makeover_layout/lib.rs
1//! The renderer-agnostic half of the make-family design system.
2//!
3//! <!-- wiki: makeover-layout -->
4//!
5//! `makeover` answers *what colour*, and varies by theme. `makeover-geometry`
6//! answers *how much space*, and varies by density and surface. This crate
7//! answers *what the thing is*, and varies by nothing.
8//!
9//! # The deferral rule
10//!
11//! A description names intents and relationships, never values. Say
12//! [`Fill::Raised`], never `#D9DDF4`. Say `Gap::Peer`, never `6px`. What is
13//! left once colour and spacing are deferred is **composition**: which edges
14//! are lit, what inverts on press, what nests in what.
15//!
16//! The constraint that shapes all of it: a renderer that can only paint
17//! rectangles has to be able to express the result. egui has no
18//! `box-shadow: inset` and one stroke per widget with no per-side control; a
19//! terminal has box-drawing characters and one cell of resolution, and cannot
20//! draw a two-tone lit edge at all. A description that assumes per-side edges
21//! is a CSS description wearing a neutral name. So this crate names the
22//! *intent* — this region is a well — and each renderer chooses an expression
23//! it can actually produce, including dropping half of one.
24//!
25//! # Scope
26//!
27//! Depth came first: the bevel and the surfaces it shapes. That much was
28//! settled the hard way — the vocabulary here was read off audiofiles'
29//! `ui::theme` and `ui::widgets`, which are the only implementation written
30//! by a consumer with no CSS, then checked against both webview apps. All
31//! three agreed once Balanced Breakfast's fills were corrected.
32//!
33//! 0.2.0 adds the rest of the description, each member drawn the same way,
34//! from what the three apps already hand-write rather than from a taxonomy:
35//!
36//! - Components. [`Token`] (badge against chip), [`Notice`] (toast against
37//! banner), [`RowPart`], [`Heading`], [`Selector`], [`Readiness`], and
38//! [`Tone`], which is the one intent family they share.
39//! - Schemas. [`Field`] for forms and [`Column`] for lists and tables.
40//! - Structure. [`Region`] for the parts of a screen, [`Arrangement`] for how
41//! a screen is put together.
42//!
43//! **Validation** was absent on purpose here, on the grounds that neither app
44//! had a shared story. That reasoning is retired — see 0.11.0 below, which is
45//! where the constraints arrived and why the argument did not survive contact
46//! with what the apps were measured to do.
47//!
48//! 0.3.0 closes a gap the first real adoption found, which is what adopting
49//! against goingson first was for. [`Selector`] described only the *chosen*
50//! option, so an unchosen one fell through to [`Depth::Flat`] and no renderer
51//! drew it; goingson's tab strip recesses its unchosen tabs by hand and could
52//! not delete the line, because being recessed is *why* the chosen tab reads as
53//! coming forward. So [`Selector::unchosen`] joins `chosen`, and saying it
54//! needed [`Fill::Sunken`] and [`Depth::Sunken`]: a surface set back by colour
55//! with no edge, which is neither a well nor level-with.
56//!
57//! 0.7.0 adds [`State`], the interaction axis, closing the gap that adopting
58//! against three apps rather than one made visible. The description named
59//! rest and, through [`Depth::pressed`], pressed. It named neither focus nor
60//! disabled, so `makeover-webview` emitted a hover rule and stopped, and each
61//! consumer completed the primitive from outside by out-specifying a rule it
62//! did not own: 19 such rules in goingson, 21 in the MNW server, a further set
63//! in Balanced Breakfast, and three focus rings that do not match. The axis is
64//! deliberately two members wide, because hover and pressed belong where they
65//! already are. [`State`]'s own docs carry that argument.
66//!
67//! 0.8.0 finishes [`Field`], which described a field well enough to label it and
68//! not well enough to draw it. Writing `makeover-webview`'s form emitter found
69//! three things missing and the renderer supplied all three from outside: the
70//! current value, a select's options, and the placeholder. Two of those move
71//! here and one does not.
72//!
73//! - [`Field::placeholder`] is user-facing text sitting beside `label` and
74//! `hint`. There was never a reading on which it was renderer state; it was
75//! outside only because adding a field to a published struct is breaking.
76//! - [`Field::options`] moves because every renderer needs them and each was
77//! going to invent its own shape. [`Choice`] is the shape `makeover-webview`
78//! already arrived at, taken as-is rather than redesigned.
79//! - The current value stays renderer-side and is not coming here. It is the
80//! one of the three that is genuinely state: a webview reads it out of the
81//! DOM, an immediate-mode renderer holds a `&mut` to the app's own field, and
82//! a description that carried it would be a form model.
83//!
84//! 0.9.0 opens [`RowPart`], which was the last closed enum in the vocabulary,
85//! and adds [`RowPart::Tokens`]. Both halves come from the same finding, made
86//! by the first two real screens described through the router rather than by
87//! reading a stylesheet.
88//!
89//! A goingson project card carries two trailing badges, a type and a toned
90//! status; a contact card carries a primary email *and* a strip of tags. `Meta`
91//! is one slot and one string, so both ports joined their facts with a
92//! separator and lost what the second one was: a status reads as text where it
93//! used to read as colour. [`Token`] already says exactly the right thing — a
94//! small labelled thing with a kind, a tone and an optional action — and could
95//! only ever be a node in its own right, never inside a row.
96//!
97//! So the missing thing was permission rather than a concept. `Tokens` is that
98//! permission, and `#[non_exhaustive]` arrives with it so the next member is not
99//! a lockstep event across three renderers. The pairing is the point: this
100//! enum's own consumer in `makeover-webview` carried a comment predicting it
101//! would stop compiling one day, which is a lockstep break written down and
102//! waited for rather than prevented.
103//!
104//! Balanced Breakfast was checked before the member was added, because one
105//! consumer wanting something is not evidence. It packs a count and two icon
106//! buttons into the same single `Meta` slot while leaving `Actions` empty, so
107//! the slot was already straining under a second consumer for a different
108//! reason.
109//!
110//! 0.10.0 adds [`Meter`], a proportion carried as a pair rather than as a
111//! percentage. Its own docs carry the argument; the short form is that the
112//! percentage shape had already been tried in goingson and had already needed a
113//! companion flag to recover what rounding and clamping threw away.
114//!
115//! 0.11.0 is four members from the quasi proving ground, batched into one
116//! release because pre-1.0 a minor is breaking and a cascade is nine repos.
117//! Three findings that arrived with them turned out not to belong here at all:
118//! this crate has no notion of an action, a route or a destination, so anything
119//! asking what a control *calls* was never the vocabulary's to say.
120//!
121//! - [`Figure`], a value with a caption. goingson had five of them across five
122//! screens with five class vocabularies for the one shape, which is the
123//! divergence this crate exists to end, sitting in plain sight and counted for
124//! the first time.
125//! - [`RowPart::Proportion`], so a [`Meter`] can sit in a row. `Meter` reached
126//! two of its seven sites at 0.10.0 and the other five are row-shaped. Exactly
127//! [`RowPart::Tokens`]'s problem with a different payload, and it takes
128//! `Tokens`' answer: the part carries the description of a bar, not a node.
129//! - [`Field::max_length`], [`Field::min`] and [`Field::max`], joining
130//! [`Field::required`], which had been sitting here as the sole constraint
131//! while the header above claimed there were none. The set stops before
132//! `pattern`, which fails the renderer test and is one site in one app.
133//! - [`FieldKind::File`]. Every host has an honest answer — a native picker, an
134//! `<input type="file">`, a path prompt, an argument — and it carries no
135//! accepted-types list because `accept` appears at zero sites in either app.
136//!
137//! The evidence rule changed under these, and it is worth recording because four
138//! earlier decisions were made under the old one. The two-app test said a shape
139//! earns a word once a second app wants it. It is backwards: a rule that
140//! withholds a word until a second app has duplicated the code guarantees the
141//! duplication, and app three writes it a third time. The bar is now generic
142//! against bespoke — is this furniture any app would have, or is it this app's
143//! own? Bespoke keeps [`Region::Bespoke`], which already carries a completion
144//! heatmap and is the right answer for a calendar nobody will build twice.
145//!
146//! 0.12.0 is two more from the same proving ground, and the same sorting
147//! happened first: six findings came out of a measurement of goingson's whole
148//! frontend, and four of them turned out to be asking what a control *calls*,
149//! which this crate cannot say. The two that were really here:
150//!
151//! - [`Readiness`] grows from two states to four. It named `Ready` and
152//! `Pending` and stopped, so a screen whose list came back empty had nothing
153//! to say about it; goingson draws an empty state at 27 sites and Balanced
154//! Breakfast at 9. `Empty` and `Failed` are the same axis rather than a new
155//! member beside it, because a region shows one of the four and never two.
156//! `#[non_exhaustive]` arrives with them, the pairing [`RowPart`] made at
157//! 0.9.0 and for the same reason.
158//! - [`Column::sortable`], [`Column::sorted`] and [`Sort`]. The one finding in
159//! the set that completes a member rather than adding one: `Column` shipped
160//! with a width and a priority and could not say that a table is ordered by a
161//! column, so a described table could draw no caret and offer no reordering.
162//!
163//! 0.14.0 is two additive members on two `#[non_exhaustive]` enums, released
164//! together because publishing twice for that is waste and the cascade below
165//! this crate is nine repos.
166//!
167//! - [`Depth::Overlay`]. The enum could say raised, well, sunken and flat, and
168//! could not say that a surface sits *over* the page. Every renderer already
169//! had the surface — `makeover-tui`'s `Palette::overlay`,
170//! `makeover-immediate`'s `Palette::elevation`, `makeover-webview`'s
171//! `--elevation-overlay` — and none of them could be reached from a
172//! description. buckets_of_money has 16 modals waiting on it.
173//! - [`CellPart`], which is [`RowPart`] for tables. A row's parts have carried
174//! their own content intent since 0.2.0, so `.row-actions` inherits rather
175//! than taking a text colour; a table cell had no such vocabulary and
176//! `makeover-webview` emitted one undifferentiated `.cell`, so a button in a
177//! cell was painted as text. The four members are the four things quasi's
178//! `Cell` was measured to hold, and the count is in that crate's history
179//! rather than assumed here.
180//!
181//! What each of the 0.12.0 findings deliberately leaves out is the address — what pressing a
182//! header calls, and where an empty state's "Add your first project" button
183//! goes. That is the boundary this crate is defined by, and four findings moved
184//! across it rather than being answered here.
185//!
186//! # Where the description stops
187//!
188//! The bespoke widgets, a day-plan timeline and a kanban board and a calendar,
189//! are not describable here and will not become describable. A description
190//! expressive enough to produce a timeline is a widget library wearing a
191//! description's name. Generate the boring 80% so the bespoke 20% gets the
192//! attention.
193//!
194//! [`Region::Bespoke`] is how that limit is stated rather than hidden. The
195//! description names the *place* and the app owns the contents, so a screen
196//! containing a timeline is still a whole screen and still routable. Without
197//! it, the four goingson screens that make the app worth using would need a
198//! second, undescribed path beside the router, and two paths is how a
199//! vocabulary starts drifting from its app again.
200
201#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
202
203/// A colour intent this crate refers to but never resolves.
204///
205/// The string is the token name `makeover` publishes, so a renderer can look
206/// it up without this crate knowing what colour came back.
207pub trait Intent {
208 /// The `makeover` intent token this resolves against.
209 fn token(self) -> &'static str;
210}
211
212/// Which way the light falls across a two-tone edge.
213///
214/// The whole content of a bevel, once colour and thickness are deferred. The
215/// light is always assumed to come from the top left: every consumer measured
216/// agreed on that and none of them ever varied it, so it is an invariant here
217/// rather than a parameter.
218///
219/// # The two corners that belong to both edges
220///
221/// Top-right and bottom-left are where the lit run meets the shaded one, and
222/// the description's claim is that they belong to *both*. How a renderer says
223/// that is its own business, because the answer is bounded by resolution and
224/// not by taste:
225///
226/// - A terminal cell is roughly 8x17 device pixels, so giving the whole corner
227/// to one tone thickens that edge by a cell and reads as one run overrunning
228/// the other. A half-cell glyph divides the cell already, so `makeover-tui`
229/// splits it and recovers real information. Its box-drawing fallback cannot:
230/// a single stroke has no half to give, so there both corners go to dark.
231/// - A pixel bevel is a one-point stroke by default, which makes the corner a
232/// one-point square. There is nothing to divide — a diagonal seam across one
233/// point is sub-pixel, and antialiasing renders it as the blend a mitred join
234/// already produces. So `makeover-immediate` mitres and is *not* diverging;
235/// it is the same rule at a resolution where the split degenerates.
236///
237/// Stated here so the difference reads as a decision rather than as drift. A
238/// renderer with room to divide the corner should; one without should mitre or
239/// pick the shaded tone, and neither is a bug.
240#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
241pub enum Bevel {
242 /// Lit from the top left: light on top and left, dark on bottom and right.
243 Raised,
244 /// The same edge inverted, which is also the pressed state of anything
245 /// that draws itself [`Bevel::Raised`].
