## Rutie
[](https://travis-ci.org/danielpclark/rutie)
[](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie/commits/master)
[](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie/graphs/contributors)
[](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie/blob/master/LICENSE)
[](https://crates.io/crates/rutie)
`Rutie — /ro͞oˈˌtī/rOOˈˌtI/rüˈˌtaI/`
Integrate Ruby with your Rust application. Or integrate Rust with your Ruby application.
This project allows you to do either with relative ease.
You are highly encouraged to read the source code for this project. Every method that has been
mapped from Ruby for public use in `src/class/*` is **very well documented** with example code.
This is the best way to take off running with Rutie. There are also integration examples in the
examples directory which are based off of this README.
This project is a continuation of:
* [ruru](https://github.com/d-unseductable/ruru/) (licensed MIT)
* [ruby-sys](https://github.com/steveklabnik/ruby-sys/) (licensed MIT)
## Index
* [Using Ruby in Rust](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#using-ruby-in-rust)
* [Using Rust in Ruby](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#using-rust-in-ruby)
* [Custom Ruby Objects in Rust](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#custom-ruby-objects-in-rust)
* [Variadic Functions / Splat Operator](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#variadic-functions--splat-operator)
* [Migrating from Ruru to Rutie](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#migrating-from-ruru-to-rutie)
* [Safety — The Rutie Philosophy vs The Rust Philosophy on Safety](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie/blob/master/README.md#safety--the-rutie-philosophy-vs-the-rust-philosophy-on-safety)
* [Troubleshooting](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#troubleshooting)
* [It panics for some Rubies on CI server tests](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#it-panics-for-some-rubies-on-ci-server-tests)
* [Rust signal: 11, SIGSEGV: invalid memory reference](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#rust-signal-11-sigsegv-invalid-memory-reference)
* [Error while loading shared libraries: libruby.so.#.#: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#error-while-loading-shared-libraries-librubyso-cannot-open-shared-object-file-no-such-file-or-directory)
* [Calling methods from other methods within the `methods!` macro doesn't work](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#calling-methods-from-other-methods-within-the-methods-macro-doesnt-work)
* [Handling exceptions raised from Ruby in Rust code](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#handling-exceptions-raised-from-ruby-in-rust-code)
* [Segfault during GC when using a Ruby method written in C](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie/blob/master/README.md#segfault-during-gc-when-using-a-ruby-method-written-in-c)
* [Operating System Requirements](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#operating-system-requirements)
* [Contributing](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#contributing)
* [Additional Project History](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#additional-project-history)
* [LICENSE](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#license)
## Using Ruby in Rust
First add the dependency to your `Cargo.toml` file.
```toml
[dependencies]
rutie = "0.5.4"
```
Then in your Rust program add `VM::init()` to the beginning of its code execution path
and begin to use Rutie.
```rust
extern crate rutie;
use rutie::{Object, RString, VM};
fn try_it(s: &str) -> String {
let a = RString::new_utf8(s);
// The `send` method returns an AnyObject type.
let b = a.send("reverse", &[]);
// We must try to convert the AnyObject
// type back to our usable type.
match b.try_convert_to::<RString>() {
Ok(ruby_string) => ruby_string.to_string(),
Err(_) => "Fail!".to_string(),
}
}
#[test]
fn it_works() {
// Rust projects must start the Ruby VM
VM::init();
assert_eq!("selppa", try_it("apples"));
}
fn main() {}
```
Running `cargo test` should have this test pass.
## Using Rust in Ruby
You can start a Ruby project with `bundle gem rutie_ruby_example` and then once
you change into that directory run `cargo init`. Remove the TODOs from the gemspec
file. Add Rutie to the `Cargo.toml` file and define the lib type.
```toml
[dependencies]
rutie = "0.5.4"
[lib]
name = "rutie_ruby_example"
crate-type = ["dylib"]
```
Then edit your `src/lib.rs` file for your Rutie code.
