Crate gravitics 

gravitics

Gravitics is what the 1950s called the search for gravity control. This crate computes that whole parallel track of physics, and gravity’s open anomalies, three ways:

• The proposal’s own model, from its authors’ formulas and inputs, reproducing their published numbers: superconductor gravity, high-frequency gravitational-wave generators and detectors, propellantless thrusters, warp drives, the polarizable vacuum, MOND and Weber-like gravity.
• The standard prediction, from general relativity or standard physics, for the same setup.
• What experiments measured.

It also carries the general-relativity side that light near strong gravity needs: exact light deflection at any field strength, deflection by a body’s whole multipole field, and black-hole shadows.

Use it to explore a proposal, to design an experiment that could test one, or to see how large an effect must be before an instrument can see it.

Install

cargo add gravitics

Example: one proposal, both tracks

use gravitics::superconductors::{TAJMAR_REPORTED, ring_frame_dragging};

// Tajmar & de Matos's spinning niobium ring (0.349 kg, radii 75 and 69 mm).
// Their measurement: the frame turned with 2.6×10⁻⁵ of the ring's rotation.
// General relativity, for the same ring: 7.2×10⁻²⁷.
let gr = ring_frame_dragging(0.349, 0.075, 0.069);
println!("reported {TAJMAR_REPORTED:.1e}, general relativity {gr:.1e}"); // 2.6e-5, 7.2e-27
assert!(TAJMAR_REPORTED / gr > 1e21);

use gravitics::propulsion::{photon_thrust, shawyer_thrust};

// An EmDrive cavity at Dresden's settings: Shawyer's model against a photon rocket.
let model = shawyer_thrust(11.0, 741.0, 0.56); // 30 µN
let light = photon_thrust(11.0);               // 0.037 µN
assert!(model / light > 800.0); // Dresden measured less than 0.03 µN

Example: an anomaly against the test that decides it

use gravitics::anomalies::{LLR_ABSORPTION_BOUND, MAJORANA_ABSORPTION, column_density, flyby_anderson, shielding_loss};

// Majorana's gravitational shielding would hide 4.6% of the Sun behind the Earth at eclipse;
// lunar laser ranging allows 7×10⁻¹².
let earth = column_density(6_371e3, 5514.0);
assert!(shielding_loss(MAJORANA_ABSORPTION, earth) > 0.04);
assert!(shielding_loss(LLR_ABSORPTION_BOUND, earth) < 1e-11);

// Anderson's flyby formula reproduces NEAR's 13.3 mm/s, and predicted +6 mm/s for Juno,
// which showed 0 ± 0.8 mm/s.
let near = flyby_anderson(6851.0, (-20.76f64).to_radians(), (-71.96f64).to_radians());
assert!((near * 1e3 - 13.28).abs() < 0.01);

The proposals

Proposal	Its own model or report	General relativity or standard physics	What experiments found
Tajmar: frame dragging near a spinning superconductor	k = 2.6×10⁻⁵	7.2×10⁻²⁷	Tajmar’s own later limit is 800× below the first signal; traced to vibration
Podkletnov: weight change above a spinning superconductor	up to −2.1%	a weight increase of at most 3×10⁻⁹	no change above 2×10⁻⁸ (NASA Marshall)
Li–Baker: a GHz gravitational-wave detector	a signal in 3×10³ s	one signal photon in 3×10¹⁸ s, against the reference beam’s shot noise (JASON’s argument)	none built
Pais: 10²⁴ W/m² from a charged disc	σ = 5×10⁴ C/m²	a surface field 5.6×10⁶ times the breakdown limit his patent states	Navy test (2016–19): effect not shown
Zhang: a varying field makes gravity (US 12,417,870)	a ring weighs ±1 g at 55 kV: 2.6×10⁻² m/s²; his vortex ∇×A = B/f with his three constants spins things up at 10⁻²¹ rad/s², or at 10²⁹ rad/s² in Earth’s own field; his G is 6.685×10⁻¹¹	the live wire’s polarisation pull, 0.1–0.7 g toward whichever side is live; a charged ball on a thread turns and swings by tens of degrees and a quarter millimetre; general relativity: 10⁻²⁷ m/s²	his G is 34σ above every measurement; the rigs not independently replicated
EmDrive	1.2 mN/kW (Eagleworks)	a photon rocket gives 3.3 µN/kW	nothing above 10–30 nN (Dresden)
Mach-effect thruster	“a couple of µN”	the authors’ own formula in SI: about 0.1 µN; general relativity suppresses the Machian term by 10⁻³⁶	vibration artefacts (Dresden)
Lifters (“electrogravitics”)	lift	ion wind, F = I·d/μ	no force in vacuum
Warp drive (Alcubierre)	travel faster than light	negative energy of a galaxy or more, in walls quantum field theory allows	—
Polarizable vacuum (Puthoff)	gravity as a vacuum index	agrees with general relativity at first order, differs at second	0.73 µas apart for light grazing the Sun
Forward’s antigravity	an induced pull from accelerated mass	real in general relativity, with coupling G/c² = 7.4×10⁻²⁸ m/kg	—

