earthsci_ast/simulate/errors.rs
1use super::*;
2
3// ============================================================================
4// Errors
5// ============================================================================
6
7// `CompileError` is defined in the non-gated `crate::compile_error` module so
8// the WASM-compiled `faq` / `join` passes can name it; re-exported here
9// to preserve the native `crate::simulate::CompileError` path.
10pub use crate::compile_error::CompileError;
11
12/// Errors raised building an [`crate::problem::EsmProblem`] or running
13/// [`crate::problem::solve`].
14#[derive(Error, Debug)]
15pub enum SimulateError {
16 /// Wraps a CompileError raised by [`crate::problem::esm_problem`]
17 /// before solving even starts.
18 #[error("Compile failed: {0}")]
19 Compile(#[from] CompileError),
20
21 /// diffsol returned a solver-internal error (build failure, step failure,
22 /// etc.).
23 #[error("diffsol error: {details}")]
24 DiffsolError {
25 /// The underlying diffsol error message.
26 details: String,
27 },
28
29 /// The integrator could not satisfy the requested tolerances.
30 #[error("Tolerance not met")]
31 ToleranceNotMet,
32
33 /// [`crate::problem::solve`] was called on a EsmProblem whose document
34 /// declares no differential equations, so there is nothing to integrate.
35 /// Its build-time products are still readable with
36 /// [`crate::problem::observed_field`].
37 #[error("Nothing to integrate: {details}")]
38 NotDynamic {
39 /// Why the EsmProblem carries no integrable right-hand side.
40 details: String,
41 },
42
43 /// [`crate::problem::ProblemOptions::compiler`] named a value that is in
44 /// API_SPEC §5.8's closed vocabulary but that this binding, this build or
45 /// this process cannot provide (esm-spec §9.6.6 `compiler_unavailable`).
46 ///
47 /// Never answered by building with a different compiler: the whole point
48 /// of naming one is that the caller knows which ran. `details` names what
49 /// would have to be loaded or built.
50 #[error(
51 "{code}: compiler '{compiler}' is not available here: {details}",
52 code = crate::diagnostic::codes::COMPILER_UNAVAILABLE
53 )]
54 CompilerUnavailable {
55 /// The vocabulary spelling the caller asked for.
56 compiler: &'static str,
57 /// What would have to be loaded or built to provide it.
58 details: String,
59 },
60
61 /// A range-restricted or operator-restricted right-hand side (API_SPEC
62 /// §5.8: `select`, `halo`, `tile`, `lanes`) was refused. `code` is one of
63 /// `range_halo_insufficient`, `range_global_locality`,
64 /// `range_selection_writes_incomplete` or `range_box_invalid`, and
65 /// `message` names the rule, variable and axis involved.
66 #[error("{code}: {message}")]
67 RangeRestriction {
68 /// The diagnostic code.
69 code: &'static str,
70 /// What was refused, naming the rule, variable and axis.
71 message: String,
72 },
73
74 /// A DATA-FED parameter — one whose `update` is `kind: "data"` (esm-spec
75 /// §5.4, §8.5) — reached a build with NOTHING bound to it: no provider,
76 /// no loaded array, and no caller-supplied `p` value (esm-spec §9.6.6
77 /// `data_source_unbound`, CONFORMANCE_SPEC §5.46).
78 ///
79 /// Raised at CONSTRUCTION, before any right-hand side is built, so the
80 /// answer does not depend on the compiler: this asks whether the
81 /// DOCUMENT's inputs are bound, not what a compiler can lower. A compiler
82 /// that additionally cannot lower a read of the forcing channel reports
83 /// that separately as [`CompileError::CompilerRefusedRule`](crate::CompileError::CompilerRefusedRule).
84 ///
85 /// Refused rather than evaluated at the parameter's `default`, which is
86 /// not a fallback value but a placeholder: a forcing at its default
87 /// integrates to a complete, smooth trajectory reported under the label of
88 /// a quantity the document says is read from a file.