```rust
#[macro_use]
extern crate rutie;
use rutie::{Class, Object, RString, VM};
class!(RutieExample);
methods!(
RutieExample,
_itself,
fn pub_reverse(input: RString) -> RString {
let ruby_string = input.
map_err(|e| VM::raise_ex(e) ).
unwrap();
RString::new_utf8(
&ruby_string.
to_string().
chars().
rev().
collect::<String>()
)
}
);
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
#[no_mangle]
pub extern "C" fn Init_rutie_ruby_example() {
Class::new("RutieExample", None).define(|itself| {
itself.def_self("reverse", pub_reverse);
});
}
```
And that's it for the Rust side. When using the `methods!` macro or `extern` functions
make sure the method name won't clash with any others. This is why this example is prefixed with `pub_`.
Now you just need to load the library in Ruby. Add the `rutie` gem to your gemspec or Gemfile.
```ruby
# gemspec
spec.add_dependency 'rutie', '~> 0.0.3'
# Gemfile
gem 'rutie', '~> 0.0.3'
```
And then load the library in your main project file `lib/rutie_ruby_example.rb`.
```ruby
require 'rutie_ruby_example/version'
require 'rutie'
module RutieRubyExample
Rutie.new(:rutie_ruby_example).init 'Init_rutie_ruby_example', __dir__
end
```
That's all you need to load your Ruby things from Rust. Now to write the test in
`test/rutie_ruby_example_test.rb`:
```ruby
require "test_helper"
class RutieRubyExampleTest < Minitest::Test
def test_it_reverses
assert_equal "selppa", RutieExample.reverse("apples")
end
end
```
And to properly test it you will always need to run `cargo build --release` whenever
you make **any** changes to the Rust code. Run the test with:
```bash
cargo build --release; rake test
```
Or better yet change your `Rakefile` to always run the `cargo build --release` before
every test suite run. Feel free to change the test input to prove it fails because
the above test works as is.
## Custom Ruby Objects in Rust
To create a Ruby object in Rust that can be returned directly to Ruby
it needs just a few simple things.
Here's an example excerpt of code from [FasterPath](https://github.com/danielpclark/faster_path).
```rust
use rutie::types::{ Value, ValueType };
use rutie::{ RString, AnyObject, Object, Class, VerifiedObject };
pub struct Pathname {
value: Value
}
impl Pathname {
pub fn new(path: &str) -> Pathname {
let arguments = [RString::new_utf8(path).to_any_object()];
let instance = Class::from_existing("Pathname").new_instance(Some(&arguments));
Pathname { value: instance.value() }
}
pub fn to_any_object(&self) -> AnyObject {
AnyObject::from(self.value())
}
}
impl From<Value> for Pathname {
fn from(value: Value) -> Self {
Pathname { value }
}
}
impl Object for Pathname {
#[inline]
fn value(&self) -> Value {
self.value
}
}
impl VerifiedObject for Pathname {
fn is_correct_type<T: Object>(object: &T) -> bool {
Class::from_existing("Pathname").case_equals(object)
}
fn error_message() -> &'static str {
"Error converting to Pathname"
}
}
```
If the class does not yet exist in Ruby you'll need to account for creating
it before generating a new instance of it. This object is now compatible to
be returned into Ruby directly from Rust/Rutie. _Note that this definition is
merely a Rust compatible representation of the Ruby object and doesn't define
any Ruby methods which can be used from Ruby._
## Variadic Functions / Splat Operator
A preferred way to integrate a dynamic amount of parameters has not yet been implemented in Rutie,
but you can still manage to get it done in the following way.
```rust
use rutie::{AnyObject, Array};
use rutie::types::{Argc, Value};
use rutie::util::str_to_cstring;
use rutie::rubysys::class;
use std::mem;
pub extern fn example_method(argc: Argc, argv: *const AnyObject, _: AnyObject) -> AnyObject {
let args = Value::from(0);
unsafe {
let p_argv: *const Value = mem::transmute(argv);
class::rb_scan_args(
argc,
p_argv,
str_to_cstring("*").as_ptr(),
&args
)
};
let arguments = Array::from(args);
let output = // YOUR CODE HERE. Use arguments as you see fit.
output.to_any_object()
}
```
This style of code is meant to be used outside of the `methods!` macro for now.
You may place this method on a class or module as you normally would from a `methods!` macro definition.
