Ascesis
=======
[](https://crates.io/crates/ascesis)
[](https://docs.rs/ascesis)
A language for analysis and synthesis of [cause-effect
synchronised](https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-20461-7)
interacting systems.
## Syntax
_Ascesis_ syntax is almost fully covered by formal definition. The
primary reference is the [specification in
EBNF](spec/ascesis-syntax.ebnf). Some details concerning lexing are
left to the [implementation notes](spec/lexer-implementation.md).
There are also two, mostly conformant implementation files, which may
serve as a secondary reference — one is used for [sentence
generation](src/ascesis_grammar.bnf) and another for
[parsing](src/ascesis_parser.lalrpop).
## Semantics
For now, see [implementation notes](spec/parser-implementation.md).
## Examples
### Single arrow
The simplest _fat arrow rule_ defines a single-arrow structure. For
example, below is the rule `a => b`, which is the entire contents of
the `Arrow` structure definition. The `Arrow` structure is in turn
instantiated in the body of the `Main` structure definition.
```rust
ces Arrow { a => b }
ces Main { Arrow() }
```
The `Main` structure cannot be instantiated explicitly. Instead, the
instantiation of `Main` is performed when a `.ces` file containing its
definition is being interpreted. All structure identifiers defined in
a file must be unique.
Any fat arrow rule is equivalent to a rule expression consisting of a
sequence of _thin arrow rules_ separated with (infix) addition
operator. The fat-into-thin (_FIT_) transformation steps are sketched
out in [implementation
notes](spec/parser-implementation.md#fat-arrow-rules). The arrow
above is thus equivalent to
```rust
ces Arrow { { a -> b } + { b <- a } }
ces Main { Arrow() }
```
If the addition operator was missing between rule expressions, then
their syntactic concatenation would be interpreted as _multiplication_
of corresponding polynomials. Note, however, that when two thin arrow
rules are used for defining a single-arrow structure, the result of
their multiplication is the same as the result of addition. For
example, next fragment will be interpreted as the same arrow as above
(for brevity, here defined directly in `Main`),
```rust
ces Main { { a -> b } { b <- a } }
```
Indeed, in this case we get `b` • _θ_ for effect
polynomial of node `a`, and _θ_ • `a` for cause
polynomial of node `b`.
### Context
By default, node labels are equal to node identifiers, node capacities
are equal to 1, all node-to-monomial multiplicities are equal to 1,
and there are no inhibitors. Therefore, in all previous examples
these mappings are declared implicitly as
```rust
vis { labels: { a: "a", b: "b" } }
cap { 1 a b }
mul { 1 a -> b, 1 b <- a }
```
What follows is a parameterized definition of a single-arrow
structure, which is instantiated in the context providing explicitly
specified node labels and increased capacity of node `a`.
```rust
ces Arrow(x: Node, y: Node) { x => y }
vis { labels: { a: "Source", z: "Sink" } }
cap { 3 a }
ces Main { Arrow!(a, z) }
```
### Immediate and template definitions
FIXME
### Arrow sequence
A fat arrow rule may consist of two or more polynomials. For example,
a fat arrow rule with four single-node polynomials results in three
arrows,
```rust
ces ThreeArrowsInARow(w: Node, x: Node, y: Node, z: Node) { w => x => y => z }
// seven arrows in a row
ces Main {
ThreeArrowsInARow!(a, b, c, d) + { d => e } + ThreeArrowsInARow!(e, f, g, h)
}
```
There are four kinds of atomic rule expressions (constructs allowed in
the leaves of rule expression AST): a single thin or single fat arrow
rule, an immediate instantiation, or a template instantiation.
### Fork
A fork structure may be defined with a single fat arrow rule,
```rust
ces Main { a => b c }
```
Each of the rule expressions below is an alternative definition of the
same fork as defined above. The final result, their product, is the
same fork as well.
```rust
ces Main {
{ b c <= a }
{ { a => b } { a => c } }
{ { a -> b c } { b c <- a } }
{ { a -> b c } + { b c <- a } }
}
```
### Choice
Like a fork, a choice structure may be defined with a single fat arrow
rule,
```rust
ces Main { a => b + c } // equivalently, b <= a => c
```
Node identifiers occuring in an arrow rule need not be unique. Next
is a valid definition of a three-way choice,
```rust
ces Main { b <= a => c <= a => d } // equivalent to a => b + c + d
```
and another expression, where the choice is between a set of nodes and
its subset:
```rust
ces Main { a => b c + b } // equivalent to { a => b c } + { a => b }
```
## License
The specification of _Ascesis_ language is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 license. This implementation is licensed
under the MIT license. Please read the [LICENSE-CC](LICENSE-CC) and
[LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT) files in this repository for more
information.