/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
909/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
910/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
911/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
912fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
913 let mut css = String::new();
914 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
915 let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
916 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
917 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
918 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
919 }
920 css
921}
922
923/// The parts of a list row.
924///
925/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
926/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
927/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
928/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
929/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
930fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
931 let mut css = String::new();
932
933 // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
934 // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
935 // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
936 // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
937 // which is the line this crate holds.
938 let _ = writeln!(
939 css,
940 ".{} {{\n list-style: none;\n margin: 0;\n padding: 0;\n}}",
941 class("list", opts)
942 );
943
944 for part in [
945 RowPart::Primary,
946 RowPart::Secondary,
947 RowPart::Meta,
948 RowPart::Actions,
949 RowPart::Tokens,
950 RowPart::Proportion,
951 ] {
952 let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
953
954 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
955 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
956 // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
957 // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
958 // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
959 // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
960 if !matches!(
961 part,
962 RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
963 ) {
964 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
965 }
966
967 // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
968 // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
969 // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
970 // one thing and a renderer doing another.
971 //
972 // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
973 // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
974 // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
975 // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
976 // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
977 // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
978 // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
979 // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
980 //
981 // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
982 // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
983 // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
984 // two arrangements now agree.
985 }
986
987 // A part that may take two lines. `Flow::Tight` gets no rule: one line is
988 // what a run already does, and restating it here would put a declaration on
989 // every part in every row to say nothing.
990 //
991 // This is the shape both webview apps had already written by hand and
992 // commented -- Balanced Breakfast on a feed row's title, goingson on a
993 // problem's body -- which is the whole argument for the description
994 // carrying it. `-webkit-` prefixed and unprefixed together: the prefixed
995 // trio is what every engine actually implements, and `line-clamp` is the
996 // standard property landing behind it.
997 let _ = writeln!(
998 css,
999 ".{} {{\n display: -webkit-box;\n -webkit-box-orient: vertical;\n -webkit-line-clamp: {lines};\n line-clamp: {lines};\n overflow: hidden;\n}}",
1000 class("row-relaxed", opts),
1001 lines = Flow::Relaxed.lines()
1002 );
1003
1004 css
1005}
1006
1007/// A row of things that share their space, and what each fallback gets here.
1008///
1009/// Ruling: wiki `layout-room-and-fallback`, Max 2026-08-18. The bug it answers
1010/// is goingson's `styles.css:702`, which pinned every `.page-header` over the
1011/// pill strip with `position: absolute` and so took the toolbar out of flow:
1012/// zero width contributed to the row it shared, nothing able to collide with
1013/// it, and therefore nothing preventing the collision. Rule 1 of the ruling is
1014/// that every described member is in flow, and these rules are how that is kept
1015/// rather than asked for.
1016///
1017/// # The floor, which is most of the fix
1018///
1019/// `.run > *` gets `min-width: min-content`. That is the derived minimum the
1020/// ruling asks for, in this renderer's own unit and stated by the browser
1021/// rather than by anybody: a member cannot be squeezed narrower than what is
1022/// in it, so members in one flow push each other instead of overlapping. It
1023/// costs no query and no number, and it is what fixes all four measured widths
1024/// whichever fallback the group declared.
1025///
1026/// # What each fallback gets, exactly
1027///
1028/// [`Fallback::Wrap`] is `flex-wrap: wrap`, which is exact. The browser wraps
1029/// the run when the members no longer fit, deciding that from their own
1030/// intrinsic widths, which is the derived minimum doing the whole job.
1031///
1032/// [`Fallback::Stack`] is wrap plus `flex: 1 1 max-content` on the members, so
1033/// a member that cannot sit beside its sibling takes a line of its own and
1034/// fills it. For the two-member run this was ruled on -- a tab strip and a
1035/// band -- that is precisely "a row becomes a column".
1036///
1037/// [`Fallback::Shed`] and [`Fallback::Menu`] get wrap, and this renderer is
1038/// honouring less than the description says. **CSS cannot express either one
1039/// without breaking the ruling's own first constraint.** Both need to know that
1040/// the run is out of room in order to take a member out of it, a container
1041/// query is the only construct that can ask, and `@container` compares against
1042/// a `<length>` -- there is no `@container (inline-size < min-content)`. So
1043/// every honest spelling of Shed here needs an authored breakpoint, which is
1044/// the thing the ruling exists to forbid, and the dishonest ones are worse: a
1045/// clamped height clips by document order rather than by [`Priority`], and
1046/// `display: none` under a viewport `@media` is the `nth-child(n+5)` bug the
1047/// vocabulary replaced.
1048///
1049/// Wrapping is the right thing to do instead. It keeps every member reachable,
1050/// which is the property that was actually broken -- goingson's new-contact
1051/// button left the viewport entirely at 560 -- and it keeps rule 1. A renderer
1052/// answering with less than was described is precedented and deliberate here:
1053/// [`makeover_layout::Region::Columns`] says a terminal stacking a board's
1054/// columns is honouring the description rather than degrading it.
1055///
1056/// The real mechanism needs the shed members to have somewhere to go, which is
1057/// markup and belongs to quasi-webview: an overflow control is a member of the
1058/// run, and the description does not yet say that a member *is* one. Filed
1059/// rather than guessed at.
1060fn run_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1061 let run = class("run", opts);
1062 let mut css = String::new();
1063
1064 // `flex-wrap: nowrap` is stated rather than left to the default, because
1065 // the fallbacks below are read as overrides of this line and a reader
1066 // should not have to know which way flexbox leans to see that.
