makeover_webview/lib.rs
1//! The webview renderer for [`makeover_layout`].
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-webview -->
4//!
5//! # The renderer that needs no palette
6//!
7//! `makeover-immediate` and `makeover-tui` both take a `Palette`, because egui
8//! and a terminal need an actual colour before they can put anything on
9//! screen. A webview does not: `var(--surface-raised)` *is* the late binding,
10//! and the browser resolves it against whatever `themes.js` last wrote onto
11//! `:root`.
12//!
13//! So this crate emits text naming intents, and never learns a colour. It is
14//! the deferral rule with no adapter in the way, and it is why the webview was
15//! always the wrong renderer to derive a vocabulary from: it can express
16//! anything, so it never pushes back.
17//!
18//! # Phase A: the stylesheet
19//!
20//! This module emits component CSS and no markup, deliberately. GoingsOn has
21//! 145 `innerHTML` sites and Balanced Breakfast 175 `createElement` sites, so
22//! moving markup is a migration where adopting a generated stylesheet is not.
23//! The apps keep every line of their markup and gain the classes.
24//!
25//! It is not a deletion either, which this header claimed until the measurement
26//! came in. Adoption across goingson removed 49 declarations net and *added* 25
27//! lines: a rule loses its depth declarations and gains a variant selector next
28//! to it, so the file stays the same size. What phase A moves is where depth is
29//! defined, not how much CSS exists. Numbers and method in the wiki note under
30//! "The deletion test, run".
31//!
32//! The bevel properties are byte-identical to what both apps already
33//! hand-write, which is asserted below.
34//!
35//! # Phase B: the markup, one description at a time
36//!
37//! [`form`] renders [`makeover_layout::Field`], which is the half of phase B
38//! whose description is settled. It emits strings, because both apps
39//! interpolate their fields into larger string-built forms and returning nodes
40//! would rewrite those too. It owns its own escaping, on the reasoning in that
41//! module: a Rust encoder can cover element text and attribute values with one
42//! function, where the apps need four and have to choose correctly at every
43//! call site.
44//!
45//! [`list`] is the other half: column tracks, the narrowing rules, and the cell
46//! containers a row is made of. It stops at the cell boundary and does not
47//! render what goes inside one, on the reasoning in that module. So phase B is
48//! now the frame around content in both directions, and what an app still owns
49//! is the content itself.
50//!
51//! # What phase A settled, and what it costs
52//!
53//! Decided 2026-07-29 against goingson's `styles.css` rather than against a
54//! component list. The useful finding there was that `.btn` (line 644),
55//! `.card` (768) and `.tag, .badge` (882) each hand-write the same
56//! composition, so three quarters of phase A is one rule with several names.
57//!
58//! Two of the four decisions change how goingson looks, and adoption should
59//! not be described as a pure deletion:
60//!
61//! - **Pressed carries its fill.** [`interactive_rules`] emits
62//! [`Depth::pressed`] whole. goingson presses to `--surface-sunken` today and
63//! will press to `--surface-well`, and hovers to `--surface-overlay` today
64//! and will hover to `--hover-surface`. Since `surface-well` inverts by theme
65//! where `surface-sunken` does not, a dark theme presses *lighter* than it
66//! hovers. That falls out of `makeover`'s own derivation, which says outright
67//! that `surface-sunken` cannot serve as a well, so if it reads wrong the
68//! answer is there and not here.
69//! - **Badges go flat.** See [`token_rules`].
70//!
71//! The other two: the progress trough is renderer-local and the scrollbar
72//! track was dropped ([`component_rules`]), and no class prefix ships by
73//! default, so adoption means deleting the app's hand-written rule in the same
74//! commit that adds the generated one. `.card`, `.badge` and the tab classes
75//! all already exist in goingson, and while both rules exist the cascade order
76//! decides which wins. That is the one real risk in adopting this, and it is
77//! why the migration lands per component rather than in one commit.
78//!
79//! # 0.10.0: the states this crate used to leave to its consumers
80//!
81//! [`interactive_rules`] emitted hover and pressed and stopped, because
82//! `makeover-layout` modelled no interaction state. Focus and disabled were
83//! therefore unsayable, and every app completed the primitive from outside the
84//! only way that works: by out-specifying a rule it does not own. goingson
85//! carries 19 such rules and the MNW server 21, and the three focus rings do
86//! not match each other.
87//!
88//! That also blocked the cascade-layer work outright. An app that declares
89//! `@layer` puts its own rules in a named layer, and unlayered declarations
90//! outrank every named layer regardless of specificity, so all of those
91//! overrides lose in the commit that adopts layers. They cannot simply be
92//! deleted, because they are the only thing supplying the missing states.
93//! Emitting the states here is what turns that adoption into a deletion.
94//!
95//! Four states now, in emission order, and the order is load-bearing: they are
96//! all specificity (0,2,0), so disabled beats hover by coming last and by
97//! nothing else. Nothing here reaches for `:not(:disabled)`, which would raise
98//! a selector this crate will shortly be wrapping in its own layer.
99//!
100//! Hover additionally sits inside a capability query now. `makeover-touch`
101//! answers whether a fingertip has hover and `makeover-geometry` spells the
102//! condition; this crate asks and does not decide. goingson's section 60 exists
103//! solely to take the hover state back on touch, which is a fight it should
104//! never have been handed.
105//!
106//! # 0.11.0: the layer contract
107//!
108//! [`stylesheet`] emits into the `makeover` cascade layer ([`CSS_LAYER`], which
109//! lives in `makeover-geometry` because that is the one crate every CSS emitter
110//! in the family already depends on). `makeover-geometry` 0.6.0 does the same
111//! for `geometry.css`.
112//!
113//! The cascade resolves origin and importance, then layer, then specificity,
114//! then source order, and **unlayered normal declarations outrank every named
115//! layer**. So before this, an app that declared `@layer base, components,
116//! responsive` put every rule it owns into a named layer and lost all of them to
117//! this unlayered file, regardless of specificity and regardless of loading
118//! last. Nothing errors when that happens: the CSS is valid, the minifier is
119//! happy, and buttons and badges look subtly wrong.
120//!
121//! That is why the layer belongs here rather than in each app. An app cannot fix
122//! it from its own stylesheet, because the fix is to layer the file it does not
123//! own.
124//!
125//! **What it flips**, and the reason each app wants a look when it bumps the
126//! pin: a generated rule that currently beats an app rule by being more specific
127//! stops beating it. The direction is always "the app wins", which is what the
128//! apps already assume, but a hand-written rule an app thought was dead can come
129//! back to life.
130//!
131//! An app should declare the order once, or the layer's position is decided by
132//! whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:
133//!
134//! ```css
135//! @layer makeover, base, components, responsive;
136//! ```
137//!
138//! [`in_css_layer`] is re-exported for an app that assembles its own stylesheet
139//! from this crate's pieces. goingson builds `tables.css` in its own `build.rs`
140//! out of [`list::narrowing_css`] and [`list::grid_template_columns`], and those
141//! rules are as generated as the ones here, so they belong in the same layer and
142//! this crate cannot put them there on the app's behalf.
143//!
144//! # 0.12.0: the ring gets its own width
145//!
146//! [`focus_rule`] reused [`Emit::border_width`] and emitted a 1px ring. That was
147//! an implementation convenience dressed as consistency with the invalid-field
148//! ring: a bevel and a focus indicator answer different questions, and only one
149//! of them has to be noticed from across a desk.
150//!
151//! Caught while adopting 0.11.0 into goingson, by the check the adoption tasks
152//! ask for. Every consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose
153//! at least 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
154//! goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve selectors. The
155//! design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px, so deleting the app
156//! rules in favour of it would have thinned the focus indicator everywhere.
157//!
158//! [`Emit::focus_width`] now carries it, defaulting to `2px`, and the offset is
159//! the same magnitude with its sign off the depth. Both values are the measured
160//! consensus rather than a new opinion.
161//!
162//! # 0.25.0: a cell says what it holds
163//!
164//! 0.23.0 gave a table its layout and left every cell the same. One `.cell`
165//! carried the whole thing, so a cell holding text and a cell holding a button
166//! were one class and one content colour, and a control in a cell was painted
167//! as text. That is the drift [`RowPart::intent`](makeover_layout::RowPart)
168//! has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented for nothing here.
169//!
170//! makeover-layout 0.14.0's [`CellPart`](makeover_layout::CellPart) names the
171//! four things a cell holds, and [`table_rules`] turns them into
172//! `.cell-value`, `.cell-tokens`, `.cell-actions` and `.cell-link`. Only the
173//! first takes a colour: a token carries its own tone, an action is a control
174//! rather than text, and a link takes the action colour from the anchor it is.
175//!
176//! The colour going on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell` is the fix rather
177//! than an implementation detail. On the container it cascades into the parts
178//! that are not text, which is the bug said in one rule.
179//!
180//! [`list::Cell::part`] is `Option<CellPart>` here, where it was
181//! `Option<RowPart>`. A table cell borrowing the list row's vocabulary was the
182//! drift with a type on it: the two answer different questions, and only one of
183//! them was ever about a cell.
184//!
185//! # 0.23.0: a table lays itself out, and a row shows its controls
186//!
187//! Three things a description could say and this renderer had no rule for,
188//! found together by rendering the MNW server's SSH-keys settings tab through
189//! `quasi` and preferring the hand-written Askama original.
190//!
191//! **A table had no layout at all.** [`list::narrowing_css`] emits the track
192//! list, and it has to be called with the columns, so it works where the
193//! columns are known at build time: goingson builds `tables.css` in its own
194//! `build.rs` and is untouched. A table a description produced knows its
195//! columns at render time, and the rules would have had to travel with the
196//! markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs `style-src
197//! 'unsafe-inline'` that the MNW server is working to drop, or the head, which
198//! an htmx fragment swap does not carry. [`table_rules`] lays a table out with
199//! `display: table` instead, which aligns columns across rows knowing nothing
200//! about how many there are. [`Priority`](makeover_layout::Priority) hiding
201//! moves from a generated rule per dropped column to one rule per drop class,
202//! and [`list::column_classes`] is what puts those classes on a cell. A header
203//! row emitted by a renderer's own code should call it too, or the header and
204//! the body disagree about which column just dropped.
205//!
206//! **A destructive button had nowhere for its tone to land.** `.button` carried
207//! no tone, on the reading that a control's colour is its surface. Every
208//! consumer had written the danger rule itself. It joins the badge in taking
209//! the four tones as colour, off `data-tone`.
210//!
211//! **A list rendered as a bulleted list**, because nothing here reset the `ul`
212//! a renderer emits for one.
213//!
214//! `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` also stops being honoured, which its own doc
215//! sanctioned: a renderer decides. It was retired outright in makeover-layout
216//! 0.13.0, once this had been its only consumer for a release. The rule hid a
217//! row's actions until hover,
218//! and every escape it grew was a report that hiding was wrong for somebody:
219//! `focus-within` for the keyboard, the capability gate for a fingertip with no
220//! way to unhide. What survived hid the controls from pointer users alone, who
221//! are the ones scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
222//!
223//! # 0.17.0: the depth classes stop being controls
224//!
225//! [`depth_rules`] gave `.raised` the whole interactive set. A depth is a
226//! statement about shape, so that left the vocabulary with no raised surface
227//! that is merely an object, and an app wanting one had two moves: write its
228//! own class from tokens, or take a control class and cancel the control half.
229//! goingson took the second, in three variants over sixteen elements
230//! (`.card--static` at 14 call sites, `.card--muted` at 2, `.card--shell` at 1),
231//! each re-asserting the resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`.
232//!
233//! Measured before changing it: `.raised` is emitted into goingson, Balanced
234//! Breakfast and the MNW server, and none of the three has a single call site.
235//! The states were unasked-for everywhere at once, and dropping them costs no
236//! migration anywhere.
237//!
238//! `.card` and `.button` are unchanged. They are the same depth *and* controls,
239//! and they take their states from [`surface_rules`], which is where a state
240//! belongs: on the thing that claims to answer a pointer.
241//!
242//! # Substitution, three ways
243//!
244//! `Fill::Well` has no colour on makeover before 2.3.0, and each renderer
245//! answers that differently, which is the evidence that dropping
246//! `Fill::fallback` from the description was right:
247//!
248//! - `makeover-immediate` substitutes the page in Rust.
249//! - `makeover-tui` refuses to substitute and draws an edge instead, because a
250//! terminal would quantise the two together.
251//! - here, CSS already has the mechanism: `var(--surface-well,
252//! var(--surface-page))` falls back in the browser, and nothing in Rust
253//! decides anything.
