oorandom 9.3.2

A tiny, robust PRNG implementation.
Documentation

oorandom

Crates.io Docs

A minimalistic pseudorandom number generator in Rust. For those times when the rand crate is just too good and you want something a bit dumber.

More specifically, it implements ONE prng, which is probably a permuted congruential generator (PCG) but may change without warning if something better comes along. It will give you u32 or u64, or floating-point equivalents. Anything else is gravy.

Basically the same as https://github.com/Lokathor/randomize. Except MINE, not HIS! HAH! Actually, a lot of the code came from randomize and I wouldn't have done this if I didn't know of that library. So if there are any bugs, I copied them from randomize.

A brief history of non-cryptographic pseudorandom numbers

The usefulness of random numbers has been known for a long, long time to people who also knew how to use slide rules. If you wanted to do some math without the bother of coming up with all that pesky input data from the real world, you might as well just use any ol' number, as long as it didn't heck up your math too bad. So in the first half of the 20th century you had little old ladies named Edith spinning roulette wheels or pulling bingo balls out of baskets and writing the results down, which got assembled into giant tomes and published so that engineering schools could buy them and have giant tomes sitting on their shelves. Anyone who wanted some meaningless numbers could pull the tome down, flip it open to a presumably-random page, and there were all the random numbers anyone could want. Life was good.

In late 1940's computers were invented, but they were far too big and expensive to be put on the task of intentionally generating nonsense, and things carried on as before. If you needed random numbers in a computer program, you just got a pretty young lady named Marie to transcribe part of the book to punch cards for you.

Around the early 60's computers got fast enough that Edith and Marie couldn't keep up with them, so they got downsized and replaced with more computers. To do this people came up with Linear Congruential Generators (LCG's), which could generate lots of numbers numbers that weren't really random, but sure looked random. LCG's worked on computers that even a second-rate university could afford, and so the problem was solved.

At some unknown point in here, presumably sometime in the 60's or 70's, someone seems to have invented Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSR's) as well. These made random-looking numbers and were really easy to implement in hardware instead the LCG, which needed complicated things like binary multipliers. The random-looking numbers made by LFSR's were good enough for hardware people, so they started using LFSR's whenever they needed to and never looked back.

Anyway, by the late 60's people who knew how to use slide rules had realized that using numbers that only looked random could really heck up their math pretty bad, and one of the more common LCG implmentations, RANDU, was actually about as bad as possible. So, just using any old LCG wasn't good enough, you had to use one made by someone with a PhD in mathematics. Donald Knuth shook his fist at the world and shouted "Hah! I told you so!", published a book on how to do it Right that most people didn't read, and then went back into his Fortress of Solitude to write TeX. Because it was crated by IBM, RANDU's awfulness is now enshrined forever in history documents like this one, and because the people writing OS's and programming languages at the time weren't doing much slide-rule stuff and didn't actually need a lot of good random-looking numbers, everyone went back to using whatever old crap RNG they were using anyway.

Also, sometime in the 70's or 80's the arts of cryptography started leaking from classified government works into the real world. People started thinking about how much money they could make from scrambling satellite TV so that plebs with HAM radio licenses couldn't watch it, and these people started giving more money to people who had PhD's in mathematics. It was quickly determined that neither LCG's nor LFSR's made good enough random-looking numbers to really deter someone who knew how to use a slide rule, and since Edith had long ago retired to a small beach house in New Jersey, they needed to figure out how to get computers to make better random-looking numbers. But making random-looking numbers good enough for cyptography was slow and involved lots of things that nobody else really cared about, so that topic went off on its own adventures and will not be further mentioned.

Things more or less trundled along this way until the late 90's, when suddenly computers were everywhere and there was a new generation of people who had grown up too late to know how to use slide rules, so they did all their math with computers. They were doing a LOT of math by now, and they looked around and realized that their random-looking numbers really weren't very random-looking at all, and this was actually something of a problem by now. So the Mersenne Twister got invented. It was pretty slow and used a lot of memory and made kinda mediocre random numbers, but it was way better than a bad LCG, and most importantly, it had a cool name. Most people didn't want to read Knuth's book and figure out how to make a non-bad LCG, so everyone started using the Mersenne Twister whenever possible.

This is where things stood until the early 2010's, when I finished my MS and started paying attention again. People suddenly realized it was possible to make random-looking numbers better than the Mersenne Twister using an algorithm called xorshift. Xorshift was fast, it made pretty random-looking numbers, and it didn't need a whole 3 kilobytes of state just sitting around taking up space and causing comment among the neighbors at church. It did sometimes have problems with some of its numbers not looking random enough in a few select circumstances, but a couple people with PhD's in mathematics slowly and patiently spent years figuring out ways to work around these problems, leading to a whole confusing family of related things such as xoshiro, xoroshiro, xoroshiro+, xoroshiro*, and so on. Nobody else could really tell the difference between them, but everyone agreed they were better than Mersenne Twister, easier to implement, and the name was nearly as cool. Many papers were published and a good time was had by all.

At least until the late 2010's when some bright young spark figured out that it actually wasn't too hard, if you read Knuth's book and paid attention to what you were doing, to take the old LCG and hop it up on cocaine and moon juice. The result got called the Permuted Congruential Generator, or PCG. This quite miffed the people working on xorshift generators by being almost as small and fast, using xor's and bit shifts (that's xorshift's turf, dammit, it's right in the name!), and producing random-looking numbers that satisfied even the people who had learned to use slide rules for fun in this latter age. Since nobody had figured out any downsides to PCG's yet, everyone shrugged and said "might as well just go with that then", and that is where, as of 2019, the art currently stands.