1067 //
1068 // No gap. Spacing between members is the app's, the same way this crate
1069 // states no margins anywhere else; a gap here would be a size, and the one
1070 // hardcoded size in the mechanism is makeover-geometry's contact patch.
1071 let _ = writeln!(
1072 css,
1073 ".{run} {{\n display: flex;\n flex-wrap: nowrap;\n align-items: center;\n}}"
1074 );
1075
1076 // The derived minimum, and the whole reason a member can no longer be
1077 // overlapped. `min-width: auto` is flexbox's default for a flex item and is
1078 // *not* the same thing: auto lets an item be compressed below its content
1079 // in a nowrap run, which is how a toolbar ends up drawn over a tab strip
1080 // even without anything leaving the flow.
1081 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{run} > * {{\n min-width: min-content;\n}}");
1082
1083 for fallback in [
1084 Fallback::Wrap,
1085 Fallback::Stack,
1086 Fallback::Shed,
1087 Fallback::Menu,
1088 ] {
1089 let name = fallback_class(fallback);
1090 let c = class(name, opts);
1091 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n flex-wrap: wrap;\n}}");
1092 if matches!(fallback, Fallback::Stack) {
1093 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} > * {{\n flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}}");
1094 }
1095 }
1096
1097 css
1098}
1099
1100/// Every class [`fallback_class`] can return, plus the run itself.
1101///
1102/// [`ROW_PART_CLASSES`](crate::list::ROW_PART_CLASSES)'s reasoning and the same
1103/// obligation: a `match` over a `#[non_exhaustive]` enum cannot be enumerated
1104/// from outside, so the list sits beside it and a test holds the two together.
1105/// `run` is in it because it is emitted in its own right rather than only as a
1106/// fallback's fallback.
1107pub const RUN_CLASSES: &[&str] = &["run", "run-wrap", "run-stack", "run-shed", "run-menu"];
1108
1109/// The class a run carries for what it does when it is tight.
1110///
1111/// A run always carries `.run` as well, so an unrecognised fallback -- the enum
1112/// is `#[non_exhaustive]` -- lands as a plain nowrap row with the min-content
1113/// floor still under it. That is the safe failure: every member in flow and
1114/// none overlapped, which is the property, with only the rearrangement missing.
1115#[must_use]
1116pub fn fallback_class(fallback: Fallback) -> &'static str {
1117 match fallback {
1118 Fallback::Wrap => "run-wrap",
1119 Fallback::Stack => "run-stack",
1120 Fallback::Shed => "run-shed",
1121 Fallback::Menu => "run-menu",
1122 _ => "run",
1123 }
1124}
1125
1126/// The progress trough these rules fill.
1127///
1128/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
1129/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
1130/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
1131/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
1132/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
1133///
1134/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
1135/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
1136/// independently were adopted onto.
1137///
1138/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
1139/// something with its content down inside it.
1140fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1141 let progress = class("progress", opts);
1142 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
1143 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
1144 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
1145 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
1146 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
1147 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
1148
1149 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
1150 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
1151 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
1152 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
1153 let _ = writeln!(
1154 css,
1155 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
1156 );
1157
1158 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
1159 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
1160 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
1161 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
1162 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1163 let _ = writeln!(
1164 css,
1165 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
1166 tone.token()
1167 );
1168 }
1169 css
1170}
1171
1172/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
1173///
1174/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
1175/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
1176/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
1177/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
1178/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
1179/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
1180/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
1181///
1182/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
1183/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
1184/// the tone.
1185fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1186 let figure = class("figure", opts);
1187 let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1188 let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1189 let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1190 let mut css = String::new();
1191
1192 let _ = writeln!(
1193 css,
1194 ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1195 Tone::Neutral.token()
1196 );
1197 let _ = writeln!(
1198 css,
1199 ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1200 );
1201 let _ = writeln!(
1202 css,
1203 ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1204 );
1205
1206 // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1207 // noun and stays muted.
1208 //
1209 // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1210 // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1211 // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1212 // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1213 // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1214 // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1215 // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1216 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1217 let _ = writeln!(
1218 css,
1219 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1220 tone.token()
1221 );
1222 let _ = writeln!(
1223 css,
1224 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1225 {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1226 tone.token()
1227 );
1228 }
1229 css
1230}
1231
1232/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1233///
1234/// `makeover_layout::Image` arrived at 0.21.0, found by trying to describe MNW's
1235/// carousel and discovering nothing named a picture.
1236///
1237/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1238///
1239/// 0.36.0 emitted [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1240/// `button` and `card` make. It was wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1241/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1242///
1243/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1244/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1245/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1246/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1247/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1248/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1249/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1250/// disappeared.
1251///
1252/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1253/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1254/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1255///
1256/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1257/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1258/// still loading.
1259///
1260/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1261/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1262/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1263///
1264/// # No size
1265///
1266/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1267/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1268/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1269/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1270fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1271 let picture = class("picture", opts);
1272 let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1273 let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1274 let mut css = String::new();
1275
1276 // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1277 // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1278 // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1279 // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1280 let _ = writeln!(
1281 css,
1282 ".{img} {{\n display: block;\n width: 100%;\n height: auto;\n \
1283 background: var(--{});\n border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1284 Fill::Raised.token(),
1285 opts.border_width
1286 );
1287
1288 // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1289 // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1290 let _ = writeln!(
1291 css,
1292 ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1293 );
1294 let _ = writeln!(
1295 css,
1296 ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1297 );
1298
1299 // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1300 // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1301 let _ = writeln!(
1302 css,
1303 ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1304 );
1305
1306 css
1307}
1308
1309/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1310///
1311/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1312/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1313/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1314/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1315///
1316/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1317///
1318/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1319/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1320/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1321/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1322///
1323/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1324/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1325/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1326/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1327/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1328/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1329/// load.