```rust
#[macro_use]
extern crate rutie;
use rutie::{Class, Object, VM};
class!(Example);
// Code from above
fn main() {
# VM::init();
Class::new("Example", None).define(|itself| {
itself.def("example_method", example_method);
});
}
```
The Rutie project has in its plans to remove the need for anyone to write unsafe code for
variadic support and will likely be updating the `methods!` macro to support this natively.
## Migrating from Ruru to Rutie
#### <0.1
For using Rutie versions less than 0.1 the change is simple. Replace all occurrences
of the string `ruru` with `rutie` in your program. And if you would like to use
`ruby-sys` code from Rutie rather than requiring `ruby-sys` you can change all existing
references to `ruby_sys` to `rutie::rubysys`.
#### 0.1
You will have additional considerations to change like `Error` being removed. For that; change instances of type `ruru::result::Error` to `rutie::AnyException`.
#### 0.2
Migrated `parse_arguments` from `VM` to `util`.
#### 0.3
Internal changes `util` from `binding` and `rubysys` have been replaced to reduce confusion and reduce duplication.
## Safety — The Rutie Philosophy vs The Rust Philosophy on Safety
I'm writing this section to bring to light that, as of this writing, the safety that Rust likes to guarantee for its crates and the Rutie crate aren't currently aligned. The typical Rust safety for libraries wrapping C code is to have one unsafe crate with a `-sys` extension in its name and then a crate that wraps that to make it safe.
Rutie is an official fork of the project Ruru and because of this a great deal of the decisions in design for the project remain unchanged. Rutie also brought in the `ruby-sys` crate and treats it as an internal private API/module; and yet shares it openly for other developers to have full control to design their own API on top of it.
One of the glaring things that Rutie has that goes against the Rust Philosophy on Safety is that any of the methods that call Ruby code, can potentially raise an exception, and don't return the type `Option<AnyObject, AnyException>` will panic when an exception is raised from Ruby… which kills the application process running. The way to avoid panics is simple: either guarantee the Ruby code you're running will never raise an exception, or [Handling exceptions raised from Ruby in Rust code](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie#handling-exceptions-raised-from-ruby-in-rust-code) with "protect" methods that return the type `Option<AnyObject, AnyException>`. Anyone can implement this safety by reading and understanding how the **protect** methods are written in this library and working with them.
The important thing to consider as to **“why doesn't every method guarantee the safety as Rust would prescribe to?”** is that exception handling in Ruby is **not a zero cost abstraction**. So there is a cost in performance when you need to implement it. One can easily argue that the guarantee of safety is far more important than leaving the risk in the hands of inexperienced developers. But one could also argue that it is better to leave the choice of performance cost, and the fact that exception capturing is occasionally unnecessary, up to the developer. Seeing how the legacy of design decisions is largely inherited this project leans towards the latter argument where the choice of being absolutely safe everywhere vs some extra speed in performance is up to the developer.
I'm not opposed to this project being 100% safe, but that will be a major change and a totally different API with many decisions that need to come into play. Also since this project doesn't strictly adhere to Rust safety principles, as a crate library would be expected to be, this project will not reach the stable 1.0 release as the idea of stability and safety are hand in hand.
I do like safety guarantees and as much as possible new features and language APIs will be built toward this. You can see what the design of a safe API would look like by examing the [Enumerator features](https://github.com/danielpclark/rutie/blob/master/src/class/enumerator.rs) that have been implemented in this way (largely wrapping method names with calls to `protect_send`).
## Troubleshooting
#### It panics for some Rubies on CI server tests
Sometimes the Ruby binary built isn't the best for the system. Be sure to compile Ruby
for that system if this is the issue. With RVM do `rvm reinstall --disable-binary` with
your choice of Ruby version.
#### Rust signal: 11, SIGSEGV: invalid memory reference
This is an indication that you haven't started a Ruby VM in Rust yet with `VM::init();`. Do this once
before using Ruby code from Rust.
#### Error while loading shared libraries: libruby.so.#.#: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
This may happen when a Ruby program is trying to link with libruby via Rutie. Simply disable linking
by setting the environment variable `NO_LINK_RUTIE` before the Rust code is compiled. This is needed
to be done on the service TravisCI for example.
