/// Defines the HTTP configuration for an API service. It contains a list of
/// [HttpRule][google.api.HttpRule], each specifying the mapping of an RPC method
/// to one or more HTTP REST API methods.
/// # gRPC Transcoding
///
/// gRPC Transcoding is a feature for mapping between a gRPC method and one or
/// more HTTP REST endpoints. It allows developers to build a single API service
/// that supports both gRPC APIs and REST APIs. Many systems, including [Google
/// APIs](https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis),
/// [Cloud Endpoints](https://cloud.google.com/endpoints), [gRPC
/// Gateway](https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway),
/// and [Envoy](https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy) proxy support this feature
/// and use it for large scale production services.
///
/// `HttpRule` defines the schema of the gRPC/REST mapping. The mapping specifies
/// how different portions of the gRPC request message are mapped to the URL
/// path, URL query parameters, and HTTP request body. It also controls how the
/// gRPC response message is mapped to the HTTP response body. `HttpRule` is
/// typically specified as an `google.api.http` annotation on the gRPC method.
///
/// Each mapping specifies a URL path template and an HTTP method. The path
/// template may refer to one or more fields in the gRPC request message, as long
/// as each field is a non-repeated field with a primitive (non-message) type.
/// The path template controls how fields of the request message are mapped to
/// the URL path.
///
/// Example:
///
/// service Messaging {
/// rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
/// option (google.api.http) = {
/// get: "/v1/{name=messages/*}"
/// };
/// }
/// }
/// message GetMessageRequest {
/// string name = 1; // Mapped to URL path.
/// }
/// message Message {
/// string text = 1; // The resource content.
/// }
///
/// This enables an HTTP REST to gRPC mapping as below:
///
/// HTTP | gRPC
/// -----|-----
/// `GET /v1/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(name: "messages/123456")`
///
/// Any fields in the request message which are not bound by the path template
/// automatically become HTTP query parameters if there is no HTTP request body.
/// For example:
///
/// service Messaging {
/// rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
/// option (google.api.http) = {
/// get:"/v1/messages/{message_id}"
/// };
/// }
/// }
/// message GetMessageRequest {
/// message SubMessage {
/// string subfield = 1;
/// }
/// string message_id = 1; // Mapped to URL path.
/// int64 revision = 2; // Mapped to URL query parameter `revision`.
/// SubMessage sub = 3; // Mapped to URL query parameter `sub.subfield`.
/// }
///
/// This enables a HTTP JSON to RPC mapping as below:
///
/// HTTP | gRPC
/// -----|-----
/// `GET /v1/messages/123456?revision=2&sub.subfield=foo` |
/// `GetMessage(message_id: "123456" revision: 2 sub: SubMessage(subfield:
/// "foo"))`
///
/// Note that fields which are mapped to URL query parameters must have a
/// primitive type or a repeated primitive type or a non-repeated message type.
/// In the case of a repeated type, the parameter can be repeated in the URL
/// as `...?param=A¶m=B`. In the case of a message type, each field of the
/// message is mapped to a separate parameter, such as
/// `...?foo.a=A&foo.b=B&foo.c=C`.
///
/// For HTTP methods that allow a request body, the `body` field
/// specifies the mapping. Consider a REST update method on the
/// message resource collection:
///
/// service Messaging {
/// rpc UpdateMessage(UpdateMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
/// option (google.api.http) = {
/// patch: "/v1/messages/{message_id}"
/// body: "message"
/// };
/// }
/// }
/// message UpdateMessageRequest {
/// string message_id = 1; // mapped to the URL
/// Message message = 2; // mapped to the body
/// }
///
/// The following HTTP JSON to RPC mapping is enabled, where the
/// representation of the JSON in the request body is determined by
/// protos JSON encoding:
///
/// HTTP | gRPC
/// -----|-----
/// `PATCH /v1/messages/123456 { "text": "Hi!" }` | `UpdateMessage(message_id:
/// "123456" message { text: "Hi!" })`
///
/// The special name `*` can be used in the body mapping to define that
/// every field not bound by the path template should be mapped to the
/// request body. This enables the following alternative definition of
/// the update method:
///
/// service Messaging {
/// rpc UpdateMessage(Message) returns (Message) {
/// option (google.api.http) = {
/// patch: "/v1/messages/{message_id}"
/// body: "*"
/// };
/// }
/// }
/// message Message {
/// string message_id = 1;
/// string text = 2;
/// }
///
///
/// The following HTTP JSON to RPC mapping is enabled:
///
/// HTTP | gRPC
/// -----|-----
/// `PATCH /v1/messages/123456 { "text": "Hi!" }` | `UpdateMessage(message_id:
/// "123456" text: "Hi!")`
///
/// Note that when using `*` in the body mapping, it is not possible to
/// have HTTP parameters, as all fields not bound by the path end in
/// the body. This makes this option more rarely used in practice when
/// defining REST APIs. The common usage of `*` is in custom methods
/// which don't use the URL at all for transferring data.