254
255#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
256
257pub mod figure;
258pub mod form;
259pub mod list;
260pub mod meter;
261pub mod placeholder;
262pub mod vocabulary;
263
264use crate::list::{cell_part_class, part_class};
265use makeover_geometry::{Density, SizeClass};
266// Re-exported rather than redefined. An app assembling its own stylesheet out
267// of this crate's pieces needs the same layer name, and most such apps depend
268// on this crate and not on `makeover-geometry` directly: goingson builds
269// `tables.css` in its own build.rs from [`list::narrowing_css`], and those
270// rules are as generated as the ones here.
271pub use makeover_geometry::{CSS_LAYER, in_css_layer};
272use makeover_layout::{
273 Bevel, CellPart, Depth, Fill, Intent, RowPart, Selector, Sort, State, Token, Tone,
274};
275use makeover_touch::Affordance;
276use std::fmt::Write as _;
277
278/// How the emitted CSS is shaped.
279#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
280pub struct Emit {
281 /// Bevel thickness, as a CSS length.
282 ///
283 /// A value, so it arrives from the caller: border widths belong to
284 /// `makeover-geometry` and will come from there once it carries them.
285 pub border_width: &'static str,
286 /// Focus ring thickness, as a CSS length.
287 ///
288 /// Separate from [`border_width`](Self::border_width), which it reused
289 /// until 0.12.0. That reuse was an implementation convenience dressed as
290 /// consistency, and it emitted a 1px ring: a bevel and a focus indicator
291 /// are answering different questions, and only one of them has to be
292 /// noticed from across a desk.
293 ///
294 /// The default is the measured consensus rather than a new opinion. Every
295 /// consumer had already written its own ring and all three chose at least
296 /// 2px: the MNW server 2px across 10 rules, Balanced Breakfast 2px,
297 /// goingson 2px on three rules and 3px on the one covering twelve
298 /// selectors. The design system was the only thing in the tree saying 1px.
299 pub focus_width: &'static str,
300 /// Prefix for emitted class names, without the leading dot.
301 pub class_prefix: &'static str,
302}
303
304impl Default for Emit {
305 fn default() -> Self {
306 Self {
307 border_width: "1px",
308 focus_width: "2px",
309 class_prefix: "",
310 }
311 }
312}
313
314/// A string as CSS escapes, for a `content` value.
315///
316/// `\u{25B2}` becomes `\25B2`. Emitted escaped rather than literally so the
317/// stylesheet is ASCII whatever the description spells: a `content` string is
318/// read by whatever encoding the consumer serves the file as, and a caret that
319/// depends on that is a caret that works on one machine.
320///
321/// Terminated by the closing quote at every site here. A CSS hex escape takes
322/// up to six digits and ends at the first character that cannot be one, so an
323/// escape followed by more text would need a space that these do not.
324fn css_escape(text: &str) -> String {
325 text.chars().fold(String::new(), |mut out, c| {
326 let _ = write!(out, "\\{:X}", c as u32);
327 out
328 })
329}
330
331/// The CSS custom property holding a bevel's composition.
332#[must_use]
333pub fn bevel_var(bevel: Bevel) -> &'static str {
334 match bevel {
335 Bevel::Raised => "--bevel-raised",
336 Bevel::Inset => "--bevel-inset",
337 }
338}
339
340/// A `var()` reference to a fill intent, with the browser's own fallback where
341/// the intent may be absent.
342///
343/// The fallback is CSS syntax, not a decision made here. That is the whole
344/// difference between this renderer and the other two.
345#[must_use]
346pub fn fill_var(fill: Fill) -> String {
347 match fill {
348 Fill::Well => format!("var(--{}, var(--{}))", fill.token(), Fill::Page.token()),
349 other => format!("var(--{})", other.token()),
350 }
351}
352
353/// The two-tone edge as a `box-shadow` value.
354///
355/// Two inset shadows, one per corner pair: the light one offset down and
356/// right so it lands on the top and left edges, the dark one the other way.
357/// The same assignment `makeover-immediate` draws with polylines and
358/// `makeover-tui` draws with box-drawing characters.
359#[must_use]
360pub fn bevel_shadow(bevel: Bevel, opts: &Emit) -> String {
361 let (top_left, bottom_right) = bevel.edges();
362 let w = opts.border_width;
363 format!(
364 "inset {w} {w} 0 var(--{}), inset -{w} -{w} 0 var(--{})",
365 top_left.token(),
366 bottom_right.token()
367 )
368}
369
370/// The custom properties both bevels resolve through.
371///
372/// Emitted as properties rather than inlined into every rule because that is
373/// what the apps already do, and because a consumer that wants the edge
374/// without the fill reads the property directly.
375#[must_use]
376pub fn bevel_properties(opts: &Emit) -> String {
377 let mut css = String::new();
378 for bevel in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
379 let _ = writeln!(
380 css,
381 " {}: {};",
382 bevel_var(bevel),
383 bevel_shadow(bevel, opts)
384 );
385 }
386 css.push_str(ELEVATION_PROPERTY);
387 css
388}
389
390/// The cast shadow of a surface that floats over the page.
391///
392/// Composed here for the reason the bevel pair is: `makeover` derives the tone,
393/// this crate owns the geometry, and neither has to know the other's numbers.
394///
395/// **Only for a surface that overlays the page.** A menu, a toast, a popover, a
396/// dropdown. A surface *in* the page takes `.raised` and its bevel, and a rule
397/// that reaches for this on a card or a plate has renamed a literal rather than
398/// replaced it.
399///
400/// Two lengths rather than one, because a single blur reads as a smudge at
401/// plate size and as a halo at menu size. The offset is small and downward: a
402/// Platinum-era menu sits just off the page rather than hovering above it.
403const ELEVATION_PROPERTY: &str =
404 " --elevation-overlay: 0 2px 4px var(--elevation), 0 8px 24px var(--elevation);\n";
405
406/// The class name for a depth.
407#[must_use]
408pub fn depth_class(depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> Option<String> {
409 let name = match depth {
410 Depth::Flat => return None,
411 Depth::Raised => "raised",
412 Depth::Well => "well",
413 Depth::Sunken => "sunken",
414 // A depth added to the description since this renderer was last
415 // built. No class, on the same footing as Flat: emitting a name
416 // whose rule body we cannot write would put a class in the markup
417 // that the stylesheet never defines.
418 _ => return None,
419 };
420 Some(format!("{}{name}", opts.class_prefix))
421}
422
423/// A prefixed class name.
424///
425/// Public since 0.27.0, for the renderers that emit markup this crate does not.
426/// A screen renderer writing `class="row"` has to prefix it the way the
427/// stylesheet half does or a prefixed app gets rules matching everything except
428/// the elements that renderer wrote, and the failure is invisible: the CSS
429/// stays valid and one element is unstyled. quasi-webview carried a byte
430/// identical copy of this function until it could call this one.
431#[must_use]
432pub fn class(name: &str, opts: &Emit) -> String {
433 let mut out = String::with_capacity(opts.class_prefix.len() + name.len());
434 push_class(&mut out, name, opts);
435 out
436}
437
438/// A prefixed class name, written into a buffer the caller already has.
439///
440/// The form the emitters use, and the reason it exists is [`escape_into`]'s:
441/// every class on every element went through a `format!` before 0.40.0,
442/// including the default case where the prefix is empty and the answer is the
443/// argument. A described table row carried roughly eighty transient
444/// allocations, and this and the escaper were most of them.
445///
446/// [`class`] stays for callers holding a name rather than a buffer.
447///
448/// [`escape_into`]: crate::form::escape_into
449pub fn push_class(out: &mut String, name: &str, opts: &Emit) {
450 out.push_str(opts.class_prefix);
451 out.push_str(name);
452}
453
454/// The class an option of a selector carries, which is what the rules key off.
455///
456/// Named for the option and not for the group: [`selector_rules`] styles the
457/// thing that gets picked, so `Selector::Tabs` is `tab` and not `tabs`. The
458/// distinction is not pedantry. quasi-webview spelled these `tabs`, `segmented`
459/// and `option`, put `toggle` on the wrapping element rather than on the
460/// buttons inside it, and every described selector in that renderer came out
461/// with no depth, no focus ring and no chosen state, while the toggle group got
462/// a bevel meant for its buttons.
463///
464/// The chosen option additionally carries `chosen`, the same way a latched chip
465/// carries `latched`. That name is this crate's too; there is no reason for a
466/// caller to spell it, and [`selector_rules`] is where it is written down.
467#[must_use]
468pub fn option_class(selector: Selector) -> &'static str {
469 match selector {
470 Selector::Tabs => "tab",
471 Selector::Segmented => "segment",
472 Selector::Toggle => "toggle",
473 }
474}
475
476/// The fill and edge declarations for a depth, as a rule body.
477///
478/// Empty for [`Depth::Flat`], which has neither and inherits what it sits on.
479/// Callers lean on the emptiness to skip the rule rather than emit a class that
480/// sets nothing: a class that sets no properties is a class that means "I
481/// thought about this", which is what comments are for.
482///
483/// The two halves are emitted independently because [`Depth::Sunken`] has a
484/// fill and no bevel. Requiring both, which this did before makeover-layout
485/// 0.3.0, silently dropped the fill for exactly that case. Independent does not
486/// mean unpaired: both halves still come off one `Depth`, so they cannot
487/// disagree about what the region is.
488#[must_use]
489pub fn depth_declarations(depth: Depth) -> String {
490 let mut css = String::new();
491 if let Some(fill) = depth.fill() {
492 let _ = writeln!(css, " background: {};", fill_var(fill));
493 }
494 if let Some(bevel) = depth.bevel() {
495 let _ = writeln!(css, " box-shadow: var({});", bevel_var(bevel));
496 }
497 css
498}
499
500/// One rule giving a selector a depth, or nothing when the depth declares
501/// nothing.
502#[must_use]
503pub fn depth_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
504 let body = depth_declarations(depth);
505 if body.is_empty() {
506 return String::new();
507 }
508 format!(".{selector} {{\n{body}}}\n")
509}
510
511/// The media condition a hover rule has to sit inside, or `None` if hover is
512/// unconditional.
513///
514/// Two crates answer this and neither answer is made here. `makeover-touch`
515/// owns *whether* hover exists at a density, and `makeover-geometry` owns how
516/// that capability is spelled as a media condition. Asking both is what stops
517/// this renderer minting a third opinion, which is what all three apps did:
518/// goingson sniffed the user agent, Balanced Breakfast used `(hover: none)`
519/// alone, and the MNW server had no gate at all.
520///
521/// [`SizeClass`] is required by [`Affordance::available`] and ignored by this
522/// member, which reports as much through `reads_size`. Passing Compact is not
523/// a claim about width; the test below pins that every class agrees.
524fn hover_condition() -> Option<&'static str> {
525 if Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact) {
526 // A fingertip grew a hover state. Nothing to gate, and this renderer
527 // should not invent a reason to gate anyway.
528 None
529 } else {
530 Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition())
531 }
532}
533
534/// Put a rule inside a media query, or leave it alone.
535fn gated(condition: Option<&str>, rule: &str) -> String {
536 let Some(condition) = condition else {
537 return rule.to_string();
538 };
539 let mut css = format!("@media {condition} {{\n");
540 for line in rule.lines() {
541 // Blank lines stay blank. Indenting one leaves trailing whitespace,
542 // which is the sort of thing a formatter later reverts and calls a diff.
543 if line.is_empty() {
544 css.push('\n');
545 } else {
546 let _ = writeln!(css, " {line}");
547 }
548 }
549 css.push_str("}\n");
550 css
551}
552
553/// The keyboard focus ring, placed by the depth it lands on.
554///
555/// This is the webview's **focus ring** and nothing more. **Reach** and
556/// **focus** are both the browser's — the document decides what is reachable
557/// and `:focus-visible` decides which reached thing wears the ring — and no
558/// description states either. The three terms are defined once in
559/// `makeover_layout`'s crate header, "Reach, focus and the focus ring".
560///
561/// One ring for the whole system, because a focus ring's job is to be
562/// recognised and three apps having three of them is the failure. What varies
563/// is where it sits, and that comes off [`Depth`] rather than off a per-
564/// component choice: a well takes the ring inside its own edge, and anything
565/// standing proud of the page takes it outside.
566///
567/// `outline` rather than the composed `box-shadow` the invalid-field ring at
568/// [`field_rules`] uses, and deliberately the one place the two rings are built
569/// differently. A `box-shadow` ring has to restate the bevel beside it, because
570/// `box-shadow` is not additive and a lone ring silently drops the well out
571/// from under the element. That restatement is a second copy of the depth,
572/// living in a different function from the first, and it is exactly the
573/// duplication `Depth` exists to prevent. `outline` occupies its own property,
574/// so the bevel survives untouched and there is nothing to keep in agreement.
575/// They render the same: both are a flush ring one border-width wide.
576#[must_use]
577pub fn focus_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
578 let w = opts.focus_width;
579 // Same magnitude either way, and only the sign comes off the depth. Both
580 // values are what the consumers had already converged on independently:
581 // 2px out is what all three wrote, and 2px in is the MNW server's own
582 // answer for the one inset ring it had.
