1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
/* -*- Mode: js; js-indent-level: 2; -*- */
/*
* Copyright 2011 Mozilla Foundation and contributors
* Licensed under the New BSD license. See LICENSE or:
* http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
*/
// It turns out that some (most?) JavaScript engines don't self-host
// `Array.prototype.sort`. This makes sense because C++ will likely remain
// faster than JS when doing raw CPU-intensive sorting. However, when using a
// custom comparator function, calling back and forth between the VM's C++ and
// JIT'd JS is rather slow *and* loses JIT type information, resulting in
// worse generated code for the comparator function than would be optimal. In
// fact, when sorting with a comparator, these costs outweigh the benefits of
// sorting in C++. By using our own JS-implemented Quick Sort (below), we get
// a ~3500ms mean speed-up in `bench/bench.html`.
/**
* Swap the elements indexed by `x` and `y` in the array `ary`.
*
* @param {Array} ary
* The array.
* @param {Number} x
* The index of the first item.
* @param {Number} y
* The index of the second item.
*/
/**
* Returns a random integer within the range `low .. high` inclusive.
*
* @param {Number} low
* The lower bound on the range.
* @param {Number} high
* The upper bound on the range.
*/
/**
* The Quick Sort algorithm.
*
* @param {Array} ary
* An array to sort.
* @param {function} comparator
* Function to use to compare two items.
* @param {Number} p
* Start index of the array
* @param {Number} r
* End index of the array
*/
/**
* Sort the given array in-place with the given comparator function.
*
* @param {Array} ary
* An array to sort.
* @param {function} comparator
* Function to use to compare two items.
*/
exports ;