///
/// It is possible to define multiple HTTP methods for one RPC by using
/// the `additional_bindings` option. Example:
///
/// service Messaging {
/// rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
/// option (google.api.http) = {
/// get: "/v1/messages/{message_id}"
/// additional_bindings {
/// get: "/v1/users/{user_id}/messages/{message_id}"
/// }
/// };
/// }
/// }
/// message GetMessageRequest {
/// string message_id = 1;
/// string user_id = 2;
/// }
///
/// This enables the following two alternative HTTP JSON to RPC mappings:
///
/// HTTP | gRPC
/// -----|-----
/// `GET /v1/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(message_id: "123456")`
/// `GET /v1/users/me/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(user_id: "me" message_id:
/// "123456")`
///
/// ## Rules for HTTP mapping
///
/// 1. Leaf request fields (recursive expansion nested messages in the request
/// message) are classified into three categories:
/// - Fields referred by the path template. They are passed via the URL path.
/// - Fields referred by the [HttpRule.body][google.api.HttpRule.body]. They are passed via the HTTP
/// request body.
/// - All other fields are passed via the URL query parameters, and the
/// parameter name is the field path in the request message. A repeated
/// field can be represented as multiple query parameters under the same
/// name.
/// 2. If [HttpRule.body][google.api.HttpRule.body] is "*", there is no URL query parameter, all fields
/// are passed via URL path and HTTP request body.
/// 3. If [HttpRule.body][google.api.HttpRule.body] is omitted, there is no HTTP request body, all
/// fields are passed via URL path and URL query parameters.
///
/// ### Path template syntax
///
/// Template = "/" Segments [ Verb ] ;
/// Segments = Segment { "/" Segment } ;
/// Segment = "*" | "**" | LITERAL | Variable ;
/// Variable = "{" FieldPath [ "=" Segments ] "}" ;
/// FieldPath = IDENT { "." IDENT } ;
/// Verb = ":" LITERAL ;
///
/// The syntax `*` matches a single URL path segment. The syntax `**` matches
/// zero or more URL path segments, which must be the last part of the URL path
/// except the `Verb`.
///
/// The syntax `Variable` matches part of the URL path as specified by its
/// template. A variable template must not contain other variables. If a variable
/// matches a single path segment, its template may be omitted, e.g. `{var}`
/// is equivalent to `{var=*}`.
///
/// The syntax `LITERAL` matches literal text in the URL path. If the `LITERAL`
/// contains any reserved character, such characters should be percent-encoded
/// before the matching.
///
/// If a variable contains exactly one path segment, such as `"{var}"` or
/// `"{var=*}"`, when such a variable is expanded into a URL path on the client
/// side, all characters except `[-_.~0-9a-zA-Z]` are percent-encoded. The
/// server side does the reverse decoding. Such variables show up in the
/// [Discovery
/// Document](https://developers.google.com/discovery/v1/reference/apis) as
/// `{var}`.
///
/// If a variable contains multiple path segments, such as `"{var=foo/*}"`
/// or `"{var=**}"`, when such a variable is expanded into a URL path on the
/// client side, all characters except `[-_.~/0-9a-zA-Z]` are percent-encoded.
/// The server side does the reverse decoding, except "%2F" and "%2f" are left
/// unchanged. Such variables show up in the
/// [Discovery
/// Document](https://developers.google.com/discovery/v1/reference/apis) as
/// `{+var}`.