583 let offset = match depth.bevel() {
584 // Inside the well, clear of its edge rather than painted over it.
585 Some(Bevel::Inset) => format!("calc(-1 * {w})"),
586 // Raised, or no edge at all. Outside, standing off by its own width.
587 _ => w.to_string(),
588 };
589 // The token by name. It is `makeover`'s, derived from the action colour,
590 // and reaching it through a description member was a second path to the
591 // same variable for as long as one existed.
592 format!(
593 ".{selector}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {w} solid var(--focus-ring);\n outline-offset: {offset};\n}}\n"
594 )
595}
596
597/// Present, visible, and not answering.
598///
599/// Matches the ARIA attribute as well as the pseudo-class, because `:disabled`
600/// only matches form elements and half the things this crate emits are not
601/// one: a `div` carrying `.chip` or `.tab` can never be `:disabled`. Keying on
602/// the accessible state is the pattern [`field_rules`] already establishes for
603/// `aria-invalid`, on the reasoning that one fact read by both the styling and
604/// the accessibility tree cannot drift from itself.
605///
606/// The rest depth is re-asserted rather than assumed, because this rule has to
607/// beat the hover and pressed rules above it. It does that on source order at
608/// equal specificity, not by out-specifying them: every rule this function's
609/// caller emits is (0,2,0), and adding a `:not(:disabled)` anywhere would raise
610/// one of them and have to be unpicked when this output moves inside its own
611/// cascade layer.
612#[must_use]
613pub fn disabled_rule(selector: &str, depth: Depth) -> String {
614 format!(
615 ".{selector}:disabled,\n.{selector}[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {{\n{} color: var(--{});\n cursor: not-allowed;\n}}\n",
616 depth_declarations(depth),
617 State::Disabled.token()
618 )
619}
620
621/// Every state a selector that answers a click implies: hover, pressed, focus
622/// and disabled, in that order.
623///
624/// Order is the whole cascade mechanism here. All four selectors are
625/// specificity (0,2,0), so disabled wins over hover and pressed by coming last
626/// and by nothing else.
627///
628/// Pressed emits [`Depth::pressed`] in full, fill and edge together. Emitting
629/// only the edge is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
630/// var(--surface-sunken)` on three separate rules, and a fill that does not
631/// travel with its edge is precisely the disagreement `Depth` exists to make
632/// unrepresentable. So the pressed fill comes from the description
633/// (`--surface-well`) rather than from whatever each app reached for.
634///
635/// Hover has no member in the description and is renderer policy: a terminal
636/// and an immediate-mode painter have no hover to express. It resolves against
637/// `--hover-surface`, which `makeover` already derives and which nothing
638/// consumed until now. What it *is* gated on is capability, via
639/// [`hover_condition`]. Before that gate existed the apps each wrote their own:
640/// goingson's section 60 exists solely to take back the hover state this
641/// function had just handed it, by out-specifying a rule it does not own.
642///
643/// `depth` is the selector's **rest** depth, used to place the focus ring and
644/// to restore the surface under a disabled control. The pressed rule keeps
645/// inverting from [`Depth::Raised`] regardless, which is what every caller got
646/// before this parameter existed: a tab's unchosen depth is
647/// [`Depth::Sunken`], and `Sunken.pressed()` is `Sunken`, so deriving the press
648/// from the rest depth would leave a tab with no press at all.
649#[must_use]
650pub fn interactive_rules(selector: &str, depth: Depth, opts: &Emit) -> String {
651 let mut css = gated(
652 hover_condition(),
653 &format!(".{selector}:hover {{\n background: var(--hover-surface);\n}}\n"),
654 );
655 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
656 &format!("{selector}:active"),
657 Depth::Raised.pressed(),
658 ));
659 css.push_str(&focus_rule(selector, depth, opts));
660 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(selector, depth));
661 css
662}
663
664/// One rule per depth: its fill and its edge, together.
665///
666/// A depth and nothing else. `.raised` says a surface sits on what is behind
667/// it, which is a statement about the shape and not about what happens when a
668/// pointer arrives, so it emits no hover, press, focus or disabled rule. The
669/// named surfaces are where interaction lives: `.card` and `.button` are the
670/// same depth *and* controls, and they get their states from
671/// [`surface_rules`].
672///
673/// This class carried the interactive set until 0.17.0, which left the
674/// vocabulary with no raised surface that is merely an object. Consumers that
675/// needed one took a control class and cancelled half of it instead: sixteen
676/// elements in goingson across three `.card--*` variants, each re-asserting the
677/// resting fill and bevel on `:hover` and `:active`. Nothing anywhere used
678/// `.raised` itself, so the states were unasked-for in every consumer at once.
679#[must_use]
680pub fn depth_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
681 let mut css = String::new();
682 for depth in [Depth::Raised, Depth::Well] {
683 let Some(class) = depth_class(depth, opts) else {
684 continue;
685 };
686 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&class, depth));
687 }
688 css
689}
690
691/// The three surfaces that are a depth with a name.
692///
693/// `button` and `card` are both [`Depth::Raised`], and `field` is a
694/// [`Depth::Well`] because that is the reading `Depth`'s own documentation
695/// gives a text field. Their bodies come out identical by construction rather
696/// than by hand: three hand-written copies in goingson's stylesheet is what
697/// phase A deletes, and generating them from one call is what stops them
698/// drifting apart again.
699fn surface_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
700 let mut css = String::new();
701 for name in ["button", "card"] {
702 let c = class(name, opts);
703 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, Depth::Raised));
704 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, Depth::Raised, opts));
705 }
706
707 let field = class("field", opts);
708 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
709
710 // A field takes focus and refuses input like everything else here, and got
711 // neither until now, which is why all three apps hand-write a focus ring
712 // for it and no two of them match. No hover or pressed: a text field does
713 // not light up under the pointer and does not invert when clicked, so the
714 // two states `interactive_rules` would add are the two it does not have.
715 css.push_str(&focus_rule(&field, Depth::Well, opts));
716 css.push_str(&disabled_rule(&field, Depth::Well));
717
718 // Keyed on the ARIA attribute rather than on a class, so the visual state
719 // and the accessible state cannot drift apart: there is one fact and both
720 // read it. goingson already drove its invalid styling this way and was
721 // right to; the `.invalid` class this emitted before 0.5.0 was a second
722 // place to forget.
723 //
724 // The ring composes *after* the bevel rather than replacing it. box-shadow
725 // is not additive, so a lone ring silently dropped the well out from under
726 // an invalid field. Flat and unlit: this edge is saying "wrong", and
727 // lighting one side would have it say "raised" at the same time.
728 let _ = writeln!(
729 css,
730 ".{field}[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {{\n box-shadow: var({}), 0 0 0 {} var(--danger);\n}}",
731 bevel_var(Bevel::Inset),
732 opts.border_width
733 );
734 css
735}
736
737/// Badges and chips.
738///
739/// The one place phase A changes how goingson looks rather than only where its
740/// rules live. [`Token::Badge`] is [`Depth::Flat`], so a badge emits no fill
741/// and no edge at all, where goingson ships `.tag, .badge` as a single rule
742/// carrying the raised bevel. Splitting that means reading every call site to
743/// decide which of the two it always was.
744///
745/// What a badge does carry is a [`Tone`], the intent family it shares with
746/// notices and nothing else. Neutral is the bare class rather than a variant,
747/// because it is the absence of a status and not a status called "none".
748/// Text that goes somewhere.
749///
750/// The one inline control, and the vocabulary had no word for it until a
751/// description layer needed one. A table cell has carried `cell-link` since
752/// 0.14.0's part list, deliberately unruled because the cell's own rule covers
753/// it; what was missing is the same thing outside a table, which is what a
754/// described run holds when a sentence contains a link.
755///
756/// Colour and underline only. Whether a link is inline in a sentence or sitting
757/// on its own line is the app's layout, and how much room it takes is
758/// `makeover-geometry`'s. What is here is the pair of signals that say "this
759/// goes somewhere" and nothing that says where it sits.
760///
761/// The visited arm is deliberately absent. A link inside an app points at the
762/// app's own screens, which the user is expected to have been to, so painting
763/// them differently marks almost everything and distinguishes nothing.
764fn link_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
765 let mut css = String::new();
766 let link = class("link", opts);
767
768 let _ = writeln!(
769 css,
770 ".{link} {{\n color: var(--action);\n \
771 text-decoration: underline;\n}}"
772 );
773 // The hover step is the same one every other control takes, and it is a
774 // colour rather than a surface: a link has no box to raise.
775 let _ = writeln!(
776 css,
777 "@media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine) {{\n .{link}:hover \
778 {{\n color: var(--action-hover);\n }}\n}}"
779 );
780 let _ = writeln!(
781 css,
782 ".{link}:focus-visible {{\n outline: {} solid var(--focus-ring);\n \
783 outline-offset: 2px;\n}}",
784 opts.focus_width
785 );
786 // A link is often a `<button>` rather than an `<a>`: a renderer picks the
787 // element from the method, so a link that writes is a button that has to
788 // stop looking like one.
789 let _ = writeln!(
790 css,
791 "button.{link} {{\n background: none;\n border: none;\n \
792 padding: 0;\n font: inherit;\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
793 );
794 css
795}
796
797fn token_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
798 let mut css = String::new();
799
800 // No `depth_rule` call here, deliberately: `Token::Badge.depth(_)` is Flat,
801 // and a label with an edge says it can be pressed.
802 let badge = class("badge", opts);
803 let _ = writeln!(
804 css,
805 ".{badge} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
806 Tone::Neutral.token()
807 );
808 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
809 let _ = writeln!(
810 css,
811 ".{badge}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
812 tone.token()
813 );
814 }
815
816 // A button carries the four tones a badge does. It had none, on the reading
817 // that a control's colour is its surface rather than its text, and that
818 // reading has one hole big enough to matter: the button that destroys
819 // something. Every consumer had written that rule itself, and a description
820 // that says `Tone::Danger` on an act had nowhere for it to land.
821 //
822 // Colour and not a fill, matching the badge. A red surface is a decision
823 // about emphasis that belongs to an app's own layer, and two of them
824 // fighting is worse than neither.
825 let button = class("button", opts);
826 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
827 let _ = writeln!(
828 css,
829 ".{button}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
830 tone.token()
831 );
832 }
833
834 // A chip holds itself down, which is `Depth::pressed` arrived at
835 // independently by two apps. `removable` is a remove affordance, so it is
836 // markup and waits for phase B.
837 let chip = class("chip", opts);
838 let unlatched = Token::Chip { removable: false };
839 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&chip, unlatched.depth(false)));
840 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&chip, unlatched.depth(false), opts));
841 css.push_str(&depth_rule(
842 &format!("{chip}.latched"),
843 unlatched.depth(true),
844 ));
845 css
846}
847
848/// The three selectors, each named by what it picks.
849///
850/// A tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens, which is why
851/// [`Selector::Tabs`] chooses [`Depth::Raised`] where a segment and a toggle
852/// are held in. That is the folder semantic, and it is the whole reason the
853/// three are not one member with a flag.
854///
855/// [`Selector::abutting`] is not emitted: whether the options touch is
856/// spacing, and spacing is `makeover-geometry`'s question to answer.
857///
858/// Both states emit as of makeover-layout 0.3.0. Before it the description
859/// named only the chosen option, so an unchosen one fell through to
860/// [`Depth::Flat`] and nothing was drawn for it, which left goingson's tab
861/// strip hand-writing the recess that makes its chosen tab read as forward.
862fn selector_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
863 let mut css = String::new();
864 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
865 let c = class(option_class(selector), opts);
866 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&c, selector.unchosen()));
867 css.push_str(&interactive_rules(&c, selector.unchosen(), opts));
868 css.push_str(&depth_rule(&format!("{c}.chosen"), selector.chosen()));
869 }
870 css
871}
872
873/// The parts of a list row.
874///
875/// The list is written out rather than derived because `RowPart` is
876/// `#[non_exhaustive]` as of makeover-layout 0.9.0, so there is nothing to
877/// iterate. A member added upstream emits no rule until it is named here, which
878/// is the trade `non_exhaustive` makes: a silent gap instead of a build break.
879/// [`part_class`] carries the same list and the same obligation.
880fn row_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
881 let mut css = String::new();
882
883 // The container the rows sit in. Three zeroes and a keyword, all of them
884 // undoing a browser default the description never asked for: a described
885 // list of SSH keys is not a bulleted list, and it rendered as one because
886 // nothing here said otherwise. Not a size: there is no magnitude in it,
887 // which is the line this crate holds.