89 #[error(
90 "{code}: parameter '{parameter}' is fed by the data source '{data_source}' (an `update` of kind \"data\"), and nothing bound it: no provider, no loaded array, and no `p` value. Pass a `providers` entry for '{parameter}' to supply the data, or `p` to pin a value. The build will not fall back to the parameter's `default`: a forcing at its default produces a whole trajectory that looks like an answer",
91 code = crate::diagnostic::codes::DATA_SOURCE_UNBOUND
92 )]
93 DataSourceUnbound {
94 /// The flattened parameter nothing bound.
95 parameter: String,
96 /// The `data_sources` key its `update` names. Spelled `data_source`
97 /// rather than `source`, which `thiserror` reserves for an error's
98 /// CAUSE — a `String` cannot be one.
99 data_source: String,
100 },
101
102 /// A build progress observer asked [`crate::problem::esm_problem`] to
103 /// stop (returned [`Flow::Cancel`]).
104 ///
105 /// Distinct from every other variant in that nothing went wrong: it is the
106 /// caller's own decision. It stays an ERROR — unlike a cancelled *solve*,
107 /// which is [`ReturnCode::Terminated`] with a partial trajectory — because a
108 /// half-built EsmProblem is not a usable result.
109 #[error("Cancelled by the caller during the build: {details}")]
110 Cancelled {
111 /// The phase and item the build stopped at.
112 details: String,
113 },
114
115 /// [`crate::problem::remake`] was asked to substitute a binding the
116 /// EsmProblem cannot honour without redoing part of construction.
117 ///
118 /// Raised rather than silently rebuilding or silently ignoring the
119 /// substitution (`esm-libraries-spec.md` §2.5.5): the name and the class
120 /// that makes it un-substitutable are both reported so the caller knows to
121 /// build a fresh EsmProblem instead.
122 #[error("Cannot remake '{name}': {class}")]
123 UnsubstitutableBinding {
124 /// The binding the caller tried to substitute.
125 name: String,
126 /// The class that makes it un-substitutable.
127 class: String,
128 },
129
130 /// The caller supplied a time span whose start or end is not a finite
131 /// number — `NaN`, `+∞` or `−∞`.
132 ///
133 /// A document cannot spell one: the schema's `TimeSpan` bounds are JSON
134 /// numbers, and esm-spec §6.6.4 records that "JSON has no infinite
135 /// literal". So this is a caller-supplied argument of a solve,
136 /// validated alongside the parameter and initial-condition maps of the same
137 /// call.
138 ///
139 /// Refused rather than interpreted. Every ordering test against `NaN` is
140 /// false, so a `NaN` endpoint reads as a run that cannot advance and would
141 /// hand back the initial state as though it were a trajectory; an infinite
142 /// end gives the solver loop a stop time it can never reach.
143 #[error("Invalid time span ({start}, {end}): start and end must both be finite")]
144 InvalidTimeSpan {
145 /// The requested start of the interval.
146 start: f64,
147 /// The requested end of the interval.
148 end: f64,
149 },
150
151 /// The user supplied a parameter name that does not appear in the
152 /// flattened system.
153 #[error("Invalid parameter '{name}'")]
154 InvalidParameter {
155 /// The unknown parameter name.
156 name: String,
157 },
158
159 /// The user supplied a key that two or more of the flattened system's
160 /// parameters carry as a DOTTED SUFFIX — a shared local name (`gain` for
161 /// `Left.gain` and `Right.gain`) or a shared partial qualification
162 /// (`sub.g` for `Left.sub.g` and `Right.sub.g`), esm-spec §6.6.2 rule 4.
163 /// Distinct from [`SimulateError::InvalidParameter`]: the name exists, it
164 /// just does not identify ONE parameter, and binding it to either
165 /// candidate would be a wrong answer rather than a missing one.
166 #[error(
167 "Ambiguous parameter '{name}': carried as a suffix by {candidates:?} — qualify it further with its owning component"
168 )]
169 AmbiguousParameter {
170 /// The ambiguous local or partially qualified name.