246 Inset,
247}
248
249impl Bevel {
250 /// The edge intents, as `(top_left, bottom_right)`.
251 ///
252 /// Split out from any painting because the inversion *is* the idea, and
253 /// it is the one part every renderer implements identically.
254 #[must_use]
255 pub const fn edges(self) -> (Edge, Edge) {
256 match self {
257 Self::Raised => (Edge::Light, Edge::Dark),
258 Self::Inset => (Edge::Dark, Edge::Light),
259 }
260 }
261
262 /// Pressing inverts. A raised control reads as inset while held.
263 ///
264 /// Stated here rather than left to each consumer because a cascade can
265 /// carry a pressed state and an immediate-mode renderer cannot: audiofiles
266 /// resolves this per call site, eighteen times.
267 #[must_use]
268 pub const fn pressed(self) -> Self {
269 match self {
270 Self::Raised => Self::Inset,
271 Self::Inset => Self::Raised,
272 }
273 }
274}
275
276/// One side of a bevel, named by the intent it takes.
277#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
278pub enum Edge {
279 /// The lit side.
280 Light,
281 /// The shadowed side.
282 Dark,
283}
284
285impl Intent for Edge {
286 fn token(self) -> &'static str {
287 match self {
288 Self::Light => "bevel-light",
289 Self::Dark => "bevel-dark",
290 }
291 }
292}
293
294/// A surface intent a region is filled with.
295///
296/// `#[non_exhaustive]`, so a renderer must carry a wildcard arm and a new
297/// member is additive rather than breaking. Added 0.4.0, after [`Sunken`]
298/// (an additive member, 0.3.0) hard-broke `makeover-tui` and
299/// `makeover-immediate` at compile time and left neither able to move until
300/// both published. The vocabulary exists to grow and the renderers exist to
301/// disagree about how much of it they answer, so growth must not be a
302/// lockstep event. The renderer's wildcard is not a hole: [`Fill`] is
303/// resolved through a fallible lookup, and a missing intent is answered with
304/// structure rather than with a substituted colour.
305///
306/// [`Sunken`]: Fill::Sunken
307#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
308#[non_exhaustive]
309pub enum Fill {
310 /// The page behind everything.
311 Page,
312 /// A surface lifted off the page: cards, controls, menus, toasts.
313 Raised,
314 /// A surface floating above the page rather than resting on it.
315 Overlay,
316 /// The inside of a well.
317 Well,
318 /// A surface set back from the one it sits on, by colour and nothing else.
319 ///
320 /// Not a well. A well is a hole with an edge, and the two are authored in
321 /// opposite directions: `makeover` derives `surface-well` by inverting
322 /// against the theme's own content colour, while `surface-sunken` is
323 /// authored and free to sit darker than raised (goingson's does). Naming
324 /// only the well left the recessed-with-no-edge surface unsayable, which is
325 /// what an unchosen tab is: it recedes so the chosen one can come forward,
326 /// and it carries no bevel of its own.
327 ///
328 /// Added 0.3.0, from goingson's tab strip, which hand-writes exactly this
329 /// and could not delete the line because no member described it.
330 Sunken,
331}
332
333// No `fallback` here, deliberately. An earlier cut had `Fill::Well` fall back
334// to `Fill::Page` so a consumer on makeover 2.2.0, which has no `surface-well`,
335// had something to paint. makeover-tui found that wrong within a day: page is
336// the surface a well is usually cut into, so on a terminal that substitution
337// produces exactly the invisibility it was meant to prevent, and the right
338// answer there is a drawn edge rather than a different colour.
339//
340// Substituting one intent for another is renderer policy. The description says
341// what the region is and stops.
342
343impl Intent for Fill {
344 fn token(self) -> &'static str {
345 match self {
346 Self::Page => "surface-page",
347 Self::Raised => "surface-raised",
348 Self::Overlay => "surface-overlay",
349 Self::Well => "surface-well",
350 Self::Sunken => "surface-sunken",
351 }
352 }
353}
354
355/// How a region sits relative to the surface behind it.
356///
357/// Fill and bevel are named together because naming them apart is what let
358/// them disagree. Every consumer measured had at least one region carrying a
359/// raised bevel over a recessed fill: audiofiles fixed it in `raised_frame`
360/// and recorded the bug in its doc comment, and Balanced Breakfast still had
361/// twelve of them a year later. A single name for the pair makes that
362/// unrepresentable.
363/// `#[non_exhaustive]` for the same reason as [`Fill`], and in the same
364/// release: a depth this renderer has no drawing for should cost it a
365/// wildcard arm, not a compile error and a wait on someone else's publish.
366#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
367#[non_exhaustive]
368pub enum Depth {
369 /// Level with its surroundings. No edge.
370 Flat,
371 /// A card laid on the panel it sits in.
372 Raised,
373 /// A hole in the panel, with content down inside it. For anything the
374 /// user looks *into*: a table body, a tag tree, a text field.
375 Well,
376 /// Set back from what it sits on, by colour alone. No edge.
377 ///
378 /// The one member carrying a fill without a bevel, so a renderer cannot
379 /// assume the two arrive together. That is deliberate and it is still the
380 /// pairing rule: both halves come off the same `Depth`, so they cannot
381 /// disagree, and here one half is legitimately absent.
382 ///
383 /// Distinct from [`Depth::Flat`], which has no fill either and inherits.
384 /// Recessed and level-with are different claims, and only one of them
385 /// needs a colour.
386 Sunken,
387 /// A surface sitting *over* the page rather than in it. A modal, a popover,
388 /// a menu.
389 ///
390 /// Takes elevation and no bevel: a surface overlaying the page is lifted
391 /// off it, and a surface in the page is cut into it. That is the same
392 /// pairing rule the rest of the enum holds, applied to the one case where
393 /// the separation is not an edge at all — the lift and the scrim behind it
394 /// are already saying where the surface is.
395 ///
396 /// Every renderer had the surface before it had this variant.
397 /// `makeover-tui` carries `Palette::overlay`, `makeover-immediate` gained
398 /// `Palette::elevation` at 0.10.0, and `makeover-webview` emits
399 /// `--elevation-overlay`. What was missing was the route from a description
400 /// to any of them, which is why this is one variant rather than a feature.
401 Overlay,
402}
403
404impl Depth {
405 /// The edge this depth is drawn with, if it has one.
406 #[must_use]
407 pub const fn bevel(self) -> Option<Bevel> {
408 match self {
409 // Sunken joins Flat here, for the opposite reason: Flat has no edge
410 // because nothing separates it from its surroundings, and Sunken has
411 // none because its colour is already doing the separating.
412 Self::Flat | Self::Sunken => None,
413 // A third reason to have no edge, which is why it gets its own arm
414 // rather than joining the two above: an overlay is separated by the
415 // lift and by the scrim behind it, so an edge would be a second
416 // answer to a question already answered.
417 Self::Overlay => None,
418 Self::Raised => Some(Bevel::Raised),
419 Self::Well => Some(Bevel::Inset),
420 }
421 }
422
423 /// The surface this depth is filled with.
424 ///
425 /// [`Depth::Flat`] has no fill of its own: it inherits whatever it sits on,
426 /// which is the difference between level-with and painted-the-same-colour.
427 #[must_use]
428 pub const fn fill(self) -> Option<Fill> {
429 match self {
430 Self::Flat => None,
431 Self::Raised => Some(Fill::Raised),
432 Self::Well => Some(Fill::Well),
433 Self::Sunken => Some(Fill::Sunken),
434 Self::Overlay => Some(Fill::Overlay),
435 }
436 }
437
438 /// Pressing a raised region reads as a well, and nothing else moves.
439 ///
440 /// [`Depth::Overlay`] is untouched along with the rest: an overlay is a
441 /// surface, not a control, so there is nothing there to press.
442 #[must_use]
443 pub const fn pressed(self) -> Self {
444 match self {
445 Self::Raised => Self::Well,
446 other => other,
447 }
448 }
449}
450
451/// An interaction state a region can be in, beside whatever [`Depth`] it is.
452///
453/// Orthogonal to depth on purpose. A disabled button is still [`Depth::Raised`]
454/// and a disabled field is still a [`Depth::Well`], so folding either member
455/// into `Depth` would make [`Depth::bevel`] and [`Depth::fill`] answer for
456/// something that is not a depth, and would leave disabled-button and
457/// disabled-field sharing one variant that cannot tell them apart.
458///
459/// # Why hover and pressed are not members
460///
461/// The line is whether every renderer has the state to express, not whether CSS
462/// does. Hover is renderer policy and `makeover-webview` says so in its own
463/// header: a terminal and an immediate-mode painter have no pointer hovering
464/// over anything, and pressed already arrives through [`Bevel::pressed`] and
465/// [`Depth::pressed`], where it belongs, because pressing is a depth inversion
466/// rather than a separate condition.
467///
468/// Focus and disabled are different in kind. A TUI has a focused widget and a
469/// greyed-out one; so does egui. Both were unsayable here, so all three webview
470/// consumers supplied them from outside the primitive by out-specifying rules
471/// they did not own: goingson alone carries 19 of them, and the MNW server
472/// another 21. That is the divergence this crate exists to end, arriving one
473/// layer down.
474///
475/// # The principle this encodes
476///
477/// A primitive owns every state it implies. A renderer that emits a hover rule
478/// for a thing owes disabled, focus and the capability answer for that same
479/// thing, because anything less exports the completion work to N consumers who
480/// will each do it differently.
481///
482/// `#[non_exhaustive]` for the reason [`Fill`] and [`Depth`] carry it: growth
483/// must not be a lockstep event across the three renderers.
484#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
485#[non_exhaustive]
486pub enum State {
487 /// Keyboard focus, as distinct from the pointer having landed on something.
488 ///
489 /// One ring, not one per primitive. Where the ring sits is [`Depth`]'s
490 /// question and not a per-component choice: a well takes it inside its own
491 /// edge and a raised surface takes it outside. That is one decision with
492 /// two renderings rather than one decision per component, which is how the
493 /// three apps ended up with three rings.
494 Focus,
495 /// Present, visible, and not answering.
496 ///
497 /// Not the same as absent, and deliberately not a [`Fill`]: a disabled
498 /// control keeps the surface it always had and stops responding, so what
499 /// changes is its content and its interactivity rather than what it is.
500 Disabled,
501}
502
503impl State {
504 /// Whether a region in this state stops answering the pointer.
505 ///
506 /// Stated in the description rather than left to each renderer, on the same
507 /// reasoning as [`Bevel::pressed`]: a cascade carries it for free and an
508 /// immediate-mode renderer resolves it per call site, so leaving it unsaid
509 /// means resolving it once per consumer and disagreeing.
510 #[must_use]
511 pub const fn suppresses_interaction(self) -> bool {
512 match self {
513 Self::Disabled => true,
514 Self::Focus => false,
515 }
516 }
517}
518
519impl Intent for State {
520 fn token(self) -> &'static str {
521 match self {
522 // Already derived by `makeover` from `action.primary`, and unused
523 // until now for the same reason `hover-surface` was: nothing
524 // emitted the rule that would consume it.
525 Self::Focus => "focus-ring",
526 // Reusing the muted content intent rather than minting a
527 // `disabled` colour. Disabled is a reduction and not a status, and
528 // `makeover-webview`'s progress rules already record the reading
529 // that `content-muted` is what disabled looks like.
530 Self::Disabled => "content-muted",
531 }
532 }
533}
534
535/// What a region is saying, when it is saying something.
536///
537/// The one intent family shared by badges, notices and nothing else. Kept
538/// separate from [`Fill`] because a surface is where a thing sits and a tone is
539/// what it means, and the three apps agree on the four statuses:
540/// `info_banner` / `warning_banner` in audiofiles, `.toast-info` /
541/// `.toast-success` / `.toast-error` in goingson, `.toast.success` /
542/// `.toast.error` in Balanced Breakfast.
543///
544/// The per-tag palette (`category-one` through `category-six`) is deliberately
545/// not here. Which colour a *particular* tag takes is app domain, and both
546/// webview apps already carry it as a `data-color` attribute.
547#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
548pub enum Tone {
549 /// No status. Reads as ordinary de-emphasised content.
550 Neutral,
551 /// Something worth knowing and nothing to do about it.
552 Info,
553 /// Something finished and it worked.
554 Success,
555 /// Something the user should look at before continuing.
556 Warning,
557 /// Something broken, or something about to be destroyed.
558 Danger,
559}
560
561impl Intent for Tone {
562 fn token(self) -> &'static str {
563 match self {
564 // Neutral has no status token of its own. It takes the muted
565 // content intent, which is what both webview apps already spell as
566 // `data-color="muted"`.
567 Self::Neutral => "content-muted",
568 Self::Info => "info",
569 Self::Success => "success",
570 Self::Warning => "warning",
571 Self::Danger => "danger",
572 }
573 }
574}
575
576/// A small labelled thing that sits inside something else.
577///
578/// Two members, because the three apps drew three taxonomies and only one line
579/// runs through all of them: does it answer a click. audiofiles has
580/// `classification_badge` (a label) against `tag_chip`, `tag_chip_removable`
581/// and `selectable_tag` (all of which do). Balanced Breakfast has `.tag` and
582/// `.badge` against `.tag-chip`. goingson is the one that has to move: its
583/// `.tag` and `.badge` are a single CSS rule, so every call site has to be read
584/// to decide which of the two it always was.