888 let _ = writeln!(
889 css,
890 ".{} {{\n list-style: none;\n margin: 0;\n padding: 0;\n}}",
891 class("list", opts)
892 );
893
894 for part in [
895 RowPart::Primary,
896 RowPart::Secondary,
897 RowPart::Meta,
898 RowPart::Actions,
899 RowPart::Tokens,
900 RowPart::Proportion,
901 ] {
902 let c = class(part_class(part), opts);
903
904 // Actions carry controls rather than text, and `RowPart::intent` says
905 // so by returning the same intent inheriting already gives. Pinning it
906 // would be louder than saying nothing. Tokens answer alike, for their
907 // own reason: each token carries its own tone, and a colour on the
908 // strip would fight the things sitting in it. A proportion is the same
909 // case again: the meter inside carries the tone.
910 if !matches!(
911 part,
912 RowPart::Actions | RowPart::Tokens | RowPart::Proportion
913 ) {
914 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{c} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}", part.intent());
915 }
916
917 // A row's actions are shown at rest. `RowPart::revealed_on_hover` said
918 // otherwise and was not honoured here from 0.23.0; makeover-layout
919 // 0.13.0 retired the method, so there is no longer a description saying
920 // one thing and a renderer doing another.
921 //
922 // The rule was `opacity: 0` gated to pointer devices, revealed on
923 // `:hover` and on `:focus-within`. Each escape it needed was a report
924 // that hiding was wrong for somebody: `focus-within` because tabbing
925 // could never reach an action; the gate because a fingertip had no way
926 // to unhide, which both webview apps had already hand-written
927 // `opacity: 1` to undo. What was left was a control hidden from
928 // exactly one group: people using a pointer, who are also the group
929 // scanning a list to find out what can be done to a row.
930 //
931 // A settings screen is where that reads worst: the whole reason to be
932 // on it is to remove a key, and the button doing so was invisible
933 // until pointed at. A table cell's actions were never hidden, so the
934 // two arrangements now agree.
935 }
936 css
937}
938
939/// The progress trough these rules fill.
940///
941/// This was renderer-local chrome with nothing behind it until makeover-layout
942/// 0.10.0, which is the unusual order: the tones below were emitted for every
943/// bar in the tree while the only way to describe one was to concatenate the
944/// numbers into a heading. `Meter` is the word that arrived late, and
945/// [`meter::meter_html`](crate::meter::meter_html) is what now fills these.
946///
947/// The rules stay a superset of what a description can ask for. An app drawing
948/// its own bar keeps these classes, which is what the four goingson grew
949/// independently were adopted onto.
950///
951/// The trough is a [`Depth::Well`], the same reading a text field gets:
952/// something with its content down inside it.
953fn progress_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
954 let progress = class("progress", opts);
955 // `progress-fill` rather than a bare `fill`: an unprefixed build claims
956 // these names in the app's own stylesheet, and `.fill` is grabby enough to
957 // catch things that have nothing to do with progress. goingson already
958 // calls it `.progress-fill`, so this is also the name that deletes.
959 let fill = class("progress-fill", opts);
960 let mut css = depth_rule(&progress, Depth::Well);
961
962 // The untoned bar is `--action`, not [`Tone::Neutral`]. That is the one
963 // place this differs from the badge rules, and deliberately: a badge with
964 // no status is a muted label, while a bar with no status is still
965 // reporting progress, and `content-muted` would read as disabled.
966 let _ = writeln!(
967 css,
968 ".{progress} > .{fill} {{\n background: var(--action);\n}}"
969 );
970
971 // A bar can be saying something, same as a badge: goingson colours subtask
972 // progress as success and an over-estimate as danger, which is real
973 // information rather than decoration. Emitting the tones is what lets that
974 // survive adoption instead of staying hand-written.
975 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
976 let _ = writeln!(
977 css,
978 ".{progress} > .{fill}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] {{\n background: var(--{0});\n}}",
979 tone.token()
980 );
981 }
982 css
983}
984
985/// A strip of figures, and the two spans inside each one.
986///
987/// Colour only, which is the deferral rule applied to a component that badly
988/// wants to break it. A figure reads as a figure because the value is set large
989/// over a small caption, and that is a size: `makeover-geometry` answers how
990/// much space and this crate answers what the thing is. Emitting `font-size`
991/// here would be this crate naming a value, which is the one thing it is defined
992/// by not doing, and `progress_rules` is the precedent — it emits the tones and
993/// never the width, because the width is not its to know.
994///
995/// So the arrangement and the type scale are the app's, and what is generated is
996/// the part an app cannot get right by itself: which of the two spans carries
997/// the tone.
998fn figure_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
999 let figure = class("figure", opts);
1000 let value = class("figure-value", opts);
1001 let caption = class("figure-caption", opts);
1002 let change = class("figure-change", opts);
1003 let mut css = String::new();
1004
1005 let _ = writeln!(
1006 css,
1007 ".{figure} > .{value} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1008 Tone::Neutral.token()
1009 );
1010 let _ = writeln!(
1011 css,
1012 ".{figure} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1013 );
1014 let _ = writeln!(
1015 css,
1016 ".{figure} > .{change} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1017 );
1018
1019 // A toned figure tones one part and never the caption. The caption is the
1020 // noun and stays muted.
1021 //
1022 // Which part depends on whether there is a change, and that is the whole of
1023 // what 0.13.0 changed here. A figure with a delta is an ordinary number that
1024 // has moved in a direction worth reading, so the delta takes the colour and
1025 // the number stays plain; a figure without one has nowhere else to put it.
1026 // `:has` is what lets one attribute mean both, and the alternative was the
1027 // emitter deciding by writing the attribute onto a different element, which
1028 // leaves two elements able to disagree about a figure's one meaning.
1029 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
1030 let _ = writeln!(
1031 css,
1032 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{change} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1033 tone.token()
1034 );
1035 let _ = writeln!(
1036 css,
1037 ".{figure}[data-tone=\"{0}\"]:not(:has(> .{change})) > .{value} \
1038 {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1039 tone.token()
1040 );
1041 }
1042 css
1043}
1044
1045/// A picture, its frame and its caption.
1046///
1047/// `makeover_layout::Image` arrived at 0.21.0, found by trying to describe MNW's
1048/// carousel and discovering nothing named a picture.
1049///
1050/// # The frame is a border, and this is the one place a bevel is wrong
1051///
1052/// 0.36.0 emitted [`Depth::Raised`] here through [`depth_rule`], the same call
1053/// `button` and `card` make. It was wrong, and MNW's landing page is where it
1054/// showed: **the frames had no visible edge at all.**
1055///
1056/// `Depth::Raised`'s edge is `--bevel-raised`, which is an *inset* shadow — a
1057/// 1px light run at the top-left and a dark one at the bottom-right, drawn
1058/// **inside** the element's box. On a button or a card that box is a surface
1059/// this crate owns, so an inset edge reads as the surface catching the light.
1060/// On a picture it is drawn on top of the picture, over whatever pixels the
1061/// image happens to have at its border. MNW's screenshots are light-on-light
1062/// parchment, so the light half landed on a light image and the frame
1063/// disappeared.
1064///
1065/// **You cannot bevel a surface you do not own.** A picture's content is the
1066/// app's, arrives at request time, and can be any colour, so its edge has to
1067/// sit *outside* the content rather than on it. That is a border.
1068///
1069/// The fill stays, and it is not decoration: it is what shows through a
1070/// transparent PNG and what stands in the frame's place while the image is
1071/// still loading.
1072///
1073/// This is a real limit on [`Depth`] rather than a special case. Every other
1074/// consumer of a depth draws its own surface; a picture is the first member
1075/// whose surface belongs to someone else.
1076///
1077/// # No size
1078///
1079/// `width: 100%` and nothing else. How large a picture is depends on the box it
1080/// was put in, which is the app's arrangement and `makeover-geometry`'s scales,
1081/// and a renderer that picked one would be answering for every consumer at
1082/// once. This is where `figure_rules` landed for the same reason.
1083fn picture_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1084 let picture = class("picture", opts);
1085 let img = class("picture-img", opts);
1086 let caption = class("picture-caption", opts);
1087 let mut css = String::new();
1088
1089 // Block, or an inline image sits on the text baseline and carries a
1090 // descender's worth of space under it that no app ever wants and every app
1091 // deletes by hand. The border is the frame; see the type docs for why it is
1092 // not the bevel every other surface here gets.
1093 let _ = writeln!(
1094 css,
1095 ".{img} {{\n display: block;\n width: 100%;\n height: auto;\n \
1096 background: var(--{});\n border: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1097 Fill::Raised.token(),
1098 opts.border_width
1099 );
1100
1101 // The two fits that need a rule. `Fit::Natural` emits no attribute at all,
1102 // so it is the bare rule above and needs nothing here.
1103 let _ = writeln!(
1104 css,
1105 ".{img}[data-fit=\"cover\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: cover;\n}}"
1106 );
1107 let _ = writeln!(
1108 css,
1109 ".{img}[data-fit=\"contain\"] {{\n height: 100%;\n object-fit: contain;\n}}"
1110 );
1111
1112 // A caption reads back one step, which is `figure-caption`'s answer and the
1113 // same claim: it says what the thing above it is, and it is not the thing.
1114 let _ = writeln!(
1115 css,
1116 ".{picture} > .{caption} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1117 );
1118
1119 css
1120}
1121
1122/// A region showing one child at a time, and the chrome that moves between them.
1123///
1124/// [`makeover_layout::Showing`] lets a description say that a region holds
1125/// several children and shows some of them. A renderer derives its own chrome
1126/// from that, which is what stops every renderer growing a `match` on a widget
1127/// name; these are the rules the derived chrome needs.
1128///
1129/// # Why the default is every child, and the enhancement takes them away
1130///
1131/// The controls are a lie until something binds them. A prev button rendered
1132/// into a document with no script is a control that looks live and answers
1133/// nothing, and the reader it lies to is exactly the one who cannot see the
1134/// other children either — the collapsing and the moving are the same half.
1135///
1136/// So the rules run in the direction the enhancement does. Nothing here hides a
1137/// child and nothing here shows a control. Whatever binds the region sets
1138/// `data-ready` on it, and that is what collapses the stack to one and reveals
1139/// the row that moves it. A reader with no script gets every child in order and
1140/// no controls, which is more content rather than less, and a reader with
1141/// script gets a settled page rather than a stack that jumps to one frame after
1142/// load.
1143///
1144/// MNW proved this shape by hand — a `<noscript>` stylesheet opening its
1145/// carousel back out — and it is here rather than there because the property is
1146/// the description's, not one app's.
1147///
1148/// # Not spacing
1149///
1150/// The row's gaps are `makeover-geometry`'s question and are absent for
1151/// [`row_rules`]'s reason. What is here is `display`, which carries no
1152/// magnitude, and the muted readout, which is the same claim `picture-caption`
1153/// makes: it says where you are among the children and it is not one of them.
1154fn showing_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1155 let controls = class("showing", opts);
1156 let position = class("showing-position", opts);
1157 let frame = class("showing-frame", opts);
1158 let mut css = String::new();
1159
1160 // Hidden until something binds it, which is the whole argument above.
1161 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{controls} {{\n display: none;\n}}");
1162 // Block, and nothing about how the three sit in it. A button and a span are
1163 // inline already, so they make a row without this crate saying so, and
1164 // saying so is where `align-items` and a gap would follow -- both spacing,
1165 // both `makeover-geometry`'s, and `row_rules` refuses them for the same
1166 // reason.
1167 let _ = writeln!(
1168 css,
1169 "[data-ready] > .{controls} {{\n display: block;\n}}"
1170 );
1171
1172 // A child is in flow until the region is bound, and then only the current
1173 // one is. `.current` is a modifier for the reason `.chosen` and `.latched`
1174 // are: one name for the state, set by whoever knows it.
1175 let _ = writeln!(
1176 css,
1177 "[data-ready] > .{frame}:not(.current) {{\n display: none;\n}}"
1178 );
1179
1180 // Reads back one step. `picture-caption`'s rule and its reason.
1181 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{position} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1182
1183 css
1184}
1185
1186/// A time axis: the container, its gridlines and ruler, and the placed things.
1187///
1188/// `makeover-layout` 0.24.0's [`Track`](makeover_layout::Track), and the first
1189/// member here whose whole point is *position*. That makes the magnitude line
1190/// this crate keeps worth restating rather than assuming.
1191///
1192/// # Where the numbers come from
1193///
1194/// Every value that varies per item is a custom property the caller sets
1195/// inline, and every rule here reads one. `--track-at` and `--track-for` are
1196/// percentages of the span, which
1197/// [`Track::fraction`](makeover_layout::Track::fraction) computes once so three
1198/// renderers cannot disagree about it. Nothing here knows a pixel.
1199///
1200/// That is what lets the stylesheet stay static while the items move: an entry
1201/// carries `style="--track-at: 37.5%; --track-for: 4.166%"` and the rule below
1202/// turns it into a box. The alternative was emitting a rule per item, which is
1203/// a stylesheet that grows with the data.