1330///
1331/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1332/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1333/// the description's, not one app's.
1334///
1335/// # Not spacing
1336///
1337/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1338/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1339/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1340/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1341fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1342 let controls = class("showing", opts);
1343 let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1344 let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1345 let mut css = String::new();
1346
1347 // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1348 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n display: none;\n}}");
1349 // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1350 // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1351 // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1352 // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1353 // reason.
1354 let _ = writeln!(
1355 css,
1356 "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n display: block;\n}}"
1357 );
1358
1359 // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1360 // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1361 // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1362 let _ = writeln!(
1363 css,
1364 "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n display: none;\n}}"
1365 );
1366
1367 // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1368 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1369
1370 css
1371}
1372
1373/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1374///
1375/// `makeover-layout` 0.24.0's [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), and the first
1376/// member here whose whole point is *position*. That makes the magnitude line
1377/// this crate keeps worth restating rather than assuming.
1378///
1379/// # Where the numbers come from
1380///
1381/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1382/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1383/// percentages of the span, which
1384/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1385/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1386///
1387/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1388/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1389/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1390/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1391///
1392/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1393/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1394/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1395/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1396/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1397///
1398/// # Overlap
1399///
1400/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1401/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1402/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1403/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1404/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1405fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1406 let track = class("track", opts);
1407 let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1408 let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1409 let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1410 let mut css = String::new();
1411
1412 // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1413 // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1414 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n position: relative;\n}}");
1415
1416 // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1417 // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1418 // than one of the things.
1419 //
1420 // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1421 // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1422 // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1423 let _ = writeln!(
1424 css,
1425 ".{slot} {{\n border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1426 opts.border_width
1427 );
1428 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1429
1430 // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1431 // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1432 // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1433 // renderer gets for free.
1434 let _ = writeln!(
1435 css,
1436 ".{entry} {{\n \
1437 position: absolute;\n \
1438 top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n \
1439 height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n \
1440 left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n \
1441 width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1442 }}"
1443 );
1444
1445 css
1446}
1447
1448/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1449///
1450/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
1451/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
1452/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1453/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1454/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1455///
1456/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1457/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1458/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1459/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1460/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1461fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1462 let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1463 let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1464 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1465 let mut css = String::new();
1466
1467 let _ = writeln!(
1468 css,
1469 ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1470 );
1471 // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1472 // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1473 let _ = writeln!(
1474 css,
1475 ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1476 Tone::Danger.token()
1477 );
1478
1479 // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1480 // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1481 let _ = writeln!(
1482 css,
1483 ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1484 );
1485 // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1486 // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1487 // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1488 // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1489 // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1490 // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1491 // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1492 // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1493 //
1494 // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1495 // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1496 // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1497 // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1498 // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1499 // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1500 // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1501 //
1502 // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1503 // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1504 // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1505 // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1506 let _ = writeln!(
1507 css,
1508 ".{heading}[data-sortable]::after \
1509 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1510 css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1511 );
1512 for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1513 let _ = writeln!(
1514 css,
1515 ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"]::after \
1516 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content);\n}}",
1517 direction.as_str(),
1518 css_escape(direction.glyph())
1519 );
1520 }
1521 css
1522}
1523
1524/// The frame a table sits in.
1525///
1526/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
1527///
1528/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
1529/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
1530/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
1531/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
1532///
1533/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
1534/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
1535/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
1536/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
1537/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
1538/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
1539///
1540/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
1541/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
1542/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
1543/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
1544/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
1545/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
1546///
1547/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
1548/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
1549/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
1550/// position.
1551fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1552 let table = class("table", opts);
1553 let head = class("table-head", opts);
1554 let row = class("table-row", opts);
1555 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1556 let cell = class("cell", opts);
1557 let mut css = String::new();
1558
1559 let _ = writeln!(
1560 css,
1561 ".{table} {{\n display: table;\n width: 100%;\n}}"
1562 );
1563 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n display: table-row;\n}}");
1564 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n display: table-cell;\n}}");
1565
1566 // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
1567 // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
1568 // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
1569 // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
1570 let _ = writeln!(
1571 css,
1572 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n width: 1%;\n}}",
1573 class("cell-content", opts)
1574 );
1575
1576 // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
1577 // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
1578 // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
1579 // gives it.
1580 let _ = writeln!(
1581 css,
1582 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
1583 class("cell-fixed", opts)
1584 );
1585
1586 // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
1587 // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
1588 // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
1589 // being mentioned already means.
1590 for (size, drops) in [
1591 (
1592 SizeClass::Compact,
1593 &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
1594 ),
1595 (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1596 ] {
1597 let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1598 .iter()
1599 .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1600 .collect();
1601 css.push_str(&gated(
1602 Some(&size.media_condition()),
1603 &format!("{} {{\n display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1604 ));
1605 }
1606
1607 // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
1608 // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
1609 // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
1610 // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
1611 // for nothing here.