585///
586/// The evidence that a chip is a real concept rather than a badge with a
587/// cursor: audiofiles inverts its bevel on press and Balanced Breakfast latches
588/// `.tag-chip.active` with the inset bevel. Two independent arrivals at "a chip
589/// holds itself down", which is exactly what [`Depth::pressed`] already says.
590#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
591pub enum Token {
592 /// Non-interactive status or count. Answers no click.
593 Badge,
594 /// An interactive or removable token. Answers a click, and latches if it
595 /// stands for a filter that is either on or off.
596 Chip {
597 /// Whether it carries its own remove affordance.
598 removable: bool,
599 },
600}
601
602impl Token {
603 /// Whether this answers a click.
604 ///
605 /// The whole difference between the two members, and the reason a renderer
606 /// with no hover (a touch surface, a terminal) can still tell them apart.
607 #[must_use]
608 pub const fn interactive(self) -> bool {
609 matches!(self, Self::Chip { .. })
610 }
611
612 /// How it sits, given whether it is currently latched down.
613 ///
614 /// A badge is flat: it is a label, and giving it an edge would say it can
615 /// be pressed. A chip is raised, and inset while latched.
616 #[must_use]
617 pub const fn depth(self, latched: bool) -> Depth {
618 match self {
619 Self::Badge => Depth::Flat,
620 Self::Chip { .. } if latched => Depth::Well,
621 Self::Chip { .. } => Depth::Raised,
622 }
623 }
624}
625
626/// Something the app is telling the user, unprompted.
627///
628/// Two concepts, not one with a placement. They differ in more than where they
629/// sit: a toast is transient, stacked and self-dismissing, and a banner is
630/// persistent, in flow, one per region, and dismissed by fixing the condition
631/// it reports. Folding them into one member with a placement parameter would
632/// make lifetime, stacking and dismissal all placement-dependent, which is the
633/// description leaking renderer policy.
634///
635/// All three apps have banners: `info_banner` and `warning_banner` in
636/// audiofiles, five of them in goingson (sync, sync-result, vacation-day,
637/// timer-active, past-review), `.update-banner` in Balanced Breakfast. The two
638/// webview apps also have toasts. So neither member is speculative, and no app
639/// gains a concept it lacks except audiofiles, whose renderer may legitimately
640/// decline to draw a toast at all.
641#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
642pub enum Notice {
643 /// Transient, stacked, dismisses itself.
644 Toast,
645 /// Persistent, in flow, one per region, dismissed by fixing the cause.
646 Banner,
647}
648
649impl Notice {
650 /// Whether it goes away on its own.
651 #[must_use]
652 pub const fn transient(self) -> bool {
653 matches!(self, Self::Toast)
654 }
655
656 /// How it sits.
657 ///
658 /// A toast floats above the page rather than resting on it, which is
659 /// [`Fill::Overlay`]'s whole reason to exist. A banner is a card in the
660 /// flow. Both are raised, and they are raised off different things.
661 #[must_use]
662 pub const fn fill(self) -> Fill {
663 match self {
664 Self::Toast => Fill::Overlay,
665 Self::Banner => Fill::Raised,
666 }
667 }
668}
669
670/// The parts of a list row.
671///
672/// Four to begin with, taken from Balanced Breakfast, which was the only
673/// consumer that had all of them (`row-primary`, `row-secondary`, `row-meta`,
674/// `row-actions`). audiofiles has two and no slot structure at all, so it gains
675/// meta and actions as real work rather than a rename; goingson moves off
676/// `task-row` / `task-cell`.
677///
678/// [`Tokens`](Self::Tokens) joined at 0.9.0, and `#[non_exhaustive]` with it.
679/// See the crate header for why the two arrived together.
680///
681/// # Meta against Tokens
682///
683/// The line is whether the thing has its own standing. `Meta` is one short
684/// trailing fact about the row, written as text: a count, a size, a date.
685/// `Tokens` is a set of small labelled things, each of which can be toned and
686/// can answer a click. "3 files" is meta. A status badge that is amber, and a
687/// tag you can click to filter by, are tokens.
688///
689/// Keeping them apart is what a single widened slot would have foreclosed. A
690/// renderer can right-align one string and cannot usefully do the same to a
691/// strip of chips, and a fact that is not clickable should not be drawn as
692/// though it were.
693#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
694#[non_exhaustive]
695pub enum RowPart {
696 /// The thing itself. What the row is called.
697 Primary,
698 /// Supporting text under the primary.
699 Secondary,
700 /// A short trailing fact: a count, a size, a date.
701 Meta,
702 /// Controls that act on this row.
703 Actions,
704 /// Small labelled things belonging to the row: badges, chips, tags.
705 ///
706 /// Each carries its own [`Token`] kind and [`Tone`], so a renderer with no
707 /// colour still has the kind to work with, and one with no chips still has
708 /// the label. That is the constrained-consumer test this vocabulary exists
709 /// to pass, and it is why the tone lives on the token rather than on the
710 /// part.
711 Tokens,
712 /// How much of a set the row's thing has done: a [`Meter`] in the row.
713 ///
714 /// Added 0.11.0, `da5666ae`, and it is [`Tokens`](Self::Tokens)'s problem
715 /// again with a different payload. [`Meter`] arrived at 0.10.0 and closed
716 /// two of the seven sites that asked for it; the other five sit in rows, and
717 /// a row holds no nodes by the ruling that a row part may not carry an
718 /// arbitrary node — the door through which a description becomes a
719 /// templating language. So the part carries the *description of a bar*
720 /// rather than a node, exactly as `Tokens` carries tags rather than nodes.
721 ///
722 /// Without it a row flattens the proportion into [`Meta`](Self::Meta) as
723 /// "3/7 subtasks", which keeps both numbers and loses the reading, the same
724 /// way a toned status badge read as prose before `Tokens`.
725 Proportion,
726}
727
728impl RowPart {
729 /// The content intent the part takes.
730 #[must_use]
731 pub const fn intent(self) -> &'static str {
732 match self {
733 Self::Primary => "content",
734 Self::Secondary => "content-secondary",
735 Self::Meta => "content-muted",
736 // Actions carry controls rather than text, so they inherit.
737 Self::Actions => "content",
738 // So do tokens: each one carries its own tone, and a part-level
739 // intent underneath it would fight the token that sits on it.
740 Self::Tokens => "content",
741 // And so does a proportion, for the same reason: the meter carries
742 // the tone, and it is about the ratio rather than about the row.
743 Self::Proportion => "content",
744 }
745 }
746}
747
748/// How far down the heading tree a title sits.
749///
750/// Three, and only the three that are actually headings. The bands those used
751/// to be filed with (goingson's `.page-header`, Balanced Breakfast's `.header`
752/// and `.detail-header`) are arrangement, not type, and live at
753/// [`Region::Band`]. One of them contains no text at all.
754#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
755pub enum Heading {
756 /// Names the whole screen. One per screen.
757 Page,
758 /// Names a block within the screen.
759 Section,
760 /// Names a sub-block inside an already-named section.
761 Subsection,
762}
763
764impl Heading {
765 /// Whether a rule follows the heading.
766 ///
767 /// audiofiles' `section_header` draws a separator and its
768 /// `subsection_label` deliberately does not, which is the only thing
769 /// distinguishing the two once weight and colour are deferred.
770 #[must_use]
771 pub const fn separated(self) -> bool {
772 matches!(self, Self::Section)
773 }
774}
775
776/// A control that picks between things.
777///
778/// Three, because three distinct behaviours are in play and collapsing any two
779/// loses something. A segmented control picks a value; a tab picks a pane; a
780/// toggle picks nothing and simply holds itself on or off.
781#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
782pub enum Selector {
783 /// Exactly one of N, and the options abut.
784 Segmented,
785 /// Independent on or off, on its own.
786 Toggle,
787 /// Navigation between panes. The folder semantic.
788 Tabs,
789}
790
791impl Selector {
792 /// How the chosen option sits.
793 ///
794 /// Held in for a segmented control and a toggle, which is the same shape
795 /// pressing produces and the whole economy of the idiom: one appearance,
796 /// two reasons to wear it. A tab is the exception, because the selected
797 /// folder tab comes *forward* to join the pane it opens.
798 #[must_use]
799 pub const fn chosen(self) -> Depth {
800 match self {
801 Self::Segmented | Self::Toggle => Depth::Well,
802 Self::Tabs => Depth::Raised,
803 }
804 }
805
806 /// How the options that were *not* picked sit.
807 ///
808 /// Added 0.3.0. Describing only [`Selector::chosen`] left the unchosen
809 /// option falling through to [`Depth::Flat`], which says it is level with
810 /// the strip it sits in, and no renderer emitted anything for it. That is
811 /// wrong in both directions and goingson proved it: its unchosen tabs are
812 /// recessed by hand, and being recessed is *why* the chosen one reads as
813 /// coming forward. Against a flat strip, a raised chosen tab is a bevel
814 /// drawn on the strip's own colour, which is a much weaker folder effect
815 /// than the contrast the idiom is named after.
816 ///
817 /// Each member is the inverse of its chosen state, which is the whole
818 /// content of "picked" once colour is deferred:
819 ///
820 /// - Tabs recede, so the chosen one comes forward.
821 /// - A segment and a toggle stand up, so the chosen one is held in.
822 #[must_use]
823 pub const fn unchosen(self) -> Depth {
824 match self {
825 Self::Tabs => Depth::Sunken,
826 Self::Segmented | Self::Toggle => Depth::Raised,
827 }
828 }
829
830 /// Whether the options touch.
831 ///
832 /// The gap is the entire difference between a segmented control and a row
833 /// of buttons that happen to sit near each other, which is what audiofiles'
834 /// `segmented_control` says in its own comment and why it zeroes the
835 /// spacing by hand.
836 #[must_use]
837 pub const fn abutting(self) -> bool {
838 matches!(self, Self::Segmented | Self::Tabs)
839 }
840}
841
842/// What is in a region right now.
843///
844/// The state, not the shimmer. Whether pending paints a skeleton, a spinner or
845/// nothing at all is renderer policy, the same class of decision that got
846/// `Fill::fallback` deleted from this crate. goingson and Balanced Breakfast
847/// each grew a skeleton with differently-named parts; both keep them, as the
848/// webview renderer's expression of [`Readiness::Pending`]. audiofiles has none
849/// and needs none, because an immediate-mode renderer simply repaints.
850///
851/// # Four states and not two, as of 0.12.0
852///
853/// `703f4cd2`. It named `Ready` and `Pending` and stopped, so a described screen
854/// whose list came back empty had to render an empty region or invent its own
855/// placeholder text, and neither says what it is. goingson draws one at 27 sites
856/// across 12 files and Balanced Breakfast at 9, with a class family that had
857/// already drifted into `empty-state`, `empty-state--error`, `error-state` and
858/// six more.
859///
860/// The four are one axis because they are mutually exclusive: a region shows its
861/// content, or a sign that it is coming, or a sign that there is none, or a sign
862/// that it broke. Never two. That is the test for one enum against several
863/// fields, and it is why this grew rather than a new member arriving beside it.
864///
865/// # What is not here
866///
867/// **The message.** "No projects yet" is content, and this names a state. It
868/// lives with whatever holds the region — in quasi's case a `Slot` — alongside
869/// the action that leads out of the emptiness, since an address is the one thing
870/// this crate never names.
871///
872/// **How much room it gets.** goingson's `--compact`, `--dashboard` and
873/// `--padded` are the same state at three sizes, and a size is
874/// `makeover-geometry`'s question. Naming them here would be this crate stating
875/// values again.
876///
877/// **The icon.** Presentation, and each host has its own answer or none.
878#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
879#[non_exhaustive]
880pub enum Readiness {
881 /// The content is here.
882 Ready,
883 /// The content is on its way.
884 Pending,
885 /// The content arrived and there is none of it.
886 ///
887 /// Not a failure. An empty list is the normal state of a new install, and a
888 /// renderer that drew it in a danger tone would be reporting a fault where
889 /// there is none.
890 Empty,
891 /// The content did not arrive.
892 Failed,
893}
894
895impl Readiness {
896 /// Whether the region draws its own content, or something standing in for
897 /// it.
898 ///
899 /// The question every renderer asks first, so it is answered once here
900 /// rather than by a `matches!` in each. A state added later is a stand-in
901 /// until proven otherwise: falling back to drawing content that may not be
902 /// there is the worse of the two mistakes.
903 #[must_use]
904 pub const fn shows_content(self) -> bool {
905 matches!(self, Self::Ready)
906 }
907
908 /// What the state means, for a renderer choosing a colour.
909 ///
910 /// Derived rather than carried, which is the opposite of [`Meter`] and
911 /// [`Figure`], and the difference is worth stating: a proportion's meaning
912 /// depends on what is being counted and only the app knows it, while
913 /// "nothing here yet" and "this broke" mean the same thing in every app that
914 /// will ever have them.
