1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
//! Biscuit authentication and authorization token
//!
//! Biscuit is an authorization token for microservices architectures with the following properties:
//!
//! * decentralized validation: any node could validate the token only with public information;
//! * offline delegation: a new, valid token can be created from another one by attenuating its rights, by its holder, without communicating with anyone;
//! * capabilities based: authorization in microservices should be tied to rights related to the request, instead of relying to an identity that might not make sense to the verifier;
//! * flexible rights managements: the token uses a logic language to specify attenuation and add bounds on ambient data;
//! * small enough to fit anywhere (cookies, etc).
//!
//! Non goals:
//!
//! * This is not a new authentication protocol. Biscuit tokens can be used as opaque tokens delivered by other systems such as OAuth.
//! * Revocation: while tokens come with expiration dates, revocation requires external state management.
//!
//! # Usage
//!
//! Most of the interaction with this library is done through the
//! [Biscuit](`crate::token::Biscuit`) structure, that represents a valid
//! token, and the [Verifier](`crate::token::verifier::Verifier`), used to
//! check authorization policies on a token.
//!
//! In this example we will see how we can create a token, add some checks,
//! serialize and deserialize a token, append more checks, and validate
//! those checks in the context of a request:
//!
//! ```rust
//! extern crate biscuit_auth as biscuit;
//!
//! use biscuit::{crypto::KeyPair, token::{Biscuit, verifier::Verifier, builder::*}, error};
//!
//! fn main() -> Result<(), error::Token> {
//!   // let's generate the root key pair. The root public key will be necessary
//!   // to verify the token
//!   let root = KeyPair::new();
//!   let public_key = root.public();
//!
//!   // creating a first token
//!   let token1 = {
//!     // the first block of the token is the authority block. It contains global
//!     // information like which operation types are available
//!     let mut builder = Biscuit::builder(&root);
//!
//!     // let's define some access rights
//!     // every fact added to the authority block must have the authority fact
//!     builder.add_authority_fact("right(#authority, \"/a/file1.txt\", #read)")?;
//!     builder.add_authority_fact("right(#authority, \"/a/file1.txt\", #write)")?;
//!     builder.add_authority_fact("right(#authority, \"/a/file2.txt\", #read)")?;
//!     builder.add_authority_fact("right(#authority, \"/b/file3.txt\", #write)")?;
//!
//!     // we can now create the token
//!     let biscuit = builder.build()?;
//!     println!("biscuit (authority): {}", biscuit.print());
//!
//!     biscuit.to_vec()?
//!   };
//!
//!   // this token is only 244 bytes, holding the authority data and the signature
//!   assert_eq!(token1.len(), 244);
//!
//!   // now let's add some restrictions to this token
//!   // we want to limit access to `/a/file1.txt` and to read operations
//!   let token2 = {
//!     // the token is deserialized, the signature is verified
//!     let deser = Biscuit::from(&token1)?;
//!
//!     let mut builder = deser.create_block();
//!
//!     // checks are implemented as logic rules. If the rule produces something,
//!     // the check is successful
//!     builder.add_check(rule(
//!       // the rule's name
//!       "check",
//!       // the "head" of the rule, defining the kind of result that is produced
//!       &[s("resource")],
//!       // here we require the presence of a "resource" fact with the "ambient" tag
//!       // (meaning it is provided by the verifier)
//!       &[
//!         pred("resource", &[s("ambient"), string("/a/file1.txt")]),
//!         // we restrict to read operations
//!         pred("operation", &[s("ambient"), s("read")]),
//!       ],
//!     ));
//!
//!     // the previous check could also be written like this
//!     // builder.add_check("check if resource(#ambient, \"/a/file1.txt\"), operation(#ambient, #read)")?;
//!
//!     let keypair = KeyPair::new();
//!     // we can now create a new token
//!     let biscuit = deser.append(&keypair, builder)?;
//!     println!("biscuit (authority): {}", biscuit.print());
//!
//!     biscuit.to_vec()?
//!   };
//!
//!   // this new token fits in 373 bytes
//!   assert_eq!(token2.len(), 373);
//!
//!   /************** VERIFICATION ****************/
//!
//!   // let's deserialize the token:
//!   let biscuit2 = Biscuit::from(&token2)?;
//!
//!   // let's define 3 verifiers (corresponding to 3 different requests):
//!   // - one for /a/file1.txt and a read operation
//!   // - one for /a/file1.txt and a write operation
//!   // - one for /a/file2.txt and a read operation
//!
//!   let mut v1 = biscuit2.verify(public_key)?;
//!   v1.add_resource("/a/file1.txt");
//!   v1.add_operation("read");
//!   // we will check that the token has the corresponding right
//!   v1.add_check("check if right(#authority, \"/a/file1.txt\", #read)");
//!
//!   // we choose if we want to allow or deny access
//!   // we can define a serie of allow/deny policies in the same
//!   // format as checks
//!   v1.allow();
//!
//!   // the token restricts to read operations:
//!   assert!(v1.verify().is_ok());
//!
//!   let mut v2 = biscuit2.verify(public_key)?;
//!   v2.add_resource("/a/file1.txt");
//!   v2.add_operation("write");
//!   v2.add_check("check if right(#authority, \"/a/file1.txt\", #write)");
//!
//!   // the second verifier requested a read operation