1612 //
1613 // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
1614 // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
1615 // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
1616 // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
1617 for part in [
1618 CellPart::Value,
1619 CellPart::Tokens,
1620 CellPart::Actions,
1621 CellPart::Link,
1622 ] {
1623 // Three of the four inherit, each for its own reason: a token carries
1624 // its own tone, an action is a control rather than text, and a link
1625 // takes the action colour from the anchor it is. `CellPart::intent`
1626 // says so by answering with the intent inheriting already gives, and
1627 // pinning that would be louder than saying nothing.
1628 //
1629 // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
1630 // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
1631 // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
1632 // plainly, never land as nothing.
1633 if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions | CellPart::Link) {
1634 let _ = writeln!(
1635 css,
1636 ".{} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1637 class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
1638 part.intent()
1639 );
1640 }
1641 }
1642
1643 css
1644}
1645
1646/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1647///
1648/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1649/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1650/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1651#[must_use]
1652pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1653 let mut css = String::new();
1654 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1655 css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
1656 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1657 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1658 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1659 css.push_str(&run_rules(opts));
1660 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1661 css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1662 css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
1663 css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
1664 css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
1665 css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1666 css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1667 css.push_str(&facet::facet_rules(opts));
1668 css.push_str(&form::editor_rules(opts));
1669 css
1670}
1671
1672/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1673/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1674///
1675/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1676/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1677/// an at-rule.
1678#[must_use]
1679pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1680 format!(
1681 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
1682 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
1683 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n \
1684 Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n \
1685 order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n \
1686 by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n \
1687 @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{}",
1688 in_css_layer(&format!(
1689 ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1690 bevel_properties(opts),
1691 depth_rules(opts),
1692 component_rules(opts)
1693 ))
1694 )
1695}
1696
1697#[cfg(test)]
1698mod tests {
1699 use super::*;
1700 use makeover_layout::Edge;
1701
1702 #[test]
1703 fn every_fallback_class_is_one_a_checker_knows_about() {
1704 // The obligation ROW_PART_CLASSES carries, for the same reason: a class
1705 // this crate can write and the vocabulary list does not carry is
1706 // invisible to the dead-vocabulary seal and to the overlap check both.
1707 for fallback in [
1708 Fallback::Wrap,
1709 Fallback::Stack,
1710 Fallback::Shed,
1711 Fallback::Menu,
1712 ] {
1713 assert!(
1714 RUN_CLASSES.contains(&fallback_class(fallback)),
1715 "{fallback:?} is missing from RUN_CLASSES"
1716 );
1717 }
1718 let names = crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default());
1719 for name in RUN_CLASSES {
1720 assert!(names.contains(*name), "{name} is not in the vocabulary");
1721 }
1722 }
1723
1724 #[test]
1725 fn a_run_gives_every_member_a_floor_it_cannot_be_squeezed_below() {
1726 // The whole of what stops the overlap, and it is not a fallback: it
1727 // applies to every run whatever the group declared. flexbox's default
1728 // min-width is auto, which lets an item be compressed below its own
1729 // content in a nowrap row, and that is how a toolbar is drawn over a
1730 // tab strip even with nothing out of flow.
1731 let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1732 assert!(css.contains(".run > * {\n min-width: min-content;\n}"));
1733 // No number anywhere in it. The minimum is derived by the browser from
1734 // what the members contain, which is the ruling's own requirement.
1735 assert!(!css.contains("px"));
1736 assert!(!css.contains("rem"));
1737 assert!(!css.contains("@media"));
1738 }
1739
1740 #[test]
1741 fn room_is_never_asked_of_the_viewport() {
1742 // The 913 case: a window in SizeClass::Expanded holding a group out of
1743 // room. A viewport query answers about the window and would be wrong
1744 // about the group, which is why the table's @media walk is not the
1745 // precedent this follows.
1746 let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1747 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium] {
1748 assert!(!css.contains(&size.media_condition()));
1749 }
1750 }
1751
1752 #[test]
1753 fn every_fallback_lands_as_a_class_and_an_unknown_one_lands_plainly() {
1754 let css = run_rules(&Emit::default());
1755 for fallback in [
1756 Fallback::Wrap,
1757 Fallback::Stack,
1758 Fallback::Shed,
1759 Fallback::Menu,
1760 ] {
1761 let class = fallback_class(fallback);
1762 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{class} {{")), "{class} unemitted");
1763 }
1764 // Stack is the one that also says what a member does with the line it
1765 // took, which is what separates it from wrapping.
1766 assert!(css.contains(".run-stack > * {\n flex: 1 1 max-content;\n}"));
1767 }
1768
1769 #[test]
1770 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
1771 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
1772 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
1773 let opts = Emit::default();
1774 assert_eq!(
1775 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
1776 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
1777 );
1778 assert_eq!(
1779 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
1780 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
1781 );
1782 }
1783
1784 #[test]
1785 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
1786 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1787 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
1788 assert!(
1789 !css.contains("rgb"),
1790 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
1791 );
1792 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
1793 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
1794 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
1795 }
1796
1797 #[test]
1798 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
1799 assert_eq!(
1800 fill_var(Fill::Well),
1801 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
1802 );
1803 // Nothing else needs one.
1804 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
1805 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
1806 }
1807
1808 #[test]
1809 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
1810 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1811 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
1812 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
1813 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
1814 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
1815 }
1816
1817 /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
1818 /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
1819 ///
1820 /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
1821 /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
1822 /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
1823 /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
1824 /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
1825 #[test]
1826 fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
1827 let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
1828 assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
1829 assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
1830 assert!(
1831 !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
1832 "elevation is not a depth class"
1833 );
1834 }
1835
1836 #[test]
1837 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
1838 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1839 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
1840 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
1841 // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
1842 assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
1843 assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
1844 }
1845
1846 #[test]
1847 fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
1848 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1849 // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
1850 // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
1851 // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
1852 for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
1853 assert!(
1854 !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
1855 "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
1856 );
1857 }
1858 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
1859 }
1860
1861 #[test]
1862 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
1863 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
1864 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
1865 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
1866 // of the three could be deleted.