///
/// ## Using gRPC API Service Configuration
///
/// gRPC API Service Configuration (service config) is a configuration language
/// for configuring a gRPC service to become a user-facing product. The
/// service config is simply the YAML representation of the `google.api.Service`
/// proto message.
///
/// As an alternative to annotating your proto file, you can configure gRPC
/// transcoding in your service config YAML files. You do this by specifying a
/// `HttpRule` that maps the gRPC method to a REST endpoint, achieving the same
/// effect as the proto annotation. This can be particularly useful if you
/// have a proto that is reused in multiple services. Note that any transcoding
/// specified in the service config will override any matching transcoding
/// configuration in the proto.
///
/// Example:
///
/// http:
/// rules:
/// # Selects a gRPC method and applies HttpRule to it.
/// - selector: example.v1.Messaging.GetMessage
/// get: /v1/messages/{message_id}/{sub.subfield}
///
/// ## Special notes
///
/// When gRPC Transcoding is used to map a gRPC to JSON REST endpoints, the
/// proto to JSON conversion must follow the [proto3
/// specification](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#json).
///
/// While the single segment variable follows the semantics of
/// [RFC 6570](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6570) Section 3.2.2 Simple String
/// Expansion, the multi segment variable **does not** follow RFC 6570 Section
/// 3.2.3 Reserved Expansion. The reason is that the Reserved Expansion
/// does not expand special characters like `?` and `#`, which would lead
/// to invalid URLs. As the result, gRPC Transcoding uses a custom encoding
/// for multi segment variables.
///
/// The path variables **must not** refer to any repeated or mapped field,
/// because client libraries are not capable of handling such variable expansion.
///
/// The path variables **must not** capture the leading "/" character. The reason
/// is that the most common use case "{var}" does not capture the leading "/"
/// character. For consistency, all path variables must share the same behavior.
///
/// Repeated message fields must not be mapped to URL query parameters, because
/// no client library can support such complicated mapping.
///
/// If an API needs to use a JSON array for request or response body, it can map
/// the request or response body to a repeated field. However, some gRPC
/// Transcoding implementations may not support this feature.
/// A custom pattern is used for defining custom HTTP verb.
/// An indicator of the behavior of a given field (for example, that a field
/// is required in requests, or given as output but ignored as input).
/// This **does not** change the behavior in protocol buffers itself; it only
/// denotes the behavior and may affect how API tooling handles the field.
///
/// Note: This enum **may** receive new values in the future.
/// A simple descriptor of a resource type.
///
/// ResourceDescriptor annotates a resource message (either by means of a
/// protobuf annotation or use in the service config), and associates the
/// resource's schema, the resource type, and the pattern of the resource name.
///
/// Example:
///
/// message Topic {
/// // Indicates this message defines a resource schema.
/// // Declares the resource type in the format of {service}/{kind}.
/// // For Kubernetes resources, the format is {api group}/{kind}.
/// option (google.api.resource) = {
/// type: "pubsub.googleapis.com/Topic"
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "projects/{project}/topics/{topic}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project"
/// parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}"
/// }
/// };
/// }
///
/// The ResourceDescriptor Yaml config will look like:
///
/// resources:
/// - type: "pubsub.googleapis.com/Topic"
/// name_descriptor:
/// - pattern: "projects/{project}/topics/{topic}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project"
/// parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}"
///
/// Sometimes, resources have multiple patterns, typically because they can
/// live under multiple parents.
///
/// Example:
///
/// message LogEntry {
/// option (google.api.resource) = {
/// type: "logging.googleapis.com/LogEntry"
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "projects/{project}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project"
/// parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}"
/// }
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "folders/{folder}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder"
/// parent_name_extractor: "folders/{folder}"
/// }
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "organizations/{organization}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Organization"
/// parent_name_extractor: "organizations/{organization}"
/// }
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "billing.googleapis.com/BillingAccount"
/// parent_name_extractor: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}"
/// }
/// };
/// }
///
/// The ResourceDescriptor Yaml config will look like:
///
/// resources:
/// - type: 'logging.googleapis.com/LogEntry'
/// name_descriptor:
/// - pattern: "projects/{project}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project"
/// parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}"
/// - pattern: "folders/{folder}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder"
/// parent_name_extractor: "folders/{folder}"
/// - pattern: "organizations/{organization}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Organization"
/// parent_name_extractor: "organizations/{organization}"
/// - pattern: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}/logs/{log}"
/// parent_type: "billing.googleapis.com/BillingAccount"
/// parent_name_extractor: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}"
///
/// For flexible resources, the resource name doesn't contain parent names, but
/// the resource itself has parents for policy evaluation.
