rust-covfix 0.1.0

Fix coverage data generated by kcov
Documentation

rust-covfix

Build Status Build status codecov Version docs GitHub Release Date License: MIT PRs Welcome

Rustc is known to report an incorrect coverage for some lines (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32521800/why-does-kcov-calculate-incorrect-code-coverage-statistics-for-rust-programs). rust-covfix will read coverage from the file generated by grcov), fix it, then outputs the correct coverage.

Though only lcov format is supprted at current, Another formats is going to be supported in future releases.

Features

  • Compatible with latest stable/beta/nightly Rust compiler
  • Windows/OSX/Linux are all supprted
  • Lightweight (small dependencies)
  • Fast and safe (implemented in Rust language)
  • rust-covfix is also available with Rust API (Documentation)

Optional features

Optional features are available with cargo's --features option. You can specify the features like:

$ cargo install --no-default-features --features "cli lcov"
Feature name Description Default?
cli Command Line Interface. This feature is required to build rust-covfix executable. yes
noinline Avoid adding #cfg[inline] attribute on function. no
lcov Make LcovParser available yes
backtrace Dump backtrace information on every time the error has occured. yes

Install

Download the latest release from GitHub Release Page.

You can also install via cargo command.

$ cargo install rust-covfix

How is the incorrect line coverage detected

rust_covfix fixes the coverage information using some rules. You can pass --rules option to specify which rules are used to fix coverages.

Rules

close

closing brackets, line of else block will be ignored.

if a > 0 {
    b = a
} else {  // <-- marked as "not executable"
    b = -a
};  // <-- marked as "not executable"

test

module block named test or tests which has attribute cfg(test) will be ignored

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {  // <-- removed from coverage
    fn util() { ... }  // <-- removed from coverage

    #[test]
    fn test_hoge() { ... }  // <-- removed from coverage
}

loop

Fix rust internal bugs that loop branches are not correctly passed.

for i in 0..10 {  // <-- fix branch coverage information
    println!("{}", i);
}

derive

structs with derive(...) attribute will be ignored

#[derive(Clone, Debug)]  // <-- removed from coverage
struct Point {  // <-- removed from coverage
  x: f64,  // <-- removed from coverage
  y: f64  // <-- removed from coverage
}  // <-- removed from coverage

Roadmap

  • Support cobertura.xml file. (WIP)
  • Add option for uploading the correct coverages to coveralls.
  • Show summary of coverage difference.

Author

👤 Kogia-sima

🤝 Contributing

Contributions, issues and feature requests are welcome!

Feel free to check issues page.

Show your support

Give a ⭐️ if this project helped you!

📝 License

Copyright © 2019 Kogia-sima.

This project is MIT licensed.


This README was generated with ❤️ by readme-md-generator