1867 let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1868 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
1869 assert!(
1870 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
1871 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
1872 );
1873 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1874 }
1875
1876 #[test]
1877 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
1878 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
1879 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
1880 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
1881 // moves.
1882 //
1883 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
1884 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
1885 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
1886 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
1887 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1888 let mut checked = 0;
1889 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
1890 if !rule.contains(":active") {
1891 continue;
1892 }
1893 checked += 1;
1894 assert!(
1895 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
1896 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
1897 );
1898 }
1899 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
1900 assert_eq!(
1901 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
1902 Some(Fill::Well),
1903 "the description changed under us"
1904 );
1905 }
1906
1907 #[test]
1908 fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
1909 // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
1910 // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
1911 // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
1912 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1913 assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
1914
1915 // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
1916 assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
1917 let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
1918 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1919 let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
1920 if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
1921 continue;
1922 }
1923 assert!(
1924 line.starts_with(" ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with(" "),
1925 "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
1926 );
1927 }
1928 }
1929
1930 #[test]
1931 fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
1932 // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
1933 // diff every time somebody saves it.
1934 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1935 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1936 assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
1937 }
1938 }
1939
1940 #[test]
1941 fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
1942 // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
1943 // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
1944 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1945 assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
1946 // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
1947 assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
1948 }
1949
1950 #[test]
1951 fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
1952 // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
1953 // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
1954 // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
1955 // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
1956 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1957 for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
1958 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
1959 assert!(
1960 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
1961 "{selector}"
1962 );
1963 assert!(
1964 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
1965 "{selector} has no focus ring"
1966 );
1967 assert!(
1968 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
1969 "{selector} has no disabled state"
1970 );
1971 }
1972 }
1973
1974 #[test]
1975 fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
1976 // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
1977 // states it has and not the two it does not.
1978 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1979 assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
1980 assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
1981 assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
1982 assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
1983 }
1984
1985 #[test]
1986 fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
1987 // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
1988 // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
1989 // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
1990 // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
1991 let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1992 let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
1993 let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
1994 let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
1995 let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
1996 assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
1997
1998 // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
1999 let tail = &css[disabled..];
2000 assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
2001 }
2002
2003 #[test]
2004 fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
2005 // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
2006 // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
2007 // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
2008 let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
2009 assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
2010 assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
2011 assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
2012 }
2013
2014 #[test]
2015 fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
2016 // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
2017 // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
2018 let opts = Emit::default();
2019 let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
2020 assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
2021 assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
2022 }
2023
2024 #[test]
2025 fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
2026 // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
2027 // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
2028 // different rings.
2029 let opts = Emit::default();
2030 assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
2031 assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2032 // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
2033 assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
2034
2035 // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
2036 // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
2037 assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
2038 }
2039
2040 #[test]
2041 fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
2042 // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
2043 // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
2044 // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
2045 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2046 let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
2047 assert!(css.contains(&condition));
2048
2049 // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
2050 // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
2051 // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
2052 // nothing needs no capability answer.
2053 let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
2054 assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
2055 for line in gated {
2056 let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
2057 assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
2058 }
2059 assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
2060 }
2061
2062 #[test]
2063 fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
2064 // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
2065 // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
2066 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
2067 assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
2068 assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
2069
2070 // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
2071 assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
2072 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
2073 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
2074 }
2075 }
2076
2077 #[test]
2078 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
2079 let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
2080 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
2081 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
2082 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
2083 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
2084 }
2085
2086 #[test]
2087 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
2088 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
2089 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
2090 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2091 let badge = css
2092 .lines()
2093 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
2094 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2095 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2096 .join("\n");
2097 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
2098 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
2099 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
2100 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
2101 }
2102
2103 #[test]
2104 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
2105 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2106 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
2107 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
2108 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
2109 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2110 assert!(
2111 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2112 "missing tone {tone}"
2113 );
2114 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
2115 }
2116 }
2117
2118 #[test]
2119 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
2120 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
2121 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
2122 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
2123 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
2124 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
2125 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
2126 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
2127 }
2128
2129 #[test]
2130 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
2131 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
2132 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2133 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
2134 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
2135 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
2136 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
2137 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2138 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2139
2140 let tab = css
2141 .lines()
2142 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
2143 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2144 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2145 .join("\n");
2146 assert!(
2147 tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
2148 "tab was held in: {tab}"
2149 );
2150 }
2151
2152 #[test]
2153 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
2154 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2155 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
2156 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
2157 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
2158 assert!(
2159 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
2160 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
2161 );
2162 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
2163 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
2164 }
2165
2166 #[test]
2167 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
2168 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
2169 // member with a flag.