The anomalies

Anomaly	The claim	The test	Status
The value of G	16 measurements span 551 ppm	Birge ratio 3.6 against their errors	open: a measurement problem
Earth flybys	Anderson’s formula fits six	Juno: +6 mm/s predicted, 0 ± 0.8 observed	failed out of sample
Gravitational shielding	Majorana’s 6.7×10⁻¹² cm²/g	lunar laser ranging: below 10⁻²² m²/kg	refuted
Pioneer	a constant 8.7×10⁻¹⁰ m/s²	it decayed with the plutonium’s heat	resolved: thermal recoil
MOND	one acceleration scale, g† = 1.2×10⁻¹⁰ m/s²	wide binaries	contested
Short-range forces	new physics below a millimetre	Eöt-Wash: no gravitational-strength force beyond 38.6 µm	open below 38.6 µm
Diósi–Penrose collapse	spontaneous X-rays	none seen underground	parameter-free version refuted

What is inside

Module	What it computes
electrogravity	The pulsed-field gravity claims against the forces in the same rig: dielectrophoresis (dilute and on a sphere), the Pauthenier charge, the polarisation-torque ceiling, spheroid depolarisation and the torque on a body not quite round, the image force, a thread’s torsion, field angular momentum, the Thomson–Purcell kink field that Zhang’s theory relabels, the carriers’ drift (the theory’s own bound), the gravity of field energy, Zhang’s constants (k_mq, μ_g, his vortex constant and spin-up), and the mass-independence discriminator
electrodes	The field of high-voltage rigs: coil turns as charged rings and wires as straight segments, with potential and field in closed form (elliptic integrals, logarithms) and the charge on each piece for given potentials
gem	Gravitoelectromagnetism in three conventions with the spin-2 factor, the gravitomagnetic dipole as a Field, the Lense–Thirring drag of orbits and gyroscopes (LAGEOS, LARES, Gravity Probe B), the extremal charge-to-mass ratio, and Blackett’s magnetism-from-spin
anomalies	CODATA 2022’s sixteen G measurements with their correlations, their generalised-least-squares mean and Birge ratio; Anderson’s flyby formula; column densities and shielding against Majorana and lunar laser ranging; Pioneer’s thermal decay
modified	The radial acceleration relation (McGaugh et al. 2016), Tully–Fisher velocity and MOND radius; Yukawa forces with the current limits (Lee et al. 2020), the dark-energy length and boson mass; Einstein–Cartan density; Weber-like perihelion and mass shift
equivalence	Tests of the equivalence principle: the Eötvös parameter η, the MICROSCOPE, Eöt-Wash and atom-interferometer results, the coupling to B, L or B − L that a bound on η allows for a vector or scalar boson, and the Yukawa form factor of a layered sphere (Touboul et al. 2022; Fayet 2025)
quantum	Bose–Marletto–Vedral entanglement phases (Bose et al. 2017); the Diósi–Penrose X-ray rate (Donadi et al. 2021)
hfgw	High-frequency gravitational waves: the Li–Baker detector (flux conventions, graviton rate, the interference signal, the shot-noise time) and the Pais patents (radiated flux, surface field, magnetic conversion as he uses it and in SI)
superconductors	The London moment; frame dragging of a ring in general relativity against Tajmar’s report; the Cooper-pair density and gravitational London depth; a perfect shield’s shadow; Podkletnov’s pendulum and Marx bank; the measured bounds