1204///
1205/// **The height of the track is the app's**, not this crate's. 96 quarter-hour
1206/// slots at some slot height is a size, and a size is `makeover-geometry`'s
1207/// question -- the same refusal `figure_rules` and `placeholder_rules` make.
1208/// Percentages need a resolved height above them, so `.track` gets
1209/// `position: relative` and nothing else; the app says how tall a day is.
1210///
1211/// # Overlap
1212///
1213/// Two things at the same time is intrinsic to an axis and has no analogue in a
1214/// list. The description does not declare it -- `Placement::overlaps` derives it
1215/// from the times -- so what arrives here is a lane index and a lane count, and
1216/// the rule divides the width. A renderer that would rather stack them ignores
1217/// both properties and the defaults give it one full-width lane.
1218fn track_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1219 let track = class("track", opts);
1220 let slot = class("track-slot", opts);
1221 let tick = class("track-tick", opts);
1222 let entry = class("track-entry", opts);
1223 let mut css = String::new();
1224
1225 // The positioning context every entry resolves against, and the whole of
1226 // what this crate says about the container. No height: see the doc above.
1227 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{track} {{\n position: relative;\n}}");
1228
1229 // Gridlines and the ruler are the axis reading itself back, which is
1230 // `picture-caption` and `showing-position`'s claim: about the thing rather
1231 // than one of the things.
1232 //
1233 // `border_width` rather than a literal, the way `depth_rule` writes its
1234 // edge. A gridline is the one place a timeline would most naturally reach
1235 // for a hardcoded 1px, and a hardcoded 1px is this crate naming a size.
1236 let _ = writeln!(
1237 css,
1238 ".{slot} {{\n border-top: {} solid var(--border);\n}}",
1239 opts.border_width
1240 );
1241 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{tick} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}");
1242
1243 // The one rule that does real work. Top and height are the placement;
1244 // left and width are the lane. Both lane properties default so an entry
1245 // that names neither is full width, which is the common case and the one a
1246 // renderer gets for free.
1247 let _ = writeln!(
1248 css,
1249 ".{entry} {{\n \
1250 position: absolute;\n \
1251 top: var(--track-at, 0%);\n \
1252 height: var(--track-for, 100%);\n \
1253 left: calc(var(--track-lane, 0) / var(--track-lanes, 1) * 100%);\n \
1254 width: calc(100% / var(--track-lanes, 1));\n\
1255 }}"
1256 );
1257
1258 css
1259}
1260
1261/// A region's stand-in, and the header of a table that can be reordered.
1262///
1263/// Both are 0.12.0 members and both are colour and affordance only, which is
1264/// where `figure_rules` landed after trying to emit a type scale. How much room
1265/// a stand-in gets is a size — goingson has the same one at three, as
1266/// `--compact`, `--dashboard` and `--padded` — and a size is
1267/// `makeover-geometry`'s question.
1268///
1269/// The caret is the one thing here that is neither colour nor affordance, and it
1270/// is a renderer's own expression rather than a value the description named:
1271/// `aria-sort` is what the table actually says, and this turns it into something
1272/// visible for everyone not using a screen reader. A terminal draws its own; an
1273/// immediate-mode painter draws its own.
1274fn state_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1275 let placeholder = class("placeholder", opts);
1276 let text = class("placeholder-text", opts);
1277 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1278 let mut css = String::new();
1279
1280 let _ = writeln!(
1281 css,
1282 ".{placeholder} > .{text} {{\n color: var(--content-muted);\n}}"
1283 );
1284 // Only the failure is toned. An empty list is the normal state of a new
1285 // install, and `Readiness::tone` is what says so.
1286 let _ = writeln!(
1287 css,
1288 ".{placeholder}[data-tone=\"{0}\"] > .{text} {{\n color: var(--{0});\n}}",
1289 Tone::Danger.token()
1290 );
1291
1292 // A header that reorders the table is a control, and the pointer is the
1293 // only part of saying so that is not the app's own type and spacing.
1294 let _ = writeln!(
1295 css,
1296 ".{heading}[data-sortable] {{\n cursor: pointer;\n}}"
1297 );
1298 // The caret carries its own leading space, the way `makeover-tui` and
1299 // `makeover-immediate` both write `" \u{25B2}"`. It used to be emitted bare,
1300 // and both apps that adopted the vocabulary had to put the gap back in their
1301 // own stylesheets on the same afternoon -- each having to work out first that
1302 // app CSS outranks this crate's cascade layer, so adding the space the
1303 // obvious way, as `content`, silently wins over the glyph and leaves the
1304 // heading with no caret at all. A consumer should not have to know that, and
1305 // with the space emitted here there is nothing left for one to add.
1306 //
1307 // Three states, three tones, on the convention in wiki
1308 // `three-tone-convention`. A column in force is `content`; a column offering
1309 // to reorder and not doing it now is `content-secondary`, because it still
1310 // answers a press; a column that is not sortable emits no caret at all and
1311 // takes nothing. The idle arm used to hide its glyph and reserve the box,
1312 // which cost a reflow-free press and said nothing. It draws now, and the
1313 // reservation stops being a thing to get right.
1314 //
1315 // The glyph is `Sort::glyph`, escaped rather than written: a CSS `content`
1316 // string cannot carry the character literally through this file's own
1317 // escaping, and spelling it here as well would put the third copy back that
1318 // `makeover-layout` 0.27.5 exists to remove.
1319 let _ = writeln!(
1320 css,
1321 ".{heading}[data-sortable]::after \
1322 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content-secondary);\n}}",
1323 css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())
1324 );
1325 for direction in [Sort::Ascending, Sort::Descending] {
1326 let _ = writeln!(
1327 css,
1328 ".{heading}[aria-sort=\"{}\"]::after \
1329 {{\n content: \" {}\";\n color: var(--content);\n}}",
1330 direction.as_str(),
1331 css_escape(direction.glyph())
1332 );
1333 }
1334 css
1335}
1336
1337/// The frame a table sits in.
1338///
1339/// # Why this is a CSS table and not the grid the rest of the module assumes
1340///
1341/// A grid row needs `grid-template-columns`, which has to name every column in
1342/// order, so it cannot be written without knowing the columns. That is what
1343/// [`list::narrowing_css`] is for, and it works: goingson builds `tables.css` in
1344/// its own `build.rs` out of it, and nothing here changes that.
1345///
1346/// It does not work for a table a *description* produced. Those columns are
1347/// known at render time rather than at build time, and the rules would have to
1348/// travel with the markup: a `<style>` element per table, which needs
1349/// `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` and so blocks the MNW server's standing plan to
1350/// drop it. The head is not an escape: a table swapped in by htmx after a
1351/// delete arrives as a fragment with no head at all.
1352///
1353/// A CSS table aligns its columns across rows knowing nothing about how many
1354/// there are, so there is no track list to emit and nothing per-table to carry.
1355/// The cost is that a described table cannot take a per-column fixed length,
1356/// which costs nothing today: [`Sizing`](list::Sizing) is looked up by column
1357/// name and a description carries no lengths to put in it, so every track a
1358/// described table could ask for is already content, fill or auto.
1359///
1360/// [`Priority`] hiding is unchanged in kind. It moves from a generated
1361/// `display: none` per dropped column to one rule per drop class, which is the
1362/// same fact addressed by class rather than by cutoff, and still never by
1363/// position.
1364fn table_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1365 let table = class("table", opts);
1366 let head = class("table-head", opts);
1367 let row = class("table-row", opts);
1368 let heading = class("table-heading", opts);
1369 let cell = class("cell", opts);
1370 let mut css = String::new();
1371
1372 let _ = writeln!(
1373 css,
1374 ".{table} {{\n display: table;\n width: 100%;\n}}"
1375 );
1376 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{head},\n.{row} {{\n display: table-row;\n}}");
1377 let _ = writeln!(css, ".{heading},\n.{cell} {{\n display: table-cell;\n}}");
1378
1379 // A content column shrinks to what is in it. `width: 1%` is how a CSS table
1380 // is told that: auto layout hands the slack to the columns that asked for
1381 // room, and a column asking for almost none gets what it needs and no more.
1382 // The `nowrap` is what stops it being given less by wrapping.
1383 let _ = writeln!(
1384 css,
1385 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n width: 1%;\n}}",
1386 class("cell-content", opts)
1387 );
1388
1389 // A fixed column has no length to be fixed to. The description carries none
1390 // and `Sizing` is not reachable from here, so it behaves as content: the
1391 // honest answer to a width nobody supplied, and the same one `Sizing::track`
1392 // gives it.
1393 let _ = writeln!(
1394 css,
1395 ".{} {{\n white-space: nowrap;\n}}",
1396 class("cell-fixed", opts)
1397 );
1398
1399 // Optional columns go at the narrowest class, secondary ones go with them,
1400 // which is the cutoff walk `kept_at` describes said as two media queries.
1401 // Essential columns have no rule at all, because never dropping is what not
1402 // being mentioned already means.
1403 for (size, drops) in [
1404 (
1405 SizeClass::Compact,
1406 &["cell-drops-first", "cell-drops-next"][..],
1407 ),
1408 (SizeClass::Medium, &["cell-drops-first"][..]),
1409 ] {
1410 let selectors: Vec<String> = drops
1411 .iter()
1412 .map(|drop| format!(".{}", class(drop, opts)))
1413 .collect();
1414 css.push_str(&gated(
1415 Some(&size.media_condition()),
1416 &format!("{} {{\n display: none;\n}}\n", selectors.join(",\n")),
1417 ));
1418 }
1419
1420 // What is inside a cell, which the table side could not say until
1421 // makeover-layout 0.14.0. Every cell was one `.cell` and one content
1422 // colour, so a button in a cell was painted as text -- the drift
1423 // `RowPart::intent` has prevented for list rows since 0.2.0 and prevented
1424 // for nothing here.
1425 //
1426 // The colour goes on `.cell-value` rather than on `.cell`, and that
1427 // placement is the whole fix. On the container it would cascade into the
1428 // tokens and the controls sitting beside the text, which is the bug said
1429 // in one rule; on the part that is text, it reaches text and stops.
1430 for part in [
1431 CellPart::Value,
1432 CellPart::Tokens,
1433 CellPart::Actions,
1434 CellPart::Link,
1435 ] {
1436 // Three of the four inherit, each for its own reason: a token carries
1437 // its own tone, an action is a control rather than text, and a link
1438 // takes the action colour from the anchor it is. `CellPart::intent`
1439 // says so by answering with the intent inheriting already gives, and
1440 // pinning that would be louder than saying nothing.
1441 //
1442 // Written as a skip-list rather than as a match on Value, so a member
1443 // added upstream gets its intent emitted rather than being silently
1444 // dropped. That is the same trade `part_class`'s fallback makes: land
1445 // plainly, never land as nothing.
1446 if !matches!(part, CellPart::Tokens | CellPart::Actions | CellPart::Link) {
1447 let _ = writeln!(
1448 css,
1449 ".{} {{\n color: var(--{});\n}}",
1450 class(cell_part_class(part), opts),
1451 part.intent()
1452 );
1453 }
1454 }
1455
1456 css
1457}
1458
1459/// The component layer: every named thing phase A emits.
1460///
1461/// No scrollbar track. It was on the phase A list and came off: eight lines of
1462/// `::-webkit-scrollbar` with no shape a terminal or an immediate-mode painter
1463/// would want handed to it, so it stays with the apps.
1464#[must_use]
1465pub fn component_rules(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1466 let mut css = String::new();
1467 css.push_str(&surface_rules(opts));
1468 css.push_str(&link_rules(opts));
1469 css.push_str(&token_rules(opts));
1470 css.push_str(&selector_rules(opts));
1471 css.push_str(&row_rules(opts));
1472 css.push_str(&progress_rules(opts));
1473 css.push_str(&figure_rules(opts));
1474 css.push_str(&picture_rules(opts));
1475 css.push_str(&showing_rules(opts));
1476 css.push_str(&track_rules(opts));
1477 css.push_str(&state_rules(opts));
1478 css.push_str(&table_rules(opts));
1479 css
1480}
1481
1482/// The whole phase-A stylesheet: properties, depth rules and components, in
1483/// [`CSS_LAYER`], under a generated-file banner.
1484///
1485/// The banner sits outside the layer, because a comment participates in no
1486/// cascade and a reader opening the file should see what it is before seeing
1487/// an at-rule.
