Crate lemon_tree[][src]

Famous Lemon Parser Generator, designed as library that builds your parser transparently during cargo build. To describe parser rules you add annotation attributes to rust functions, structs and enums.

You can find usage examples here.

Let's say we want to create Lemon parser like this:

%token_type {f64}
%left PLUS

Unit ::= Expr(expr).
Expr ::= VALUE(value).
Expr ::= Expr(a) PLUS Expr(b).

We want that Unit and Expr will be represented by the following types in rust:

struct Unit
{	expr: Expr,
}

struct Expr
{	value: f64,
}

Every symbol except the start symbol we need to annotate with #[derive(LemonTreeNode)], and the start symbol with #[derive(LemonTree)]. Parser rules that return this symbol we put into #[lem()] annotation attributes. All #[derive(LemonTreeNode)], #[derive(LemonTree)] and #[lem_fn()] attributes that describe single Lemon parser must be contained in single rust file, and the #[derive(LemonTree)] must come the last.

#[derive(LemonTreeNode)]
#[lem("VALUE(value)")]
pub struct Expr
{	value: f64,
}

#[derive(LemonTree)]
#[lem("Expr(expr)")]
pub struct Unit
{	expr: Expr,
}

The #[lem()] attribute can appear multiple times, and each attribute can contain multiple rules, like #[lem("A(value)", "B(value)")].

Each rule will produce code that creates new struct instance. Aliases given in parentheses will be assigned to struct fields. If a struct has more fields than appear in expression, the remaining fields will be set to Default::default(), so they need to implement std::default::Default trait. Existing fields will be assigned like this: Type {field: value.into()}. So field type in struct can be the type of value, or compatible with it.

In example above, there's one Lemon rule, that doesn't return the final result, but needs to perform some calculation. We expect that rule Expr ::= Expr(a) PLUS Expr(b) will produce type Expr {value: a.value + b.value}. We can implement this rule as rust function:

#[lem_fn("Expr(a) PLUS Expr(b)")]
pub fn expr_1(a: Expr, b: Expr) -> Expr
{	Expr {value: a.value + b.value}
}

So #[lem_fn()] attribute creates parser rule, whose action is module-global function call. The return type of such function will be the left-hand side symbol in Lemon rule, like Expr ::= Expr(a) PLUS Expr(b).

To specify Lemon parser directives, like %token_type {f64}, need to use #[lem_opt()] attributes near start symbol, like #[lem_opt(token_type="f64")].

Here is complete example:

use lemon_tree::{lem_fn, LemonTree, LemonTreeNode};

#[derive(LemonTreeNode, Debug)]
#[lem("VALUE(value)")]
pub struct Expr
{	value: f64,
}

#[lem_fn("Expr(a) PLUS Expr(b)")]
pub fn expr_1(a: Expr, b: Expr) -> Expr
{	Expr {value: a.value + b.value}
}

#[derive(LemonTree, Debug)]
#[lem("Expr(expr)")]
#[lem_opt(token_type="f64", left="PLUS")]
pub struct Unit
{	expr: Expr,
}

fn main()
{	let mut parser = Unit::get_parser(());
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::VALUE, 10.0).unwrap();
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::PLUS, 0.0).unwrap();
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::VALUE, 20.0).unwrap();
	let result = parser.end().unwrap();
	assert_eq!(result.expr.value, 30.0);
	println!("Result: {:?}", result);
}

Enums can be used as symbol types as well. With enums need to put #[lem()] parser rules near enum variants. Example:

use lemon_tree::{lem_fn, LemonTree, LemonTreeNode};

#[derive(LemonTreeNode, Debug, PartialEq)]
pub enum Expr
{	#[lem("VALUE(0)")]
	Value(f64),

	#[lem("Expr(0) PLUS Expr(1)")]
	Plus(Box<Expr>, Box<Expr>), // the generated action will look like: Expr::Plus(arg_0.into(), arg_1.into())
}

#[derive(LemonTree, Debug, PartialEq)]
#[lem("Expr(expr)")]
#[lem_opt(token_type="f64", left="PLUS")]
pub struct Unit
{	expr: Expr,
}

fn main()
{	let mut parser = Unit::get_parser(());
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::VALUE, 10.0).unwrap();
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::PLUS, 0.0).unwrap();
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::VALUE, 20.0).unwrap();
	let result = parser.end().unwrap();
	assert_eq!
	(	result,
		Unit
		{	expr: Expr::Plus
			(	Box::new(Expr::Value(10.0)),
				Box::new(Expr::Value(20.0)),
			)
		}
	);
	println!("Result: {:?}", result);
}

Notice, that in Expr::Plus action, Expr object magically converted to Box<Expr>, because Box<T> implements From<T>, so into() can be used to convert.

What if we want to do more complex conversion? Actually we can convert anything to anything, if we manually implement an Into<T> trait. Example:

use lemon_tree::{lem_fn, LemonTree, LemonTreeNode};

#[derive(LemonTreeNode, Debug, PartialEq)]
pub enum Expr
{	#[lem("VALUE(0)")]
	Value(f64),

	#[lem("Expr(0) PLUS Expr(1)")]
	Plus(String, String),
}

impl Into<String> for Expr
{	fn into(self) -> String
	{	match self
		{	Expr::Value(v) => format!("{}", v),
			Expr::Plus(a, b) => format!("{} + {}", a, b),
		}
	}
}

#[derive(LemonTree, Debug, PartialEq)]
#[lem("Expr(expr)")]
#[lem_opt(token_type="f64", left="PLUS")]
pub struct Unit
{	expr: Expr,
}

fn main()
{	let mut parser = Unit::get_parser(());
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::VALUE, 10.0).unwrap();
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::PLUS, 0.0).unwrap();
	parser.add_token(<Unit as LemonTree>::Token::VALUE, 20.0).unwrap();
	let result = parser.end().unwrap();
	assert_eq!
	(	result,
		Unit
		{	expr: Expr::Plus("10".to_string(), "20".to_string())
		}
	);
	println!("Result: {:?}", result);
}

Traits

LemonTree

Parser "start symbol" can be represented as a struct or enum. You need to annotate it with #[derive(LemonTree)], and implementation of this trait will be generated.

LemonTreeNode

For nonterminal symbols, except start symbol.

Attribute Macros

lem_fn

Makes module-global public function an action for specified Lemon parser expression.

Derive Macros

LemonTree

Makes enum/struct a start symbol of current parser. Must appear the last parser attribute in file.

LemonTreeNode

Makes enum/struct a regular nonterminal symbol. Must appear before #[derive(LemonTree)] and #[lem_fn()] in the same rust file.