915 #[must_use]
916 pub const fn tone(self) -> Tone {
917 match self {
918 Self::Failed => Tone::Danger,
919 _ => Tone::Neutral,
920 }
921 }
922}
923
924/// How much of a set is done.
925///
926/// Added 0.10.0. Nine sites across the two webview apps drew a bar and nothing
927/// here named one, so every described screen concatenated the two numbers into
928/// its heading text instead: "Subtasks 3/7", "Time Tracking 45m tracked / 30m
929/// est, over". Every fact survives that and the reading does not, which is the
930/// same loss `RowPart::Tokens` closed when a toned status badge became prose.
931///
932/// # Why a pair and not a percentage
933///
934/// Both numbers, not the percentage the apps compute from them. The percentage
935/// was the obvious shape and it had already been tried: goingson's
936/// `Task::time_progress` divides, rounds, and then clamps to 100, which throws
937/// away the one case the bar exists to show — 45 minutes tracked against a
938/// 30-minute estimate. It carries a separate `is_over_estimate` boolean beside
939/// it to recover the fact the clamp dropped. A pair keeps the over-run without a
940/// companion flag, and [`percent`](Meter::percent) is still one call away for a
941/// renderer that wants it.
942///
943/// The pair is also what the apps already have at every site. All seven
944/// determinate bars write the ratio into the accessible layer and never the
945/// percentage: `title="3/7 subtasks"`, `aria-label="3 of 7 subtasks completed"`,
946/// a milestone's own `3/7` span. Given 43 nothing can recover "3 of 7", so a
947/// percentage member would have made [`label`](Meter::label) mandatory at every
948/// call site, which is the concatenated text this member removes, moved one
949/// layer down.
950///
951/// # What this is not
952///
953/// The progress of an *operation*. Two of the nine sites are that — goingson's
954/// focus timer, Balanced Breakfast's feed fetch — and they get nothing here, on
955/// purpose. Both are imperative controllers over a live handle, driven by a tick
956/// or an event stream, and a description is built once and dropped. Holding one
957/// would mean growing a way to update a description between renders, which is a
958/// different feature. [`Readiness::Pending`] and a [`Notice::Toast`] carry the
959/// honest part.
960///
961/// The two cases are distinguishable in the markup rather than by taste: every
962/// determinate bar in both apps carries a tone, and neither operation bar
963/// carries one. Two codebases drew that line the same way without coordinating.
964#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
965pub struct Meter<'a> {
966 /// How much is done. May exceed [`total`](Self::total), and that is the
967 /// case worth drawing.
968 pub done: u32,
969 /// How much there is to do. Zero means there is no set, not that the set is
970 /// complete.
971 pub total: u32,
972 /// What the proportion means right now.
973 ///
974 /// Carried rather than derived, because no renderer can work it out. The
975 /// same 90% is [`Tone::Success`] on a subtask rollup and [`Tone::Danger`] on
976 /// a time estimate, and goingson picks between them from `is_over_estimate`,
977 /// a fact about the data and not about the number.
978 pub tone: Tone,
979 /// What is being counted, if the bar says so: "subtasks", "tasks".
980 ///
981 /// The noun, not the ratio. A renderer builds "3 of 7 subtasks" from this
982 /// and the two numbers; handing it the assembled string would put the
983 /// sentence order in the description, where a terminal at one line and a
984 /// tooltip want different ones.
985 pub label: Option<&'a str>,
986}
987
988impl<'a> Meter<'a> {
989 /// A proportion with no tone and no label.
990 #[must_use]
991 pub const fn new(done: u32, total: u32) -> Self {
992 Self {
993 done,
994 total,
995 tone: Tone::Neutral,
996 label: None,
997 }
998 }
999
1000 /// What the proportion means.
1001 #[must_use]
1002 pub const fn tone(mut self, tone: Tone) -> Self {
1003 self.tone = tone;
1004 self
1005 }
1006
1007 /// What is being counted.
1008 #[must_use]
1009 pub const fn label(mut self, label: &'a str) -> Self {
1010 self.label = Some(label);
1011 self
1012 }
1013
1014 /// How full the bar is, 0 to 100, clamped.
1015 ///
1016 /// For drawing, which is the only thing a clamped number is good for. Ask
1017 /// [`overflowing`](Self::overflowing) before reporting it as a fact, or this
1018 /// is `time_progress`'s bug again with the clamp moved.
1019 ///
1020 /// An empty set reads as 0. Nothing is done, because there is nothing to do
1021 /// and no bar to fill; the apps guard on the count before drawing at all.
1022 #[must_use]
1023 pub const fn percent(&self) -> u8 {
1024 if self.total == 0 {
1025 return 0;
1026 }
1027 let scaled = (self.done as u64 * 100) / self.total as u64;
1028 if scaled > 100 { 100 } else { scaled as u8 }
1029 }
1030
1031 /// Whether more is done than there was to do.
1032 ///
1033 /// The fact [`percent`](Self::percent) destroys, kept reachable so a
1034 /// renderer can mark the over-run rather than drawing a full bar and
1035 /// implying it landed exactly.
1036 #[must_use]
1037 pub const fn overflowing(&self) -> bool {
1038 self.done > self.total
1039 }
1040
1041 /// Whether there is a set at all.
1042 ///
1043 /// A meter over nothing is sayable on purpose, for the same reason a field
1044 /// with no options is: it is what an app with an unloaded count actually
1045 /// has, and a renderer that shows an empty bar says so on screen rather than
1046 /// dividing by zero.
1047 #[must_use]
1048 pub const fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
1049 self.total == 0
1050 }
1051}
1052
1053/// One figure with a caption: a number and what it counts.
1054///
1055/// The dashboard shape. A large value over a small caption, several of them in a
1056/// strip: a current streak, a completion rate, a total. Added 0.11.0,
1057/// `93c6a174`, after goingson turned out to have five of them across five
1058/// screens with five class vocabularies for the one shape — `task-overview-stat`,
1059/// `stat-box`, `month-stat-item`, `contact-summary-stat`, `sync-stat`. Four put
1060/// the value above the caption and one inverts it, which is drift inside the
1061/// shape rather than a second shape.
1062///
1063/// # Why the value is text
1064///
1065/// "17", "84%", "12/30", "3d". A figure is whatever the app computed, already
1066/// formatted, and the formatting is the app's because only it knows whether the
1067/// number is a percentage, a duration or a ratio. This carries none of the
1068/// arithmetic [`Meter`] carries, and that is the difference between them: a
1069/// meter is a proportion a renderer draws, and a figure is a fact a renderer
1070/// sets in type.
1071///
1072/// # Tone is carried, for [`Meter`]'s reason
1073///
1074/// Three of the five sites tone the figure by their own means — `red`/`blue` on
1075/// the weekly review, a `${type}` class on the monthly one, `sync-stat-warn` on
1076/// sync. So tone is carried at every site that needs it and derived at none, and
1077/// no renderer can work out that a streak of zero is worth colouring.
1078///
1079/// # What is not here
1080///
1081/// Whether the figure answers a click. One of the five is a control — sync's
1082/// "Not Applied: 3" opens the list — and an action is not something this crate
1083/// can name: nothing here knows what a route is. That belongs beside the figure
1084/// in whatever layer holds the actions, the same way a row's activation sits
1085/// beside its parts rather than inside them.
1086///
1087/// The arrangement is not here either. Several figures in a strip is a set, and
1088/// a renderer given them one at a time cannot tell it is looking at one; the
1089/// layer that holds the tree is where the set gets said.
1090#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1091pub struct Figure<'a> {
1092 /// The number, formatted the way the app means it to read.
1093 pub value: &'a str,
1094 /// What it counts. The caption under the value.
1095 pub caption: &'a str,
1096 /// How the value has moved, if the app is tracking that.
1097 ///
1098 /// Added 0.13.0. Text, for [`value`](Self::value)'s reason: only the app
1099 /// knows whether a move reads as `+12.5%`, `+3` or `2x`, and a renderer
1100 /// handed a number would have to guess.
1101 ///
1102 /// This is what [`tone`](Self::tone) was for and had no consumer of. The MNW
1103 /// server has four screens whose stat card is a label, a value and a delta,
1104 /// and the delta is the toned part: the figure itself is an ordinary fact
1105 /// and it is the movement that reads as good or bad. Without this the delta
1106 /// has to be folded into the caption, which loses the tone and reads as a
1107 /// longer caption rather than as a second, smaller line.
1108 pub change: Option<&'a str>,
1109 /// What the figure means right now. [`Tone::Neutral`] is an ordinary fact.
1110 ///
1111 /// Applies to [`change`](Self::change) where there is one, since that is the
1112 /// part that carries the judgement, and to the value where there is not.
1113 pub tone: Tone,
1114}
1115
1116impl<'a> Figure<'a> {
1117 /// A figure that is an ordinary fact.
1118 #[must_use]
1119 pub const fn new(value: &'a str, caption: &'a str) -> Self {
1120 Self {
1121 value,
1122 caption,
1123 change: None,
1124 tone: Tone::Neutral,
1125 }
1126 }
1127
1128 /// How the value has moved.
1129 #[must_use]
1130 pub const fn change(mut self, change: &'a str) -> Self {
1131 self.change = Some(change);
1132 self
1133 }
1134
1135 /// What the figure means.
1136 #[must_use]
1137 pub const fn tone(mut self, tone: Tone) -> Self {
1138 self.tone = tone;
1139 self
1140 }
1141}
1142
1143/// A named part of a screen.
1144///
1145/// The thing `makeover-geometry` deliberately does not name: it names the space
1146/// *between* things by relationship, and nothing named the things. Six named
1147/// members, taken from what the two webview apps actually use, plus
1148/// [`Region::Bespoke`] for the parts no description should reach. Both apps'
1149/// `layout.css` currently names exactly two things, `.raised` and `.well`, so
1150/// this layer is absent rather than divergent, which makes it the cheapest of
1151/// the schemas to add and the easiest to over-build.
1152#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1153pub enum Region<'a> {
1154 /// A full-width strip with a title slot and an actions cluster, either of
1155 /// which may be empty. goingson's `.page-header`, Balanced Breakfast's
1156 /// `.header` and `.detail-header` are all this, differing only in which
1157 /// slots they fill.
1158 Band,
1159 /// A persistent column beside the content, holding navigation.
1160 Sidebar,
1161 /// A region of content with its own scroll.
1162 Pane,
1163 /// Two panes side by side, where the left chooses what the right shows.
1164 Split,
1165 /// A set of panes, one visible at a time, with a [`Selector::Tabs`] above.
1166 TabGroup,
1167 /// Content over a scrim, taking input until dismissed.
1168 Modal,
1169 /// A region this crate names the *place* of and nothing else. The app owns
1170 /// what goes in it.
1171 ///
1172 /// The escape hatch, and the thing that keeps the description honest about
1173 /// its own limits. A day-plan timeline, a kanban board, a calendar and the
1174 /// paint interaction over the timeline are not describable here and are not
1175 /// going to become describable: a description expressive enough to produce
1176 /// a timeline is a widget library wearing a description's name.
1177 ///
1178 /// But a screen containing one still has to be a screen. Without this
1179 /// member the description covers only the boring screens, and the four that
1180 /// make goingson worth using would need a second, undescribed path beside
1181 /// the router. Two paths is how the vocabulary starts drifting from the app
1182 /// again, which is the exact failure this crate exists to end.
1183 ///
1184 /// So the description says "a thing called `day-plan` goes here" and stops.
1185 /// The name is opaque: this crate never interprets it, and no renderer is
1186 /// expected to know what it means beyond handing the space over.
1187 Bespoke {
1188 /// What the app calls it. Never interpreted here.
1189 name: &'a str,
1190 },
1191}
1192
1193impl Region<'_> {
1194 /// How the region sits on what is behind it.
1195 #[must_use]
1196 pub const fn depth(self) -> Depth {
1197 match self {
1198 Self::Band | Self::Sidebar | Self::Split | Self::TabGroup => Depth::Flat,
1199 // A pane is looked into, the same as a table body or a tag tree.
1200 Self::Pane => Depth::Well,
1201 Self::Modal => Depth::Raised,
1202 // Flat because it inherits: a bespoke region takes the depth of
1203 // whatever frames it. An app that wants its timeline in a well puts
1204 // it in a `Pane`, which composes rather than adding a knob here.
1205 Self::Bespoke { .. } => Depth::Flat,
1206 }
1207 }
1208
1209 /// Whether this crate can say anything about the region's contents.
1210 ///
1211 /// A renderer walks the description and hands every region it understands
1212 /// to the right drawing code. This is how it tells the two apart, and the
1213 /// reason it is a method rather than a `matches!` at each renderer: there
1214 /// is exactly one opaque member and there should stay exactly one.
1215 #[must_use]
1216 pub const fn described(self) -> bool {
1217 !matches!(self, Self::Bespoke { .. })
1218 }
1219}
1220
1221/// How a screen is laid out.
1222///
1223/// Two, and the second is not a variant of the first. goingson is list-detail,
1224/// Balanced Breakfast is sidebar plus content, and neither app has a third.
1225/// The tab group is a modifier rather than a member, because goingson uses it
1226/// *inside* the same content region rather than instead of one.