1488#[must_use]
1489pub fn stylesheet(opts: &Emit) -> String {
1490 format!(
1491 "/* Generated by makeover-webview from makeover-layout. Do not edit.\n \
1492 Depth is a fill and an edge together; naming them apart is what let\n \
1493 them disagree. See the crate's README and wiki note makeover-layout.\n\n \
1494 Everything below is in the `{CSS_LAYER}` cascade layer. Declare the\n \
1495 order once in your own stylesheet, or this layer's position is decided\n \
1496 by whichever generated file the browser happens to see first:\n\n \
1497 @layer {CSS_LAYER}, base, components, responsive; */\n{}",
1498 in_css_layer(&format!(
1499 ":root {{\n{}}}\n\n{}\n{}",
1500 bevel_properties(opts),
1501 depth_rules(opts),
1502 component_rules(opts)
1503 ))
1504 )
1505}
1506
1507#[cfg(test)]
1508mod tests {
1509 use super::*;
1510 use makeover_layout::Edge;
1511
1512 #[test]
1513 fn the_emitted_bevel_matches_what_the_apps_already_hand_write() {
1514 // Balanced Breakfast's styles.css, verbatim. Adoption has to be a
1515 // deletion, not a redesign, or nobody will take it.
1516 let opts = Emit::default();
1517 assert_eq!(
1518 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts),
1519 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-light), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-dark)"
1520 );
1521 assert_eq!(
1522 bevel_shadow(Bevel::Inset, &opts),
1523 "inset 1px 1px 0 var(--bevel-dark), inset -1px -1px 0 var(--bevel-light)"
1524 );
1525 }
1526
1527 #[test]
1528 fn no_colour_ever_reaches_the_output() {
1529 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1530 assert!(!css.contains('#'), "a hex literal escaped into the CSS");
1531 assert!(
1532 !css.contains("rgb"),
1533 "a colour function escaped into the CSS"
1534 );
1535 // Every colour is named, never resolved.
1536 assert!(css.contains("var(--surface-raised)"));
1537 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-light)"));
1538 }
1539
1540 #[test]
1541 fn a_well_falls_back_through_css_rather_than_through_rust() {
1542 assert_eq!(
1543 fill_var(Fill::Well),
1544 "var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"
1545 );
1546 // Nothing else needs one.
1547 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Raised), "var(--surface-raised)");
1548 assert_eq!(fill_var(Fill::Page), "var(--surface-page)");
1549 }
1550
1551 #[test]
1552 fn raised_and_well_do_not_collapse_onto_each_other() {
1553 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1554 assert!(css.contains(".raised {"));
1555 assert!(css.contains(".well {"));
1556 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"));
1557 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"));
1558 }
1559
1560 /// The cast shadow is composed here from the tone `makeover` derives, so
1561 /// neither crate has to hold the other's numbers.
1562 ///
1563 /// It is a `:root` property and deliberately not a depth class. There is no
1564 /// `Depth::Overlay` in the description layer, and adding one would be a
1565 /// claim about what a screen means rather than about how it is painted;
1566 /// until something asks for it, a consumer names the property on the rule
1567 /// for the menu or the toast it already has.
1568 #[test]
1569 fn the_cast_shadow_is_a_root_property_not_a_depth() {
1570 let css = bevel_properties(&Emit::default());
1571 assert!(css.contains("--elevation-overlay:"));
1572 assert!(css.contains("var(--elevation)"));
1573 assert!(
1574 !depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("elevation"),
1575 "elevation is not a depth class"
1576 );
1577 }
1578
1579 #[test]
1580 fn the_cascade_carries_the_pressed_state() {
1581 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
1582 // The one thing this renderer gets free that the other two resolve by
1583 // hand, eighteen call sites deep in audiofiles' case. Asserted on a
1584 // named surface: pressing belongs to the control, not to the depth.
1585 assert!(css.contains(".card:active {"));
1586 assert!(css.contains(".button:active {"));
1587 }
1588
1589 #[test]
1590 fn the_depth_class_is_a_surface_and_not_a_control() {
1591 let css = depth_rules(&Emit::default());
1592 // The static surface the vocabulary was missing. Sixteen goingson
1593 // elements wore .card and cancelled its hover and press to get this,
1594 // because a raised object that is not pressable had no other spelling.
1595 for state in [":hover", ":active", ":focus-visible", ":disabled"] {
1596 assert!(
1597 !css.contains(&format!(".raised{state}")),
1598 "the depth class claimed {state}: {css}"
1599 );
1600 }
1601 assert!(css.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"), "still raised: {css}");
1602 }
1603
1604 #[test]
1605 fn pressing_moves_the_fill_and_not_only_the_edge() {
1606 // The decision-1 guard, and the regression that mattered: emitting the
1607 // bevel flip alone is what left goingson hand-writing `background:
1608 // var(--surface-sunken)` on .btn, .card and .tag/.badge alike, so none
1609 // of the three could be deleted.
1610 let pressed = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1611 assert!(pressed.contains(".button:active {"));
1612 assert!(
1613 pressed.contains("background: var(--surface-well, var(--surface-page))"),
1614 "pressed dropped its fill: {pressed}"
1615 );
1616 assert!(pressed.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
1617 }
1618
1619 #[test]
1620 fn pressed_takes_its_fill_from_the_description_not_from_the_app() {
1621 // goingson presses to --surface-sunken. The description says a pressed
1622 // raised region reads as a well, and makeover says outright that
1623 // surface-sunken cannot serve as one, so the app is the thing that
1624 // moves.
1625 //
1626 // Scoped to the pressed rules rather than to the whole sheet: since
1627 // makeover-layout 0.3.0 an unchosen tab is legitimately
1628 // --surface-sunken, so the token appearing somewhere in the output no
1629 // longer means the app's choice leaked in.
1630 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1631 let mut checked = 0;
1632 for rule in css.split("}\n") {
1633 if !rule.contains(":active") {
1634 continue;
1635 }
1636 checked += 1;
1637 assert!(
1638 !rule.contains("surface-sunken"),
1639 "a pressed rule took the app's fill: {rule}"
1640 );
1641 }
1642 assert!(checked > 0, "no pressed rules found to check");
1643 assert_eq!(
1644 Depth::Raised.pressed().fill(),
1645 Some(Fill::Well),
1646 "the description changed under us"
1647 );
1648 }
1649
1650 #[test]
1651 fn the_whole_stylesheet_is_emitted_in_the_family_layer() {
1652 // The point of 0.11.0. Unlayered normal declarations outrank every
1653 // named layer, so an app declaring `@layer base, components` loses
1654 // every rule it owns to this file until this file is layered too.
1655 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1656 assert!(css.contains(&format!("@layer {CSS_LAYER} {{")));
1657
1658 // Exactly one layer block, and nothing outside it but the banner.
1659 assert_eq!(css.matches("@layer").count(), 2, "banner names it once");
1660 let opened = css.find("@layer makeover {").expect("layer opens");
1661 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1662 let before_layer = css.lines().take(i).map(str::len).sum::<usize>() < opened;
1663 if before_layer || line.is_empty() {
1664 continue;
1665 }
1666 assert!(
1667 line.starts_with(" ") || line == "}" || line.starts_with(" "),
1668 "line outside the layer: {line:?}"
1669 );
1670 }
1671 }
1672
1673 #[test]
1674 fn the_generated_sheet_carries_no_trailing_whitespace() {
1675 // A checked-in generated file that a formatter wants to rewrite is a
1676 // diff every time somebody saves it.
1677 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1678 for (i, line) in css.lines().enumerate() {
1679 assert_eq!(line, line.trim_end(), "trailing whitespace on line {i}");
1680 }
1681 }
1682
1683 #[test]
1684 fn the_banner_tells_an_app_how_to_order_the_layer() {
1685 // Without a declared order the layer's position depends on which
1686 // generated file the browser sees first, which is not a contract.
1687 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1688 assert!(css.contains("@layer makeover, base, components, responsive;"));
1689 // And the banner is outside the layer, not a rule inside it.
1690 assert!(css.starts_with("/* Generated by makeover-webview"));
1691 }
1692
1693 #[test]
1694 fn a_primitive_owns_every_state_it_implies() {
1695 // The whole point of 0.10.0. Anything emitting a hover rule owes the
1696 // other three, or the consuming app supplies them by out-specifying a
1697 // rule it does not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW
1698 // server, and three focus rings that do not match.
1699 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1700 for selector in ["button", "card", "chip", "tab", "segment", "toggle"] {
1701 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:hover {{")), "{selector}");
1702 assert!(
1703 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:active {{")),
1704 "{selector}"
1705 );
1706 assert!(
1707 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:focus-visible {{")),
1708 "{selector} has no focus ring"
1709 );
1710 assert!(
1711 css.contains(&format!(".{selector}:disabled,")),
1712 "{selector} has no disabled state"
1713 );
1714 }
1715 }
1716
1717 #[test]
1718 fn a_field_takes_focus_and_refuses_input_without_taking_a_hover() {
1719 // A text field does not light up under the pointer, so it gets the two
1720 // states it has and not the two it does not.
1721 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1722 assert!(css.contains(".field:focus-visible {"));
1723 assert!(css.contains(".field:disabled,"));
1724 assert!(!css.contains(".field:hover {"));
1725 assert!(!css.contains(".field:active {"));
1726 }
1727
1728 #[test]
1729 fn disabled_is_emitted_after_hover_so_source_order_settles_it() {
1730 // Every one of these selectors is specificity (0,2,0), so nothing but
1731 // order decides which wins. A disabled button taking the hover fill is
1732 // the exact bug goingson's `.button:disabled:hover` was written to fix,
1733 // and the reason it had to reach (0,3,0) to do it.
1734 let css = interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1735 let hover = css.find(":hover").expect("hover");
1736 let active = css.find(":active").expect("active");
1737 let focus = css.find(":focus-visible").expect("focus");
1738 let disabled = css.find(":disabled").expect("disabled");
1739 assert!(hover < active && active < focus && focus < disabled);
1740
1741 // And it restores the surface, or the hover fill survives underneath.
1742 let tail = &css[disabled..];
1743 assert!(tail.contains("background: var(--surface-raised)"));
1744 }
1745
1746 #[test]
1747 fn a_disabled_state_reaches_things_that_cannot_be_disabled() {
1748 // `:disabled` matches form elements only, and a chip is a div. Keying
1749 // on the ARIA attribute too is the pattern the invalid field already
1750 // set: one fact, read by the styling and the accessibility tree alike.
1751 let css = disabled_rule("chip", Depth::Raised);
1752 assert!(css.contains(".chip:disabled,"));
1753 assert!(css.contains(".chip[aria-disabled=\"true\"]"));
1754 assert!(css.contains("cursor: not-allowed"));
1755 }
1756
1757 #[test]
1758 fn the_focus_ring_does_not_disturb_the_bevel_it_lands_on() {
1759 // `outline` has its own property, so unlike the invalid ring there is
1760 // no bevel to restate beside it and nothing to keep in agreement.
1761 let opts = Emit::default();
1762 let css = focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts);
1763 assert!(css.contains("outline: 2px solid var(--focus-ring)"));
1764 assert!(!css.contains("box-shadow"), "the ring restated the bevel");
1765 }
1766
1767 #[test]
1768 fn a_well_takes_the_ring_inside_and_a_raised_surface_outside() {
1769 // One ring, placed by depth. The offset comes off `Depth::bevel` and
1770 // not off a per-component choice, which is what gave three apps three
1771 // different rings.
1772 let opts = Emit::default();
1773 assert!(focus_rule("field", Depth::Well, &opts).contains("outline-offset: calc(-1 * 2px)"));
1774 assert!(focus_rule("button", Depth::Raised, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
1775 // Nothing to sit inside of, so it sits outside.
1776 assert!(focus_rule("badge", Depth::Sunken, &opts).contains("outline-offset: 2px"));
1777
1778 // And the ring is not the bevel. Reusing border_width emitted a 1px
1779 // ring that every consumer had already overridden.
1780 assert_ne!(opts.focus_width, opts.border_width);
1781 }
1782
1783 #[test]
1784 fn hover_is_gated_on_capability_and_the_keyboard_path_is_not() {
1785 // goingson's section 60 exists only to take back the hover state this
1786 // crate handed it. Gating at the source is what deletes that section
1787 // in all three apps rather than having each fight for it.
1788 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1789 let condition = format!("@media {}", Density::Pointer.media_condition());
1790 assert!(css.contains(&condition));
1791
1792 // What is gated is every hover state the surfaces carry. The row's
1793 // actions used to be the other half of this test and are not gated any
1794 // more, because they are not hidden any more: a rule that reveals
1795 // nothing needs no capability answer.
1796 let gated: Vec<&str> = css.lines().filter(|line| line.contains(":hover")).collect();
1797 assert!(!gated.is_empty(), "{css}");
1798 for line in gated {
1799 let indent = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
1800 assert!(indent > 4, "an ungated hover rule: {line}");
1801 }
1802 assert!(!css.contains(".row:hover"), "{css}");
1803 }
1804
1805 #[test]
1806 fn the_capability_answer_is_asked_for_and_not_assumed() {
1807 // Both halves come from the crates that own them. If `makeover-touch`
1808 // ever says a fingertip has hover, this stops gating on its own.