#### Calling methods from other methods within the `methods!` macro doesn't work
The way the macro is designed doesn't use the same parameter signatures you've provided and
therefore it is recommended to implement any methods you want to re-use in Rust with
functions outside of the `methods!` macro. You can simply call that new external
method in the `methods!` macro when defining methods for Ruby to use.
#### Handling exceptions raised from Ruby in Rust code
If you're using any method that doesn't return a `Result<AnyObject, AnyException>` then
any exception raised from the Ruby side will interfere with that Ruby thread and cause
Rust to panic and stop. Ruby internally uses exceptions to effect the entire thread through
an internal thread global value. To handle places where Ruby may raise an exception during Rust
code execution you should use methods that are designed to handle that.
* `VM::eval`
* `Object.protect_send`
* `Object.protect_public_send`
If you are writing lower level code and want to work more directly with the internal Ruby
exception you may use `VM::protect` and read the source code for `Object.protect_send` to
see how it's done.
#### Segfault during GC when using a Ruby method written in C
One possible issue that may cause this is when you store an item in Rust in heap memory rather than the stack.
An example case that caused this issue is the following:
```rust
Class::from_existing("Pathname").new_instance(Some(&vec![RString::new_utf8(path).to_any_object()]))
```
> Ruby's GC traces objects from the stack. Rust's Vec, on the other hand, stores elements in the heap. So Ruby's GC may not be able to find the string you created and may release it. — @irxground
To rememdy the issue it required not using Vec but rather Rust's array type to store the argument on the stack rather than the heap.
```rust
let arguments = [RString::new_utf8(path).to_any_object()];
Class::from_existing("Pathname").new_instance(Some(&arguments))
```
## Operating System Requirements
Everything is tested against 64 bit operating systems with 64 bit Ruby & Rust builds. 32 bit isn't currently supported.
#### Linux & Mac
- Rust 1.26 or later
- Ruby (64 bit) 2.4 or later
#### Windows
- Rust 1.26 or later
- Ruby 2.5+ built with MingW (64 bit)
- MS Visual Studio (Build Tools)
#### Dynamic vs Static Builds
Ruby needs to be compiled with the `--enable shared` option. Dynamic linking to the Ruby library provides the best performance and best support. Static build support is incomplete for now.
If using RBENV then the following is recommended:
CONFIGURE_OPTS=--enable-shared rbenv install 2.5.3
You can check if your Ruby is compiled to be dynamically linked to by running the following and getting a `"yes"` response.
ruby -e "pp RbConfig::CONFIG['ENABLE_SHARED']"
If you'd like to make a pull request for adding static build support there are currently 3 methods not working with it and linking to the proper name of the ruby static lib file & path needs to be updated.
## Contributing
Contributors are welcome!
The code is organized in 3 main layers. The `rubysys` folder is the raw mapping to Ruby C code and
all the methods from there are unsafe. The `binding` folder is where we wrap those methods to abstract
away all the unsafe methods to safe methods. The `class` folder is where the public API is implemented
for using Ruby with Rust code. These methods in the `class` folder must all be documented and tested within
the documentation. There is a subfolder under `class` for traits called `traits`.
Macros for abstracting away complexity are in `src/dsl.rs`.
Ruby's helper gem is in the submodule folder `gem`.
## Additional Project History
If you need some more examples of usage or the git blame history please look at the [Ruru](https://github.com/d-unseductable/ruru)
project as Rutie has had the README completely rewritten and this first git commit is from Ruru.
Note that there are some fundamental changes which that README won't account for.
This project also had [ruby-sys](https://github.com/steveklabnik/ruby-sys) merged in which may have some additional beneficial git history.
## LICENSE
Both projects that were merged into this project contained identifiers under the MIT license.
This project follows with the same licensing. **ruby-sys** marked MIT as the license in the
`Cargo.toml` file whereas **ruru** had that and included a LICENSE file. This projects LICENSE
has credited the original author by preserving the MIT license author line and appending new
author(s) which is permitted by the MIT LICENSE.
MIT LICENSE — see [LICENSE](LICENSE)