//!   assert!(v2.verify().is_err());
//!
//!   let mut v3 = biscuit2.verify(public_key)?;
//!   v3.add_resource("/a/file2.txt");
//!   v3.add_operation("read");
//!   v3.add_check("check if right(#authority, \"/a/file2.txt\", #read)");
//!
//!   // the third verifier requests /a/file2.txt
//!   assert!(v3.verify().is_err());
//!
//!   Ok(())
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! # Concepts
//!
//! ## blocks
//!
//! A Biscuit token is made with a list of blocks defining data and checks that
//! must be validated upon reception with a request. Any failed check will invalidate
//! the entire token.
//!
//! If you hold a valid token, it is possible to add a new block to restrict further
//! the token, like limiting access to one particular resource, or adding a short
//! expiration date. This will generate a new, valid token. This can be done offline,
//! without asking the original token creator.
//!
//! On the other hand, if a block is modified or removed, the token will fail the
//! cryptographic signature verification.
//!
//! ## Cryptography
//!
//! Biscuit tokens get inspiration from macaroons and JSON Web Tokens, reproducing
//! useful features from both:
//!
//! - offline delegation like macaroons
//! - based on public key cryptography like JWT, so any application holding the root public key can verify a token (while macaroons are based on a root shared secret)
//!
//! ## A logic language for authorization policies: Datalog with constraints
//!
//! We rely on a modified version of Datalog, that can represent complex behaviours
//! in a compact form, and add flexible constraints on data.
//!
//! Here are examples of checks that can be implemented with that language:
//!
//! - valid if the requested resource is "file.txt" and the operation is "read"
//! - valid if current time is before January 1st 2030, 00h00mn00s UTC
//! - source IP is in set [1.2.3.4, 5.6.7.8]
//! - resource matches prefix "/home/biscuit/data/"
//!
//! But it can also combine into more complex patterns, like: right is read *if*
//! user has read *or* user is member of organisation and organisation has read right
//! *or* other user with read right has delegated to user.
//!
//! Like Datalog, this language is based around facts and rules, but with some
//! slight modifications:
//!
//! - an authority fact starts with the `#authority` symbol. It can only be added in the authority block (or generated from rules in the authority rules). It provides the basic authorization data, like which rights exist
//! - an ambient fact starts with the `#ambient` symbol. It can only be provided by the verifier. It gives information on the current request, like which resource is accessed or the current time
//!
//! Blocks can provide facts but they cannot be authority or ambient facts. They
//! contain rules that use facts from the current block, or from the authority
//! and ambient contexts. If all rules in a block succeed, the block is validated.
//!
//! ### Checks
//!
//! A check requires the presence of one or more facts, and can have additional
//! constraints on these facts (the constraints are implemented separately to simplify
//! the language implementation: among other things, it avoids implementing negation).
//! It is possible to create rules like these ones:
//!
//! - `check if resource("file1")`
//! - `check if resource($0), owner("user1", $0)` the $0 represents a "hole" that must be filled with the correct value
//! - `check if time($0), $0 < 2019-02-05T23:00:00Z` expiration date
//! - `check if application($0), operation($1), user($2), right(#app, $0, $1), owner($2, $0), credit($2, $3), $3 > 0` verifies that the user owns the applications, the application has the right on the operation, there's a credit information for the operation, and the credit is larger than 0
//!
//! ### Allow/deny policies
//!
//! On the verification side, we can define *allow/deny policies*, which are tested
//! after all checks passed, one by one in order until one of them matches.
//!
//! * if an *allow* matches, verification succeeds
//! * if a *deny* matches, verification fails
//! * if there's no *allow* or *deny*, verification fails
//!
//! They can be written as follows:
//!
//! ```ignore
//! // verify that we have the right for this request
//! allow if
//!   resource(#ambient, $res),
//!   operation(#ambient, $op),
//!   right(#authority, $res, $op);//!
//!
//! deny if true;
//! ```
//!
//! ## Symbols and symbol tables
//!
//! To reduce the size of tokens, the language supports a data type called "symbol".
//! A symbol is a string that we can refer to with a number, an index in the symbol
//! table that is carried with the token. Symbols can be checked for equality, or
//! presence in a set, but lack the other constraints on strings like prefix or suffix
//! matching.
//!
//! They can be used for pretty printing of a fact or rule. As an example, with a table
//! containing `["resource", "operation", "read", "rule1"]`, we could have the following rule:
//! `#4() <- #0("file.txt"), #1(#2)` that would be printed as `rule1() <- resource("file.txt"), operation(#read)`
//!
//! biscuit implementations come with a default symbol table to avoid transmitting
//! frequent values with every token.
extern crate bytes;
extern crate curve25519_dalek;
extern crate hmac;
extern crate prost;
extern crate prost_types;
extern crate rand_core;
extern crate regex;
extern crate sha2;

pub mod crypto;
pub mod datalog;
pub mod error;
pub mod format;
pub mod parser;
pub mod token;

#[cfg(cargo_c)]
mod capi;

#[cfg(cargo_c)]
pub use capi::*;

mod time;