1809 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, SizeClass::Compact));
1810 assert!(Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Pointer, SizeClass::Compact));
1811 assert_eq!(hover_condition(), Some(Density::Pointer.media_condition()));
1812
1813 // And the size class passed to that call is not a claim about width.
1814 assert!(Affordance::Hover.reads_density());
1815 for size in [SizeClass::Compact, SizeClass::Medium, SizeClass::Expanded] {
1816 assert!(!Affordance::Hover.available(Density::Touch, size));
1817 }
1818 }
1819
1820 #[test]
1821 fn hover_resolves_against_the_token_makeover_already_derives() {
1822 let css = interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default());
1823 assert!(css.contains(".card:hover {"));
1824 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--hover-surface)"));
1825 // Not the app's choice, which was --surface-overlay.
1826 assert!(!css.contains("surface-overlay"));
1827 }
1828
1829 #[test]
1830 fn a_badge_gets_no_edge_and_no_fill() {
1831 // Decision 2, and the one visible redesign in phase A. Token::Badge is
1832 // Flat: an edge on a label says it can be pressed.
1833 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1834 let badge = css
1835 .lines()
1836 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".badge {"))
1837 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1838 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1839 .join("\n");
1840 assert!(!badge.contains("box-shadow"), "badge kept an edge: {badge}");
1841 assert!(!badge.contains("background"), "badge kept a fill: {badge}");
1842 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
1843 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
1844 }
1845
1846 #[test]
1847 fn a_badge_carries_a_tone_and_neutral_is_the_bare_class() {
1848 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1849 // Neutral is the absence of a status, not a status named "none".
1850 assert!(css.contains(".badge {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
1851 assert!(!css.contains("data-tone=\"content-muted\""));
1852 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
1853 assert!(
1854 css.contains(&format!(".badge[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
1855 "missing tone {tone}"
1856 );
1857 assert!(css.contains(&format!("color: var(--{tone})")));
1858 }
1859 }
1860
1861 #[test]
1862 fn a_chip_is_raised_and_latches_into_a_well() {
1863 let css = token_rules(&Emit::default());
1864 assert!(css.contains(".chip {"));
1865 assert!(css.contains(".chip.latched {"));
1866 assert!(css.contains(".chip:active {"));
1867 // The whole difference from a badge: it answers a click.
1868 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
1869 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
1870 }
1871
1872 #[test]
1873 fn only_a_tab_comes_forward_when_chosen() {
1874 // The folder semantic. Collapsing the three selectors would lose it.
1875 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1876 assert!(css.contains(".tab.chosen {"));
1877 assert!(css.contains(".segment.chosen {"));
1878 assert!(css.contains(".toggle.chosen {"));
1879 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
1880 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1881 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1882
1883 let tab = css
1884 .lines()
1885 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".tab.chosen {"))
1886 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
1887 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
1888 .join("\n");
1889 assert!(
1890 tab.contains("var(--bevel-raised)"),
1891 "tab was held in: {tab}"
1892 );
1893 }
1894
1895 #[test]
1896 fn an_unchosen_tab_recedes_without_looking_picked() {
1897 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1898 // Recessed by colour and given no edge. An edge would make every option
1899 // look picked; flat would leave the chosen one nothing to come forward
1900 // from, which is the gap makeover-layout 0.3.0 closed.
1901 assert!(
1902 css.contains(".tab {\n background: var(--surface-sunken);\n}"),
1903 "unchosen tab is not recessed: {css}"
1904 );
1905 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
1906 assert!(css.contains(".tab:hover {"));
1907 }
1908
1909 #[test]
1910 fn a_segment_stands_up_so_the_chosen_one_can_be_held_in() {
1911 // The inverse of the tab, and why the three selectors are not one
1912 // member with a flag.
1913 let css = selector_rules(&Emit::default());
1914 assert!(css.contains(".segment {\n background: var(--surface-raised);"));
1915 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
1916 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
1917 }
1918
1919 #[test]
1920 fn a_rows_actions_are_shown_at_rest() {
1921 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1922
1923 // The hover reveal is gone, and with it every escape it needed. What
1924 // it hid was hidden from pointer users alone, who are the ones
1925 // scanning a list to learn what can be done to a row.
1926 assert!(!css.contains("opacity"), "{css}");
1927 assert!(!css.contains("pointer-events"), "{css}");
1928 assert!(!css.contains(":hover"), "{css}");
1929 assert!(!css.contains(":focus-within"), "{css}");
1930
1931 // Nor is it hidden any other way. `display: none` would reflow the row
1932 // and `visibility: hidden` would take the actions out of the focus
1933 // order; the point is that neither is reached for.
1934 assert!(!css.contains("display: none"), "{css}");
1935 assert!(!css.contains("visibility:"), "{css}");
1936 }
1937
1938 #[test]
1939 fn a_figures_tone_lands_on_the_delta_when_there_is_one() {
1940 // 0.13.0. The delta is the part that reads as good or bad; the number
1941 // itself is an ordinary fact. A figure with no delta has nowhere else to
1942 // put the colour, so the value takes it, and `:has` is what lets one
1943 // attribute mean both without the emitter choosing an element.
1944 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
1945
1946 assert!(
1947 css.contains(".figure[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-change"),
1948 "{css}"
1949 );
1950 assert!(
1951 css.contains(
1952 ".figure[data-tone=\"success\"]:not(:has(> .figure-change)) > .figure-value"
1953 ),
1954 "{css}"
1955 );
1956 // The caption is the noun and never takes the tone.
1957 assert!(
1958 !css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] > .figure-caption"),
1959 "{css}"
1960 );
1961 }
1962
1963 #[test]
1964 fn the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits() {
1965 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1966 assert!(css.contains(".row-primary {\n color: var(--content);"));
1967 assert!(css.contains(".row-secondary {\n color: var(--content-secondary);"));
1968 assert!(css.contains(".row-meta {\n color: var(--content-muted);"));
1969 // Actions carry controls, not text. Pinning the colour it would inherit
1970 // anyway is louder than saying nothing.
1971 assert!(!css.contains(".row-actions {\n color:"));
1972 }
1973
1974 #[test]
1975 fn the_token_strip_takes_no_colour_of_its_own() {
1976 // makeover-layout 0.9.0. A token carries its own tone, so a colour on
1977 // the strip would be a rule fighting the things sitting in it -- the
1978 // same reasoning as actions, reached for a different reason.
1979 let css = row_rules(&Emit::default());
1980 assert!(!css.contains(".row-tokens {\n color:"));
1981 }
1982
1983 #[test]
1984 fn an_unknown_row_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
1985 // What `#[non_exhaustive]` bought and what it cost. `part_class` can no
1986 // longer be exhaustive, so a member added upstream lands as a bare
1987 // class with no rule instead of stopping the build. Asserting the
1988 // fallback exists is what keeps it from being written as `unreachable!`
1989 // by someone who reads the match as closed.
1990 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Tokens), "row-tokens");
1991 assert_eq!(part_class(RowPart::Meta), "row-meta");
1992 }
1993
1994 #[test]
1995 fn a_link_takes_the_action_colour_the_theme_actually_defines() {
1996 // `--action-primary` shipped here for months and no theme has ever
1997 // defined it, so every `.link` dropped its colour declaration outright
1998 // and fell back to inherited text. Nothing caught it because the sheet
1999 // is valid CSS either way; MNW's no-undefined-token lint is what found
2000 // it, 2026-08-14. The hover arm two lines below was always `--action-hover`,
2001 // which is what makes the typo legible in hindsight.
2002 let css = link_rules(&Emit::default());
2003 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action);"));
2004 assert!(!css.contains("--action-primary"));
2005 assert!(css.contains("color: var(--action-hover);"));
2006 }
2007
2008 #[test]
2009 fn the_progress_trough_is_a_well() {
2010 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2011 assert!(css.contains(".progress {"));
2012 assert!(css.contains("box-shadow: var(--bevel-inset)"));
2013 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {"));
2014 assert!(css.contains("background: var(--action)"));
2015 // A bare `.fill` would catch things that have nothing to do with
2016 // progress once the sheet lands unprefixed.
2017 assert!(!css.contains("> .fill "));
2018 }
2019
2020 #[test]
2021 fn a_progress_bar_can_carry_a_tone_and_defaults_to_action() {
2022 let css = progress_rules(&Emit::default());
2023 // Untoned is --action, not Tone::Neutral's content-muted: a bar with no
2024 // status is still reporting progress, and muted would read as disabled.
2025 assert!(css.contains(".progress > .progress-fill {\n background: var(--action);"));
2026 assert!(!css.contains("progress-fill {\n color: var(--content-muted)"));
2027 for tone in ["info", "success", "warning", "danger"] {
2028 assert!(
2029 css.contains(&format!(".progress > .progress-fill[data-tone=\"{tone}\"]")),
2030 "missing progress tone {tone}"
2031 );
2032 }
2033 // goingson's two live cases, which is why the tones are emitted at all.
2034 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"success\"] {\n background: var(--success);"));
2035 assert!(css.contains("[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background: var(--danger);"));
2036 }
2037
2038 #[test]
2039 fn no_scrollbar_track_is_emitted() {
2040 // Decision 3's negative half. It was on the phase A list and came off;
2041 // this is what stops it drifting back in.
2042 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2043 assert!(!css.contains("scrollbar"));
2044 assert!(!css.contains("::-webkit"));
2045 }
2046
2047 #[test]
2048 fn an_invalid_field_is_ringed_without_being_lit() {
2049 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2050 assert!(css.contains(".field {"));
2051 // The ARIA attribute, not a class: one fact, read by both the visual
2052 // and the accessible state, so they cannot drift.
2053 assert!(css.contains(".field[aria-invalid=\"true\"] {"));
2054 assert!(!css.contains(".field.invalid"));
2055 // A flat ring: this edge says "wrong", and a two-tone bevel would have
2056 // it say "raised" at the same time.
2057 assert!(css.contains("0 0 0 1px var(--danger)"));
2058 }
2059
2060 #[test]
2061 fn an_invalid_field_keeps_the_well_underneath_it() {
2062 // box-shadow is not additive. A lone ring replaces the bevel and drops
2063 // the well out from under the field, which is what this emitted before
2064 // 0.5.0 and is the whole reason the rule composes.
2065 let css = surface_rules(&Emit::default());
2066 let invalid = css
2067 .lines()
2068 .skip_while(|l| !l.starts_with(".field[aria-invalid"))
2069 .take_while(|l| !l.starts_with('}'))
2070 .collect::<Vec<_>>()
2071 .join("\n");
2072 assert!(
2073 invalid.contains("var(--bevel-inset)"),
2074 "the well was dropped: {invalid}"
2075 );
2076 assert!(invalid.contains("var(--danger)"));
2077 }
2078
2079 #[test]
2080 fn button_and_card_come_out_identical_by_construction() {
2081 // The duplication phase A deletes. They are the same composition, so
2082 // the only honest way to emit both is from one call.
2083 let opts = Emit::default();
2084 let css = surface_rules(&opts);
2085 assert_eq!(
2086 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised),
2087 depth_declarations(Depth::Raised)
2088 );
2089 assert!(css.contains(".button {"));
2090 assert!(css.contains(".card {"));
2091 assert_eq!(
2092 interactive_rules("button", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default()).replace("button", "card"),
2093 interactive_rules("card", Depth::Raised, &Emit::default())
2094 );
2095 }
2096
2097 #[test]
2098 fn a_prefix_reaches_the_component_classes_too() {
2099 let opts = Emit {
2100 class_prefix: "mo-",
2101 ..Emit::default()
2102 };
2103 let css = stylesheet(&opts);
2104 for name in [
2105 "mo-button",
2106 "mo-card",
2107 "mo-field",
2108 "mo-badge",
2109 "mo-chip",
2110 "mo-tab",
2111 "mo-row-primary",
2112 "mo-progress",
2113 "mo-progress-fill",
2114 ] {
2115 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}")), "unprefixed: {name}");
2116 }
2117 // The bare names must be gone entirely, or a prefixed build still
2118 // collides with the app's own stylesheet.
2119 assert!(!css.contains(".button {"));
2120 assert!(!css.contains(".card {"));
2121 assert!(!css.contains(".badge {"));
2122 }
2123
2124 #[test]
2125 fn the_class_a_renderer_puts_on_an_option_is_the_one_the_rules_key_off() {
2126 // `option_class` is the contract a screen renderer writes markup
2127 // against, and the rules below are the other half of it. They come off
2128 // one mapping now, so this asserts the mapping is the one that reaches
2129 // the stylesheet rather than that two lists still agree.