1227///
1228/// This exists at all because the router has to be able to express a screen
1229/// rather than only a control. Discovering the arrangement layer missing after
1230/// the renderers exist is a redesign; naming two now is a morning.
1231#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1232pub enum Arrangement {
1233 /// A list that chooses what the detail beside it shows.
1234 ListDetail {
1235 /// Whether the detail side is a [`Region::TabGroup`].
1236 tabbed: bool,
1237 },
1238 /// Navigation down the side, content filling the rest.
1239 SidebarContent,
1240}
1241
1242/// What kind of value a form field takes.
1243///
1244/// The union of the two vocabularies that diverged, which is what triggered
1245/// this crate. They have since converged on their own: both apps now have a
1246/// `renderFormField` emitting the same anatomy, and what is left differing is
1247/// the kind set, the error shape, and whether the return is a string or a node.
1248///
1249/// Validation is deliberately absent. Neither app has a shared story (goingson
1250/// validates after collecting the form data, with per-field transform hooks;
1251/// Balanced Breakfast has `required` and nothing else), and a schema that
1252/// describes fields but not constraints acquires a constraint layer per app,
1253/// which is exactly how the current divergence started. Naming it absent is a
1254/// decision; leaving it unmentioned would not be.
1255/// `#[non_exhaustive]` for the reason [`Fill`] is: renderers match on this and
1256/// the set keeps growing, so growth must not be a lockstep event. Email, Url
1257/// and Tel arriving in 0.5.0 is the second growth in two releases.
1258#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1259#[non_exhaustive]
1260pub enum FieldKind {
1261 /// A single line of text.
1262 Text,
1263 /// A single line of text that must never be echoed, logged or round-tripped
1264 /// through anything that might persist it.
1265 Secret,
1266 /// A number.
1267 Number,
1268 /// An email address.
1269 ///
1270 /// Distinct from [`Text`](Self::Text) because the distinction is not
1271 /// decoration: a webview renderer emits `type="email"`, which on a touch
1272 /// device changes the keyboard that appears and turns on the platform's own
1273 /// validation. goingson ships to iOS, so collapsing this into text costs a
1274 /// keyboard with no `@` on it.
1275 ///
1276 /// Added 0.5.0, from goingson's contact form.
1277 Email,
1278 /// A URL. Same reasoning as [`Email`](Self::Email).
1279 ///
1280 /// Added 0.5.0, from goingson's contact-social and contact-feed forms.
1281 Url,
1282 /// A telephone number. Same reasoning as [`Email`](Self::Email), and the
1283 /// clearest case of it: the keyboard is a numeric pad rather than letters.
1284 ///
1285 /// Added 0.5.0, from goingson's contact-phone form.
1286 Tel,
1287 /// Several lines of text.
1288 Textarea,
1289 /// One of a fixed set, offered behind a control that shows one at a time.
1290 Select,
1291 /// One of a fixed set, with every option on screen at once.
1292 ///
1293 /// Not a presentation of [`Select`](Self::Select), which is the reading to
1294 /// resist: what differs is a property of the *question*. A choice that is
1295 /// consequential or irreversible has to be readable without opening
1296 /// anything, because a closed control shows one option and hides the rest,
1297 /// and the one it shows is whichever was current before the user had read
1298 /// the alternatives. audiofiles asks whether a library copies samples into
1299 /// its store or references them where they lie — which cannot be changed
1300 /// afterwards — and had already promoted that out of a checkbox by hand,
1301 /// with a comment giving this reason, before the description could say it.
1302 ///
1303 /// It is also the one HTML input type this enum was missing. Everything
1304 /// else here is an `<input type=...>`, a `<select>` or a `<textarea>`, and
1305 /// the hole was `radio`.
1306 ///
1307 /// Added 0.8.1, from audiofiles' Add Library form.
1308 Radio,
1309 /// On or off.
1310 Checkbox,
1311 /// A file the user picks from wherever the host keeps files.
1312 ///
1313 /// Added 0.11.0, `844b5ae0`, from goingson's project-dashboard attachments
1314 /// column. It was filed as a router finding — a control whose destination is
1315 /// a host capability rather than an address — and splitting it is what made
1316 /// it two answers instead of one member satisfying neither. *Opening* a file
1317 /// is a one-way handoff and needs no new API. *Picking* one returns a value
1318 /// into a write, which is a form concern, which is this.
1319 ///
1320 /// The membership test passes on every host and not by a stretch: a Tauri
1321 /// app opens a native picker, a server renders `<input type="file">`, a
1322 /// terminal prompts for a path, a CLI takes an argument. That is closer to
1323 /// [`Email`](Self::Email), which exists because it changes the keyboard,
1324 /// than to anything bespoke.
1325 ///
1326 /// It carries no accepted-types list and no multiple flag, and that is
1327 /// measured rather than deferred: `accept` appears at zero sites in either
1328 /// app. A member added for a case nobody has is a member designed against
1329 /// nothing.
1330 File,
1331 /// Carried through the form and never shown.
1332 Hidden,
1333}
1334
1335impl FieldKind {
1336 /// Whether the field is drawn at all.
1337 #[must_use]
1338 pub const fn visible(self) -> bool {
1339 !matches!(self, Self::Hidden)
1340 }
1341
1342 /// Whether the value must be kept out of logs and diagnostics.
1343 #[must_use]
1344 pub const fn confidential(self) -> bool {
1345 matches!(self, Self::Secret)
1346 }
1347
1348 /// Where the field's own label sits.
1349 ///
1350 /// A checkbox labels itself on the right of the box; everything else takes
1351 /// a label above. Both webview apps already do this and both special-case
1352 /// it inline, which is the tell that it belongs in the description.
1353 ///
1354 /// A [`Radio`](Self::Radio) is not one of them, and the near-miss is worth
1355 /// naming: its *options* each label themselves, but the field still asks a
1356 /// question above them, so the group takes a label like everything else.
1357 #[must_use]
1358 pub const fn labels_itself(self) -> bool {
1359 matches!(self, Self::Checkbox)
1360 }
1361
1362 /// Whether the kind reads [`Field::options`].
1363 ///
1364 /// Two kinds do, so the pair is named once here rather than spelled out at
1365 /// each renderer and again in [`Field::options`]' own doc, where "every
1366 /// kind but `Select`" was true for exactly one release. A third
1367 /// option-taking kind should land here and nowhere else.
1368 #[must_use]
1369 pub const fn offers_options(self) -> bool {
1370 matches!(self, Self::Select | Self::Radio)
1371 }
1372}
1373
1374/// One option offered by a field [`FieldKind::offers_options`] accepts.
1375///
1376/// Two strings, because the submitted value and the read label are different
1377/// facts and every renderer that has tried to collapse them has had to
1378/// un-collapse them later. `makeover-webview` invented this shape writing its
1379/// form emitter and it is taken here unchanged; moving it down rather than
1380/// re-deriving it is the point, since the second and third renderers were each
1381/// going to arrive at a near-miss of it.
1382#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1383pub struct Choice<'a> {
1384 /// What is submitted.
1385 pub value: &'a str,
1386 /// What is read.
1387 pub label: &'a str,
1388}
1389
1390impl<'a> Choice<'a> {
1391 /// An option whose submitted value is also its label.
1392 #[must_use]
1393 pub const fn plain(value: &'a str) -> Self {
1394 Self {
1395 value,
1396 label: value,
1397 }
1398 }
1399}
1400
1401/// One field of a form.
1402///
1403/// Borrowed rather than owned: a description is built, read once by a renderer,
1404/// and dropped. Nothing here outlives the screen it describes.
1405///
1406/// # What it carries, and what it does not
1407///
1408/// Stated here so the next renderer does not re-ask, which is what the first
1409/// two both did. It carries everything a renderer needs to *draw* the field:
1410/// its kind, what it is called, what it is asked for, its standing help, what
1411/// is wrong with it now, whether it is compulsory, whether it hides behind a
1412/// disclosure, its ghost text, and the options it offers.
1413///
1414/// It does not carry the **current value**, and it is not going to. That is the
1415/// one thing here that is genuinely renderer state: a webview reads it back out
1416/// of the DOM, an immediate-mode renderer holds a `&mut` to the app's own field
1417/// and writes through it, and a terminal keeps an edit buffer. A description
1418/// that carried the value would have to carry a way to write it back, at which
1419/// point it is a form model and no longer a description.
1420///
1421/// **Constraints** are here and enforcement is not, which is one line rather
1422/// than two. [`required`], [`max_length`], [`min`] and [`max`] are facts about
1423/// the *question*, so a renderer can emit its host's idiom for each — an HTML
1424/// attribute, a marked label, a clamped spinner — and the platform helps the
1425/// user before anything is submitted. Deciding that a value is wrong stays with
1426/// whoever validated, and [`error`] is that decision arriving back.
1427///
1428/// The set stops before `pattern`, and stops there on both tests at once. A
1429/// regex has an honest answer in a webview and none anywhere else: egui would
1430/// have to run it per keystroke and decide what a half-typed value means, which
1431/// is enforcement wearing description's clothes. And it is one site in goingson
1432/// and none in Balanced Breakfast, against 8 and 1 for `maxlength`. Measured
1433/// 2026-08-09, `2cbad3e2`.
1434///
1435/// [`error`]: Field::error
1436/// [`required`]: Field::required
1437/// [`max_length`]: Field::max_length
1438/// [`min`]: Field::min
1439/// [`max`]: Field::max
1440#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1441pub struct Field<'a> {
1442 /// What kind of value it takes.
1443 pub kind: FieldKind,
1444 /// The name the value is submitted under.
1445 pub name: &'a str,
1446 /// What the user is asked for.
1447 pub label: &'a str,
1448 /// Standing help, shown whether or not anything is wrong.
1449 pub hint: Option<&'a str>,
1450 /// What is currently wrong with the value.
1451 pub error: Option<&'a str>,
1452 /// Ghost text shown while the field is empty.
1453 ///
1454 /// User-facing text, and it sits with `label` and `hint` rather than with
1455 /// the value because it is a property of the *question* and not of the
1456 /// answer. It lived renderer-side in `makeover-webview` until 0.8.0 for one
1457 /// reason and it was not a reading on where it belonged: adding a field to
1458 /// a published struct is a breaking change.
1459 ///
1460 /// Not a substitute for a label. A field labelled only by its placeholder
1461 /// loses its label the moment anything is typed, and no renderer here can
1462 /// make that not happen, so the description keeps both.
1463 pub placeholder: Option<&'a str>,
1464 /// The options offered, in the order they are offered.
1465 ///
1466 /// Empty for every kind [`FieldKind::offers_options`] rejects. A field
1467 /// described with no options is sayable on purpose: it is what an app with
1468 /// an unfinished-loading option list actually has, and a renderer showing
1469 /// an empty control says so on screen rather than in a log.
1470 ///
1471 /// Which option is *current* is not here. That is the value, and the value
1472 /// is renderer state.
1473 pub options: &'a [Choice<'a>],
1474 /// Whether the form refuses to submit without it.
1475 pub required: bool,
1476 /// The longest the value may be, in characters.
1477 ///
1478 /// Added 0.11.0 with [`min`](Self::min) and [`max`](Self::max), joining
1479 /// [`required`](Self::required), which had been the only constraint here
1480 /// since before the crate wrote down that it carried none.
1481 pub max_length: Option<u32>,
1482 /// The lowest value accepted, as the host would write it.
1483 ///
1484 /// Text rather than a number, because the bound is only a number for some
1485 /// of the kinds that take one. goingson's own sites are `min="1"` on a
1486 /// duration and `min="2026-08-09T14:30"` on a datetime, and a numeric member
1487 /// could say the first and not the second. The [`kind`](Self::kind) already
1488 /// says how to read it, the same way it does for the value.
1489 pub min: Option<&'a str>,
1490 /// The highest value accepted, as the host would write it. See
1491 /// [`min`](Self::min).
1492 pub max: Option<&'a str>,
1493 /// Whether the field lives behind a "more options" disclosure.
1494 pub extended: bool,
1495}
1496
1497impl<'a> Field<'a> {
1498 /// A plain required-nothing field of the given kind.
1499 #[must_use]
1500 pub const fn new(kind: FieldKind, name: &'a str, label: &'a str) -> Self {
1501 Self {
1502 kind,
1503 name,
1504 label,
1505 hint: None,
1506 error: None,
1507 placeholder: None,
1508 options: &[],
1509 required: false,
1510 max_length: None,
1511 min: None,
1512 max: None,
1513 extended: false,
1514 }
1515 }
1516
1517 /// A select offering the given options.
1518 ///
1519 /// One of the two kinds under-described by [`Field::new`], so it gets a
1520 /// constructor rather than leaving every call site to remember that a
1521 /// select with an empty `options` renders as an empty select.
1522 #[must_use]
1523 pub const fn select(name: &'a str, label: &'a str, options: &'a [Choice<'a>]) -> Self {
1524 Self::offering(FieldKind::Select, name, label, options)
1525 }
1526
1527 /// A radio group offering the given options.
1528 ///
1529 /// The other. Same hazard as [`select`](Self::select) and a worse one: a
1530 /// radio group with no options draws nothing at all, so a call site that
1531 /// forgot them has an empty rectangle rather than a visibly empty control.