propulsion	Ion wind and ion mobility, the vacuum (ballistic) limit, the photon rocket, Shawyer’s EmDrive formula, buoyancy on a balance, Woodward’s Mach-effect thrust and general relativity’s bound on it (Rodal)
spacetime	Alcubierre warp-bubble energy (Pfenning & Ford 1997), the quantum inequality, Casimir plates and spheres, wormhole tensions, light bending in Puthoff’s polarizable vacuum against general relativity, to second order and exactly at any field strength (Darwin’s integral, checked against Bozza 2002 and Iyer & Petters 2007), Forward’s induced acceleration, and horizon temperatures (Unruh, Hawking, Gibbons–Hawking) with black-hole lifetimes and zero-point energy; deflection by a body’s whole gravity field from geopotential coefficients (the Born integral, with J₂ adding 239 µas at Jupiter’s limb); black-hole shadows: the Schwarzschild diameter, the EHT’s deviation δ, and the Kerr shadow seen from the pole (EHT Sgr A* Paper VI; Teo 2003); the Kerr Hawking temperature and the Kerr shadow at any inclination (Bardeen’s curve, Johannsen & Psaltis’s mean radius)
strong_field	The Schwinger limit: the critical field, the pair-production and vacuum-decay rates, laser a₀ and the quantum parameter χ (with explicit intensity conventions), Ritus–Narozhny, Breit–Wheeler suppression, vacuum birefringence, Euler–Heisenberg, supercritical atoms, the graphene analogue, and the QCD field scales (eB in GeV², Heaviside–Lorentz eV², and the Λ⁴ energy-density field). The Schwinger exponent is exactly a Boltzmann factor at twice the Unruh temperature, and a test pins that identity

A warp bubble’s negative energy grows as its wall thins. Quantum field theory allows walls only about 100 Planck lengths thick, where a 100 m bubble needs billions of times the ordinary matter in the observable universe.

Thrust per watt: the propellantless proposals, a photon rocket, ion wind, and the best measurement.

The research behind every number, with its sources and the status of each proposal, is in the reports on fringe physics and the DIRDs, the Coulomb barrier and the Schwinger limit and where gravity physics is still open.

Applications

• Evaluating a proposal. Compute a claim in its authors’ own terms, the standard prediction for the same apparatus, and the measurement, as agency reviews have done; the gap is the answer. examples/electrogravity_claim.rs does this for the pulsed-field gravity claims and names the experiment that would settle them; physica’s gravity_patent example rebuilds the rig of US 12,417,870 with electrodes and simulates the ball under every force and torque.
• Designing an experiment. anomalies::tension and magnets-style systematics show what a precision gravity measurement must control; modified carries the current short-range bounds.
• Planning a strong-field campaign. strong_field gives the Schwinger field, the quantum parameter a beam reaches, and how far the best lasers remain from vacuum breakdown.
• Teaching the analogy honestly. gem gives gravitoelectromagnetism in three conventions that agree, with the spin-2 factor where it belongs.