2130 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2131 for selector in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2132 let name = option_class(selector);
2133 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name} {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2134 assert!(css.contains(&format!(".{name}.chosen {{")), "{name}: {css}");
2135 }
2136 assert_eq!(option_class(Selector::Tabs), "tab");
2137 }
2138
2139 #[test]
2140 fn the_caret_brings_its_own_gap_and_is_the_glyph_the_description_names() {
2141 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2142
2143 // The space is inside the glyph, which is what the other two renderers
2144 // write. Emitted bare, every consumer has to add it back, and the
2145 // obvious way to add it -- `content` in an app stylesheet, which is
2146 // unlayered and so outranks this sheet -- deletes the caret instead.
2147 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25B2\";"), "{css}");
2148 assert!(css.contains("content: \" \\25BC\";"), "{css}");
2149 assert!(!css.contains("content: \"\\2"), "{css}");
2150
2151 // The arrows this renderer used to draw alone are gone. Composition
2152 // rather than agreement: the glyph comes from `Sort::glyph`, so a
2153 // fourth spelling cannot appear here without appearing everywhere.
2154 assert!(!css.contains("2191") && !css.contains("2193"), "{css}");
2155 assert!(css.contains(&css_escape(Sort::Ascending.glyph())), "{css}");
2156
2157 // Three states, three tones. An idle sortable heading draws its caret
2158 // now rather than reserving a hidden box for it, so there is no
2159 // visibility to order and no reflow left to guard against; what
2160 // separates the states is the colour, and the sorted arms come after
2161 // the idle one because the specificity is the same.
2162 let idle = css
2163 .find(".table-heading[data-sortable]::after")
2164 .expect("the idle caret is emitted");
2165 let sorted = css
2166 .find(".table-heading[aria-sort=\"ascending\"]::after")
2167 .expect("the ascending caret is emitted");
2168 assert!(idle < sorted, "{css}");
2169 assert!(
2170 css[idle..sorted].contains("color: var(--content-secondary);"),
2171 "{css}"
2172 );
2173 assert!(css[sorted..].contains("color: var(--content);"), "{css}");
2174 assert!(!css.contains("visibility: hidden;"), "{css}");
2175 }
2176
2177 #[test]
2178 fn a_destructive_button_has_somewhere_for_its_tone_to_land() {
2179 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2180
2181 for tone in [Tone::Info, Tone::Success, Tone::Warning, Tone::Danger] {
2182 assert!(
2183 css.contains(&format!(".button[data-tone=\"{}\"]", tone.token())),
2184 "{css}"
2185 );
2186 }
2187 // Colour, not a fill. A red surface is an app's decision about emphasis.
2188 assert!(!css.contains(".button[data-tone=\"danger\"] {\n background"));
2189 }
2190
2191 #[test]
2192 fn a_described_list_is_not_a_bulleted_list() {
2193 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2194 assert!(css.contains(".list {\n list-style: none;"), "{css}");
2195 }
2196
2197 #[test]
2198 fn a_table_lays_itself_out_without_being_told_its_columns() {
2199 // The whole point of the CSS table. A described table's columns are
2200 // known at render time, so anything the stylesheet has to be told about
2201 // them would have to travel with the markup.
2202 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2203
2204 assert!(css.contains(".table {\n display: table;"), "{css}");
2205 assert!(css.contains("display: table-row;"), "{css}");
2206 assert!(css.contains("display: table-cell;"), "{css}");
2207 assert!(!css.contains("grid-template-columns"), "{css}");
2208 }
2209
2210 #[test]
2211 fn a_control_in_a_cell_is_not_painted_as_text() {
2212 // The point of makeover-layout 0.14.0's CellPart, and the table-side
2213 // twin of `the_three_text_parts_take_their_intents_and_actions_inherits`
2214 // above. One `.cell` and one content colour meant a button in a cell
2215 // inherited it.
2216 let css = table_rules(&Emit::default());
2217
2218 assert!(
2219 css.contains(".cell-value {\n color: var(--content);"),
2220 "{css}"
2221 );
2222 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-actions {\n color:"), "{css}");
2223 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-tokens {\n color:"), "{css}");
2224 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-link {\n color:"), "{css}");
2225
2226 // The colour is on the part that is text, never on the container. On
2227 // `.cell` it would cascade into the three parts that are not text,
2228 // which is the bug written as one rule.
2229 assert!(!css.contains(".cell {\n color:"), "{css}");
2230 }
2231
2232 #[test]
2233 fn an_unknown_cell_part_renders_plainly_rather_than_failing_to_build() {
2234 // `part_class`'s obligation, taken on for the table side too. CellPart
2235 // is `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a member added upstream must land as a
2236 // bare class rather than as a build that stops.
2237 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Value), "cell-value");
2238 assert_eq!(cell_part_class(CellPart::Actions), "cell-actions");
2239 }
2240
2241 #[test]
2242 fn a_column_drops_by_its_priority_and_never_by_its_position() {
2243 let css = component_rules(&Emit::default());
2244
2245 // Optional goes at the narrowest class and secondary goes with it,
2246 // which is `kept_at`'s cutoff walk said as two queries.
2247 let compact = css
2248 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Compact.media_condition()))
2249 .expect("a compact query");
2250 let medium = css
2251 .find(&format!("@media {}", SizeClass::Medium.media_condition()))
2252 .expect("a medium query");
2253 assert!(css[compact..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2254 assert!(!css[medium..].contains(".cell-drops-next"), "{css}");
2255
2256 // Essential columns are never mentioned, because not being mentioned is
2257 // already what never dropping means.
2258 assert!(!css.contains(".cell-keeps"), "{css}");
2259
2260 // And nothing counts. `nth-child` is the bug the priority vocabulary
2261 // exists to end.
2262 assert!(!css.contains("nth-child"), "{css}");
2263 }
2264
2265 #[test]
2266 fn a_track_places_by_custom_property_and_never_by_a_size() {
2267 let css = track_rules(&Emit::default());
2268
2269 // Placement arrives from the caller, computed once by Track::fraction.
2270 // If either of these becomes a literal, three renderers have started
2271 // disagreeing about where 09:30 is.
2272 assert!(css.contains("top: var(--track-at"), "{css}");
2273 assert!(css.contains("height: var(--track-for"), "{css}");
2274
2275 // Overlap lanes default so an entry naming neither is full width.
2276 assert!(css.contains("--track-lane, 0"), "{css}");
2277 assert!(css.contains("--track-lanes, 1"), "{css}");
2278
2279 // The refusal that matters. A slot height here would be this crate
2280 // deciding how tall a quarter of an hour is, which is the thing
2281 // makeover-geometry owns and the reason `.track` gets no height at all.
2282 assert!(!css.contains("height: var(--track-slot"), "{css}");
2283 for size in ["px", "rem", "em", "vh"] {
2284 let bare = css
2285 .lines()
2286 .filter(|l| !l.contains("var(--"))
2287 .any(|l| l.contains(size));
2288 assert!(!bare, "track_rules named a {size} outside a var(): {css}");
2289 }
2290 }
2291
2292 #[test]
2293 fn the_whole_sheet_still_names_every_colour() {
2294 // The crate's founding property, asserted over the component layer and
2295 // not only the primitives.
2296 let css = stylesheet(&Emit::default());
2297 assert!(!css.contains('#'));
2298 assert!(!css.contains("rgb"));
2299 for line in css.lines() {
2300 // Declarations only: a selector or an at-rule can carry a colon of
2301 // its own (`:root`, `:hover`, `@media (hover: hover)`) and declares
2302 // nothing. Keyed on the trailing semicolon rather than on leading
2303 // indentation, which only ever worked as a proxy for nesting depth
2304 // and stopped when the sheet gained a cascade layer around it.
2305 let trimmed = line.trim();
2306 if !trimmed.ends_with(';') {
2307 continue;
2308 }
2309 let Some((_, value)) = trimmed.split_once(": ") else {
2310 continue;
2311 };
2312 if value.contains("var(--") {
2313 continue;
2314 }
2315 // Everything left has to be a keyword, a number or a
2316 // caller-supplied length, never a colour.
2317 //
2318 // The length arm is what the comment above always claimed and the
2319 // list never covered: `border_width` arrives from `Emit` and lands
2320 // bare in the focus ring's offset, where the bevel had only ever
2321 // used it inside an `inset` shadow.
2322 let opts = Emit::default();
2323 assert!(
2324 value.contains("inset")
2325 || value.contains(opts.border_width)
2326 || value.contains(opts.focus_width)
2327 // 0.12.0's two: a sortable header is a control and says so
2328 // with the pointer, and the caret is this renderer's own
2329 // expression of `aria-sort`. Neither is a colour, which is
2330 // what this test is actually about, and neither is a size,
2331 // which is the other thing this crate must not name. The
2332 // leading space inside the glyph is the same thing the other
2333 // two renderers write into theirs, so it is part of the
2334 // caret rather than spacing this crate decided on.
2335 || value
2336 .trim_start_matches('"')
2337 .trim_start()
2338 .starts_with("\\2")
2339 || matches!(
2340 value.trim_end_matches(';'),
2341 "0" | "1"
2342 | "none"
2343 | "auto"
2344 | "not-allowed"
2345 | "pointer"
2346 // The caret's reserved box. Visibility is presence,
2347 // not magnitude and not colour.
2348 | "hidden"
2349 | "visible"
2350 // The link's two signals. `underline` is a line and
2351 // `inherit` defers to whatever the app set, so
2352 // neither names a colour or a magnitude.
2353 | "underline"
2354 | "inherit"
2355 // The table frame. `display` is structure and not a
2356 // size; `nowrap` is what makes a content column
2357 // content. The two widths are the awkward pair and
2358 // they are still not sizes: `100%` is "all of
2359 // whatever you were given" and `1%` is the CSS
2360 // table idiom for "shrink to fit", which is a
2361 // behaviour spelled as a number because CSS has no
2362 // keyword for it. Neither names a magnitude, which
2363 // is the thing this crate leaves to
2364 // makeover-geometry.
2365 | "table"
2366 | "table-row"
2367 | "table-cell"
2368 | "nowrap"
2369 | "100%"
2370 | "1%"
2371 // The time axis, 0.42.0. `position` is the one
2372 // property whose whole job is where a thing sits,
2373 // which is exactly what this crate spent its life
2374 // refusing to say -- so it is worth being exact
2375 // about why these two are not that refusal
2376 // breaking.
2377 //
2378 // Neither names a magnitude. `relative` says the
2379 // track is what its entries resolve against, and
2380 // `absolute` says an entry is placed rather than
2381 // flowed. *Where* each entry lands is
2382 // `--track-at` and `--track-for`, custom
2383 // properties the caller sets from
2384 // `Track::fraction`, and they are skipped by the
2385 // `var(--` arm above like every other value this
2386 // crate refuses to decide.
2387 //
2388 // The rule that would break the refusal is a slot
2389 // height, and there is none: the track's height is
2390 // the app's, so the percentages have something to
2391 // resolve against and this crate still never says
2392 // how tall a day is.
2393 | "relative"
2394 | "absolute"
2395 // A picture's three, 0.36.0. `block` is structure
2396 // for the reason `table` is: an inline image sits
2397 // on the baseline and carries a descender's worth
2398 // of space under it, which is a fact about
2399 // replaced elements rather than a size this crate
2400 // chose. `cover` and `contain` are `Fit`'s two
2401 // named members reaching CSS unchanged, which is
2402 // an intent arriving rather than a value being
2403 // picked.
2404 | "block"
2405 | "cover"
2406 | "contain"
2407 ),
2408 "unrecognised literal value: {line}"
2409 );
2410 }
2411 }
2412
2413 #[test]
2414 fn flat_emits_nothing_at_all() {
2415 assert_eq!(depth_class(Depth::Flat, &Emit::default()), None);
2416 assert!(!depth_rules(&Emit::default()).contains("flat"));
2417 }
2418
2419 #[test]
2420 fn a_prefix_namespaces_every_class() {
2421 let opts = Emit {
2422 class_prefix: "mo-",
2423 ..Emit::default()
2424 };
2425 let css = depth_rules(&opts);
2426 assert!(css.contains(".mo-raised {"));
2427 assert!(css.contains(".mo-well {"));
2428 assert!(!css.contains(".raised {"));
2429 }
2430
2431 #[test]
2432 fn the_border_width_is_the_callers() {
2433 let opts = Emit {
2434 border_width: "2px",
2435 ..Emit::default()
2436 };
2437 assert!(bevel_shadow(Bevel::Raised, &opts).contains("inset 2px 2px 0"));
2438 }
2439
2440 #[test]
2441 fn edges_agree_with_the_description() {
2442 // Not a tautology: it is the guard that a CSS-shaped convenience never
2443 // quietly reverses which side is lit.
2444 let (tl, br) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
2445 assert_eq!(tl.token(), Edge::Light.token());
2446 assert_eq!(br.token(), Edge::Dark.token());
2447 }
2448}