1532 #[must_use]
1533 pub const fn radio(name: &'a str, label: &'a str, options: &'a [Choice<'a>]) -> Self {
1534 Self::offering(FieldKind::Radio, name, label, options)
1535 }
1536
1537 /// The shared body of the two constructors that take options.
1538 ///
1539 /// Private, and keyed on the kind rather than exposed, because the two
1540 /// public names are the point: a call site says which question it is
1541 /// asking, not which flag it is setting.
1542 const fn offering(
1543 kind: FieldKind,
1544 name: &'a str,
1545 label: &'a str,
1546 options: &'a [Choice<'a>],
1547 ) -> Self {
1548 Self {
1549 options,
1550 ..Self::new(kind, name, label)
1551 }
1552 }
1553
1554 /// Whether the field is currently reporting a problem.
1555 ///
1556 /// Read this rather than testing `error.is_some()` at each renderer: the
1557 /// error state has to mark the field's whole group and not only the
1558 /// message, because a renderer with no descendant selectors (egui, a
1559 /// terminal) cannot find the group from the message. goingson already marks
1560 /// the group and Balanced Breakfast does not, so goingson's shape is the
1561 /// one taken here.
1562 #[must_use]
1563 pub const fn invalid(&self) -> bool {
1564 self.error.is_some()
1565 }
1566}
1567
1568/// How much room a column asks for.
1569///
1570/// An intent, so the actual floor stays with `makeover-geometry`. goingson's
1571/// task table spells these as `minmax(200px, 1fr)`, `140px` and content-sized;
1572/// only the first three words of that survive deferral.
1573/// `#[non_exhaustive]`, for the reason [`Fill`] and [`FieldKind`] are: a
1574/// renderer matches on this and a vocabulary that grows must not break every
1575/// renderer when it does.
1576#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1577#[non_exhaustive]
1578pub enum Width {
1579 /// Takes what it needs and no more.
1580 Content,
1581 /// A fixed share, the same at every width.
1582 Fixed,
1583 /// Absorbs whatever is left over.
1584 Fill,
1585}
1586
1587/// What a column is worth when there is not room for all of them.
1588///
1589/// Ordered: [`Priority::Optional`] drops first, [`Priority::Essential`] never
1590/// drops. This replaces addressing columns by position, which is what both
1591/// webview apps do today and is a live bug rather than only verbosity. goingson
1592/// hides mobile columns with `nth-child(n+5)` against a seven-column table, so
1593/// inserting a column silently hides the wrong one.
1594/// `#[non_exhaustive]`, same reasoning as [`Width`]. Note the ordering is the
1595/// whole point of the type, so a new tier has to be declared in its place in
1596/// the sequence rather than appended.
1597#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
1598#[non_exhaustive]
1599pub enum Priority {
1600 /// Dropped first.
1601 Optional,
1602 /// Dropped once the optional columns are gone.
1603 Secondary,
1604 /// Never dropped. Without it the row does not identify itself.
1605 Essential,
1606}
1607
1608/// One column of a table.
1609///
1610/// Described once. The grid track, the cell order and the drop behaviour are
1611/// all derived from this, rather than being three hand-written encodings that
1612/// must agree and are never checked against each other.
1613#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1614pub struct Column<'a> {
1615 /// The heading, and the name the cell is addressed by.
1616 pub name: &'a str,
1617 /// How much room it asks for.
1618 pub width: Width,
1619 /// What it is worth when room runs out.
1620 pub priority: Priority,
1621 /// Whether the user can reorder the table by this column.
1622 ///
1623 /// `ce620871`. What reordering *calls* is not here — that is an address, and
1624 /// this crate names none — so a host pairs this with the route the way it
1625 /// pairs a row's parts with the row's activation. This says the affordance
1626 /// exists, which is what a renderer needs to draw a header a user can press
1627 /// rather than a heading they cannot.
1628 pub sortable: bool,
1629 /// Which way the table is ordered by this column, if it is.
1630 ///
1631 /// `None` on every column but the one in force. A renderer draws the caret
1632 /// from this and a webview sets `aria-sort`, which is why it is per column
1633 /// rather than a single fact on the table: the host idiom is a property of
1634 /// the header cell.
1635 ///
1636 /// Independent of [`sortable`](Self::sortable) rather than implied by it,
1637 /// because both combinations mean something. A column sorted and not
1638 /// sortable is a list ordered by a key the user cannot change, which is a
1639 /// real thing to describe and a caret worth drawing.
1640 pub sorted: Option<Sort>,
1641}
1642
1643/// Which way a column is ordered.
1644///
1645/// Two, because there is no third. "Unsorted" is [`Column::sorted`] being
1646/// `None`, and folding it in here would be the same absence said twice.
1647#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1648pub enum Sort {
1649 /// Smallest, earliest or first alphabetically at the top.
1650 Ascending,
1651 /// The other way.
1652 Descending,
1653}
1654
1655impl Sort {
1656 /// The other direction, for a header that flips when pressed.
1657 #[must_use]
1658 pub const fn reversed(self) -> Self {
1659 match self {
1660 Self::Ascending => Self::Descending,
1661 Self::Descending => Self::Ascending,
1662 }
1663 }
1664
1665 /// What a webview writes into `aria-sort`.
1666 ///
1667 /// Named here rather than in the webview renderer because a terminal and an
1668 /// immediate-mode painter both want the same two words for a caret's label,
1669 /// and three renderers picking their own is the drift this crate ends.
1670 #[must_use]
1671 pub const fn as_str(self) -> &'static str {
1672 match self {
1673 Self::Ascending => "ascending",
1674 Self::Descending => "descending",
1675 }
1676 }
1677}
1678
1679impl<'a> Column<'a> {
1680 /// A column that absorbs slack and drops after the optional ones.
1681 #[must_use]
1682 pub const fn new(name: &'a str) -> Self {
1683 Self {
1684 name,
1685 width: Width::Fill,
1686 priority: Priority::Secondary,
1687 sortable: false,
1688 sorted: None,
1689 }
1690 }
1691
1692 /// Whether this column survives at the given cutoff.
1693 ///
1694 /// A renderer narrows by raising the cutoff, and never by counting
1695 /// positions.
1696 #[must_use]
1697 pub const fn kept_at(&self, cutoff: Priority) -> bool {
1698 (self.priority as u8) >= (cutoff as u8)
1699 }
1700}
1701
1702/// What a table cell holds.
1703///
1704/// [`RowPart`] for tables, and it exists for the same reason: a part that
1705/// carries a control is not text, and a renderer with one class for the whole
1706/// cell paints it as though it were. `makeover-webview` emitted a single
1707/// `.cell` until 0.25.0, so a button in a cell inherited the cell's content
1708/// colour, which is the exact drift [`RowPart::intent`] prevents for rows and
1709/// prevented for nothing here.
1710///
1711/// Four members, and the count is what quasi's `Cell` was measured to carry:
1712/// a value, tokens (33 cells across 22 server templates), actions (30 rows
1713/// carrying a control, 5 beside a value) and a link (35 cells across 18
1714/// templates). Nothing was added past what something holds.
1715///
1716/// `#[non_exhaustive]` for [`RowPart`]'s reason: growth here must not be a
1717/// lockstep event across three renderers.
1718///
1719/// # No hover-reveal
1720///
1721/// [`RowPart`] carried a `revealed_on_hover` until 0.13.0 retired it, and this
1722/// enum never gets one. A cell's actions are shown at rest in every consumer
1723/// measured, and a member nothing uses is one three renderers owe an answer
1724/// for.
1725#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
1726#[non_exhaustive]
1727pub enum CellPart {
1728 /// The cell's own text.
1729 Value,
1730 /// Small labelled things in the cell: a status badge, a chip.
1731 Tokens,
1732 /// Controls that act on what the row is about.
1733 Actions,
1734 /// The cell's value, where the value is itself a link.
1735 Link,
1736}
1737
1738impl CellPart {
1739 /// The content intent the part takes.
1740 ///
1741 /// One part is text and three are not, so three answer with the intent
1742 /// inheriting already gives. That is [`RowPart::intent`]'s shape with the
1743 /// text side narrower: a cell's secondary and muted readings are the
1744 /// column's business, not the cell's.
1745 #[must_use]
1746 pub const fn intent(self) -> &'static str {
1747 match self {
1748 Self::Value => "content",
1749 // A token carries its own tone, and a part-level intent underneath
1750 // it would fight the token sitting on it.
1751 Self::Tokens => "content",
1752 // Actions carry controls rather than text.
1753 Self::Actions => "content",
1754 // A link takes the action colour from the control it is, rather
1755 // than the cell's text colour from the cell it sits in.
1756 Self::Link => "content",
1757 }
1758 }
1759}
1760
1761#[cfg(test)]
1762mod tests {
1763 use super::*;
1764
1765 #[test]
1766 fn the_four_readiness_states_are_one_axis_and_only_one_shows_content() {
1767 // Mutually exclusive is the test for one enum against several fields: a
1768 // region shows its content, or that it is coming, or that there is none,
1769 // or that it broke. Never two.
1770 assert!(Readiness::Ready.shows_content());
1771 for state in [Readiness::Pending, Readiness::Empty, Readiness::Failed] {
1772 assert!(!state.shows_content());
1773 }
1774 }
1775
1776 #[test]
1777 fn an_empty_region_is_not_a_broken_one() {
1778 // An empty list is the normal state of a new install. Drawing it in a
1779 // danger tone reports a fault where there is none, and this is the one
1780 // place the distinction is carried.
1781 assert_eq!(Readiness::Empty.tone(), Tone::Neutral);
1782 assert_eq!(Readiness::Failed.tone(), Tone::Danger);
1783 assert_eq!(Readiness::Pending.tone(), Tone::Neutral);
1784 }
1785
1786 #[test]
1787 fn a_column_can_be_sorted_without_being_sortable() {
1788 // Both combinations mean something, which is why the two fields are
1789 // independent rather than one implying the other. A list ordered by a
1790 // key the user cannot change is a real thing with a caret worth drawing.
1791 let fixed = Column {
1792 sorted: Some(Sort::Descending),
1793 ..Column::new("Created")
1794 };
1795
1796 assert!(!fixed.sortable);
1797 assert_eq!(fixed.sorted.map(Sort::as_str), Some("descending"));
1798
1799 let offered = Column {
1800 sortable: true,
1801 ..Column::new("Name")
1802 };
1803 assert_eq!(offered.sorted, None);
1804 }
1805
1806 #[test]
1807 fn a_direction_flips_and_says_what_it_is() {
1808 assert_eq!(Sort::Ascending.reversed(), Sort::Descending);
1809 assert_eq!(Sort::Descending.reversed().reversed(), Sort::Descending);
1810 assert_eq!(Sort::Ascending.as_str(), "ascending");
1811 }
1812
1813 #[test]
1814 fn a_figure_carries_its_tone_because_no_renderer_can_derive_it() {
1815 // Three of goingson's five sites tone the figure by their own means, so
1816 // tone is carried at every site that needs it and derived at none. The
1817 // same reasoning `Meter` reached, from a different direction.
1818 let streak = Figure::new("0", "Current Streak").tone(Tone::Warning);
1819 assert_eq!(streak.tone, Tone::Warning);
1820 assert_eq!(Figure::new("17", "Total").tone, Tone::Neutral);
1821 }
1822
1823 #[test]
1824 fn a_figures_change_is_the_toned_part_and_is_absent_by_default() {
1825 // 0.13.0. The MNW server's stat card is a label, a value and a delta,
1826 // across four screens, and the delta is what reads as good or bad. Tone
1827 // had no consumer before this: the figure itself is an ordinary fact.
1828 let views = Figure::new("1,204", "Views")
1829 .change("+12.5%")
1830 .tone(Tone::Success);
1831 assert_eq!(views.change, Some("+12.5%"));
1832 assert_eq!(views.tone, Tone::Success);
1833
1834 // A figure with nothing to compare against says so by having no change,
1835 // rather than by carrying an empty string a renderer has to test for.
1836 assert_eq!(Figure::new("3.1%", "Conversion").change, None);
1837 }
1838
1839 #[test]
1840 fn a_figures_value_is_text_because_only_the_app_knows_what_it_is() {
1841 // "84%", "12/30", "3d". A figure is whatever the app computed, already
1842 // formatted, and that is the line between this and `Meter`: a meter is
1843 // a proportion a renderer draws, a figure is a fact it sets in type.
1844 for value in ["84%", "12/30", "3d"] {
1845 assert_eq!(Figure::new(value, "Rate").value, value);
1846 }
1847 }
1848
1849 #[test]
1850 fn a_proportion_is_a_row_part_and_takes_no_intent_of_its_own() {
1851 // The meter carries the tone, so a part-level intent underneath would
1852 // fight it. Same answer `Tokens` needed, for the same reason.
1853 assert_eq!(RowPart::Proportion.intent(), RowPart::Tokens.intent());
1854 }
1855
1856 #[test]
1857 fn a_file_field_is_drawn_and_offers_no_options() {
1858 // It is a control the user operates, unlike `Hidden`, and it does not
1859 // pick from a list the description carries, unlike `Select`.