How it is checked

Every test reproduces a published number from the paper’s own inputs, mostly to better than 1%:

• Proposals: the Li–Baker graviton flux and Table I signal; the Pais disc and conversion numbers; Tajmar’s predicted field for niobium; Podkletnov’s pendulum tables; Woodward’s printed 1.87×10²¹ prefactor; Shawyer’s thrust at the Dresden and Eagleworks settings; the Army lifter thrust.
• Frame dragging: LAGEOS’s and LARES’s node drags (31 and 118 mas/yr, Ciufolini et al. 2013) and Gravity Probe B’s 39.2 mas/yr towards IM Pegasi (Everitt et al. 2011).
• Spacetime: Pfenning & Ford’s warp energy; the quantum inequality; the Casimir pressure at 1 µm; the Sun’s 1.7512″ light bending; Unruh, Hawking and Gibbons–Hawking temperatures.
• Strong fields: the Schwinger field and pair rates, CoReLS’s a₀, LUXE’s χ, PVLAS’s QED birefringence, and Dirac binding for lead and uranium.
• Anomalies: CODATA 2022’s G (6.674 30, Birge ratio 3.61, χ² = 195.7 for 15 degrees of freedom) rebuilt from its inputs; Anderson’s six flyby predictions; Majorana and LLR shielding.
• Alternatives: the RAR’s published shape and deep-MOND limit; Eöt-Wash’s 5.1 meV boson; Ruggiero & Tartaglia’s Einstein–Cartan densities; the Weber perihelion ratios against a direct orbit integration.
• Equivalence principle: MICROSCOPE’s final η; Fayet’s coupling limits on B, L and B − L for both spins, his form factors (homogeneous and five-shell Earth) and their weakening at 710 km.
• Quantum gravity: Bose et al.’s phases; Donadi et al.’s germanium rate.

The formulas were independently re-derived from their sources and every test value recomputed; the Casimir formulas are also checked against each other.

One of eight crates in physica: physica (all of them, plus cross-domain analogies) · metrology (constants) · geopotential (the gravity field) · gravimetry (missions and GRACE) · gravitational (waves) · gravitics (frontier gravity) · magnetics (magnetism and MHD) · plasmoid (fusion plasma).

Modules

anomalies

Gravity’s open anomalies, each set against the measurement that tests it: the scatter of the measured Newtonian constant, the Earth-flyby speed changes, gravitational shielding and the Pioneer acceleration.

electrodes

The electric field of high-voltage rigs: coil turns as charged rings about the z axis, and wires, leads and gaps as straight charged segments anywhere, with the charge on each piece solved from the potentials the rig applies.

electrogravity

Claims that a pulsed high-voltage or time-varying magnetic field makes a local gravitational field, computed against the classical forces that act in the same apparatus.

equivalence

Tests of the weak equivalence principle: the Eötvös parameter η, what the best experiments measured, and how strongly a new long-range force may couple to baryon or lepton number before MICROSCOPE would have seen it.

gem

Gravitoelectromagnetism: linearised general relativity written like Maxwell’s equations. A spinning mass has a gravitomagnetic dipole field, exactly as a spinning charge has a magnetic one, and it drags gyroscopes and orbits (Gravity Probe B, LAGEOS and LARES).

hfgw

High-frequency gravitational waves: the Li–Baker detector and generators, and the Pais patents.

modified

Alternatives to Newton and Einstein that make numbers: MOND and the radial acceleration relation, short-range Yukawa forces, Einstein–Cartan torsion and Weber-like gravity.

propulsion

“Propellantless” thrust: asymmetric capacitors (“lifters”), the EmDrive and Mach-effect thrusters, with ion wind, the photon rocket and the balance effects that a measurement must separate from them.

quantum

Tabletop tests of quantum gravity: entanglement through gravity (Bose–Marletto–Vedral) and the radiation predicted by gravitational collapse of the wavefunction (Diósi–Penrose).

spacetime

Warp drives, wormholes, negative energy and Puthoff’s polarizable vacuum: the closed forms behind the DIA “DIRD” papers on spacetime engineering, from the mainstream literature.

strong_field

The Schwinger limit and strong-field QED: the field at which the vacuum breaks down into electron–positron pairs, how close lasers and accelerators get, and the vacuum’s nonlinear optics below it.

superconductors

Gravity and superconductors: Tajmar’s gravitomagnetic London moment, Podkletnov’s shield and impulse generator, and what general relativity predicts for the same set-ups.