2170 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
2171 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
2172 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
2173 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2174 }
2175
2176 #[test]
2177 fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
2178 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2179
2180 // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
2181 // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
2182 // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
2183 assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
2184 assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
2185 assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
2186 assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
2187
2188 // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
2189 // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
2190 // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
2191 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
2192 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
2193 }
2194
2195 #[test]
2196 fn a_figures_tone_lands_on_the_delta_when_there_is_one() {
2197 // 0.13.0. The delta is the part that reads as good or bad; the number
2198 // itself is an ordinary fact. A figure with no delta has nowhere else to
2199 // put the colour, so the value takes it, and `:has` is what lets one
2200 // attribute mean both without the emitter choosing an element.
2201 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2202
2203 assert!(
2204 css.contains(".figure[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-change"),
2205 "{css}"
2206 );
2207 assert!(
2208 css.contains(
2209 ".figure[data-tone=\"success\"]:not(:has(> .figure-change)) > .figure-value"
2210 ),
2211 "{css}"
2212 );
2213 // The caption is the noun and never takes the tone.
2214 assert!(
2215 !css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-caption"),
2216 "{css}"
2217 );
2218 }
2219
2220 #[test]
2221 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
2222 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2223 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
2224 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
2225 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
2226 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
2227 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
2228 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
2229 }
2230
2231 #[test]
2232 fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
2233 // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
2234 // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
2235 // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
2236 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
2237 assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n color:"));
2238 }
2239
2240 #[test]
2241 fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2242 // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
2243 // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
2244 // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
2245 // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
2246 // by someone who reads the match as closed.
2247 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
2248 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
2249 }
2250
2251 #[test]
2252 fn a_link_takes_the_action_colour_the_theme_actually_defines() {
2253 // `--action-primary` shipped here for months and no theme has ever
2254 // defined it, so every `.link` dropped its colour declaration outright
2255 // and fell back to inherited text. Nothing caught it because the sheet
2256 // is valid CSS either way; MNW's no-undefined-token lint is what found
2257 // it, 2026-08-14. The hover arm two lines below was always `--action-hover`,
2258 // which is what makes the typo legible in hindsight.
2259 let css = link_rules(&Emit::default());
2260 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action);"));
2261 assert!(!css.contains("--action-primary"));
2262 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action-hover);"));
2263 }
2264
2265 #[test]
2266 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
2267 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2268 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
2269 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2270 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
2271 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
2272 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
2273 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
2274 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
2275 }
2276
2277 #[test]
2278 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
2279 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2280 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
2281 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
2282 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
2283 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
2284 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2285 assert!(
2286 css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2287 "missing progress tone {tone}"
2288 );
2289 }
2290 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
2291 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
2292 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
2293 }
2294
2295 #[test]
2296 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
2297 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
2298 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
2299 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2300 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
2301 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
2302 }
2303
2304 #[test]
2305 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
2306 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2307 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
2308 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
2309 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
2310 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
2311 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
2312 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
2313 // it say "raised" at the same time.
2314 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
2315 }
2316
2317 #[test]
2318 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
2319 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
2320 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
2321 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
2322 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2323 let invalid = css
2324 .lines()
2325 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
2326 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2327 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2328 .join("\n");
2329 assert!(
2330 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
2331 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
2332 );
2333 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
2334 }
2335
2336 #[test]
2337 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
2338 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
2339 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
2340 let opts = Emit::default();
2341 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
2342 assert_eq!(
2343 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
2344 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
2345 );
2346 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
2347 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
2348 assert_eq!(
2349 interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
2350 interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
2351 );
2352 }
2353
2354 #[test]
2355 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
2356 let opts = Emit {
2357 class_prefix: "mo-",
2358 ..Emit::default()
2359 };
2360 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
2361 for name in [
2362 "mo-button",
2363 "mo-card",
2364 "mo-field",
2365 "mo-badge",
2366 "mo-chip",
2367 "mo-tab",
2368 "mo-row-primary",
2369 "mo-progress",
2370 "mo-progress-fill",
2371 ] {
2372 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
2373 }
2374 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
2375 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
2376 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
2377 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
2378 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
2379 }
2380
2381 #[test]
2382 fn the_class_a_renderer_puts_on_an_option_is_the_one_the_rules_key_off() {
2383 // `option_class` is the contract a screen renderer writes markup
2384 // against, and the rules below are the other half of it. They come off
2385 // one mapping now, so this asserts the mapping is the one that reaches
2386 // the stylesheet rather than that two lists still agree.
2387 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2388 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2389 let name = option_class(selector);
2390 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name} {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2391 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}.chosen {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2392 }
2393 assert_eq!(option_class(Selector::Tabs), "tab");
2394 }
2395
2396 #[test]
2397 fn the_caret_brings_its_own_gap_and_is_the_glyph_the_description_names() {
2398 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2399
2400 // The space is inside the glyph, which is what the other two renderers
2401 // write. Emitted bare, every consumer has to add it back, and the
2402 // obvious way to add it -- `content` in an app stylesheet, which is
2403 // unlayered and so outranks this sheet -- deletes the caret instead.
2404 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25B2\";"), "{css}");
2405 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25BC\";"), "{css}");
2406 assert!(!css.contains("content: \"\\2"), "{css}");
2407
2408 // The arrows this renderer used to draw alone are gone. Composition
2409 // rather than agreement: the glyph comes from `Sort::glyph`, so a
2410 // fourth spelling cannot appear here without appearing everywhere.
2411 assert!(!css.contains("2191") && !css.contains("2193"), "{css}");
2412 assert!(css.contains(&css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())), "{css}");
2413
2414 // Three states, three tones. An idle sortable heading draws its caret
2415 // now rather than reserving a hidden box for it, so there is no
2416 // visibility to order and no reflow left to guard against; what
2417 // separates the states is the colour, and the sorted arms come after
2418 // the idle one because the specificity is the same.