1860 assert!(FieldKind::File.visible());
1861 assert!(!FieldKind::File.offers_options());
1862 assert!(!FieldKind::File.confidential());
1863 }
1864
1865 #[test]
1866 fn a_constraint_is_a_fact_about_the_question_and_not_a_verdict() {
1867 // The whole model: the description carries the rule, the renderer emits
1868 // its host's idiom, and `error` is what arrives back when someone
1869 // validated. Nothing here decides a value is wrong.
1870 let field = Field {
1871 max_length: Some(100),
1872 min: Some("1"),
1873 max: Some("240"),
1874 required: true,
1875 ..Field::new(FieldKind::Number, "minutes", "Minutes")
1876 };
1877 assert!(!field.invalid());
1878
1879 // A bound is text because it is only a number for some of the kinds
1880 // that take one. goingson has both shapes live.
1881 let when = Field {
1882 min: Some("2026-08-09T14:30"),
1883 ..Field::new(FieldKind::Text, "starts", "Starts")
1884 };
1885 assert_eq!(when.min, Some("2026-08-09T14:30"));
1886 }
1887
1888 #[test]
1889 fn a_meter_keeps_the_over_run_the_percentage_throws_away() {
1890 // The whole reason this is a pair. goingson's `Task::time_progress`
1891 // clamps to 100 and then carries `is_over_estimate` beside it to say
1892 // what the clamp dropped; a meter says both from one fact.
1893 let over = Meter::new(45, 30);
1894 assert_eq!(over.percent(), 100);
1895 assert!(over.overflowing());
1896
1897 let exact = Meter::new(30, 30);
1898 assert_eq!(exact.percent(), over.percent());
1899 assert!(!exact.overflowing());
1900 }
1901
1902 #[test]
1903 fn an_empty_set_does_not_divide_by_zero() {
1904 // Sayable on purpose, so it has to be answerable. A meter over an
1905 // unloaded count is what an app actually has for a frame.
1906 let none = Meter::new(0, 0);
1907 assert_eq!(none.percent(), 0);
1908 assert!(none.is_empty());
1909 assert!(!none.overflowing());
1910 }
1911
1912 #[test]
1913 fn the_ratio_survives_where_a_percentage_would_not() {
1914 // Given 43 nothing can recover "3 of 7", which is why the numbers are
1915 // carried and the label names only the noun.
1916 let m = Meter::new(3, 7).label("subtasks");
1917 assert_eq!(m.percent(), 42);
1918 assert_eq!((m.done, m.total), (3, 7));
1919 assert_eq!(m.label, Some("subtasks"));
1920 }
1921
1922 #[test]
1923 fn tone_is_carried_because_no_renderer_can_derive_it() {
1924 // The same fullness means opposite things on two of goingson's bars,
1925 // and only the app knows which.
1926 let subtasks = Meter::new(9, 10).tone(Tone::Success);
1927 let estimate = Meter::new(9, 10).tone(Tone::Danger);
1928 assert_eq!(subtasks.percent(), estimate.percent());
1929 assert_ne!(subtasks.tone, estimate.tone);
1930 // Untoned by default: a bar says nothing about status until something
1931 // says so, the same way a row is not selectable until told.
1932 assert_eq!(Meter::new(9, 10).tone, Tone::Neutral);
1933 }
1934
1935 #[test]
1936 fn a_meter_does_not_overflow_on_large_counts() {
1937 // done * 100 in u32 would wrap somewhere past 42 million. Counts that
1938 // size are not tasks, but a description layer that silently reports 3%
1939 // for a full bar is worse than one that is slow.
1940 let big = Meter::new(u32::MAX, u32::MAX);
1941 assert_eq!(big.percent(), 100);
1942 assert!(!big.overflowing());
1943 }
1944
1945 #[test]
1946 fn inset_is_raised_with_the_light_moved() {
1947 let (rl, rd) = Bevel::Raised.edges();
1948 let (il, id) = Bevel::Inset.edges();
1949 assert_eq!((rl, rd), (Edge::Light, Edge::Dark));
1950 assert_eq!((il, id), (rd, rl));
1951 }
1952
1953 #[test]
1954 fn pressing_twice_is_a_no_op() {
1955 for b in [Bevel::Raised, Bevel::Inset] {
1956 assert_eq!(b.pressed().pressed(), b);
1957 }
1958 }
1959
1960 #[test]
1961 fn a_raised_region_is_never_filled_with_a_recessed_surface() {
1962 // The bug this vocabulary exists to make unrepresentable.
1963 assert_eq!(Depth::Raised.fill(), Some(Fill::Raised));
1964 assert_eq!(Depth::Raised.bevel(), Some(Bevel::Raised));
1965 assert_eq!(Depth::Well.bevel(), Some(Bevel::Inset));
1966 assert_ne!(Depth::Well.fill(), Depth::Raised.fill());
1967 }
1968
1969 #[test]
1970 fn state_is_orthogonal_to_depth() {
1971 // The reason State is its own axis and not a Depth member: a disabled
1972 // button and a disabled field are both disabled and are not the same
1973 // shape, which one shared variant could not have said.
1974 assert_eq!(Depth::Raised.fill(), Some(Fill::Raised));
1975 assert_eq!(Depth::Well.fill(), Some(Fill::Well));
1976 assert!(State::Disabled.suppresses_interaction());
1977 }
1978
1979 #[test]
1980 fn only_disabled_stops_answering() {
1981 // Focus is a thing you can still click. Getting this backwards is how
1982 // a focus ring ends up on something inert.
1983 assert!(!State::Focus.suppresses_interaction());
1984 assert!(State::Disabled.suppresses_interaction());
1985 }
1986
1987 #[test]
1988 fn both_states_resolve_against_intents_makeover_already_derives() {
1989 // Neither needs a new token, so this costs no `makeover` release.
1990 assert_eq!(State::Focus.token(), "focus-ring");
1991 assert_eq!(State::Disabled.token(), "content-muted");
1992 }
1993
1994 #[test]
1995 fn flat_has_neither_edge_nor_fill() {
1996 assert_eq!(Depth::Flat.bevel(), None);
1997 assert_eq!(Depth::Flat.fill(), None);
1998 }
1999
2000 #[test]
2001 fn sunken_is_recessed_by_colour_with_no_edge() {
2002 // The one member carrying a fill without a bevel. A renderer that
2003 // assumes the two arrive together drops the fill silently, which is
2004 // exactly what makeover-webview did before 0.3.0.
2005 assert_eq!(Depth::Sunken.fill(), Some(Fill::Sunken));
2006 assert_eq!(Depth::Sunken.bevel(), None);
2007 }
2008
2009 #[test]
2010 fn sunken_and_flat_are_different_claims() {
2011 // Both edgeless, and only one of them needs a colour. Collapsing them
2012 // is what left an unchosen tab unsayable.
2013 assert_eq!(Depth::Flat.bevel(), Depth::Sunken.bevel());
2014 assert_ne!(Depth::Flat.fill(), Depth::Sunken.fill());
2015 }
2016
2017 #[test]
2018 fn a_sunken_surface_is_not_a_well() {
2019 // Authored in opposite directions: makeover derives surface-well by
2020 // inverting against the theme's content colour, while surface-sunken is
2021 // authored and may sit darker than raised.
2022 assert_ne!(Fill::Sunken, Fill::Well);
2023 assert_eq!(Fill::Sunken.token(), "surface-sunken");
2024 assert_eq!(Fill::Well.token(), "surface-well");
2025 }
2026
2027 #[test]
2028 fn every_selector_describes_both_of_its_states() {
2029 // The gap 0.3.0 closed. Before it, only `chosen` existed and the
2030 // unchosen option fell through to Flat at every renderer.
2031 for s in [Selector::Tabs, Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2032 assert_ne!(
2033 s.chosen(),
2034 s.unchosen(),
2035 "{s:?} cannot tell picked from unpicked"
2036 );
2037 }
2038 }
2039
2040 #[test]
2041 fn only_a_tab_inverts_the_other_way() {
2042 // Tabs recede so the chosen one comes forward; a segment and a toggle
2043 // stand up so the chosen one is held in. That inversion is the whole
2044 // content of "picked" once colour is deferred, and it is why the three
2045 // are not one member with a flag.
2046 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.unchosen(), Depth::Sunken);
2047 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
2048
2049 for s in [Selector::Segmented, Selector::Toggle] {
2050 assert_eq!(s.unchosen(), Depth::Raised);
2051 assert_eq!(s.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2052 // Held in is what pressing produces: one appearance, two reasons.
2053 assert_eq!(s.unchosen().pressed(), s.chosen());
2054 }
2055 }
2056
2057 #[test]
2058 fn pressing_a_card_makes_a_well() {
2059 assert_eq!(Depth::Raised.pressed(), Depth::Well);
2060 assert_eq!(
2061 Depth::Raised.pressed().bevel(),
2062 Depth::Raised.bevel().map(Bevel::pressed)
2063 );
2064 // Only raised regions respond to being pressed.
2065 assert_eq!(Depth::Flat.pressed(), Depth::Flat);
2066 assert_eq!(Depth::Well.pressed(), Depth::Well);
2067 // An overlay is a surface, not a control.
2068 assert_eq!(Depth::Overlay.pressed(), Depth::Overlay);
2069 }
2070
2071 #[test]
2072 fn an_overlay_is_lifted_rather_than_edged() {
2073 // The wave-2 rule: a surface over the page takes elevation, a surface
2074 // in the page takes a bevel. Both halves come off the one Depth, so
2075 // they cannot disagree.
2076 assert_eq!(Depth::Overlay.fill(), Some(Fill::Overlay));
2077 assert_eq!(Depth::Overlay.bevel(), None);
2078
2079 // Three depths have no bevel and they are not the same claim. Flat has
2080 // nothing to separate from, Sunken's colour is doing the separating,
2081 // and an overlay is separated by the lift.
2082 assert_ne!(Depth::Overlay.fill(), Depth::Sunken.fill());
2083 assert_ne!(Depth::Overlay.fill(), Depth::Flat.fill());
2084 }
2085
2086 #[test]
2087 fn intents_name_makeover_tokens_and_nothing_else() {
2088 assert_eq!(Edge::Light.token(), "bevel-light");
2089 assert_eq!(Edge::Dark.token(), "bevel-dark");
2090 assert_eq!(Fill::Raised.token(), "surface-raised");
2091 assert_eq!(Fill::Well.token(), "surface-well");
2092 // No value ever leaves this crate.
2093 for t in [
2094 Edge::Light.token(),
2095 Edge::Dark.token(),
2096 Tone::Danger.token(),
2097 Tone::Neutral.token(),
2098 State::Focus.token(),
2099 State::Disabled.token(),
2100 ] {
2101 assert!(!t.starts_with('#'), "{t} looks like a value");
2102 assert!(
2103 !t.chars().next().unwrap().is_ascii_digit(),
2104 "{t} is a value"
2105 );
2106 }
2107 }
2108
2109 #[test]
2110 fn a_badge_cannot_be_pressed_and_a_chip_latches() {
2111 // The one line that runs through all three apps' taxonomies.
2112 assert!(!Token::Badge.interactive());
2113 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: false }.interactive());
2114 assert!(Token::Chip { removable: true }.interactive());
2115
2116 // A badge is a label, so giving it an edge would lie about it.
2117 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(false), Depth::Flat);
2118 assert_eq!(Token::Badge.depth(true), Depth::Flat);
2119
2120 // A latched chip wears the same shape a pressed one does.
2121 let chip = Token::Chip { removable: false };
2122 assert_eq!(chip.depth(false), Depth::Raised);
2123 assert_eq!(chip.depth(true), Depth::Raised.pressed());
2124 }
2125
2126 #[test]
2127 fn a_toast_and_a_banner_differ_in_more_than_placement() {
2128 assert!(Notice::Toast.transient());
2129 assert!(!Notice::Banner.transient());
2130 // A toast floats above the page; a banner rests in the flow.
2131 assert_eq!(Notice::Toast.fill(), Fill::Overlay);
2132 assert_eq!(Notice::Banner.fill(), Fill::Raised);
2133 }
2134
2135 #[test]
2136 fn emphasis_falls_off_down_the_row() {
2137 // `revealed_on_hover` was asserted here until 0.13.0 retired it. It said
2138 // a row's actions stay hidden until hover, which stopped being true when
2139 // makeover-webview 0.23.0 showed them at rest, and nothing had consumed
2140 // it for a release either way.
2141 assert_eq!(RowPart::Primary.intent(), "content");
2142 assert_eq!(RowPart::Secondary.intent(), "content-secondary");
2143 assert_eq!(RowPart::Meta.intent(), "content-muted");
2144 }
2145
2146 #[test]
2147 fn a_token_part_carries_no_intent_of_its_own() {
2148 // Each token carries its own tone, so a part-level intent underneath
2149 // would fight the thing sitting on it. Same reasoning as actions, which
2150 // is why they answer alike.