///
/// Example:
///
/// message Shelf {
/// option (google.api.resource) = {
/// type: "library.googleapis.com/Shelf"
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "shelves/{shelf}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project"
/// }
/// name_descriptor: {
/// pattern: "shelves/{shelf}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder"
/// }
/// };
/// }
///
/// The ResourceDescriptor Yaml config will look like:
///
/// resources:
/// - type: 'library.googleapis.com/Shelf'
/// name_descriptor:
/// - pattern: "shelves/{shelf}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project"
/// - pattern: "shelves/{shelf}"
/// parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder"
/// Defines a proto annotation that describes a string field that refers to
/// an API resource.
/// Message that represents an arbitrary HTTP body. It should only be used for
/// payload formats that can't be represented as JSON, such as raw binary or
/// an HTML page.
///
///
/// This message can be used both in streaming and non-streaming API methods in
/// the request as well as the response.
///
/// It can be used as a top-level request field, which is convenient if one
/// wants to extract parameters from either the URL or HTTP template into the
/// request fields and also want access to the raw HTTP body.
///
/// Example:
///
/// message GetResourceRequest {
/// // A unique request id.
/// string request_id = 1;
///
/// // The raw HTTP body is bound to this field.
/// google.api.HttpBody http_body = 2;
/// }
///
/// service ResourceService {
/// rpc GetResource(GetResourceRequest) returns (google.api.HttpBody);
/// rpc UpdateResource(google.api.HttpBody) returns
/// (google.protobuf.Empty);
/// }
///
/// Example with streaming methods:
///
/// service CaldavService {
/// rpc GetCalendar(stream google.api.HttpBody)
/// returns (stream google.api.HttpBody);
/// rpc UpdateCalendar(stream google.api.HttpBody)
/// returns (stream google.api.HttpBody);
/// }
///
/// Use of this type only changes how the request and response bodies are
/// handled, all other features will continue to work unchanged.
/// `Authentication` defines the authentication configuration for an API.
///
/// Example for an API targeted for external use:
///
/// name: calendar.googleapis.com
/// authentication:
/// providers:
/// - id: google_calendar_auth
/// jwks_uri: https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/certs
/// issuer: https://securetoken.google.com
/// rules:
/// - selector: "*"
/// requirements:
/// provider_id: google_calendar_auth
/// Authentication rules for the service.
///
/// By default, if a method has any authentication requirements, every request
/// must include a valid credential matching one of the requirements.
/// It's an error to include more than one kind of credential in a single
/// request.
///
/// If a method doesn't have any auth requirements, request credentials will be
/// ignored.
/// Specifies a location to extract JWT from an API request.
/// Configuration for an authentication provider, including support for
/// [JSON Web Token
/// (JWT)](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-32).
/// OAuth scopes are a way to define data and permissions on data. For example,
/// there are scopes defined for "Read-only access to Google Calendar" and
/// "Access to Cloud Platform". Users can consent to a scope for an application,
/// giving it permission to access that data on their behalf.
///
/// OAuth scope specifications should be fairly coarse grained; a user will need
/// to see and understand the text description of what your scope means.
///
/// In most cases: use one or at most two OAuth scopes for an entire family of
/// products. If your product has multiple APIs, you should probably be sharing
/// the OAuth scope across all of those APIs.
///
/// When you need finer grained OAuth consent screens: talk with your product
/// management about how developers will use them in practice.
///
/// Please note that even though each of the canonical scopes is enough for a
/// request to be accepted and passed to the backend, a request can still fail
/// due to the backend requiring additional scopes or permissions.
/// User-defined authentication requirements, including support for
/// [JSON Web Token
/// (JWT)](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-32).