2419 let idle = css
2420 .find(".table-heading[data-sortable]::after")
2421 .expect("the idle caret is emitted");
2422 let sorted = css
2423 .find(".table-heading[aria-sort=\"ascending\"]::after")
2424 .expect("the ascending caret is emitted");
2425 assert!(idle < sorted, "{css}");
2426 assert!(
2427 css[idle..sorted].contains("color: var(--content-secondary);"),
2428 "{css}"
2429 );
2430 assert!(css[sorted..].contains("color: var(--content);"), "{css}");
2431 assert!(!css.contains("visibility: hidden;"), "{css}");
2432 }
2433
2434 #[test]
2435 fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
2436 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2437
2438 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2439 assert!(
2440 css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
2441 "{css}"
2442 );
2443 }
2444 // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
2445 assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background"));
2446 }
2447
2448 #[test]
2449 fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
2450 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2451 assert!(css.contains(".list {\n list-style: none;"), "{css}");
2452 }
2453
2454 #[test]
2455 fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
2456 // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
2457 // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
2458 // them would have to travel with the markup.
2459 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2460
2461 assert!(css.contains(".table {\n display: table;"), "{css}");
2462 assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
2463 assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
2464 assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
2465 }
2466
2467 #[test]
2468 fn a_control_in_a_cell_is_not_painted_as_text() {
2469 // The point of makeover-layout 0.14.0's CellPart, and the table-side
2470 // twin of `the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits`
2471 // above. One `.cell` and one content colour meant a button in a cell
2472 // inherited it.
2473 let css = table_rules(&Emit::default());
2474
2475 assert!(
2476 css.contains(".cell-value {\n color: var(--content);"),
2477 "{css}"
2478 );
2479 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-actions {\n color:"), "{css}");
2480 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-tokens {\n color:"), "{css}");
2481 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-link {\n color:"), "{css}");
2482
2483 // The colour is on the part that is text, never on the container. On
2484 // `.cell` it would cascade into the three parts that are not text,
2485 // which is the bug written as one rule.
2486 assert!(!css.contains(".cell {\n color:"), "{css}");
2487 }
2488
2489 #[test]
2490 fn an_unknown_cell_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2491 // `part_class`'s obligation, taken on for the table side too. CellPart
2492 // is `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a member added upstream must land as a
2493 // bare class rather than as a build that stops.
2494 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Value), "cell-value");
2495 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), "cell-actions");
2496 }
2497
2498 #[test]
2499 fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
2500 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2501
2502 // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
2503 // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
2504 let compact = css
2505 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
2506 .expect("a compact query");
2507 let medium = css
2508 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
2509 .expect("a medium query");
2510 assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2511 assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2512
2513 // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
2514 // already what never dropping means.
2515 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
2516
2517 // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
2518 // exists to end.
2519 assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
2520 }
2521
2522 #[test]
2523 fn a_track_places_by_custom_property_and_never_by_a_size() {
2524 let css = track_rules(&Emit::default());
2525
2526 // Placement arrives from the caller, computed once by Track::fraction.
2527 // If either of these becomes a literal, three renderers have started
2528 // disagreeing about where 09:30 is.
2529 assert!(css.contains("top: var(--track-at"), "{css}");
2530 assert!(css.contains("height: var(--track-for"), "{css}");
2531
2532 // Overlap lanes default so an entry naming neither is full width.
2533 assert!(css.contains("--track-lane, 0"), "{css}");
2534 assert!(css.contains("--track-lanes, 1"), "{css}");
2535
2536 // The refusal that matters. A slot height here would be this crate
2537 // deciding how tall a quarter of an hour is, which is the thing
2538 // makeover-geometry owns and the reason `.track` gets no height at all.
2539 assert!(!css.contains("height: var(--track-slot"), "{css}");
2540 for size in ["px", "rem", "em", "vh"] {
2541 let bare = css
2542 .lines()
2543 .filter(|l| !l.contains("var(--"))
2544 .any(|l| l.contains(size));
2545 assert!(!bare, "track_rules named a {size} outside a var(): {css}");
2546 }
2547 }
2548
2549 #[test]
2550 fn a_relaxed_part_clamps_and_a_tight_one_says_nothing() {
2551 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2552 assert!(css.contains(".row-relaxed {"));
2553 assert!(css.contains("-webkit-line-clamp: 2;"));
2554 // The count is `Flow`'s, not this crate's. If the tier ever means three
2555 // lines, this fails here rather than in an app.
2556 assert!(css.contains(&format!("line-clamp: {};", Flow::Relaxed.lines())));
2557 // Tight gets no rule at all: one line is what a run already does, and a
2558 // class per part saying so is a declaration that changes nothing.
2559 assert!(!css.contains("row-tight"));
2560 assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Relaxed), Some("row-relaxed"));
2561 assert_eq!(crate::list::flow_class(Flow::Tight), None);
2562 // Emitted, therefore checkable: an app's dead-vocabulary seal and the
2563 // overlap check both read `vocabulary::names`, so a class the renderer
2564 // can write and that list does not carry is invisible to both.
2565 assert!(crate::vocabulary::names(&Emit::default()).contains("row-relaxed"));
2566 }
2567
2568 #[test]
2569 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
2570 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
2571 // not only the primitives.
