pub unsafe extern "C" fn time2posix_z(
tz: TimezoneT,
t: TimeT,
) -> TimeTExpand description
Convert from POSIX to leap-second time_ts.
Rust interface for the C function:
time_t time2posix_z(timezone_t, time_t);IEEE Standard 1003.1 (POSIX) requires the time_t value 536457599 to stand for
1986-12-31 23:59:59 UTC. This effectively implies that POSIX time_t values
cannot include leap seconds and, therefore, that the system time must be
adjusted as each leap occurs.
If the time package is configured with leap-second support enabled, however, no
such adjustment is needed and time_t values continue to increase over leap
events (as a true “seconds since…” value). This means that these values will
differ from those required by POSIX by the net number of leap seconds inserted
since the Epoch.
Typically this is not a problem as the type time_t is intended to be (mostly)
opaque—time_t values should only be obtained-from and passed-to functions
such as time(2), localtime(3), mktime(3), and difftime(3). However,
POSIX gives an arithmetic expression for directly computing a time_t value
from a given date/time, and the same relationship is assumed by some (usually
older) applications. Any programs creating/dissecting time_t values using
such a relationship will typically not handle intervals over leap seconds
correctly.
The time2posix and posix2time functions are provided to address this
time_t mismatch by converting between local time_t values and their POSIX
equivalents. This is done by accounting for the number of time- base changes
that would have taken place on a POSIX system as leap seconds were inserted or
deleted. These converted values can then be used in lieu of correcting the
older applications, or when communicating with POSIX-compliant systems.
The time2posix function is single-valued. That is, every local time_t
corresponds to a single POSIX time_t. The posix2time function is less
well-behaved: for a positive leap second hit the result is not unique, and for a
negative leap second hit the corresponding POSIX time_t doesn’t exist so an
adjacent value is returned. Both of these are good indicators of the
inferiority of the POSIX representation.
The following table summarizes the relationship between a time T and its conversion to, and back from, the POSIX representation over the leap second inserted at the end of June, 1993.
| DATE | TIME | T | X=time2posix(T) | posix2time(X) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93/06/30 | 23:59:59 | A+0 | B+0 | A+0 |
| 93/06/30 | 23:59:60 | A+1 | B+1 | A+1 or A+2 |
| 93/07/01 | 00:00:00 | A+2 | B+1 | A+1 or A+2 |
| 93/07/01 | 00:00:01 | A+3 | B+2 | A+3 |
A leap second deletion would look like…
| DATE | TIME | T | X=time2posix(T) | posix2time(X) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ??/06/30 | 23:59:58 | A+0 | B+0 | A+0 |
| ??/07/01 | 00:00:00 | A+1 | B+2 | A+1 |
| ??/07/01 | 00:00:01 | A+2 | B+3 | A+2 |
Note: posix2time(B+1) => A+0 or A+1
If leap-second support is not enabled, local time_t and POSIX time_t values
are equivalent, and both time2posix and posix2time degenerate to the
identity function.