171 name: String,
172 /// The qualified parameters that carry it.
173 candidates: Vec<String>,
174 },
175
176 /// Two or more NON-EXACT `parameter_overrides` keys designate the one
177 /// flattened parameter (esm-spec §6.6.2): a bare local spelling and a
178 /// more-qualified one (`solo` and `Doc.Left.solo` both landing on
179 /// `Left.solo`), or two more-qualified ones (`A.M.g` and `B.M.g` both
180 /// landing on `M.g`). The caller wrote two overrides and only one can take
181 /// effect, so picking a winner would be a wrong answer rather than a
182 /// missing one. An EXACT key is never part of a collision — it identifies
183 /// its parameter outright and wins over any suffix or bare claim on it.
184 #[error(
185 "parameter_overrides: {} keys designate the parameter '{name}' ({}). Supply exactly one override key per name (esm-spec §6.6.2).",
186 .keys.len(), .keys.join(", ")
187 )]
188 CollidingParameterKeys {
189 /// The flattened parameter every colliding key designates.
190 name: String,
191 /// The colliding keys, sorted.
192 keys: Vec<String>,
193 },
194
195 /// The user supplied an initial condition for a name that is not a state
196 /// variable, or a state variable has no initial value (no entry in
197 /// `initial_conditions` and no `default` on the `ModelVariable`).
198 #[error("Invalid initial condition '{name}'")]
199 InvalidInitialCondition {
200 /// The variable name.
201 name: String,
202 },
203
204 /// The user supplied a key that two or more of the flattened system's
205 /// states carry as a DOTTED SUFFIX (esm-spec §6.6.2 rule 4). The
206 /// state-side counterpart of [`SimulateError::AmbiguousParameter`].
207 #[error(
208 "Ambiguous initial condition '{name}': carried as a suffix by {candidates:?} — qualify it further with its owning component"
209 )]
210 AmbiguousInitialCondition {
211 /// The ambiguous local or partially qualified name.
212 name: String,
213 /// The qualified states that carry it.
214 candidates: Vec<String>,
215 },
216
217 /// Two or more NON-EXACT `initial_conditions` keys designate the one state
218 /// element (esm-spec §6.6.2). The state-side counterpart of
219 /// [`SimulateError::CollidingParameterKeys`].
220 #[error(
221 "initial_conditions: {} keys designate the state '{name}' ({}). Supply exactly one override key per name (esm-spec §6.6.2).",
222 .keys.len(), .keys.join(", ")
223 )]
224 CollidingInitialConditionKeys {
225 /// The state element every colliding key designates.
226 name: String,
227 /// The colliding keys, sorted.
228 keys: Vec<String>,
229 },
230
231 /// An `ic(target)` field initial condition could not be resolved to a
232 /// per-cell value. Carries the `ic(...)` target state name plus a
233 /// diagnostic saying why (wrong field rank, unresolvable RHS, ...), so
234 /// the name field stays a plain identifier.
235 #[error("Invalid field initial condition for '{name}': {details}")]
236 InvalidFieldInitialCondition {
237 /// The `ic(...)` target state name.
238 name: String,
239 /// Why the initial condition could not be resolved.
240 details: String,
241 },
242
243 /// A data provider bound in [`crate::problem::ProblemOptions`] failed to
244 /// materialize its loader field, or produced the wrong number of fields for
245 /// its target forcing variable.
246 #[error("Provider for '{name}': {details}")]
247 ProviderError {
248 /// The forcing variable the provider was bound to.
249 name: String,
250 /// What went wrong.
251 details: String,
252 },
253}
254
255impl SimulateError {
256 /// Whether this is a build progress observer's own [`Flow::Cancel`] rather
257 /// than something going wrong — the counterpart of reading
258 /// [`ReturnCode::Terminated`] off a [`Solution`].
259 pub fn is_cancelled(&self) -> bool {
260 matches!(self, SimulateError::Cancelled { .. })
261 }
262}