2151 assert_eq!(RowPart::Tokens.intent(), RowPart::Actions.intent());
2152 assert_eq!(RowPart::Tokens.intent(), "content");
2153 }
2154
2155 #[test]
2156 fn a_cell_part_names_an_intent_and_only_the_value_is_text() {
2157 // The table half of what RowPart::intent does for rows. A cell holding
2158 // a control and a cell holding text answered alike until 0.14.0, and a
2159 // control in a cell took the cell's text colour.
2160 assert_eq!(CellPart::Value.intent(), "content");
2161
2162 for part in [CellPart::Tokens, CellPart::Actions, CellPart::Link] {
2163 // Each for its own reason -- a token carries its tone, an action is
2164 // a control, a link takes the action colour -- and all three reach
2165 // the intent inheriting already gives.
2166 assert_eq!(part.intent(), CellPart::Value.intent(), "{part:?}");
2167 }
2168 }
2169
2170 #[test]
2171 fn every_cell_part_answers_with_a_token_and_never_a_value() {
2172 for part in [
2173 CellPart::Value,
2174 CellPart::Tokens,
2175 CellPart::Actions,
2176 CellPart::Link,
2177 ] {
2178 let intent = part.intent();
2179 assert!(!intent.is_empty(), "{part:?} names nothing");
2180 assert!(!intent.starts_with('#'), "{part:?} looks like a value");
2181 }
2182 }
2183
2184 #[test]
2185 fn a_separator_is_what_tells_a_section_from_a_subsection() {
2186 assert!(Heading::Section.separated());
2187 assert!(!Heading::Subsection.separated());
2188 assert!(!Heading::Page.separated());
2189 }
2190
2191 #[test]
2192 fn a_chosen_segment_is_held_in_and_a_chosen_tab_comes_forward() {
2193 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2194 assert_eq!(Selector::Toggle.chosen(), Depth::Well);
2195 // The exception, and the whole folder semantic: the open tab joins its
2196 // pane rather than sinking away from it.
2197 assert_eq!(Selector::Tabs.chosen(), Depth::Raised);
2198
2199 // A held-in segment is indistinguishable from a pressed raised one,
2200 // which is the economy the light model buys over a colour swap.
2201 assert_eq!(Selector::Segmented.chosen(), Depth::Raised.pressed());
2202
2203 // A toggle stands alone; the other two are built out of parts that
2204 // touch.
2205 assert!(Selector::Segmented.abutting());
2206 assert!(Selector::Tabs.abutting());
2207 assert!(!Selector::Toggle.abutting());
2208 }
2209
2210 #[test]
2211 fn a_pane_is_looked_into_and_a_band_is_not() {
2212 assert_eq!(Region::Pane.depth(), Depth::Well);
2213 assert_eq!(Region::Modal.depth(), Depth::Raised);
2214 for r in [
2215 Region::Band,
2216 Region::Sidebar,
2217 Region::Split,
2218 Region::TabGroup,
2219 ] {
2220 assert_eq!(r.depth(), Depth::Flat, "{r:?} should carry no edge");
2221 }
2222 }
2223
2224 #[test]
2225 fn exactly_one_region_is_opaque() {
2226 // The escape hatch is one member and stays one member. If a second
2227 // undescribed region ever appears, the description has started
2228 // conceding rather than deferring.
2229 for r in [
2230 Region::Band,
2231 Region::Sidebar,
2232 Region::Pane,
2233 Region::Split,
2234 Region::TabGroup,
2235 Region::Modal,
2236 ] {
2237 assert!(r.described(), "{r:?} should be describable");
2238 }
2239 assert!(!Region::Bespoke { name: "day-plan" }.described());
2240 }
2241
2242 #[test]
2243 fn a_bespoke_region_inherits_its_depth_rather_than_choosing_one() {
2244 // The app owns the contents, not the placement. An app that wants its
2245 // timeline in a well frames it in a Pane.
2246 assert_eq!(Region::Bespoke { name: "day-plan" }.depth(), Depth::Flat);
2247 assert_eq!(Region::Bespoke { name: "kanban" }.depth(), Depth::Flat);
2248 }
2249
2250 #[test]
2251 fn a_screen_with_a_bespoke_region_is_still_a_whole_screen() {
2252 // The argument the member exists for: goingson's day-plan has to be
2253 // routable, or the description covers only the boring screens and the
2254 // interesting four need a second path beside the router.
2255 let day_plan = [
2256 Region::Band,
2257 Region::Bespoke { name: "day-plan" },
2258 Region::Sidebar,
2259 ];
2260 assert_eq!(day_plan.iter().filter(|r| r.described()).count(), 2);
2261 assert_eq!(day_plan.iter().filter(|r| !r.described()).count(), 1);
2262 }
2263
2264 #[test]
2265 fn a_secret_field_is_marked_as_one_and_a_hidden_field_is_not_drawn() {
2266 let secret = Field::new(FieldKind::Secret, "password", "Password");
2267 assert!(secret.kind.confidential());
2268 assert!(secret.kind.visible());
2269
2270 assert!(!FieldKind::Hidden.visible());
2271 // Nothing else is confidential, or the marker means nothing.
2272 for k in [
2273 FieldKind::Text,
2274 FieldKind::Number,
2275 FieldKind::Textarea,
2276 FieldKind::Select,
2277 FieldKind::Checkbox,
2278 FieldKind::Hidden,
2279 ] {
2280 assert!(!k.confidential(), "{k:?} should not be confidential");
2281 }
2282
2283 // Only a checkbox carries its own label.
2284 assert!(FieldKind::Checkbox.labels_itself());
2285 assert!(!FieldKind::Text.labels_itself());
2286 }
2287
2288 #[test]
2289 fn a_plain_field_offers_nothing_and_a_select_offers_its_options() {
2290 let text = Field::new(FieldKind::Text, "title", "Title");
2291 assert!(text.options.is_empty());
2292 assert_eq!(text.placeholder, None);
2293
2294 let sizes = [Choice::plain("small"), Choice::plain("large")];
2295 let select = Field::select("size", "Size", &sizes);
2296 assert_eq!(select.kind, FieldKind::Select);
2297 assert_eq!(select.options.len(), 2);
2298 }
2299
2300 #[test]
2301 fn a_choice_says_what_submits_and_what_is_read_apart() {
2302 // The whole reason it is two strings. `plain` is the case where they
2303 // coincide, and it is a shorthand rather than the general shape.
2304 let plain = Choice::plain("7");
2305 assert_eq!((plain.value, plain.label), ("7", "7"));
2306
2307 let spelled = Choice {
2308 value: "7",
2309 label: "One week",
2310 };
2311 assert_ne!(spelled.value, spelled.label);
2312 }
2313
2314 #[test]
2315 fn a_radio_asks_the_same_question_as_a_select_and_is_not_the_same_kind() {
2316 // Both offer a fixed set and both read `options`, so the two
2317 // constructors differ in exactly one thing. That one thing is the
2318 // point: a renderer decides whether the alternatives are readable
2319 // without opening anything, and it can only decide that if the
2320 // description said which question was asked.
2321 let styles = [
2322 Choice {
2323 value: "copy",
2324 label: "Copy samples in",
2325 },
2326 Choice {
2327 value: "reference",
2328 label: "Reference in place",
2329 },
2330 ];
2331 let radio = Field::radio("storage", "Storage style", &styles);
2332 let select = Field::select("storage", "Storage style", &styles);
2333
2334 assert_eq!(radio.kind, FieldKind::Radio);
2335 assert_ne!(radio.kind, select.kind);
2336 assert_eq!(radio.options, select.options);
2337 assert_eq!(
2338 Field {
2339 kind: select.kind,
2340 ..radio
2341 },
2342 select
2343 );
2344 }
2345
2346 #[test]
2347 fn exactly_the_option_taking_kinds_say_so() {
2348 // The renderers branch on this rather than on a list of their own, so
2349 // a kind added without a decision here renders its options nowhere.
2350 assert!(FieldKind::Select.offers_options());
2351 assert!(FieldKind::Radio.offers_options());
2352 for kind in [
2353 FieldKind::Text,
2354 FieldKind::Secret,
2355 FieldKind::Number,
2356 FieldKind::Email,
2357 FieldKind::Url,
2358 FieldKind::Tel,
2359 FieldKind::Textarea,
2360 FieldKind::Checkbox,
2361 FieldKind::Hidden,
2362 ] {
2363 assert!(!kind.offers_options(), "{kind:?} does not offer options");
2364 }
2365 }
2366
2367 #[test]
2368 fn a_radio_group_takes_a_label_even_though_its_options_carry_their_own() {
2369 // The near-miss: each option is labelled beside its own button, so a
2370 // renderer could plausibly read the group as self-labelling and drop
2371 // the question. Checkbox is the only kind that does that.
2372 assert!(!FieldKind::Radio.labels_itself());
2373 assert!(FieldKind::Checkbox.labels_itself());
2374 }
2375
2376 #[test]
2377 fn a_select_with_no_options_is_sayable() {
2378 // An app whose option list has not loaded has exactly this. Making it
2379 // unrepresentable would push the state somewhere less visible, and a
2380 // renderer drawing an empty select reports it on screen.
2381 let loading = Field::select("project", "Project", &[]);
2382 assert!(loading.options.is_empty());
2383 }
2384
2385 #[test]
2386 fn the_description_carries_the_question_and_never_the_answer() {
2387 // The line 0.8.0 drew. Placeholder and options are properties of what
2388 // is being asked; the current value is what came back, and no field
2389 // here holds one.
2390 let f = Field {
2391 placeholder: Some("yyyy-mm-dd"),
2392 ..Field::new(FieldKind::Text, "due", "Due")
2393 };
2394 assert_eq!(f.placeholder, Some("yyyy-mm-dd"));
2395 // A placeholder is not a label, and having one does not excuse the
2396 // field from carrying the other.
2397 assert_eq!(f.label, "Due");
2398 }
2399
2400 #[test]
2401 fn a_field_reports_its_own_error_state() {
2402 let mut f = Field::new(FieldKind::Text, "title", "Title");
2403 assert!(!f.invalid());
2404 f.error = Some("Required");
2405 assert!(f.invalid());
2406 }
2407
2408 #[test]
2409 fn columns_drop_by_priority_and_never_by_position() {
2410 let cols = [
2411 Column {
2412 width: Width::Fill,
2413 priority: Priority::Essential,
2414 ..Column::new("Title")
2415 },
2416 Column {
2417 width: Width::Fixed,
2418 priority: Priority::Secondary,
2419 ..Column::new("Due")
2420 },
2421 Column {
2422 width: Width::Fixed,
2423 priority: Priority::Optional,
2424 ..Column::new("Estimate")
2425 },
2426 ];
2427
2428 // Widest: everything survives.
2429 assert_eq!(
2430 cols.iter()
2431 .filter(|c| c.kept_at(Priority::Optional))
2432 .count(),
2433 3
2434 );
2435 // Narrower: the optional column goes first.
2436 let kept: Vec<_> = cols
2437 .iter()
2438 .filter(|c| c.kept_at(Priority::Secondary))
2439 .map(|c| c.name)
2440 .collect();
2441 assert_eq!(kept, ["Title", "Due"]);
2442 // Narrowest: only what identifies the row.
2443 let kept: Vec<_> = cols
2444 .iter()
2445 .filter(|c| c.kept_at(Priority::Essential))
2446 .map(|c| c.name)
2447 .collect();
2448 assert_eq!(kept, ["Title"]);
2449 }
2450
2451 #[test]
2452 fn inserting_a_column_does_not_move_what_gets_dropped() {
2453 // The bug the ordinal form has and this form cannot: goingson hides
2454 // `nth-child(n+5)` against a seven-column table, so a column inserted
2455 // anywhere to the left silently hides a different one.
2456 let before = [
2457 Column::new("Title"),
2458 Column {
2459 width: Width::Fixed,
2460 priority: Priority::Optional,
2461 ..Column::new("Estimate")
2462 },
2463 ];
2464 let after = [
2465 Column::new("Title"),
2466 Column::new("Project"), // inserted
2467 Column {
2468 width: Width::Fixed,
2469 priority: Priority::Optional,
2470 ..Column::new("Estimate")
2471 },
2472 ];
2473
2474 fn dropped<'a>(cols: &[Column<'a>]) -> Vec<&'a str> {
2475 cols.iter()
2476 .filter(|c| !c.kept_at(Priority::Secondary))
2477 .map(|c| c.name)
2478 .collect()
2479 }
2480 assert_eq!(dropped(&before), ["Estimate"]);
2481 assert_eq!(dropped(&after), ["Estimate"]);
2482 }
2483
2484 #[test]
2485 fn an_arrangement_carries_the_tab_group_as_a_modifier() {
2486 // goingson uses the tab group inside the content region rather than
2487 // instead of one, so it is not a third arrangement.
2488 let go = Arrangement::ListDetail { tabbed: true };
2489 let plain = Arrangement::ListDetail { tabbed: false };
2490 assert_ne!(go, plain);
2491 assert_ne!(go, Arrangement::SidebarContent);
2492 }
2493
2494 #[test]
2495 fn readiness_names_the_state_and_not_the_shimmer() {
2496 // Two members and no third. If a skeleton ever appears in this enum,
2497 // the deferral rule has been broken.
2498 assert_ne!(Readiness::Ready, Readiness::Pending);
2499 }
2500}