2572 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2573 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
2574 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
2575 for line in css.lines() {
2576 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
2577 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
2578 // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
2579 // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
2580 // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
2581 let trimmed = line.trim();
2582 if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
2583 continue;
2584 }
2585 let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
2586 continue;
2587 };
2588 if value.contains("var(--") {
2589 continue;
2590 }
2591 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
2592 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
2593 //
2594 // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
2595 // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
2596 // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
2597 // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
2598 let opts = Emit::default();
2599 assert!(
2600 value.contains("inset")
2601 || value.contains(opts.border_width)
2602 || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
2603 // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
2604 // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
2605 // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
2606 // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
2607 // which is the other thing this crate must not name. The
2608 // leading space inside the glyph is the same thing the other
2609 // two renderers write into theirs, so it is part of the
2610 // caret rather than spacing this crate decided on.
2611 || value
2612 .trim_start_matches('"')
2613 .trim_start()
2614 .starts_with("\\2")
2615 || matches!(
2616 value.trim_end_matches(';'),
2617 "0" | "1"
2618 | "none"
2619 | "auto"
2620 | "not-allowed"
2621 | "pointer"
2622 // The caret's reserved box. Visibility is presence,
2623 // not magnitude and not colour.
2624 | "hidden"
2625 | "visible"
2626 // The link's two signals. `underline` is a line and
2627 // `inherit` defers to whatever the app set, so
2628 // neither names a colour or a magnitude.
2629 | "underline"
2630 | "inherit"
2631 // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
2632 // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
2633 // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
2634 // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
2635 // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
2636 // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
2637 // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
2638 // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
2639 // is the thing this crate leaves to
2640 // makeover-geometry.
2641 | "table"
2642 | "table-row"
2643 | "table-cell"
2644 | "nowrap"
2645 | "100%"
2646 | "1%"
2647 // The time axis, 0.42.0. `position` is the one
2648 // property whose whole job is where a thing sits,
2649 // which is exactly what this crate spent its life
2650 // refusing to say -- so it is worth being exact
2651 // about why these two are not that refusal
2652 // breaking.
2653 //
2654 // Neither names a magnitude. `relative` says the
2655 // track is what its entries resolve against, and
2656 // `absolute` says an entry is placed rather than
2657 // flowed. *Where* each entry lands is
2658 // `--track-at` and `--track-for`, custom
2659 // properties the caller sets from
2660 // `Track::fraction`, and they are skipped by the
2661 // `var(--` arm above like every other value this
2662 // crate refuses to decide.
2663 //
2664 // The rule that would break the refusal is a slot
2665 // height, and there is none: the track's height is
2666 // the app's, so the percentages have something to
2667 // resolve against and this crate still never says
2668 // how tall a day is.
2669 | "relative"
2670 | "absolute"
2671 // A run's five, 0.49.0. `flex`, `wrap` and
2672 // `center` are structure and alignment, the same
2673 // reading `table` gets: which way members are laid
2674 // out and how they line up, never how much of
2675 // anything.
2676 //
2677 // The two intrinsic keywords are the interesting
2678 // pair and they are the opposite of a size. A
2679 // magnitude is a number somebody chose;
2680 // `min-content` and `max-content` are the browser
2681 // being asked what the members themselves come to,
2682 // which is the derived minimum the room ruling
2683 // requires and the reason no breakpoint appears
2684 // anywhere in these rules. `1 1 max-content` is
2685 // grow, shrink and that basis, so its two digits
2686 // are ratios rather than lengths.
2687 | "flex"
2688 | "wrap"
2689 | "center"
2690 | "min-content"
2691 | "1 1 max-content"
2692 // A picture's three, 0.36.0. `block` is structure
2693 // for the reason `table` is: an inline image sits
2694 // on the baseline and carries a descender's worth
2695 // of space under it, which is a fact about
2696 // replaced elements rather than a size this crate
2697 // chose. `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s two
2698 // named members reaching CSS unchanged, which is
2699 // an intent arriving rather than a value being
2700 // picked.
2701 | "block"
2702 | "cover"
2703 | "contain"
2704 // A relaxed part's three, and the third is the
2705 // awkward one. `-webkit-box` and `vertical` are
2706 // structure: they say the part is a box of lines
2707 // stacked downward, which is the only way CSS lets
2708 // anyone ask for a clamp at all.
2709 //
2710 // `2` is a count of lines, not a length. The
2711 // distinction this crate holds is between naming a
2712 // magnitude -- a padding, a height, a font size,
2713 // all of which belong to makeover-geometry -- and
2714 // naming how many of something there are. A line's
2715 // height is still the app's, so two lines is
2716 // whatever two of the app's lines come to, and
2717 // nothing here decides how tall that is. It is also
2718 // not a value picked here: it is `Flow::Relaxed`'s
2719 // own answer arriving unchanged, the same way
2720 // `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s.
2721 | "-webkit-box"
2722 | "vertical"
2723 | "2"
2724 ),
2725 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
2726 );
2727 }
2728 }
2729
2730 #[test]
2731 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
2732 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
2733 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
2734 }
2735
2736 #[test]
2737 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
2738 let opts = Emit {
2739 class_prefix: "mo-",
2740 ..Emit::default()
2741 };
2742 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
2743 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
2744 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
2745 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
2746 }
2747
2748 #[test]
2749 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
2750 let opts = Emit {
2751 border_width: "2px",
2752 ..Emit::default()
2753 };
2754 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
2755 }
2756
2757 #[test]
2758 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
2759 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
2760 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
2761 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
2762 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
2763 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
2764 }
2765}